Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.
1 Khilafah of Yazīd : Yazīd and al-Husayn
Вставка
- Опубліковано 27 гру 2019
- 1 Khilafah of Yazīd : Yazīd and al-Husayn
Send us a message! We are happy to address any questions or concerns you may have. Please be as detailed as possible so that we may better assist you. Or you can call us at 619-741-1955
👉 If you love this video, please like and share it.
👉 Don't forget to subscribe to this channel for more update.
👉 Subscribe now: bit.ly/2vWqOaZ
💢💢 Watch our other video:
💟 Is The Bible The Word Of God?: • Is The Bible The Word ...
💟 Jummah Khutbah: What is the purpose of life?: • What is the purpose of...
💟 Fiqh of Fasting 1: • 38 Sharh Akhsar al-Muk...
💢💢 Stay with us:
💟 Facebook: / masjidribat
💟 Google Plus: plus.google.co...
💟 Personal Website: www.masjidribat...
💟 Email: info@fiqhlessons.com
#UthmanIbnFarooq #Islamicclasses #MasjidRibat
Thank you for watching this video, click the "SUBSCRIBE" button for stay connected with this channel.
Subscription Link: bit.ly/2vWqOaZ
Yazeed not only forced his Bayah upon companions, he attacked Makkah and Madinah after martyrdom of Imam Hussayn. Please shaykh don't make it look as small mistake
the prophet also attacked mekka to control it and no yazid didnt force anyone
@@m7mdxd_137 Astragfirullah Prophet didn't attack makka, and the prophet taught us to respect sahaba and yazeed was from tabeen era he was not a companion and prophet also taught us to be kind with ahle madinah, I'm not shia but yazeed was wrong
You're right Yazid didn't forced anyone but his father Muawiya did. @@m7mdxd_137
Well said
I'm a sunni and learning about this. If Yazid did all that you cannot cover this up!
Staying quite in the face of injustice is injustice.
Quiet *
That’s usul;you can’t rebel until one is disbeliever;
It’s in hadith
His general killed Hussain and didn't get punished period its very obvious then that he was pleased with his general for what he did let not us sunnis make excuses for the murderers of Hussain
He was punished by Allah swt as he was assassinated that dirty dog shimr
Well said, have to call a spade a spade, it's ridiculous. The shias praise the killer of Umar ibn il khattab which I find to be beyond disgraceful. But to praise yazid ibn Muawiyah is nearly as disgraceful
@@Breen.Machine its more disgraceful since muawiya killed dozens of sahaba.
Many ulama consider him damned
@@kataangsucks which ulama? Ever heard of Umar Ibn Abdul Aziz actually got angry when he Heard that someone insult Muawiya Ibn Abu Sufyan Radhiallahu Anhu? Ibn Taymiyyah also say that Muawiya is the best Monarch.. Stop with the blind hatred of A Companion.. my God these people could only do bandwagonning at best.. brainwashed much by the Abbasids that used to give many anti-Umayyad messages?
No he didn't kill the general because he was a tyrant so he would never be able to do these kind of justice
I had so much respect for him after this lecture I understand he has nasbi blood in him
Definately he has Naasbiyat in his blood. Or lack of knowledge.
@@aabud905brother ahle hadees are nasbi
And you know one muhammad bin abdul wahab and hia children
They were supporters of hussain.
Even you know shiekh abdul.qadir jilani wrote against ali ra and in favour of muawiyah ra
So nasbiyat is a thing which is in blood of these people
@@aabud905 but theres a hadees that sahi muslim 240
Zirr reported: 'Ali observed: By Him Who split up the seed and created something living, the Apostle (may peace and blessings be upon him) gave me a promise that no one but a believer would love me, and none but a hypocrite would nurse grudge against me.
So love for ali ibn abi talib is necessary for momin.
And ghadeer e khum
Prophet said man kuntum maula fahaza aliyun maula.
I am a convert who is came through the sunni tradition but it blows my mind how someone can claim to believe in the prophet yet kill his grandson and oppress imam zainul abideen and yet make salah and send blessings on them
Oh please if you don’t understand, don’t say anything. Who gives salah to yazid? Have you not watched the video
No one from Ahlus sunnah sends blessings to him did you even watch the video? and astagfirullah we dont make salah to him thats only for us to worship Allah. we as Ahlus sunnah do not love yazid nor curse him we stay neutral.
Staying neutral lol 😲
May Allah curse Yazeed(l.a)
@@ma1la2z54 my friends cal taxis Amir al mumineen. You’re just the majority who doesn’t care for history
But Hussain Ra is master of youth in paradise ❤
Allahumma la'an qatalata hussain bin Ali
Ameen
The best thing in this lecture is the short story of Imam Saleh and Imam Ahmed and that sums it up. No momin can love yazeed.
All this is bullshit ,
Yazid Rahimullah was Ameer Al Momin ,and brother of Sayyadna Husain Razi Allahu Anhu.
@@sheikhbhaitv9250 Yazeed forces responsible for the death of sahabah Abdullah Ibn Zubayr wtf
I heard Salah ibn Ahmad ibn Hanbal say, "I said to my father, "Indeed, there is a group of people accusing us of being in love with Yazid! So he said, 'O my son, will a believer who believes in God love Yazid?! So I said, "Why don't you curse him?" He replied, "When did you witness me cursing someone? Why is not a cursed person whom God has cursed in His Holy Book?" I said, "In which verse does God curse Yazid?" So he recited the verse:
فَهَلْ عَسَيْتُمْ إِنْ تَوَلَّيتُمْ انُ تُسِدُوا فِ الْرْضِ وَ تُقِّعُوا رَحمَكُمْ * أُولئِكَ الَّذينَ لَعَنَهُمُ اللَُّّ فَأَصَمَّهُمْ وَ اَ عْمي أَبْصارَهُمْ
"Then what if you are in power, you will cause damage on the face of the earth and break family ties * Those are the people whom God cursed and He deafened their ears and blinded their sight."
Is there more destruction than genocide?!
Qadhi Abul Hasan; Muhammad ibn Qadhi Abu Ya'la al Farrâ' wrote a book explaining who has the right to be cursed/cursed. In it he mentions Yazid as worthy of being cursed. He said, "The person who forbids cursing Yazid is sometimes an ignorant person (who does not understand) that it is allowed, or a hypocrite who intends to deceive the ignorant public. And it may be that he deceives them by saying, "A believer does not like cursing."
@@sheikhbhaitv9250Shame on you. Don't tarnish our (Sunnis) name
@@Kashmiri_Separatist shame on you ,you not Sunni You only Shia 😠
@@Kashmiri_Separatist Yazeed Rah Alai Zindabad Yazeed Rah Alai Sayyadna Husain Razi Allahu Anhu Ke Bhai Hai .
May Allah curse those who martyred Ali and Hussain Radiallao Anhum.
Yazid didn't kill Imam Hassan or Hussain
Nor did he order their killing
The same thing about al majoosi
@@aliansari3060 then why he didn't punish his governor zeeyad who killed child of prophet contrary he was promoted if yazeed was not happy with this and im not shia
@Abdur Razique shut up brother, you really are comparing Ali r.a with this example.... childish of you.
If not this, read about waqia Harrah of your beloved yazeed
@Abdur Razique Don't side with Yazeed, Justifying his actions instead of standing with Al Hussain r.a, The King is responsible for the actions of it's govt
I still don't understand how Muawiyah (ra) gets a free pass for not giving baya to Ali (ra) from every prominent Sunni. I don't understand how they give a pass to him giving the successorship to his son... no other Caliph did that. Where is it condoned that we send the successorship to our kin above having a vote like they did in the past? I follow the Sunnah btw, but this is an issue which I still don't understand. In my opinion there is a heavy bias. I personally think Ali (ra) was the rightful Caliph. Muawiya (ra) was in the wrong for not giving baya, he could've easily given the baya and then they would have dealt with the perpetrators. Seems like some hidden agenda behind the scene, hence why did he give the Caliph to his son out of all people?
It is because Muawiya lived and died on another religion than Islam. He was only interested in power, mascarading Islam outwardly because it was the only way to establish himself in the society after prophet Muhammads passing. It was his lifelong goal to make himself the enemy of Ali ibn Abi Talib. As was it his fathers goal to be enemies with the prophet Muhammad. As was it his sons goal to be enemies with Hussain ibn Ali.
The difference between a man like Muawiya and Ali ibn Abi Talib is the same as the difference between day and night. Only an insanely biased person would hold these two in competition with eachother from a religious standpoint. That is why you see even the staunchest defender of Muawiya regularly focuses on his worldly attributes. He has nothing to show for his religion. May God's curse be on him!
@@metinmetin1246 so why do alims defend him?
Good question. There are several reasons. At the core lies the motivation to sustain the sunni narrative about the companions of the prophet Muhammad. The sunni scholarship overwhelmingly, with a few exceptions, do not open any way for criticism of anybody they label "companion" of the prophet Muhammad. That includes people like Muawiya ibn Abi Sufyan or his right-hand Amr ibn al-aas or Mughira ibn Shuba and so on(and the list of such individuals could go on).
Another reason is to maintain the (historical) legitimacy of the sunni version of the caliphate. Once you openly admit that some of the "caliphs" were one of the worst criminals in islamic history, the system of caliphate is questioned itself and might break down.
Hope to have answered your question adequately.
