Could Chinese military conquer Australia? (2019)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 жов 2019
  • This is the second and concluding part of our "Could China invade Australia" series. Check out the first part here: • Could Chinese navy and...
    Part two covers the details of Chinese landings on the Australian nearby islands as well as the mainland.
    Image used in video Credits:
    E7 Wedgetail by Eugene Butler [GFDL 1.2 (www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licen...) or GFDL 1.2 (www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licen...)]
    F18G Growler by U.S. Air Force photo by Tech. Sgt. Heather Redman [Public domain]
    ZBD-03 vehicle by Mil.ru [CC BY 4.0 (creativecommons.org/licenses/...)]
    072 landing ship by Mil.ru Ref. Id. : m02015083000020 [CC BY-SA 4.0 (creativecommons.org/licenses/...)]
    JH-7A with KG800 jammer pod by Chinese ministry of defense, via Chinese military Aviation blog
    Music by Matija Malatestinic
    www.malatestinic.com
    If you want to support us, become our Patron! / binkov
    Suggest country pairs you'd like to see in future videos over at our website: www.binkov.com
    You can also browse for other Binkov T-Shirts or Binkov merch, via the store at our website, binkov.com/
    Subscribe to Binkov's channel for more videos!
    / binkovsbattlegrounds
    Follow Binkov's news on Facebook!
    / binkovsbattlegrounds
    #Australia #China #invasion
    Get MagellanTV here: try.magellantv.com/binkovsbat...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 7 тис.

  • @wetcat833
    @wetcat833 4 роки тому +311

    Two Chinese soldiers meet two Australian soldiers. Chinese soldier says, "There are 1.5 billion of us and only 25 million of you". Dave says to Johnno, "Struth mate, where are we gonna bury 'em all?

    • @emrankazem3620
      @emrankazem3620 4 роки тому +5

      Bruh

    • @gato-grande
      @gato-grande 4 роки тому +7

      @@emrankazem3620 AUSTRALIA IS ASIA

    • @Danhawk1223
      @Danhawk1223 4 роки тому +46

      2 Chinese soldiers meet 2 Australian soldiers. Australian soldier says “mate do you feel like dying for some angry old man in an office a million miles away?” Chinese soldier says “No I have a wife and kids at home who want me back” Australian soldier says “come sit down and have a beer with me mate”.
      War is where young men go to die for angry old men.

    • @jliang70
      @jliang70 3 роки тому +5

      @@Danhawk1223 The only problem is there are not going to be any chinese soldier in australia.

    • @mr.m2659
      @mr.m2659 3 роки тому +6

      Two chinese soldiers meet two Australian soldiers, the chinese soldiers ask "why are you murdering unarmed afghani children?"

  • @M3au
    @M3au 4 роки тому +165

    If the Chinese tried to land on Christmas Island, they would be sent to Nauru.

    • @ronnycook3569
      @ronnycook3569 4 роки тому +12

      I can just see the far right pitching it as an immigration issue... "See? More foreigners arriving illegally in boats!"

    • @M3au
      @M3au 4 роки тому +7

      @@ronnycook3569 Far Right Fear = stupid person justification for Chinese invasion (not that they could ever achieve that). Well done Ron ..now, piss off to some country that I don't care about. I value Australia and I value being Australian … do you?

    • @ronnycook3569
      @ronnycook3569 4 роки тому +6

      @@M3au Yes, I do, which is why (1) I've found the treatment of so-called "boat people", as a stain on our country's reputation which has damaged our moral authority against countries such as China, to be shockingly against our usually generous national character; and (2) thought you were joking and tried to run with the joke. Y'know, Aussie sense of humour and all that.
      The idea of sending a Chinese invasion fleet, with ACTUAL illegal boat people, off to Nauru is pretty funny in my book.

    • @45641560456405640563
      @45641560456405640563 4 роки тому +7

      @@ronnycook3569 Wow Ron you triggered him good and proper by accident! I thought the comic aspect of your post bleeding obvious but apparently it wasn't to everyone....

    • @ronnycook3569
      @ronnycook3569 4 роки тому +2

      ​@@peterjohnson9291 So which one are you?
      As mentioned in an earlier comment, left and right are equally guilty on the support of the detention camps in Nauru, Manus Island and Christmas Island; in fact Labor introduced some of it. However, the far right are a lot noisier in their support. The "left" equivalent radio voices were a lot less stridently supportive.
      Anyway, feel free to put people in boxes all you want. You wouldn't want to think that other people have actual opinions formed from actual thought about actual facts. That might suggest that you have to consider their opinions.
      (Fortunately, the overseas detention camps are mostly shut down now. Mostly. Doesn't make their past existence less of a stain on the country.)

  • @didakpies
    @didakpies 4 роки тому +200

    The Chinese should definitely avoid any beach landings, due to that 90% of beach rescues in Australia are Chinese tourists,
    most are fully dressed and always exactly in the area's clearly marked as danger /no swimming zones.

    • @Jake00001
      @Jake00001 4 роки тому +9

      Even this discussion highlights the dangers of a multi polar world. Before world war ii it was a multi polar world and there were many wars. Only under the US leadership that we are safe to conduct business without worrying about a country like China trying to take over another country. US is not like China, has no interest in occupying a country - except if the country is perceived to be a danger to the international order(sometimes this perception may have gone wrong such as Iraq but the intention was not to occupy) Any more power to China is not good for the world.

    • @imbetterthanyouis
      @imbetterthanyouis 4 роки тому +13

      how else are we going to feed the sharks ?

    • @kaneanthony7724
      @kaneanthony7724 4 роки тому +3

      Haha yeah...

    • @alexpalmer776
      @alexpalmer776 3 роки тому +5

      We’re gonna have to train some more Bondi Life Guards

    • @bradleydavies4781
      @bradleydavies4781 3 роки тому +5

      Between the sharks , croc's and mosquitoes.

  • @CodeUK93
    @CodeUK93 3 роки тому +23

    Yo, Australia, I’m British and my BROTHERS (and sisters in the world) will always be US, AUS, NZ, Can etc. I will back any of you even if my country does not. Respect. Fr 🖤

    • @newsmansuper2925
      @newsmansuper2925 2 роки тому

      true you would, but you are like us being out populated by non whites in your country, I dont see them comming to fight here for any reason in the future

  • @Shameful.Display
    @Shameful.Display 4 роки тому +619

    You seem to be forgetting our substantial number of emus. They have proven themselves a formidible force in the great emu war.

    • @bossdog1480
      @bossdog1480 4 роки тому +33

      Don't forget the drop bears. Freakin' deadly.

    • @tidusffx1147
      @tidusffx1147 4 роки тому +24

      Yeah I still fear the emu more than the drop bear

    • @bossdog1480
      @bossdog1480 4 роки тому +17

      @@tidusffx1147 Unfortunately all too true. Lost several good men to the Emu.

    • @simsmaster6258
      @simsmaster6258 4 роки тому +11

      Nah emus make great cuisine for hungry soldiers.

    • @tamickajoy7606
      @tamickajoy7606 4 роки тому +20

      Yeah we’re all ready for China and any other country us and our wildlife. We know the land and wildlife unlike them! They wouldn’t know what hit them

  • @user46352
    @user46352 4 роки тому +83

    You forgot about Australian wildlife Special forces

    • @AuzzaB
      @AuzzaB 3 роки тому +2

      The drop bears, though numbers were decreased by the fires, will return quickly...

    • @tipofthespear7182
      @tipofthespear7182 3 роки тому +1

      Yeah don't tell em about the Drop Bears. Let em find out themselves . They'll be scared shitless ! 🇦🇺🇦🇺

    • @themadfootballfan1816
      @themadfootballfan1816 2 роки тому

      yes: we have koalas that will scratch their face of

  • @BeerGutGuy
    @BeerGutGuy 4 роки тому +55

    Japan landed troops west of Darwin during ww2, after travelling inland they realised there was nothing and left. If you'd like to land in Cape Capricorn you can, we'll leave you to make friends with the Crocs

    • @gone547
      @gone547 4 роки тому +4

      Don't forget the grey nomads.

    • @Slynsmiley
      @Slynsmiley 4 роки тому +3

      John Smith and Mick Taylor.

    • @deant3980
      @deant3980 3 роки тому

      And the locals

    • @wk9378
      @wk9378 3 роки тому

      Japan wanted to conquer and occupy. The Chinese will only practice scorched earth and will leave immediately before help arrives.

    • @HORNAYHAWK
      @HORNAYHAWK 2 роки тому

      I’ve heard about them getting smashed by crocs but never seen a vid saying it, so it’s definitely true if u know please?

  • @jcarlovitch
    @jcarlovitch 4 роки тому +159

    Been to over 48 countries while in the US Navy and Australia is one of the few I would gladly send my children to defend. That being said Europe you are on your own.

    • @gato-grande
      @gato-grande 4 роки тому

      @Darren Walsh AUSTRALIA IS ASIA

    • @snapper7277
      @snapper7277 4 роки тому +16

      Respect

    • @willyboy1752
      @willyboy1752 3 роки тому +21

      What a beautiful thing to say. Thank you on behalf of Australia. 🇺🇸🇦🇺

    • @bruhmoment-yt2zp
      @bruhmoment-yt2zp 3 роки тому +7

      Thanks mate

    • @willyboy1752
      @willyboy1752 3 роки тому +8

      @@bruhmoment-yt2zp honestly brought a tear to my eye mate. God bless and keep America.

  • @Spoons__
    @Spoons__ 4 роки тому +125

    So many comments about how this wouldn't happen. The whole point to this channel is to compare different nations directly based on their own assets on paper. They are not suppose to be reflective of real life scenarios, only the numbers and possible usage of said assets.

    • @jamesw17
      @jamesw17 4 роки тому +8

      This is true. I'm Australian and to me, it is obvious that if China - for some bizarre reason - declared total war on Australia, and nukes and allied intervention was off the table, China would eventually prevail. It is interesting to see how this might happen, what kinds of sacrifices both countries would be looking at and what kind of time frame would be involved. Hence the value of this match up.
      Of course nukes and allied interventions will never be off the table, and it would be never be politically feasible for the Chinese government to sustain the kinds of losses that would be required to conquer Australia. So it isn't going to happen. Duh. That was never the point.

    • @miroslavstefanov9196
      @miroslavstefanov9196 4 роки тому +1

      U never know what would happen because a lot of the weapons aren't tested in combat so they may turn to be successful or failure. Even the F35 isn't actually being tested against newest weapons and radars. And right now Israeli flying over Syria is helping Russia to observe those "stealth" jets flying there and they may be learning ways to counter them.
      But I bet that no one wants another major conflict, that's one thing I know for sure.

    • @cmscms123456
      @cmscms123456 4 роки тому +2

      @@miroslavstefanov9196 The Chinese military hasn't been tested either... China worries most about giving live ammo to its troops, as they might turn their weapons on the leadership.. This is why Chinese troops are rarely giving ammo inside their own country.

