Brooklyn man convicted of possessing ghost guns maintains he had every right to have them

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 4,1 тис.

  • @GunsBlazingRanch
    @GunsBlazingRanch Місяць тому +3035

    This guy is spending 10 years in jail in NY for something that is a fundamental right in Florida.

    • @ilikechickensausages2075
      @ilikechickensausages2075 29 днів тому +20

      But Not for everyone.

    • @JoseMartinez-cr2kv
      @JoseMartinez-cr2kv 29 днів тому +61

      Nyc is not Florida

    • @AlphaBetSoup-69
      @AlphaBetSoup-69 29 днів тому +144

      It will be overturned and he’s gonna get a fat check for this civil rights violation.

    • @MarkRamirez-t3n
      @MarkRamirez-t3n 29 днів тому +58

      Youre right thats why its a problem , youre allowed to have em in all 50 states regardless of what anyones says , not just florida

    • @10Wk3y84R
      @10Wk3y84R 28 днів тому +24

      ​@@AlphaBetSoup-69nope, supreme court already ruled localities are allowed their own gun regulations and he violated it, he's staying in prison

  • @michael198427
    @michael198427 Місяць тому +1607

    BUT THE ATF CAN OPENLY SMUGGLE GUNS AND DRUGS TO COUNTRIES

    • @joe-id5pb
      @joe-id5pb Місяць тому +89

      Remember Obama's "fast and furious" program, where to this day no one was held accountable.

    • @JohnLocke1776
      @JohnLocke1776 28 днів тому +4

      Exactly

    • @JohnLocke1776
      @JohnLocke1776 28 днів тому

      In SoCal yesterday, a gun shop owner told me the DOJ has a live feed into the store and watches/listens to everything. These people fund terrorism abroad, spy on us yet Lord over us violating our rights

    • @successquotes233
      @successquotes233 28 днів тому +15

      Operation Fast and furious. And then loose those guns.

    • @sacpyro
      @sacpyro 28 днів тому

      well yea it’s a fkn government agency you guys all sound like mick dodges and think you can do whatever you want like this is a constitutional right wen it’s not you can’t own or manufacture guns without serial numbers so if you really think you won’t get in trouble try it and see if you don’t get a gun charge if the cops find it

  • @MarkTheTreeManVann
    @MarkTheTreeManVann Місяць тому +2870

    The judge said the second amendment doesn't exist in her courtroom... She needs to be disbarred.

    • @user-eh5cr4or6k
      @user-eh5cr4or6k Місяць тому +287

      Did you notice how the reporter left that out of his story?

    • @eman3414
      @eman3414 Місяць тому +53

      EXACTLY

    • @douglemay7989
      @douglemay7989 Місяць тому +18

      What "well-regulated militia" do you belong to?

    • @MarkTheTreeManVann
      @MarkTheTreeManVann Місяць тому +145

      @@douglemay7989 what cult do you belong too? If you don't follow the constitution as a judge... They're clearly in violation of the oath they laid their hand on a Bible and swore an oath to uphold the constitution and the bill of rights... Check and mate soy boy... What she said and did is completely illegal...

    • @Yarnover_PullThrough
      @Yarnover_PullThrough Місяць тому

      @@MarkTheTreeManVannthis wasn’t a violation of anything. Then everyone can walk around with a ghost gun. Gimme a damn break. People are so full is crap. All of these shootings and for what for a 1700 amendment? The British aren’t coming RELAX!

  • @junito1008
    @junito1008 19 днів тому +228

    This man wasn’t selling the guns…go get real criminals !!

  • @michaelshive6748
    @michaelshive6748 26 днів тому +954

    I smell a federal lawsuit coming. Judge says the 2nd Amendment doesn't exist in her courtroom. Suuuuure, it doesn't. Hope you lose your license.

    • @DonD-rb1mr
      @DonD-rb1mr 18 днів тому +18

      It's a crime he's locked up

    • @everthingoutdoors8181
      @everthingoutdoors8181 18 днів тому +53

      ​@@DonD-rb1mr Shut up bot

    • @RighteousJ
      @RighteousJ 18 днів тому +3

      There is no requirement to have a law degree to run for office as a judge; it's an elected position like any other. The only lifetime appointments are to the state and federal Supreme Courts.

    • @MONTEWOLF
      @MONTEWOLF 18 днів тому +19

      Today it's him tomorrow it's you

    • @TheLordbal
      @TheLordbal 17 днів тому +12

      Judge made herself a target for some nice vigilante.

  • @richardminnis8013
    @richardminnis8013 Місяць тому +2005

    This isn't just his fight man, it's all of our fight that he is fighting.

  • @falcorthewonderdog2758
    @falcorthewonderdog2758 27 днів тому +1256

    Actually assembling guns at your house isnt illegal. This is a huge violation of his civil rights. This is a multi million dollar civil rights lawsuit.

    • @cheeko_914
      @cheeko_914 25 днів тому +18

      Had nothing to do with assembling them. He was arrested because he was he was building ghost guns that were also assault weapons.
      Edit: I love how you uneducated morons keep repeating the same "NO SUCH THING AS AN ASSAULT WEAPON" bs and then when I prove you wrong you stop replying. This is why no one takes the 2A community seriously.

    • @KingOdie520
      @KingOdie520 24 дні тому +95

      ​@cheeko_914 define assault weapon and ghost gun for me?

    • @Gabonro
      @Gabonro 24 дні тому +54

      ​@@cheeko_914Are you accusing him of possessing military rifles or did you mean something else?
      To clarify: Many politicians and reporters use the term "Assault weapon" for sensationalism, but it is a term without meaning. They apply it to what are functionally the same as hanguns, but with long barrels.
      This is because they don't want to lie and use a specific term like "Assault rifle", which is an automatic rifle used by the US Army. Those are already illegal to possess without a license and have a legal definition.
      I ask for clarification because many people have confusion over the meaning due to propganda and I assume you mistyped.

    • @cheeko_914
      @cheeko_914 24 дні тому +8

      @@Gabonro I am accusing him of clearly breaking the law by possessing assault weapons, as defined by NY state law where this took place.

    • @cheeko_914
      @cheeko_914 24 дні тому

      @@KingOdie520 its not that hard to take 10 minutes to google the ny state laws, you should try it...
      Ghost gun:
      Penal Law § 265.00(32) specifies that: “ ‘Ghost gun’ means a firearm, rifle
      or shotgun that does not comply with the provisions of section 265.07 of this article
      and is not serialized.”
      Penal Law § 265.00(8-a) defines “serialized” as follows: "Serialized"
      means bearing a visible identification number and/or symbol in accordance with
      the requirements imposed on licensed importers and licensed manufacturers
      pursuant to subsection (i) of Section 923 of Title 18 of the United States Code and
      regulations issued pursuant thereto in effect at the time of assembly. . . .”
      Penal Law § 265.07 provides, in relevant part, that “[o]n or before the
      effective date of this section, and promptly upon taking possession thereof at any
      time thereafter, any person licensed as a gunsmith, or required to be, or a dealer
      in firearms pursuant to section 400.00 of this chapter, who is in possession of an
      unserialized firearm, rifle, shotgun, finished frame or receiver, or unfinished frame
      or receiver shall: (a) engrave, cast, stamp or otherwise conspicuously place both
      a unique serial number and his or her name (or recognized abbreviation) on such
      firearm, rifle, shotgun, finished frame or receiver, or unfinished frame or receiver,
      in a manner that satisfies or exceeds the requirements imposed on licensed
      importers and manufacturers pursuant to section (i) of Section 923 of Title 18 of
      the United States Code and regulations issued pursuant thereto at the time of such
      assembly.”
      Assault weapon:
      The SAFE ACT bans most semi-automatic rifles by making it a felony to possess a semi-automatic rifle with a detachable magazine that has one or more cosmetic features that New York finds undesirable, such as:
      A folding or adjustable stock
      A thumbhole stock
      A pistol grip
      A bayonet lug
      A foregrip
      A flash suppressor
      A muzzle brake
      A threaded barrel, or
      A grenade launcher
      In addition, semi-automatic handguns are considered assault weapons if they have any one of the following features:
      A manufactured weight over 50 ounces unloaded
      A folding or adjustable stock
      A thumbhole stock
      A foregrip or second pistol grip
      A magazine that attaches outside of the pistol grip
      A barrel shroud, or
      A threaded barrel
      Shotguns are considered assault weapons if they are semi-automatic and have any one of the following features:
      A folding or adjustable stock
      A thumbhole stock
      A foregrip or second pistol grip
      The ability to accept a detachable magazine, or
      A fixed magazine with a capacity over 7 rounds.
      Those who owned these “Assault Weapons” before the SAFE Act were required to register them.

