Assalam aleykoum. Djazakumullah khayr, may Allah bless your efforts and give you tawfiq. From where are you doing these lectures Mashallah. Salam from Mauritania
@@MasjidRibat ماشاء الله تبارك الله. I've discovered your channel yesterday night and since then I'm benefiting from them. Salam to all our brothers in California
Assalamualaikum brother We people of hadith : dont say or act without proof So, If ur truthful in ur statement then prove it if ur truthful If not then hold/restrain ur Tongue and actions
our stance in light of Sahih Hadith: 1. Sahih Muslim (2604a) - Disrespected Prophet (saww) - Ignored calls from Prophet (saww) only to finish his food 2. Sahih Bukhari (2812) - War with Ali (as) - Battle of Siffin and killing thousands of Companions 3. Sahih Muslim (6229) - Cursing of Ali (as) - Ultimately ended by Umar bin Abdul Aziz (ra) 4. Sahih Bukhari (2704) - War with Hassan (as) - Refused to accept Hassan (as) as caliph and killed muslims 5. Sahih Bukhari (4108) - Taunted son of Umar (ra) - Said he's more worthy of caliphate than Umar (ra) 6. Sahih Muslim (4776) - UnIslamic orders - Told people to kill one another and loot wealth 7. Abu Dawood (4131) - Corruption and greed - A Companion exposing his wrongful deeds
He has many lectures on prophit pbuh and al the sahabas imcluding abu bakar umar uthman and Ali(RA) may ALLAH be pleased with them all this lecture is about Muawiyah whats ur point ?
@@zayedharoon3910 Point was Muawiya was a rebel. Caused a huge loss of life to the ummah. Introduced bidah. Caused strife and fitna. He was not someone to be emulated. His parents fought and opposed Prophet (saw), till the swords were on their head. An oath breaker against the Sulah with Imam Hasab ibn Ali. Why present him as a role model? Do you get the point. Or you are going to harp on about how he is a Sahabi, cause he saw the prophet(saw).
@@Loljilol Muawiyyah RaziAllaahuanhu is a Test for the Ahl Us Sunnah. He was a great Sahabi and Khalifa of Islam. Read the books on Manhaj and Aqeeda of the Salafus Saleh
@@sislast He is not a test. He was not a khalifa. He was a King. All great scholars pf Islam are agreed on that. He was not great. Sahabi Sahabi sahabi! There were ashaab who were munafiq, there were ashaab who prophet said to their face .’I cannot pray for you’. Imagine rehmat ul alameen saw saying that. He caused strife and fitna. He was the leader of the party that killed ammar ibn yasser ra. He was the one who broke treaty. I can go on and on and on. So please dont include all of ahl e sunnah into this. Him, his father and his sons were open nawasibs.
Assalam aleykoum. Djazakumullah khayr, may Allah bless your efforts and give you tawfiq. From where are you doing these lectures Mashallah. Salam from Mauritania
Demba Assa Diagana وإياكم
حياكم الله وبياكم
These lectures are live streamed from Masjid ar-Ribat in San Diego California
@@MasjidRibat ماشاء الله تبارك الله.
I've discovered your channel yesterday night and since then I'm benefiting from them. Salam to all our brothers in California
Demba Assa Diagana وعليكم السلام ورحمة الله وبركاته
بارك الله فيك وبارك عليك
very informa tive video ...
جزاكم الله خيراً .. 🤲🤲🤲
وإياكم
@@MasjidRibat you thief!you are slaves of the rulers
Shaikh, please do durus on some of the Uthmaniya Khulafa likes Sulayman Qanuni and Abd al-Hamid II.
Can we call "moula"?
This guy was paid recently some thousand riyal. He gets paid for praising some people. Why ?
Show proof without accusing widely, which is haraam
Assalamualaikum brother
We people of hadith : dont say or act without proof So,
If ur truthful in ur statement then prove it if ur truthful
If not then hold/restrain ur Tongue and actions
@@tanveerkagadagar2379 Sure. there is lack of evidence of presence of a thing, does not always conclude to the absence of that thing totally.
@indianrational6887 : r u muslim (just asking ) not accusing u just asking because from the name of urs .
our stance in light of Sahih Hadith:
1. Sahih Muslim (2604a) - Disrespected Prophet (saww) - Ignored calls from Prophet (saww) only to finish his food
2. Sahih Bukhari (2812) - War with Ali (as) - Battle of Siffin and killing thousands of Companions
3. Sahih Muslim (6229) - Cursing of Ali (as) - Ultimately ended by Umar bin Abdul Aziz (ra)
4. Sahih Bukhari (2704) - War with Hassan (as) - Refused to accept Hassan (as) as caliph and killed muslims
5. Sahih Bukhari (4108) - Taunted son of Umar (ra) - Said he's more worthy of caliphate than Umar (ra)
6. Sahih Muslim (4776) - UnIslamic orders - Told people to kill one another and loot wealth
7. Abu Dawood (4131) - Corruption and greed - A Companion exposing his wrongful deeds
Why are you wasting your life on Muawiyah?!
He has many lectures on prophit pbuh and al the sahabas imcluding abu bakar umar uthman and Ali(RA) may ALLAH be pleased with them all this lecture is about Muawiyah whats ur point ?
@@zayedharoon3910 Point was Muawiya was a rebel. Caused a huge loss of life to the ummah. Introduced bidah. Caused strife and fitna. He was not someone to be emulated. His parents fought and opposed Prophet (saw), till the swords were on their head. An oath breaker against the Sulah with Imam Hasab ibn Ali. Why present him as a role model? Do you get the point. Or you are going to harp on about how he is a Sahabi, cause he saw the prophet(saw).
@@Loljilol Muawiyyah RaziAllaahuanhu is a Test for the Ahl Us Sunnah. He was a great Sahabi and Khalifa of Islam. Read the books on Manhaj and Aqeeda of the Salafus Saleh
@@sislast He is not a test. He was not a khalifa. He was a King. All great scholars pf Islam are agreed on that. He was not great. Sahabi Sahabi sahabi! There were ashaab who were munafiq, there were ashaab who prophet said to their face .’I cannot pray for you’. Imagine rehmat ul alameen saw saying that. He caused strife and fitna. He was the leader of the party that killed ammar ibn yasser ra. He was the one who broke treaty. I can go on and on and on. So please dont include all of ahl e sunnah into this. Him, his father and his sons were open nawasibs.
@@Loljilol hypocrites are not considered sahabi. He is explaining history but not from the rafidhi liar point of view