In SoCal yesterday, a gun shop owner told me the DOJ has a live feed into the store and watches/listens to everything. These people fund terrorism abroad, spy on us yet Lord over us violating our rights
well yea it’s a fkn government agency you guys all sound like mick dodges and think you can do whatever you want like this is a constitutional right wen it’s not you can’t own or manufacture guns without serial numbers so if you really think you won’t get in trouble try it and see if you don’t get a gun charge if the cops find it
@@douglemay7989 what cult do you belong too? If you don't follow the constitution as a judge... They're clearly in violation of the oath they laid their hand on a Bible and swore an oath to uphold the constitution and the bill of rights... Check and mate soy boy... What she said and did is completely illegal...
@@MarkTheTreeManVannthis wasn’t a violation of anything. Then everyone can walk around with a ghost gun. Gimme a damn break. People are so full is crap. All of these shootings and for what for a 1700 amendment? The British aren’t coming RELAX!
There is no requirement to have a law degree to run for office as a judge; it's an elected position like any other. The only lifetime appointments are to the state and federal Supreme Courts.
Actually assembling guns at your house isnt illegal. This is a huge violation of his civil rights. This is a multi million dollar civil rights lawsuit.
Had nothing to do with assembling them. He was arrested because he was he was building ghost guns that were also assault weapons. Edit: I love how you uneducated morons keep repeating the same "NO SUCH THING AS AN ASSAULT WEAPON" bs and then when I prove you wrong you stop replying. This is why no one takes the 2A community seriously.
@@cheeko_914Are you accusing him of possessing military rifles or did you mean something else? To clarify: Many politicians and reporters use the term "Assault weapon" for sensationalism, but it is a term without meaning. They apply it to what are functionally the same as hanguns, but with long barrels. This is because they don't want to lie and use a specific term like "Assault rifle", which is an automatic rifle used by the US Army. Those are already illegal to possess without a license and have a legal definition. I ask for clarification because many people have confusion over the meaning due to propganda and I assume you mistyped.
@@KingOdie520 its not that hard to take 10 minutes to google the ny state laws, you should try it... Ghost gun: Penal Law § 265.00(32) specifies that: “ ‘Ghost gun’ means a firearm, rifle or shotgun that does not comply with the provisions of section 265.07 of this article and is not serialized.” Penal Law § 265.00(8-a) defines “serialized” as follows: "Serialized" means bearing a visible identification number and/or symbol in accordance with the requirements imposed on licensed importers and licensed manufacturers pursuant to subsection (i) of Section 923 of Title 18 of the United States Code and regulations issued pursuant thereto in effect at the time of assembly. . . .” Penal Law § 265.07 provides, in relevant part, that “[o]n or before the effective date of this section, and promptly upon taking possession thereof at any time thereafter, any person licensed as a gunsmith, or required to be, or a dealer in firearms pursuant to section 400.00 of this chapter, who is in possession of an unserialized firearm, rifle, shotgun, finished frame or receiver, or unfinished frame or receiver shall: (a) engrave, cast, stamp or otherwise conspicuously place both a unique serial number and his or her name (or recognized abbreviation) on such firearm, rifle, shotgun, finished frame or receiver, or unfinished frame or receiver, in a manner that satisfies or exceeds the requirements imposed on licensed importers and manufacturers pursuant to section (i) of Section 923 of Title 18 of the United States Code and regulations issued pursuant thereto at the time of such assembly.” Assault weapon: The SAFE ACT bans most semi-automatic rifles by making it a felony to possess a semi-automatic rifle with a detachable magazine that has one or more cosmetic features that New York finds undesirable, such as: A folding or adjustable stock A thumbhole stock A pistol grip A bayonet lug A foregrip A flash suppressor A muzzle brake A threaded barrel, or A grenade launcher In addition, semi-automatic handguns are considered assault weapons if they have any one of the following features: A manufactured weight over 50 ounces unloaded A folding or adjustable stock A thumbhole stock A foregrip or second pistol grip A magazine that attaches outside of the pistol grip A barrel shroud, or A threaded barrel Shotguns are considered assault weapons if they are semi-automatic and have any one of the following features: A folding or adjustable stock A thumbhole stock A foregrip or second pistol grip The ability to accept a detachable magazine, or A fixed magazine with a capacity over 7 rounds. Those who owned these “Assault Weapons” before the SAFE Act were required to register them.
@@limbeboy7 I’m in California. State laws allowed home made guns in the past without registered serial numbers. People preferred state laws for marijuana and federal laws for guns. It’s just what’s more convenient.
@@Discovery.2100second amendment. And that right shall not be infringed. The judge said the second amendment doesn't exist in her courtroom, so even the judge agree the Constitution says it she just doesn't like it
@agoodnight1050 the second amendment was about a well regulated militia some dude building guns in a apartment is not what the founding fathers intended.
Always remember they are only there to harass and collect from The law abiding citizens . They never patrio areas that are known to have high crime , they like their job to be easy . For every good cop that upholds his oath their outnumbered 100-1 by guys with chips on the shoulder who break their oath on a daily basis .
All of them in the body cam are Jackboot oath braking thugs... they told him he has a right to remain silent, what about his right to keep and bear arms?
@donwyoming1936 even if so this case could very well reach SCOTUS who would rightly strike this down and establish a clear presedent that im sure would drive you nuts 😂
The constitution does NOT say That your firearm must contain a serial Number!!!!! We the people have the right To bear Arms PERIOD no matter who makes it!!
The search warrant itself was illegal. To establish probable cause the judge would have needed more than reasonable suspicion. If the purchasing of weapon parts itself is not a crime how can it be proof of a crime? Anything found in the search is inadmissible.
Maybe this is on purpose. They know it will get thrown out or they have the option of throwing it out after ruining his life and using up his money while at the same time trying to intimidate anyone else from building “ghost guns”.
100%. Unless he sold one to an undercover agent or was posting about it online with his name/face associated with the postings (highly unlikely) there isn't probable cause here at all. There are tons of people who buy gun parts and P80 lowers etc. Hundreds of thousands if not in the low-millions
`”Ghost guns” isn’t a real term. For almost 200 years building your own firearm was more common than not. I believe it was 1968 when the government said it MUST be serialized, which is in itself un Constitutional.
The serial number is only required if you intend to sell the firearm. Still an illegal infringement, but you can legally make unserialized guns all day.
@ctuesburgable because we have the second amendment law enforcement shouldn't even legally lawfully exist they are contrary to the constitution and freedom and liberty.
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" Regulated is in there, why do you always leave that part out? And that language refers to a nation not personal.
@@ts109 "the right of the people to keep and bare arms" do you think the militias are government owned? They're privately owned and si are their guns even in the revolutionary war alot of people were just farmers with hunting rifles
@@ts109 In 1776, the term "well-regulated" meant that a militia was well-organized, well-armed, and well-disciplined, and was able to fight effectively not regulated in a sense of how we think today by a government body i.e federal or state
@avlawns3037 which is the problem because the constitution applies to all states so having a state thinking they can supercede the constitution with state laws is comical at best. NYC is but a state nothing more.
Your constitutional law professor needs to update herself. There is no more public safety balancing of the law since the Bruen decision. Hope this guy winds up on top.
I was going to make that comment- how is she a law professor?? There are laws at different levels, but the Constitution holds supremacy. You don't pass a law via the legislative branch and then break it "for balance" in the executive/ enforcement or judicial. She basically admitted that she does not know what a law is.