    • @miroslavstefanov9196
      @miroslavstefanov9196 4 роки тому +2

      @@cmscms123456 lol I'd do that in my own corrupt country

    • @jwzjwz2003cn
      @jwzjwz2003cn 4 роки тому +2

      Yeah, but when the topic like this lacks common sense, the discussion are just filled with hatred and ignorance. I don't mind a hypothetical standoff between a Chinese fleet and an Australian fleet. At least people will look at each country's naval assets and see what are the possible scenarios. Otherwise, it's just a nonsense. On paper, Australia alone can never win a total war against China even by conventional means. Also on paper, China can never truly conquer Australia by conventional means. I like the channel, but this episode is just bizarre. It's like asking if Chuck Norris can KO Dwayne Johnson if one decided to break in into another's house.

  • @robertmcphail4118
    @robertmcphail4118 3 роки тому +27

    We would NEVER let the Australian people fight alone.

    • @gato-grande
      @gato-grande 3 роки тому +1

      PANDA VERSUS KOALA

    • @davu5637
      @davu5637 2 роки тому

      Talk tough like Tony Abbott want to front shirt Plutin , When it come to face to face Abbott was scared like a girl

    • @thesilentkiller3320
      @thesilentkiller3320 2 роки тому

      Ya you bunch of pussies..

  • @andrewmccabe9820
    @andrewmccabe9820 4 роки тому +62

    If the fools land on Christmas Island they will be in detention,
    Processed and then deported.

  • @rosssmith4638
    @rosssmith4638 4 роки тому +57

    A few things to point out.
    1. For any nation (ie China) to invade Australia, the planning, and the logistics prior to departure would be incredible (you couldn’t miss it).
    2. The logistics during the invasion, you couldn’t keep it up.
    3. The terrain and animals that they would have to contend with is incredible (all the animals in Australia are out to kill you).
    4. Probably the most important and scary thing that they would have to confront would be the Australian Bogan.
    You just don’t piss off the Aussie Bogan.
    One Bogan would probably be worth about 100 US Navy SEALS.
    There’s a lot of Bogans in Australia.

    • @mushy111
      @mushy111 4 роки тому +15

      I'm picturing communist soldiers running from Shazza as she's throwing her xxxx can at them, screaming "ya f*%ckin dogs" 😅

    • @jamesmckenzie9551
      @jamesmckenzie9551 4 роки тому +9

      @@mushy111 I'll thong ya

    • @ex0duzz
      @ex0duzz 4 роки тому +3

      Ross Smith there's already more than one million ethnic Chinese in Australia as Aussie citizens or perm resident in population of 20ish million. China can just wait another decade or two and they would have bought and owned everything already anyway.

    • @fraznofire2508
      @fraznofire2508 3 роки тому +2

      Just airdrop thousands of funnel web spiders on the Chinese bases and we win

    • @RAAFLightning1
      @RAAFLightning1 3 роки тому +3

      can confirm bogans are mad

  • @TheCol111
    @TheCol111 4 роки тому +19

    8:21 the assessment here is wrong, Australia manufactures its own rifles and the ammunition we use for those rifles, and we dont lack in the resources needed to do so either.

    • @jasoar1563
      @jasoar1563 4 роки тому +2

      yeah with the 3 year timeline, i would assume there would be about 10 million soldiers with sufficient weapons and explosives. would put occupation right next to impossible

    • @chrisrabbitt
      @chrisrabbitt 4 роки тому +3

      Not just rifles and ammo for them but also tank and arty rounds among other party tricks.

  • @ryman8989
    @ryman8989 4 роки тому +12

    It's all fun and games until the Australians bust out their secret weapon, the Bob Semple tank 2.0

    • @Dhdh365
      @Dhdh365 4 роки тому +2

      😂😂😂😂...but dont you know its been upgraded? Its now carbon neutral. Deadlier than ever haha

    • @ryman8989
      @ryman8989 4 роки тому +2

      @@Dhdh365 shhhhhh.... that's the BS tank 2.1

    • @faisalalnasri7762
      @faisalalnasri7762 4 роки тому +1

      And even deadlier, big bob

  • @davidwyndham4671
    @davidwyndham4671 4 роки тому +62

    The only problem with your analysis (and it's a big one) is the vastness of the landscape and the terrain that would need to be conquered. Your map shows China capturing Cape York Peninsula. There's nothing there but jungled rainforest. Most of Australia is simply uninhabitable. China could take Christmas and the Cocos Islands but what could they launch attacks at from those islands? There is nothing there on the west coast except a few small towns. They'd be left in mostly waterless desert and could be easily picked off over time in hit and run sorties that would leave the Chinese devastated and Australians largely unharmed. On the northeast coast, large ships and landing craft would have difficulty getting close to the shore because of the Great Barrier Reef, which is 2000kms long. Your assertion that no more than 10% of Australians would join up to defend their country is also highly dubious. Australians are very patriotic and a direct assault on the homeland would see the majority of Australians join the direct war effort. Aside from 3 minor bombing and torpedo attacks by Japan during WWII, Australia's mainland has never been attacked. A direct attack would rouse the national spirit. Distance, terrain and the pure logistical nightmare would make a successful invasion of Australia by the Chinese very unlikely. The sheer size of the country and the lack of meaningful targets would make life very difficult for a Chinese invasion force. You really ought to research your scenarios a little more.

    • @peterharpas5877
      @peterharpas5877 3 роки тому +1

      There are so many communist spies in Australia including communist loving australian people and politicians we wouldn't stand a chance.

    • @travv88
      @travv88 3 роки тому

      @@peterharpas5877 totally agree. we are fkd bro. get out of the cities.

    • @davu5637
      @davu5637 2 роки тому

      Just one DF41 missiles is already too excessive to wipe out Australia. So you might get what you wished for.

  • @reaality3860
    @reaality3860 4 роки тому +28

    I know this scenario is "no allies" and therefore a waste of time. But in reality, a country is as powerful as its allies. Australia has some very powerful allies.

    • @davu5637
      @davu5637 2 роки тому

      Yanky will run away in the middle of a fight leaving Ozy to deal with China alone. The US only uses its allies to its advantage and after they have no more use, Ozy as an empty can will go in the trash!

    • @reaality3860
      @reaality3860 2 роки тому +1

      @@davu5637, The USA is the most powerful nation on Earth only because of its allies like Australia. President Biden won power through fraud. One bad apple doesn't spoil the whole bunch.

    • @davu5637
      @davu5637 2 роки тому

      @@reaality3860 Ha HA Ha !!! I totally admired your ignorant!!! Your country the global villain “America Has Been At War 93% of the Time - 222 Out of 239 Years - Since 1776“
      Most American and its puppets rightly believe that the U.S. military is the best and most formidable in the world. If that is correct, why, since the end of World War II, has the United States lost every war it started and failed every time it used force without just cause? Indeed, if the U.S. military was a sports team, it would land in the bottom divisions.
      The US and its puppets can't even bet the Vietnamese fighting in their pajamas and AK47 And or the T75k Taliban in twenty years and now run away in the middle of the night , let alone thinking of invading China who has already acquired nuclear capability.
      American activist and social media expert Jerry Day has called on the American nation to recognize the war crimes the U.S. government, military and corporate deep-state have committed in the Middle East and rest of the world. “They [U.S.] are simply bombing whatever they want to bomb, killing whoever they want to kill, destroying whatever they choose to destroy without legal grounds. We are the new global villain," said Day. www.yenisafak.com/en/video-gallery/news/us-is-new-global-villain-says-american-activist-2167332
      Ex-CIA director Pompeo: 'We lied, we cheated, we stole' ua-cam.com/video/DPt-zXn05acG/v-deo.htmlen.
      Wesley Clark, Democracy Now! interview, 2007
      ua-cam.com/video/bSL3JqorkdU/v-deo.html
      Broken Treaties
      ua-cam.com/video/uOeGTWYv8Hc/v-deo.html
      Only US and its puppet want to ruined China and Taiwan reunification. More than 90 countries expressed their support and understanding to China's stance and 65 of them clearly opposed interference with China's domestic affairs on its Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and Tibet Autonomous Region under the excuse of human rights.22 June 2021 2020 Edition: Which Countries Are For or Against China’s Xinjiang Policies? thediplomat.com/2020/10/2020-edition-which-countries-are-for-or-against-chinas-xinjiang-policies/
      Taliban Says It Sees China As A "Friend" Of Afghanistan: Report www.ndtv.com/world-news/taliban-says-it-sees-china-as-a-friend-of-afghanistan-report-2483783?fbclid=IwAR1esCbYVoOjK3Bbd0G6M4tfTqrYrvoakcE9wvXr5aacXaNoITnSyIl_7c4
      British researcher exposes Western propaganda against China ua-cam.com/video/y30SZSSzXRk/v-deo.html
      World Debt Clocks
      www.usdebtclock.org/world-debt-clock.html
      Have a taste of your fake democracy
      The Global Slavery Index 2018 estimates that on any given day in 2016 there were 403,000 people living in conditions of modern slavery in the United States, a prevalence of 1.3 victims of modern slavery for every thousand in the country.
      LOS ANGELES UNBELIEVABLE OUT OF CONTROL HOMELESS SLUMS | HOMELESS CRISIS IN AMERICA ua-cam.com/video/MQHKygOupwg/v-deo.html
      ua-cam.com/video/MQHKygOupwg/v-deo.html
      Hell On Earth in Los Angeles
      ua-cam.com/video/08GSVZPkaJw/v-deo.html
      Blaming China For US Poverty And The Broken American Dream
      ua-cam.com/video/e-E8Ex1bgmQ/v-deo.html
      The 10 States Where Homelessness is Out of Control and Beyond Repair
      ua-cam.com/video/adq1rlWFE4o/v-deo.html
      TOP 10 AMERICAN SLUMS - Exploring ghettos in the USA through Google Street V ua-cam.com/video/cDqk2AxvooIi/v-deo.htmlew
      [2020 Homelessness Documentary] The Wall: Raw Stories from the 2018 Minneapolis Homeless Camp ua-cam.com/video/hZMy7Q0U88I/v-deo.html
      ON THE STREETS -- a feature documentary on homelessness in L.A.
      ua-cam.com/video/WUsJcPc8g0A/v-deo.html
      Can California figure out a way to house its growing homeless population? ua-cam.com/video/5SoEPjQF7GY/v-deo.html
      A Tsunami Of Evictions Could Make 40 Million Americans Homeless ua-cam.com/video/puBdGsmnT8M/v-deo.html
      Philadelphia's Battle Against Opioids Takes Aim at Hard-Hit Neighborhood ua-cam.com/video/pKMxALUwxHg/v-deo.html
      The fentanyl drug epidemic in North America
      ua-cam.com/video/TtGpPhd-c7Q/v-deo.html
      Yahweh has bought back their evil upon them, He will destroy them in their wickedness. Yahweh our God will destroy them.- Psalm 94:23
      Evidence speaks🗣️ Covid19 originated in CIA Fort Detrick lab, brought to Wuhan to blame it on China! ua-cam.com/video/4JMRmuykV4k/v-deo.html&app=desktop
      Americans Debate: Should YOU Fear China? Real Talk China Ep 10
      ua-cam.com/video/BjZyCixoAlA/v-deo.html
      British researcher exposes Western propaganda against China
      ua-cam.com/video/y30SZSSzXRk/v-deo.html&t=26s
      American honours treaties with Germany but not American Indian treaties
      ua-cam.com/video/RCO-PnJzZZk/v-deo.html
      Chris Hedges | The HORRIFIC State of the American Empire
      ua-cam.com/video/VXYsGuBdzM4/v-deo.html
      Chris Hedges | How America Inspires VIOLENCE Around the World
      ua-cam.com/video/BUd0MVHfNzw/v-deo.html
      THE GREAT AMERICAN LIE
      ua-cam.com/video/MrKk8jCt7e8/v-deo.html
      THE AMERICAN DREAM IS OVER! Google Street View shows Los Angeles is becoming a slum!
      ua-cam.com/video/qL5OKNY1ye8/v-deo.html
      FAKE AMERICAN FREEDOM
      ua-cam.com/video/ZoGsuBm4LMs/v-deo.html
      11 REASONS WHY AMERICA IS NOT GREAT
      ua-cam.com/video/ieTGIDWwAoM/v-deo.html
      AMERICAN DECLINE - The Fall Of A Superpower
      ua-cam.com/video/scJR-8_rdk4/v-deo.html
      TOP 10 AMERICAN SLUMS - Exploring ghettos in the USA through Google Street View
      ua-cam.com/video/cDqk2AxvooI/v-deo.html
      THE AMERICAN DREAM IS OVER! Google Street View shows Los Angeles is becoming a slum!
      ua-cam.com/video/qL5OKNY1ye8/v-deo.html
      THE FALL OF THE AMERICAN SUPERPOWER
      ua-cam.com/video/UoQM2-E_ZW4/v-deo.html
      ON THE STREETS -- a feature documentary on homelessness in L.A.
      ua-cam.com/video/WUsJcPc8g0A/v-deo.html
      Carl Sagan Predicted The Mess 2021 Would Be 25 years Ago
      ua-cam.com/video/nGanLUnjoPI/v-deo.html

