Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.

Adidas Boston 12 vs Hoka Mach X | Which Should I Choose?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 сер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 32

  • @i.p2088
    @i.p2088 Рік тому +7

    I have the Boston 12. Excellent for me once I don't let my cadance drop.. Even took them off road and they were very stable and comfortable. Usually I hate plated shoes on loose gravel because they are to stiff but the Boston 12 with the rods does a great job also on gravel and camber roads.

  • @johnnylineham59
    @johnnylineham59 8 місяців тому +8

    I've just got a pair of Mach X, only 1 run so far but they feel great to me, so many elements of your description don't really mesh with my first impressions, I wonder if later production versions are slightly different. Mine don't appear to be anywhere near as stiff as yours, and on foot the upper feels very similar to the Mach 5 in terms of fit, also medial heel stability feels very reassuring to me. I'm pretty happy with them and looking forward to plenty of more runs.

  • @Mumrik597
    @Mumrik597 Рік тому +3

    Hoka shoes seems to just work well for me. I bought the Mach X and so far I'm really pleased.

  • @justincarman3528
    @justincarman3528 Рік тому +3

    Please do a video of these two shoes plus the ASICS magic speed 3 !!! I think we could all benefit from that!!

  • @markuscg1
    @markuscg1 Рік тому +5

    When I tried the Boston 12s on, I found the midfoot was very narrow for me; I felt like my arch was collapsing medially off the shoe with no support at all. I sent them back. I don't have a wide foot, but my foot shape seems like it's almost the same width from heel to toe. I also have the Mach X. It's ok, but I find that I don't do well with any kind of plate in a shoe. The hunt for a daily trainer continues (I use the Topo Cyclone 2 for faster workouts, but didn't like the fit of the Phantom).

    • @kevinclark5086
      @kevinclark5086 11 місяців тому

      Asics Superblast sounds like it's made for you.

  • @Dave-kq9cv
    @Dave-kq9cv Рік тому +4

    Love my Boston 12, they are good at slow pace but they really shine at faster paces and they fit my slightly wider foot. I don’t think the Hoka would fit me.

    • @lorenzoquirante8685
      @lorenzoquirante8685 Рік тому

      I don’t know how your foot compares to mine but I demoed the Mach x and a half size up worked fine :)

  • @feifeskufus
    @feifeskufus 2 місяці тому

    Impressive one-take!

  • @Simo.PT.
    @Simo.PT. Рік тому +2

    Hi. Very informative video as always. So the Mach x have very few of the Mach 4-5' s ride feel ? Never Heard of this much stifness in other review

  • @elliotendures
    @elliotendures Рік тому

    Still looking for Goldilocks. A stable neutral performance shoe with good traction for running in the rain. Think Superblast with a Ghost outsole.

    • @joshgonzalez2885
      @joshgonzalez2885 11 місяців тому

      What about NB 880 v13? That’s what most people describe it as

  • @jonathansuparta3194
    @jonathansuparta3194 8 місяців тому

    i bought both of it, so didnt need to choose :)

  • @claudiosimon8169
    @claudiosimon8169 Рік тому +2

    Great comparison. Tks. I would also like to see a comparison between Boston 12 and puma deviate nitro 2. Have you thought about that? I think they fall into the same category, do you agree? Tks

    • @joandomar1
      @joandomar1 2 місяці тому

      Si,hay una comparativa y el Puma es más lento comparado con Boston 12.

  • @nollys8523
    @nollys8523 Рік тому +3

    I tried the Mach X, didn’t like them but then I didn’t like the Mach 4, so I’m guessing the Mach line doesn’t work for me.
    Looking to upgrade my Boston 10 so the 12 might be the better choice for me.

  • @jacobmyers4641
    @jacobmyers4641 Рік тому

    How is the durability of the Boston? I tend to wear the rubber off on the posterolateral side really fast so I’ve been trying to a shoe I can run 400+ miles in without wearing through the midsole.

  • @azn5k
    @azn5k Рік тому +1

    boston 12 was a big let down for me. I really wanted to like them, but unfortunately they just didn't hit.
    - found it hard to get a good lock down.
    - sizing is off. i'm always a US10 in everything, but in my boston 12, I had far too much room in the forefoot and heel.
    - heel area feels heavy. I have to adapt my usual forefoot strike to more midfoot for me to feel 'comfortable' running.
    sad...

  • @ondamixtape
    @ondamixtape 7 місяців тому

    Mach x are better for daily training for me

  • @escape2064
    @escape2064 Рік тому

    hi matt 💕💕

  • @eykinhuang2076
    @eykinhuang2076 Рік тому +2

    mach x definitely overprice compare to boston 12

  • @grey_fox7
    @grey_fox7 Рік тому

    Which would you say is a more stable shoe, Boston 12 or Adios Pro 3?

    • @DoctorsofRunning
      @DoctorsofRunning  Рік тому +2

      Adios pro 3 by far due to the increase rod stiffness and better sole flaring

    • @grey_fox7
      @grey_fox7 Рік тому

      @@DoctorsofRunning thank you!

  • @budikuesal7722
    @budikuesal7722 Рік тому

    I tried the Boston 12 in store and I found that the lateral side of the heel was not level with the medial side (lateral side was not touching the ground), making it I guess not very stable at the heel.. Is it safe for a heel striker? All my shoes have significant wear on those lateral heel sides.. thanks

    • @DoctorsofRunning
      @DoctorsofRunning  Рік тому

      Lateral heel bevels are usually pretty good actually. The midsole itself is a bit unstable and through the midfoot which is it’s own thing, but a lateral heel bevel is our preferred often. When the bevel is medial or centered, it causes more issues.

    • @budikuesal7722
      @budikuesal7722 Рік тому

      @@DoctorsofRunning so lateral heel bevels are actually safe for heel striker?

  • @geert574
    @geert574 Рік тому +3

    no brainer, Hoka is junk

  • @droy333
    @droy333 Рік тому

    Adidas is german, Ad-di-das not so much A-dee-dis