@
Metin Metin
Ibn `Umar (May Allah be pleased with them) said: The Messenger of Allah (PBUH) said, "When a person calls his brother (in Islam) a disbeliever, one of them will certainly deserve the title. If the addressee is so as he has asserted, the disbelief of the man is confirmed, but if it is untrue, then it will revert to him.''
[Al-Bukhari and Muslim].
Be careful of what you say brother. From the way you speak you are a Shia I'm guessing? Repent to Allah for calling a Sahaba a Kuffar, and cursing him. I personally stop after the time of Ali (Ra) and don't say anything about anyone after that if they were just or not, and would never say that they were Kuffar. I agree that some Sahaba might have made mistakes, because they were not Prophets of course, and we are all sons of Adam, but to call them a kuffar is crazyyy. You want to talk about legitimacy about islamic history? The Shia ideology is a whole entire religion and ideology that the Prophet (pbuh) and the early Sahaba were never upon. It's like the Trinity to what early Christians believed (Pure Monotheism). The religious ideology of the Shia has no basis in Islam and is clear bidah. The attributes of Allah put upon the 12 Imams for example, cursing the sahaba (as you're showing), praying to those other than Allah (Ya Ali, Ya Hussein), praying to graves, are all bidah and make it a whole entire other religion. Go study the history of your beliefs before making such despicable claims. What was originally just a political divide turned into a whole new religion entirely...
Let me ask you a serious question. If you weren't born Shia, and you were born a Trinitarian Christian, Jew, or Hindu for example, 99.99% you would believe it blindly because it is what your forefathers believe, but it doesn't make it the truth. Don't blindly follow what you were born into, because you've clearly been blinded by your indoctrination of your forefathers which is based on hatred and bidah. One thing that Shia's and Trinitarians have in common is that the belief's foundation is based on emotion and not logic. They both have hard time's analyzing their beliefs objectively on history, and instead get blinded by their emotion. Alhamdulillah, I questioned my own beliefs objectively and questioned every religion objectively, which is why I can safely say I've been guided to the Haqq. I would never dare say that one of the Sahaba or the Prophet's wife is a kuffar like some of your people do. Fear Allah...
@@Barca4Life777 You do not know what or who I am and what my background is. Why cant you address the topic instead of getting personal or assuming things? If you dont want to address the topic leave it be.
The answer to your initial question also lies in my answer. If you are interested of course. If you want to be biased like any other standard sunni historian lets just stop because there is no point.
"I swear by Allah in whose hand my life is that I am a Sunni Muslim who follows Qur'an and Sunnah and Salaf and I am not a Shia, and I don't do any shirk with Allah."
Narrated Ibn Abbas(R):
I was playing with children and Allah's Messenger(ﷺ) happened to pass by (us). I hid myself behind the door. He (the Prophet) came and patted my shoulders and said: Go and call Mu'awiya(bin Abu Sufiyan). I returned and said: He is busy in eating food. He(ﷺ) again asked me to go and call Mu'awiya to him. I went (and came back) and said that he was busy in eating food, whereupon he(ﷺ) said: May Allah never fill his stomach!
---[Sahih Al-Muslim 6628]
Zirr reported:
"Ali bin Abi Talib(R) said: (I swear)By Him Who split up the seed and created something living, the Prophet (ﷺ) gave me a promise that no one but a believer would love me, and none but a hypocrite would nurse grudge against me. "
---[Sahih Al-Muslim 78]
Amir ibn Sa'd ibn Abi Waqqas reported on the authority of his father that Muawiya ibn Abi Sufyan ordered Sa'd Ibn Abi Waqqas(R) and said:
Why are you not abusing Abu Turab (i.e Ali Ibn Abi Talib(R)), whereupon he said: It is because of three things which I remember Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) having said about him that I would not abuse him and even if I find one of those three things for me, it would be more dear to me than the red camels. (1) I heard Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) say about 'Ali as he left him behind in one of his campaigns (that was Tabuk). 'Ali(R) said to him: Allah's Messenger, you leave me behind along with women and children. Thereupon Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said to him: Aren't you satisfied with being unto me what Harun was unto Musa but with this exception that there is no prophethood after me.(2) And I (also) heard him(Prophet (S)) say on the Day of Khaibar: I would certainly give this standard to a person who loves Allah and his Messenger, and Allah and his Messenger love him too. He (Sa'd) said: We had been anxiously waiting for it, when he (the Prophet(S)) said: Call 'Ali(R). He was called and his eyes were inflamed. He applied saliva to his eyes and handed over the standard to him, and Allah gave him victory. (3)(The third occasion is this) when the (following) verse was revealed: "Let us summon our children and your children." Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) called 'Ali, Fatima, Hasan and Husain and said: O Allah, they are my family.
----[Sahih Al-Muslim 2404d]
Narrated Zaid bin Arqam(R):
from the Prophet (ﷺ): For whomever I am his Mawla then 'Ali is his Mawla.
---[Sunan At-Tirmidi 3713]
Abu Yahya (Imam Tirmidhi) said this(hadith) is Hasan Saheeh Gareeb (Authentic)
Shaikh Albani classified it as Saheeh (Authentic)
--- "Here Mawla means leader"
Narrated `Ikrima: that Ibn `Abbas told him go to Abu Sa`id and listen to some of his narrations; So they both went (and saw) Abu Sa`id and his brother irrigating a garden belonging to them. When he saw them, he came up to them and sat down with his legs drawn up and wrapped in his garment and said, (During the construction of the mosque of the Prophet) we carried the adobe of the mosque, one brick at a time while `Ammar ibn Yasir(R) used to carry two at a time. The Prophet(S) passed by `Ammar and removed the dust off his head and said, May Allah be merciful to `Ammar. He will be killed by a rebellious aggressive group. `Ammar will invite them to (obey) Allah(and Paradise in other narration) and they will invite him to the (Hell) fire. ---[Sahih Al Bukhari 2812]
During the battle of Siffin Ammar ibn Yasir was one of the commanders in the army of Ali ibn Abi Talib(A) and he was killed by man from the army of Muawiyah ibn Abi Sufiyan.
Narrated `Ikrima bin Khalid:
Ibn `Umar(R) said, "I went to Hafsa(wife of Prophet (S) and sister of Ibn Umar) while water was dribbling from her twined braids. I said, 'The condition of the people is as you see, and no authority has been given to me.' Hafsa said, (to me), 'Go to them, and as they (i.e. the people) are waiting for you, and I am afraid your absence from them will produce division amongst them.' " So Hafsa(R) did not leave Ibn `Umar(R) till we went to them. When the people differed. Muawiya addressed the people saying, "'If anybody wants to say anything in this matter of the Caliphate, he should show up and not conceal himself, for we(i.e Muawiya and his son Yazeed) are more rightful to be a Caliph than he(i.e Abdullah Ibn Umar(R)) and his father((Umar ibn Al Khattab (R))." On that, Habib bin Masalama said (to Ibn `Umar), "Why don't you reply to him (i.e. Muawiya)?" `Abdullah bin `Umar(R) said, "I untied my garment that was going round my back and legs while I was sitting and was about to say, 'He who fought against you and against your father(Abu Sufiyan) for the sake of Islam(i.e Ali(R)), is more rightful to be a Caliph(than you and your son),' but I was afraid that my statement might produce differences amongst the people and cause bloodshed, and my statement might be interpreted not as I intended. (So I kept quiet) remembering what Allah has prepared in the Gardens of Paradise (for those who are patient and prefer the Hereafter to this worldly life)." Habib said, "You did what kept you safe and secure (i.e. you were wise in doing so).
---- Sahih Al-Bukhari 4108
This incident took place after the death of Hasan ibn Ali(R) , when Muawiya broke Hasan-Muawiya treaty and appointed his son Yazeed ibn Muawiya as his successor in caliphate after him.
People who stay quiet and don't condemn people with bad character and morals are called hypocrite the world over, in every country and in every society, period.
Bani ummayah lover / defender , his love for bani ummayah is greater by far than his love for ahlul bayt
And uour love of Ahlul Bayt is Naujubillah more that Allah od his Prophet ,thats why most pf the Shias do shiirkh in the name of 12 imam
Look at them trying their best to defend yazeed 😢
If you don't have patience to listen then don't comment,
This guy better dealing with christian
Than speaking history of islam itself
Assalam o Alaikum everyone, please read the Khilafat o Malukiyat book by Syed Abul A'la Maududi. You will understand all the Islamic history clearly with the Quran and Hadith references. Jazak Allah ❤❤
No one shud read Maududi . hehe
Maududi is not too much knowledge
"Son of Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal asked him about his opinion on Yazid. So he replied: My son, is it possible that some one who claims to be a believer of Allah and still keeps friendship with Yazid. And how cannot I curse upon someone upon whom Allah has sent curse in Qur'an. His son asked, where does Qur'an curses him? He recited [surah Muhammad: 22-23]
This incident is also mentioned in Minhaj ul Sunnah of Ibn Taimiyyah
May Allah curse Yazeed(l.a)
Muawiya was brought up by the woman who chewed H Abbas .Pro’s uncle and Hussain was brought up by Allah’s Rasool .So follow who ever you want .and with whomever you want to be on Qyamah
Why did then Hasan ra made sulah with him
Tariq ibn Shihab reported: A man asked the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, “What is the best jihad?” The Prophet said, “A word of truth in front of a tyrannical ruler.”
