Doing the DTU coursera wind energy certificate and this helped a lot to understand the aerodynamics module. This simulation model is amazing. Thank you!
That's great to hear, please tell your friends, and your teachers! And you can try Ashes for yourself for 2 weeks by downloading it for free form www.simis.io
Hi I have a question. So according to your extremely well presented explanation, the rotational velocity of the wind is the main cause of the rotation of the blades because it is the one that induces Ftotal. (Mostly using Flift). The Ftotal causes Ftorque that rotates the blades. However, suppose the blades are not rotating at all and the wind starts to blow. How does the wind turbine even start rotating from a complete stop? Are there different forces at work during the startup?
Good question! The main contributor to the relative velocity is, as you said, the rotational velocity, but the incoming wind velocity also contributes. When the turbine is not rotating, only the incoming wind velocity will produce aerodynamic loads. These loads will be much smaller than when the turbine is in operation (i.e. rotating), but strong enough to start rotating the turbine. So the turbine will start rotating very slowly, which will produce a very small rotational velocity, which will increase the aerodynamic loads, which will make the turbine rotate a bit faster, which will increase the rotational velocity and so on. But the best way to understand this would be to use the free trial period of Ashes and try to do it yourself (you could try to do something similar to our video, with an initial rotational velocity of 0 RPM). You can get the software at www.simis.io, and please let us know if it worked!
Haha if there was a million 'love comment' button I'd click that one! Great that you liked it, you should download Ashes (www.simis.io) and try the velocity triangle yourself!
@@AshesWindTurbineSimulation I really appreciate your explanation, it help me alot , Do you have facebook or whatsapp , I am doing my final project of graduation, and it's about savinous wind turbine and need some point to be explained , thank you bro for everything you've done so far in your channel 😊🌹
@@ibrahimhamoud15 Wr're not experts in vertical axis, but you could try asking in our forum, and we'll see if we can answer. Here's the link: www.simis.io/q-and-a/
Very nice explanation. And interesting to see the thrust force, which comes with a lot of consequence, and unfortunately the lift force is not increasing over distance. That would really create a lot of torque. What is your idea of a variable pitching VAWT, like we demonstrate in our channel?
Sorry for late reply. We haven't looked at VAWTs at all, but are vey interested to do that in the future. Looking for the right context/project that will put VAWT loading to the top our our (very long) priority list (aka Trello boards). About thrust - I think it's fascinating that you cannot get rid of it by improving design - it's a consequence of first principles.
Great video! Are you able to quantify how much larger the thrust force is than the torque, are the visual lengths true? To me the difference between the two appears to be too large, given that Betz' law in an impossibly ideal turbine would limit the difference to 59.3%/(1-59.3%)-1 = 45.7% (i.e. the energy left in the wind passing the turbine could be at minimum 45.7% larger than what's converted to electricity).
The visual lengths are proportional, but we don't recommend using them for numerical values. Instead, use sensors that give you live numerical values (that can be exported) and live graphs if you want that. For example, there is a sensor field for efficiency, ie mechanical power (torque * rotational speed) divided by incoming power in the wind. For a well designed wind turbine the max value is around 50% < Betz limit of 59%. I don't think understand your reasoning about efficiency/Betz. Seems like you don't take the rotational velocity into account? To get power, that is necessary. Please, elaborate, or better yet - try ASHES with the 2 w evaluation license and look at sensors, and then elaborate. Or are you studying wind turbines at university, and already using ASHES in class?