  • @laurencefuller8435
    @laurencefuller8435 4 роки тому +29

    Finally you can get authentic Chinese food in Perth.

  • @chico20m
    @chico20m 4 роки тому +20

    Just imagine the Chinese infantry confronting for first time the Emu Empire.

    • @MartinLeong25
      @MartinLeong25 4 роки тому +4

      @Max Smith they are walking tanks

  • @Fswiergul
    @Fswiergul 4 роки тому +44

    I believe the Australian Government and Emu's would set aside their past history and unite against the invading Chinese forces. Perhaps an agreement is reached the Emu's will receive a large track of land in the interior of the country to self govern after the war.
    The Emu's can act as a Quick Reaction Force while also patrolling the less hospitable parts of Australia thereby freeing up more Australian Defence Force(ADF) personal to protect urban areas. If China tries an airdrop of paratroopers the emu's can close in with their 30 mph(48.28kmh) speed and then use their knife like talons to try pick some of the paratroopers before they can group up and organize. The emu's would be primarily focused on harassing the troopers rather than outright killing them, using their natural speed and local knowledge of the terrain to perform quick hit and run ambushes. Upon seeing giant 6' birds slicing up their fellow soldiers, the Chinese will most likely began to panic and began shooting their weapons wildly. At this point the emu's should retreat and circle the troopers trying to get them to waste more ammo and supplies which will be will be hard for the troops to replace. Emu's can also swim, giving them more tactical flexibility and greater chance of surprise. Eventually the paratroopers will be burdened with more and more wounded thereby slowing down their advance to their objectives. At a certain point with supplies running low and the percentage of combat effective troops dropping to dangerous levels, they will be forced to hunker down and wait for resupply and reinforcements. At this point the ADF can send a task force to destroy/capture them. This is but one scenario where an Australian-Emu Alliance would be beneficial to both sides.

    • @Telenil
      @Telenil 4 роки тому +5

      I laughed way more than I should have xD

    • @aymonfoxc1442
      @aymonfoxc1442 3 роки тому +4

      This is the first realistic scenario I've seen all day!

    • @emu954
      @emu954 2 роки тому

      Holy crap. I wonder how long it took to write that message

  • @Murto84
    @Murto84 4 роки тому +36

    Interesting but doesnt take into account Australia's harsh geography at all.
    Most of the northwest and southern coast cant be landed on.
    The reef blocks navy on most of the east coast. Cargo ships that go to Australia have their crew replaced with Aussies who know how to navigate the reef.
    Mountain range hugs most of the east and north-west coast.
    The north is thick marshes and jungles that are impassible.

    • @deant3980
      @deant3980 3 роки тому +3

      If they landed anywhere north they would have big problems.

    • @anderms1234
      @anderms1234 3 роки тому

      What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone who liked this is now dumber for reading it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.... none of that is factually true, that said I do have a green jacket.

    • @13exxonp
      @13exxonp 3 роки тому +1

      @@anderms1234 please back this up with some evidence as what was stated in the original comment was pretty accurate

    • @thecatchtherelease8982
      @thecatchtherelease8982 3 роки тому +1

      @@anderms1234 waiting for the evidence? Because invading or attacking the western and or northern parts of Australia would be major loss of Chinese resources and this bloke also forgot if they where to try the eastern/south eastern side they would have to also fight the New Zealanders. If they where to to ever invade they would need to know our land especially our national parks like the Kosziosco and cathedral ranges, if they where to ever to win the war it would be at major coast of resources and that would take 3-6 years. But it’s would only take the our allies to aid us in less?
      The Chinese would never go to combat against Australia their smartest move would be a economic war as it’s basically already started.

    • @aymonfoxc1442
      @aymonfoxc1442 3 роки тому

      The Bite is also a pretty impossible approach; steep cliffs on the ocean front flanked by major infrastructure in WA & SA such as military bases, airports & sheltered peninsulas that will limit the size of vessels on approach.

  • @side-fish
    @side-fish 4 роки тому +16

    But Binkhov, you forgot to factor in the emus, and Australia could also enlist penguins from Australia-controlled Antartica.

  • @TheLiamster
    @TheLiamster 4 роки тому +49

    Australia has emus though. They would change the tide of the war.

    • @side-fish
      @side-fish 4 роки тому +8

      The Australians and emus set aside their differences against a larger foe.

    • @mr.hotpotato78
      @mr.hotpotato78 4 роки тому +1

      Lol emus cant do shit. Chinese will win easy!

    • @johnnymigouel7228
      @johnnymigouel7228 4 роки тому +7

      @@mr.hotpotato78 do you know what a joke is idiot?

    • @GNARGNARHEAD
      @GNARGNARHEAD 4 роки тому +7

      @@mr.hotpotato78 that's not true the mounted emu forces are formidable

    • @jwzjwz2003cn
      @jwzjwz2003cn 4 роки тому +3

      You do know Chinese eat everything right? {>

  • @beifeng7448
    @beifeng7448 3 роки тому +11

    Australian army during a battle be like: No hat no play 🤣🤣🤣

  • @kevindunn5078
    @kevindunn5078 4 роки тому +131

    One Australian woman could beat up 10 Chinese men

    • @EroticOnion23
      @EroticOnion23 4 роки тому +7

      Dude, they can barely get up from their scooter...

    • @gato-grande
      @gato-grande 4 роки тому +1

      @@EroticOnion23 AUSTRALIA IS ASIA

    • @brianisme6498
      @brianisme6498 4 роки тому +19

      And one emu can beat up 30 Aussie woman

    • @fookeemak9356
      @fookeemak9356 4 роки тому +6

      In Sarawak, Malaysia.... one 'Bujang Senang' croc can snap & wrestle with 5- Chinese way-farers and pull their corpses into a riverine hide-outs....!!! 😜🐊🐊
      Majulah Sarawak & industrialising Malaysia....!!! 🔨🔨🐊🐊

    • @patriot1724
      @patriot1724 4 роки тому +12

      If ur talking about farmer women yah I believe that any Aussie man or woman could take down Chinese easily

  • @JerichoYeet
    @JerichoYeet 4 роки тому +58

    China: You can't defeat me.
    Australia: I know, but they can.
    Emus burst out of the bushes with malicious glows in their eyes.

    • @MartinLeong25
      @MartinLeong25 4 роки тому +5

      You mean birds that can still run just as fast even if you blasted them with a few bullets

    • @SynReaper9mm
      @SynReaper9mm 4 роки тому +2

      @@MartinLeong25 we found out they can the hard way. They also have the "Bone Berets" (Cassowaries). They are like a dozen Dolph Lundgren's bred with One Chuck Norris (Sorry, I don't want to scare them too much)...

    • @Slynsmiley
      @Slynsmiley 4 роки тому +2

      Grym Reaper Cassowaries?! Fuck man, these creatures deserve their own horror movie genre. They could disembowel you in a split second with those feet!

    • @alexpalmer776
      @alexpalmer776 3 роки тому +1

      @@Slynsmiley scary those feet and long nails are worse thing I’ve seen .. even the mother in-law does have toe nails that distorted

  • @kayseek1248
    @kayseek1248 4 роки тому +17

    Binkov: what if the Chinese invaded Australia?
    Me: **Tomorrow When the War Began flashbacks**

  • @nanochad2979
    @nanochad2979 3 роки тому +30

    Give me two australian divisions and i will conquer the world
    -Erwin Rommel

    • @nanochad2979
      @nanochad2979 3 роки тому +5

      @Roy Bevan and the evidence that it's a lie?

    • @amireyvazi9251
      @amireyvazi9251 3 роки тому

      @@nanochad2979 bruh you're claiming someone has said something so you should present an evidence LMAO

    • @RAAFLightning1
      @RAAFLightning1 3 роки тому +1

      @Roy Bevan and assuming you are american... thats funny because you guys have lost countless wars but you never seem to mention them....

    • @13exxonp
      @13exxonp 3 роки тому

      @Roy Bevan what do you mean he wouldn’t betray his own? He was caught organising an assassination on his leader!

    • @beifeng7448
      @beifeng7448 3 роки тому

      @@nanochad2979 Australians where the Germans enemy, why would Rommel complement his enemy, they where at war

  • @lythsian
    @lythsian 3 роки тому +12

    Chinese troops might land in Australia but they'll never get through customs.

    • @Shilo-fc3xm
      @Shilo-fc3xm 3 роки тому +2

      Of course they won't.
      Particularly since no Chinese person ever can pass through Australian customs without trying to hide a packet of fried fuckin crickets or cat meat.