  • @2Afreedom513
    @2Afreedom513 19 днів тому +89

    This government is violating this man’s rights

  • @FSportJess
    @FSportJess Місяць тому +698

    Free that man ! He’s within his constitutional rights.

    • @Yourmission9
      @Yourmission9 16 днів тому

      I agree with you, but tell that to the woman who recently got an abortion in a banned state. I’m not trying to be contrarian but look around brother✌️

    • @keymusabe7207
      @keymusabe7207 16 днів тому +2

      That wont free him
      A because he is ⚫️
      B because they want to set an example

    • @zacharycox2014
      @zacharycox2014 14 днів тому +3

      ​@@Yourmission9I agree with your cause, but abortion isn't in the constitution.

    • @KingDevoneoGotBeats
      @KingDevoneoGotBeats 9 днів тому

      Exactly! I agree 💯

  • @aaronwilson4258
    @aaronwilson4258 Місяць тому +970

    Guns only need serial numbers and the name of the city it was made in if you plan to sell them. Homemade guns for self use don't require them.

    • @lightstar1053
      @lightstar1053 29 днів тому +1

      the democrats of ny don't care about laws. They know the serial law and they overwrite laws even if it's unconstitutional. It's all about ideology

    • @anthonyhenderson892
      @anthonyhenderson892 28 днів тому +6

      Which states

    • @aaronwilson4258
      @aaronwilson4258 27 днів тому +126

      @@anthonyhenderson892 All of them. It's a federal law.

    • @limbeboy7
      @limbeboy7 27 днів тому +70

      ​@@anthonyhenderson892 2nd amendment. Right to bear arms. Didn't say the arms has to come from a mom and pops store

    • @anthonyhenderson892
      @anthonyhenderson892 27 днів тому +14

      @@limbeboy7 I’m in California. State laws allowed home made guns in the past without registered serial numbers. People preferred state laws for marijuana and federal laws for guns. It’s just what’s more convenient.

  • @Living_Despite
    @Living_Despite Місяць тому +667

    Its not illegal. Every American has the right to manufacturer or construte their own firearm.

    • @Discovery.2100
      @Discovery.2100 28 днів тому +4

      Where is that in the Constitution 😅😅😅😅

    • @agoodnight1050
      @agoodnight1050 27 днів тому +76

      ​@@Discovery.2100second amendment. And that right shall not be infringed. The judge said the second amendment doesn't exist in her courtroom, so even the judge agree the Constitution says it she just doesn't like it

    • @dominikjaneka2697
      @dominikjaneka2697 27 днів тому +5

      you have worms in your brain honestly.

    • @corxter
      @corxter 27 днів тому +3

      ​@agoodnight1050 the second amendment was about a well regulated militia some dude building guns in a apartment is not what the founding fathers intended.

    • @limbeboy7
      @limbeboy7 27 днів тому +37

      ​@@Discovery.2100 where in the constitution does it say your arms has to be purchased from somewhere?

  • @sixxgunz3774
    @sixxgunz3774 25 днів тому +70

    #1. Building your own firearms is 100% legal. Selling them is not unless you have an FFL and serialize them.

  • @Alex24357
    @Alex24357 28 днів тому +250

    In a maximum security prison? They are endangering this man for no reason

    • @DesertHeat12
      @DesertHeat12 19 днів тому +9

      THIS!

    • @grifhunter
      @grifhunter 16 днів тому +11

      A violation of a bureaucratic gun regulation is considered a "violent felony" in NY. Laughable.

    • @DesertHeat12
      @DesertHeat12 16 днів тому +1

      @@grifhunter major BS!

    • @boklao9699
      @boklao9699 13 днів тому +1

      they just jealous what he has.

  • @ceegee924
    @ceegee924 Місяць тому +1238

    The cops come quick when it's against you. If you actually need them they are no where to be found

    • @lucaslebel3766
      @lucaslebel3766 Місяць тому +45

      100% agree!!!

    • @bobroberts2371
      @bobroberts2371 Місяць тому +20

      This was planned warrant search not a response to a 911 call. You seem to think that the tac unit got a call seconds before they showed up.

    • @550Benz
      @550Benz Місяць тому

      Always remember they are only there to harass and collect from
      The law abiding citizens .
      They never patrio areas that are known to have high crime , they like their job to be easy . For every good cop that upholds his oath their outnumbered 100-1 by guys with chips on the shoulder who break their oath on a daily basis .

    • @Radbot776
      @Radbot776 Місяць тому +32

      Yet they release dudes strait up caught with stolen guns and switches

    • @EmmanuelTheodore
      @EmmanuelTheodore Місяць тому

      All of them in the body cam are Jackboot oath braking thugs... they told him he has a right to remain silent, what about his right to keep and bear arms?

  • @FiggaFrank
    @FiggaFrank Місяць тому +257

    Free that man he’s not a criminal

  • @GoFlyYourself
    @GoFlyYourself 20 днів тому +55

    The state trolling through lawfully purchased sales information should be illegal.

  • @jonathanfranco9676
    @jonathanfranco9676 Місяць тому +719

    This dude is fighting for everyone.

    • @donwyoming1936
      @donwyoming1936 Місяць тому +3

      He even broke federal law. Not just state laws.

    • @mrjackdaniels0309
      @mrjackdaniels0309 Місяць тому +28

      @@donwyoming1936 legit question: what federal law?

    • @smallpeople172
      @smallpeople172 Місяць тому +11

      @@donwyoming1936no he didn’t.

    • @x0Kharnage0x187
      @x0Kharnage0x187 Місяць тому

      🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

    • @BillyBob-tr3jr
      @BillyBob-tr3jr Місяць тому +3

      ​@donwyoming1936 even if so this case could very well reach SCOTUS who would rightly strike this down and establish a clear presedent that im sure would drive you nuts 😂

  • @Lightinside24-f2z
    @Lightinside24-f2z Місяць тому +285

    His rights were violated fer sure.

  • @aceriversLIVE
    @aceriversLIVE Місяць тому +140

    The constitution does NOT say That your firearm must contain a serial Number!!!!! We the people have the right To bear Arms PERIOD no matter who makes it!!

    • @bane8305
      @bane8305 24 дні тому

      dude unless every cittzen is armed these are dangerous they can leave cases unresolved and take time and money out of our police budgets

    • @trueFENDY-c2y
      @trueFENDY-c2y 24 дні тому +10

      Facts this has to get a netflix special

    • @KingDevoneoGotBeats
      @KingDevoneoGotBeats 9 днів тому +1

      I agree 💯

  • @Thatuptownguy
    @Thatuptownguy 18 днів тому +51

    Sick part is he didnt even use them for anything nor did he show intent to. 10 years. Thats absurd.

