Faceswapping, Unethical Videos, and Future Shock
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 жов 2024
- I was going to tell a science fiction story about faceswapping, and mass blackmail. Then the news broke about unethical faceswapping videos, and software designed and marketed for creating them: and I realised the future had arrived faster than I thought.
(This was originally a talk given at An Evening of Unnecessary Detail earlier this week, but I managed to mangle the audio recording settings, so I rerecorded it in a muddy park! It's not the same without the audience, but hopefully it's close enough.)
Sources:
www.theguardia...
www.theverge.c...
With thanks to Matt Parker: / standupmaths
(No, I'm not giving you a link to the app, you can find it yourself if you really want to.)
🟥 MORE FROM TOM: www.tomscott.com/
(you can find contact details and social links there too)
📰 WEEKLY NEWSLETTER with good stuff from the rest of the internet: www.tomscott.c...
❓ LATERAL, free weekly podcast: lateralcast.com/ / lateralcast
➕ TOM SCOTT PLUS: / tomscottplus
👥 THE TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES: / techdif
The thumbnail on this video is a cursed image and I'm sorry about it. Not sorry enough to change it, though.
Tom Scott it did look horrific...
HAHA good job
Will you apologize for that face in this video on the Park Bench?
It did it's job well, it caught my attention and made me click the video
Tom Scott It looks freaky but cool.
Your ability to speak clear coherent thoughts to a camera is incredible.
SmarterEveryDay He's incredible isn't he!? Mind you, your ability to do the same is truly amazing too.
Have a great day Destin, and as my biology teacher tells me: "Maintain careful observation of nature, always".
Tom does this in so few takes though. It's actually amazing.
This is a hilarious example of "The pot calling the kettle black" :D
SmarterEveryDay hello!
Destin meets Tom, my heart's screaming collab! :')
Every time there’s a huge online debate on a topic, UA-cam has a Tom Scott video from half a decade ago where he called it
it happens everytime
it just goes to show how much foresight Tom has for these sorts of issues
"Everyone draws the moral line of what's acceptable just slightly below what they're actually doing." What a great way to put it.
I'd actually compare this tech to getting off to your friends or their pictures. This is something many, many people do. And we'd consider it extremely creepy to share. But there's genuinely no harm done if it isn't shared. I don't see why using this technology would be different. Even if it is much more creepier to be shared.
@@sploofmcsterra4786 it's really just a video version of photoshop. Anyone can google an image of Kim Kardashian and photoshop her to look human, so as long as nothing shady is being done with this tech it's just a photoshopped video
@@tylerlackey1175 yes, but the possibility of it being shady should also be considered. Most countries ban gun usage because sure, most people will use it for self-defense, but what about those who use it to deliberately commit crimes? Same thing here
@@EddieB-ready idk if your comment was a joke or not but it made me blow air out of my nose
Weird. I usually draw my lines way lower or slightly above what I'm actually doing
I love how Matt Parker's face (as his UA-cam channel) came up at the end of the video over Tom
So good! :D
Quite literally, joke of the century
that was intentional and it was pure genius
that’s almost certainly intentional
@@sodiboo "almost?"
I just love how even a very skilled programmer can't stop Windows 10 to update itself
True though
Amoeliorated windows ten - give it a try.
@@awabqureshi814 j
@@iftikharomar5513 j
U
This tech will be an episode of Black Mirror next season.
Oh hi Jack. Fancy finding you down here in the bottom of the comments section while scrolling.
Hello?! S3E1?!?
Hey Jack, love you.
What a coincidence that the next video in my "Watch Later" list is "ROAST - Battlefield 1"
same i am surprised as well
The scary part isn't if someone can doctor a politician saying what they want. The scary part is the politician claiming all evidence is fraudulent.
Exactly. It's already happening, but in this future they could be right and you would never be able to know.
There's nothing wrong with skepticism. It's already not wise to blindly trust evidence, even without sophisticated computer graphics, because evidence could still be taken out of context or manipulated in all sorts of less sophisticated ways. It's better to learn to be doubtful of everything and get comfortable with that. We might have to start judging politicians based on their performance in government rather than their private lives, but would that be so bad?
Ansatz66 Would be nice if it ever went that way rather than the current circus.
