Who RUINED Sultan Abdul-Hamid II's Caliphate?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 9 лис 2023
- An overview of the key events and influences that contributed towards and culminated in the fall and decline of the last Muslim global entity (The Ottoman empire). This film provides insights and information both into the role of the Young Turks in the betrayal of the Ottoman empire as well as the detrimental role played by the Arab rebels who were under the leadership of the Sharif of Makkah.The role of the British and French colonial powers is also examined in order to provide a wider perspective and to avoid attributing blame on a single group among the many parties involved in the catastrophic events leading up to 1924 and beyond
___________________________________
Join our Annual Program package (Subscription $10) and discover two of the most dynamic centuries within Muslim History, through regular (bi-weekly ) installments in our exclusive series:
(1) The Umayyad Kingdom | A Study of Islam's First Dynasty
(2) Shadow History | A Review of the Muslim World in the 20th Century
➤ Find out more about the Courses & Programs www.historyun.com/
𝐃𝐈𝐒𝐂𝐎𝐕𝐄𝐑 𝐌𝐎𝐑𝐄 𝐅𝐑𝐎𝐌 𝐇𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐑𝐘𝐔𝐍
➤ Courses & Programs www.historyun.com/
➤ Documentaries on Patreon / historyun
➤ Book Club on Telegram t.me/AdabBookClub
➤ Instant Notifications on Whattapp tinyurl.com/HistoryunWA
➤ Follow us on TwitterX / historyuntweets
___________________________________
#Historyun #IlmFilm #ShadowHistory #IslamicHistory #History #MuslimHistory
Wahhabism, founded by Ibn Abdul Wahab, was one of the important factors that contributed to the downfall of the Caliphate. They began by accusing Muslims, especially the Ottomans, of being kafirs and advocated for their eradication. They aligned with the British and received military support. Later, they signed the Treaty of Darin. Today, this manipulation of religious teachings to serve the West continues, with military bases spreading in Wahhabi countries. Despite Wahhabism's existence for three centuries, no fights have been led by Wahhabism against England or the USA. Their so-called scholars were once advocating for Jihad on every media channel during the Arabic Spring, but now, during the genocide in Gaza, there is silence on Jihad from them.
Salafism was brought to Saudi Arabia by freemasons and merged with the divisive, deviant wahhabism to create a watered down, subservient to the government version of Islam. It was put into a high position by Rockefeller Oil
The New name of Wahabis are now Salafists saying to peaple first pray and then talk about Gaza or dont protest to the government leaders dont boycot it will not help . Even McDonald's,KFC big Pro Israel supporting places are open in Mecca & Medina there is not boycoting if you saying anything they take u in the prison. They working togehter with Crusaders to fight against Islam .
Well said ,to the point
👏👏👏👏👏🙏🙏
The late Ottomans were known for their sufism and shirk practices. Mohammed ibn Abd al-Wahhab introduced renewed Tawheed to the Muslim world.
In a short span of maybe 15 years, the heroes and villains the Ummah has seen....May Allah give Abdulhamid Han and Fahreddin Pasha the greatest positions in Jannah❤
اللهم آمين
Ameen.
The true last Emperor of Muslims ❤
there is not emperor muslims nor ottoman or nor any other nor a country is muslim nor a president i think islam deny nationalism and emperors.
*@user-ov3xe9jy2t.* Caliph and Sultan, no such thing as _empereur_ or _king_ in Islam. Muslim have only One King, *ALLAH, Al Malik.*
Only by returning to the Quran and Sunnah will the Ummah be revived.
people skip teaching the right Aqida is wrong, that is how the sahabas build themselves up first, in fact just ask how the last Caleef peaked & fell, in 1680 they peaked under Taymiyyan Turks teaching Tawhid and shunning shirk, but when they were exiled, Sufi grave worship took over...
Allah tied Tawhid to safety in Quran 24 :55, the sufi Uthmanis lost land, divided , even infiltrated as they made up stuff anyone fit in... and became secular until wanting to remove Arabic and Ashari Jordan rose up backed by uk,
the exiled Taymiyyan turks went south to Syria & their students taught Ibn Abdul Wahab whose later generations would form the sunni gulf nations today, like Saudi Qatar or Bahrain ... and save the Haramain from uk and jordan...