We have a benchmarking framework where we run tests and compare results with other software, full-scale data, experimental data and results from previous versions of Ashes. We add new tests on a daily or weekly basis, every time we want to test something new (for example when there is a new feature). By running the tests every night we make sure that the results are always up to date. The tests are run every night and published every new release (see www.simis.io/docs/validation-benchmarks-latest-reports for the latest reports). We think it is crucial that the tests are public and fully reproducible, so all the data needed to run the tests yourself are available as well. This video explains how to understand and reproduce the tests: ua-cam.com/video/GkoBcUybSos/v-deo.html And this blog post gives more details about how the whole thing works: www.simis.io/pages/blog/
thanks, excellent explanation, have you any video about flat blade turbines? since such a airfoil profile is not possible for small home made ones, but if you help we can diy better small turbines, 🙏🙏🙏
Thank you for your video. Is it possible to have a negative pitch angle in the low wind speed region? what effect does this create on the WT performance?
Generally, for low wind speeds, the controller will make the rotor rotate at a speed that will provide the optimal tip speed ratio (the ratio of the blade tip velocity over the wind speed). This is done so that the angle of attack is the best one in terms of lift to drag ratio. So a low wind speed will generally not produce a negative angle of attack
I am wondering how the pitch plays a role in this velocity triangle. Does increasing pitch always lead to an decrease in power or are there instances where increasing pitch actually ends up increasing power. Would this not depend on the turbine regimes? Another question about the ASHES software, I was browsing through the documentation but did not find anything related to user defined wind functions, I know you can but I am not sure how. I want to model wind velocities that are different from the logarithmic wind law
Great question. The way the controller works for commercial wind turbines is that for low wind speeds (under the rated wind speed) it tries to keep the rotational speed of the rotor such that the angle between the airfoil and the total wind is optimal. So in that context, any pitching of the blades would move you away from the optimal point and thus decrease the power. But you could design and mount the blade so that it is not operating at the optimal angle of attack, and then pitch the blades when you want that to happen. About the wind speed, what type of wind are you trying to model?
@@yashdagade1240 Low-level jet winds can be generated with TurbSim, which is included in Ashes. You will have to use the Turbulent wind creator for that (see www.simis.io/docs/user-manual-turbulent-wind-creator) and select te relevant parameters
Thanks for the comment - We are happy you found it useful. You can play around with the velocity triangle yourself during the 2 weeks evaluation of Ashes. Register and download the full version from simis.io.
XFoil comes with the software, so you could generate different polars for your airfoils for different surface roughnesses and then compare how they perform
Yes, it can simulate VAWT as well. We don't offer free versions, but reduced academic licenses. Contact us to discuss options (www.simis.io/pages/contact/)
Well, not really... The concept of the velocity triangle does apply, but since Savonius wind turbines are vertical axis turbines, things would look quite different
Certainly! You can change the yaw angle under Analysis parameters-> Initial conditions. I suggest you post your question on our forum (www.simis.io/q-and-a/) so we can answer more in detail.
Glad you liked it! The rotor plane is a plane that is perpendicular to the main shaft and goes through the hub. So if the cone angle was 0, all blades would be in the rotor plane. There is an illustration of the rotor plane in our theory manual, here: www.simis.io/help/#52d585d6f04f4e8e8fc587730bc4213d
How can you sum up absolute velocity (wind speed) and rotational velocity to get the relative velocity? Wasn't it always u+w=v? What I want to say is that "u" should be turned the other way around
Hi Jesus The rotational velocity is the apparent velocity 'felt' by the blade element as it moves through the air, so it is in the opposite direction of the motion of the element (and correctly drawn in this animation). But maybe we have different definitions of rotational velocity?
Hi Satish We have removed the floating module in the current version, but it will be available in a few weeks again. If you send us an email with your details at support@simis.io, we can keep you updated
The angle of attack is noted 'alpha' in the video, in the velocity triangle window. You can see it in the Blade station sensor also. For more info, check our manual here www.simis.io/help/#12b215b5ed3c45109db85b64c854876a
essential questions remain unanswered: why does one accept such huge thrust-forces with relatively little torque? it is torque you want in the end... so why does one not turn the airfoil more parallel to the wind direction? that would turn its liftforce more into the right direction (ideally parallel to the rotational plane). ok, this would increase drag, but you said it's very small. so why not accept some increase in drag in exchange for more torque and less useless, even counterproductive thrust?! secondly it remains entirely unclear why the wings of a modern windmill are so long and slender and why they taper towards the end, leaving a lot of wind(-force) unused that can pass through the rotation plane without meeting a blade...? intuitively one would broaden the wing towards the outer edge and incline it at an angle of something like 45 degrees to the wind direction, so that more wind is 'caught' and more torque is generated by turning the lift force towards the rotational plane? could you please answer these questions (without maths!) just using the visual force vectors and/or ideally experiments? thanx a lot!