Source: Musnad Aḥmad 18449
Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Al-Nawawi
Let's suppose that the one who martyrs Imam Hussain رضي الله عنه was not under the command/order of Yazeed (لعنة الله عليه), then he would have given a great punishment (in the form of Qasas i.e. death). But He didn't do it .
Moreover, He martyrs many Sahabas and burnt the cover (Ghilaf) of k3abah, tied the horses in the Masjid-an-Nabavi.
Did you know that the Prophet of Allah (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) could never tolerate his grandchildren (Hasan and Hussain رضي الله عنهما) in distress, in pain and in troublesome in this world/duniya, then how will he عليه السلام be able to bear the brutal assassination/martyrdom of Imam Hussain رضي الله عنه. The Beloved Prophet of Allah عليه افضل الصلاة والتسليم said: Fatima (رضي الله عنها) is the leader of Paradise women and Hassan and Hussain رضي الله عنهما are the leaders of Paradise youth. So how will those, who did this Zulam/wrong, be able to go to Jannah?
I am quoting from the books of Ahl-e-Sunnah, not from Shia books.
Whoever associates anything with Allah will taste the fire of Hell. But under the guise of monotheism/Tauheed, hatred of Ahlul Bayt and praise of their killers will never lead you on the path of truth. And ultimately, do worry about your fate/end!!!
Finally, I wanna make it clear that I am a Sunni and I have nothing to do with Shiites.
@Ex - Engineer Mirza Follower That means that you wanna prove that Hazrat Ali رضي الله عنه was the helper of Uthman(رضي الله عنه)'s assassins. But alas! you didn't understand.
While in the books of Hadith it is clear that Haq (حق) is with Ali رضي الله عنه.
There was not a single person from whom Qisas had to be taken but there was a group of rebels and Qisas could not be taken from the rebels. And it is written in the books of hadith that Hazrat Umar سلام الله عليه ورضي الله عنه is a door against tribulations and on the day when Umar dies, tribulations will start spreading. Hazrat Ali had tried but the rebellion was growing stronger.
You are comparing Yazid ملعون to Ali سلام الله عليه.
استغفر الله العظيم.
لا حول ولا قوة الا بالله
Instead of defending Yazid, think of the Hereafter.
@Ex - Engineer Mirza Follower this idea of yours is Naasbiyat.
I'll debate on this topic InShaaAllah.
But these days, I'm preparing for my National level examination of Chemistry so I've no time yet. But as soon as I'll get free, I'll debate on this topic with reference of SaheeH Bukhari, SahiH Muslim and rest of books of Kutub e Sitta. InShaaAllah.
So be prepared.
@@choudharymaqsoodahmedsabar7889
You are right sr ❤👍
Nasibiz are not on ryt path
Islaam Suhaba e ikraaam ,Ahle bait, Zindabaad
@Ex - Engineer Mirza Follower Shia don't refer Bukhari & Muslim as their books of hadith, but I said I am Sunni, our mainstream hadith books are Bukhari, Muslim, Tirmidhi, Abu Dawood, Ibn-e-Majah, Nisai and Mishkat and many other. Whereas nahaj ul balagha etc are Shia books to whom I say are not correct and Authentic. So you can't say me Shia.
And I think neither you studied Islamic history and nor Hadith .
Wherein In hadith books, it is mentioned that Ali رضي الله عنه said I forgave everyone and I didn't forgave Muaavia رضي الله عنه. Amir Muawiyah رضي الله عنه and I will be judged on the Day of Judgment on the basis of truthfulness. So will you now deny Hadith of beloved Messenger صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم.
And you, Mr. will see what will happen with yazeed on Doomsday.
As per our belief, In terms of virtue/FaDhilat, Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddiq رضي الله عنه is on number one and Hazrat Ali رضي الله عنه is on number four. So if you have hadith books other than SiHahH Sitta, then do follow them, that're for you .
And Who Martyred Hazrat Umar رضي الله عنه is in Hell, who Martyred Hazrat Uthman رضي الله عنه is in Hell, who Martyred Hazrat Ali رضي الله عنه is in Hell, Who Martyred Amaar bin Yassar رضي الله عنه is in Hell, who Martyred Imam Hussain رضي الله عنه is in Hell.
AlHamdulillah, Neither we are رافضي , nor Naasbi.
@@choudharymaqsoodahmedsabar7889 MashaAllah yu are absolutely right
Appointing yezid as heir apparent was a mistake. Taking bayah by force was a mistake. Imam Hussein refused to give bayah. That's NOT a mistake.
exactly .. may the defenders of Yazeed be raised with Yazeed and the supporters of Hussian rA be raised along side him
@Borsalino Kizaru then yezid is guilty of double murder!
@Borsalino Kizaru he did, he always refused. The narration that says he wanted to give his bayah, is false. The chain has severe nawasib in it.
And one more thing
In sulah hasan condition was if imam hassan will be alive till muawiyah ra death then khilfat will be handed over to him
Otherwise ummat will be left with shura
So muawiyah ra broke the condition of sulah hassan so how can he be given clean chit in this
I don't know.
When I say this people call me rafdhi.
@@mdfarhanali4270 " if the whole world calls me a rafidhi for my love of Ahle Bayt, then let the whole world know that I am a rafidhi". Imam Shafei.
How can a muslim defend yazid is beyond me. So sad. Knowledge without A'qal (understanding) is fruitless and cause of much fitnah. Even if someone argues that yazid did not order the killing of prophet's grandson, he can't say for a second that he showed remorse or did anything to punish the killers. Yazid poked the severed head of husain (ra) with his stick. That tells everything. How can a muslim defend or harbor secret sympathy for a fasiq? Fear Allah (SWT), fear meeting Him on the day of judgement.
😁😁 He poked his head with stick, that is good alhamdulillah
Show me the narration where it says he poked the head of Hussain RA. He is not defending Yazeed. If you want the curses you can go to Rafidhas, we don't do that.
@@FahadKhan-np4lb
السَّلَامُ عَلَيكُم وَرَحمَةُ اللّٰهِ وَبَرَكَاتُهُ
Firstly I want to clear my stance I don't defend Yazid and I don't want to curse. Yes he made a mistake a big mistake, it was his duty to kill Ubaydillah ibn Ziyad instead of just removing him from being commander and his biggest mistake rather a sin is the battle of Harra. The attack on Makkah and Abdullah ibn az-Zubayr R.A
As for the hadith you are asking me huh, it's as follows:
"حَدَّثَنِي مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ الْحُسَيْنِ بْنِ إِبْرَاهِيمَ، قَالَ حَدَّثَنِي حُسَيْنُ بْنُ مُحَمَّدٍ، حَدَّثَنَا جَرِيرٌ، عَنْ مُحَمَّدٍ، عَنْ أَنَسِ بْنِ مَالِكٍ ـ رضى الله عنه ـ أُتِيَ عُبَيْدُ اللَّهِ بْنُ زِيَادٍ بِرَأْسِ الْحُسَيْنِ ـ عَلَيْهِ السَّلاَمُ ـ فَجُعِلَ فِي طَسْتٍ، فَجَعَلَ يَنْكُتُ، وَقَالَ فِي حُسْنِهِ شَيْئًا. فَقَالَ أَنَسٌ كَانَ أَشْبَهَهُمْ بِرَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم، وَكَانَ مَخْضُوبًا بِالْوَسْمَةِ."
Narrated Muhammad:
Anas bin Malik said, "The head of Al-Husain was brought to 'Ubaidullah bin Ziyad and was put in a tray, and then Ibn Ziyad started playing with a stick at the nose and mouth of Al-Husain's head and saying something about his handsome features." Anas then said (to him), "Al-Husain resembled the Prophet (ﷺ) more than the others did." Anas added, "His (i.e. Al-Husain's) hair was dyed with Wasma (i.e. a kind of plant used as a dye).
Sahih al-Bukhari, 3748
Uneither have aqal nor knowledge to begin with brother..
Please improve your historical knowledge before posting any historical lectures.
Didnt you hear him quote the books?
I want to show you something else.
Sahih al-Bukhari 3671
Narrated Muhammad bin Al-Hanafiya:
I asked my father (`Ali bin Abi Talib), "Who are the best people after Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) ?" He said, "Abu Bakr." I asked, "Who then?" He said, "Then `Umar. " I was afraid he would say "Uthman, so I said, "Then you?" He said, "I am only an ordinary person.
حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ كَثِيرٍ، أَخْبَرَنَا سُفْيَانُ، حَدَّثَنَا جَامِعُ بْنُ أَبِي رَاشِدٍ، حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو يَعْلَى، عَنْ مُحَمَّدِ ابْنِ الْحَنَفِيَّةِ، قَالَ قُلْتُ لأَبِي أَىُّ النَّاسِ خَيْرٌ بَعْدَ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم قَالَ أَبُو بَكْرٍ. قُلْتُ ثُمَّ مَنْ قَالَ ثُمَّ عُمَرُ. وَخَشِيتُ أَنْ يَقُولَ عُثْمَانُ قُلْتُ ثُمَّ أَنْتَ قَالَ مَا أَنَا إِلاَّ رَجُلٌ مِنَ الْمُسْلِمِينَ.
Sahih al-Bukhari 3656
[interpetation]
Narrated Ibn `Abbas:
The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "If I were to take a Khalil, I would have taken Abu Bakr, but he is my brother and my companion (in Islam).
