Hi, everyone! So, how was it this time? 1:07 The duration of a flight to the Moon implies the overall time of the Artemis mission, which is going to take around 30 days. Out of these, a flight to the Moon is going to take about 3 days. If you are a fan of our videos, feel free to support our project here: ➥ Support us on UA-cam - www.youtube.com/@kosmo_off/join ➥ Support us on Patreon - www.patreon.com/kosmo_off
How did the reachers exclude the 'van der Waals - forces" between the two gold leave plates ? This has always bothered me and so far i never had a definatif anwser. Grtzz from the Netherlands Johny geerts
Idk you kind lost me when your video title showcases this as something doable, but within a minute or so you begin with "let's see hypotheically how" The rest just becomes nonsense no matter how cool or appealing it might sound. It's just click bait at that point and that's not very cool
Inspirational video Kosmo, who knows what we will achieve in Space technology in the next few decades, I think it's time to step away from chemical based prepulsion and start moving forward.
Awesome video ! I also didn’t realize that I wasn’t getting all your notifications because of that post you just recently stated about this video not getting in the recommendations 😊 Thanks for putting the time and effort into these videos
Woow so much awesome content in an eleven min video! And the quality of the animations are most impressive, thank you so much for making such beautiful, inspiring and informative videos
It takes about 3 days for a spacecraft to reach the Moon. During that time a spacecraft travels at least 240,000 miles (386,400 kilometers) which is the distance between Earth and the Moon. The specific distance depends on the specific path chosen. Please correct your statement.
How did the reachers exclude the 'van der Waals - forces" between the two gold leave plates ? This has always bothered me and so far i never had a definatif anwser. Grtzz from the Netherlands Johny geerts
94 stars are in reach within 20 light years, i find that alongside advancement of space travel very very very exciting! and projects that are undergoing like spacex with starship to colonize mars are first true steps in the direction of human space travel in my opinion (:
Humans may never reach the stars…however we don’t have to, because our robots certainly will. An Alcubierre Drive may not be feasible for transporting something the size of a starship capable of carrying us, but one capable of transport nano bots will surely be within our reach at some point in the future. 💫🙏🍻
I think technology similar to "slipspace" in the Halo games is our best best for long distance space travel. But we need a space elevator way before that.
It is good to have enthusiasm for space content, and I enjoy watching more space content, but there are several science/tech issues with this video. The Casimir effect producing free energy seems to be unsubstantiated and if it does produce energy, it is going to be tiny tiny amounts compared to the mass of the power plant. The "thrust to weight" ratio will be abysmal. The video goes from maybe we can produce nanowatts of power with this to it can produce as much power as the entire earth converted into energy. There's a huge scale problem that is handwaved away. The second big problem I have is the warp drive. It doesn't work and is just bad science. Mathematically a warp field could be generated and it is a fun thought experiment so long as it remains just that. But trying to apply it to the real world runs into a laundry list of problems. The biggest one for me is the horizon problem. If the ship is warping space time in front of itself, it has to communicate information into the space ahead of it to cause that space to warp. That space isn't already warped, so it is in the normal universe. That means any information sent, any "cause" which generates an "effect" has to travel through normal space, which is limited to the speed of light. Therefore the warp drive can't go faster than the speed of light because it can't force the unaltered space in front of it to warp any faster than the light/energy it sends ahead of itself to force a warp to occur. I think it is mildly dangerous, or at least dishonest to peddle pseudoscience like this without a big disclaimer that it is all very unproven and has a lot of legitimate criticism and detractors. I don't mean to imply Kosmo is any more guilty of this than the rest of space communicators, and I mean no ill will here, I just want to see scientific communicators do better. Getting people's hopes up over science that just flat out can never work isn't doing anyone any good. I understand the excitement to talk about these things and the hope that it will work, but it just isn't founded on science, and we all need to be better about due diligence on claims like these.
My hope is on that new science that is so revolutionair , cheap and safe that it will not only change the way we travel , but it could influence big parts of our everyday life. Yeah , this steam thing could really be a big leap Forward.
Sorry, but your wohle assumption about the Casimir-Effect is completely wrong. What you describe is a perpetuum mobile and that's simply impossible. Yes, you could harvest energy from the two plates moving together, but you would need the same amount of energy for dividing them again. It's the same as with water in a high reservoir: You could use it's potential energy to power a turbine to generate electricity, but you would need the same amount of energy to pump the water back up (energy losses aside).
@@burningoceanfloor1560 Thats the basic gist, due to conservation of energy we cannot simple create something out of nothing and due to E=MC² from Einstein energy's mass relation to accelerate a mass we would need large amount of energy/infinite energy and its not possible to create energy again, hence the conclusion
People seem to not understand how space travel works. It’s not like Star Wars, you don’t just fly around turning and stuff. You rely on gravity and orbit.