@@mikeb5664 Assault is an act of physical violence. Inanimate objects cannot commit the crime of assault. If I used a sheet to strangle a person would the sheet become an assault style sheet?
Its perfectly clear. What he did was completely legal. No such laws can be made to prevent or supercede the bill of rights and construction. The state of NY has done just that and not by just a little. Its man that sacrifices like him helps pave the way to correcting a big injustice for all. God bless and be safe!❤
@goldenglowmaster8510 You can't have a weapon if you are on parole. It's a bit tricky, really, but it is possible for an ex fellon, but many factors play into it. For example, many non-violent felonies allow for ways people to once again be allowed to carry a weapon. Did you know you're not allowed to vote either, I think that one is so stupid. After some time period you can file a motion leaking to exspung the crime, it normally requires a fairy large chuck of cash, if different per sate and also by how serious your crimes were, on average I hear it's around $2000, you sent it in with paperwork, and I think it's part judge and possibly theirs who look it over, see what your total crimes are and if not that many or that bad, then you get paperwork restoringvyou rights to have firearms again. There is a smaller simmer process to be allowed to vote again as well. Of course, the fee I don't believe is anywhere as high as the firearm. I found this out yearsxago, my best friend brother got into trouble, and then this in a nut she'll all I was told. I were actual gone and researched it real well, so feel free to if you want to know everything.
@@goldenglowmaster8510 its an interesting question to which i rebuttal why can any other of a criminals rights be depraved once convicted (put in jail for instance). The main point there is convicted. another point i want to make is that unlike any other country (to my knowledge) the US constitution does not give us the right to have firearms it forbids the government from infringing on our right to do so, thus implying that the right is "inalienable" (as is also explicitly stated). this seams to be a common misconception. (i am not a lawyer this is not advice and i know nothing )
You should get 10 years mandatory minimum for ghost guns and similar penalties for gun trafficking. Also if your caught with a stolen gun 10 years go buy your gun through the legal channels.
@@EverythingHoops7705 How far do we need to go for people like yourself to feel safe? Are you that afraid to offer your opinion, without a gun to back you?
@@marcelcharette265 it's not about if I feel safe , you can legally own a tank and bomber but the bomber will need to be registered to fly in US Airspace
Yall are sick and don't give af about nobody fr! Where you think them guns gonna end up if anyone could make em ? A high school mass shooting maybe ? In the streets ? How bout we start giving af about people instead of trying to sound n b cool all the time
@@donwyoming1936 10th Amendment - Reserved Powers The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. The 2nd, 4th, 9th & 14th Amendments are clear, the Federal, State or Local government can Not make laws the violate those rights nor any other in the Bill of Rights.
Regardless. Don’t cling to words. A basketball player exchanged for one the world’s largest arms supplier, that sold weapons used against American troops. Marines were left to rot, but this dumb@$$ who clearly knew its illegal in Russia thought she’d walk? She was being held in Russia for breaking Russian law. I smoke too, but I respect the law of any land I travel too… and have enough discipline not to smoke for a few days.
Possession of firearms without the permission of his rulers, which needless to say, shouldn't be a crime, and is only something you'd see in a place like NYC or cali. Remember what those states vote for.
You sound like a good german citizen in the late 1930s 👢👅 The NFA and GCA prohibit SBRs and full auto firearms (unconstitutionally that is) and he didnt own anything that falls under those regulations. However looking at the Bill of rights under text and tradition (which is how SCOTUS makes their rulings on the 2A) it has always been legal for a person to make and own their own firearm, only recently states started passing these crooked laws
@@kuatojones6950 that is not creating a firearm, that is modifying a existing one…. At least get the basics right. And it should be perfectly legal, the difference between a 20 inch and 18 inch barrel?
@@kuatojones6950 only if you took a already made shot gun made by a manufacture turning it into a SBS but its legal for you to make a 1 inch barrel shotgun if thats what u want
@@kuatojones6950you can manufacture guns but they still have to meet certain criteria like you can build a ar15 but you can’t make it a sbr or full auto because that would make it illegal. But it’s perfectly legal to make a ar15 semi auto rifle or pistol. You can also build a shotgun but it has to meet the length requirements just like a bought one.
@@boldpredictionssports Bill of rights TRUMPS ALL STATE LAWS. The states still have to follow the Constitution of the United States and the bill of rights. They can make laws within their state and rule themselves so long as they follow the rules laid out for them in the bill of rights. The bill of rights doesn't give anyone rights, it protects their natural god given ones from government infringement, keep that in mind. Our government, state and federal, is breaking the rules we told them to follow, that is TYRANY.
It can be, hence why its called an ammendment. However all gun control is illegal at this point in time under the plain text of the 2A. So are knife laws and any other weapon laws. People often say "if you have an issues with it talk to your legislaters" "go through the proper channels" "its common sense" Meanwhile the gov have erroded the framework of the government and passed illegal laws. That violate the Bill of rights. Permit to protest or peacefully assemble 1A. permits to carry 2A, I cannot think of any 3A violations. The NSA spying on americans without a warrent 4A, police using dirty tactics to make illegal arrests and convictions 5A. Making people wait for months or years in jail for their trial to end 6A. I cannot think of any 7A violations. Throwing the book at whistleblowes like Edward snowden for uncovering illegal acts that the feds have done 8A. The SCOTUS ignoring the 9A (they have never made a ruling based only on the 9A) and only using it as a supporting ammendent in conjuction with other Enumerated rights. Finally the 10A has been violated as any power that has not been given to the Federal gov is reserved to the states or people, yet the Feds keep taking more and more power (they take this power in the shadows through 3 letter federal agencies)
Two SCOTUS cases will decide this. One just heard deals with whether ATF can regulate and require registration in states requiring registration. The discussion compared ingredients for an omelet and a Hellofresh meal kit to individual ghost gun parts and ghost gun kits. The second that applies is the Heller ruling. SCOTUS affirmed the right to keep a firearm in a residence, BUT 2A was NOT unlimited.
@@jewmanchoolee466 We have a tyrannical government's in every state as well as at the federal level. I know it's from a movie but Mel Gibson did say "An elected legislature can trample a man's rights as easily as a king can". Tyranny doesn't just take one form, it takes all forms.
This man's imprisonment is disgusting, and the prosecutor and judge are an utter disgrace for how they handled this. Not an intentional criminal, no ill will, no victim, no likely future victim, and an extremely sketchy statue behind it. Even if they felt obliged to publicly enforce the new law, picking this defendant and leveling a die in jail sentence is too much. Just disgusting people who warrant no respect
Definitely violating his rights, it’s your 2nd amendment right to build your own. People have been doing it for centuries. It’s when you sell them question can arise.
You may as well just tell people to etch off the serial numbers of their guns since it's their own property lol I swear the people that actually care about gun rights aren't smart enough to do anything about it.
“No state shall convert a liberty into a license, and charge a fee therefore:' (Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105) "If the State converts a right (liberty) into a privilege, the citizen can ignore the license and fee and engage in the right (liberty) with impunity." (Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, Alabama, 373 U.S. 262) Americans moved away from educating themselves to being overly entertained. Most people could tell you everything there is about their favorite football/baseball team and player but can’t name 5 of their Constitutional rights or their amendments. Our rights are like muscles. If you don’t use them, you lose them. If the average person knew what I knew about how far the government has veered from the Constitution and what it’s actually done and still is doing, there’d probably be a revolution overnight
You perfectly described the trump supporters who conveniently ignore the fact that he literally said he would terminate parts of the Constitution, to stay in power after he lost in 2020
@@GrantDWilliams82 He literally said that, why are you being dishonest with the classic maga “fake news” excuse. It’s a fact, you can easily look it up instead of being dismissive because you worship trump. And if you’re correct, why didn’t Pence follow trumps fake electors scheme?
