Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.

The Battle for Henderson Field: An Astounding US Victory | Battle 360 | History

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 гру 2019
  • In October, 1942, the Japanese launch an assault to retake Guadalcanal. In the following Battle for Henderson field, the US delivered an astounding victory - and sunk a Japanese battleship. Discover the US tactics that led to victory in this video from Battle 360, "Enterprise vs. Japan." #Battle360
    Subscribe for more from Battle 360 and other great HISTORY shows:
    histv.co/Subscr...
    Find out more about the show and watch full episodes on our site:
    po.st/History-C...
    Check out exclusive HISTORY content:
    History Newsletter: po.st/HistoryNe...
    Website - po.st/HistoryWeb
    Facebook - po.st/HistoryFa...
    Twitter - po.st/HistoryTw...
    HISTORY® is the leading destination for award-winning original series and specials that connect viewers with history in an informative, immersive, and entertaining manner across all platforms. The network’s all-original programming slate features a roster of hit series, premium documentaries, and scripted event programming.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 381

  • @altongrimes
    @altongrimes 3 роки тому +130

    My dad was in there somewhere on a destroyer, the U.S.S. Strong. The Strong was sunk by Japanese torpedoes and a few men survived of which my dad was one.

    • @shadowling77777
      @shadowling77777 3 роки тому +2

      I wonder what it would have been like to be there.

    • @ninline2000
      @ninline2000 3 роки тому +3

      @@shadowling77777 Terrifying.

    • @briankelly7924
      @briankelly7924 3 роки тому +1

      My Dad was at Guadalcanal as well on a destroyer but I don't know which one.

    • @berrezougmounir
      @berrezougmounir 2 роки тому +2

      God blessed him

    • @Evolutionsquarefan
      @Evolutionsquarefan Рік тому +1

      2 years late but still that guy deserves a lot Of respect

  • @HarryWHill-GA
    @HarryWHill-GA 4 роки тому +57

    My uncle was a gunnery officer in the A turret of the Washington when it sank Kirishima.

    • @brad6118
      @brad6118 2 роки тому +4

      My great grandfather steered the Washington. I never knew this until a few days ago

    • @HarryWHill-GA
      @HarryWHill-GA 2 роки тому

      @@brad6118 Cool. Perhaps he had the QM watch when my uncle had the deck at some point.

    • @allanboyer2769
      @allanboyer2769 4 місяці тому +1

      @@brad6118 Your great grandfather helped save the men on Guadalcanal. He was a hero.

  • @johnlarocco3348
    @johnlarocco3348 3 роки тому +31

    God bless Admiral Lee and the USS Washington BB-56 and all who helped in this Legendary Engagement of Battleships. Go Navy God Bless America.

  • @southwestvirginiarailfan729
    @southwestvirginiarailfan729 4 роки тому +459

    Back when y'all actually showed stuff about history.

    • @TruthNerds
      @TruthNerds 4 роки тому +12

      Yes! As is my personal custom, I do have one quibble :-) :
      HE shells by the time weren't made of lead, but of steel, with, as the name implies, a high explosive inside (plus fuse, detonator etc., of course). There were some shells (commonly termed HEAP = high explosive anti-personnel) that additionally contained lead shot, and lead was one possible material for a rotating band (a band around the shell, softer than the shell itself, which engages the rifling on firing, so that the projectile is spin-stabilized), and there were a few other specialized applications.
      A hollow lead shell would not have withstood the force of the propellant explosion, in fact, as stronger steels were developed, weaker steels, and, earlier, cast iron, were replaced by them. The reason is simple: If your shell material is stronger, you can make the projectile's wall thinner, and you can put in more explosives without changing the caliber.
      TL;DR: HE shells were mostly made of steel to give them structure, and explosives to give them destructive power.

    • @csabaszep8162
      @csabaszep8162 4 роки тому +5

      Don't you guys like UFO "documentaries"?

    • @FM-ig3th
      @FM-ig3th 4 роки тому +7

      Or that stupid "picker" show 24/7

    • @kbanghart
      @kbanghart 4 роки тому

      Oh look, another comment about history...

    • @kbanghart
      @kbanghart 4 роки тому +1

      @@FM-ig3th That's a great show, what are you talking about

  • @FallGuy-68
    @FallGuy-68 11 місяців тому +7

    My Grandpa Jack was on the U.S.S Washington and was in this battle. I had no idea what he had been through until years later. I once asked him if he was ever afraid.during battle's and he said they were too busy and they focused on doing their task properly. He passed away in 1994.

  • @tigertiger1699
    @tigertiger1699 4 роки тому +142

    Shame, been to northern Aussie not far from the coral sea... seen and thank the graves of your American kids... thanked them for saving our parents 🌹

    • @tigertiger1699
      @tigertiger1699 4 роки тому +4

      Regan Orr
      Thank you to your Dad... I’ll see if I can send you a photo of the lands that he help save👍

    • @tigertiger1699
      @tigertiger1699 4 роки тому +5

      Regan Orr
      Yeah it won’t let me.., but you must come n see the South Pacific... there are memorials here in NZ.., far more up in North Aussie.., and throughout all the tiny island nations.., they were treated very badly, esp when they help a yank.. & they did... Shame our boys were away in Africa..., Our.who dated your kids .., said they were so you.., drank milk & chewed gum.., in her words “next they were in the “islands” breathing said water”🌹🙏... not sure what to say..., she & Dad made! Us kids to know of the suffering and sacrifice made for us here in NZ and the Pacific...
      We lost out kids in Africa , Crete and Europe, esp in “bomber command with the brits..