Those are indeed excellent questions. Unfortunately we don’t have the capacity to prioritise making new videos at the moment, but I’ll try to reply here:
About rotating the airfoil: the direction of the lift (and the drag) is defined by the direction of the relative wind: the lift is perpendicular to the relative wind, and the drag is parallel. So if you rotated the airfoil (in any direction), you would not change the direction of the lift (because the relative wind would not change (at least initially, but let’s keep that for another time)). In the conditions shown in the video, the angle between the airfoil and the incoming wind is optimised to get the best lift-over-drag ratio. If we had more drag, the torque would be reduced and we would be producing less energy. If you have the time, you should definitely try this with Ashes, it would be very obvious if you tried to reproduce the velocity triangle and pitch the blades!
About modifying the blade towards the tip: at the tip, the relative wind is almost parallel to the rotor plane (and thus perpendicular to the wind velocity), so if you pitched the blade 45 degrees you will actually drastically increase the drag, again, not what you want. And you are totally right that broadening the airfoils towards the tip would increase power production, but then you would have to reinforce the rest of the blade a lot for it to handle the deflections due to the increased aerodynamic forces and weight. There would also be an issue with the torque distribution along the blade: with the way blades are currently designed, it is more or less homogeneous, but with your suggestion you would have much larger forces at the tip, which would increase shear stresses within the blade. So even though your suggestion makes a lot of sense from an aerodynamical point of view, there are structural reasons that make it more economical to have slender blades.
@@AshesWindTurbineSimulation hello, one thing that is not clear is what put in rotation the turbine (0' 33" start the white arrow). I mean: you made an analysis of the rotational velocity and his effect on the blade shape, but how the wind velocity put in rotation the blade in order to have a rotational velocity? Because I'm not an expert, and I was doing the same objection of Hilmar. Second consideration the lift force: looking the aircraft and at their wings shapes, it looks that the lift fforce is opposite to the one you show in the video (the reason why the plane fly). do I mistake? Tanks in advance Marco
what is happening on the windward surface of the blade? It's shape camber(?) looks as if it could also produce lift which would obviously oppose the lift generated by the other side of the blade..
Hi, I'm not sure what you mean. Which one is the windward surface? The lift comes from a pressure difference between the suction and the pressure sides of the airfoil, so there is only one lift force for a given airfoil in a given condition.
@@AshesWindTurbineSimulation The windward side is the side facing the the wind. It just seems like both sides would potentially create 'lift' given their shape . One side is obviously going to produce more lift to create the required difference, it just seems odd to me that the higher pressure side would have such a bulging shape (potentially lift positive) . I know this is a garbled statement..wish I could be standing in front of a blackboard drawing out what I mean. Thanks for your response.
@@r.roddick7585 A side does not produce lift, it's the difference of pressure between two sides that produces lift (and drag). But I think I know what you mean: intuitively we tend to think that the 'bulgng' side is the pressure side, when it is actually the opposite! The bulging side is the suction side, and that is why the aerodynamic loads are in that direction. But you would be surprised how many models of wind turbine have this wrong...
Hi Zyad. Unfortunately we don't have the possibility to implement vertical axis turbines yet. In which context do you need to simulate one? You can also send us a mail to support@simis.io if you want to discuss about your project. Cheers, The simis team
Hi Yassin, that sounds great! You can start by downloading and trying Ashes for free for two weeks here www.simis.io. If you send us an email explaining your project at support@simis.io we can also see how Ashes could best fit your needs
Definitely! You'll just have to create the polars and the blades yourself, but as long as you're doing a horizontal axis turbine there shouldn't be any problem.