حَدَّثَنَا مُسْلِمُ بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ، حَدَّثَنَا وُهَيْبٌ، حَدَّثَنَا أَيُّوبُ، عَنْ عِكْرِمَةَ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ ـ رضى الله عنهما ـ عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم قَالَ " وَلَوْ كُنْتُ مُتَّخِذًا مِنْ أُمَّتِي خَلِيلاً لاَتَّخَذْتُ، أَبَا بَكْرٍ وَلَكِنْ أَخِي وَصَاحِبِي ".
Reference : Sahih al-Bukhari 3656
In-book reference : Book 62, Hadith 8
Sahih al-Bukhari 3662
Narrated `Amr bin Al-As:
The Prophet (ﷺ) deputed me to read the Army of Dhat-as-Salasil. I came to him and said, "Who is the most beloved person to you?" He said, " `Aisha." I asked, "Among the men?" He said, "Her father." I said, "Who then?" He said, "Then `Umar bin Al-Khattab." He then named other men.
حَدَّثَنَا مُعَلَّى بْنُ أَسَدٍ، حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ الْعَزِيزِ بْنُ الْمُخْتَارِ، قَالَ خَالِدٌ الْحَذَّاءُ حَدَّثَنَا عَنْ أَبِي عُثْمَانَ، قَالَ حَدَّثَنِي عَمْرُو بْنُ الْعَاصِ ـ رضى الله عنه ـ أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صلى الله عليه وسلم بَعَثَهُ عَلَى جَيْشِ ذَاتِ السَّلاَسِلِ، فَأَتَيْتُهُ فَقُلْتُ أَىُّ النَّاسِ أَحَبُّ إِلَيْكَ قَالَ " عَائِشَةُ ". فَقُلْتُ مِنَ الرِّجَالِ فَقَالَ " أَبُوهَا ". قُلْتُ ثُمَّ مَنْ قَالَ " ثُمَّ عُمَرُ بْنُ الْخَطَّابِ ". فَعَدَّ رِجَالاً.
Reference : Sahih al-Bukhari 3662
In-book reference : Book 62, Hadith 14
USC-MSA web (English) reference : Vol. 5, Book 57, Hadith 1
I wrote 'historical'(tareekh) is weak and needs to be improved, his knowledge of Bukhari, Al-Bani and other hadeeth/ riwayat is great I'm sure, although we don't take these hadeeth as sahih. Historical accounts were mostly incorrect and the context was wrong and this can be seen from most books of tareekh.
@@dienaarvandeschepper9213 I hope you know we don't trust your books Bukhari, Muslim etc
@@dienaarvandeschepper9213 just as an example think about this: he said many sahabah told the imam of their time (Hussain ibn Ali) to not go to Iraq because they knew jt was dangerous and did not help him in battle against the enemies of Islam. This would only be ok if they though Yazeed was the legitimate ruler instead of Hussain. And from that you can conclude that the sheikh thinks the same I.e. Hussain was wrong and Yazeed was right
@@smhark786 you don't take hadiths mashallah "your books Bukhari Muslim etc." Do you know of hadith books more authentic or do your desires only lead you to cherrypick hadiths from any book? Authubillah and you say brush up on your knowledge when you're even ignorant regarding the other half of the deen which is the hikmah the Sunnah of the prophet ﷺ given to us through hadiths
Nasibiyat has penetrated deep in ahlesunnat. Feel sorry for Christian who are reverting inspiring from these nasibees. I consider ahlesunnat and shia as muslims but am against the nasibees and ghalis in them.
These wahhabis/salafies obsession with defending muawiyah and yazid is beyond comprehension.how can one deny his cruel treatment of ahlul bait and his armies' attack on makkah and medinah.
Bro Wahabbis are not Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama.
These Wahabbis are some what nasbis. It is the fundamental Aqeeda of Ahlus Sunnah that Maula Ali (AS) was on Haq ( but we dont disrespect Ameer Muawwiya RA, his Mistake is Ijtihati and between him and Allah).
..
Also it is the opinion of 99% of Scholars of Ahlus Sunnah that Yazeed was a opressor, a deviant, and responsibility for numerous crimes.
..
Regarding his Imaan, the best opinion is to be silent. We dont curse Yazeed, but but but, we also don't stop the person who curses him.
May Allah curse be upon the killers of Imam Hussain, sons of Ali and upon those who prosecuted Ahlul Madina, and upon those who tied horses in Masjid Nabwi.
We don't stay silent. We don't love him. There is nothing about him that was good.
That's okay...just don't takfir without knowledge
@@md.shahadathossain8880 No, not takfir. That's to be left to Allah. I am just stating what is obvious. Even Umar r.a. said that after the Revelation, we can only judge by what is apparent.
In this case, so much injustice was done that it is apparent we can say as much as I did. But no more than that.
Jazakallohu khairan from Indonesia
Shaik What Action Did Yazeed Takes Against Killer Of Hussain as (Lanatis)
The quote of Muhammad ibn al-Hanafiyya is mostly taken out pf context. There's also a quote by Ibn Muti(RA) in the passage. Which negates the former. Allama Zubayr Zaee did tehqeeq of this narrative.
(If I'm not mistaken, and Allah knows the best.)
Yes you are right.. All those who wants to display a Yazeed a good person take those statement out of context... But Alhamdulillah, it is enough for all Muslim Ummah, that all the Muhaddisen e Karam didn't take any single hadith from Yazeed Ibn Muawiyaah. And this is the ijmah of the whole Ummah that Yazeed was barbaric and harsh ruler.. but unfortunately now a days, there some people out there who is upon the manhaj of the nasbiyat o yazidiyat..
Sahih al-Bukhari 3671
Narrated Muhammad bin Al-Hanafiya:
I asked my father (`Ali bin Abi Talib), "Who are the best people after Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) ?" He said, "Abu Bakr." I asked, "Who then?" He said, "Then `Umar. " I was afraid he would say "Uthman, so I said, "Then you?" He said, "I am only an ordinary person.
حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ كَثِيرٍ، أَخْبَرَنَا سُفْيَانُ، حَدَّثَنَا جَامِعُ بْنُ أَبِي رَاشِدٍ، حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو يَعْلَى، عَنْ مُحَمَّدِ ابْنِ الْحَنَفِيَّةِ، قَالَ قُلْتُ لأَبِي أَىُّ النَّاسِ خَيْرٌ بَعْدَ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم قَالَ أَبُو بَكْرٍ. قُلْتُ ثُمَّ مَنْ قَالَ ثُمَّ عُمَرُ. وَخَشِيتُ أَنْ يَقُولَ عُثْمَانُ قُلْتُ ثُمَّ أَنْتَ قَالَ مَا أَنَا إِلاَّ رَجُلٌ مِنَ الْمُسْلِمِينَ.
Sahih al-Bukhari 3656
[interpetation]
Narrated Ibn `Abbas:
The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "If I were to take a Khalil, I would have taken Abu Bakr, but he is my brother and my companion (in Islam).
حَدَّثَنَا مُسْلِمُ بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ، حَدَّثَنَا وُهَيْبٌ، حَدَّثَنَا أَيُّوبُ، عَنْ عِكْرِمَةَ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ ـ رضى الله عنهما ـ عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم قَالَ " وَلَوْ كُنْتُ مُتَّخِذًا مِنْ أُمَّتِي خَلِيلاً لاَتَّخَذْتُ، أَبَا بَكْرٍ وَلَكِنْ أَخِي وَصَاحِبِي ".
Reference : Sahih al-Bukhari 3656
In-book reference : Book 62, Hadith 8
Sahih al-Bukhari 3662
Narrated `Amr bin Al-As:
The Prophet (ﷺ) deputed me to read the Army of Dhat-as-Salasil. I came to him and said, "Who is the most beloved person to you?" He said, " `Aisha." I asked, "Among the men?" He said, "Her father." I said, "Who then?" He said, "Then `Umar bin Al-Khattab." He then named other men.
حَدَّثَنَا مُعَلَّى بْنُ أَسَدٍ، حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ الْعَزِيزِ بْنُ الْمُخْتَارِ، قَالَ خَالِدٌ الْحَذَّاءُ حَدَّثَنَا عَنْ أَبِي عُثْمَانَ، قَالَ حَدَّثَنِي عَمْرُو بْنُ الْعَاصِ ـ رضى الله عنه ـ أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صلى الله عليه وسلم بَعَثَهُ عَلَى جَيْشِ ذَاتِ السَّلاَسِلِ، فَأَتَيْتُهُ فَقُلْتُ أَىُّ النَّاسِ أَحَبُّ إِلَيْكَ قَالَ " عَائِشَةُ ". فَقُلْتُ مِنَ الرِّجَالِ فَقَالَ " أَبُوهَا ". قُلْتُ ثُمَّ مَنْ قَالَ " ثُمَّ عُمَرُ بْنُ الْخَطَّابِ ". فَعَدَّ رِجَالاً.
Reference : Sahih al-Bukhari 3662
In-book reference : Book 62, Hadith 14
USC-MSA web (English) reference : Vol. 5, Book 57, Hadith 1
Yes, even Imam Ahmad confirm this
I heard Salah ibn Ahmad ibn Hanbal say, "I said to my father, "Indeed, there is a group of people accusing us of being in love with Yazid! So he said, 'O my son, will a believer who believes in God love Yazid?! So I said, "Why don't you curse him?" He replied, "When did you witness me cursing someone? Why is not a cursed person whom God has cursed in His Holy Book?" I said, "In which verse does God curse Yazid?" So he recited the verse:
فَهَلْ عَسَيْتُمْ إِنْ تَوَلَّيتُمْ انُ تُسِدُوا فِ الْرْضِ وَ تُقِّعُوا رَحمَكُمْ * أُولئِكَ الَّذينَ لَعَنَهُمُ اللَُّّ فَأَصَمَّهُمْ وَ اَ عْمي أَبْصارَهُمْ
"Then what if you are in power, you will cause damage on the face of the earth and break family ties * Those are the people whom God cursed and He deafened their ears and blinded their sight."