Surprised to see a new video include the theoretical Casimir effect, which to my understanding has been pretty well debunked at this point by modern physics.
Since we are talking about ships that can travel to the edge of the universe, can you make a video on ships or structures meant to colonize billions of people? Like Dyson spheres or Ring worlds. Inspiration was taken from Isaac Arthur from his youtube channel SFIA.
This won't happen in the next several hundred years...if ever. I guarantee it. We aren't even close on self driving cars. Lots of Bravo Sierra in an eleven minute video.
The Oort Cloud is the most distant region of our solar system. Even the nearest objects in the Oort Cloud are thought to be many times farther from the Sun than the outer reaches of the Kuiper Belt. It is not hypothectical, according to NASA. Please correct that error.
Nice one. The idea that occurred to me was a controlled vibration chamber, not dissimilar to that which you describe. But I had these thoughts 22 years ago. Ho hu. Thankyou for caring and sharing. 😀
How many times have fictional space travelers come upon unexpected astronomical objects, or referenced the necessity of having very accurate charts prior to warping / hyperjumping? Hopefully such a necessity will keep pace with engine and energy developments.
Traveling through linear space is DOA. Going forward by spitting matter or energy out the rear is old thinking. If we learn to manipulate gravity and distort spacetime at our will by harnessing the effect witnessed by gravitational lensing, we can literally bend spacetime and travel great distances without dealing with traveling in a linear mode through space.
Since the moon’s craters are filled with electrons and protons, could we make something that can intake the electrical energy the sun expels? Or do I need to lay off the beers?
For some reason people don't know about the 1 realistic method for interstellar travel. If a ship travels at a constant 1 g acceleration rate it would get to Alpha Centauri in just 3.6 ship/7.3 Earth years (and this includes turning the ship around halfway to decelerate) and It would have gravity the whole way. The ship would achieve about .95% light speed after about 1 year. A 10 ton ship would need a mere 10 tons of continuous thrust. All that is needed for this is a fission rocket that can put out thrust for long periods and does not consume hydrogen or xenon (you can't bring 500 tons of that with you). Both uranium and plutonium are jittery atoms that are on the verge of fissioning all by themselves, there should be a way to get them to fission in a linear fashion. What's needed is a controlled, time released nuclear explosion. Typically fission occurs when a neutron hits a uranium or plutonium atom. This is because they will not tolerate an increase in mass. Due to the equivalence of mass and energy, the same should be true if you infuse a uranium or plutonium atom with energy. This could potentially be done by having positively charged atoms coming into contact with negatively charged atoms. Or potentially having a powerful laser hitting uranium or plutonium. With the constant 1 g acceleration method a ship can span the entire diameter of our galaxy in 24 ship/113,000 Earth years. Systems with stars similar to our sun can be reached in under 10 years.
@@shawns0762 slower for what. Only massless particles can travel at the speed of light. Have you reduced the ships mass? Where are the studies that prove biological systems are affected by motion.
It's going to take a couple of weeks to get to the moon? Why is that? Didn't it take Apollo 4 days to get there? So why is it taking a couple of weeks these days?
For those who doubt that we will visit other star systems, i highly implore you to take a look at a video on nuclear saltwater rockets, by scott manley. I was also in the camp of "i'll believe it when i see sufficient evidence" category, but after learning about plasma and nuclear propulsion, i cannot help but be optimistic about the future of space travel... Literally as soon as we decide to fly a nuclear reactor up into space with more than a few hundred kW of power, a plethora of new opportunities open up. All you need is a portable energy source, and some imagination ;)
Hi, everyone! So, how was it this time?
1:07 The duration of a flight to the Moon implies the overall time of the Artemis mission, which is going to take around 30 days. Out of these, a flight to the Moon is going to take about 3 days.
If you are a fan of our videos, feel free to support our project here:
➥ Support us on UA-cam - www.youtube.com/@kosmo_off/join
➥ Support us on Patreon - www.patreon.com/kosmo_off
How did the reachers exclude the 'van der Waals - forces" between the two gold leave plates ?
This has always bothered me and so far i never had a definatif anwser.
Grtzz from the Netherlands Johny geerts
A journey to the moon will take several weeks? It took the Apollo mission 3 days and that was 60 years ago
Idk you kind lost me when your video title showcases this as something doable, but within a minute or so you begin with "let's see hypotheically how"
The rest just becomes nonsense no matter how cool or appealing it might sound. It's just click bait at that point and that's not very cool
@@MagnusQuake not very cool at all dude
@@MagnusQuake oh just fucking relax lol how is it clickbait if the already have proven by the Hong Kong and American team?