In what context do you need to use it for the university? If you are lecturing or giving a class you'll need an educational version. If you're a student feel free to use the 2-week triel version from www.simis.io. There isn't really a simulation that we can share, we just use the template model and use the velocity triangle feature, you should be able to reproduce it if you follow the steps in this video
Betz limit is about harnessing wind energy from the wind - you can always increase the available power in the wind through the use of diffusers, but that is different
According to Betz no wind turbine can extract more than 59.26% of the winds energy even if you design the most aerodynamic blades you will fail using the most advanced shaping possible you will fail why because Betz limit does not take into account the blade shape only the swept area of the turbine but the fact is that the wind pushes what it touches it can not push on the gaps between the blades regards Graham Flowers MEng
Interesting video, at least for viewers who know how to deal with forces represented as vectors. It is however very irritating to hear you say: "OK?" so many times, as you are not in direct contact with your viewers, so it's totally irrelevant to ask this question. It's not like we can say: "No, please explain it a litter better or slower!" If you did your job well, then you will probably get some likes. If you didn't, you'll probably find a lot of questions in the comments. Now this video is about five years old, so I hope you have learned a better way of presenting meanwhile. If not, then please consider what I just wrote.
thanks so much. 8 minutes of the video are more clear than 4 weeks studying this subject in the university.
Jaja same here, that's why we made the video!
Absolutely brilliant. This makes visualisation so much easier. I wish i could see something similar for the VAWT blade forces as they rotate.
Doing the DTU coursera wind energy certificate and this helped a lot to understand the aerodynamics module. This simulation model is amazing. Thank you!
That's great to hear, please tell your friends, and your teachers! And you can try Ashes for yourself for 2 weeks by downloading it for free form www.simis.io
same here!
Me too. This video was very helpful, thanks Ashes by Simis!
Bro, can you help me with my thesis?
BEST explanation about velocity triangle on UA-cam. Many tks
So happy that you liked it! You can also try it for yourself, by downloading Ashes at www.simis.io for a free two weeks trial
Best explanation of the velocity triangle I've seen. Thanks!
Good to hear! You can try Ashes out for free by downloading it from www.simis.io. And don't forget to tell your friends!
This really helped a lot! The DTU course on wind energy on Coursera should include this for better illustration.
You are right bro , this is more clear than they did
I agree. I also came from the same DTU Coursera course
Fantastic video for beginner who is looking into basics of wind turbine!
Glad you liked it!
How high is the turbine?
- That depends on the drug force.
(Great Video! Thank you for the great explanation)
Haha, good one!
very good diagramatric illustration. Thank you.
Hi I have a question. So according to your extremely well presented explanation, the rotational velocity of the wind is the main cause of the rotation of the blades because it is the one that induces Ftotal. (Mostly using Flift). The Ftotal causes Ftorque that rotates the blades. However, suppose the blades are not rotating at all and the wind starts to blow. How does the wind turbine even start rotating from a complete stop? Are there different forces at work during the startup?
Good question! The main contributor to the relative velocity is, as you said, the rotational velocity, but the incoming wind velocity also contributes. When the turbine is not rotating, only the incoming wind velocity will produce aerodynamic loads. These loads will be much smaller than when the turbine is in operation (i.e. rotating), but strong enough to start rotating the turbine. So the turbine will start rotating very slowly, which will produce a very small rotational velocity, which will increase the aerodynamic loads, which will make the turbine rotate a bit faster, which will increase the rotational velocity and so on.
But the best way to understand this would be to use the free trial period of Ashes and try to do it yourself (you could try to do something similar to our video, with an initial rotational velocity of 0 RPM). You can get the software at www.simis.io, and please let us know if it worked!
