Get a COMPLETE WRITTEN Literature Review in SECONDS!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 18

  • @AnswerThisio
    @AnswerThisio Місяць тому +5

    Thank you so much for doing this review on our tool, it's an absolute honor!
    More than happy to hear any feedback from those who have used the tool!

    • @AIandTechforEducation
      @AIandTechforEducation  Місяць тому +2

      It's such a great tool that I have found extremely useful!
      Great work adding so many great features!

    • @Foodieme610
      @Foodieme610 Місяць тому +2

      It's a really wonderful tool, and it helped me a lot in my reviews! Thanks for sharing!!

  • @mesfingm11
    @mesfingm11 4 дні тому +1

    Thank you for your doing....

  • @tonyha8888
    @tonyha8888 13 днів тому +1

    Thank you very much for this review. How does this compare with Consensus AI?

    • @AIandTechforEducation
      @AIandTechforEducation  9 днів тому

      They’re both excellent platforms for literature reviews.
      I really like how Answer this writes out the complete review to give you that initial understanding, and I also love how Consensus can find intricate themes in the literature.
      You’ll find that they return different papers so useful to experiment with both to find which is stronger for your field.

  • @NehemiaPuuaapoUzera
    @NehemiaPuuaapoUzera Місяць тому +1

    Thank you very much. Can you share as to how one can choose a referencing style(APA, Chicago...)?

    • @AIandTechforEducation
      @AIandTechforEducation  Місяць тому

      Hi it depends on your journal or assignment requirements. If you're aiming to publish your research article, I strongly recommend that you select a journal that aligns with your topic and read the author submission requirements first. That way you'll tailor your draft to their requirements.

  • @vineshsingh5072
    @vineshsingh5072 Місяць тому +1

    Fabulous. Thanks a million. Extremely useful.

  • @internationalall-roundfavours
    @internationalall-roundfavours Місяць тому +2

    Much as technological advancement is revolutionizing life, what is at stake is the unethical use of AI tools.
    The critical question is this; who and what becomes of a Researcher who relies on a machine generated ideas ? This raises concern on the value of knowledge.
    Far from the possibility of detection, humanity must act responsibly.
    Thank you

    • @AIandTechforEducation
      @AIandTechforEducation  Місяць тому +2

      This is a great point, and I think we need to understand that these are tools that help make our work more productive and efficient, but at the end of the day they will not replace the insights that you generate as a researcher, the analysis that you have to perform to come up with novel findings.
      What these tools do is save you hours of work bringing all the resources you need together so that you can add your magic.
      Thank you for your thoughts.

  • @Beloved_Digital
    @Beloved_Digital Місяць тому +1

    Thank you for sharing ❤

  • @fiboalem
    @fiboalem Місяць тому +2

    Thank you for sharing. If you compare Scispace and answerthis which one is best for lit. review writing?

    • @AIandTechforEducation
      @AIandTechforEducation  Місяць тому +2

      I think you’ll find that both have some excellent features.
      I like using Answerthis to get a full complete and structured overview that lets me visualize some of the key areas that I’ll focus on and the potential structure.
      Then I’ll go to scispace and distill the key topics especially with their feature that lets you add a column to focus on a particular area such as practical implications and so on.
      So it’s great to be able to combine tools to get insights from both.
      Hope that helps!

    • @NehemiaPuuaapoUzera
      @NehemiaPuuaapoUzera Місяць тому

      Thank you very much! Can you share as to how to change the referencing style from Chicago to APA.