So where did the victory go... it went with the right Aqida... the correct Aqida is needed for victory in Quran 2 :137, Quran 9 : 25 shows numbers isn't the key to victory!
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 Where was the 'correct aqeeda' before Abdul Wahab?
Indeed.
@@abdullahassaffahAudhubillah, do not compare Muhammad ibn Abd Al-Wahhab to Hajjaj.
Sir true very confused and all sections and division all claim same we are on it and who is correct is not easy the people Called salfi or Ahle Hadith same huge problems and not correct in many many issues
Ya Allah. To you we doa to place Sultan Abdul Hamid among the righteous. Despite the tough times, he did his best. May Allah bless us with future equivalent leaders among the ummah.
May Allah have mercy on the Sultan. Great work from the team. Keep the videos coming!
Splendid. Loved the documentary. MashaaAllah great work . Amazing!
Thank you for this great video, very insightful and revealing.
I knew some of the events mentioned. Feel so proud that Muslims, even when the khilafa was ending still produced lions.
Thanks for the documentary.MY ALLAH UNITE US AGAIN
Akhi this is brilliant. I'm listening for the second time. Who are the speakers? Barak'Allahu feek
This video deserves way more views.
Great video, I liked the way it flowed like a story. However, please could you provide sources?! Every great historian or seeker of knowledge wants to know where they got their facts from. For instance, who are the speakers in this video? And where can we find their original talks?
I second this request, Ustadh AZ. JazakaLlahu khayr for the presentation. But kindly include references one could visit later.
Great documentary. Keep up the good work.
Much appreciated!
May Allah have mercy on the Ottomans those who fought for the holy places. And may Allah curse the munafiqin like the munafiqin of nowadays.
Beautiful
Excellent presentation of an important topic. Woe unto those who assisted in the betrayal of Islam
Great video. Who is the English speaker in the Documentary?
Good video, can you please provide citations? Where did you get the quote for king Wilhelm?
Before the Ottoman Empire was founded, its collapse was obvious; In total, 36 sultans would ascend to the throne. Osman Gazi was given the good news by St. Mevlana. They tried the 37th caliph but it didn't work.
Shaykh Lokman Effendi Hz towards end of the video is a true Tasawuf Shaykh.
(From the Osmanli Dergahi)
It was a combination of the zionist west which was allied to jewish extremists within Turkey, the arab traitors who revolted the Ottomans with western backing, and internal proxy-terrorists backed by the west including the wahabi saudi tribes and western backed secular turks from the youth.
On the otherhand we also had koofar crusaderists from Russia on the other front, who also backed armenian terrorists to instigate chaos within turkey.
99th comment, i think this video is taking audio from other channel is saw few years ago, maybe you did it with their concenst but i hoping more 😊 like the discussion video. About muslim only care the history of their nationality aren't muslim nationality is inseparable with Islam? Ottoman history is also Turkish history. Last day i saw a podcast in a channel named Al Hakam who said the Ottoman desecrated our Propeth tomb by using it as fort and military storage ?
Who's the speaker?
Sheikh Lokman Effendi is the one who speaks on Ottoman history
The other one is Muhammad Musa AlShareef
Dr Yakoob Ahmed
How many times have you chamged the title by now
The answer to your Question is the Arabs betrayed the whole Muslim Ummah, which lead to other betrayals.
The funny thing is the Ottoman what the first people to create engine who discovered but they used it for Kabab
Poor guy didn't have chance sebatay jews from Greece Armenians and west not to mention the zionists were all against him,Also The Arabs in Arabia who were promised a kingdom then later screwed by the English who Attacked the train line and the Turks ,Ataturk giving way for the english to take palestine ,All this because the ummah failed ,Once the ummah wasn't airtight leakes started to happen ,Water sleeps but the enemy does not !!
This problem could have been fixed if they just looked at how the rashid Khilafat work but obviously they won't look at it because the Rashid Khilafat was not a monarchy
Mistake at 6:50. 1878 and not 1978
In a Khilafat you can have election not everyone is capable of choosing basically you have to choose some people and they choose amongst themselves who will be the Khalifa
04:05 how we can not?