Is there more destruction than genocide?!
Qadhi Abul Hasan; Muhammad ibn Qadhi Abu Ya'la al Farrâ' wrote a book explaining who has the right to be cursed/cursed. In it he mentions Yazid as worthy of being cursed. He said, "The person who forbids cursing Yazid is sometimes an ignorant person (who does not understand) that it is allowed, or a hypocrite who intends to deceive the ignorant public. And it may be that he deceives them by saying, "A believer does not like cursing."
Salaam I just can't understand how they killed Hussain the prophets peace be upon him.This was something I cant understand how they killed Hussain as he was with his family only a group of 70.The Sunni need to speak out about this grave injustice and murder.Allah knows best
Excuses for Yazid
This not the version of Ahl as sunnah
I see Nasibi and khariji traits
Do you even know what kharijite means? No kharijite ever tell the others to Obey a ruler bruh
😂😂
Silence Shia
I am a sunni Muslim but i hate about sunni trying to get in the good books and trying to justify yazeed
This was not khilafa this was dictatorship which is stablished by muavia
What have you done for Muslims that you speak badly about Muaviye (radıyallahü anh)
The history is well known to both sides. Some were blinded then because of the influence of the Umayyads. Some are blinde today because the Umayyads played a major role in making Islam a dominant force in the world. In doing so they have tarnished the image of Islam even to this day. Let's be clear, Allah did not need them to make His deen dominant. Form the moment rasulallah (saw) breathed his last breath his family was treated poorly. This cannot be ignored. Allah allowed them to be successful in the establishment of the deen. They will be rewarded for any good they did and either punished or forgiven for their wrong, Allahu alim.
Sheikh I read a book of İmam ibn jozi against Yazeed and If as you said that he was not against the İmam Hussain than he has other mistakes like waqai-e-Hurra and attack on Kaaba . And I think most of ahlesunnah stands with ibn jozzi Rahmaullah ,only Saudis scholars praise yazeed and muzafar Madni and some other scholars of ahlehadees call him Rahmaullah ,I don't know this reaction is against rafazis or in bughz e Hussain R.A.
You're right, Alhamdulillah the Ahlul hadith of today are sell outs, They protect Yazeed to protect Muawiya r.a to protect Banu Umayya
@@Prince-Ibrahim for what purpose? hear yourself a bit you'll have to come with that accusation on your neck in front of Allah. That is straight up slander.
@@hmzzrg5045 Yazeed was the first one to bring monarchy and abolish khilafa and the Saudi regime of today is also a version of the yazeedi regime
@@Prince-Ibrahim what is monarchy ? Isn’t it the process of choosing the successor from your own children ? Then Muawiyah is the one who started Monarchy
@@sheikhmd.salman9692 right
This lecture has sadly been very disappointing as I saw nothing but whitewashing and revisionism of Yazeed et. al. Many of the analogies you gave were outright wrong. e.g. Muhammad ibn Hanaffiyah one, Amr ibn Sa'ad one, etc. I came here with high expectations as I had seen your Hadith Sciences mini-series, but sadly as you said no scholar can be perfect. May Allah guide us and not raise us with Yazeed or among his supporters.
This is the perfect view. Not too loving and not cursing him either, reported from authentic hadith
You are the one with a biased perception of yazid
If you are a sufi Then may Allah raise Ghazali With yazeed because he send rehmah upon yazeed.
In Islam there is no probabilities either good or bad you can't categorise a person in two faces ie yazid
Sahih al-Bukhari 3671
Narrated Muhammad bin Al-Hanafiya:
I asked my father (`Ali bin Abi Talib), "Who are the best people after Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) ?" He said, "Abu Bakr." I asked, "Who then?" He said, "Then `Umar. " I was afraid he would say "Uthman, so I said, "Then you?" He said, "I am only an ordinary person.
حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ كَثِيرٍ، أَخْبَرَنَا سُفْيَانُ، حَدَّثَنَا جَامِعُ بْنُ أَبِي رَاشِدٍ، حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو يَعْلَى، عَنْ مُحَمَّدِ ابْنِ الْحَنَفِيَّةِ، قَالَ قُلْتُ لأَبِي أَىُّ النَّاسِ خَيْرٌ بَعْدَ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم قَالَ أَبُو بَكْرٍ. قُلْتُ ثُمَّ مَنْ قَالَ ثُمَّ عُمَرُ. وَخَشِيتُ أَنْ يَقُولَ عُثْمَانُ قُلْتُ ثُمَّ أَنْتَ قَالَ مَا أَنَا إِلاَّ رَجُلٌ مِنَ الْمُسْلِمِينَ.
Sahih al-Bukhari 3656
[interpetation]
Narrated Ibn `Abbas:
The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "If I were to take a Khalil, I would have taken Abu Bakr, but he is my brother and my companion (in Islam).
حَدَّثَنَا مُسْلِمُ بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ، حَدَّثَنَا وُهَيْبٌ، حَدَّثَنَا أَيُّوبُ، عَنْ عِكْرِمَةَ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ ـ رضى الله عنهما ـ عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم قَالَ " وَلَوْ كُنْتُ مُتَّخِذًا مِنْ أُمَّتِي خَلِيلاً لاَتَّخَذْتُ، أَبَا بَكْرٍ وَلَكِنْ أَخِي وَصَاحِبِي ".
Reference : Sahih al-Bukhari 3656
In-book reference : Book 62, Hadith 8
Sahih al-Bukhari 3662
Narrated `Amr bin Al-As:
The Prophet (ﷺ) deputed me to read the Army of Dhat-as-Salasil. I came to him and said, "Who is the most beloved person to you?" He said, " `Aisha." I asked, "Among the men?" He said, "Her father." I said, "Who then?" He said, "Then `Umar bin Al-Khattab." He then named other men.
حَدَّثَنَا مُعَلَّى بْنُ أَسَدٍ، حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ الْعَزِيزِ بْنُ الْمُخْتَارِ، قَالَ خَالِدٌ الْحَذَّاءُ حَدَّثَنَا عَنْ أَبِي عُثْمَانَ، قَالَ حَدَّثَنِي عَمْرُو بْنُ الْعَاصِ ـ رضى الله عنه ـ أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صلى الله عليه وسلم بَعَثَهُ عَلَى جَيْشِ ذَاتِ السَّلاَسِلِ، فَأَتَيْتُهُ فَقُلْتُ أَىُّ النَّاسِ أَحَبُّ إِلَيْكَ قَالَ " عَائِشَةُ ". فَقُلْتُ مِنَ الرِّجَالِ فَقَالَ " أَبُوهَا ". قُلْتُ ثُمَّ مَنْ قَالَ " ثُمَّ عُمَرُ بْنُ الْخَطَّابِ ". فَعَدَّ رِجَالاً.
Reference : Sahih al-Bukhari 3662
In-book reference : Book 62, Hadith 14
USC-MSA web (English) reference : Vol. 5, Book 57, Hadith 1
The Sunni sect found it very difficult to side with the Prophet's grandson and suddenly found it reasonable to abstain from falsehood. I feel that the Sunni sect is actually a supporter of the Muawiya regime.
That is false. Only nasibi support them.
We support Mu'awiyah only because he was sahaba and helped write the Quran. Yazid is just random guy
@@sy6553 Yes we respect and honour Hazrat Muawiya (R.A.).
But Hazrat Ali (R.A.) was on Haqq in the battle of Siffin and he was much higher in status than Hazrat Muawiya (R.A.).
@@Adil-uk7vh of course but you have to remember, battle of siffin was caused by the khawarij. Mu'awiyah had no intention to fight ali, he just wanted justice for his cousin. The khawarij murdered Mu'awiyahs men at night and made them think a battle happened. Mu'awiyah recognised Ali as above him and used to ask him for knowledge on Islamic matters
@@sy6553 Thank you for your insight. If you provide refrences for this it would make my respect towards Hazrat Muawiya (R.A.) more.
May Allah swt raise this speaker with Yazid on the Day of Qiyamah if he does not repent!
Ameen
Ameen. We'll be happy to be raised with Ameer ul momineen
@@ahmadalbadr21You have batil aqeeda, while his father still be excused, no major Ahlussuna Ulema ever condone the actions and policies of that Yazed. Allahu Mustaan.
What did you think? Sahaba Abdullah Ibn Zubayr becomes a shaheed literally because of armies of Yazed!
I heard Salah ibn Ahmad ibn Hanbal say, "I said to my father, "Indeed, there is a group of people accusing us of being in love with Yazid! So he said, 'O my son, will a believer who believes in God love Yazid?! So I said, "Why don't you curse him?" He replied, "When did you witness me cursing someone? Why is not a cursed person whom God has cursed in His Holy Book?" I said, "In which verse does God curse Yazid?" So he recited the verse:
فَهَلْ عَسَيْتُمْ إِنْ تَوَلَّيتُمْ انُ تُسِدُوا فِ الْرْضِ وَ تُقِّعُوا رَحمَكُمْ * أُولئِكَ الَّذينَ لَعَنَهُمُ اللَُّّ فَأَصَمَّهُمْ وَ اَ عْمي أَبْصارَهُمْ
"Then what if you are in power, you will cause damage on the face of the earth and break family ties * Those are the people whom God cursed and He deafened their ears and blinded their sight."