Try Heller. The court affirmed the right to have a firearm in a residence it also said 2A is not unlimited, allowing for regulation. The recently heard Vanderstok case challenges specifically regulation of ghost guns, parts and kits. The court compared ingredients for an omelet and a Hellofresh meal kit to individual ghost gun parts and ghost gun kits.
@@mikeb5664if his case ever makes it to the Supreme Court he most likely will win on the grounds that historically there were no laws in place prohibiting someone from making their own firearms. Per SCOTUS (Bruen) government can no longer make public interest arguments in defense of state laws. Once the second amendment is implicated only history and tradition matters.
I'm sorry that the constitutional professor is totally incorrect. In the cases of Heller as well as the case of bruin supreme Court made it a fundamental right to keep and bear arms at your place of residence the brewing case made it a fundamental right to bear arms outside of the home. But New York City and New York state law does not overshadow federal law for the supreme Court's ruling makes ownership of a firearm a fundamental right. This is going to be an interesting case in federal court. This may be the new catalyst for constitutional carry
@@reecetheconstitution says nothing about ghost guns, says your right to bear arms shall not be infringed. Professors can be wrong to, law is up to interpretation
@@reecethe yes I do..... Self manufactured firearms have been around since before the revolution. The moniker ghost guns what's the term coined by the stupid media. In an effort to sensationalize self manufactured firearms. There is no variable that can be applied to factual law. The supreme Court the highest court of the land made it a fundamental right in its ruling on the 2nd Amendment. The left-wing ideology always wants to find some rhyme or reason to whittle out an unconstitutional restriction against law-abiding citizens.
The recently heard Vanderstok case is about ghost gun regulation. The discussion compared ingredients for an omelet and a Hellofresh meal kit to individual ghost gun parts and ghost gun kits.
Yep 14th amendment section 1 Text. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the united states
It's the same thing with marijuana. If they can't tax it, you can't grow it. Just like firearms. They can't tax if you make your own firearms.. this world is always about greed
she deliberately left out the 'shall not be infringed' part and mentioned interest balancing instead, interest balancing is already ruled on as inapplicable by the supreme court
said " 'shall not be infringed' " Does a violent mentally ill person that has been involuntary committed to a mental institution have the inalienable right to possess arms? What about someone that is on a 72 hour hold? Either Shall Not is absolute or ,under certain circumstances, it can be infringed on. Pick a side, what can be more simple than a Yes or NO?
first off, you presented a false dichotomy, in each of those examples you gave the individuals are in custody or not in control of themselves and thus become a ward of the court. there is no way to rule over free men until they run afoul of the law...do you know the rest? hint, atlas shrugged.
@@1CoupedeTat But 2A SPECIFICALLY states " Shall not be infringed " this means under no circumstances and this statement overrides ALL other regulations. Do any other amendments state " shall not be infringed"?
@@bobroberts2371If you’re too dangerous to own/possess firearms, you should be locked away from society. If you are a free person, you are allowed to exercise your unalienable right to keep and bear arms - end of story. Your rights are not granted to you by the Constitution or by government; you are born with these rights, which are enumerated in The Constitution.
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" Memorize it. It doesnt give you the right to own a gun it takes away the Governments right to take them away from you.
@@politicsuncensored5617 but we don’t live in that time now do we? Those laws were for a different time and space. It’s 2024…we don’t need to defend our land against the British. We have the military land air and sea. Murders by guns are on the rise. Only in AMERICA do we have to worry about people shooting up a place like elementary schools colleges high schools concerts clubs movies postal office. People with legally owned guns people with ghost guns, mental health issues, no mental health issues that snapped out of no where….murdering innocent people with guns! He isn’t a cop, he isn’t in the military…what if he decided to snap after something life changing happens? What will someone say then?
Call them and stop pretending you are just a casual observer to this story. You think you can't become a part of it yourself. People in the NRA aren't omnipresent especially when it comes to matters in New York City - a place that hates them where they have little presence.
You mean the guy who instituted the bump stock ban turning hundreds of thousands of Americans into felons overnight for owning a piece of plastic? Trump is anything but pro-freedom.
Unfortunately that would do Dexter no good, because the president can only pardon people for federal crimes. Dexter was convicted under New York State law and thus can only be pardoned by the governor of New York.
“Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited. [It is] not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.” -- Justice Scalia in writing for the majority in the Heller case.
@@Callsign_Sturm People often forget that it's all interpretations, and they often fail to include the entire text of the Second Amendment. The actual Second Amendment clearly mentions militias, but the U.S. Supreme Court in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) interpreted that the right to bear arms is an individual right, not contingent on service in a militia. So, is the "random appointed person" interpreting that it isn’t contingent on militia service correct, but somehow the interpretation that it is not unlimited is wrong? Is that your interpretation? Is your interpretation somehow more correct than the U.S. Supreme Court’s interpretation, and if so, please explain how it is.
To be clear, I personally don't see anything wrong with what he was doing. If it was illegal, then there is something wrong with the law. They cite "increased risk to police" often as a reason for making what he was doing illegal, but that is simply a rhetorical argument. The risk of injury from a weapon with serial numbers is no less than one without. If someone files off the serial numbers, does that logically imply that the weapon is somehow more dangerous than before? Obviously not, and that means it isn't a "public safety issue" but instead "it makes the job harder for police in some extremely rare cases." I doubt that is justification enough for banning the practice if we view it objectively and don't allow rhetorical arguments to seep into the debate. Still, I think people should actually read the Constitution and try to understand it in context. Don't just take what other people say and assume it's true without critically engaging with what is being said.
I respect and appreciate this man for standing on his beliefs and his RIGHTS. To hear an officer say “ keep a gun on him” when he surrendered peacefully is crazy.If he was not a threat and peaceful why keep the unnecessary use of force? Hopefully he is released as soon as possible.
Hopefully TRUMP pardons this American, Patriotic Man and puts the Judge and those responsible for violating an Americans rights in the same prison he was in, but for 2x the time he’s was sentenced for, because that judge and law enforcement should know better, it’s their job to know.
Not even selling them is illegal, you just have to make sure they retain a serial number and the manufacturer has an FFL (which granted shouldn’t need one)
@AppalachianMountaineer1863 I am pretty sure self-made guns can not be sold to anyone but the government. Anyone is allowed to build guns. To sell them you have to get the ffl. But that only covers serialized guns, which a homemade gun won't have. With the ffl, though, you can apply for an expansion that allows you to build automatic firearms for R&D. In that case, you can submit your guns for government contracts bids. That is my understanding, anyway. Still seems my right to bear arms is pretty infringed. And all my tax money is used for corruption
If this man has a clean record, never caused trouble. He has every right to own and build a firearm. Look at the weapons that being sent to Ukraine. A lot of those weapons are being ending up in bad people’s hands. Does that mean the federal government should be investigated for doing that ?
This guy is spending 10 years in jail in NY for something that is a fundamental right in Florida.
But Not for everyone.
Nyc is not Florida
It will be overturned and he’s gonna get a fat check for this civil rights violation.
Youre right thats why its a problem , youre allowed to have em in all 50 states regardless of what anyones says , not just florida
@@AlphaBetSoup-69nope, supreme court already ruled localities are allowed their own gun regulations and he violated it, he's staying in prison
BUT THE ATF CAN OPENLY SMUGGLE GUNS AND DRUGS TO COUNTRIES
Remember Obama's "fast and furious" program, where to this day no one was held accountable.