    • @tigertiger1699
      @tigertiger1699 4 роки тому +7

      Regan Orr
      Just watched the latest movie Midway in the weekend.. I’m getting to old, cuts me to see the trouble the US is going through..

    • @joehoppy4912
      @joehoppy4912 4 роки тому +12

      The day I was leaving Sydney, after a week of R&R from Vietnam, I was standing outside my hotel, in my Dress Navy Whites, waiting for a taxi back to the airport. Suddenly an older woman approached me and thanked me, actually the US Navy, for saving Australia in the Battle of the Coral Sea in WW II. I was very surprised but quickly composed myself and accepted her thanks! I will never forget that.

    • @BelloBudo007
      @BelloBudo007 3 роки тому +3

      @@joehoppy4912 That was very nice of her. Far too few now even bother to remember the sacrifices others made for our freedom. Thank goodness for USA.

  • @stevenklinkhamer9069
    @stevenklinkhamer9069 3 роки тому +11

    A stunning engagement, that only true history buffs tend to fully appreciate.

  • @damienford5769
    @damienford5769 3 роки тому +5

    STAND ASIDE IM COMING THROUGH IS THE BEST BATTLE CALL

  • @danzervos7606
    @danzervos7606 4 роки тому +75

    Further analysis has shown that Kirishima sank due to progressive flooding and was not scuttled.

  • @Laura-Yu
    @Laura-Yu 4 роки тому +167

    Yes, more content like this, History Channel!

    • @HISTORY
      @HISTORY  4 роки тому +18

      Hi Laura! Thanks for watching! Subscribe to never miss a new video!

    • @Laura-Yu
      @Laura-Yu 4 роки тому +8

      HISTORY Definitely👍

    • @johnbrattan9341
      @johnbrattan9341 4 роки тому +7

      @@HISTORY You're being a bit disingenuous about terming this vid 'The battle for Henderson Field' as an "Astounding US victory." Obviously in the end it was a US victory, but at great cost. You failed to mention (for some obscure reason) the US lost 24 warships...8 cruisers, 2 heavy carriers, and 14 destroyers. And you make no mention of the Naval Battle of Savo Island.

    • @Boomkokogamez
      @Boomkokogamez 4 роки тому +6

      @@johnbrattan9341 It was in the episode of battle 360, this is just a clip of it

    • @Alex_Guy1011
      @Alex_Guy1011 4 роки тому +1

      @@HISTORY Will there be, or is there an official soundtrack for the series?

  • @tobyshimabukuro4414
    @tobyshimabukuro4414 4 роки тому +142

    The animation in these are great

    • @bobjennings6673
      @bobjennings6673 4 роки тому

      It would be better if the picture would stop shaking.

    • @Omegadoomship
      @Omegadoomship 4 роки тому

      Bob Jennings It’s just for cinematic effect. A little shaking is fine for concussive blasts for a bit of realism. If there’s too much, it can be a bit distracting.

    • @falseprofit2569
      @falseprofit2569 4 роки тому

      @@Omegadoomship yeah I like it better that way

    • @kenhurley4441
      @kenhurley4441 3 роки тому

      I typically don't watch "animation", however this one is the best I've watched through.

    • @berrezougmounir
      @berrezougmounir 2 роки тому

      They making it in 2006

  • @wiserdaley2191
    @wiserdaley2191 4 роки тому +13

    The narrator has a golden voice! It's like a movie I'm watching.

  • @SandraHof
    @SandraHof 14 днів тому

    My dear father was part of the 1st Marine Div -Amphibious Div that made the first landing on Guadalcanal. He was part of the ones assigned to guard Henderson Field. He said the Japanese bombed them every night. He was so sick with malaria and dysentery and all of them were suffering from starvation. I am so grateful he survived. Many did not. He went on to become a wonderful father of three. He retired after 30 years as a Los Angeles Police officer. He was awarded the Medal of Valor by the LAPD for rescuing a family of four from a burning vehicle. He passed away in my arms at 91 years of age.💔 A life well lived. I miss him everyday. They truly were the "Greatest Generation".

  • @eatshit2863
    @eatshit2863 4 роки тому +9

    This video if from the olden days when the history channel actually presented history.

  • @Milliardo5
    @Milliardo5 4 роки тому +40

    One of the things that doomed the IJN: no radar on their ships. They still relied on sight and range finder while US ships already had radar.

    • @garysuth7121
      @garysuth7121 Рік тому

      Thats true but the japanese had superior night vision optics which gave them the advantage in the earlier battles.