Is there more destruction than genocide?!
Qadhi Abul Hasan; Muhammad ibn Qadhi Abu Ya'la al Farrâ' wrote a book explaining who has the right to be cursed/cursed. In it he mentions Yazid as worthy of being cursed. He said, "The person who forbids cursing Yazid is sometimes an ignorant person (who does not understand) that it is allowed, or a hypocrite who intends to deceive the ignorant public. And it may be that he deceives them by saying, "A believer does not like cursing."
Ameen
JazakAllah khair
RasoolaAllah mentioned that hussein is from me and I am from hussein meaning they are one and the same thing,to obey imam hussein is to obey RassolaAllah and is obey Allah azwj.
i love hussain and all the muslims.
Narrated Ibn Abi Na'm:
I was present when a man asked Ibn `Umar about the blood of mosquitoes. Ibn `Umar said, "From where are you?" The man replied. "From Iraq." Ibn `Umar said, "Look at that! he is asking me about the blood of Mosquitoes while they (the Iraqis ) have killed the (grand) son of the Prophet. I have heard the Prophet (ﷺ) saying, "They (Hasan and Husain) are my two sweet-smelling flowers in this world."
Sahih Al Bukhari 5994
We should not have any soft corner for yazeed.
Caliphate of yazeed 😂. Then i am Einstein
Can we get Sheikh’s notes uploaded as well JazakAllahu khairen
ijtehad
I left Salafi sect. Bcoz Salafi are lovers of Yazeed PALEED. Now I'm Muslim following Quran Sunnah and Lover of Ahlul bayat alai hi salaam
Always check yourself to see if your intellect is strong enough to ask yourself if maybe YOU don't have the full picture. Otherwise dont perish on falsehood like youre doing
Read KHILAFAT O MALUKIYAT by Syed Abul A'la Maududi
you will understand the history clearly
You Watch Hafiz Abu Yahyah Noorpuri Sahab Video on this topic In Urdu
Dear Shaikh,
I love you, listen to you a lot, and follow your words as well. But, here i would disagree with you.
I do not have much knowledge but i would mention here that just because of victories you mentioned Yazeed as a great leader i think this is not good and by mentioning this you are paving a way to have softness for him in hearts which is really very unacceptable.
2nd point while debating with christians you mentioned many times that muslims never initiated iqdaami jihaad. And here in this video you are appreciating Yazeed as great leader for his iqdaami victories.
On top of this Yazeed never asked for qisaas from his generals over Shahadat e Hussain Raziallau Anhu.
How do you see this as he has full responsibility of waqia e karbala Shahadat e Hussain Raziallau Anhu
Further, the motive of Hazrat Hussain Raziallau Anhu was not to rule or to take khilafat for his own interests but for the Muslim ummah as Yazeed was not worthy of Khilafat even was dangerous for Deen e Islam. And imagine if Hazrat Hussain Raziallau Anhu wouldn't have taken these steps how badly Yazeed would have destroyed Deen e islam and Muslim ummah.
In my opinion and might be of many other scholars that ijthaad of Hazrat Hussain Raziallau Anhu was 200% right.
🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺plzz do research on this again
We dont love yazid.
We don't
Never
We love yazid r, a, yazid zindabad
You
There’s so much wrong in your lectures I don’t know where to start correcting.
Brother my sincere advice is to fear Allāh when you talk about the deen, politics & history. Keep silent and study more.
You’re a mouthpiece for Umayyad & Saudi propaganda and you probably don’t even realise it.
May Allāh give you wisdom.
What did he say that was wrong? Provide some examples and stop with the accusations.
@@Omar_Live
I commented on his last video
ua-cam.com/video/9pze_eq5aPw/v-deo.html
Its gonna take a long time pin pointing every mistake. He doesn’t critically analyse anything. He just repeats what IslamQa claim and the modern day salafi narrative.
Here’s a big mistake - when he makes sweeping statements like “the position of ahlul sunnah wal Jamā’ah Re: unjust kings (Yazeed), is to not curse him”.
To prove such a claim he needs to have studied the opinions of dozens of the classical scholars and combined and compared their opinions - which I doubt he did. Furthermore that statement implies an overwhelming majority or consensus. He likely relied on the opinions of a few Banu Umayyad sympathisers like Ibn Mubārak or Ibn Taymiyyah,
There a lot of Sunni scholars that spoke against Mu’āwiyah and Yazeed, and many that cursed Yazeed because of a famous hadeeth RE the one that puts fear in the hearts of the people of Madinah.
Btw Im not accusing him of anything, I’m critiquing his lectures, they are weak and unreliable.
you should take your own advice. You tell him to fear Allah, then the next sentence you call him names.
@@liby254
Using a public platform to Cover and distort wrongdoings - makes you a mouthpiece for propaganda.
Not an insult, just a fact.
@@randomjoy8411 so why dont you make a video telling us the entire full story, then since you know it while he dosent?
Sheikh I’m Sunni Muslim and please don’t place or put muawiyah the same place as 4 or imam khalifah or imamul muminin. It’s not right..
You think you are more knowledgebl3 than Sheikh .Muwabiyah (RA)was Sahabi and is Jannati Insha Allah ❤❤❤❤
Yazeed was horrible!!!!! im sunni i hate him
Yazeed to you
Hussain (A.S.) for us
nasbiyat is such a injection
MASHA ALLAH, TABARAK ALLAH, SUBHAN ALLAH, JAZAK ALLAH KHAIR BROTHER 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
O people dont cling to people like mawiya and yazid simly because hating them groups you in with the shia. It is not their hearts that are blind but their hearts.
It was not suitable for Muawiya Ra to make his son a king when there were Very Nobel Sahaba of the highest ranks like Hussain Ra and Ibn Zubair Ra alive. And Yazid was not even a Sahabi. Plus Muawiya Ra in his life himself began taking pledge for Yazid forcibly from people
Sheikh uthman please try to simplify you vocabulary, because a lot of us are new to these things, words like Zuhud or fadayal are difficult to understand. Jazakallhu khairan for your efforts.
Asalamualaykum.just search up the meaning. Strive for knowledge
1500 years later still this political party debating who is better than who.
I dont know why we muslims became like Christian that much we talk about hussein..are we more than Allah care about Hussain ..hes with Allah happy now .Im sure most of us not praying fajr ..lets work on ourslef
Masha Allah bro ,the best of all comments
siding with Haq is mandatory in Islam. Husayn AS is on truth and Yazid was on falsehood
Sounds like Muawiya's (rA) dua was answered because Yazid died in his thirties.
yazid killed Hussayn AS and burned the KAABA
Those who curse yazid let them and those who don’t let them too … but do not praise yazid because the love of Hussain Ra is unconditional and our iman ❤
Those don’t curse just because they believe that yazid was not involved in killing of Hussain Ra and he gave punishment to those , but actually it’s wrong as iam also of the view that ok for once believe he was not involved ? But did he punish the culprits ?
And one thing more why was yazid given khilafat? Why not Hussain ibne Ali Ra the grandson of Prophet Muhammad SAW? Not only because of his lineage but because of piousness and qualities , why he didn’t give bayat to yazid ?
May Allah wake up supporter of yazeed with yazeed in the day of judgement.
May the lanat of Allah be on yazeed, may the lanat of the angels be on yazeed, may the lanat of the prophets be on yazeed and may lanat of every human being be on yazeed
Ameen
The son of nuh as was a disbeliever. And even nuh as couldn't save him. Like muawiya ra as a companion also wouldn't save his son on judgement day. And nuh as is a rasul and Hazrat muawiya ra is just a companion. So, there is no comparison.
If you any sincerity for islam brother do more research ... First of all there many people who refused to give bayah to yazeeed . Abdullah ibn abbas and abdullah ibn umar ra. Didnt give him bayah at first and also revolt of People of madinah you forgot that ...
How can you say khilafa it's was not khilafa it was malukiyat.......really disappointed
Not all shia are rafidhi..
You are following ibn e tahmmiya , who had the bugz of ahlulbayt..
Why you don't have feelings about imam's , about karbala? Why don't you cry?
YAZEED IBN PALEED
I haven't heard the full lecture but it woukd ve sad to know that u being one of the most learned persons will have a soft corner regarding banu umayya..
U know sahih al bukhari 2812 and others.. I hope u are not a nasbi
Plz debate Engineer Ali Mirza about Muawiyah and Yajeed. How can you defend both of them. And Muawiyah is not a Caliph he was just a ruler of mislim thats it
Most of the academicians who study Hadith have said that what’s stated by shias is not authentic and mostly emotional.
Based on what evidence?
I am surprised to see the comments of the people here. They are all so indulged in the stories of the rafidah that they are even abusing their own scholars. No doubt the sign of the day of judgment is that the knowledge will be far less and people will debate on the matters that they don't even know.
None of these people have even read Al Bidhaya wa'l Nihaya which itself is eight volumes and they are debating on a topic which covered in hundreds of books across history.