Either explain with clarity and 4-5 example that this is the Sharia, or rule, and such are it's options which can vary and not be constant, so such articulation would be tough and that there are countless such cases and scenarios.
06:51 The year is 1978, Abdul Hameed II was definitely invincible, and immortal, to be not bored of life.
08:31 There was an interesting question in a mock interview of the Indian civil services exam, what is the difference between a Sultan and a Badshah - a term widely used in South Asia, for the King or the rulers of different set of families and era.
A Sultan would pledge allegiance to the Khalifa, while a Badshah would be sovereign. Only few initial dynasties of rulers in the Indian sub-continent or South Asia were reffered to as Sultan, the Mongols were reffered to as Badshah, so on what ground would the interference of the Khalifa be justified in the Indian sub-continent, although Sultan Abdul Hameed II interfered into the Indian polity during the British rule, as a reaction to British corruption directly affecting the railway project towards Arab geography, as per the Turkish Drama serial, I've not read any history.
The Indian polity has the influence of the Khalifa, because there was a khilafat movement taught in the Indian polity during the British rule.
turks/arabs been helping the west for 100 years now
In Islam you can Revolt against the ruler but not for nationalism and the rules of revolting is that you should have enough strong force that once you take over you can stabilize the country and your enemies won't and capable of having any benefits for themselves in this collapse and that Surah obey Allah prophet and the ruler is for the ruler who is a true Khalifa not somebody yazid who was invented and that's why Hazrat Hussain went against him
yeah it is this logic, what made every muslim community colonised. and most under severe invasion today.
Only if Arabs not betreyed the Ottoman😢
Aur the Khalifa appoints somebody by himself life Hazrat Abu Bakar did with Hazrat Umar
imagine being so full of audacity, you topple the kingdom just because you're bored
I always felt that Ataturk (who btw wasn't even Turk) was more of an antimuslim traitor than a wise leader, espacially when I heard that he provided that roadmap to Hitler
and Turkish people just celebrated 100 years of democracy
Please explain further.
@@abrahamgustavoguitiperez-m2937
Ataturk was a member of the Freemasons order. He was very pro Europe. That wouldn’t have been a problem if he did not push the Turkish nationalistic narrative, built the narrative that the Caliph isn’t a truly Muslim caliph because he’s not supporting the Muslims of India using Islamic values as a tool, got Abdul Hameed II disposed off with a group of like minded people, offended the Shareef of Makkah which initiated the whole Middle Eastern revolt against the ottomans, and once the caliphate was over, he introduced a brand of secularism which was very very anti-Muslim
1. He banned azan in Arabic
2. His policy makers shifted the font from Arabic style alphabets to Latin alphabets
3. Introduced the hat law
4. Banned Islamic clothing for men
5. Witch-hunted the sufi orders, criminalising zikr
6. Turned Hagia Sophia into a museum
These are clearly steps to divorce the Turkish nation from their Islamic past. Other than that, he basically Europeanised Turkey. Giving third names to families, which isn’t a Muslim tradition but a european practice. The very thing for which he criticised the caliph, he did that by developing relations with UK. And he himself was quite a debauch person. He contracted an STD because of which he had to have his physician up close till his death, his drinking habits caused him his liver and he couldn’t hold on to a wife. He even refused to accept the dead body of the last caliph in Turkey. And ordered his own burial, not in a grave like Muslims, but in a sarcophagus like Pharaohs.
People think of him as a hero who fathered the nation, well he just made it illegal to criticise him. All books, all literature, all the things that came out of his time were heavily censored. This sounds very much like dictatorship to me. And till date, it is illegal to criticise him in Turkey. This was quite impressive for Hitler who followed in his footsteps. Kurdish people are still suffering because of his regime. Infact, his brand of secularism is what France insists upon now
I have no stakes in Turkish history, but I refuse to see Ataturk as the hero he’s painted as.
1 little question, abt Armenian killings under Sultan Abdulhamid Han, how did it happen though?
It was not a unilateral one. In it happened in a long drawn out conventional war between Tuks and Armenians.
they revolt and get suppressed. like whats happening in US right now.