Exactly
In SoCal yesterday, a gun shop owner told me the DOJ has a live feed into the store and watches/listens to everything. These people fund terrorism abroad, spy on us yet Lord over us violating our rights
Operation Fast and furious. And then loose those guns.
well yea it’s a fkn government agency you guys all sound like mick dodges and think you can do whatever you want like this is a constitutional right wen it’s not you can’t own or manufacture guns without serial numbers so if you really think you won’t get in trouble try it and see if you don’t get a gun charge if the cops find it
The judge said the second amendment doesn't exist in her courtroom... She needs to be disbarred.
Did you notice how the reporter left that out of his story?
EXACTLY
What "well-regulated militia" do you belong to?
@@douglemay7989 what cult do you belong too? If you don't follow the constitution as a judge... They're clearly in violation of the oath they laid their hand on a Bible and swore an oath to uphold the constitution and the bill of rights... Check and mate soy boy... What she said and did is completely illegal...
@@MarkTheTreeManVannthis wasn’t a violation of anything. Then everyone can walk around with a ghost gun. Gimme a damn break. People are so full is crap. All of these shootings and for what for a 1700 amendment? The British aren’t coming RELAX!
This man wasn’t selling the guns…go get real criminals !!
I smell a federal lawsuit coming. Judge says the 2nd Amendment doesn't exist in her courtroom. Suuuuure, it doesn't. Hope you lose your license.
It's a crime he's locked up
@@DonD-rb1mr Shut up bot
There is no requirement to have a law degree to run for office as a judge; it's an elected position like any other. The only lifetime appointments are to the state and federal Supreme Courts.
Today it's him tomorrow it's you
Judge made herself a target for some nice vigilante.
This isn't just his fight man, it's all of our fight that he is fighting.
Amen.
💡
Yes
Amen to that brother 🙏🇺🇸🔫💪
@richardminnis8013 damn right, the rest of us have been far too complacent regarding our inalienable rights...critical mass is coming.
Actually assembling guns at your house isnt illegal. This is a huge violation of his civil rights. This is a multi million dollar civil rights lawsuit.
Had nothing to do with assembling them. He was arrested because he was he was building ghost guns that were also assault weapons.
Edit: I love how you uneducated morons keep repeating the same "NO SUCH THING AS AN ASSAULT WEAPON" bs and then when I prove you wrong you stop replying. This is why no one takes the 2A community seriously.
@cheeko_914 define assault weapon and ghost gun for me?
@@cheeko_914Are you accusing him of possessing military rifles or did you mean something else?
To clarify: Many politicians and reporters use the term "Assault weapon" for sensationalism, but it is a term without meaning. They apply it to what are functionally the same as hanguns, but with long barrels.
This is because they don't want to lie and use a specific term like "Assault rifle", which is an automatic rifle used by the US Army. Those are already illegal to possess without a license and have a legal definition.
I ask for clarification because many people have confusion over the meaning due to propganda and I assume you mistyped.
@@Gabonro I am accusing him of clearly breaking the law by possessing assault weapons, as defined by NY state law where this took place.
@@KingOdie520 its not that hard to take 10 minutes to google the ny state laws, you should try it...
Ghost gun:
Penal Law § 265.00(32) specifies that: “ ‘Ghost gun’ means a firearm, rifle
or shotgun that does not comply with the provisions of section 265.07 of this article
and is not serialized.”
Penal Law § 265.00(8-a) defines “serialized” as follows: "Serialized"
means bearing a visible identification number and/or symbol in accordance with
the requirements imposed on licensed importers and licensed manufacturers
pursuant to subsection (i) of Section 923 of Title 18 of the United States Code and
regulations issued pursuant thereto in effect at the time of assembly. . . .”
Penal Law § 265.07 provides, in relevant part, that “[o]n or before the
effective date of this section, and promptly upon taking possession thereof at any
time thereafter, any person licensed as a gunsmith, or required to be, or a dealer
in firearms pursuant to section 400.00 of this chapter, who is in possession of an
unserialized firearm, rifle, shotgun, finished frame or receiver, or unfinished frame
or receiver shall: (a) engrave, cast, stamp or otherwise conspicuously place both
a unique serial number and his or her name (or recognized abbreviation) on such
firearm, rifle, shotgun, finished frame or receiver, or unfinished frame or receiver,
in a manner that satisfies or exceeds the requirements imposed on licensed
importers and manufacturers pursuant to section (i) of Section 923 of Title 18 of
the United States Code and regulations issued pursuant thereto at the time of such
assembly.”
Assault weapon:
The SAFE ACT bans most semi-automatic rifles by making it a felony to possess a semi-automatic rifle with a detachable magazine that has one or more cosmetic features that New York finds undesirable, such as:
A folding or adjustable stock
A thumbhole stock
A pistol grip
A bayonet lug
A foregrip
A flash suppressor
A muzzle brake
A threaded barrel, or
A grenade launcher
In addition, semi-automatic handguns are considered assault weapons if they have any one of the following features:
A manufactured weight over 50 ounces unloaded
A folding or adjustable stock
A thumbhole stock
A foregrip or second pistol grip
A magazine that attaches outside of the pistol grip
A barrel shroud, or
A threaded barrel
Shotguns are considered assault weapons if they are semi-automatic and have any one of the following features:
A folding or adjustable stock
A thumbhole stock
A foregrip or second pistol grip
The ability to accept a detachable magazine, or
A fixed magazine with a capacity over 7 rounds.
Those who owned these “Assault Weapons” before the SAFE Act were required to register them.
This government is violating this man’s rights
Free that man ! He’s within his constitutional rights.
I agree with you, but tell that to the woman who recently got an abortion in a banned state. I’m not trying to be contrarian but look around brother✌️
That wont free him
A because he is ⚫️
B because they want to set an example
@@Yourmission9I agree with your cause, but abortion isn't in the constitution.
Exactly! I agree 💯
Guns only need serial numbers and the name of the city it was made in if you plan to sell them. Homemade guns for self use don't require them.
the democrats of ny don't care about laws. They know the serial law and they overwrite laws even if it's unconstitutional. It's all about ideology
Which states
@@anthonyhenderson892 All of them. It's a federal law.
@@anthonyhenderson892 2nd amendment. Right to bear arms. Didn't say the arms has to come from a mom and pops store
@@limbeboy7 I’m in California. State laws allowed home made guns in the past without registered serial numbers. People preferred state laws for marijuana and federal laws for guns. It’s just what’s more convenient.
Its not illegal. Every American has the right to manufacturer or construte their own firearm.
Where is that in the Constitution 😅😅😅😅
@@Discovery.2100second amendment. And that right shall not be infringed. The judge said the second amendment doesn't exist in her courtroom, so even the judge agree the Constitution says it she just doesn't like it
you have worms in your brain honestly.
@agoodnight1050 the second amendment was about a well regulated militia some dude building guns in a apartment is not what the founding fathers intended.
@@Discovery.2100 where in the constitution does it say your arms has to be purchased from somewhere?
#1. Building your own firearms is 100% legal. Selling them is not unless you have an FFL and serialize them.
It’s not legal in NY
@@creditbuildingdemocratic states
@@creditbuilding shut up fed no one cares lol
@@creditbuildingsybau lil bro
In a maximum security prison? They are endangering this man for no reason
THIS!