The fact that I understand this as a regular person, while watching the best visuals ever in mind bogging of it's own. Thank you
They do such a great job communicating complex science stuff to non-scientists like me.
Not the best visuals ever, check out @Melodysheep.
@@Kun..07overrated
Am quite surprised the quality of the video is excellent well done fellow humanperson
Kosmo is the best, if not one of the best, space/ interstellar channels on youtube.
Produced by a.i. bots..... lol
Didn't see that twist coming...... did ya?
The visuals, the details, the voice... pure Bliss! Thank you for your hard work 😊
finally a new kosmo video! this is my favorite space channel i just wish they could upload more :< true quality videos.
What a fantastic time to be alive!
What being on the verge of the USA taking us towards nuclear war? 😆
@Josh Smith Well it certainly isn’t Russia is it? Unless you watch western media spinning it as though Russia is.
I love these theoretical physics concepts that use applied physics. Great job keep it up 👍
thata happen . but the scientist didn't know how to stop the starship from buble wrap
This channel is a gem, I hope it stays the same when it grows more popular
Unstamding video. Great work by the production team!
Inspirational video Kosmo, who knows what we will achieve in Space technology in the next few decades, I think it's time to step away from chemical based prepulsion and start moving forward.
Awesome video ! I also didn’t realize that I wasn’t getting all your notifications because of that post you just recently stated about this video not getting in the recommendations 😊
Thanks for putting the time and effort into these videos
Excellent video!
Great video thanks
Woow so much awesome content in an eleven min video! And the quality of the animations are most impressive, thank you so much for making such beautiful, inspiring and informative videos
Very interesting!
I always enjoy your videos.
I love Astronomy, it outta this world.
Keep up the good work. 😎👍
I can't believe i found a channel called just "Kosmo" ^,^ im have to be subscribed to this
🤯 🚀
Its a dream of mine to see this technology! 👀
A journey to the moon will take weeks.? I'm sorry did you misspeak? Love your channel! Cheers.
a few days at best, could have been worse.
For some reason I don’t get notifications and it don’t show up in my feed. Keep up the great work.
When I saw the ship all I heard was "Carrier arrived". Damn Protoss, we still love you.
I love this channel!
@Kosmo >>> 👍👍
It takes about 3 days for a spacecraft to reach the Moon. During that time a spacecraft travels at least 240,000 miles (386,400 kilometers) which is the distance between Earth and the Moon. The specific distance depends on the specific path chosen. Please correct your statement.
watching in 2250.. they had the right hints...just needed to understand a few more things
very well made
How did the reachers exclude the 'van der Waals - forces" between the two gold leave plates ?
This has always bothered me and so far i never had a definatif anwser.
Grtzz from the Netherlands Johny geerts
We need an almost to completely inexhaustible source of energy not to mention a relatively inexpensive one as well.
Thats some quality scifi!
Great video 👍👍
keep thinkin y’all a picture channel, thanks for reminder
_"If God intended man to fly, He'd have given us tickets!"_ - Monty Python's Flying Circus
94 stars are in reach within 20 light years, i find that alongside advancement of space travel very very very exciting! and projects that are undergoing like spacex with starship to colonize mars are first true steps in the direction of human space travel in my opinion (:
Woah🔥
we all need to start working together and stop waging war before we can have a star trek future.
I liked it 👍
I like that 😁👍👍
Humans may never reach the stars…however we don’t have to, because our robots certainly will. An Alcubierre Drive may not be feasible for transporting something the size of a starship capable of carrying us, but one capable of transport nano bots will surely be within our reach at some point in the future.
💫🙏🍻
Hilium 3 star ship
It is impossible to create the bubble itself from inside, in it's center point from the ship.
My Datsun can take you there.
Amazing
KOSMO! I'm curious to know, where are you from? Your accent is soothing and listenable
Such an interesting and intelligent things
.......Reaching the Edge of the Known Universe.....
Fair winds and following seas to all.
Nice 😊👍
Privet iz Rossii как вам байден?)))
Cool!
I think technology similar to "slipspace" in the Halo games is our best best for long distance space travel. But we need a space elevator way before that.
Oh I'm praying for these concepts to be a reality one day 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼... maybe 1-2 hundred years from now??
..
It is good to have enthusiasm for space content, and I enjoy watching more space content, but there are several science/tech issues with this video. The Casimir effect producing free energy seems to be unsubstantiated and if it does produce energy, it is going to be tiny tiny amounts compared to the mass of the power plant. The "thrust to weight" ratio will be abysmal. The video goes from maybe we can produce nanowatts of power with this to it can produce as much power as the entire earth converted into energy. There's a huge scale problem that is handwaved away.