  • @jackmurphy8545
    @jackmurphy8545 Місяць тому +949

    This the guy who’s judge said “I’m not trying to hear about the 2nd amendment?” She should be disbarred

  • @marsbanditnyc9043
    @marsbanditnyc9043 Місяць тому +297

    The search warrant itself was illegal. To establish probable cause the judge would have needed more than reasonable suspicion. If the purchasing of weapon parts itself is not a crime how can it be proof of a crime? Anything found in the search is inadmissible.

    • @shareefk9039
      @shareefk9039 Місяць тому +27

      Maybe this is on purpose. They know it will get thrown out or they have the option of throwing it out after ruining his life and using up his money while at the same time trying to intimidate anyone else from building “ghost guns”.

    • @dirtfarmer7070
      @dirtfarmer7070 Місяць тому

      ​@@shareefk9039the state of New York spends a lot of time attempting to intimidate its citizens....

    • @zanderbrandt1730
      @zanderbrandt1730 28 днів тому +14

      100%. Unless he sold one to an undercover agent or was posting about it online with his name/face associated with the postings (highly unlikely) there isn't probable cause here at all. There are tons of people who buy gun parts and P80 lowers etc. Hundreds of thousands if not in the low-millions

    • @CBECK73
      @CBECK73 24 дні тому +1

      Spot on

    • @thelispinglizard5458
      @thelispinglizard5458 24 дні тому

      New York is the kangaroo court state we should already know that after seeing what their trying to do to trump.

  • @edlamb9940
    @edlamb9940 Місяць тому +447

    `”Ghost guns” isn’t a real term. For almost 200 years building your own firearm was more common than not. I believe it was 1968 when the government said it MUST be serialized, which is in itself un Constitutional.

    • @jason200912
      @jason200912 27 днів тому +13

      It also showed a slight increase in violent crimes, showing to economists that the measure made no impact

    • @spraynpray
      @spraynpray 26 днів тому +21

      The serial number is only required if you intend to sell the firearm. Still an illegal infringement, but you can legally make unserialized guns all day.

    • @cowboyx9380
      @cowboyx9380 26 днів тому +12

      ONLY manufacturers who sell firearms are required to put serial numbers on them….period! And that law came to be in 1968…..

    • @carbonfiber8071
      @carbonfiber8071 26 днів тому +5

      @@cowboyx9380 And that was for chasing defects in manufacturing, not for tracing.

    • @cheeko_914
      @cheeko_914 25 днів тому +1

      ​@cowboyx9380 then why does NY have laws that contradict that? You don't know what you're talking about, stop spreading misinformation.

  • @brandonhalliday2029
    @brandonhalliday2029 20 днів тому +19

    There is no such thing as a ghost gun.

  • @ToMgRoEbE
    @ToMgRoEbE 27 днів тому +251

    Every officer that was a part of this operation is an oath breaker

    • @dragonf1092
      @dragonf1092 23 дні тому

      They are all Insurrectionists.

    • @TheCastedone
      @TheCastedone 20 днів тому +18

      There are thousands more brother

    • @ctuesburgable
      @ctuesburgable 18 днів тому +13

      Every officer in the country is an oath breaker. I don't like it, but it is a fact.

    • @dragonf1092
      @dragonf1092 18 днів тому

      @ctuesburgable because we have the second amendment law enforcement shouldn't even legally lawfully exist they are contrary to the constitution and freedom and liberty.

    • @dragonf1092
      @dragonf1092 18 днів тому

      @ctuesburgable Congress wasn't created to criminalize and enslave everything we have and do.

  • @Clintscollectiblez
    @Clintscollectiblez 29 днів тому +185

    Right to bare arms shall not be infringed upon.

    • @ts109
      @ts109 25 днів тому +3

      "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" Regulated is in there, why do you always leave that part out? And that language refers to a nation not personal.

    • @xajames
      @xajames 24 дні тому +6

      ​@@ts109 "the right of the people to keep and bare arms" do you think the militias are government owned? They're privately owned and si are their guns even in the revolutionary war alot of people were just farmers with hunting rifles

    • @XampleTactical
      @XampleTactical 24 дні тому +10

      @@ts109 In 1776, the term "well-regulated" meant that a militia was well-organized, well-armed, and well-disciplined, and was able to fight effectively not regulated in a sense of how we think today by a government body i.e federal or state

    • @AppalachianMountaineer1863
      @AppalachianMountaineer1863 24 дні тому +5

      @@ts109regulated means trained. Ever heard of a “Regular”
      You think regulated means restricted. It doesn’t mean that.

    • @cmdniels
      @cmdniels 24 дні тому +1

      ​@@ts109America does not have a militia anymore they got the army now. but you just cannot ban 300million guns

  • @catwithoutthehat
    @catwithoutthehat Місяць тому +607

    It is not illegal to build your own, it has been a right since the founding of america

    • @avlawns3037
      @avlawns3037 Місяць тому +5

      Nyc says different.

    • @jay6874
      @jay6874 Місяць тому +51

      ​@avlawns3037 which is the problem because the constitution applies to all states so having a state thinking they can supercede the constitution with state laws is comical at best. NYC is but a state nothing more.

    • @lostsoul029
      @lostsoul029 Місяць тому +6

      @catwithoutthehat you have a right to use guns, but must follow any state law around it. It was police not ATF. His defense has no teeth

    • @catwithoutthehat
      @catwithoutthehat Місяць тому +13

      @@lostsoul029 marbury vs madison

    • @theintolerantape
      @theintolerantape Місяць тому +14

      @@lostsoul029 Shall not be infringed.

  • @dleblanc3592
    @dleblanc3592 16 днів тому +9

    Free this man immediately.

  • @justinreyes4399
    @justinreyes4399 Місяць тому +700

    He had all those guns and never caused a problem? Give him his sht back

    • @UniShuoi-e6z
      @UniShuoi-e6z Місяць тому +59

      He wanted to develop guns for the government, he got thrown in jail. Let that sink in

    • @Mark-qv4bn
      @Mark-qv4bn Місяць тому +19

      ​@@UniShuoi-e6z You can't break your own state laws. Ghost guns are legal here in Arizona, as we have no registration for guns.

    • @MulaMan718
      @MulaMan718 Місяць тому +50

      @@Mark-qv4bnno federal law can be ignored brother we have a second amendment right

    • @tyrekedadon7910
      @tyrekedadon7910 Місяць тому +15

      You know 100% he was flipping 💰💰them and had a store. Yall will believe anything 🙄

    • @lynch6642
      @lynch6642 Місяць тому +19

      ​@@tyrekedadon7910No law against doing that either

  • @johngonzalez851
    @johngonzalez851 Місяць тому +293

    Your constitutional law professor needs to update herself. There is no more public safety balancing of the law since the Bruen decision. Hope this guy winds up on top.

    • @joshuarivera428
      @joshuarivera428 Місяць тому +33

      Exactly. The constitution doesn't need to be balanced or regulated. People have the RIGHT to bear arms, PERIOD. end of story!

    • @mikeb5664
      @mikeb5664 Місяць тому +1

      @@joshuarivera428 Someone isn't old enough to remember the ban on certain assault style firearms.

    • @KalashniKEV762
      @KalashniKEV762 Місяць тому +8

      I was going to make that comment- how is she a law professor?? There are laws at different levels, but the Constitution holds supremacy. You don't pass a law via the legislative branch and then break it "for balance" in the executive/ enforcement or judicial. She basically admitted that she does not know what a law is.

    • @xander2541
      @xander2541 Місяць тому +8

      ​@mikeb5664 funny how the 94AWB didn't last and also didn't make any difference

    • @brosrcool
      @brosrcool 29 днів тому +6

      @@mikeb5664 Assault is an act of physical violence. Inanimate objects cannot commit the crime of assault. If I used a sheet to strangle a person would the sheet become an assault style sheet?