  • @euanreid6682
    @euanreid6682 4 роки тому +39

    Astounding when one side had Radar and the other didn't... more like expected.

    • @williamdaniels6943
      @williamdaniels6943 4 роки тому +8

      i would not say expected but the radar given to us by the british was an advantage. in those days about a 15 min advantage. it was a much better advantage at midway because were always ready when we were attacked!

    • @marksummers463
      @marksummers463 4 роки тому +4

      But it really wasnt reliable then.

    • @trashpanda314
      @trashpanda314 4 роки тому +7

      @@williamdaniels6943 Midway was determined by breaking the Japanese naval code, not radar.

    • @kbanghart
      @kbanghart 4 роки тому +2

      @@trashpanda314 and a few other factors as well, but yeah the code was the main one

    • @memecliparchives2254
      @memecliparchives2254 4 роки тому

      The first battle of Savo Island: Am I joke to you?

  • @FuzzyMarineVet
    @FuzzyMarineVet 3 роки тому +4

    Adm. "Ching" Lee was correct in ordering the other ships to get out of his way. The Combat Information Center on the USS Washington was better at directing gunfire by radar than the rest of the fleet, and radar was the only way they could detect the enemy on that night.

    • @xGoodOldSmurfehx
      @xGoodOldSmurfehx 3 роки тому +1

      interestingly enough the Japanese had night vision technology in the form of infrared scopes which im pretty sure they acquired the technology from Germany
      so while the US battleships were tracking the Japanese on radar, the Japanese were visually tracking the US battleships in scopes

  • @mikesmith-wk7vy
    @mikesmith-wk7vy 3 роки тому +5

    nice, back when history channel was actually about history

  • @johnvasquez6771
    @johnvasquez6771 4 роки тому +3

    This is why we don’t kneel we don’t disrespect the people that gave their life for freedom

  • @Wil_Dasovich
    @Wil_Dasovich 4 роки тому +23

    awesome

  • @The_Dudester
    @The_Dudester 4 роки тому +13

    Back in the early 1990's there was a movie about a sailor on the Washington-he was only 16 years old. He was asleep on the deck and didn't hear the alarms. He was actually outside as the 16 inch guns went off. He was injured and taken to a hospital where his true age was found.
    I think Ricky Schroeder played the sailor.

  • @MakisigGaming
    @MakisigGaming 3 роки тому +108

    Brought to you by World of Warships.

    • @user-md6vc1zf8j
      @user-md6vc1zf8j 3 роки тому +10

      Kraken unleashed

    • @Yungbsao
      @Yungbsao 3 роки тому +3

      Click the link in the description and you’ll get special access to the HMS Dreadnought and 7 days of premium account time

    • @intermodus2180
      @intermodus2180 3 роки тому

      No

  • @Idahoguy10157
    @Idahoguy10157 4 роки тому +13

    The Battleship Washington fired on Battleship Kirishima from 9,000 yards and wrecked it. While the Japanese warships had target fixation on Battleship South Dakota. The US Navy lost all four Destroyers brought to the battle. The Battleship South Dakota returned fire very little due to engineering failures

    • @johnkempf1808
      @johnkempf1808 4 роки тому

      Nothing happened to the Washington?

    • @Idahoguy10157
      @Idahoguy10157 4 роки тому +1

      john kempf ... it’s electrical distribution bus failed. It was blinded and without power

    • @johnkempf1808
      @johnkempf1808 4 роки тому +2

      @@Idahoguy10157 Just read the damage report on the South Dakota. She had lots of shells that went below the superstructure and didn't explode. Her searchlights and deck were scathed with holes from 3 inch to 14 inch shells . The crazy part was that the only real fire damage was from a couple of lifejackets getting sparked.

    • @Idahoguy10157
      @Idahoguy10157 4 роки тому +5

      john kempf ... it literally was a new ship. The shakedown cruise would have been minimal. Manned by sailors without prior service. Against the professional Japanese Navy. The South Dakota and Washington pulled off a defeat of the IJN. That’s impressive

    • @kbanghart
      @kbanghart 4 роки тому

      I just recently read that someone accidentally tripped a circuit breaker on the South Dakota, causing power to go out over parts of the ship

  • @Peterax788
    @Peterax788 4 роки тому +9

    Please release the full episodes of Battle 360 again

    • @madmann5373
      @madmann5373 4 роки тому

      Could not agree more.only find the odd number episodes.

    • @madmann5373
      @madmann5373 4 роки тому

      @@azdubz2021 Thanks for the heads up.

  • @stephenbowden4766
    @stephenbowden4766 4 роки тому +7

    Great Job to ALL OF THE AMERICAN FORCES DURING THAT HISTORIC VICTORY BATTLE

  • @rickclouston778
    @rickclouston778 3 роки тому +1

    From the halls of Montezuma...to the hills of Bloody ridge. Semper Fi.