I was about to ask the same 🔥🔥🔥❤
Excellent explanation. I love the animations. Way to go, Ashes!
Thanks a lot!
Awesome. Starting to understand this (complex) stuff thanks to the video. Thank you so much
Complex indeed, glad the video helps a bit!
Very helpful to understand basics of wind turbine
Very happy you liked it!
So good! Thanks for making this!
Very well explained. Thank you.
If there was a million like here, i would click on it ,
It's really amazing and should be added to coursera course on velocity diagram
Haha if there was a million 'love comment' button I'd click that one! Great that you liked it, you should download Ashes (www.simis.io) and try the velocity triangle yourself!
@@AshesWindTurbineSimulation
I really appreciate your explanation, it help me alot ,
Do you have facebook or whatsapp , I am doing my final project of graduation, and it's about savinous wind turbine and need some point to be explained , thank you bro for everything you've done so far in your channel 😊🌹
@@ibrahimhamoud15 Wr're not experts in vertical axis, but you could try asking in our forum, and we'll see if we can answer. Here's the link: www.simis.io/q-and-a/
Very nice explanation. And interesting to see the thrust force, which comes with a lot of consequence, and unfortunately the lift force is not increasing over distance. That would really create a lot of torque. What is your idea of a variable pitching VAWT, like we demonstrate in our channel?
Sorry for late reply. We haven't looked at VAWTs at all, but are vey interested to do that in the future. Looking for the right context/project that will put VAWT loading to the top our our (very long) priority list (aka Trello boards). About thrust - I think it's fascinating that you cannot get rid of it by improving design - it's a consequence of first principles.
great video and software! made everything so much easier to visualize
Thanks (sorry for late reply)? Are you interested in wind turbines because of school, or professionally?
@@AshesWindTurbineSimulation Sorry totally missed this! Watched this mainly for a class at school but also potentially professionally in the future (:
Woow, perfect presentation. Thanks bro
Perfect explanation!
Thanks!
Very good video! Simple, clear and well explained. Well done, thank you.
Glad it was helpful!
Great video, thanks.
suggestion, make the next video 'Velocity vector at different angle of attack' Thank you :)
Noted, thanks for the suggestion! You can also try yourself if you feel like, you can try Ashes at www.simis.io
Thanks a lot!
Great video! Are you able to quantify how much larger the thrust force is than the torque, are the visual lengths true? To me the difference between the two appears to be too large, given that Betz' law in an impossibly ideal turbine would limit the difference to 59.3%/(1-59.3%)-1 = 45.7% (i.e. the energy left in the wind passing the turbine could be at minimum 45.7% larger than what's converted to electricity).
The visual lengths are proportional, but we don't recommend using them for numerical values. Instead, use sensors that give you live numerical values (that can be exported) and live graphs if you want that. For example, there is a sensor field for efficiency, ie mechanical power (torque * rotational speed) divided by incoming power in the wind. For a well designed wind turbine the max value is around 50% < Betz limit of 59%. I don't think understand your reasoning about efficiency/Betz. Seems like you don't take the rotational velocity into account? To get power, that is necessary. Please, elaborate, or better yet - try ASHES with the 2 w evaluation license and look at sensors, and then elaborate. Or are you studying wind turbines at university, and already using ASHES in class?
Fantastic simulation!
really perfect explenation i was looking for hours!
Great that you found it useful - please, tell your friends :-)
best video of the world
Well, maybe not the world, maybe just of UA-cam, but thanks a lot!
amazing!
what about validation of your software?
We have a benchmarking framework where we run tests and compare results with other software, full-scale data, experimental data and results from previous versions of Ashes.
We add new tests on a daily or weekly basis, every time we want to test something new (for example when there is a new feature). By running the tests every night we make sure that the results are always up to date.
The tests are run every night and published every new release (see www.simis.io/docs/validation-benchmarks-latest-reports for the latest reports). We think it is crucial that the tests are public and fully reproducible, so all the data needed to run the tests yourself are available as well.