  • @donaldmarwitz2046
    @donaldmarwitz2046 26 днів тому +98

    Its perfectly clear. What he did was completely legal. No such laws can be made to prevent or supercede the bill of rights and construction. The state of NY has done just that and not by just a little. Its man that sacrifices like him helps pave the way to correcting a big injustice for all. God bless and be safe!❤

    • @goldenglowmaster8510
      @goldenglowmaster8510 21 день тому +1

      So why can't felons own firearms of any kind

    • @donaldmarwitz2046
      @donaldmarwitz2046 20 днів тому

      @goldenglowmaster8510 You can't have a weapon if you are on parole. It's a bit tricky, really, but it is possible for an ex fellon, but many factors play into it. For example, many non-violent felonies allow for ways people to once again be allowed to carry a weapon. Did you know you're not allowed to vote either, I think that one is so stupid. After some time period you can file a motion leaking to exspung the crime, it normally requires a fairy large chuck of cash, if different per sate and also by how serious your crimes were, on average I hear it's around $2000, you sent it in with paperwork, and I think it's part judge and possibly theirs who look it over, see what your total crimes are and if not that many or that bad, then you get paperwork restoringvyou rights to have firearms again. There is a smaller simmer process to be allowed to vote again as well. Of course, the fee I don't believe is anywhere as high as the firearm. I found this out yearsxago, my best friend brother got into trouble, and then this in a nut she'll all I was told. I were actual gone and researched it real well, so feel free to if you want to know everything.

    • @goldenglowmaster8510
      @goldenglowmaster8510 20 днів тому +3

      @@donaldmarwitz2046 I was making a statement that stripping felons of the 2nd ammendment somehow negates their constitutional right to bear arms.

    • @donaldmarwitz2046
      @donaldmarwitz2046 19 днів тому

      @goldenglowmaster8510 Ahh , see where you were going a bit more.

    • @taylorduchinski142
      @taylorduchinski142 16 днів тому +1

      @@goldenglowmaster8510 its an interesting question to which i rebuttal why can any other of a criminals rights be depraved once convicted (put in jail for instance). The main point there is convicted. another point i want to make is that unlike any other country (to my knowledge) the US constitution does not give us the right to have firearms it forbids the government from infringing on our right to do so, thus implying that the right is "inalienable" (as is also explicitly stated). this seams to be a common misconception. (i am not a lawyer this is not advice and i know nothing )

  • @TheSmokingHatManSeesYou
    @TheSmokingHatManSeesYou 4 дні тому +2

    He needs to be released, this is our constitutional right!! That judge needs to be in federal prison!

  • @Nicholas-jy4df
    @Nicholas-jy4df Місяць тому +889

    Everything is illegal in New York. This man is innocent, release him.

    • @polypolar
      @polypolar Місяць тому

      except illegal immigration

    • @brooklyn_geek
      @brooklyn_geek Місяць тому +8

      Marijuana is legal😂😂😂

    • @davidoceans5604
      @davidoceans5604 Місяць тому

      😅😅😅😅😅 Lol

    • @juanchapa1752
      @juanchapa1752 Місяць тому +11

      You should get 10 years mandatory minimum for ghost guns and similar penalties for gun trafficking. Also if your caught with a stolen gun 10 years go buy your gun through the legal channels.

    • @SamsungJ-xk9pt
      @SamsungJ-xk9pt Місяць тому

      He's not a Democrat voter unlike the illegal migrants, so he must stay in prison.

  • @BxRomeo_Killuminati
    @BxRomeo_Killuminati Місяць тому +57

    Shall not be infringed!!!!!!!!!!

    • @kentony7672
      @kentony7672 24 дні тому +1

      He should've moved to upstate where is mostly within sheriff jurisdiction he could be much safer.

  • @seenamoon5804
    @seenamoon5804 Місяць тому +451

    He's fighting a battle for all of us. May justice amd the right to bare arms, prevail. Thank you for your sacrifice🙏🏾

    • @marcelcharette265
      @marcelcharette265 Місяць тому +6

      Do you need a tank and a B-52 bomber to go along with your gun? Will that make you feel safe?

    • @444_vodka
      @444_vodka Місяць тому +13

      @@marcelcharette265typical liberal, braindead response trying to incite nonsensical arguments.

    • @marcelcharette265
      @marcelcharette265 Місяць тому

      @@EverythingHoops7705 How far do we need to go for people like yourself to feel safe? Are you that afraid to offer your opinion, without a gun to back you?

    • @smallpeople172
      @smallpeople172 Місяць тому +4

      @@marcelcharette265as a progressive that is a member of the socialist rifle association, yes you should be able to own those.

    • @Ike_of_pyke
      @Ike_of_pyke Місяць тому +2

      @@marcelcharette265 it's not about if I feel safe , you can legally own a tank and bomber but the bomber will need to be registered to fly in US Airspace

  • @mwwwww648
    @mwwwww648 12 днів тому +7

    A big firm could knock this case out of the park, especially if they went to the supreme court

  • @savevsdeath
    @savevsdeath Місяць тому +426

    He did have every right to have them. His rights are being violated.

    • @donwyoming1936
      @donwyoming1936 Місяць тому +5

      Guess again. State's have rights as well.

    • @nathanrogers8400
      @nathanrogers8400 Місяць тому

      The people are the state his constitutional rights are clearly being violated😢​@@donwyoming1936

    • @deionvaldes9937
      @deionvaldes9937 Місяць тому +21

      @@donwyoming1936 states don’t get to override constitutional rights

    • @melvinflint9714
      @melvinflint9714 Місяць тому

      Yall are sick and don't give af about nobody fr! Where you think them guns gonna end up if anyone could make em ? A high school mass shooting maybe ? In the streets ? How bout we start giving af about people instead of trying to sound n b cool all the time

    • @trackman7333
      @trackman7333 Місяць тому +8

      @@donwyoming1936 10th Amendment - Reserved Powers
      The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
      The 2nd, 4th, 9th & 14th Amendments are clear, the Federal, State or Local government can Not make laws the violate those rights nor any other in the Bill of Rights.

  • @kmalcolm5336
    @kmalcolm5336 Місяць тому +58

    Release this man

  • @laudableplain4282
    @laudableplain4282 28 днів тому +132

    Same goverment that traded the "Merchant of Death💀💣👹" for a Amateur basket ball player ⛹️‍♀️🏀

    • @BK_1993
      @BK_1993 25 днів тому +3

      facts

    • @Metamorphosis-hb8mr
      @Metamorphosis-hb8mr 23 дні тому +1

      Amateur? She has multiple gold medals, plays pro ball, and is the only woman I've ever seen dunk in a game.

    • @jarredcunningham2076
      @jarredcunningham2076 20 днів тому

      ​@Metamorphosis-hb8mr are you that oblivious? That's a man, baby! You didn't know " they" are trans??? 😂😂😂

    • @joegevorkyan7308
      @joegevorkyan7308 19 днів тому

      Regardless. Don’t cling to words. A basketball player exchanged for one the world’s largest arms supplier, that sold weapons used against American troops. Marines were left to rot, but this dumb@$$ who clearly knew its illegal in Russia thought she’d walk? She was being held in Russia for breaking Russian law. I smoke too, but I respect the law of any land I travel too… and have enough discipline not to smoke for a few days.

    • @chips1327
      @chips1327 18 днів тому +10

      @@Metamorphosis-hb8mr bro non of that makes it ANY better… the dude was named the merchant of death for gosh sake … vrs a girl who dunks a ball…

  • @almostontimehero5415
    @almostontimehero5415 17 днів тому +6

    So the guy is smart, an engineer and loves to build firearms. Whats the crime?