A violation of a bureaucratic gun regulation is considered a "violent felony" in NY. Laughable.
@@grifhunter major BS!
they just jealous what he has.
The cops come quick when it's against you. If you actually need them they are no where to be found
100% agree!!!
This was planned warrant search not a response to a 911 call. You seem to think that the tac unit got a call seconds before they showed up.
Always remember they are only there to harass and collect from
The law abiding citizens .
They never patrio areas that are known to have high crime , they like their job to be easy . For every good cop that upholds his oath their outnumbered 100-1 by guys with chips on the shoulder who break their oath on a daily basis .
Yet they release dudes strait up caught with stolen guns and switches
All of them in the body cam are Jackboot oath braking thugs... they told him he has a right to remain silent, what about his right to keep and bear arms?
Free that man he’s not a criminal
The state trolling through lawfully purchased sales information should be illegal.
Very illegal. This all has to stop.
This dude is fighting for everyone.
He even broke federal law. Not just state laws.
@@donwyoming1936 legit question: what federal law?
@@donwyoming1936no he didn’t.
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
@donwyoming1936 even if so this case could very well reach SCOTUS who would rightly strike this down and establish a clear presedent that im sure would drive you nuts 😂
His rights were violated fer sure.
The constitution does NOT say That your firearm must contain a serial Number!!!!! We the people have the right To bear Arms PERIOD no matter who makes it!!
dude unless every cittzen is armed these are dangerous they can leave cases unresolved and take time and money out of our police budgets
Facts this has to get a netflix special
I agree 💯
Sick part is he didnt even use them for anything nor did he show intent to. 10 years. Thats absurd.
This the guy who’s judge said “I’m not trying to hear about the 2nd amendment?” She should be disbarred
That's the judge
State's rights. They declared these guns illegal. Not all guns. These.
No white boy....no
@@donwyoming1936they aren’t illegal though
And deported. She isn't even from here.
The search warrant itself was illegal. To establish probable cause the judge would have needed more than reasonable suspicion. If the purchasing of weapon parts itself is not a crime how can it be proof of a crime? Anything found in the search is inadmissible.
Maybe this is on purpose. They know it will get thrown out or they have the option of throwing it out after ruining his life and using up his money while at the same time trying to intimidate anyone else from building “ghost guns”.
@@shareefk9039the state of New York spends a lot of time attempting to intimidate its citizens....
100%. Unless he sold one to an undercover agent or was posting about it online with his name/face associated with the postings (highly unlikely) there isn't probable cause here at all. There are tons of people who buy gun parts and P80 lowers etc. Hundreds of thousands if not in the low-millions
Spot on
New York is the kangaroo court state we should already know that after seeing what their trying to do to trump.
`”Ghost guns” isn’t a real term. For almost 200 years building your own firearm was more common than not. I believe it was 1968 when the government said it MUST be serialized, which is in itself un Constitutional.
It also showed a slight increase in violent crimes, showing to economists that the measure made no impact
The serial number is only required if you intend to sell the firearm. Still an illegal infringement, but you can legally make unserialized guns all day.
ONLY manufacturers who sell firearms are required to put serial numbers on them….period! And that law came to be in 1968…..
@@cowboyx9380 And that was for chasing defects in manufacturing, not for tracing.
@cowboyx9380 then why does NY have laws that contradict that? You don't know what you're talking about, stop spreading misinformation.
There is no such thing as a ghost gun.
Every officer that was a part of this operation is an oath breaker
They are all Insurrectionists.
There are thousands more brother
Every officer in the country is an oath breaker. I don't like it, but it is a fact.
@ctuesburgable because we have the second amendment law enforcement shouldn't even legally lawfully exist they are contrary to the constitution and freedom and liberty.
@ctuesburgable Congress wasn't created to criminalize and enslave everything we have and do.
Right to bare arms shall not be infringed upon.
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" Regulated is in there, why do you always leave that part out? And that language refers to a nation not personal.
@@ts109 "the right of the people to keep and bare arms" do you think the militias are government owned? They're privately owned and si are their guns even in the revolutionary war alot of people were just farmers with hunting rifles
@@ts109 In 1776, the term "well-regulated" meant that a militia was well-organized, well-armed, and well-disciplined, and was able to fight effectively not regulated in a sense of how we think today by a government body i.e federal or state
@@ts109regulated means trained. Ever heard of a “Regular”
You think regulated means restricted. It doesn’t mean that.
@@ts109America does not have a militia anymore they got the army now. but you just cannot ban 300million guns
It is not illegal to build your own, it has been a right since the founding of america
Nyc says different.
@avlawns3037 which is the problem because the constitution applies to all states so having a state thinking they can supercede the constitution with state laws is comical at best. NYC is but a state nothing more.
@catwithoutthehat you have a right to use guns, but must follow any state law around it. It was police not ATF. His defense has no teeth
@@lostsoul029 marbury vs madison
@@lostsoul029 Shall not be infringed.
Free this man immediately.
He had all those guns and never caused a problem? Give him his sht back
He wanted to develop guns for the government, he got thrown in jail. Let that sink in
@@UniShuoi-e6z You can't break your own state laws. Ghost guns are legal here in Arizona, as we have no registration for guns.
@@Mark-qv4bnno federal law can be ignored brother we have a second amendment right
You know 100% he was flipping 💰💰them and had a store. Yall will believe anything 🙄
@@tyrekedadon7910No law against doing that either
Your constitutional law professor needs to update herself. There is no more public safety balancing of the law since the Bruen decision. Hope this guy winds up on top.
Exactly. The constitution doesn't need to be balanced or regulated. People have the RIGHT to bear arms, PERIOD. end of story!
@@joshuarivera428 Someone isn't old enough to remember the ban on certain assault style firearms.
I was going to make that comment- how is she a law professor?? There are laws at different levels, but the Constitution holds supremacy. You don't pass a law via the legislative branch and then break it "for balance" in the executive/ enforcement or judicial. She basically admitted that she does not know what a law is.
@mikeb5664 funny how the 94AWB didn't last and also didn't make any difference
@@mikeb5664 Assault is an act of physical violence. Inanimate objects cannot commit the crime of assault. If I used a sheet to strangle a person would the sheet become an assault style sheet?
Its perfectly clear. What he did was completely legal. No such laws can be made to prevent or supercede the bill of rights and construction. The state of NY has done just that and not by just a little. Its man that sacrifices like him helps pave the way to correcting a big injustice for all. God bless and be safe!❤
So why can't felons own firearms of any kind
@goldenglowmaster8510 You can't have a weapon if you are on parole. It's a bit tricky, really, but it is possible for an ex fellon, but many factors play into it. For example, many non-violent felonies allow for ways people to once again be allowed to carry a weapon. Did you know you're not allowed to vote either, I think that one is so stupid. After some time period you can file a motion leaking to exspung the crime, it normally requires a fairy large chuck of cash, if different per sate and also by how serious your crimes were, on average I hear it's around $2000, you sent it in with paperwork, and I think it's part judge and possibly theirs who look it over, see what your total crimes are and if not that many or that bad, then you get paperwork restoringvyou rights to have firearms again. There is a smaller simmer process to be allowed to vote again as well. Of course, the fee I don't believe is anywhere as high as the firearm. I found this out yearsxago, my best friend brother got into trouble, and then this in a nut she'll all I was told. I were actual gone and researched it real well, so feel free to if you want to know everything.
@@donaldmarwitz2046 I was making a statement that stripping felons of the 2nd ammendment somehow negates their constitutional right to bear arms.