It's less of a problem than what Tom brings up about blackmail and other types of more personal attacks.
Because politicians are already fraudulent. They don't hold any standard for correctness really. Sorry to bring up politics but:
Here in Sweden all our political parties bar 1 had pro-immigration rhetoric. This was a question that got A LOT of time in media.
The gist of the situation is that all except two has changed their mind on this.
So they were lying.
Now someone might suggest circumstances changed. But they didn't qualify their statements at all really. They are either weak and misleading statements or plain wrong. The goal from the government is now the EU minimum level, officially.
If I were the one voter we'd swap all of them for people with more fear of being wrong. Difficult to achieve but after a few iterations maybe.
This is something that's worse than corruption. With corruption you can say that they should be punished.
Consider the impact of a scandalous affair of a politician versus something like this. Or even actual corruption. Faceswapped or not.
Doesn't even come close. So we need to learn to judge them on thing other than the fruitless talk.
I'm very afraid that people will take the wrong approach to this kind of problem and try to fight it. That just obscures the lack of importance in what your politicians say. You trust their party on their history. That's the only good measure you have.
oh come on! no honest politician would ever do that! please notice, I said "honest" As for the current potus, he doesn't need this ... but for quite different reasons
2018: woah. Deep fakes are scary technology with dangerous implications
2019: schmoyoho makes Obama dance to spooky scary skeletons
Thank you so much for introducing me to this
It's perfect that you mentioned that one in particular.
Wait what?
*Watches video
*Tom Scott appears
OH HEY!
*Continues to live in the matrix
Everything that was used to make deepfakes has been basically wiped off the face of the internet, it's absurd
"All the people who brought us here have different backgrounds, different stories, different beliefs, we do not give up. Nah nah nah nah not today. We do not get stuck in replay."
The real question is how much more convincing the Onion will become from now on.
This guy gets it
Okay this is definitely an upside
Can't give you more than a single updoot. So take my comment as another one.
Now EVERY news site becomes The Onion!
That's how it goes, in terms of technological processes. Porn, then satire, then the outside world
He's like: "Imma make a story"
Story: *happens in real life*
Tom: "Oh, my word"
Double entendre
I think it's a silly thing to worry about anyway, as long as deepfake technology progresses, deepfake detection technology will progress equally.
the life of an onion writer
@@april5054 deepfake defection?
Nah more like
"Bollocks!"
3 years before: ''Omg deepfakes scary''
Nowadays: 'DAME DA NE
Dame yo, dame na no yo
Anta ga suki de suki sugite
@@RubyPiec doredake
It's even scarier now. The memes are just a less serious application of it. Just imagine what malicious activities people must be using it to do now.
@@Kristimilaa tsuyoi osake demo
I'd love to see Tom extract frames from a few more videos, let it train for a full week, and then post an update video with the results.
Results: Charcoal and wasted time.
How did you swap your face onto mine? I demand to know!
This is amazing. Whole movies with cage as every actor. This is the sublime nature of memes
And it's the logical conclusion of all meme culture. This is where humanity peaks.
I'm excited.
Won't work, as far as I understand the process. It preserves the facial movements of a recipient, not the donor. It only transplants appearance, not the whaky Cage emoting. Correct me, if I'm mistaken.
I'm more excited for Cage porn with all actors being Cage.
The peak of human evolution is among us
Windows 10
Powerful Nvidia Graphics Card
Moderate Tech Skills
Poor or no empathy.
I wonder how many people sat forward with a notepad after that.
Step 1... check
Step 2... 1070 ti count? check
Step 3... check
Step 4... huh. Is this guy targeting me specifically?
@@FranchDressing That subtle flex lmao
You didn't?
I have intel integrated graphics is that good eneuogh?
Have all of the above...well, except for the empathy. It is immensely cruel to pull of a trick like this for blackmail, but I'd say it would be nice to build an algo that can detect if an image was doctored. A reverse engineering exercise, if you will.
Tom: WINDOWS STOP UPDATING
Windows: No, I don’t think I will.
Shouldn't have connected it to the Internet.
Windows" I'm sorry tom, i can't let you do that"
@@tobybartels8426
It'll still try to update anyway, it's Windows. We should just be thankful that the updates don't take as long as Mac OS X updates.
