Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.
1900 Buganda agreement
Вставка
- Опубліковано 15 тра 2022
- The video covers the 1900 buganda agreement in detail considering each of all the 22 articles of the agreement. Analyzing the implication of each on Ugandas constituional & political history but also on buganda as a kingdom. a light analsis of case law in relation to some of the articles of the agreement is also made.
Contact us for legal advice & for private law tutorial sessions on: 0776490014/0703490014.
Great clever young man thanks.
Thank you so much
Thanks so much I'm learning a lot
You are welcome
Thanks so much Counsel for the grt work
You are welcome
Very informative. Thank you very much
You are welcome
I appreciate your work sir
You are welcome
Thanks 🎉
Appreciate magis sed upload aliis gratias tibi
Thank u sir
Thanks for the program
Musoke, Your welcome.
Thank you counsel am a lawyer in kigali Rwanda I like your lecturer thank you I need to connect u for more engagements in terms legal proofing .Thank u Regards Daniel
Hello Daniel. You are welcome. You can get in touch & we discuss the details. Thanks.
Thank counsel
You are welcome
Big thanks sir
You are welcome
Well said, Mr. Mutyaba. You are right that the Kingdom of Buganda has never been "equal" to any of the 14 major tribes that had joined the kingdom in the early 1900s to form what the British Administration called the "Uganda Protectorate." Hence, saying so does not make it so. Moreover, it is not a matter of the Baganda "feeling" that they are not equal to the rest. Actually, we the Baganda are not and never have been since the 1800s when the Kingdom gained the upper hand over the rest of her neighbours, establishing herself as a power to be reckoned with in the lake region of East Africa. That is what has spawned the bitter resentment since then against the kingdom by the rest of the country up until today. The Kingdom has no peer in everything in Uganda today, even though the rest of the country will never admit it.
You may also be aware that the agreement had never been signed by any Kabaka of Buganda, the reigning Ssekabaka Mwanga II having been exiled in the Seychelles, as punishment for the persecution of the Christian converts in his kingdom. The kingdom was then in the hands of the chiefs you have mentioned, who had endorsed and signed it and not the Kabaka. This would come back to haunt the Governor Sir Andrew Cohen in 1953, when he withdrew his recognition of Ssekabaka Muteesa II sending him into exile. They had apparently disagreed reportedly over the thorny issue of the proposed federation of the east African British administered territories. The Kabaka refused to append his signature to documents the Governor had presented to him at Entebbe, according to Paulo Kavuma, the Katikkiro. The Kabaka would later be vindicated returning in triumph to his kingdom in 1955. It had been determined by law, that no Kabaka was bound by the agreement since none of them had signed it since then, and so, the governor had no authority to do what he had done. Furthermore, the court had asserted that the governor had the prerogative of withdrawing from the agreement but had failed to do so. Hence, the saying in Luganda after the verdit: (teyalina buyinza) - meaning that the governor had acted arbitrarily and without authority.
Therefore, in reality the kingdom had never relinquished her autonomy up until then, and throughout 68 years of the British Administration of Uganda (1894-1962); the agreement notwithstanding. For example, you may recall the Mulira incident in the 1950s. The Kabaka had been accused of seducing his wife. The new Governor Sir Frederick Crawford was careful not to intervene for fear of overstepping his authority. The matter was then settled without interference from the British Administration at all, yet the governor had known about the alleged affair for some time but was powerless to act. Hence, the governor could do everything else that the agreement had stipulated, but he could never assail the Kabaka even if he had wanted to. Finally, that our country was called the "Uganda Protectorate" under the British Administration and not a "colony," is enough to show you the special status secured on behalf of the rest of the country by the auspices of the Kingdom of Buganda; regardless of the 1900 Agreement.
@apolokaggwa6521 You write value and reading through your comments is truly fulfilling.
You display deep knowledge of historical facts & i am impressed and in agreement with your views. Thanks for the comments. They add context to the deep discussion and an informative source indeed.
@@MutyabaConrad Good to know, thanks, Conrad. I do appreciate your scholarly approach as a lawyer, to this and other important events that have taken place in Uganda since 1894. It is quite helpful to us who are not lawyers.
@@apolokaggwa6521 you are welcome.
thanks
You are welcome bonitah
Thanks
You are welcome
Is there a video befor this regarding margna carta
So counsel am I supposed to refer to the 1995 constitution
Gd work done sir👍
Your welcome
Tweyanziza nnyo sebo
Can u teach about the 1894 agreement as well
Webale kusima
We've been getting bits of history here and there. This is like drinking from the well itself other than drinking from akadomola big up on you👍
Thank you. I wish u the best in your endavours
Good work 👍
Thank you.
Good 😊
We had to memorize all this in high school history.
How does someone give away themselves like this?
What about Zakaria kizingiri
I would like private tutorial but I see no contacts
Great job
Your welcome.
What about the features 44:55
Is it Nuwa Mbogo or Zakaria Kisigiri
Those of Noah and stanslus mugwanya were bribed
Well. Am not sure about that. 🤗
Sir is it ,Nuwa Mbogo or Zakaria Kisigiri
For sure be more audible
Noted
GREAT WORK BUT I WISH YOU WHERE MORE AUDIDLE YOU ARE LOW
There was nothing positive in this bogus and very disrespectful document to our land and it's people
Bt are we still following that nonsense to date?
The 1900 Buganda agreement is not binding law today.
Even after independence the British noose in our throats is still as tight as it was before we supposedly became independence.
No we are not
But this nonsense is still being reflected today especially in Buganda.. the search for independence of Buganda and the land question
@@UgandaMotocross it's true. We still have land challenges in Buganda and Uganda generally, mainly caused by the Buganda agreement of 1900 & other factors.
Thank you so much
Is it Nuwa Mbogo or Zakaria Kisigiri
Sir is it ,Nuwa Mbogo or Zakaria Kisigiri
Thank you so much
You are welcome.
Sir is it ,Nuwa Mbogo or Zakaria Kisigiri
Sir is it ,Nuwa Mbogo or Zakaria Kisigiri