The second big problem I have is the warp drive. It doesn't work and is just bad science. Mathematically a warp field could be generated and it is a fun thought experiment so long as it remains just that. But trying to apply it to the real world runs into a laundry list of problems. The biggest one for me is the horizon problem. If the ship is warping space time in front of itself, it has to communicate information into the space ahead of it to cause that space to warp. That space isn't already warped, so it is in the normal universe. That means any information sent, any "cause" which generates an "effect" has to travel through normal space, which is limited to the speed of light. Therefore the warp drive can't go faster than the speed of light because it can't force the unaltered space in front of it to warp any faster than the light/energy it sends ahead of itself to force a warp to occur.
I think it is mildly dangerous, or at least dishonest to peddle pseudoscience like this without a big disclaimer that it is all very unproven and has a lot of legitimate criticism and detractors. I don't mean to imply Kosmo is any more guilty of this than the rest of space communicators, and I mean no ill will here, I just want to see scientific communicators do better. Getting people's hopes up over science that just flat out can never work isn't doing anyone any good. I understand the excitement to talk about these things and the hope that it will work, but it just isn't founded on science, and we all need to be better about due diligence on claims like these.
Good video
If we ever meet an alien civilization, it'll likely take place between 2 machines and may take more than 100,000 years for the news to reach us.
I hear there is a really good restaurant out there.
My hope is on that new science that is so revolutionair , cheap and safe that it will not only change the way we travel , but it could influence big parts of our everyday life.
Yeah , this steam thing could really be a big leap Forward.
..
At night running to the head from my bed I'm faster than light!!!!
Interstellar travel is imminent in 500 years...
Sorry, but your wohle assumption about the Casimir-Effect is completely wrong.
What you describe is a perpetuum mobile and that's simply impossible.
Yes, you could harvest energy from the two plates moving together, but you would need the same amount of energy for dividing them again.
It's the same as with water in a high reservoir: You could use it's potential energy to power a turbine to generate electricity, but you would need the same amount of energy to pump the water back up (energy losses aside).
Infinite energy is simply impossible... and as for hyper drive there are still some drawback leaving the energy requirement aside.
Then you shall never reach it
@@burningoceanfloor1560 Thats the basic gist, due to conservation of energy we cannot simple create something out of nothing and due to E=MC² from Einstein energy's mass relation to accelerate a mass we would need large amount of energy/infinite energy and its not possible to create energy again, hence the conclusion
"Infinite energy is simply impossible..." - Famous last words. 👁️ 👁️
who said it? Not me as im still alife😅😅
People seem to not understand how space travel works. It’s not like Star Wars, you don’t just fly around turning and stuff. You rely on gravity and orbit.
Also, RTGs are radioistope *thermoelectric* generators, mistake at 3:00
Surprised to see a new video include the theoretical Casimir effect, which to my understanding has been pretty well debunked at this point by modern physics.
First...if I believed in time as a construct.
Reality is not based upon belief and the passage of time is inevitable because of entropy. Sorry.
Constructs are still based off of reality, but if you extrapolate too much from them, then the construct becomes too restrictive and even false.
this isn't smoke and chill type of Cosmo
30 days to the moon?!? Bwha-ha-ha....
It hasn't taken that long - EVER...
Very interesting but it doesn't take weeks to get to the moon, Apollo missions took only days.
reminds me of the ship of the imagination
Space fantasy
wow!
Good trick.
The universe doesn't have edges.
I want to see every movie. That your amazing video clips please comment movie you notice from this video
We cant even do sample return from mars yet
The casimir effect doesn't produce any power. It's like trying to extract energy from a spring.
Since we are talking about ships that can travel to the edge of the universe, can you make a video on ships or structures meant to colonize billions of people? Like Dyson spheres or Ring worlds. Inspiration was taken from Isaac Arthur from his youtube channel SFIA.
This won't happen in the next several hundred years...if ever. I guarantee it. We aren't even close on self driving cars. Lots of Bravo Sierra in an eleven minute video.
Time for ai to solve the faster than light problem. They dont feel pity or remorse, dont sleep, get ill or need to feed and will not stop, ever
The Oort Cloud is the most distant region of our solar system. Even the nearest objects in the Oort Cloud are thought to be many times farther from the Sun than the outer reaches of the Kuiper Belt. It is not hypothectical, according to NASA. Please correct that error.
Nice one.
The idea that occurred to me was a controlled vibration chamber, not dissimilar to that which you describe. But I had these thoughts 22 years ago.