  • @geomodelrailroader
    @geomodelrailroader 4 роки тому +20

    USS Washington vs Kirishima it is Battleship vs Battleship where winner takes all

  • @jaronanderson9168
    @jaronanderson9168 4 роки тому +13

    Legend has the sharks of the pacific dont use chopsticks with their Japenese

    • @riendegreef3565
      @riendegreef3565 4 роки тому

      Rmor
      @ ytz
      MORTIS - ' morytz
      Laviedamst
      dream @ Amsterdam

  • @Feargal011
    @Feargal011 Рік тому +1

    The night-time battle was later described by USN commanders as 'a bar room brawl with the lights shot out'.

  • @darkstock5103
    @darkstock5103 3 роки тому +4

    One of the only Battleship duels in the Pacific Theatre

    • @allanboyer2769
      @allanboyer2769 4 місяці тому

      The only one on one, toe to toe slugfest. Unfortunately for Kirishima, she was too busy mauling South Dakota to even see Washington until it was too late.

    • @darkstock5103
      @darkstock5103 4 місяці тому

      @@allanboyer2769 yeah like Kirishima would have even stood a chance against USS Washington even if she knew about Washington’s presence

  • @meikel1492
    @meikel1492 3 роки тому +3

    “stand aside i am coming through” reminds me of that justice league scene where green lantern says “stand back and peep the light show green lanterns got this” then he gets waxed by all those goons

  • @johnmcdonald9304
    @johnmcdonald9304 4 роки тому +2

    The night of November 14, 1942 was one of the worst nights in US Navy history. It was called "The battle Of Iron Bottom Sound'' and it was when the Japanese got their revenge for The Battle of Midway.

    • @johnemerson1363
      @johnemerson1363 4 роки тому +2

      You are talking about the Battle of Savo Island on 9 August 1942 when a Japanese bombardment group found a US cruiser task force in the way and destroyed them. We lost four cruisers and some destroyers and Henderson field was wide open to bombardment. That was the worst US naval defeat of wwII.

  • @stevenkramer2616
    @stevenkramer2616 4 роки тому +52

    Lead? Battleship rounds are made of steel.

    • @Biggiecheese706
      @Biggiecheese706 4 роки тому +14

      Steven Kramer I think it’s for dramatic affect

    • @Thor_Odinson
      @Thor_Odinson 4 роки тому +4

      yeah I know.....

    • @stevenkramer2616
      @stevenkramer2616 4 роки тому +2

      @@Biggiecheese706 That why I said it.

    • @flynntaggart8549
      @flynntaggart8549 4 роки тому +6

      lead, as in the colloquial vernacular for anything shot out of a gun.

    • @lancelotkillz
      @lancelotkillz 4 роки тому +1

      He kept saying rifle

  • @ericintohistory
    @ericintohistory 3 роки тому +2

    That wasn't a gun fight. It was a back alley brawl.

    • @Feargal011
      @Feargal011 Рік тому

      It was described by USN commanders as 'a bar room brawl with the lights shot out'.

  • @DaveKraft1
    @DaveKraft1 4 роки тому +108

    Without diminishing the accomplishment of BB-56 Washington in sinking the Kirishima, this red-white and-blue account of the Second Naval Battle of Guadalcanal is hugely inaccurate as "history," and does a major disservice to the over 240 U.S. sailors who died during this critical engagement. A far better and more accurate account can be read on Wiki (Search: Naval Battles of Guadalcanal).
    While BB-56 did indeed pummel Kirishima into eventual sinking, what gets left out of this fairy-tail account is that BB-57 South Dakota, also on this mission, experienced an electrical failure at a critical moment which knocked out her guns for a period of time, resulting in Kirishima and others pounding her badly. Also ignored completely is that the 4 U.S. destroyers assigned to this Task Force that night were sunk, at great loss of life. Not even mentioning these facts is a huge disrespect of the sacrifice of those men that night.
    As stirring rah-rah U.S. "history", this account is adequate. But it's not real history -- it's incomplete propaganda which is an insult to the brave sailors who participated in that battle, many of whom died that night.

    • @madmann5373
      @madmann5373 4 роки тому +12

      Could not agree more.

    • @billcorbell5362
      @billcorbell5362 4 роки тому +8

      I was always told by my dad, who served in the Pacific that that battle was at best, a draw.

    • @FM-ig3th
      @FM-ig3th 4 роки тому +13

      It all ended in two mushroom clouds over Japan. So how's that for a rah rah story. BTW, Go 🇺🇸.

    • @worldman3218
      @worldman3218 4 роки тому +23

      @DaveKraft1 You do realize this is a 5 minute clip from a 45 minute episode right? All the things in your comment were discussed in the full episode. Try watching the entire series first before commenting.

    • @DaveKraft1
      @DaveKraft1 4 роки тому +8

      @@worldman3218 Yes, I had seen the entire series before. It's kind of irrelevant though if you're going to post this as a stand-alone piece. Quite honestly, that whole rah-rah flavor of the entire series was really off-putting. It occurred in almost every episode. It's commentary seemed designed to stir up nationalistic sentiments, not history; and shouldn't masquerade as history. Contrast the manner in which Jonathan Parshall, a naval historian, makes his points with the way that uniformed Marine sergeant (sorry, don't have access to his name) makes his. I don't think REAL history needs a "color commentator." It's not a Superbowl. The thrills are too cheap, and misleading.