@@just_a_rock : It'll try to, but it can't get the update if it's not online. It's the only way to be safe.
@@tobybartels8426
That's true. It can't get the update, but it still tries to check for one nonstop.
ha ha.. yeah, cancel windows updates... it ignores you and does it anyway.
If only one did not need wine to do this.
Just like the upgrades. 'Do you want to upgrade your operating system now?' NO 'thank you for choosing yes, we're upgrading your computer now... no there is no cancel shut up, it's happening'
If only windows had two categories for updates, important security ones, and everything else, so we can get the 5Mb worth of security without the 500Mb Coratana and edge update that somehow resets the privacy settings to please upload every keystroke.
Duncan Cunningham Windows updates never bothered cause after so many years they optimized it so they don't disturb you. Plus, those updates are really damn important.
I love when an update "fails to install" so windows just tries it over and over again, downloading the whole thing again and sucking up my bandwidth with no way to turn it off. Been thinking about going back to linux.
This video aged well. Sadly the fact it ages well means the world's an even scarier place now.
did you hear about the atrioc situation?
@@JudyAlvarez2077 who or what's atrioc and what's the situation?
@@Kevin-qh1ve atrioc was a fairly popular streamer who was casught with deepfake porn of his friends
@@JudyAlvarez2077 ouch, that sucks. Humanity has too little integrity and self-responsibility to have this tech.
The AI didn't take into account foreheads apparently.
They tend to leave the forheads of the former person, bit glitchy arround the eyebrows... I know cause ive seen more deepfakes... eventualy your looking at them quite technicaly and hope ppl would at least spend more time in perfecting this... then remember when that happens, how are you gonne tell a deepfake is fake?
Jacksfilms is safe!
But it does take into account foreplay and head giving apparently.
That's why you wanna use 2 similar enough people to do it on.
algorithm =/= AI
Here's something scarier, prosecutors editing defendants into security videos.
Reality can be whatever i want
@@pattyisfine7198 ah yes a fellow ace attorney player
@@pattyisfine7198 "Objection, dumbass"
It has to be treated the same way Photoshop is; by acknowledging it could happen
@@SailorGalaxia ooh i just started playing!
There’s literally an app for this now. Crazy how little time has passed and Tom was right.
2:41 you literally laughed at nothing.
The sign of a good video
WTF
Took me sometimes to realize
U mean u dont do that?
I wonder what the person with the dog thought about the guy pointing at nothing
Plot twist: This video is the actual face swap, and the examples were intentionally badly masked back into the video, frame by frame.
"all I have is 500 distorted images of Matt Parker"
could be worse I guess
You have too small of a dataset for it to properly train. Most of the creators are working with thousands of images and thousands of frames. If you had had a larger set of frames it would've probably worked out better.
Yep, and also probably better quality pictures.
Yes. A million images or so might be better.
@@rin_etoware_2989
Not how it works. A few million is too much. A few thousand with good resolution and abot 500 thousand iterations
if your GPU isn't the target's Horcrux, you ain't there yet
That's why it worked so well for the guy who was obsessed with Cage.
Black Mirror is happening faster than they can record the episodes....
Buddy Crotty the growth of artificial intelligence will be exponential.
that show sucks tho
IGNACIO SAVI ‘*gasp* *Get out you heathen child*
cjeam black mirror is my least favouritest anime
Honestly, it has nothing on Cory in the House's season 3. The topics they touched on in that season were ahead of its time...
It's wild that this was 5 years ago and yet it seems like a warning from 15 years ago
Plot Twist: The author of this video didn't have Tom's consent
deep
stfu exe
woah
what would be seriously creepy is a faceswapped park bench episode!!!
The scary part is it might actually work. In park bench videos Matt and Tom sit at basically the exact same angle and distance, I'd imagine this makes it easier to train a faceswap AI. It might even take into account the foreheads. Would take a lot of time for it to learn though, there are hours of footage.
"Would take a lot of time for it to learn though, there are hours of footage."
Have you seen the video that just came out with all their videos at 1000x the original speed? Maybe - just maybe - you just explained the reason behind it...
Gonna take a loooong time before we get anything near amateur photoshop work automated, but I still think it would be interesting to see what happens if the algorithm is given more data and time to train. Though you do have a point in that their faces are different shapes, so a convincing faceswap might be impossible.