Ho hu.
Thankyou for caring and sharing. 😀
Didnt hear ya say kosmo @ intro
Even if faster than light travel was ever achieved, then is the dilemma of the effects of it on the human body
Once you get up to speed, you can shut the engine off/
How many times have fictional space travelers come upon unexpected astronomical objects, or referenced the necessity of having very accurate charts prior to warping / hyperjumping? Hopefully such a necessity will keep pace with engine and energy developments.
Traveling through linear space is DOA. Going forward by spitting matter or energy out the rear is old thinking. If we learn to manipulate gravity and distort spacetime at our will by harnessing the effect witnessed by gravitational lensing, we can literally bend spacetime and travel great distances without dealing with traveling in a linear mode through space.
Alcubierre drive?
Harnessing light. Which has no mass.
Using it for mass purposes guessing in the universe 3 over from us.
"There is no spoon"
So scientists have created the basis of a ZPM from Stargate, crazy.
faster Rockets 🚀 🚀 🚀
🚀
Since the moon’s craters are filled with electrons and protons, could we make something that can intake the electrical energy the sun expels? Or do I need to lay off the beers?
For some reason people don't know about the 1 realistic method for interstellar travel. If a ship travels at a constant 1 g acceleration rate it would get to Alpha Centauri in just 3.6 ship/7.3 Earth years (and this includes turning the ship around halfway to decelerate) and It would have gravity the whole way. The ship would achieve about .95% light speed after about 1 year. A 10 ton ship would need a mere 10 tons of continuous thrust.
All that is needed for this is a fission rocket that can put out thrust for long periods and does not consume hydrogen or xenon (you can't bring 500 tons of that with you).
Both uranium and plutonium are jittery atoms that are on the verge of fissioning all by themselves, there should be a way to get them to fission in a linear fashion. What's needed is a controlled, time released nuclear explosion.
Typically fission occurs when a neutron hits a uranium or plutonium atom. This is because they will not tolerate an increase in mass. Due to the equivalence of mass and energy, the same should be true if you infuse a uranium or plutonium atom with energy. This could potentially be done by having positively charged atoms coming into contact with negatively charged atoms. Or potentially having a powerful laser hitting uranium or plutonium.
With the constant 1 g acceleration method a ship can span the entire diameter of our galaxy in 24 ship/113,000 Earth years. Systems with stars similar to our sun can be reached in under 10 years.
Ship years are the same as earth years. No one has ever proved biological systems slow down with motion.
@@stewiesaidthat it's called relativity, look it up
@@shawns0762 it's called biology. Look it up. Motion does not affect biological processes.
@@stewiesaidthat when the ship approaches the speed of light time will be slower on Earth. It's not debatable
@@shawns0762 slower for what. Only massless particles can travel at the speed of light. Have you reduced the ships mass? Where are the studies that prove biological systems are affected by motion.
Generating energy out of nothing for interstellar travel is too optimistic, don't you think?
If we reallocated the trillions of dollars we use to create more complex ways to explode our fellow humans to space programs...
Sources?
shared....YT is garbage when it comes to supporting legit content oh, and i'm old school Sci-Fi so...Bussard Ram
journey to the moon will take several weeks? how come Apollo did it in three days? back in 1969?
For the algorithm
Nice quality video, but... "chemical jet engines"...?
We have learned how to control & use nuclear power, why not some other type of energy source that is much more powerful?
It's going to take a couple of weeks to get to the moon? Why is that? Didn't it take Apollo 4 days to get there? So why is it taking a couple of weeks these days?
You can get to the moon in three days, much less than two weeks.
Before I waste my time on this.... doesn't the universe expand faster than the speed of light?
Ain't nobody entering another sun system. .. alive at least. We can send bodies for other civilizations to study .
Wait a 100 years bro
@ONEPLAYER 20 Nyet. ...as in Russian for "nope"
@@thefirstsin I hope Lestat bites me soon .. or I might miss the party. ;-)
The closest star is 4.5 light years away. That’s reachable and it will be reached. Technology is on a speed train. Don’t be shallow.
For those who doubt that we will visit other star systems, i highly implore you to take a look at a video on nuclear saltwater rockets, by scott manley.
I was also in the camp of "i'll believe it when i see sufficient evidence" category, but after learning about plasma and nuclear propulsion, i cannot help but be optimistic about the future of space travel...
Literally as soon as we decide to fly a nuclear reactor up into space with more than a few hundred kW of power, a plethora of new opportunities open up. All you need is a portable energy source, and some imagination ;)
our only suitable spaceship is stuck in orbit around our sun and idiots are destroying it.