Rafidah and the likes of Mirza (II) are trying to mix and match the ahadith and bringing forth only half the opinion of the scholars and hiding the rest are intentionally avoiding a live debate. Even a Pakistani Hanafi scholar Mufti Tariq Masood reached the city of Mirza (II) to set the time and place for the debate but he never responded and came up with an excuse that Mufti Tariq should've came on the weekend. LAME.
when people wear the cloak like that, left arm in the sleeve and the right arm not in the sleeve. is that from the sunnah?
No but does everything need to be? The head scarf of the gulf is not sunnah either, the turban is.
@Al Qur'an reference for what? i asked a question myself
@Al Qur'an no problem,take care
I feel that you are somehow favoring Yazid and blaming Imam Hussain, may God be pleased with him, for going to Karbala. There is no doubt that Abdullah bin Umar and Abdullah bin Abbas, may Allah be pleased with them all، advised him to cancel the decision and not go to Kufa, but that was what Allah SWT destiny had to be done. You mentioned Yazid's conquests, while the martyrdom of Imam Hussain, may Allah be pleased with him, the grandson of the Messenger of Allah SAW , and the companions of the Messenger of Allah SAW, was done by the order of Yazid bin Muawiya. It's Yazid's kingdom not caliphate in any way, this is a mistake that people make, the name of caliphate should not be kept above Yazid's oppressive and exclusive rule.
Imam hussain didn't go to karbala for fighting, He went there to launch a dawah against yazid sulah hassan was broken by muawiyah ra as he didn't leave ummah with shura.
So these 20 years from fighting against imam ali ended with shahdat of imam hussain.
the prophets grandson
muslim loves a muslim,
if some muslims are hating for his sins, they should also look inside themselves and should look how they have broken the Shariah of Allah. so the safest way is to help muslims gain forgiveness from Allah, and not being the reason for them punished.
yazeed (رحمه الله) did not kill of hussain (رضي الله عنه)
that was an armies and ubadullah ibn ziyad was killing hussain (رضي الله عنه)
shia use to curse yazeed
لعنة الله على يزيد بن معاوية.
If NOT respecting the people that killed an fought ahlul bayt makes you a rafida, then I thank you for the compliment !
Sunnis making excuses for the likes of Yazid and Muawiya says a lot about their real views of ahlul bayt and the prophet saws
Masha Allah Sheikh ❤❤❤❤❤
Shame on you
This sheikh was giggling why explaining how he witnessed rival gang members ( he publicly stated in an interview he used to be part of a gang crew in California) being tortured to death. He found it amusing. So yeah, he can relate to yazid the drunkard and filthy eject.
😂😂😂😂
I am going to listen to it. I have huge respect for you Mr Usman. Your attitude towards Lanati Yazeed will let me decide whether you have Nasbiyat or not.
sheikh I see haqq missing in this lecture. You sound to be liberal in the approach. May Allah guide us to speak haqq.
can we get thee references please?
Imam Hussain was not an ordinary Muslim
He is Head of Paradise dwellers as declared by Rasool Allah
We’ll appreciated for the ilm shaykhuna
کتیا. بهونک رهی هی یقیناً ملعونه است
شیعه ملعون قاتلین حسین هین یقینا انکی هی کتایون مین محفوظ هیی سمجهو
یه خبیث النفس حرامی بکواسات کر رها هی
خنزیر کی اولاد هیی سمجهو. لعت الله علی الکاذبین یه بد بخت شیعه رافضی. قاتلین حسین هین یقینا علی رضی الله عنه کو. بهی شیعان کوفه نی. شهید کیا الله کی لعنت رافضی شیعه مرزایی قادیانیبادیانAM پر. کتیا بهونک رهی هین یقینا فحش غلطی پر هی یقیناً خیریت نهین اسکی خنزیر کی اولاد دشمن ال رسول الله صلی الله علیه و سلم هی دجالی فتنه هی ضرور تباه هی یقیناً متعه کی ست هی
اب سنو یزید بن معاویه رضی الله عنهما امیر المومنین خلفای راشدین مین سی هین رسول الله صلی الله علیه و سلم کی سالیی هین اهل
بیت هین یقینا مغفور علییهم هین کما قال رسول الله صلی الله علیه و سلم نی فرمایا مغفور علیهم هین غزوه البحر مین شریک هونیی والیی
اور غزوه قسطنطنیه کی سب. مغفور علیهم اجمعین. جبکه امیر یزید اس لشکر کی امیر تهیی ابو ایوب انصاری بهی شریک تهیی رضی الله عنهم
توبه کرین بکواس کنی والیی وقت هاته نهین اییگا معاذالله استغفرالله صحابه اور تابعین کی خلاف هرزه رسانی توبه کرو ان بطش ربک لشدید الله کی پکر سخت هیی سمجهو وقت دوباره هاته نهین اییگا معاذالله استغفرالله جهنمی کتییا مت بنو
کتیا. بهونک رهی هی یقیناً ملعونه است
شیعه ملعون قاتلین حسین هین یقینا انکی هی کتایون مین محفوظ هیی سمجهو
یه خبیث النفس حرامی بکواسات کر رها هی
خنزیر کی اولاد هیی سمجهو. لعت الله علی الکاذبین یه بد بخت شیعه رافضی. قاتلین حسین هین یقینا علی رضی الله عنه کو. بهی شیعان کوفه نی. شهید کیا الله کی لعنت رافضی شیعه مرزایی قادیانیبادیانAM پر. کتیا بهونک رهی هین یقینا فحش غلطی پر هی یقیناً خیریت نهین اسکی خنزیر کی اولاد دشمن ال رسول الله صلی الله علیه و سلم هی دجالی فتنه هی ضرور تباه هی یقیناً متعه کی ست هی
اب سنو یزید بن معاویه رضی الله عنهما امیر المومنین خلفای راشدین مین سی هین رسول الله صلی الله علیه و سلم کی سالیی هین اهل
بیت هین یقینا مغفور علییهم هین کما قال رسول الله صلی الله علیه و سلم نی فرمایا مغفور علیهم هین غزوه البحر مین شریک هونیی والیی
اور غزوه قسطنطنیه کی سب. مغفور علیهم اجمعین. جبکه امیر یزید اس لشکر کی امیر تهیی ابو ایوب انصاری بهی شریک تهیی رضی الله عنهم
توبه کرین بکواس کنی والیی وقت هاته نهین اییگا معاذالله استغفرالله صحابه اور تابعین کی خلاف هرزه رسانی توبه کرو ان بطش ربک لشدید الله کی پکر سخت هیی سمجهو وقت دوباره هاته نهین اییگا معاذالله استغفرالله جهنمی کتییا مت بنو
کتیا. بهونک رهی هی یقیناً ملعونه است
شیعه ملعون قاتلین حسین هین یقینا انکی هی کتایون مین محفوظ هیی سمجهو
یه خبیث النفس حرامی بکواسات کر رها هی
خنزیر کی اولاد هیی سمجهو. لعت الله علی الکاذبین یه بد بخت شیعه رافضی. قاتلین حسین هین یقینا علی رضی الله عنه کو. بهی شیعان کوفه نی. شهید کیا الله کی لعنت رافضی شیعه مرزایی قادیانیبادیانAM پر. کتیا بهونک رهی هین یقینا فحش غلطی پر هی یقیناً خیریت نهین اسکی خنزیر کی اولاد دشمن ال رسول الله صلی الله علیه و سلم هی دجالی فتنه هی ضرور تباه هی یقیناً متعه کی ست هی
اب سنو یزید بن معاویه رضی الله عنهما امیر المومنین خلفای راشدین مین سی هین رسول الله صلی الله علیه و سلم کی سالیی هین اهل
بیت هین یقینا مغفور علییهم هین کما قال رسول الله صلی الله علیه و سلم نی فرمایا مغفور علیهم هین غزوه البحر مین شریک هونیی والیی
اور غزوه قسطنطنیه کی سب. مغفور علیهم اجمعین. جبکه امیر یزید اس لشکر کی امیر تهیی ابو ایوب انصاری بهی شریک تهیی رضی الله عنهم
توبه کرین بکواس کنی والیی وقت هاته نهین اییگا معاذالله استغفرالله صحابه اور تابعین کی خلاف هرزه رسانی توبه کرو ان بطش ربک لشدید الله کی پکر سخت هیی سمجهو وقت دوباره هاته نهین اییگا معاذالله استغفرالله جهنمی کتییا مت بنو
You said Yazeed is the great leader! That’s what you found in your analysis. With anyone with true heart will conclude he was the worst leader. May Allah guide you in the right path. You are talking about the Rome. Where is the Islam in Rome today?
I enjoy history, and I got to this video through random UA-cam algorithm-ing me after starting to watch Islamic history clips. But honestly, this entire lecture sounded like one single statement:
Everyone does good and bad, but everyone is good, but they did some bad, but we don't judge, cause they're human and they do good and bad.
It was just excuse after excuse to not say anything bad about anyone (except what keeps the fence-walking viable), apparently Muslims don't hold anyone accountable to anything - makes sense now why Muslim countries are ruled by dictators. Everyone just lets it happen. From what I can tell this is the mainstream Sunni narrative, I'll have to look at what the other sects say, hopefully there's normal human moral behavior left there somewhere.
Staying quiet is like supporting the enemies of al hussain.
I was brought up in a sunni household and i can say ahle sunnat have been hiding the fact from the beginning, ahle hadees specially they're nasbis (enemies of ahle baet).