This video explains how to understand and reproduce the tests: ua-cam.com/video/GkoBcUybSos/v-deo.html
And this blog post gives more details about how the whole thing works: www.simis.io/pages/blog/
thanks, excellent explanation, have you any video about flat blade turbines? since such a airfoil profile is not possible for small home made ones, but if you help we can diy better small turbines, 🙏🙏🙏
Nice simulation!!!
Glad you liked it!
Thank you for your video. Is it possible to have a negative pitch angle in the low wind speed region? what effect does this create on the WT performance?
Generally, for low wind speeds, the controller will make the rotor rotate at a speed that will provide the optimal tip speed ratio (the ratio of the blade tip velocity over the wind speed). This is done so that the angle of attack is the best one in terms of lift to drag ratio.
So a low wind speed will generally not produce a negative angle of attack
good explained. congrats
Glad it was helpful!
Nice! Thanks!
great video
Very happy you liked it!
Fantastic video!!!!!!
Glad you like it!
I liked your explanation.😊 can but I need to know what kind of simulation app are you using can you tell me please?
It's called Ashes, you have more info in the description
I am wondering how the pitch plays a role in this velocity triangle. Does increasing pitch always lead to an decrease in power or are there instances where increasing pitch actually ends up increasing power. Would this not depend on the turbine regimes?
Another question about the ASHES software, I was browsing through the documentation but did not find anything related to user defined wind functions, I know you can but I am not sure how. I want to model wind velocities that are different from the logarithmic wind law
Great question. The way the controller works for commercial wind turbines is that for low wind speeds (under the rated wind speed) it tries to keep the rotational speed of the rotor such that the angle between the airfoil and the total wind is optimal. So in that context, any pitching of the blades would move you away from the optimal point and thus decrease the power.
But you could design and mount the blade so that it is not operating at the optimal angle of attack, and then pitch the blades when you want that to happen.
About the wind speed, what type of wind are you trying to model?
@@AshesWindTurbineSimulation Thank you for your quick reply, I am trying to model low level jets wind
@@yashdagade1240 Low-level jet winds can be generated with TurbSim, which is included in Ashes. You will have to use the Turbulent wind creator for that (see www.simis.io/docs/user-manual-turbulent-wind-creator) and select te relevant parameters
explains so well! thank you!
Thanks for the comment - We are happy you found it useful. You can play around with the velocity triangle yourself during the 2 weeks evaluation of Ashes. Register and download the full version from simis.io.
Excellent !!!!
is it possible to do surface roughness analysis by this software....
XFoil comes with the software, so you could generate different polars for your airfoils for different surface roughnesses and then compare how they perform
Just awesome
Brilliant
Thanks!
this is gold... what's the name of the software? I wich we had this at RMIT!!
The software is Ashes, you can try it at www.simis.io.Do get in touch with us, at support@simis.io, we can have a chat on getting RMIT to use Ashes!
@@AshesWindTurbineSimulation done. I’ll be reaching out soon
Dear sir, Is this software usable for vertical axis wind turbine analysis? Is it freely available as open-source for students?
Yes, it can simulate VAWT as well. We don't offer free versions, but reduced academic licenses. Contact us to discuss options (www.simis.io/pages/contact/)
thanks bro
Thanks....best explanation
Bro, can you help me with our thesis?
Is it relevant for the vertical axis Savonius wind turbine?
Well, not really... The concept of the velocity triangle does apply, but since Savonius wind turbines are vertical axis turbines, things would look quite different
Can we set yaw angle to the turbine and draw velocity diagrams in this software? I want to see how thrust varies when there is yaw error!
Certainly! You can change the yaw angle under Analysis parameters-> Initial conditions. I suggest you post your question on our forum (www.simis.io/q-and-a/) so we can answer more in detail.
@@AshesWindTurbineSimulation Thank you. I have posted! :)
Can this software be used to design VAWT? and could it be used for CFD?