Just have them sit on the other side and do an Audio swap of their voices.
Plot twist: this video originally features standupmaths!
This topic seriously needs a revisit, maybe like: "5 years ago, I predicted. Is present even worse than that?"
i agree
I love how in the end screen, the subscribe to Matt Parker button is over your face.
Jonas van der Schaaf: Budget face-swapping XD
Thanks! Came here to post exactly this. It cracked me up.
Jonas van der Schaaf ikr lmao
I choose to believe that it wasn't by accident
I literally lol'd
2018: This is disgusting. People are using modern technology to make un-consented, unethical porn with a face swapping program that looks so realistic it's almost impossible to tell. This could be the end of the world, someone could make a video pretending to be Kim Jong-Un declaring war, and people in the government would probably believe it. This is a genuine, concerning threat.
2020: obama beatboxing 😳
These memes are a double edged sword with how we’re able to counter this in the near future with counter ai
Obama beatbox? 😳
Obama Beatbox 😳
@@LeapyLad Obama beatbox.
people are still going to do bad stuff, even if people make funny stuff
this aged like fine wine.
We must cagify everything.
Ajit Pai: We're trying!
Cage is, uhh, overplayed, be one with the Busey.
Fandyus wrong cage!
Really? No entire channels of malkovich? Commit to the premise or go home.
All shall be assimilated into the cage! Resistance is futile!
I totally get that you are a bit shocked by this. I am a student of AI and Computer Vision, and stuff like that got constantly better over the last couple of years. Personally, I find myself in a dilemma between the urge to work in the field and bring the research forward and having to ask myself at anything I do or want to do: "Could this be used for some sort of malicious activity?" And most of the time, the answer, sadly, is yes.
Maybe AI research is the nuclear physics research of the 21st century in that sense.
I don't think you have to worry about sophisticated AI coming from artificial neural networks for the time being, unless you have a brilliant reinforcement network or other system on how to teach it to modify it's own neurons without garbling the output.
I think you are right (else we would almost inevitably already know), but I do worry about some years into the future, when (if ever) AGI is possible. Humans are not made to think in exponentials, but progress does not care about our limitations in imagination.
I admire that you're developing with the ethical consideration behind your work.
please stay in the field. the fact that you recognize the ethical issues means you have the potential to stop future abuses.
So by 2060 we'll all be told that AI is poison and is too dangerous to be anywhere near?
Got recommend this again 5 years later. Today you can not only do the face swap really easy. You don't even need to have footage of another body as you can generate it now. So all you need is just one picture of the targets face. I think this was right on the money of where we are heading.
One picture of a face isn't nearly enough, unless all you're trying to do is generate an image variation with the face in the exact same position. Deepfake requires a ton of reference images, so that it can learn the intricacies of different angles and facial expressions.
@@peterlewis2178 there are some techniques using control net that can get away with a single image for a lora on someones face.
@@jmsether It still couldn't get it perfectly, though. It's physically impossible, because when you only have one angle of a face, there simply isn't enough visual detail to accurately predict the full shape.
If you're just generating an image, it might be good enough to be believable, especially if the angle is similar to the reference image, but if it was a video it absolutely wouldn't work. There would be too many differences in facial shape because of the lack of information.
@@peterlewis2178I have just two words: try Roop
@@peterlewis2178I have experimented with the same face from different reasonable angles, it all works perfectly regardless
I was expecting that it'd turn out your face had been swapped for the entire video at the end in a big twist. But then I saw the uh... results, and they were... yeah.
500 images seems like too low of a dataset for a training algorithm.
The scary part is how far this concept of deepfakes have come since this video, so far that I don't think even tom himself thought was possible at the time.
Imagine the libraries of dead actors and actresses which Hollywood already has access to, and they've already proven unscrupulous about their usage. The sociopathic tendencies of a corporation or government is definitely far more terrifying than the capacity of a few basement dwellers. When this becomes weaponized by real money and power we'll get a real taste of what fruits this yields.
ShiltoCrarpo the next allan walker won't be such a big dealbreaker
Government > few basement dwellers
Even more basement dwellers > Government
Hollywood studio stables....RISE!
