Mazda3 2014 v Ford Focus v Volkswagen Golf Comparison | Drive.com.au

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 35

  • @carboselanne
    @carboselanne 10 років тому +11

    To me the Ford doesn't compare to the other two. It's quicker perhaps, but otherwise looks and feels cheap inside. You get more features for less money in the 3 vs the Golf, plus better seats and fuel economy. The Mazda feels like a more substantial, upscale car. The Golf feels every bit a small compact. Reliability and resale histories of the previous gens favor the Mazda as well.

    • @myk3al1
      @myk3al1 7 років тому +2

      The focus titanium has much better inside then the trend, why compare a the new maz 3 with the shittest focus trim

  • @joebloggs2312
    @joebloggs2312 2 роки тому +1

    I have a Golf, now nearly 7 years, still drives like new and looked after... style is plain but on the upside it stays in style longer. I think she's a keeper

  • @001spring
    @001spring 10 років тому +15

    Best looking car inside and out is easily the Mazda 3, not even close. Focus & Golf have to be the two most boring cars on the market.

  • @jacobomourloglou403
    @jacobomourloglou403 10 років тому +7

    mazda is impressive.

  • @User-cb4jm
    @User-cb4jm 2 роки тому

    Given what we know about all the class action lawsuit level reliability issues with Ford Powershift and VW dry clutch DSG, the Mazda’s 6sp auto is a solid and reliable performer.

  • @MnqobiElethu-zi8vq
    @MnqobiElethu-zi8vq Рік тому

    My Aunt has The Mazda 3 and it still fresh

  • @Heidar07
    @Heidar07 8 років тому +3

    Golf has high quality interior and quite spacious. Rear windows of Mazda3 are too small. VW Golf definately more suitable for family car

  • @DUCzillaMonster
    @DUCzillaMonster 6 років тому +3

    the ford is showing his age?? what about the golf, has it ever changes since 1990??

    • @User-cb4jm
      @User-cb4jm 2 роки тому +1

      Look at the horrendous interior on the Focus. Looks like an 80s VCR player. The Golf exterior is a bit dull but at least it feels nice where it matters.

  • @promichsrb
    @promichsrb 7 років тому +3

    Golf stuck in time near 1988 :) it looks like upgraded golf mk 2 or serie 3 , quality is probably better tnah others but its boring look !!!!

  • @guy0172
    @guy0172 9 років тому +1

    golf might be more expensive, but it's better and classier.

  • @MemoriesDestroyUs
    @MemoriesDestroyUs 8 років тому +1

    noisiest caw hee

  • @iksanws3484
    @iksanws3484 8 років тому +2

    ford♡ focus

  • @ThePC3D
    @ThePC3D 10 років тому +6

    Mazda 3 cheap plastic knob and hideous aftermarket inserts all around. golf is better in every sense. With mazda 3 you are just paying for exterior looks skyactive BS is just marketing

    • @Driver6M
      @Driver6M 10 років тому +2

      Mazda's Skyactive tech is marketing BS but VW's Bluemotion tech isn't? Um, yeah whatever mate.

    • @89foxn
      @89foxn 9 років тому +2

      ThePC3D are u fckin kidding me ? the golf is much more plastic than the mazda 3 ..... have u ever tried a mazda ? O.O

    • @ThePC3D
      @ThePC3D 9 років тому

      +89foxn my wifey owns new model. dont get fooled by fake carbon fibre and plether seats. Go back to school

    • @89foxn
      @89foxn 9 років тому +2

      who the fuck cares about ur wifey. youre definitely an idiot if u think that the golf is better quality...it is plastic cheapshit.I tried a golf, my dog owns one...

    • @ThePC3D
      @ThePC3D 9 років тому +1

      +89foxn dont worry about going to school, you are special in every single way....

  • @duckland27
    @duckland27 6 років тому

    Mazda got no space at back which isn't show here. Plus Golf is ages ahead of Mazda in interior and solid. Another thing is turbo charged engine in VW which is waaaay better. I would never buy Mazda, car just look nice outside and that's about it.

  • @super_slav91
    @super_slav91 9 років тому +1

    Damn the mazda 3 is hideous, the entire mazda line up is.

    • @kdomster9141
      @kdomster9141 9 років тому +5

      +Super_Slav
      Slav, you sound like a jealous Honda dealer

    • @super_slav91
      @super_slav91 9 років тому

      Hondas are even worse but mazdas dont look good imo and they have the most incompetant a/c system and i have been in mazda 2, 3 and 6 and it has been the same story woth the a/c.

    • @kdomster9141
      @kdomster9141 9 років тому +2

      SLAV, i live in Florida for 16 years, AC in CX9 and Mazda 6 is great , sooon much stronger than Passat or euro cars not designed to deal with real Hot climates...

    • @super_slav91
      @super_slav91 9 років тому

      k domster
      I have a VAG car and live in Australia where it gets crazy hot,I have a Skoda Fabia and even when it was 48 celcius (118.4 Fahrenheit) it was freezing inside, fan on 2 and then lowered to 1 out of 4, meanwhile my mums mazda cannot cool fan on 4 takes over an hour to get close to comfortable, mechanics say it is working normally and it is normal, some cars just have worse units. I know people with mazda 3's and mazda 2's and I have been in both when it was around 30 celcius and it was as weak as my mums mazda, I have also been in a mazda 6 but it was a older model, 2004 ish though and it was also weak. If you want guaranteed strong A/C get a Mitsubishi or Toyota, as they use good quality equipment, DENSO for Toyota and Mitsubishi made great units also.

    • @kdomster9141
      @kdomster9141 9 років тому

      Cx9 cools off a cabin from 110F at 2pm at my works parking lot very quickly, new 2014 Mazda 3 does cool off fast.... 2006 new at the time Passat was like you said very weak and slow to cool off.... older mazda 6 would leak c oolant at 100 k miles :(