  • @rafsmith1993
    @rafsmith1993 4 роки тому +25

    These ships do not fire lead ammunition.

  • @longnguyen6836
    @longnguyen6836 4 роки тому +8

    My god, now I am pumped and I have no clue what to waste this energy on.
    Wife!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Where you at

    • @rwarren58
      @rwarren58 4 роки тому

      This is why wives either love or hate the history channel! Go get 'em Tiger!

  • @gunslingerluckytankijunky
    @gunslingerluckytankijunky 3 роки тому +5

    When US battleships swing their massive metal ball bats.

  • @TaeaoFalaile-qo1lq
    @TaeaoFalaile-qo1lq Рік тому

    Best history in the video.

  • @andrewallen9993
    @andrewallen9993 4 роки тому +30

    Victory thanks to the British radar designs given to the US enabling the US ships to accurately aim at the Japanese during the night.

    • @billcorbell5362
      @billcorbell5362 4 роки тому +19

      You neglect to mention the upgrades made by the U.S. to the British invention.

    • @andrewallen9993
      @andrewallen9993 4 роки тому +1

      @@billcorbell5362 You mean like the cavity magnetron?

    • @julianpichardo5045
      @julianpichardo5045 4 роки тому +10

      andrew allen The British help us out after the hundreds of tanks,cars,planes, guns and ammunition we gave them for lend lease

    • @julianpichardo5045
      @julianpichardo5045 4 роки тому +2

      alex lyster Sold but at one of the greatest discounts ever. And parts of their debt were scratched off

    • @timearly5226
      @timearly5226 4 роки тому +2

      andrew allen Much of that technology was shared with us to help with development and mass production as the UK's production capacity had about reached its limits.
      I worked on radar in the U.S. Navy and found the cavity magnetron the Brits developed to be brilliant engineering.
      Also, thank you for your contribution to the LIGO upgrade which made it possible for us to detect gravity waves! 👍

  • @tihzho
    @tihzho 4 роки тому +19

    16" gun firing American lead?? There's no lead in an APCBC armor piercing 16" shell.

    • @davids9520
      @davids9520 4 роки тому +14

      Stop being so dam picky. They are just adding emotion to describing the battle taking place in the video.

    • @tihzho
      @tihzho 4 роки тому +3

      @@davids9520 Thought it was supposed to be a history video

    • @jojodelima1953
      @jojodelima1953 4 роки тому +12

      Lead, just a gunfighter expression from the old west

    • @tihzho
      @tihzho 4 роки тому +1

      @@jojodelima1953 Yes I know

    • @tihzho
      @tihzho 4 роки тому

      @Ryy Dog Why not?

  • @spiritofthewolf15x
    @spiritofthewolf15x Рік тому

    This is History channel at its best

  • @madmann5373
    @madmann5373 4 роки тому +4

    This is from battle 360, Enterprise. to bad they don't have all the episodes on the tube.but the ones do have are great.Alsp check out Patton battle 360.

  • @estellemelodimitchell8259
    @estellemelodimitchell8259 4 роки тому +7

    Even a 5” gun is called a riffle.

    • @surejonathon6689
      @surejonathon6689 4 роки тому

      Because no gun is big enough for the U.S

    • @chetogan2087
      @chetogan2087 4 роки тому

      A riffle is a rough place on a body of water

  • @gothicalpha
    @gothicalpha 4 роки тому +18

    No mention of how the Kirishima savaged the South Dakota BB look it up

    • @Hunpecked
      @Hunpecked 4 роки тому +7

      The clip leaves out a lot, probably to save air time.

    • @kbanghart
      @kbanghart 4 роки тому

      Today I just read that South Dakota screwed up, somebody on board tripped a circuit breaker or something which took power out from the ship for a while

    • @casualguy3938
      @casualguy3938 4 роки тому +2

      @@kbanghart Incorrect. It was hit by 26 shells, at least 1 of which damaged the electrical system, which was out for 3 minutes.

    • @TDavis-ml6kl
      @TDavis-ml6kl 3 роки тому

      USS South Dakota "I run from a fight" battleship

    • @ayden6899
      @ayden6899 3 роки тому

      @@casualguy3938 nope you are incorrect, it’s electrical systems failed before the fight

  • @cawtgrinnenandstuff6902
    @cawtgrinnenandstuff6902 4 роки тому +6

    They just said in this video it was the only Battleship on Battleship fight and sinking of another during WWII. For being experts in history they obviously forgot about the Bismark sinking the Hood in 1940 or the battleships that went after and sank the Bismark later

    • @billcorbell5362
      @billcorbell5362 4 роки тому +7

      The hood was a battle cruiser, the Bismarck was sunk by two British cruisers.

    • @zacharyzier314
      @zacharyzier314 4 роки тому +4

      They said only American battleship, this is technically correct.

    • @jamess7576
      @jamess7576 4 роки тому +1

      @@zacharyzier314
      Battle of Surigao Strait

    • @benderrodriguez142
      @benderrodriguez142 4 роки тому +1

      @@jamess7576 in the battle of Surigao straight the IJN battleships were sank by torpedoes, not by BB fire.