Unfortunately not yet, the way to solve for aerodynamic loads for VAWT is quite different. And it does not include CFD, only BEM.
hello sir, thank you such good description. i wanted to know what is rotor plane, i am not able to visulize it. can you please explain
Glad you liked it! The rotor plane is a plane that is perpendicular to the main shaft and goes through the hub. So if the cone angle was 0, all blades would be in the rotor plane. There is an illustration of the rotor plane in our theory manual, here: www.simis.io/help/#52d585d6f04f4e8e8fc587730bc4213d
wonderful
How can you sum up absolute velocity (wind speed) and rotational velocity to get the relative velocity? Wasn't it always u+w=v? What I want to say is that "u" should be turned the other way around
Hi Jesus
The rotational velocity is the apparent velocity 'felt' by the blade element as it moves through the air, so it is in the opposite direction of the motion of the element (and correctly drawn in this animation). But maybe we have different definitions of rotational velocity?
Is it possible to use ashes for floating offshore wind turbines?
Hi Satish
We have removed the floating module in the current version, but it will be available in a few weeks again. If you send us an email with your details at support@simis.io, we can keep you updated
How can I see the angle of attack in this program ?
The angle of attack is noted 'alpha' in the video, in the velocity triangle window. You can see it in the Blade station sensor also. For more info, check our manual here www.simis.io/help/#12b215b5ed3c45109db85b64c854876a
essential questions remain unanswered: why does one accept such huge thrust-forces with relatively little torque? it is torque you want in the end... so why does one not turn the airfoil more parallel to the wind direction? that would turn its liftforce more into the right direction (ideally parallel to the rotational plane). ok, this would increase drag, but you said it's very small. so why not accept some increase in drag in exchange for more torque and less useless, even counterproductive thrust?! secondly it remains entirely unclear why the wings of a modern windmill are so long and slender and why they taper towards the end, leaving a lot of wind(-force) unused that can pass through the rotation plane without meeting a blade...? intuitively one would broaden the wing towards the outer edge and incline it at an angle of something like 45 degrees to the wind direction, so that more wind is 'caught' and more torque is generated by turning the lift force towards the rotational plane? could you please answer these questions (without maths!) just using the visual force vectors and/or ideally experiments? thanx a lot!
Those are indeed excellent questions. Unfortunately we don’t have the capacity to prioritise making new videos at the moment, but I’ll try to reply here:
About rotating the airfoil: the direction of the lift (and the drag) is defined by the direction of the relative wind: the lift is perpendicular to the relative wind, and the drag is parallel. So if you rotated the airfoil (in any direction), you would not change the direction of the lift (because the relative wind would not change (at least initially, but let’s keep that for another time)). In the conditions shown in the video, the angle between the airfoil and the incoming wind is optimised to get the best lift-over-drag ratio. If we had more drag, the torque would be reduced and we would be producing less energy.
If you have the time, you should definitely try this with Ashes, it would be very obvious if you tried to reproduce the velocity triangle and pitch the blades!
About modifying the blade towards the tip: at the tip, the relative wind is almost parallel to the rotor plane (and thus perpendicular to the wind velocity), so if you pitched the blade 45 degrees you will actually drastically increase the drag, again, not what you want. And you are totally right that broadening the airfoils towards the tip would increase power production, but then you would have to reinforce the rest of the blade a lot for it to handle the deflections due to the increased aerodynamic forces and weight. There would also be an issue with the torque distribution along the blade: with the way blades are currently designed, it is more or less homogeneous, but with your suggestion you would have much larger forces at the tip, which would increase shear stresses within the blade.
So even though your suggestion makes a lot of sense from an aerodynamical point of view, there are structural reasons that make it more economical to have slender blades.