  • @han1218
    @han1218 4 роки тому +14

    You forgot Australia's 50 million kangaroo population, most of which are fierce fighters, attacking with their bare hands.

  • @goodshipkaraboudjan
    @goodshipkaraboudjan 4 роки тому +11

    Also Binkov - the F88 and F90 rifles the ADF use are manufactured here in Australia, not imported.

  • @aryavishwanathan4662
    @aryavishwanathan4662 3 роки тому +7

    You just forgot the QUAD, you have to go through 1.3 billion Indians before China conquer our Aussie brothers.

    • @wanglu4849
      @wanglu4849 3 роки тому

      have you seen the map of the World , those 1.3 billion indians are on the border with pakistan near Kashmir and wont be leaving there base no matter what happens. The indian navy is 3 times smaller then china and far from the east coast of Australia. the Australian navy is about equal to 35% of indian navy power so even India plus Austraia you have a navy equal to 40% of china - still no where near enough. that 40% is today by 2030 that will become just 24% of chinese navy power.... china is building 10 plus navy ships every year completed , Australia is building NONE right now , numbers will increase by 2 by 2030 what china does in 4 months. be realistic and im not on china side one bit.

    • @jamescpalmer
      @jamescpalmer 3 роки тому

      @@wanglu4849 Actually India's state of internal unrest will be nothing compared the the full out civil war that would happen inside China if they sent their military overseas. China will never invade anyone again, they're too afraid of their own citizens. Same thing happened with the soviet union, they will never invade anyone, they need every solider to repress their own population who hate their government.

  • @jqbogus
    @jqbogus 4 роки тому +10

    "No outside interference" is a pretty big favour for the Chinese.
    Australia has a LOT of allies, while China really doesn't.

  • @atommanmoab251
    @atommanmoab251 4 роки тому +27

    The Australian wildlife will wipe out the Chinese invasion. The Emu commando brigade is always ready.

    • @raymond19870510
      @raymond19870510 4 роки тому +3

      No, we Cantonese will eat it All.
      No single kangaroo can jump out my Dish.

    • @mattfromwiisports2468
      @mattfromwiisports2468 4 роки тому +3

      @@raymond19870510 well the 30 foot spiders knights will make sure you don't jump out their plate

    • @alexpalmer776
      @alexpalmer776 3 роки тому +2

      @Adolf Hitler they bread faster than Chinese

    • @oceanbreeze6812
      @oceanbreeze6812 2 роки тому

      He never mentioned the eastern brown, king brown, death adder, tiger and taipan divisions. With minor support from the redbelly and copperhead regiments.

  • @RandomStuff-he7lu
    @RandomStuff-he7lu 4 роки тому +10

    Australia managed 14% mobilisation during WW2.

    • @strangenameforaband342
      @strangenameforaband342 4 роки тому +1

      Australia had a white Australia policy then and the government was more focused on being British. But now Australia has a brown Australia policy so you wouldn't expect as many white Australians joining in the defense. So you have less whites wanting to defend Australia and the brown Australians with the constant media coverage how racist Australia is wouldn't want to defend Australia either. Not good but what would I know I'm white man with differing opinions from the mainstream.

    • @sniper.93c14
      @sniper.93c14 4 роки тому

      Strange Name For A Band I think you really under estimate the lengths people will go to to defend their homes and families

    • @strangenameforaband342
      @strangenameforaband342 4 роки тому

      Sniper
      The problem is if white Australians have no future under the current government or Chinese rule why would they fight the Chinese? There is no stated end plan for mass immigration to Australia and many white Australians are coming to that realization. So why die for either what is in it for them?

    • @miiiiiiiiiiick
      @miiiiiiiiiiick 4 роки тому +2

      @@strangenameforaband342 Don't get what you're talking about. Many of the people that now live here have fled from regime's like China's. Why do you think they would now just give up on the idea of freedom?

    • @strangenameforaband342
      @strangenameforaband342 4 роки тому

      @@miiiiiiiiiiick
      The original post was about 14% mobilization I was talking about the governmential and demographic change that has happened since then. Maybe some guys would fight for the government we have now but a lot of the original Australians wouldn't. Sure you may get some guys who fled countries like China that would fight them but white Australians are fd either way so it wouldn't be in their interest to.

  • @enanny0616
    @enanny0616 2 роки тому +7

    The fact that this is hypothetical and without allies, australia did much better than I would’ve thought

  • @chomes8048
    @chomes8048 3 роки тому +8

    Update: Australia now has AGM-158C Long Range Anti-Ship Missiles with 550km range that can be used on the F/A- 18F Super Hornets. We have also just purchased Evolved Sea Sparrow Block 2 long range anti ship missiles for use in the navy, with 370km anti ship and air and 1,500km range land strike range.
    Nice to know that the Australian government is preparing for all situations :)

  • @daveselby9862
    @daveselby9862 4 роки тому +50

    Two words: Drop. Bears.

    • @resiefan3258
      @resiefan3258 3 роки тому

      Fake!!!

    • @Hyperstorm-es4yq
      @Hyperstorm-es4yq 3 роки тому

      @@resiefan3258 do you know what a joke is

    • @liamellis9710
      @liamellis9710 3 роки тому +1

      I wouldn't be so sure chief, I lost my younger cousin to one they didn't leave much of him behind.

  • @jup1ter_f1ve
    @jup1ter_f1ve 4 роки тому +14

    WE GOTTA ARM THE EMU'S AND KANGAROOS WITH AK-47'S

    • @gasmaskedbassist1538
      @gasmaskedbassist1538 4 роки тому

      Well I told myself I'd go to Australia. But now that the Kangaroos and Emus have AK's, I'm out

    • @southernstars2481
      @southernstars2481 4 роки тому

      Get Beto to ship over A R 1 5 ' s 👍

  • @thomasbarker8214
    @thomasbarker8214 3 роки тому +19

    For all the AUSSIES out there - just imagine China landing in the far north.... The Spiders, The Crocs, The Snakes, The Rain Forrest, The locals! and thats just landing! imagine the march south!? LOL

    • @nanochad2979
      @nanochad2979 3 роки тому

      Australia isn't that bad, I live there

    • @thomasbarker8214
      @thomasbarker8214 3 роки тому

      @@nanochad2979 same

    • @nanochad2979
      @nanochad2979 3 роки тому

      @Its Svper same

    • @tenpercentfordabigguy8550
      @tenpercentfordabigguy8550 3 роки тому

      Darwin is where the teeth of our Army to the north is as well as having American troops stationed there. You can say ,no interference , but if you start bombing US troops there wouldn't be much of a choice .

    • @deant3980
      @deant3980 3 роки тому

      You SA boys need to go check out far north Qld.

  • @philliangbeihai5388
    @philliangbeihai5388 4 роки тому +57

    Have you seen how Chinese people drive cars, their boats will be banged up before getting to Australia 😁

    • @holyboxer2.072
      @holyboxer2.072 3 роки тому +1

      racist
      Have you ever seen an Australian do math?
      The Australian will miscalculated the parameters of the guns

    • @YoshiHunt
      @YoshiHunt 3 роки тому +1

      @@holyboxer2.072 woah calm down Jamal it's only a joke

    • @RAAFLightning1
      @RAAFLightning1 3 роки тому

      @@holyboxer2.072 have you seen australian people, they are about twice the size of you. Oh wait you cant see!

    • @RAAFLightning1
      @RAAFLightning1 3 роки тому

      @Holy Boxer 2.0 also you did your grammar completely wrong, it should be: *Australians will miscalculate the parametres of the guns ;)*

    • @holyboxer2.072
      @holyboxer2.072 3 роки тому

      @@RAAFLightning1 wow ,So you're saying that Australians are 12 feet tall or 170kg weight?
      Well,It's true that many Australians weigh 170 kg. They even have to take two seats to sit on the bus!
      And these overweight, clumsy people may even need a calculator to calculate 7×9, and you may be one of these people.

  • @james_aurora
    @james_aurora 4 роки тому +7

    My grandfather was an indonesia national army.. he said China will conquer every ASEAN countries in one day.. except vietnam in 3 days, indonesia in 5 days.. and Australia in 7-15 days.
    If America and allies join the battle, the prediction will be different.

  • @callumjoyce1712
    @callumjoyce1712 4 роки тому +18

    It's mathematically impossible for Australia to win in conventional warfare. That's why historically the Australian army has trained in and fought delaying actions, ambushes and fighting withdrawals. Thanks to the Army's experience in the Pacific in WW2, Malaya and Borneo, and Vietnam among others, the ADF is no stranger to unconventional warfare. China would eventually achieve their goals but at a great cost.

    • @lesliegrayson1722
      @lesliegrayson1722 4 роки тому

      yeah Thermopylae. Alexander the great takes Persia. Platea in Boeotia. 3 platoons at Long tan against 10,000. 40 men in containers operating drones against 300,000 ISIS.
      One Stealth plane flys over Israel for two weeks before finally the kuwaiti newspaper tells the IRANIAN Imam that the S400 system radar is on but nobody's home right before the general is sacked and Iran seeks denuclearisation talks with France again.. this year.. Australia has these Drones and planes too... So maybe Australia needs 200 men in containers to swat these invaders... your math needs a bit of... adjustment just based on your not keeping up with current events. 85% of all MODERN MILITARY arms are owned by the US and its Allies.

    • @callumjoyce1712
      @callumjoyce1712 4 роки тому +1

      @@lesliegrayson1722 I didn't say we wouldn't give them hell, but you can't honestly believe that we can outlast the world's 2nd largest economy and 1st largest population in a war of attrition.
      I'd be up there with you in the bush until the bitter end, but that doesn't mean we should ignore the facts.

    • @arad9386
      @arad9386 4 роки тому +2

      ​@@lesliegrayson1722 LOL lay off the crack pipe, mate. You can't mention ancient wars which are notorious for having greatly exaggerated standing army figures; and the others mentioned are just engagements. Obviously Australia could win a battle or two but there is a 0% chance of Australia defeating China in a war, simply by their sheer number

    • @lesliegrayson1722
      @lesliegrayson1722 4 роки тому

      @@callumjoyce1712 our economy is similar to the Russian economy, China has not enjoyed this 2nd economy for as long as we have ours. 85% of all MODERN military arms are owned by the US and its Allies, we are and Ally. Lately Israel flew its Stealth F 35 over Iran, the local Iranian Imam read in a kuwaiti newspaper about it and then sacked the general and restarted denuclearization talks with France. India was on patrol and saw the top Chinese Stealth fighter with their 4th gen radar.. I'm guessing that if the F 35 can see 4th gen then they can also use their Stealth radar to see a plane that is 4th gen too.. and mop up any fighters, and ships long range before they are in range themselves - that's what they were made for.. As for anyone landing well that's just their own fault... for not keeping up with current events... the Mighty drop bears will get them all and eat their 2min noodles..