    • @benderrodriguez142
      @benderrodriguez142 4 роки тому

      @Apple Gamers Incorporated while there was an enemy battleship "sank" there, it was moored at dock and had only one operational turret.

  • @kalan4787
    @kalan4787 2 роки тому +2

    My favorite of Biden's stories is the one of how he got his Medal of Honor for bayonetting Ho Chi Minh at the Battle of Henderson Field. It's also where he got the honorific "G.I. Joe."

    • @warp9p659
      @warp9p659 Рік тому

      Lol. C'mon man, you know, the.............thang.

  • @siddhartha4953
    @siddhartha4953 4 роки тому +1

    Amazing animation.

  • @MrAwsomenoob
    @MrAwsomenoob 3 роки тому +1

    Doesn't bring up the four destroyers lost and the beating the battleship south Dakota took prior to the Washington kirishima engagment.

  • @EK14MeV
    @EK14MeV 7 місяців тому

    Nice clip, BUT the documentary left out critical facts of this battle, that further the high stakes drama of this firefight.
    1 Battleship South Dakota was brutally damaged, losing radar and frequently power throughout the battle. I read that it took about 40 shell hits.
    2 IJN made a fatal error of concentrating fire on South Dakota, as battleship Washington, undetected, continued to fire unopposed at Kirishima.
    3 The RAdm Lee was the top radar gunnery expert in the world, early in on its development for the US Navy.
    4 Kirishima was scuttled later the following day by its commander, though Lee got credit for the sinking.
    5 USA suffered terrible ship losses.

  • @kawaiikindcake1023
    @kawaiikindcake1023 2 роки тому

    U.S.S Washington receives citadel crisis. World of warships reference

  • @AlphaFoxDelta
    @AlphaFoxDelta 4 роки тому +21

    Lol, move aside, I'm coming through to end this man's whole career.

    • @franklinbarrett4630
      @franklinbarrett4630 4 роки тому +2

      “Move aside, I’m coming through.” Refers to a particular point of this battle. Four US destroyers were in line in front of the two battleships. They came in contact with the Japanese first and were sunk or heavily damaged quickly. Then Washington and South Dakota came forward through the wreckage to engage the enemy fleet to take advantage of a brief element of surprise.

    • @AlphaFoxDelta
      @AlphaFoxDelta 4 роки тому +1

      @@franklinbarrett4630 Yeah, it's a really awesome part of US history for sure

  • @charlesmanning5819
    @charlesmanning5819 3 роки тому +1

    Awesome 😎

  • @GreyKnightInvio
    @GreyKnightInvio 4 місяці тому

    There was a reason the USS Washington was so accurate and vicious thanks to the admiral that commanded her

  • @TheChuyDewy
    @TheChuyDewy 4 роки тому +2

    This is why im subscribed in the first place.

  • @alexius23
    @alexius23 4 роки тому +1

    Bit of a mistake....the old USS Battleships sank the IJN Yamashiro (battleship) at the Battle of Suriago Strait

  • @williamdaniels6943
    @williamdaniels6943 3 роки тому

    that radar played a bigger part at midway then is mentioned. it was only about a 15 min warning but in 15 min you could clear your deck . man your guns. and move up to flank speed. a decisive advantage. thank the english for that advantage!

  • @e.r.1702
    @e.r.1702 4 роки тому +2

    Nobody:
    American battleships:dish it out!

  • @diddlebug7241
    @diddlebug7241 4 роки тому +13

    They got what they had coming; remember Pearl Harbor.

  • @robertjohnson8938
    @robertjohnson8938 4 роки тому +1

    Good show

  • @fataldestiny7290
    @fataldestiny7290 4 роки тому +3

    Go Washington 💪 huuura

  • @chaosmike89th
    @chaosmike89th 3 місяці тому

    Boy they just glossed right over the part where the US destroyer screen got shredded.

  • @highplainsaccountability6482
    @highplainsaccountability6482 4 роки тому +1

    My Uncle Manuel fought and was wounded at Guadalcanal

  • @MCPEBuilder-gt7nd
    @MCPEBuilder-gt7nd 3 роки тому +2

    when history talks about ww2 and then said 10 miles away

  • @gibsondrummer
    @gibsondrummer 4 роки тому +2

    The image of the washington shows the shape of an iowa class bb

  • @surfdocer103
    @surfdocer103 3 місяці тому

    I might be wrong, but I believe the real prize were the transport ships that were delayed and caught out in the daylight by American Wildcats and bombers. The destruction of the men and equipment resulted in the decision to evacuate.

  • @joelmccoy9969
    @joelmccoy9969 3 роки тому

    Two of South Dakota's front turrets' 16" rifles were defective and could not be fired

  • @spankthatdonkey
    @spankthatdonkey 4 роки тому +2

    No background on the radar advantage of US ships?

  • @ForedeckYoda
    @ForedeckYoda 4 роки тому +7

    This video misses about 20 SUPER interesting factoids about that battle!