    • @mghegotagun
      @mghegotagun 14 днів тому +1

      Possession of firearms without the permission of his rulers, which needless to say, shouldn't be a crime, and is only something you'd see in a place like NYC or cali. Remember what those states vote for.

    • @wallclock4648
      @wallclock4648 10 днів тому +1

      Living in NYC

  • @Hardhands
    @Hardhands Місяць тому +172

    The law can be bullies

    • @UniShuoi-e6z
      @UniShuoi-e6z Місяць тому +17

      Its tyrannical at this point

    • @Tortilla.Reform
      @Tortilla.Reform Місяць тому

      You should look up Slushy Gate, David Mascarella, Zachary Wester, Houston Tipping, Tyre Nichols, and Cariol Horne

    • @tommyzelle1312
      @tommyzelle1312 Місяць тому

      @@UniShuoi-e6zyep flip it as you want

    • @SM-si5
      @SM-si5 Місяць тому +5

      They usually are

    • @bornpsychopath2996
      @bornpsychopath2996 Місяць тому +5

      F ,, the LAW

  • @enarush1
    @enarush1 Місяць тому +518

    Biggest mistake he made was living in New York. I hope when he gets out, he moves out of state.

    • @republicansaretheenemy
      @republicansaretheenemy Місяць тому

      yeah, he needs to live in a republican state where they get turned on by school shootings

    • @Abdul-o7q5l
      @Abdul-o7q5l Місяць тому +30

      Then when he moves to another state he'll be telling people "Im from New York, I'm from Nww York " a thousand times a day.

    • @FCm-tq2ho
      @FCm-tq2ho Місяць тому +7

      Sure once he completes his 20 years 😂

    • @MackDre-d3b
      @MackDre-d3b Місяць тому +5

      So we should just any rando make gun parts at home. How does this help law and order

    • @MackDre-d3b
      @MackDre-d3b Місяць тому +9

      If you think he wasn't selling these things in the streets you're blind.

  • @Mittenpaw
    @Mittenpaw Місяць тому +244

    He has the right to own and posses self manufactured firearms

    • @kuatojones6950
      @kuatojones6950 Місяць тому +7

      I'm calling bs, if I made a sawed off shotgun in my garage I would go to prison.

    • @jewmanchoolee466
      @jewmanchoolee466 Місяць тому +15

      You sound like a good german citizen in the late 1930s 👢👅
      The NFA and GCA prohibit SBRs and full auto firearms (unconstitutionally that is) and he didnt own anything that falls under those regulations. However looking at the Bill of rights under text and tradition (which is how SCOTUS makes their rulings on the 2A) it has always been legal for a person to make and own their own firearm, only recently states started passing these crooked laws

    • @offdeadeye88
      @offdeadeye88 Місяць тому +15

      @@kuatojones6950 that is not creating a firearm, that is modifying a existing one…. At least get the basics right. And it should be perfectly legal, the difference between a 20 inch and 18 inch barrel?

    • @river_rat1788
      @river_rat1788 Місяць тому +3

      @@kuatojones6950 only if you took a already made shot gun made by a manufacture turning it into a SBS but its legal for you to make a 1 inch barrel shotgun if thats what u want

    • @RetirementFund750
      @RetirementFund750 Місяць тому +3

      @@kuatojones6950you can manufacture guns but they still have to meet certain criteria like you can build a ar15 but you can’t make it a sbr or full auto because that would make it illegal. But it’s perfectly legal to make a ar15 semi auto rifle or pistol. You can also build a shotgun but it has to meet the length requirements just like a bought one.

  • @rodolfolopezduran2320
    @rodolfolopezduran2320 18 днів тому +8

    State law shouldn’t over power federal law.. it’s even worse when it infringes on your constitutional rights.

  • @SgtJoeSmith
    @SgtJoeSmith Місяць тому +203

    Atf says he broke no federal law

    • @bokc_nonpopularsalt1011
      @bokc_nonpopularsalt1011 Місяць тому +27

      We know because you see no ATF officers.

    • @Theonetruegod-hw2ei
      @Theonetruegod-hw2ei Місяць тому

      Yes he has. Republicans are domestic terrorist.

    • @EmmanuelTheodore
      @EmmanuelTheodore Місяць тому +7

      @@bokc_nonpopularsalt1011 And because he faces no federal charges

    • @boldpredictionssports
      @boldpredictionssports Місяць тому +13

      ​@@EmmanuelTheodorebecause he broke no federal laws.

    • @TheObeyMayhem
      @TheObeyMayhem Місяць тому

      @@boldpredictionssports Bill of rights TRUMPS ALL STATE LAWS. The states still have to follow the Constitution of the United States and the bill of rights. They can make laws within their state and rule themselves so long as they follow the rules laid out for them in the bill of rights. The bill of rights doesn't give anyone rights, it protects their natural god given ones from government infringement, keep that in mind. Our government, state and federal, is breaking the rules we told them to follow, that is TYRANY.

  • @MrTheguywiththemoney
    @MrTheguywiththemoney Місяць тому +162

    The bill of rights can NOT be superseded, you either modify or remove it. Those are the two options.

    • @Mr_Originality
      @Mr_Originality Місяць тому +5

      It can’t be modified either

    • @jewmanchoolee466
      @jewmanchoolee466 Місяць тому +13

      It can be, hence why its called an ammendment. However all gun control is illegal at this point in time under the plain text of the 2A. So are knife laws and any other weapon laws.
      People often say "if you have an issues with it talk to your legislaters" "go through the proper channels" "its common sense"
      Meanwhile the gov have erroded the framework of the government and passed illegal laws. That violate the Bill of rights. Permit to protest or peacefully assemble 1A. permits to carry 2A, I cannot think of any 3A violations. The NSA spying on americans without a warrent 4A, police using dirty tactics to make illegal arrests and convictions 5A. Making people wait for months or years in jail for their trial to end 6A. I cannot think of any 7A violations. Throwing the book at whistleblowes like Edward snowden for uncovering illegal acts that the feds have done 8A. The SCOTUS ignoring the 9A (they have never made a ruling based only on the 9A) and only using it as a supporting ammendent in conjuction with other Enumerated rights. Finally the 10A has been violated as any power that has not been given to the Federal gov is reserved to the states or people, yet the Feds keep taking more and more power (they take this power in the shadows through 3 letter federal agencies)

    • @nomenclature9373
      @nomenclature9373 Місяць тому

      Two SCOTUS cases will decide this. One just heard deals with whether ATF can regulate and require registration in states requiring registration. The discussion compared ingredients for an omelet and a Hellofresh meal kit to individual ghost gun parts and ghost gun kits. The second that applies is the Heller ruling. SCOTUS affirmed the right to keep a firearm in a residence, BUT 2A was NOT unlimited.

    • @FatbobRell
      @FatbobRell Місяць тому

      10th amendment.

    • @TheObeyMayhem
      @TheObeyMayhem Місяць тому +6

      @@jewmanchoolee466 We have a tyrannical government's in every state as well as at the federal level. I know it's from a movie but Mel Gibson did say "An elected legislature can trample a man's rights as easily as a king can". Tyranny doesn't just take one form, it takes all forms.

  • @OnkyoGrady
    @OnkyoGrady Місяць тому +46

    This man's imprisonment is disgusting, and the prosecutor and judge are an utter disgrace for how they handled this. Not an intentional criminal, no ill will, no victim, no likely future victim, and an extremely sketchy statue behind it. Even if they felt obliged to publicly enforce the new law, picking this defendant and leveling a die in jail sentence is too much. Just disgusting people who warrant no respect

  • @TheSmokingHatManSeesYou
    @TheSmokingHatManSeesYou 4 дні тому +1

    He needs to be released, this is our constitutional right!!

  • @wood-wheel-wizard
    @wood-wheel-wizard Місяць тому +137

    Definitely violating his rights, it’s your 2nd amendment right to build your own. People have been doing it for centuries. It’s when you sell them question can arise.