    • @lesliegrayson1722
      @lesliegrayson1722 4 роки тому

      @@arad9386 Israel is surrounded by 57 countries who want to destroy them... Mr Rad I must be talking with a man who knows little about current events coz Israel flew its F 35 stealth plane over Iran and its S400 anti air missiles for two weeks.. and China has no anti stealth radar on its ships and may have a quantum radar in china but really it will take up to 15 years or more to miniaturise that shite.. Plus India saw their "top/best" Stealth plane with a 4th gen radar..
      So to summarise they have no ships no planes that can shoot down our planes so they have no ships and no planes and no personnel coming over to be cut up by our mighty drop bears.. rad huh!!! are we good?

  • @forgivemenot1
    @forgivemenot1 3 роки тому +20

    This scenario seems to hinge on some questionable tactics, firstly any invasion force would be subject to long range stand off air attack long before it got near to Australia as well as submarine attack, I also highly doubt the Australian Navy would try to directly confront the PLAN and would either be used to escort supply ships or harass Chinese supply ships which in this scenario is their Achilles heel.
    I also doubt the Australian Army would even try to spread itself thin trying to cover the entire coast or even try and oppose a landing, while it's conventional wisdom to try and stop the enemy on the beach because that's when it's most vulnerable the fact the Chinese could pick anywhere renders that a moot point so the the army would most likely deploy in mass in places they don't want the Chinese to invade by making those places too heavily defended to touch.
    The ideal Australian tactic would be to convince the Chinese to invade the north by leaving it relatively undefended; while that would give them a foothold it would be a disadvantageous one, the north doesn't have a lot of infrastructure such as good roads and there's really only one good highway from north to south and the Chinese would have to use a significant part of it's military to secure it, the ADF would most likely use asymmetrical warfare for the most part with hit and run tactics as well as scorch and burn to deny any local supply, by focusing on Chinese logistics rather than on the main force the ADF could render any major landing force quickly combat ineffective, and the larger the force the faster it'll chew through supplies like fuel which it will use a lot of just to travel the distances involved.
    With a fully mobilized population we could bog down a significantly larger force and quite frankly time isn't on China's side in an invasion because the longer it took to take Australia the higher the casualties it would take and the more prepared and entrenched the key objectives would become.

  • @weebaboo4032
    @weebaboo4032 4 роки тому +8

    I think he’s kinda forgetting Australia is a literal DESERT and the coast is full jungle and us Aussies have better experience there, soooooo

  • @matthewlee8667
    @matthewlee8667 4 роки тому +10

    China has to move now before oceania rolls out the Bob Semple Mk. VII. It has a top speed at the speed of light and it's equipped with 2000 machine guns and 800 cannons. It's armor is completely impenetrable and it's also able to fly

    • @CrappyScrap
      @CrappyScrap 4 роки тому +1

      This comment made my day.

  • @NickPoeschek
    @NickPoeschek 4 роки тому +13

    I’ve met a few Australians, I imagine the Chinese would beat a hasty retreat when they met a bunch of angry Aussies on the beaches with bats calling them c-ts.

    • @mysteriousguy2362
      @mysteriousguy2362 4 роки тому

      😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂

    • @not_suspicious
      @not_suspicious 4 роки тому

      mysterious guy won’t mean shit when the troops have fucking guns, your badass aussie friends would be shot down

    • @The_Desert_Tiger
      @The_Desert_Tiger 4 роки тому +1

      @@not_suspicious Chinese guns are made in China so they are unlikely to work.

    • @hanhan2360
      @hanhan2360 4 роки тому

      You mean mates?

  • @georgeswanson697
    @georgeswanson697 Рік тому +9

    Why would the owners of Australia suddenly wanna conquer it?

    • @riezan
      @riezan Рік тому +1

      How bad is it? Are the Chinese own many vital infrastructures in Oz?

    • @riezan
      @riezan Рік тому

      @cucumbercat4522 👌

    • @Themonkeymafia06
      @Themonkeymafia06 11 місяців тому

      We shouldn't trade with the commies

  • @felliceteii6944
    @felliceteii6944 3 роки тому +10

    The sad reality is, it is expected that in the next 5-10 years Australia could be in a conflict with china, as an Australian, it is a truly scary reality, but i say we face them and fight them, "we shall defend our island, whatever the cost may be!" - Sir Winston Spencer Churchill

    • @tobieprentice662
      @tobieprentice662 3 роки тому +1

      just saw it on the news, im looking at everything on the internet about it. keeps safe everyone

    • @davu5637
      @davu5637 2 роки тому +1

      Yes but the outdated OZ 120 billion sub is not ready until 15-20 years time, how can we fight them in 5-10 years???

    • @aldisozols2522
      @aldisozols2522 2 роки тому

      @@davu5637 The submarines are only one part of the equation. The older Collins class are still pretty good.
      The Air Force is up to date with F-3fs, Growlers and LRASMs. The surface Navy is growing.
      I think we should still spend more on armaments.

    • @davu5637
      @davu5637 2 роки тому

      @@aldisozols2522 Ozy Ships navigate by puppets not by real navy. US, Ozy ,NZ ect... can't even beat the Vietnamese fighting in their pajamas with AK47 and run away from Afghanistan the idle of the night alone fighting China.
      China's New Radar technology mark the end of the US’ stealth dominance.
      ua-cam.com/video/q_s8E7LWTjY/v-deo.html
      CHINA INTIMIDATES WITH DF-21D ANTI-SHIP BALLISTIC MISSILE TEST !
      ua-cam.com/video/BIxEawGbiH0/v-deo.html
      What is the US strongest bomb?
      B83
      The B83 is a variable-yield thermonuclear gravity bomb developed by the United States in the late 1970s and entered service in 1983. With a maximum yield of 1.2 megatons (5.0 PJ), it is the most powerful nuclear weapon in the United States nuclear arsenal. It was designed by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
      On 17 June 1967, the People's Republic of China conducted its first thermonuclear test, commended 'Test No. 6'. The explosion took place in the atmosphere over the Lop Nor Test Site, in the northwest of the country, with a yield of 3.3 megatons. Today China nuclear bomb is 600 times stronger than the one dropped in Japan.
      How Did An F-35 Fighter Jet Vanish?
      ua-cam.com/video/tefUJMCw2uI/v-deo.html
      F-35 Collides with Another Plane
      ua-cam.com/video/mKOZYlHm78g/v-deo.html
      F 117 Accident
      14 Sep 1997 Martin State Airport Air show
      Baltimore Maryland
      ua-cam.com/video/PlYGcllJAmI/v-deo.html
      X31 How One Sensor Destroyed a Super Plane ua-cam.com/video/6lCun3GUNdo/v-deo.html
      ua-cam.com/video/6lCun3GUNdo/v-deo.html
      Vanished stealth fighter jet is a mystery
      ua-cam.com/video/wQjXH3d_4CE/v-deo.html
      F-35 - Runaway Fighter - the fifth estate
      ua-cam.com/video/RwA4RaaJSeI/v-deo.html
      Wreckage of crashed Japanese F-35 fighter jet found
      ua-cam.com/video/vxHatsMw63M/v-deo.html
      The F-35 Fighter Jet Has a New Capability: Shooting Itself
      ua-cam.com/video/Zr51_sRkTkM/v-deo.html
      TOP JET CRASHES COMPILATION 2017 Top 10 Fighter Jet Crashesua-cam.com/video/xKsUlqENO1Q/v-deo.html
      Big Setback For US.' Lockheed Martin As Japanese F-35 fighter Jet
      Crashesua-cam.com/video/ypAWKUVCQ1E/v-deo.html
      Russian Missile-Miss Hit an F-35 Stealth Fighters
      ua-cam.com/video/fk2ljSryWTk/v-deo.html
      F-35 fighter jet crashes at Eglin Air Force Base five days after F-22 crashed ua-cam.com/users/results?search_query=F35+MISSING
      The Real Reason The F-35 Isn't Ready for War
      ua-cam.com/video/xjLp78wPBzY/v-deo.html
      Is the USAF Fed Up With The F-35?
      ua-cam.com/video/lvSh8Lcz3bk/v-deo.html
      F-35 really a Trillion Dollar Disaster | Why F-35 failed to deliver?ua-cam.com/video/jBkEzhM_8e0/v-deo.html
      F 35 ducted fan jet missing left back wing - pilot Higino Oguro
      ua-cam.com/users/results?search_query=F35+MISSING
      US officials deny reports that missing Japanese F-35 is foundua-cam.com/video/MhqfvkPke-c/v-deo.html
      F-35 fighter jets suffering from multiple issues, report finds ua-cam.com/video/F7OuIo6SapY/v-deo.html
      Marine -35 jet crashes in California after clipping wings mid-air with refueling planeua-cam.com/video/WDVlz50d0mk/v-deo.html
      Taiwan F-35 Jets collide by chines Jamer J-16 Jets Pilots missing China big victory over Americanua-cam.com/video/8ZIiH4dC2vw/v-deo.html
      Why Germany Doesn't Buy the F-35

  • @joestar5629
    @joestar5629 4 роки тому +33

    *China invades Australia easily*
    America: “Hold my beer....”
    Edit: tysm for the likes and comments!

    • @99hockeynhl
      @99hockeynhl 4 роки тому +18

      @sti system China Invades Australia
      United States: "Hold my beer..."
      United Kingdom: "Hold our tea Chaps"
      Canada: "Hold my stick for a sec bud, sorry eh?"
      Austria: "Wrong country pal"
      New Zealand: "Confused and scared kiwi noises"
      Australian Wildlife: "More victims ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)"

    • @99hockeynhl
      @99hockeynhl 4 роки тому +2

      @Random Person Random Civilian: "haha, i'm in danger"

    • @hairy-dairyman
      @hairy-dairyman 4 роки тому +1

      @@99hockeynhl some of the toughest people I've ever met are kewe. Don't count em out

    • @wonderings0ul
      @wonderings0ul 4 роки тому +1

      America can't stop China with just technology and weapons
      A billion plus POPULATION
      If a American soldiers kills 2 Chinese before going down
      1 American= 2 Chinese
      It is still not enough for America to defeat china
      You need man power to do it
      If u have 100 advanced weapons but 30 man to use it
      70 will be a waste
      That's where u need man power
      Sad reality for India and south Asia
      A billion plus population to fight a billion plus population

    • @lesliegrayson1722
      @lesliegrayson1722 4 роки тому +3

      New Zealand : "Hold my Keg... nobody steals our ozzie rugby punching bag"
      Japan: "Hold my bloody Sake.. some MuddaFugga just stopped our coal coming in from Australia"
      UK, France, Canada, Germany, USA step in: "Japan, New Zealand sit down in our pub, keep the beer flowing for us... we have over US$700trillion invested in Australia.. we got this one"

  • @blueknight8700
    @blueknight8700 4 роки тому +8

    Australia has the best Armoured Fighting Veicule anyone can hope for.
    The Emu

  • @shermanator87
    @shermanator87 4 роки тому +18

    Australia and Indonesia have this weird alliance that sometimes comes upone itself. But together against anyone we would at least hold strong. We would together, if need be, hold strong and annihilate our joint enemy.