@goldenglowmaster8510 Ahh , see where you were going a bit more.
@@goldenglowmaster8510 its an interesting question to which i rebuttal why can any other of a criminals rights be depraved once convicted (put in jail for instance). The main point there is convicted. another point i want to make is that unlike any other country (to my knowledge) the US constitution does not give us the right to have firearms it forbids the government from infringing on our right to do so, thus implying that the right is "inalienable" (as is also explicitly stated). this seams to be a common misconception. (i am not a lawyer this is not advice and i know nothing )
He needs to be released, this is our constitutional right!! That judge needs to be in federal prison!
Executed*
@blue_applesauce9990 Executed for exercising his God given constitutional rights? That's a very "extremist" view.
Everything is illegal in New York. This man is innocent, release him.
except illegal immigration
Marijuana is legal😂😂😂
😅😅😅😅😅 Lol
You should get 10 years mandatory minimum for ghost guns and similar penalties for gun trafficking. Also if your caught with a stolen gun 10 years go buy your gun through the legal channels.
He's not a Democrat voter unlike the illegal migrants, so he must stay in prison.
Shall not be infringed!!!!!!!!!!
He should've moved to upstate where is mostly within sheriff jurisdiction he could be much safer.
He's fighting a battle for all of us. May justice amd the right to bare arms, prevail. Thank you for your sacrifice🙏🏾
Do you need a tank and a B-52 bomber to go along with your gun? Will that make you feel safe?
@@marcelcharette265typical liberal, braindead response trying to incite nonsensical arguments.
@@EverythingHoops7705 How far do we need to go for people like yourself to feel safe? Are you that afraid to offer your opinion, without a gun to back you?
@@marcelcharette265as a progressive that is a member of the socialist rifle association, yes you should be able to own those.
@@marcelcharette265 it's not about if I feel safe , you can legally own a tank and bomber but the bomber will need to be registered to fly in US Airspace
A big firm could knock this case out of the park, especially if they went to the supreme court
He did have every right to have them. His rights are being violated.
Guess again. State's have rights as well.
The people are the state his constitutional rights are clearly being violated😢@@donwyoming1936
@@donwyoming1936 states don’t get to override constitutional rights
Yall are sick and don't give af about nobody fr! Where you think them guns gonna end up if anyone could make em ? A high school mass shooting maybe ? In the streets ? How bout we start giving af about people instead of trying to sound n b cool all the time
@@donwyoming1936 10th Amendment - Reserved Powers
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
The 2nd, 4th, 9th & 14th Amendments are clear, the Federal, State or Local government can Not make laws the violate those rights nor any other in the Bill of Rights.
Release this man
Same goverment that traded the "Merchant of Death💀💣👹" for a Amateur basket ball player ⛹️♀️🏀
facts
Amateur? She has multiple gold medals, plays pro ball, and is the only woman I've ever seen dunk in a game.
@Metamorphosis-hb8mr are you that oblivious? That's a man, baby! You didn't know " they" are trans??? 😂😂😂
Regardless. Don’t cling to words. A basketball player exchanged for one the world’s largest arms supplier, that sold weapons used against American troops. Marines were left to rot, but this dumb@$$ who clearly knew its illegal in Russia thought she’d walk? She was being held in Russia for breaking Russian law. I smoke too, but I respect the law of any land I travel too… and have enough discipline not to smoke for a few days.
@@Metamorphosis-hb8mr bro non of that makes it ANY better… the dude was named the merchant of death for gosh sake … vrs a girl who dunks a ball…
So the guy is smart, an engineer and loves to build firearms. Whats the crime?
Possession of firearms without the permission of his rulers, which needless to say, shouldn't be a crime, and is only something you'd see in a place like NYC or cali. Remember what those states vote for.
Living in NYC
The law can be bullies
Its tyrannical at this point
You should look up Slushy Gate, David Mascarella, Zachary Wester, Houston Tipping, Tyre Nichols, and Cariol Horne
@@UniShuoi-e6zyep flip it as you want
They usually are
F ,, the LAW
Biggest mistake he made was living in New York. I hope when he gets out, he moves out of state.
yeah, he needs to live in a republican state where they get turned on by school shootings
Then when he moves to another state he'll be telling people "Im from New York, I'm from Nww York " a thousand times a day.
Sure once he completes his 20 years 😂
So we should just any rando make gun parts at home. How does this help law and order
If you think he wasn't selling these things in the streets you're blind.
He has the right to own and posses self manufactured firearms
I'm calling bs, if I made a sawed off shotgun in my garage I would go to prison.
You sound like a good german citizen in the late 1930s 👢👅
The NFA and GCA prohibit SBRs and full auto firearms (unconstitutionally that is) and he didnt own anything that falls under those regulations. However looking at the Bill of rights under text and tradition (which is how SCOTUS makes their rulings on the 2A) it has always been legal for a person to make and own their own firearm, only recently states started passing these crooked laws
@@kuatojones6950 that is not creating a firearm, that is modifying a existing one…. At least get the basics right. And it should be perfectly legal, the difference between a 20 inch and 18 inch barrel?
@@kuatojones6950 only if you took a already made shot gun made by a manufacture turning it into a SBS but its legal for you to make a 1 inch barrel shotgun if thats what u want
@@kuatojones6950you can manufacture guns but they still have to meet certain criteria like you can build a ar15 but you can’t make it a sbr or full auto because that would make it illegal. But it’s perfectly legal to make a ar15 semi auto rifle or pistol. You can also build a shotgun but it has to meet the length requirements just like a bought one.
State law shouldn’t over power federal law.. it’s even worse when it infringes on your constitutional rights.
Atf says he broke no federal law
We know because you see no ATF officers.
Yes he has. Republicans are domestic terrorist.
@@bokc_nonpopularsalt1011 And because he faces no federal charges
@@EmmanuelTheodorebecause he broke no federal laws.
@@boldpredictionssports Bill of rights TRUMPS ALL STATE LAWS. The states still have to follow the Constitution of the United States and the bill of rights. They can make laws within their state and rule themselves so long as they follow the rules laid out for them in the bill of rights. The bill of rights doesn't give anyone rights, it protects their natural god given ones from government infringement, keep that in mind. Our government, state and federal, is breaking the rules we told them to follow, that is TYRANY.
The bill of rights can NOT be superseded, you either modify or remove it. Those are the two options.
It can’t be modified either
It can be, hence why its called an ammendment. However all gun control is illegal at this point in time under the plain text of the 2A. So are knife laws and any other weapon laws.
People often say "if you have an issues with it talk to your legislaters" "go through the proper channels" "its common sense"
Meanwhile the gov have erroded the framework of the government and passed illegal laws. That violate the Bill of rights. Permit to protest or peacefully assemble 1A. permits to carry 2A, I cannot think of any 3A violations. The NSA spying on americans without a warrent 4A, police using dirty tactics to make illegal arrests and convictions 5A. Making people wait for months or years in jail for their trial to end 6A. I cannot think of any 7A violations. Throwing the book at whistleblowes like Edward snowden for uncovering illegal acts that the feds have done 8A. The SCOTUS ignoring the 9A (they have never made a ruling based only on the 9A) and only using it as a supporting ammendent in conjuction with other Enumerated rights. Finally the 10A has been violated as any power that has not been given to the Federal gov is reserved to the states or people, yet the Feds keep taking more and more power (they take this power in the shadows through 3 letter federal agencies)
Two SCOTUS cases will decide this. One just heard deals with whether ATF can regulate and require registration in states requiring registration. The discussion compared ingredients for an omelet and a Hellofresh meal kit to individual ghost gun parts and ghost gun kits. The second that applies is the Heller ruling. SCOTUS affirmed the right to keep a firearm in a residence, BUT 2A was NOT unlimited.