    • @caelonmiller1957
      @caelonmiller1957 Місяць тому +2

      You should be able to sell them to anyone too!

  • @keyboard_crip
    @keyboard_crip Місяць тому +233

    This is going to turn into a movie

  • @tvviewer4500
    @tvviewer4500 Місяць тому +314

    Assembling guns is not illegal and any law against it is unconstitutional

    • @62Cristoforo
      @62Cristoforo Місяць тому +13

      No, but possessing them IS illegal. And he’s smart enough to know this. He’s GUILTY.

    • @kuatojones6950
      @kuatojones6950 Місяць тому +7

      You may as well just tell people to etch off the serial numbers of their guns since it's their own property lol I swear the people that actually care about gun rights aren't smart enough to do anything about it.

    • @tvviewer4500
      @tvviewer4500 Місяць тому +18

      @@kuatojones6950 these is zero reason to have serial numbers on guns

    • @tvviewer4500
      @tvviewer4500 Місяць тому +16

      @@62Cristoforo how can it be illegal? Don’t you know what the second amendment is?

    • @joeypeeps22
      @joeypeeps22 Місяць тому +2

      ​@@kuatojones6950you make mo sense but okay bud

  • @yankypollak
    @yankypollak День тому +1

    This guy should be free

  • @alecboi84
    @alecboi84 Місяць тому +122

    “No state shall convert a liberty into a
    license, and charge a fee therefore:' (Murdock v.
    Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105)
    "If the State converts a right (liberty) into
    a privilege, the citizen can ignore the license
    and fee and engage in the right (liberty) with
    impunity." (Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham,
    Alabama, 373 U.S. 262)
    Americans moved away from educating themselves to being overly entertained. Most people could tell you everything there is about their favorite football/baseball team and player but can’t name 5 of their Constitutional rights or their amendments. Our rights are like muscles. If you don’t use them, you lose them.
    If the average person knew what I knew about how far the government has veered from the Constitution and what it’s actually done and still is doing, there’d probably be a revolution overnight

    • @Tortilla.Reform
      @Tortilla.Reform Місяць тому +6

      You perfectly described the trump supporters who conveniently ignore the fact that he literally said he would terminate parts of the Constitution, to stay in power after he lost in 2020

    • @GrantDWilliams82
      @GrantDWilliams82 Місяць тому +6

      @@Tortilla.ReformHe never said that, and the Constitution gives the Vice President every right to decline to certify the results of the election.

    • @killapain
      @killapain Місяць тому

      @@Tortilla.Reform you sound like a robot reading a script😑

    • @Tortilla.Reform
      @Tortilla.Reform Місяць тому

      @@GrantDWilliams82 He literally said that, why are you being dishonest with the classic maga “fake news” excuse. It’s a fact, you can easily look it up instead of being dismissive because you worship trump. And if you’re correct, why didn’t Pence follow trumps fake electors scheme?

    • @nomenclature9373
      @nomenclature9373 Місяць тому +3

      Try Heller. The court affirmed the right to have a firearm in a residence it also said 2A is not unlimited, allowing for regulation. The recently heard Vanderstok case challenges specifically regulation of ghost guns, parts and kits. The court compared ingredients for an omelet and a Hellofresh meal kit to individual ghost gun parts and ghost gun kits.

  • @898792
    @898792 Місяць тому +107

    He's fighting for the rights of every other gun owner!

    • @mikeb5664
      @mikeb5664 Місяць тому

      He broke state law, and will lose.

    • @star9732
      @star9732 Місяць тому +4

      @@mikeb5664if his case ever makes it to the Supreme Court he most likely will win on the grounds that historically there were no laws in place prohibiting someone from making their own firearms. Per SCOTUS (Bruen) government can no longer make public interest arguments in defense of state laws. Once the second amendment is implicated only history and tradition matters.

    • @thestcroixkid
      @thestcroixkid Місяць тому +1

      ​@@mikeb5664you are going to feel immensely stupid when this all hashes out...

  • @nonoback22
    @nonoback22 Місяць тому +56

    Free Him

  • @mitchblackwood
    @mitchblackwood День тому +1

    of course he has the right to own everything and anything he wants this is a FREE country!!

  • @L.Ron.Hoyabembe
    @L.Ron.Hoyabembe Місяць тому +50

    Acquit. Nothing wrong with owning firearms.

  • @NoMoreTrickPlays
    @NoMoreTrickPlays Місяць тому +24

    Maximum security prison for not harming anyone? Maybe not even firing them? what..

  • @NYRM1974
    @NYRM1974 Місяць тому +87

    I'm sorry that the constitutional professor is totally incorrect. In the cases of Heller as well as the case of bruin supreme Court made it a fundamental right to keep and bear arms at your place of residence the brewing case made it a fundamental right to bear arms outside of the home. But New York City and New York state law does not overshadow federal law for the supreme Court's ruling makes ownership of a firearm a fundamental right. This is going to be an interesting case in federal court. This may be the new catalyst for constitutional carry

    • @reecethe
      @reecethe Місяць тому

      I think its more to with the fact that they're Ghost guns. do you think you know more than a Law Professor? 😂😂😂

    • @FizCap
      @FizCap Місяць тому +14

      @@reecetheconstitution says nothing about ghost guns, says your right to bear arms shall not be infringed. Professors can be wrong to, law is up to interpretation

    • @lynch6642
      @lynch6642 Місяць тому

      ​@@reecetheNo, it has more to do with your DA trying to prove a point.... The blue States are indeed taking our guns...

    • @NYRM1974
      @NYRM1974 Місяць тому +2

      @@reecethe yes I do..... Self manufactured firearms have been around since before the revolution. The moniker ghost guns what's the term coined by the stupid media. In an effort to sensationalize self manufactured firearms. There is no variable that can be applied to factual law. The supreme Court the highest court of the land made it a fundamental right in its ruling on the 2nd Amendment. The left-wing ideology always wants to find some rhyme or reason to whittle out an unconstitutional restriction against law-abiding citizens.

    • @nomenclature9373
      @nomenclature9373 Місяць тому

      The recently heard Vanderstok case is about ghost gun regulation. The discussion compared ingredients for an omelet and a Hellofresh meal kit to individual ghost gun parts and ghost gun kits.

  • @punkgothic999
    @punkgothic999 День тому +1

    His constitutional rights are being violated. Building your own firearms is part of the right to bear arms. A homemade firearm is a bearable arm.

  • @AroundtheWayJ
    @AroundtheWayJ Місяць тому +46

    #FreeDexterTaylor

  • @runfatboyrun9435
    @runfatboyrun9435 Місяць тому +27

    Right to bear arms. Cannot be infringed by any state.

    • @dragonf1092
      @dragonf1092 23 дні тому +1

      Yep
      14th amendment section 1 Text.
      No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the united states

  • @partiallyhuman
    @partiallyhuman Місяць тому +53

    That lady said the bill has limits not true

    • @icelandviking1961
      @icelandviking1961 Місяць тому +4

      That confusing part that says “Shall NOT be infringed” may have tripped her up.

    • @thestcroixkid
      @thestcroixkid Місяць тому +3

      ​@@icelandviking1961leftists do every time...

    • @bubbajones4522
      @bubbajones4522 28 днів тому

      She's a socialist POS which is why we have the 2nd Amendment.

  • @LearnHowToSquabble
    @LearnHowToSquabble 16 днів тому +4

    It's the same thing with marijuana. If they can't tax it, you can't grow it. Just like firearms. They can't tax if you make your own firearms.. this world is always about greed

  • @drjekelmrhyde
    @drjekelmrhyde Місяць тому +178

    If he wasn't selling them, then let him go.