  • @WJack97224
    @WJack97224 4 роки тому +4

    Well, the Washington with radar and 16" guns vs. no radar and 14" guns sounds like the Kirishima was way over-matched and so the result was not surprising.

    • @marksummers463
      @marksummers463 4 роки тому

      Except that the radar wasnt reliable and battleships make easy targets for Japanese destroyer torpedoes which greatly outranged ours.

    • @WJack97224
      @WJack97224 4 роки тому +1

      @@marksummers463 , I understand. And what about range of projectiles 16" vs. 14" and armor of the Kirishima vs. Washington?

    • @marksummers463
      @marksummers463 4 роки тому

      @@WJack97224 The problem was that the US would see the Japanese ships at night, turn perpendicular to the J line of ships to "cross their "T" and get hit by a million ultra long range Japanese torpedoes (long lance) fired by the J. destroyers, effectively ending the fight. In the narrow straights that problem was very big.

    • @WJack97224
      @WJack97224 4 роки тому +1

      @@@marksummers463, Did the Japanese score hits with their torpedoes?

    • @marksummers463
      @marksummers463 4 роки тому +2

      @@WJack97224 Heck yes! All over the place in just about every battle in Iron Bottom Sound. Our torpedoes were short range and rarely worked as they were supposed to.

  • @royalteluis623
    @royalteluis623 4 роки тому +1

    1st rule for a battle ship duel . Always being bigger guns

    • @niclasjohansson4333
      @niclasjohansson4333 4 роки тому +1

      The caliber of the guns was of little importance, Kirishima was an old, pre ww1 battlecruiser without a radar, and fireing on the South Dakota, that would have been sunk if the undetected Washington did not emerge "from nowhere" to crash the party.

  • @gingerhimself7117
    @gingerhimself7117 3 роки тому +3

    No mention of how Kirishima was targeting South Dakota, severely damaging Dakota which allowed Washington to move in for the kill, but whatever

    • @jacobw446
      @jacobw446 3 роки тому

      Or that the South Dakota had major electrical issues, because they rushed her to the Pacific. She did not get a proper shakedown cruise and it showed. South Dakota had to return to the States for major repairs after this battle, until 1943, having been subjected to dozens of hits from the Japanese fleet that targeted her.. and did not see the Washington. The South Dakota was lucky that she did not get sunk.

    • @justinebautista1383
      @justinebautista1383 3 роки тому

      she was lightly damaged but ok.

  • @nolisanico1105
    @nolisanico1105 3 роки тому +1

    I love USS Washington Its the Only US Battleship to sink an Enemy Battleship

  • @martin2560
    @martin2560 3 роки тому

    US Veterans are ordinary people doing extraordinary thing's.

  • @WilliamDye-willdye
    @WilliamDye-willdye 4 роки тому +1

    HISTORY CHANNEL: Please update the description in this video. It currently contains several links which use a redirection site that was shut down in January 2020. Consequently, all of the links in your description are currently broken.

  • @amsterdammancom
    @amsterdammancom 4 роки тому

    Too bad they didn't use actual footage of the big ships in action.
    Much better than computer game screens...

    • @rwarren58
      @rwarren58 4 роки тому

      It looks as if it were a night battle. You'd only be able to see grainy fires with that 1942 film. Unless John Ford was filming it, of course.

  • @sheerazpasha294
    @sheerazpasha294 4 роки тому +1

    Salute to the brave Japan 🇯🇵

  • @donbaker4441
    @donbaker4441 4 роки тому +1

    Nice to hear all of the action and history but a very poor video due to lack of night vision on my part. Watching a black screen with a splash of light is one thing but really not that we'll done .to show a huge piece of history

    • @butchyshoe
      @butchyshoe 3 роки тому +1

      Well it is showing the history. No cameraman was sitting in a rowboat taking movies !! Just saying .

  • @navveteran9944
    @navveteran9944 3 роки тому

    They were armor Piercing high explosive salvos, not led.

  • @johnpenley
    @johnpenley 4 роки тому +1

    Just curious, but did the tail guns on the Dauntless have a mechanism to stop the involuntary damage to the tail fins??🤔
    They always look dangerously close to shearing off the tail assembly??

    • @memecliparchives2254
      @memecliparchives2254 4 роки тому +1

      Actually they explained this part during the series episodes concerning Midway. Lloyd Childers was a rear seat gunner was being chased by a Japanese Zero on his tail and the Zero was out of ammo. So the pilot of the Zero planned to cut the plane off with his propeller. Lloyd then carefully aimed and constantly swayed his sights on the enemy, knowing that he'll hit his own plane tail of he just opened up.

  • @GintokiHatake
    @GintokiHatake 4 роки тому

    Isn't it the same night as what happened during Friday the 13 of November 1942?

  • @edmondmcdowell9690
    @edmondmcdowell9690 3 роки тому +1

    The South Dakota took a beating in that engagement all the fighting was done by Washington.