To understand the story you'll have to go back to time of usman r.a. Usman was appointed as khalifa in old age and he was soft towards his relatives, his notorious tribe banu umaiya, one of his governor in kufa used to lead salah while being drunk, entertaining people with magician jew in masjid and many other faults in his governors, protesters surrounded him in madina for being so soft on these criminals, in result of this protest, few extremists end up killing the caliph.
Ali was appointed as the next caliph and Muawiya took control of egypt without the permission of Ali.
He gathered protesters against Ali to take revenge for usman, it is the manner of protest that protesters should gather up and march towards capital city, Madina was the capital city but they took people to basra with weapons on them. Ali and Muaviya had 2 wars and Ali won both of them. (Siffeen & jamal)
System was ruined and caliphate ended with the blood of more than hundred thousand companions
3 killers were released by khawarij at the time of fajr to assassinate Ali, Muawiya, and amr
Ali was killed in sujood, muaviya didn't come for prayer that day and amr survived the attack
Now the caliph is gone and people chose his son Hassan to continue caliphate
Hassan and Muaviya
Hassan came with 40k soldiers against muaviya. Amr ibne aas informed muaviya we won't survive against hassan.
Banu umaiya offered truce and according to chapter anfal القرآن
If your enemy offer truce even in the middle of war, accept it. Hassan gave them free hand by handing over caliphate ( usman ka badla lena tha, ab badhsahat de rha hun, le k btao ) Hassan accepted truce on 5 conditions.
-1 muaviya will run his kingdom on the orders of Allah and teachings of prophets
-2 soldiers of Ali won't be harmed
-3 muaviya will leave ummat on their own decision to chose their next ruler, but muaviya appointed his son yazeed 4 years before his death
4- ahle baet will get humus
5- cursing on Ali will be stopped
Only 4th condition was accepted, rest of the conditions were badly ruined.
Yazeed and Hussain ع
Hussain ع held himself back all these 20 years just because of the agreement of hassan and Muaviya, the day hassan was poisoned, the agreement was fully broken plus when yazeed was appointed as a next ruler. There was no need to have a monarch kingship when the nephew of prophet is still alive.
People of kufa wrote a letter to Hussain ع summoning him for a war against yazeed.
Hussain was on his way, yazeed was informed, he removed nouman ibne bashir, a sahabi, from his governor post of kufa and sent ubaidullah ibne ziyad, a cruel governor.
He entered the city kufa at midnight appearing to be hussain ع. People welcomed him and he ordered his soldiers to seize the city, poeple of kufa were Deceived and many were killed.
Stopped Hussain ع and his family in a scorching desert and killed each one of them one by one after torturing them with thirst and hunger. (Few escaped and came to our sindh)
Sunni scholars hide all this just to save monarchy loving father and son.
"Yazeed committed a mistake and that too a disgusting one by ordering Muslim bin Uqba to make Madina "mubah" for three days. This was his biggest and ugliest blunder. Many Sahaba and their children were slaughtered. As it has been mentioned before that Yazid made UbaydUllah Ibn Ziyad kill the grandson of Rasulullah (saw) Husayn and his companions, and in those three days huge heinous crimes happened in Madina about which nobody knows except Allah. Yazeed wanted to secure his governance by sending Muslim bin Uqbah but Allah did against his wishes and punished him. Verily Allah killed him likewise Allah made grip over the oppressing towns, no doubt His grip is painful and strict".[Al Bidayah Wal Nihayah, Vol 8 Page 283]
Yazid’s crimes were so heinous that even his loyal UbaidUllah Ibn Ziyad (whom he had sent to murder Muslim bin Aqeel and later Imam Hussain ra too) said:
كان يزيد كتب إلى عبد الله بن زياد أن يسير إلى الزبير فيحاصره بمكة فأبى عليه وقال والله لا أجمعهما للفاسق أبدا أقتل ابن بنت رسول الله ص وأغزو البيت الحرام وقد كانت أمه مرجانة قالت له حين قتل الحسين ويحك ماذا صنعت وماذا ركبت وعنفته تعنيفا شديدا قالوا وقد بلغ يزيد أن ابن الزبير يقول فى خطبته يزيد القرود شارب الخمور تارك الصلوات منعكف على القينات
Translation: When Yazid wrote to Ibn Ziyad that he should go to Makkah and besiege Abdullah Ibn Zubayr (RA) he refused to do so and said: By Allah I will not combine two things for a Fasiq (i.e. Yazid). I have already killed the son of Prophet (salallaho alaihi wasalam)’s daughter (on his order) and now (he asks me to) wage war on Bayt ul Harram? However when he martyred Imam Hussain (RA) his mother Marjana said to him: May you die! what have you done and what crime have you committed, she also scolded him severely. Yazid was informed that Abdullah Ibn Zubayr (RA) used to say in his speeches that Yazid was a fraud, drunkard, one who abandons Salaat and one who stays with singing women. [Al-Bidayah Wal Nihayah, Volume 8, Page No 279]
Ibn Jauzi's comments on Yazeed 'the drunkard'
Ibn Jauzi in Wafa al-Wafa:
"Yazeed appointed his cousin Uthman bin Muhammad bin Abu Sufyan as Governor of Madina. He sent a delegation to visit Yazeed who bore gifts so that they might take the oath of allegiance to him. Upon their return they said 'We have returned having visited a man who has no religion, he drinks, plays instruments, keeps the company of singers and dogs [civil word for bestiality], we declare that we have broken our allegiance to him. Abdullah bin Abi Umro bin Hafs Mukhzumee commented 'Yazeed gave me gifts. But the reality is this man is an enemy of Allah (swt) and a drunkard. I shall separate myself from him in the same way that I remove my turban [from my head]."
May Allah curse who ever loves yaziid عليه لعنة الله
Your speech and leis make me sure now Shia is the right and it’s great that I’m Shia
Shia, give me evidence where shia is and what Prophet SAW told in hadeeth. Give me concrete evidence.
Aisha 🤮🍼
@@deem379412th imam still hiding you bastard 😂
@@khaan_pakhtoon363 Funny, I'm completely external to this conversation, but I've read a lot about the subject, and I always see this comment in Sunni/Shia arguments. The flip side of your question is, where is the concrete evidence of Muhammad mentioning Ahlu Sunna wa Jama'ah (idk if I spelled that right)? What your question have to do with anything?
It was a peace treaty between hassan and mawiya , the fact the imam did not fight on this occasion isnt a bayah. End of.
The propehts themselves chose when and not to fight. Hassan said if i had but 40 followrers i wouldve fought you. Praising those who killed hussain who is apart of rasululah saw im sure is haq...
Simple is that
There is not a single sahih narration Hussain didn't said a single word against yazeed in is whole life. So what are we looking for ??
Those who call them hussini should follow Hussain.
Hussain (as) not giving bayat to Yazid is clear indication about what he thought about Yazid. Read Wakia Harra
that man ur defending .. his army killed the leaders of youth of jannah killed his family and did nothing to stop or punish the killers .. btw idiot what positive things did any of the Ahlul bayt say about Yazeed ? and Hussain rA did not give biah to that filth
@@sheikhmd.salman9692 and so does Abdullah ibn Zubair,but does that make Abdul Malik Ibn Marwan as an illegitimate ruler? might as well take the Entire Marwanid Dynasty as an illegitimate ruler including Umar Ibn Abdul Aziz then.. Bruh
@@teukufadel8293 Umar ibn Abdul Aziz(ra) never wanted to rule anyway. Legitimate or illegitimate is not the topic of discussion rather which rule was ISLAMIC and which rule was UNISLAMIC. Umar ibn Abdul Aziz was a ruler of Islamic caliphate just like Khulafaye Rashidin and the others such Yazid was NOT. If you want to name someone as Yazid as legitimate Islamic caliph on whose order Ka'ba was burned and Madinah was sacked then that's between you and Allah.
Lies lies and love for ahle baet's killers.
Who was more beloved on this earth to the prophet than his Grandchildren ? Maybe his daughter ? How dear where Hassan & Hussain to their mother ? These people are produced through the Prophet , they are from him and part of him , why & how do you justify things for this son of a lady who didn’t believe in the prophet , this person is not even a Sahaba, yet his army killed the progeny and the most beloved people to the prophet , they took his head off and brought it to Yazid who didn’t punish the killers , then he carried on and attacked Madina taking right hand posses women from the progeny of Sahaba ( war of Al Harra ) and yet some schools of thought sought to justify things for this man, wow it amazes me that someone who the buck stops at wiped out the progeny of the greatest beloved man that ever lived and you find room in your hearts to defend him, scholars should hang their heads in shame
I am sunni but you are so biased on this and ignoring incident harra what he did to kaaba and much more.
listen to Engineer Ali Mirza about Muawiyah and Yajeed. How can you defend both of them? Killing Hussain or not punishing his killer is equally sinful. how can anyone justify this?
Engineer is a fool😂😂😂😂,He is not A'lim ,and he didn't read all books
I didn't knew you were nasabi shiekh!! You are saying Yazeed was a great leader May Allah reseruct us With Husain and ahlulbait.
i loved u but here you disappointed me bukhari muslim proves that who were right and who were wrong clearly
Its odd you ask Allah to be pleased with him, even though he (Mauwiyya) was a fasik. Allah commands 'tabarra':
My Lord! Forgive me, my parents, and whoever enters my house in faith, and ˹all˺ believing men and women. And increase the oppressors only in destruction.”(sura Nuh. 71:28)