It is also very possible that there are other reasons that I am not aware of, that someone working with physical blades would be able to point out
@@AshesWindTurbineSimulation hello, one thing that is not clear is what put in rotation the turbine (0' 33" start the white arrow). I mean: you made an analysis of the rotational velocity and his effect on the blade shape, but how the wind velocity put in rotation the blade in order to have a rotational velocity? Because I'm not an expert, and I was doing the same objection of Hilmar.
Second consideration the lift force: looking the aircraft and at their wings shapes, it looks that the lift fforce is opposite to the one you show in the video (the reason why the plane fly). do I mistake?
Tanks in advance
Marco
It's not drug but drag (draag) force ;)
what is happening on the windward surface of the blade? It's shape camber(?) looks as if it could also produce lift which would obviously oppose the lift generated by the other side of the blade..
Hi, I'm not sure what you mean. Which one is the windward surface? The lift comes from a pressure difference between the suction and the pressure sides of the airfoil, so there is only one lift force for a given airfoil in a given condition.
@@AshesWindTurbineSimulation The windward side is the side facing the the wind. It just seems like both sides would potentially create 'lift' given their shape . One side is obviously going to produce more lift to create the required difference, it just seems odd to me that the higher pressure side would have such a bulging shape (potentially lift positive) . I know this is a garbled statement..wish I could be standing in front of a blackboard drawing out what I mean. Thanks for your response.
@@r.roddick7585 A side does not produce lift, it's the difference of pressure between two sides that produces lift (and drag). But I think I know what you mean: intuitively we tend to think that the 'bulgng' side is the pressure side, when it is actually the opposite! The bulging side is the suction side, and that is why the aerodynamic loads are in that direction. But you would be surprised how many models of wind turbine have this wrong...
What is the software's name?
It's called Ashes, you can get it here: www.simis.io
Can I make savinois rotor ?
Hi Zyad. Unfortunately we don't have the possibility to implement vertical axis turbines yet. In which context do you need to simulate one? You can also send us a mail to support@simis.io if you want to discuss about your project.
Cheers,
The simis team
Great !
Exzellent
Hi
I am studying Renewable Energies. and i want to design a Wind Turbine for my project using ashes
Hi Yassin, that sounds great! You can start by downloading and trying Ashes for free for two weeks here www.simis.io. If you send us an email explaining your project at support@simis.io we can also see how Ashes could best fit your needs
Can I use ASHES for Pinwheel type Wind Turbine ?
Definitely! You'll just have to create the polars and the blades yourself, but as long as you're doing a horizontal axis turbine there shouldn't be any problem.
May you send me tge simulation i have a presentation in university I need to explain. Please sir
In what context do you need to use it for the university? If you are lecturing or giving a class you'll need an educational version. If you're a student feel free to use the 2-week triel version from www.simis.io.
There isn't really a simulation that we can share, we just use the template model and use the velocity triangle feature, you should be able to reproduce it if you follow the steps in this video
Betz limit has been smashed and debunked regards Graham Flowers
Do you have a reference on that?
@@AshesWindTurbineSimulation hi have a look at my video called how I broke Betz limit regards Graham
Betz limit is about harnessing wind energy from the wind - you can always increase the available power in the wind through the use of diffusers, but that is different
According to Betz no wind turbine can extract more than 59.26% of the winds energy even if you design the most aerodynamic blades you will fail using the most advanced shaping possible you will fail why because Betz limit does not take into account the blade shape only the swept area of the turbine but the fact is that the wind pushes what it touches it can not push on the gaps between the blades regards Graham Flowers MEng
Interesting video, at least for viewers who know how to deal with forces represented as vectors. It is however very irritating to hear you say: "OK?" so many times, as you are not in direct contact with your viewers, so it's totally irrelevant to ask this question. It's not like we can say: "No, please explain it a litter better or slower!" If you did your job well, then you will probably get some likes. If you didn't, you'll probably find a lot of questions in the comments. Now this video is about five years old, so I hope you have learned a better way of presenting meanwhile. If not, then please consider what I just wrote.