  • @Hosta91
    @Hosta91 3 роки тому

    Where was the part where the USS South Dakota got mauled because it lost power due to its guns overloading the electrical circuit so it sailed blind into the Japanese fleet and got an overhauling

  • @josegregoriochirinosgomez5926
    @josegregoriochirinosgomez5926 4 роки тому

    Muy buenas películas

  • @alexius23
    @alexius23 3 роки тому

    Washington was so close to IJN Kirashima that Washington could use its 5” dual purpose guns

    • @memecliparchives2254
      @memecliparchives2254 3 роки тому

      Yep. About 45 shells from its 5 inch guns fired. Only 9 shells from its 16 inch against Kirishima.

  • @Vipersnake21
    @Vipersnake21 3 роки тому

    And the South Dakota take heavy damage in this night battle

  • @dwarfie24
    @dwarfie24 3 роки тому

    I am glad I have laternatives to history channel now. If I only had listened to their biased videoes I would also chant USA at every opportunity i got.

  • @truthquest
    @truthquest 4 роки тому +3

    Once again, "HISTORY" channel intentionally ignored the truth to make the show more heroic and melodramatic.
    Just before the Kirishima's death, 4 US destroyers were completely anihilated by a sole IJN destroyer, besides, South Dacota was crippled by more than 36 hits.

  • @paulweaver6064
    @paulweaver6064 4 роки тому

    My Father served on the Washington
    Chief

    • @butchyshoe
      @butchyshoe 3 роки тому

      @Douglas Davis Don't appreciate you humor

  • @whydoesitmatter6923
    @whydoesitmatter6923 4 роки тому +2

    How is this a victory when we lost 242 and Japan lost 249

  • @Alex_Guy1011
    @Alex_Guy1011 4 роки тому +1

    Where can i find the soundtrack for Battle 360?

  • @patrickdavis99
    @patrickdavis99 4 роки тому

    Notice how only the victories are spoken about?

    • @ShockTheSystem
      @ShockTheSystem 2 роки тому

      In Jaws of the Enemy they showed when a Japanese force led by heavy cruiser Chokai ambushed and destroyed several US ships and an Australian ship so actually no. Granted it's a lot of US victories but Battle 360 isn't one sided. This here is only a small clip from one episode.

  • @eddybomber9559
    @eddybomber9559 4 роки тому +1

    You know this is actually movie style graphics

  • @mikesmith-wk7vy
    @mikesmith-wk7vy 3 роки тому

    i think we should have kept the battleships around, they upgraded the Missouri and it was relevant in desert storm , if nothing else just for the nostalgia of them and protecting the carriers

    • @richieThach
      @richieThach 3 роки тому

      They were older ships that were not worth it to refit. One of their biggest disadvantages were speed: the North Carolina and South Dakota class could only manage 28 knots, which new carriers could easily exceed. The ships were also not large enough to actually fit improved powerplants to keep them up to speed. The Iowa class, meanwhile could reach 33 knots so it was fast enough to escort carriers.

    • @mikesmith-wk7vy
      @mikesmith-wk7vy 3 роки тому

      @@richieThach yea the Missouri was an Iowa class so keeping those would have been nice

    • @richieThach
      @richieThach 3 роки тому

      @@mikesmith-wk7vyall four iowas were kept and are still alive today which is pretty nice

    • @gordonberry7284
      @gordonberry7284 3 роки тому +1

      Their only contribution would be as floating artillery which a modern destroyer or cruiser can easily undertake with cruise missiles. They would be massively expensive to operate, with thousands of sailors on board and would be vulnerable to air or missile attack. While not providing any great tactical advantage, they would be targeted by the enemy for the huge propaganda value in sinking one. And given that the US are reducing even Nuke Carrier numbers now due to their vulnerability to long range missiles, the last thing the navy would want is a battleship in the fleet. Especially as you could operate 5 or 6 much more versatile frigates for the same cost.

  • @steve0826
    @steve0826 4 роки тому

    It's CGI, the camera does not need to shake.

  • @EmersonSalmeron
    @EmersonSalmeron 4 роки тому +2

    Wait this isn’t pawn stars wtf

  • @drakefire6675
    @drakefire6675 3 роки тому

    The actual battle wasn't as one-sided as it appears here. Kirishima disabled South Dakota with a lucky hit, shorting out her electrical systems, and the US destroyer screen got fairly beat up as well.

    • @ayden6899
      @ayden6899 3 роки тому

      From what I heard was that South Dakota didn’t had a electrical failure not because of Kirishima, but it’s not like South Dakota got out of the battle unaffected, it was pounded by the Japanese cruisers

  • @davidnewland2556
    @davidnewland2556 3 роки тому

    Idontbelevethe tounds are lead

  • @mrbill2600
    @mrbill2600 4 роки тому +4

    "The History Guy" on UA-cam does a better job of explaining and making history exciting and interesting in any one of his 5-10-minute shows than "The History Channel" does in a month of their shows.
    And I'll bet his budget is a lot less.

  • @JohnRodriguesPhotographer
    @JohnRodriguesPhotographer 4 роки тому

    The quote from Admiral Willis "Ching" Lee is incorrect.

    • @ronnelson7828
      @ronnelson7828 3 роки тому +1

      "Tell your Big Boss "Ching" Lee is here!