Government bad
but hollywood allready has this technollogy (or rather computers, editing tallent and budget to pull it of without the software)
The placement of Matt's channel's icon was brilliant!
2018: Deepfakes are scary.
2020: everybody singing BAKA MITAI.
This comment needs more likes.
No u
Doesnt change the point
people are still going to do bad stuff, even if people make funny stuff
Even a mushroom cloud sings Bakamitai.
You know what, I think there is an upside.
If this technology becomes popular enough, we will accept that video footage is not definitive evidence. Maybe this kind of blackmailing will turn into the email spam of the future. Even if someone has real footage of you, who is going to believe that it's real?
Yes, that is true but the downside is that no one would believe real evidence. For example you want to prove to your friends that you met this super cool celebrity, but no one would believe. And in the long run this would make proving evidence to be true a real pain.
@@adwaitjadhav5016 it already is soooo
@@StaringLongingly it would just make it worse. what kind of reasoning was that?
that's bad too. you have a video evidence of a crime, but can't use it.
@@polina-rs4lr good point, better than the celebrity one
Using different frames of the same video was the problem, you need many different lighting scenarios, difference lens perspectives could be useful, and some more significant differences in the angles you see the face from. You could redo this and use several different videos and maybe film each other just moving lights around, and using the same images with different white balances, and you'd get perfect results.
oBLACKIECHANoo Exactly, I think you are right. Now someone is probably going to do the swap for him and send it in.😀
This video really aged. And its only 1 year old. With al the deepfake stuff
Took the words outs of my mouth. A subconscious recall of this video made me a little suspicious about using the recent facebook utilities.
Monsieur_Chinchilla Tech ages and grows really fast, even faster than kids sometimes.
His arguments did not age a lick.
At this point the only way to avoid deepfakes and the like is to not post online, or at least have every account set to private
The reason that Nick Cage clip looks so good is probably because of how many images, videos and a lot of other stuff that he is in, exists. The large ammount of variety in data about him just makes it easier for the AI to work it's magic. And sure, you did use every frame in the reference video for this, but that is still just one source. That's why this trend is so popular with famous people right now, because they are always exposed by cameras all the time, and that helps this program. But I fear the day that this thing gets advanced enough for it to work with anyone and any picture
Oh definetly. I'm just saying that targetting celebrities is much easier in this situation, but normal people are also at risk
500 distorted images of Matt Parker is a very scary thing to end up with.
6:26 damn that faceswap
Yea it’s very realistic
Underrated
500 frames are really not enough for it. I imagine it would take along the lines of 7000 frames.
Box Fan DATA OVERKILL
@@suwinkhamchaiwong8382 I don't think you can give AI too much data
2018: deepfakes will bring the dystopia
2020: DAME DA NE, DAME YO DAME NANO YO
somerandomdudeable The dystopia seems to have arrived earlier than expected, just like the deepfake algorithm surprised Tom
COUNTER AI NOW
just because some people do fun stuff with the technology doesn't mean that no one is doing the scary stuff
@@polina-rs4lr if someone is fun stuff with technology now, someone else is already doing scary stuff. We just havent heard about yet.
people are still going to do bad stuff, even if people make funny stuff
Imagine the meme potential though. Nicolas Cage movie but every one is Nicolas Cage except for Nicolas Cage
YES
mario is now nicolas.
DALL-E thumbail. Always ahead of the curve Tom
Technology is our new evolutionary pressure. Instead of needing evolve physically in order to survive our harsh environment, we need to evolve socially in order to survive our rapidly increasing technological level.
FlesHBoX an evolution of consciousness
No humans have come to the end of our evolutionary tree. Soon we will join our consciousness with theirs or we will perish.
Why would you think that? 😶
Unfortunately it seems to be having the exact opposite effect on our society
A friend and I did a deepfake, switching our faces over. We both felt really self concious and uncomfortable after it...and we CHOSE to do it!
> mind you so did Matt
Brilliant
its crazy to think that only 4 years down the line after this video MrGreeen is making realistic deepfakes of mark rober and nilered
Maybe revisit this subject on today ?
Everyone should keep a tattoo that nobody else knows about, you know... Just incase we get blackmailed
@@aproe610 better than nothing
If you got a birthmark that counts too right?
Then they could claim that you only got that tattoo after, and the evidence gets thrown out.