    • @inaaronshead7331
      @inaaronshead7331 4 роки тому +3

      we have Indonesia whom loathes China, we have NZ.. PNG are allies directly.
      China is piss poorly trained and fails in military exercises that favours it..
      we'd slaughter china in ratio 2,000 to 1 easily.

    • @kaneanthony7724
      @kaneanthony7724 4 роки тому +1

      So true. Indonesia and Australia will always have this uncomfortable relationship.
      We both see each other as a potential threat and Ally simultaneously.
      As things stand at the moment I'd say we are better placed being an Ally.

    • @inaaronshead7331
      @inaaronshead7331 4 роки тому +2

      @@kaneanthony7724 I think we're comfortable with each other.. which will have to do for now.
      They like us for tourism and we like the to go visit.
      I think personally we should strengthen our ties and relations with Indonesia.

    • @kaneanthony7724
      @kaneanthony7724 4 роки тому +1

      @@inaaronshead7331 Agreed 👍

    • @kaneanthony7724
      @kaneanthony7724 4 роки тому +2

      @@inaaronshead7331 An Alliance between Australia and Indonesia has interesting potential.
      With Australia providing support behind Indonesia that could prevent any foreign power extending their sphere of influence into our region.
      I'm sure that suits us and I'm guessing it may also suit the Indonesians.

  • @hresoldier.9695
    @hresoldier.9695 3 роки тому +8

    Just remember the performance of Australian soldiers in WW2 when they weren't fighting for our home land.

  • @zeknight4352
    @zeknight4352 4 роки тому +9

    Support Australia from America

  • @falcon3431
    @falcon3431 4 роки тому +27

    "Give me two Australian divisions and I will conquer the world for you." - Erwin Rommel. German Field Marshall in Command of the Afrika Korps during the Siege of Tobruk 1941

    • @nathanashley2693
      @nathanashley2693 4 роки тому +2

      Rommel never said that.... it's a myth

    • @RAAFLightning1
      @RAAFLightning1 3 роки тому

      @@nathanashley2693 and you know that how?

    • @cloggedcp6961
      @cloggedcp6961 3 роки тому

      @@RAAFLightning1 because its a good story

    • @beifeng7448
      @beifeng7448 3 роки тому

      @@RAAFLightning1 why would Rommel complement his enemy? Sounds like cap 🧢 to me

    • @davu5637
      @davu5637 2 роки тому

      Most American and its puppets rightly believe that the U.S. military is the best and most formidable in the world. If that is correct, why, since the end of World War II, has the United States lost every war it started and failed every time it used force without just cause? Indeed, if the U.S. military was a sports team, it would land in the bottom divisions.
      The US and its puppets can't even bet the Taliban in twenty years and now run away, let alone thinking of invading China who has already acquired nuclear capability.

  • @daweedabest2085
    @daweedabest2085 3 роки тому +10

    Nah Australia is good, the Chinese soldiers would drop their weapons due to not being adapted to fight upside down.

  • @Thechist781
    @Thechist781 Рік тому +8

    The thing may be a lot of people haven’t realised is that they invaded already. They own land, properties and many assets here and everything without shooting a single bullet 😊

    • @fren183
      @fren183 Рік тому +1

      Americans and Bitish own way more than Chinese.

  • @XkriskrossX
    @XkriskrossX 4 роки тому +18

    Chinese landing parties won't be able to withstand the Aussie's highly-trained emu special forces

  • @Roland14d
    @Roland14d 4 роки тому +14

    Other factors to consider:
    01. Australian military has far more combat experience and quality of training. In addition, they train with the US which has even more combat experience and quality of training.
    - PRC hasn't engaged in significant combat operations since the debacle in Vietnam back in '79. Even the occasional incursions into India have been small and insubstantial.
    - High possibility in theater PLAAF will cease to exist rather quickly.
    02. The PRC has a large potential Fifth Column in AU. Many ChiComs have immigrated to AU and hold positions of power in Government & Universities.
    - AU has disarmed it's citizenry. Fewer recruits will have firearms experience thus increasing training time. No opportunity for large militia/partisans to counter fifth column/occupation forces.
    03. AUs weapons/equipment based in US/EU designs. PRC makes copies of Russian equipment.
    04. PRC is the invader morale will not hold as long as the democratic defenders.
    05. An invasion of this magnitude leaves Western China vulnerable to rebellion.
    -Thanks to the One Child Rule, PLA will not have as many potential troops often believed.
    -Additionally, a population with so few heirs will be less tolerant of high casualties. On the other hand, AU has a higher percentage of potential troops. Additional troops could come from waves of immigrants.
    While potentially substantial, these factors are "squishy" so BB wisely excluded them from this hypothetical.

    • @Jetwolf
      @Jetwolf 4 роки тому +3

      These are all really valid points, I concur.

    • @333Tonberry
      @333Tonberry 4 роки тому +5

      You also forgot that much of the possible landing areas are dangerous beaches (reef's and strong tides) or are just in the middle of nowhere or go straight onto a desert. The logistics requirements for food and water alone would quickly stretch supply lines. Not to mention it is very harsh terrain which the ADF train in and the Chinese do not.
      Not to mention that Australia could probably reactivate some currently defunct and mothballed manufacturing capability which can be used to produce new military hardware.

    • @Jetwolf
      @Jetwolf 4 роки тому

      @Nick Bennett haha, it's like in Scooby Doo - where they all pull off their masks and we see the REAL infiltrators!! X-D

  • @nicholas1254
    @nicholas1254 3 роки тому +9

    Unless you've been here you can't understand that it would be easier to invade the Fallout Universe.
    In such a war, man is not your enemy, The Heat and Fresh Water are.

  • @wetcat833
    @wetcat833 4 роки тому +7

    One major flaw in the 2 videos is that Australia at the out break of hostilities would put 100% effort in destroying the Chinese aircraft carrier. This task, with Australian Assets at this stage being at full capacity, would be relatively easy and with plenty of time and opportunity before the carrier reached the theatre. The carrier must be regarded as sunk. The rest of how this war is fought is now thrown into question.

    • @chrisb3635
      @chrisb3635 4 роки тому +4

      Not to mention the fact the Australia F-18 Super Hornets are now equipped with the most advanced anti ship missile (350 in total) in the world and are the only country on the planet the USA have exported it to. It has an autonomous range of 500km's on top of the the 3,300km range of the Super Hornets. They can carry two per plane. The Super Hornet fleet could sink the entire Chinese carrier group before it even reached Papua New Guinea, let alone the 2 x carriers.

  • @harbringerf9416
    @harbringerf9416 4 роки тому +9

    Australia actually manufactures small arms - though it isn't clear if this could be ramped up. The BAE hawk is licensed locally, mostly for servicing Asian hawk fleets. So there is some equipment replacement.

    • @Nano606606
      @Nano606606 4 роки тому +4

      We also make the the bushmaster LAV's in Bendigo and a bunch of other stuff (shells, bombs, etc) with the French Thales group. Its pretty much a moot point though, because if this was to happen - as soon as the troops boarded the first ships in China, we would have weeks to stock up and buy arms off pretty much everyone before anyone landed. We already buy off the French, Germans, Brits, US, etc. So getting more would be easy - just a matter of money really.

    • @Dhdh365
      @Dhdh365 4 роки тому +5

      Except for heaps of stuff like inventing wifi, bionic hearing etc. At least we dont steal all our tech...

    • @sniper.93c14
      @sniper.93c14 4 роки тому

      Nano606606 I wouldn’t be surprised if other countries send volunteers to Australia

    • @goodshipkaraboudjan
      @goodshipkaraboudjan 4 роки тому

      @@adampaula1863 You probably typed that on wifi - an Aussie invention.

  • @wenhamschloff
    @wenhamschloff 4 роки тому +62

    Invading Australia has the opposite problems of invading Russia: Do not invade in the summer.

    • @alexpalmer776
      @alexpalmer776 3 роки тому +10

      If they invade in Summer we’ll all be at the beach anyway.... to take care of them and will simply just move the flags closer together... and throw Molotov cocktails at them and any other alcohol drink contain and then.... they have to get passed the sand whales ....and beach umbrellas and .... the hot sand and bitumen will melt their Made in China boots right off

    • @fraznofire2508
      @fraznofire2508 3 роки тому +2

      Jokes on you we get 30-40 degree temps Celsius all year round, it’s always summer

    • @nathanashley2693
      @nathanashley2693 3 роки тому

      The Australian public would surrender within 24hrs. It’s is an insult to put them into the same sentence in this context.

    • @RAAFLightning1
      @RAAFLightning1 3 роки тому

      @@nathanashley2693 lol no

  • @goofygoober2382
    @goofygoober2382 3 роки тому +10

    I can't even imagine what china's troops would react to a bushfire alone

  • @MrSubmariner76
    @MrSubmariner76 2 роки тому +8

    What would this look like with Australia having 8 nuke subs

    • @flynnralph4727
      @flynnralph4727 2 роки тому

      nuke fueled not nuke armed mate, big diff

  • @ronnycook3569
    @ronnycook3569 4 роки тому +11

    This analysis largely ignores the internal geography of Australia and the strategically important targets. Populated zones are largely limited to the East coast and the south-west around Perth and Albany; most of the rest is semi-arid with scattered towns. If China tried an invasion via the northwest (Christmas/Cocos islands) they couldn't get to anywhere important.
    The better route is probably just to take Papua first and build out from there; then establish a base on Cape York and work their way down the coast - but Cape York is rainforest; none of the top end is particularly amenable to mass troop movements.
    But with Papua taken, China could move troops en masse to Papua then take the landing craft via a much shorter route between Papua and Cape York, then work their way down the East Coast taking control of the major population centres.
    It's also worth remembering that the US is not Australia's only ally. Even if the US ignored its obligations under ANZUS, New Zealand would still assist, and it's quite likely that a couple of the other Commonwealth nations would lend a hand. Australia's navy is not large, but Britain's is quite respectable and has strong historical ties to Australia. Indonesia would likely also assist - while that alliance is VERY loose, if China took Australia then Indonesia would quite rightly see themselves as a next probable target.
    Fundamentally, China has the numbers, but Australia has the geography to defeat those numbers, even if we had no troops at all. There are some parallels with Russia - the terrain would defeat any invaders before a shot was fired, unless the invaders went straight for the fertile Eastern coast and ignored the rest of the country.