    • @dan-sc7fm
      @dan-sc7fm Місяць тому +20

      Ghost guns are illegal. No registration. He resides in the state. He will lose and will get prison time as he should.

    • @dopelitonlyone2905
      @dopelitonlyone2905 Місяць тому +2

      ​@@dan-sc7fm*Truth That."*

    • @arialesposito-xz8ng
      @arialesposito-xz8ng Місяць тому

      Why cuz hes black

    • @the0ne809
      @the0ne809 Місяць тому

      Bro, you can get a nuke, right? that is a weapon. You should try to get one.

    • @durk30s89
      @durk30s89 Місяць тому +53

      @@dan-sc7fm thanks for telling us you're a homosexual nice to know

  • @1CoupedeTat
    @1CoupedeTat Місяць тому +100

    she deliberately left out the 'shall not be infringed' part and mentioned interest balancing instead, interest balancing is already ruled on as inapplicable by the supreme court

    • @bobroberts2371
      @bobroberts2371 Місяць тому +3

      said " 'shall not be infringed' "
      Does a violent mentally ill person that has been involuntary committed to a mental institution have the inalienable right to possess arms? What about someone that is on a 72 hour hold? Either Shall Not is absolute or ,under certain circumstances, it can be infringed on. Pick a side, what can be more simple than a Yes or NO?

    • @1CoupedeTat
      @1CoupedeTat Місяць тому +2

      first off, you presented a false dichotomy, in each of those examples you gave the individuals are in custody or not in control of themselves and thus become a ward of the court.
      there is no way to rule over free men until they run afoul of the law...do you know the rest? hint, atlas shrugged.

    • @bobroberts2371
      @bobroberts2371 Місяць тому +5

      @@1CoupedeTat But 2A SPECIFICALLY states " Shall not be infringed " this means under no circumstances and this statement overrides ALL other regulations. Do any other amendments state " shall not be infringed"?

    • @1CoupedeTat
      @1CoupedeTat Місяць тому

      You and i are in agreement but there is other preceeding text that establishes a proper context for what i stated

    • @nitegoat1369
      @nitegoat1369 Місяць тому +2

      @@bobroberts2371If you’re too dangerous to own/possess firearms, you should be locked away from society. If you are a free person, you are allowed to exercise your unalienable right to keep and bear arms - end of story. Your rights are not granted to you by the Constitution or by government; you are born with these rights, which are enumerated in The Constitution.

  • @artvandelay9201
    @artvandelay9201 20 днів тому +3

    This is disgusting. The officers who raided that man's house should be ashamed of themselves. They are just as bad as the lawmakers who sent them.

  • @robinberg3888
    @robinberg3888 Місяць тому +28

    People are being trafficked every single day, but this is what they wanna focus on what you’re doing in your home! Clean that swamp!!

    • @geigertec5921
      @geigertec5921 Місяць тому

      J Edgar Hoover went after small town bank robbers as the Mafia was puppeteering senators.

  • @CherryBlossomOhka
    @CherryBlossomOhka Місяць тому +28

    "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" Memorize it. It doesnt give you the right to own a gun it takes away the Governments right to take them away from you.

    • @ASquadWiper
      @ASquadWiper 26 днів тому

      you left out a few lines but ok 😂

  • @AmEastside116st
    @AmEastside116st Місяць тому +51

    This is sooooooo sad he should not be in prison this man should be free!!!!

  • @journeyman378
    @journeyman378 16 днів тому +2

    The right of the people to keep and bare arms shall not be infringed.

  • @paladin4779
    @paladin4779 Місяць тому +11

    The judge needs to be thrown in jail.

  • @thatsgluebaby
    @thatsgluebaby Місяць тому +22

    We all know why he's in jail! 💔🇺🇲

    • @geigertec5921
      @geigertec5921 Місяць тому

      ✊🏿🇺🇸 They don't respect the 2nd amendment or the 4th amendment. Why would we assume they respect the 13th?

  • @BajatheChickenMan
    @BajatheChickenMan Місяць тому +11

    SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!!!

  • @N_o_ah
    @N_o_ah День тому +1

    This is awful

  • @Aitv-y7k
    @Aitv-y7k Місяць тому +38

    Human rights are unalienable

  • @politicsuncensored5617
    @politicsuncensored5617 Місяць тому +110

    If we had this kind of gov. 250 years ago we would never have won The Revolutionary War.

    • @mg-by7uu
      @mg-by7uu Місяць тому +12

      That's the point

    • @chaoticpinktacos4211
      @chaoticpinktacos4211 Місяць тому +3

      1812 treaty of Ghent, look it up

    • @aaronwilson4258
      @aaronwilson4258 Місяць тому +7

      This is the type of government we had 250 years ago. Then the people rose up and ended the tyranny.

    • @Yarnover_PullThrough
      @Yarnover_PullThrough Місяць тому +1

      @@politicsuncensored5617 but we don’t live in that time now do we? Those laws were for a different time and space. It’s 2024…we don’t need to defend our land against the British. We have the military land air and sea. Murders by guns are on the rise. Only in AMERICA do we have to worry about people shooting up a place like elementary schools colleges high schools concerts clubs movies postal office. People with legally owned guns people with ghost guns, mental health issues, no mental health issues that snapped out of no where….murdering innocent people with guns! He isn’t a cop, he isn’t in the military…what if he decided to snap after something life changing happens? What will someone say then?

    • @politicsuncensored5617
      @politicsuncensored5617 Місяць тому +4

      @@Yarnover_PullThrough Not the British, but our own federal is the danger today.

  • @dinkeeinvestmentsllc6428
    @dinkeeinvestmentsllc6428 Місяць тому +58

    Where is the NRA

    • @kingras6927
      @kingras6927 Місяць тому +37

      He’s Black

    • @polypolar
      @polypolar Місяць тому

      NRA is a scam

    • @lynch6642
      @lynch6642 Місяць тому

      They did the same thing to the NRA they did to Trump, Forbidden to do business in New York

    • @tonymo5231
      @tonymo5231 Місяць тому +12

      It means Not Really for Africans.

    • @geigertec5921
      @geigertec5921 Місяць тому

      Call them and stop pretending you are just a casual observer to this story. You think you can't become a part of it yourself. People in the NRA aren't omnipresent especially when it comes to matters in New York City - a place that hates them where they have little presence.

  • @wallclock4648
    @wallclock4648 10 днів тому +1

    If you like firearms, DONT live in NYC. In VA it’s completely legal to manufacture your own weapon unless you intent to sell it

  • @USBlues
    @USBlues Місяць тому +71

    NY is it's own country.

    • @SM-si5
      @SM-si5 Місяць тому +8

      Worst place ever

    • @johnli25
      @johnli25 Місяць тому +6

      Every state is literally a country. Each unique

    • @joe-id5pb
      @joe-id5pb Місяць тому

      More like a degenerate cesspool.

    • @CaalamusTube
      @CaalamusTube Місяць тому

      No, NY is a Red State with a gangrenous foot, that has spread to a few spots further up the body.

    • @mghegotagun
      @mghegotagun 14 днів тому

      ​@@johnli25
      Some uniquely awful and should be relegated to the bottom of the Atlantic

  • @edwinsane3769
    @edwinsane3769 27 днів тому +9

    This is injustice to the extreme! I’ve never called for anyone to be freed than this individual, my brother in arms!

  • @ANGRY_BUS_DRIVER
    @ANGRY_BUS_DRIVER Місяць тому +74

    I hope president Trump pardons this guy

    • @darrellglover2180
      @darrellglover2180 Місяць тому

      He won’t get pardoned by trump because he is black. Let’s see.

    • @BloodGangBrazy
      @BloodGangBrazy Місяць тому

      You mean the guy who instituted the bump stock ban turning hundreds of thousands of Americans into felons overnight for owning a piece of plastic? Trump is anything but pro-freedom.