😢😢😢😢
You should have used force a enemy is a enemy
❤
To be fair, the Muslim Ummah themselves ruined it. Most Arab, Turk, Kurd, Persian had a relationship with the laws of Allah only. No relationship with Allah. Can a true believer who has a relationship with Allah pursue this ugly world.
They 4:13
Turks within the ottoman empire were the great calamity and also equally responsible for the decline..
They were the ones who carried Western ideologies and were Anti Caliphate. Those were the ones who first caused the downfall of the empire.
One can say Turks backstabbed their own Turks first.
The decline was from within. From the roots..
no
I agree, the turks took the first Steps in betraying the Ottoman caliphate when they overthrew Sultan Abdul Hamid II. The Arab betrayal came later on in World War I. The final betrayal, the final nail in the coffin of the caliphate came from secular Turks like Mustafa Kemal Ataturk.
@@AO-jk1pgyes.
This word "Betrayal" ... If betrayal means establishing Islam again, Alhamdulilah they "betrayed" the kuffar government of the Ottomans who allowed grave worship at the end of its reign@@gajiburrahman7378
May Allah Bless the Saudis for establishing Sunnah once again and getting rid of the Polytheism grave worship that the Ottoman empire brought into the masses of people.
"Dua is Ibadah (worship)" - Prophet Muhammas SAW ... sunnah . com/adab:714
Allah is above the heavens and Earth as Allah and His Messenger have told us multiple times, "Have mercy on the creation so Allah will have Mercy on you from above the heavens"(or as said in another narration "the one who is in the heavens, meaning "above") - Mohammed SAW. ... sunnah . com /abudawud:4941
@@gajiburrahman7378 totally agree with you. Young Turks, arab nationalism t name few
😭😭😭😭😭😭
first calipha sultan mehmet han and the last sultan abdulhamid 2 two piece one with unity and other piece alone vs all and yet amazing characters compared to mbs is just a joke...
when, how n why turks met w islam n it spread to the state?
Sultan Abdul-Hamid and his predecessors did since they ruled with incredibly superficial intentions rather than Islamic
what do u mean superficial intention????
Rubbish comment
1915🫵
Also the neglect felt by the Arab people should be factored in when talking about the caliphate’s end.
Arabs didn’t recognize Ottoman Empire as a true khilafah
@@Iamfsaly oh ya think 🙄🙄
@@tauhidershadKUFNAFLORANYes because the Hanbali madhab doesnt allow a non-Qurayshi to be Caliph
Wow, Abdülhamid and Ottoman rule relevent again 😂. You guys never ever accepted Ottoman Caliphate in first place, why are you pretend you care now?
What do you mean? Why the channel not accepted him as Caliph??
@@bosbanon3452 its not channel its muslim world. Muslim world . Muslim world never really accept Ottoman Caliphate.
@@Ahmet-yu7jr chp zihniyeti right ?
🍎🍉☝
I wonder if the genocides done in Assyria and Armenia will be mentioned. 😢😢
Muslim empire? How can anything inanimate have or do anything. Anyways, since the fall of the individual/human ruled Ottoman empire, Islam has only grown by leaps and bounds to over 2 billion 2,000,000,000 adherents! So no decline there.
It seems you have got no brains brother
We are suffering,no matter what our Population is
Do you think Palestinians, kashmiris , Syrians, Africans would have still been suffering if our Caliph was present
In simple Caliph is a subordinate given from Allah
You need to rethink, otherwise you are promoting western ideology
Wake up oh brothers we are suffering all around , Don't get trapped into this satanist idea
Muslims are now only in name... numbers are not important in islam
Islam hasn't declined but no global empire anymore
@@sobiyakhan-xr4dz Lol , most of the muslim world was colonised when the ottoman empire was around , you have no idea what you are talking about , in fact we are better now than before.
@@mohammed9w553 *George Curzon, the British Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs:* "We must put an end to anything which brings about any Islamic unity between the sons of the Muslims. As we have already succeeded in finishing off the Ottoman Caliphate, so we must ensure that there will never arise again unity for the Muslims, whether it be intellectual, political, economic or cultural unity."
british wahhabi
You should have used force a enemy is a enemy