10th amendment.
@@jewmanchoolee466 We have a tyrannical government's in every state as well as at the federal level. I know it's from a movie but Mel Gibson did say "An elected legislature can trample a man's rights as easily as a king can". Tyranny doesn't just take one form, it takes all forms.
This man's imprisonment is disgusting, and the prosecutor and judge are an utter disgrace for how they handled this. Not an intentional criminal, no ill will, no victim, no likely future victim, and an extremely sketchy statue behind it. Even if they felt obliged to publicly enforce the new law, picking this defendant and leveling a die in jail sentence is too much. Just disgusting people who warrant no respect
He needs to be released, this is our constitutional right!!
Definitely violating his rights, it’s your 2nd amendment right to build your own. People have been doing it for centuries. It’s when you sell them question can arise.
You should be able to sell them to anyone too!
This is going to turn into a movie
And he’s the villain
Except they are going to make him white and he’s the hero.
Facts
@@blahblahblah-fo6xnand you're the bot...
Assembling guns is not illegal and any law against it is unconstitutional
No, but possessing them IS illegal. And he’s smart enough to know this. He’s GUILTY.
You may as well just tell people to etch off the serial numbers of their guns since it's their own property lol I swear the people that actually care about gun rights aren't smart enough to do anything about it.
@@kuatojones6950 these is zero reason to have serial numbers on guns
@@62Cristoforo how can it be illegal? Don’t you know what the second amendment is?
@@kuatojones6950you make mo sense but okay bud
This guy should be free
“No state shall convert a liberty into a
license, and charge a fee therefore:' (Murdock v.
Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105)
"If the State converts a right (liberty) into
a privilege, the citizen can ignore the license
and fee and engage in the right (liberty) with
impunity." (Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham,
Alabama, 373 U.S. 262)
Americans moved away from educating themselves to being overly entertained. Most people could tell you everything there is about their favorite football/baseball team and player but can’t name 5 of their Constitutional rights or their amendments. Our rights are like muscles. If you don’t use them, you lose them.
If the average person knew what I knew about how far the government has veered from the Constitution and what it’s actually done and still is doing, there’d probably be a revolution overnight
You perfectly described the trump supporters who conveniently ignore the fact that he literally said he would terminate parts of the Constitution, to stay in power after he lost in 2020
@@Tortilla.ReformHe never said that, and the Constitution gives the Vice President every right to decline to certify the results of the election.
@@Tortilla.Reform you sound like a robot reading a script😑
@@GrantDWilliams82 He literally said that, why are you being dishonest with the classic maga “fake news” excuse. It’s a fact, you can easily look it up instead of being dismissive because you worship trump. And if you’re correct, why didn’t Pence follow trumps fake electors scheme?
Try Heller. The court affirmed the right to have a firearm in a residence it also said 2A is not unlimited, allowing for regulation. The recently heard Vanderstok case challenges specifically regulation of ghost guns, parts and kits. The court compared ingredients for an omelet and a Hellofresh meal kit to individual ghost gun parts and ghost gun kits.
He's fighting for the rights of every other gun owner!
He broke state law, and will lose.
@@mikeb5664if his case ever makes it to the Supreme Court he most likely will win on the grounds that historically there were no laws in place prohibiting someone from making their own firearms. Per SCOTUS (Bruen) government can no longer make public interest arguments in defense of state laws. Once the second amendment is implicated only history and tradition matters.
@@mikeb5664you are going to feel immensely stupid when this all hashes out...
Free Him
of course he has the right to own everything and anything he wants this is a FREE country!!
Acquit. Nothing wrong with owning firearms.
keep telling yourself that
Maximum security prison for not harming anyone? Maybe not even firing them? what..
Why do it in NY lmaooo
I'm sorry that the constitutional professor is totally incorrect. In the cases of Heller as well as the case of bruin supreme Court made it a fundamental right to keep and bear arms at your place of residence the brewing case made it a fundamental right to bear arms outside of the home. But New York City and New York state law does not overshadow federal law for the supreme Court's ruling makes ownership of a firearm a fundamental right. This is going to be an interesting case in federal court. This may be the new catalyst for constitutional carry
I think its more to with the fact that they're Ghost guns. do you think you know more than a Law Professor? 😂😂😂
@@reecetheconstitution says nothing about ghost guns, says your right to bear arms shall not be infringed. Professors can be wrong to, law is up to interpretation
@@reecetheNo, it has more to do with your DA trying to prove a point.... The blue States are indeed taking our guns...
@@reecethe yes I do..... Self manufactured firearms have been around since before the revolution. The moniker ghost guns what's the term coined by the stupid media. In an effort to sensationalize self manufactured firearms. There is no variable that can be applied to factual law. The supreme Court the highest court of the land made it a fundamental right in its ruling on the 2nd Amendment. The left-wing ideology always wants to find some rhyme or reason to whittle out an unconstitutional restriction against law-abiding citizens.
The recently heard Vanderstok case is about ghost gun regulation. The discussion compared ingredients for an omelet and a Hellofresh meal kit to individual ghost gun parts and ghost gun kits.
His constitutional rights are being violated. Building your own firearms is part of the right to bear arms. A homemade firearm is a bearable arm.
#FreeDexterTaylor
💯💯‼️
😂, free your scalp from weave. 💯
Right to bear arms. Cannot be infringed by any state.
Yep
14th amendment section 1 Text.
No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the united states
That lady said the bill has limits not true
That confusing part that says “Shall NOT be infringed” may have tripped her up.
@@icelandviking1961leftists do every time...
She's a socialist POS which is why we have the 2nd Amendment.
It's the same thing with marijuana. If they can't tax it, you can't grow it. Just like firearms. They can't tax if you make your own firearms.. this world is always about greed
If he wasn't selling them, then let him go.
Ghost guns are illegal. No registration. He resides in the state. He will lose and will get prison time as he should.
@@dan-sc7fm*Truth That."*
Why cuz hes black
Bro, you can get a nuke, right? that is a weapon. You should try to get one.
@@dan-sc7fm thanks for telling us you're a homosexual nice to know
she deliberately left out the 'shall not be infringed' part and mentioned interest balancing instead, interest balancing is already ruled on as inapplicable by the supreme court
said " 'shall not be infringed' "
Does a violent mentally ill person that has been involuntary committed to a mental institution have the inalienable right to possess arms? What about someone that is on a 72 hour hold? Either Shall Not is absolute or ,under certain circumstances, it can be infringed on. Pick a side, what can be more simple than a Yes or NO?
first off, you presented a false dichotomy, in each of those examples you gave the individuals are in custody or not in control of themselves and thus become a ward of the court.
there is no way to rule over free men until they run afoul of the law...do you know the rest? hint, atlas shrugged.
@@1CoupedeTat But 2A SPECIFICALLY states " Shall not be infringed " this means under no circumstances and this statement overrides ALL other regulations. Do any other amendments state " shall not be infringed"?
You and i are in agreement but there is other preceeding text that establishes a proper context for what i stated
@@bobroberts2371If you’re too dangerous to own/possess firearms, you should be locked away from society. If you are a free person, you are allowed to exercise your unalienable right to keep and bear arms - end of story. Your rights are not granted to you by the Constitution or by government; you are born with these rights, which are enumerated in The Constitution.