    • @armadillolover99
      @armadillolover99 Місяць тому +4

      Unfortunately that would do Dexter no good, because the president can only pardon people for federal crimes. Dexter was convicted under New York State law and thus can only be pardoned by the governor of New York.

    • @inukithesavage828
      @inukithesavage828 29 днів тому

      @@armadillolover99 That is deeply frustrating, and seems like it was designed to be a work-around.

    • @brosrcool
      @brosrcool 29 днів тому

      Me to

  • @Thedunguen9999
    @Thedunguen9999 12 днів тому +1

    Free that man. His right are being infringed on.

  • @NotNiceLeeK
    @NotNiceLeeK Місяць тому +91

    He's in the wrong state for that

  • @donvisn
    @donvisn Місяць тому +34

    Damn hope he gets home soon 🙏🏾❤️

  • @Bertintremors
    @Bertintremors Місяць тому +24

    Hes right. Our rights are higher then any law put in place to hinder them.

  • @jeromecrockett2311
    @jeromecrockett2311 12 днів тому +1

    Bro in the wrong state
    He's that intelligent you was welcomed in Texas brother

  • @Sly_MaC
    @Sly_MaC Місяць тому +36

    Imagine if a judge said " The 14th Amendment doesn't exist in this court." Would you be so willing to give up someones rights then?

    • @thestcroixkid
      @thestcroixkid Місяць тому +3

      Agreed...or the 1st...it's CRAZY.

  • @kerrybaker371
    @kerrybaker371 Місяць тому +18

    He’s going to prison for exercising his constitutional rights! Free him!

  • @mizaqenyad4269
    @mizaqenyad4269 Місяць тому +78

    Absolutely disgusting how they treated him in that search.

    • @blahblahblah-fo6xn
      @blahblahblah-fo6xn Місяць тому +7

      Both parties were respectful and dignified. Try again

    • @sheldoneuos
      @sheldoneuos Місяць тому +10

      @@blahblahblah-fo6xn why don’t you explain how they were respectful and dignified? They arrested an innocent man.

    • @SpaceRanger187
      @SpaceRanger187 Місяць тому

      yet they do nothing about all the illegals robbing people and all the people with glock switches which are illegal.. but this dude is the issue

    • @JamesWilliams-gp6ek
      @JamesWilliams-gp6ek Місяць тому +2

      @@sheldoneuos He stated in the interview that the police were respectful during the search. When they have a warrant they don't knock.

  • @dannypierce1426
    @dannypierce1426 14 днів тому +1

    Shall not be infringed? So any gun control law is infringement that’s it

  • @AndrewJMar
    @AndrewJMar Місяць тому +72

    "The right to bear arms shall not be infringed" that means no limits

    • @nomenclature9373
      @nomenclature9373 Місяць тому +2

      “Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited. [It is] not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.” -- Justice Scalia in writing for the majority in the Heller case.

    • @budm2528
      @budm2528 Місяць тому +1

      soooo...nuclear weapons? IED's? What is YOUR interpretation of the 2nd?

    • @crypticnomad
      @crypticnomad Місяць тому +1

      ​@@Callsign_Sturm People often forget that it's all interpretations, and they often fail to include the entire text of the Second Amendment. The actual Second Amendment clearly mentions militias, but the U.S. Supreme Court in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) interpreted that the right to bear arms is an individual right, not contingent on service in a militia. So, is the "random appointed person" interpreting that it isn’t contingent on militia service correct, but somehow the interpretation that it is not unlimited is wrong? Is that your interpretation? Is your interpretation somehow more correct than the U.S. Supreme Court’s interpretation, and if so, please explain how it is.

    • @crypticnomad
      @crypticnomad Місяць тому +1

      To be clear, I personally don't see anything wrong with what he was doing. If it was illegal, then there is something wrong with the law. They cite "increased risk to police" often as a reason for making what he was doing illegal, but that is simply a rhetorical argument. The risk of injury from a weapon with serial numbers is no less than one without. If someone files off the serial numbers, does that logically imply that the weapon is somehow more dangerous than before? Obviously not, and that means it isn't a "public safety issue" but instead "it makes the job harder for police in some extremely rare cases." I doubt that is justification enough for banning the practice if we view it objectively and don't allow rhetorical arguments to seep into the debate.
      Still, I think people should actually read the Constitution and try to understand it in context. Don't just take what other people say and assume it's true without critically engaging with what is being said.

    • @AndrewJMar
      @AndrewJMar Місяць тому

      @nomenclature9373 "The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." That is pretty clear. I don't see anything about limits in that statement.

  • @jamorgan2740
    @jamorgan2740 Місяць тому +29

    I respect and appreciate this man for standing on his beliefs and his RIGHTS. To hear an officer say “ keep a gun on him” when he surrendered peacefully is crazy.If he was not a threat and peaceful why keep the unnecessary use of force? Hopefully he is released as soon as possible.

  • @randomstonerrants5004
    @randomstonerrants5004 Місяць тому +47

    Sadly enough we apparently only abide by the constitution when the government says its fit to lol. I commend this man for standing up for 2A rights.

  • @GumbyBro
    @GumbyBro 20 днів тому +3

    Hopefully TRUMP pardons this American, Patriotic Man and puts the Judge and those responsible for violating an Americans rights in the same prison he was in, but for 2x the time he’s was sentenced for, because that judge and law enforcement should know better, it’s their job to know.

  • @AndrewJMar
    @AndrewJMar Місяць тому +37

    Building your own guns has never been illegal in the United States. Selling them is.

    • @blakedavis2447
      @blakedavis2447 27 днів тому +1

      Selling them shouldn’t be illegal either

    • @AppalachianMountaineer1863
      @AppalachianMountaineer1863 24 дні тому

      Not even selling them is illegal, you just have to make sure they retain a serial number and the manufacturer has an FFL (which granted shouldn’t need one)

    • @blakedavis2447
      @blakedavis2447 24 дні тому

      @@AppalachianMountaineer1863 I should be able to make and sell guns without a serial number.

    • @AndrewJMar
      @AndrewJMar 24 дні тому

      @AppalachianMountaineer1863 I am pretty sure self-made guns can not be sold to anyone but the government. Anyone is allowed to build guns. To sell them you have to get the ffl. But that only covers serialized guns, which a homemade gun won't have. With the ffl, though, you can apply for an expansion that allows you to build automatic firearms for R&D. In that case, you can submit your guns for government contracts bids. That is my understanding, anyway. Still seems my right to bear arms is pretty infringed. And all my tax money is used for corruption

  • @angelpapi007
    @angelpapi007 Місяць тому +48

    The man is totally right...but when the law is lawless,....well here you see what happens.

    • @republicansaretheenemy
      @republicansaretheenemy Місяць тому

      keep crying LOL

    • @SpaceRanger187
      @SpaceRanger187 Місяць тому

      At least they didn't shoot his dog and kid. Yall sure do forget so easy. At least it wasn't you so oh well, back to your phones

  • @davidbell4986
    @davidbell4986 Місяць тому +4

    Shall NOT be infringed. What is unclear about that?

    • @PodcastClips23969
      @PodcastClips23969 Місяць тому

      Calm down, you can still do it
      It was never meant for blacks, they use guns crimes or sell them to criminals, not for self defense.

  • @paulthomas6816
    @paulthomas6816 24 дні тому +2

    Free this man.

  • @Loveexpressionmachine
    @Loveexpressionmachine Місяць тому +8

    If this man has a clean record, never caused trouble. He has every right to own and build a firearm. Look at the weapons that being sent to Ukraine. A lot of those weapons are being ending up in bad people’s hands. Does that mean the federal government should be investigated for doing that ?