  • @miiiiiiiiiiick
    @miiiiiiiiiiick 4 роки тому +14

    One thing I never like about Binkov's video is it's always 100% of one nations force vs the other ... There is no way China could send even close to 100% of it's forces against Australia, whilst Australia could use 100% of it's own forces in Defence.
    China has far too many political issues at home, as well as neighbours it needs to watch closely, to spare even close to that amount of manpower to invade Australia.
    I also don't see why you'd think Australia would try defend the coast. Landing in the middle of nowhere, where there is minimal to no infrastructure, would be a slow and dangerous way to invade. Their supply lines would be massive, and vulnerable to ambush and IED style attacks. I don't see how China could overcome the tyranny of distance in the long term.
    With each city taken, China would also need to leave substantial garrisons to maintain their control... which would restrict available forces to move out in search of the ADF, which would be fighting guerrilla style warfare, not fixed positions.

    • @yesyesyesyes1600
      @yesyesyesyes1600 4 роки тому

      Some valid points. It is like the remake of red flood with Patrick Swayze. The one where Australia is invaded

    • @andrewsmall6834
      @andrewsmall6834 4 роки тому +1

      logic, thank you.

    • @andrewsmall6834
      @andrewsmall6834 4 роки тому +1

      @@yesyesyesyes1600 you mean red dawn and there's a better Australian version called tomorrow when the war began.

    • @yesyesyesyes1600
      @yesyesyesyes1600 4 роки тому +1

      @@andrewsmall6834 Yes sir, you are right. I couldn't remember the title anymore. Thx

  • @WeMustResist
    @WeMustResist 4 роки тому +11

    Allies or alone, with our mates or not, we Aussies would fight and fight and fight. Every adult and every child. Sticks, teeth, knuckles. Death or victory.

    • @captainusa2076
      @captainusa2076 4 роки тому +1

      No, i will not.

    • @RohanGillett
      @RohanGillett 4 роки тому

      With the obesity problem Australia has now, I think most Ozzies would be at home with their Playstations ... and diabetes sufferers :(

    • @deant3980
      @deant3980 3 роки тому +1

      Some would fight
      As you can see here, some will not.

  • @JETFOURLITRE
    @JETFOURLITRE 3 роки тому +26

    The one thing you need to remember when fighting Australian troops, is that you're fighting Australian troops.

    • @sindrome303
      @sindrome303 3 роки тому +4

      Australian Troops aren't what they use to be. First hand experience.

    • @RAAFLightning1
      @RAAFLightning1 3 роки тому +3

      @@sindrome303 back in the good old days of tobruk

    • @alcraig
      @alcraig 3 роки тому +1

      And NZ half an hour later

  • @MonkeyHazard
    @MonkeyHazard 4 роки тому +7

    Jesus christ people, it's just a fun hypothetical video, stop taking it so seriously.

    • @jxmai7687
      @jxmai7687 4 роки тому +1

      It is funny to talk seriously lol

  • @raychristison5231
    @raychristison5231 4 роки тому +13

    You should study Australian geography and landscape before attempting an analysis such as this. In World War II the Imperial Japanese Army was afraid of invading Australia. Also, If China went war with Australia it would immediately be starved of the iron ore and coal resources its economy depends upon.

    • @ankitdgaf
      @ankitdgaf 4 роки тому +3

      - China will never go to war with Australia infact they don't need to...China is flooding Australia in the form of immigrants and buying Australians property with lots of investment in Australian market so in conclusion we can say Australia is China's china

  • @davidbuck6976
    @davidbuck6976 4 роки тому +10

    Entertaining. Two things were not addressed. 1. Those six Collins class subs we have would carve the Chinese fleet a new one in waters south and east of Indonesia. Heck just two of them passing through Indonesia waters for a preemptive strike North of the Sprately Islands would do enormous damage: 22 torps each, 1 for each major Chinese warship or sub. Remember that a Collins sub severely handled a US fleet near Hawaii over a decade ago in a War Game. The chinese ASW and their noisy subs are a joke. 2. Chinese Land forces would lack choppers and our tank forces would wreck them as we would still have local air support with remaining fighters. About the only thing accurate would be the loss of surface ships, but they would exact a heavy toll from the invaders.

    • @davu5637
      @davu5637 2 роки тому

      Most American and its puppets rightly believe that the U.S. military is the best and most formidable in the world. If that is correct, why, since the end of World War II, has the United States lost every war it started and failed every time it used force without just cause? Indeed, if the U.S. military was a sports team, it would land in the bottom divisions.
      The US and its puppets can't even bet the Taliban in twenty years and now run away, let alone thinking of invading China who has already acquired nuclear capability.

  • @royalteluis623
    @royalteluis623 4 роки тому +9

    Binkov forgot about the hordes of kangaroos and legions of poisonous beast

    • @jcarlovitch
      @jcarlovitch 4 роки тому +1

      Not too mention that Homo erotic gang of road warriors that harassed Mel Gibson.

    • @crazymage9636
      @crazymage9636 3 роки тому

      China eats dogs, and that's a animal that has unconditional love for humans.....good bye wild life.

  • @Master-il1sk
    @Master-il1sk 4 роки тому +7

    binkov should do a hypothetical world war 3

  • @AlphaOmegaJMAC
    @AlphaOmegaJMAC 4 роки тому +12

    Any troops landing are likely to be killed by sharks, spiders, snakes, crocs etc... before they even saw combat.

    • @MartinNLauenstein
      @MartinNLauenstein 4 роки тому +1

      Don't forget emu's.

    • @jeremydixon8708
      @jeremydixon8708 4 роки тому

      Yeah, that's the thing, our land is harsh and unforgiving.

    • @The_Desert_Tiger
      @The_Desert_Tiger 4 роки тому

      10% of Chinese deaths will probably be from spider bites to their dicks.

  • @Jstars200
    @Jstars200 3 роки тому +35

    Problem for China is that Australia is ”more” than allies with UK/USA - they are pretty much brothers. So even in the event that NATO is collapsed - china would always need to face uk/usa if they attack NZ/Australia.

    • @giuseppebeppe2770
      @giuseppebeppe2770 3 роки тому +3

      This is exactly what prevents a war Australia vs China: the so-called Anglosphere. Second. NATO is still alive, so (art.5) also EU would be involved in this war.

    • @madonemt
      @madonemt 3 роки тому +3

      100% 🇬🇧 🇦🇺

    • @ex0duzz
      @ex0duzz 3 роки тому +1

      Relax, China is not going to invade Australia. China hasn't had a war for 40 years. Australia is even more aggressive than China and participated in many more wars. See the recent war crimes our soldiers did in Afghanistan. You can be sure if also happened in Iraq, Vietnam, and every other war we follow our "brother" into. Funny how all those wars are based on lies though..? Yeah, how hilarious. Great brotherly actions.

    • @Regmite1996
      @Regmite1996 3 роки тому

      There's a huge problem, if USA has a Civil War which will erupt soon. China will invade every country in site

    • @madonemt
      @madonemt 3 роки тому

      @@Regmite1996 they can try. India, Australia, Japan, UK will probably have something to say about that. China's neighbours don't really like China.

  • @Eskay1206
    @Eskay1206 3 роки тому +7

    you didnt factor in the Chinese would lose about 15% to crocs, another 20% to snakes, 10% spiders/centipedes/ticks/mosquito, another 15% to the heat and they havent even made it to the desert yet

    • @mwbgaming28
      @mwbgaming28 3 роки тому +1

      Plus another 10% lost to the clouds of flies once they go more than 20km from the coast

    • @gustavscholten597
      @gustavscholten597 3 роки тому +1

      And when the Chinese Armed Forces finally march down the Tullamarine freeway into the CBD in Melbourne, they notice that more than half of all signs on buildings are in Chinese!! They’d think the Aussies want to make them feel at home..! They notice every second cafe in Swanson st is Chinese owned and the State premier is a communist who signed up with the Chinese Belt and Road initiative. They never felt more at home. Mission accomplished !

    • @peterpopovich4498
      @peterpopovich4498 3 роки тому

      and if in the middle of summer set the bush on fire,,,,,Good Luck keeping an army in the bush,,,

    • @iou0
      @iou0 3 роки тому

      More like the Chinese will eat all the crocs, snakes, spiders/centipedes/ticks/mosquitos. China #1

    • @mwbgaming28
      @mwbgaming28 3 роки тому +1

      @@iou0 the only quality thing china has made so far is Covid 19, their military training sucks so hard that they have to implant kill chips in their soldiers

  • @Asdfghjkl-w6j
    @Asdfghjkl-w6j 3 роки тому +65

    Don't worry 🇦🇺 we 🇮🇳🇺🇸🇯🇵 are with you ❤️

    • @dansmith9724
      @dansmith9724 3 роки тому +4

      Those Indian leg spin grenades would rattle the chinese👍. The aussies and Indians have teamed up well in the past. Rommel would testify to that in those sandy North African pitches.
      🤣😉👍🇦🇺🇮🇳🍻

    • @Asdfghjkl-w6j
      @Asdfghjkl-w6j 3 роки тому +2

      @@dansmith9724 yeah bro blue and yellow will make dragon a cute puppy 😂😂

    • @mitchellgraves9927
      @mitchellgraves9927 3 роки тому +1

      This comment thread is awesome!

    • @hungaryyang9505
      @hungaryyang9505 3 роки тому +1

      Yes. We are allies and speak english and does military trainings, too.

    • @garvtaneja1005
      @garvtaneja1005 3 роки тому +1

      Jai BJP

  • @valdivia1234567
    @valdivia1234567 4 роки тому +8

    I think China invading Australia would be similar to Russia invading Finland in 1939, only worse.

    • @valdivia1234567
      @valdivia1234567 4 роки тому +3

      @Darren Walsh I meant that I think Australia would kick China's ass just like Finland kicked Russia's ass until their overwhelming number allowed them to take some of Finland but not all of it.

  • @Morisu-Chan
    @Morisu-Chan 4 роки тому +11

    So basically, China could win if no other country intervenes, but at a great cost.

    • @amsuther
      @amsuther 3 роки тому +1

      Pretty much sums it up. So...we should have a big stockpile of munitions, fuel and spares. Keep a long range accurate strike capability, and be able to see them coming. Be sneaky..and make it pretty ugly, and make the adventure just not worth the effort and expense.

    • @Morisu-Chan
      @Morisu-Chan 3 роки тому

      @@amsuther I would say China is probably not gonna attack Australia any time soon, mainly because it’s not worth it,

    • @amsuther
      @amsuther 3 роки тому

      @@Morisu-Chan inclined to totally agree with you mate. If anything it may have gone from "no bloody way" to "pretty bloody unlikely "... Think of hundreds or reasons why it isn't worth it...and no reason for it... Pretty much sums up and warlike adventure. Good old Binkov's videos are more an unlikely what if into an alternate reality. Some things accurate, some less so...some..WTF ?!?!??! Seeing many of the comments can be just as entertaining !! ;-)

    • @deant3980
      @deant3980 3 роки тому

      Impossible to conquer us from the outside. You don't know our terrain. We've lived here all our lives and are very much outdoors, survivalist type ppl. Many of us anyway. You might take our weaker big cities, but our country folk will eat you alive. Enjoy close to 50 degree heat with no obvious water insight for 500km. Then a 100km bushfire heading straight at you.
      We live in this already. You have no idea.