This is disgusting. The officers who raided that man's house should be ashamed of themselves. They are just as bad as the lawmakers who sent them.
People are being trafficked every single day, but this is what they wanna focus on what you’re doing in your home! Clean that swamp!!
J Edgar Hoover went after small town bank robbers as the Mafia was puppeteering senators.
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" Memorize it. It doesnt give you the right to own a gun it takes away the Governments right to take them away from you.
you left out a few lines but ok 😂
This is sooooooo sad he should not be in prison this man should be free!!!!
The right of the people to keep and bare arms shall not be infringed.
The judge needs to be thrown in jail.
We all know why he's in jail! 💔🇺🇲
✊🏿🇺🇸 They don't respect the 2nd amendment or the 4th amendment. Why would we assume they respect the 13th?
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!!!
This is awful
Human rights are unalienable
If we had this kind of gov. 250 years ago we would never have won The Revolutionary War.
That's the point
1812 treaty of Ghent, look it up
This is the type of government we had 250 years ago. Then the people rose up and ended the tyranny.
@@politicsuncensored5617 but we don’t live in that time now do we? Those laws were for a different time and space. It’s 2024…we don’t need to defend our land against the British. We have the military land air and sea. Murders by guns are on the rise. Only in AMERICA do we have to worry about people shooting up a place like elementary schools colleges high schools concerts clubs movies postal office. People with legally owned guns people with ghost guns, mental health issues, no mental health issues that snapped out of no where….murdering innocent people with guns! He isn’t a cop, he isn’t in the military…what if he decided to snap after something life changing happens? What will someone say then?
@@Yarnover_PullThrough Not the British, but our own federal is the danger today.
Where is the NRA
He’s Black
NRA is a scam
They did the same thing to the NRA they did to Trump, Forbidden to do business in New York
It means Not Really for Africans.
Call them and stop pretending you are just a casual observer to this story. You think you can't become a part of it yourself. People in the NRA aren't omnipresent especially when it comes to matters in New York City - a place that hates them where they have little presence.
If you like firearms, DONT live in NYC. In VA it’s completely legal to manufacture your own weapon unless you intent to sell it
NY is it's own country.
Worst place ever
Every state is literally a country. Each unique
More like a degenerate cesspool.
No, NY is a Red State with a gangrenous foot, that has spread to a few spots further up the body.
@@johnli25
Some uniquely awful and should be relegated to the bottom of the Atlantic
This is injustice to the extreme! I’ve never called for anyone to be freed than this individual, my brother in arms!
I hope president Trump pardons this guy
He won’t get pardoned by trump because he is black. Let’s see.
You mean the guy who instituted the bump stock ban turning hundreds of thousands of Americans into felons overnight for owning a piece of plastic? Trump is anything but pro-freedom.
Unfortunately that would do Dexter no good, because the president can only pardon people for federal crimes. Dexter was convicted under New York State law and thus can only be pardoned by the governor of New York.
@@armadillolover99 That is deeply frustrating, and seems like it was designed to be a work-around.
Me to
Free that man. His right are being infringed on.
He's in the wrong state for that
Damn hope he gets home soon 🙏🏾❤️
Hes right. Our rights are higher then any law put in place to hinder them.
Bro in the wrong state
He's that intelligent you was welcomed in Texas brother
Imagine if a judge said " The 14th Amendment doesn't exist in this court." Would you be so willing to give up someones rights then?
Agreed...or the 1st...it's CRAZY.
He’s going to prison for exercising his constitutional rights! Free him!
Absolutely disgusting how they treated him in that search.
Both parties were respectful and dignified. Try again
@@blahblahblah-fo6xn why don’t you explain how they were respectful and dignified? They arrested an innocent man.
yet they do nothing about all the illegals robbing people and all the people with glock switches which are illegal.. but this dude is the issue
@@sheldoneuos He stated in the interview that the police were respectful during the search. When they have a warrant they don't knock.
Shall not be infringed? So any gun control law is infringement that’s it
"The right to bear arms shall not be infringed" that means no limits
“Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited. [It is] not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.” -- Justice Scalia in writing for the majority in the Heller case.
soooo...nuclear weapons? IED's? What is YOUR interpretation of the 2nd?
@@Callsign_Sturm People often forget that it's all interpretations, and they often fail to include the entire text of the Second Amendment. The actual Second Amendment clearly mentions militias, but the U.S. Supreme Court in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) interpreted that the right to bear arms is an individual right, not contingent on service in a militia. So, is the "random appointed person" interpreting that it isn’t contingent on militia service correct, but somehow the interpretation that it is not unlimited is wrong? Is that your interpretation? Is your interpretation somehow more correct than the U.S. Supreme Court’s interpretation, and if so, please explain how it is.
To be clear, I personally don't see anything wrong with what he was doing. If it was illegal, then there is something wrong with the law. They cite "increased risk to police" often as a reason for making what he was doing illegal, but that is simply a rhetorical argument. The risk of injury from a weapon with serial numbers is no less than one without. If someone files off the serial numbers, does that logically imply that the weapon is somehow more dangerous than before? Obviously not, and that means it isn't a "public safety issue" but instead "it makes the job harder for police in some extremely rare cases." I doubt that is justification enough for banning the practice if we view it objectively and don't allow rhetorical arguments to seep into the debate.
Still, I think people should actually read the Constitution and try to understand it in context. Don't just take what other people say and assume it's true without critically engaging with what is being said.
@nomenclature9373 "The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." That is pretty clear. I don't see anything about limits in that statement.
I respect and appreciate this man for standing on his beliefs and his RIGHTS. To hear an officer say “ keep a gun on him” when he surrendered peacefully is crazy.If he was not a threat and peaceful why keep the unnecessary use of force? Hopefully he is released as soon as possible.
The police have no HONOR.
Sadly enough we apparently only abide by the constitution when the government says its fit to lol. I commend this man for standing up for 2A rights.
Hopefully TRUMP pardons this American, Patriotic Man and puts the Judge and those responsible for violating an Americans rights in the same prison he was in, but for 2x the time he’s was sentenced for, because that judge and law enforcement should know better, it’s their job to know.
Building your own guns has never been illegal in the United States. Selling them is.
Selling them shouldn’t be illegal either
Not even selling them is illegal, you just have to make sure they retain a serial number and the manufacturer has an FFL (which granted shouldn’t need one)
@@AppalachianMountaineer1863 I should be able to make and sell guns without a serial number.
@AppalachianMountaineer1863 I am pretty sure self-made guns can not be sold to anyone but the government. Anyone is allowed to build guns. To sell them you have to get the ffl. But that only covers serialized guns, which a homemade gun won't have. With the ffl, though, you can apply for an expansion that allows you to build automatic firearms for R&D. In that case, you can submit your guns for government contracts bids. That is my understanding, anyway. Still seems my right to bear arms is pretty infringed. And all my tax money is used for corruption
The man is totally right...but when the law is lawless,....well here you see what happens.
keep crying LOL
At least they didn't shoot his dog and kid. Yall sure do forget so easy. At least it wasn't you so oh well, back to your phones
Shall NOT be infringed. What is unclear about that?
Calm down, you can still do it
It was never meant for blacks, they use guns crimes or sell them to criminals, not for self defense.
Free this man.
If this man has a clean record, never caused trouble. He has every right to own and build a firearm. Look at the weapons that being sent to Ukraine. A lot of those weapons are being ending up in bad people’s hands. Does that mean the federal government should be investigated for doing that ?