  • @ImGodTheMaryBanger
    @ImGodTheMaryBanger 3 роки тому +3

    If the Chinese army surrounded Melbourne then I'm getting my cricket bat and going out swinging. 🤣

  • @PhillPower-hf1zn
    @PhillPower-hf1zn 4 роки тому +8

    Every citizen of Australia is ready to take up arms to make life hell for all Chinese should they try!

  • @fauzinayan1191
    @fauzinayan1191 4 роки тому +18

    If PLA set their foot on Australia they will face the Magpie Air Force.

    • @johnw5584
      @johnw5584 4 роки тому

      That was a funny video.

    • @altair1323
      @altair1323 3 роки тому

      And the plover air reserves

  • @gando121
    @gando121 Рік тому +7

    If you think only 5% of aussies would fight, you havent met many aussies

  • @brunodrivel2487
    @brunodrivel2487 3 роки тому +11

    having worked in most places of Australia you may not understand the country itself is deadly. think of the advantages Russia had due to its climate area and just nothingness.china cost would be immense and supply lines extremely vulnerable. added the fact that water is scarce and food non existent and don't for a second think Australia wont practice scorched earth using bush fires as a weapon of choice. i wont go into what bull dust does to vehicles and aircraft.

    • @MayDayMei98
      @MayDayMei98 3 роки тому +3

      This! Australia has a massive geographic advantage. Especially with their main population/industrial centers being largely on the eastern coast.

    • @johney3734
      @johney3734 3 роки тому

      yes in WW2 we had a thing called the Brisbane line in a nut shell the plan was to blow up the roads in the north and make the enemy walk down that said this vlip should not be in 2 parts and should only be 3 sec long Could Chinese military conquer Australia? 1..... 2..... yes!!!!!! thank you for watching dont forget to subscribe they have nukes we dont and we all live in the 3 big city's its one of the most urban populations on earth

    • @socialaccount1421
      @socialaccount1421 2 роки тому

      Australia is far more hospitable than Russia. Along the coast the temperature is very pleasant around the year, and you never have to wear anything more than a long-sleeved shirt in the winter.
      The outback and mountains are harder, but there'd be no point occupying them anyway. Most Australians live in the coasts, and rural areas are dependent on urban areas for supplies. I think most Australians would rather (unhappily) accept enemy occupation than do without modern industry and technology.

  • @idefyu23
    @idefyu23 4 роки тому +9

    And that's why we're allied with the U.S, U.K etc.

    • @yangzhang7765
      @yangzhang7765 4 роки тому +1

      Why China invade a country built by UK's criminals?

  • @roberttbrockway
    @roberttbrockway 4 роки тому +8

    Binkov has missed on this one. At one point the video portrayed a Chinese landing in Cape York. The area is entirely impassable for 6 months a year with limited access at other times. A large force that somehow landed there would be stuck on the beaches and easily defeated.
    The Australian government regularly assesses threats to Australia. No nation other than the United States currently has the capacity to invade Australia. China *may be* a threat after 2030 but even that is fairly optimistic.
    To understand why Australia is so hard to invade, learn about supply lines and zones of control and how they relate to geography, particularly oceans and deserts. The ADF is set up to prevent landing and to isolate any troops that somehow manage to land on the mainland. Chinse troops landing in the desert will likely die of dehydration. Don't believe me? Research how Israel defeated two Egyptian armies in the Sinai in 1973. It was all over control of oil and water.
    China can't even invade Taiwan currently. The PLA has said they will have this capacity no earlier than 2020.

    • @it34asiajermainet.91
      @it34asiajermainet.91 4 роки тому

      Well said mate 👍

    • @kevinzheng2898
      @kevinzheng2898 4 роки тому

      China wouldn't invade in the first place

    • @juliomaldonado4028
      @juliomaldonado4028 4 роки тому +2

      @@kevinzheng2898 Oh my God. Its a fun bs scenario to think about. You actually think Binkov is serious about the Chinese invading the land of absolute badasses?

  • @Camo6132
    @Camo6132 4 роки тому +7

    Binkov, you forgot to mention the Australian submarine fleet, which although small, is very effective and participates in a lot of exercises with the US and have even successfully sunk US carriers in simulated exercises. They would take out a lot of the Chinese navy before they got the chance to invade.

    • @simonyip5978
      @simonyip5978 Рік тому

      The Chinese PLA Navy has 70-80 x SSN and SSK submarines and 60 x DDG and 50+ x FFG and 52+ x FSG (Type 056A).
      Australia has 6 x SSK submarines, China has 240 x submarines and large ASW ships that are trained to hunt and destroy enemy submarines.
      40 x Chinese ASW ships and submarines for every Australian submarine. Just how long do you expect the 6 RAN submarines to survive, never mind be able to attack?

  • @iamasmurf1122
    @iamasmurf1122 4 роки тому +8

    Chinese invaded Australia years ago through customs

  • @Ashadowtotheworld
    @Ashadowtotheworld 3 роки тому +9

    They would lose 80-90% of whatever they send this way before they even get here.

  • @skybluesquad2444
    @skybluesquad2444 4 роки тому +8

    Aussies just got 350 long range missiles (from the US) for the hornets. That’s gotta help us 🇦🇺

  • @drizzy5873
    @drizzy5873 4 роки тому +7

    you should put into consideration australias allies coming and supplying the australian military and also providing troop,air and navy support

  • @jarradhurley4866
    @jarradhurley4866 2 роки тому +9

    Im impressed that Australia could potentially hold China off for that long on its own.

    • @andrewsimpson2108
      @andrewsimpson2108 2 роки тому +2

      If China does invade Australia , we are making alot of our own weapons here ( Ships , guns ,tanks , APC , ECT ) , and we have millions of men and women that would be more then happy to stand on our beaches with machine guns , it is almost impossible to take over this country , we grow more food here then all of Europe combind , we will be fine for a lot longer than other countries think .

  • @tonylester8383
    @tonylester8383 4 роки тому +8

    Australia also has Kangaroo Army

  • @Zilentification
    @Zilentification 4 роки тому +7

    Stupid video, forgot to mention our most powerful defense force. Whilst China may initially succeed, once the Emus get involved the casualties the Chinese army suffer would be too high to bear. A total route would begin. They may flee back to China, but I got some terrifying news for you, Emus can swim.
    EDIT: I actually liked the video

  • @theodoreolson8529
    @theodoreolson8529 4 роки тому +9

    I think the lack of robust logistics fleet support would undermine the Chinese ability to maintain a sortie rate.
    Edit: meaning the aircraft burn fuel at a high rate.

  • @launchincomes8951
    @launchincomes8951 3 роки тому +7

    Australia would NEVER be alone!

    • @bearsagainstevil
      @bearsagainstevil 3 роки тому +2

      yup as there seems to be more danger at the moment Id like my country the uk to station troops and ships there

  • @kineticstar
    @kineticstar 4 роки тому +8

    Ahhh.... Where is all the fuel, food and water coming from for the Chinese in this invasion? The problem for china is they are not built for forward projection. They are trying but not at the level of this scenario. The logistics just doesn't add up. That makes it a failed war of attrition because the attackers wont have the resources to maintain a real life offensive. Also with a two year long fight Australia would have plenty of time to build ocean mine fields to prevent direct access to suitable landing zones.
    With that said I disagree with this outcome.

    • @kennywang1707
      @kennywang1707 4 роки тому

      From my limited knowledge, I'm pretty sure China has plans to push civilian ships into transport duties just like America does in case of total war.
      Yes, it would be extraordinarily difficult in the beginning for China to supply assault troops far from its coastline.

    • @aussiegod4269
      @aussiegod4269 4 роки тому

      The US would put an economic embargo on Chinese goods along with a handful of other Western nations .

  • @Simoss13
    @Simoss13 3 роки тому +9

    In the real world, China has no chance against Australia. I know this video did not want to cover it but Australia has too many allies.
    Not only the big countries will support Australia, the small countries between Australia and China will not play dead if an invasion happened. Australia is small on a global scale, but huge in the south east corner of the world.
    Besides Aussies are awesome and everyone likes them 🤠

    • @bearsagainstevil
      @bearsagainstevil 3 роки тому +2

      yup I noticed in comments about the uk sending a carrier fleet to the pacific people from countrys who were either in our old empire or just around region, saying it was good because they were worried about china . Even without America you would have a incredible alliance of countrys all with their own ships and planes and army's

  • @colonelwirehead2045
    @colonelwirehead2045 4 роки тому +10

    I think this underestimates us Australians a little, we would start building our own weapons in the way of small arms like our old Owen Gun, that is as basic as a Sten gun can get. And as for the Australian people them selves if we can hold a gun we will fight, man, woman or other no matter the age.

    • @hamishthecat4370
      @hamishthecat4370 4 роки тому +2

      Clinton McDonald You're correct about the Aussie people, once they're woken up. I was an early "Yellow Vester" protesting the garbage happening to Australians 'till I saw those same Australians drive past thinking we were ridiculous. But anyway....................... So you're the one who's going to ask George Soros for our guns back? Good on ya mate.

  • @larrybird3729
    @larrybird3729 3 роки тому +7

    One word "Tobruk" they shouldn't underestimate taking Australia land , Australia have a lot of war experience.

    • @AFT_05G
      @AFT_05G 3 роки тому +1

      Well quantity defeats quality in a total war especially in conventional war..

    • @hiyorisarugaki1830
      @hiyorisarugaki1830 3 роки тому

      @@AFT_05G But Australia would never be alone.

    • @Raz.C
      @Raz.C 3 роки тому +1

      You know, all/ most of the Aussie soldiers who fought at Tobruk are now long dead. You can't assume that all Australian military adventures are going to be exact duplicates of that engagement. Especially when we have massive defeats like the one at Galipoli in our history, too. While our soldiers are a pretty serious bunch, we don't have many of them at all. The Chinese have far too many soldiers for us to have any chance at holding them off. Every piece of military hardware (in this scenario) we lose is irreplaceable, since they're all imported, whereas China makes its own tanks/ jets/ ships/ munitions/ etc...
      In this scenario, we'd be Super-Fucked! In a real-world scenario, we'd be gathering our defences close to the mainland, trying to hold the Chinese off long enough for British and american assets to arrive and intervene on our behalf.

    • @sillyoldbastard3280
      @sillyoldbastard3280 3 роки тому +3

      @@AFT_05G I don't believe you understand what fighting a war of attrition is about. China would have no hope of a successful invasion of Australia.

    • @certain_sloth
      @certain_sloth 3 роки тому

      Is it possible for Australia to start producing its own equipment for a total war scenario? That would alleviate many of the problems, it would be an ugly mess of a war but might change the outcome.