@@The360MlgNoscoper I have the weirdest birthmark so I’m good
@@moosetwin9023 What evidence?
"a fun app that lets you put your face in movies" Tom is a Psychic Wizard from Jupiter and nobody can convince me otherwise
I actually liked the dogs braking in the background. To me that was exactly the upbeat note missing from the human content…
Technological developments always race ahead of our ability to deal with them on a legal, moral and ethical level. Before Napster and BitTorrent there was "Home Taping is Killing Music" but almost twenty years later we're still arguing about the legality and ethics of sharing songs and movies online. And back then, it wasn't a concern for most people. Unless you were an up-and-coming musician, this wasn't a worry. We now have 3D printers and are starting to worry about the ownership of anything designed on a computer. We're worrying about 3D printed firearms and home-grown gene-spliced organisms. This was always a problem for humanity. Our ability to *Do* always outstrips our ability to *Undo*. The only thing is... In the past a thing like the longbow would come along, and we'd have decades before it was widespread and centuries to think about things before the next development came along. Now new developments are popping up yearly and we're not assimilating them fast enough. It makes everything more stressful and increases the heavy-handedness of the approach of lawmakers.
But we're not dead yet.
Mark Townsend certainly. The fact there is a video in a comment section - the very existence of youtube itself is so mind blowing. I guess our questions of privacy today will be considered a cultural hangup to future generations. Still feels weird living throught it though.
This is personal. And political.
The problem is that the current government structures are not concerned about the wellbeing of their citizens, and they will just regulate things to retain control, like always. The entire system needs to change, and people need to accept and learn to work with the technology not simply put it into a metaphorical cage
What scary tho is the people who eventually develop the app friendly version Tom is talking about probebly would have no intention of porn. They'd do it as it would be fun much like an emoji based messaging app, theyd make it because thyd want to see Nicolas cage as other characters for example, but when the dark side of the internet got hold of it, and news media named them as the creators of "the revenge porn app" (not its real name but what the editor of news decided to be more catchy) their lives would be changed forever.
Snapchat already has a face swap. and there are face swap phone apps.
Don Feik It's true, whether or not it makes you feel good. If you're not afraid of being in porn, you'll be happier in the future than someone who is afraid.
@@Clean.Eastwood or do what I do, and be happy knowing that nobody would want porn with my face in it. :D
@@erravi Yes, however that's only live faceswapping and works by editing in the face, is very glitchy and doesn't account for where either of the people are looking.
This is not.
@@skepticmoderate5790 If you're not afraid of being stolen from, or kidnapped, or killed, you'd also be a happier person. Also, your username is laughable.
bruh this video was so ahead of its time
Wait, does this far-from-perfect faceswap counts as.... Parker Faceswap?
Yes, yes it does.
A gourmet's meme; excellently seasoned and perfectly suited. Such savory and crisp memery.
XD
Nice try Matt Parker, but I could tell it was you all along. Tom Scott isn't silly enough to believe that there's actually people on the internet; he's aware that we're all cats.
curiousinternals did your cat write that?
No, it was his human. Silly cat!
video hits diff
I love how the channel icon at the end with Matt's face shows up on top of Tom's, that's incredible and I hope it was intentional
I think it was, simply based on the fact it's so out of line with the rest
2 years later it literally is an app where you can put yourself into movies.
Time to invent a video format that comes packaged with cryptographic signatures.
No, just put it in the subtitles. No one uses subtitles, & deaf people won't need them in the future
just a rock I always use subtitles
@just a rock I use subtitles
@@just_a_rock I use subtitles whenever I can. you can heck off
@@just_a_rock as a non-native english speaker (like so 90+% of the world) I use subtibles for everything, subtitles in proper english.
While I can read english almost perfectly, i can't understand all the nuances of a native speaker talking fast and all the regional accents and on and on, so having subtitles is essential, they're always on.
"500 distorted images of Matt Parker"
LMAO
What a great prédiction of the ReFace app 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Booting an old computer to do something and then have windows update annoy the hell out of you is extremely relatable
Seems like only 500 frames isn't enough training data?
Reading between the lines, more than 500 frames might've given his old rig a mental breakdown.
This + Adobe Voco + VR = talk to and hang out with anyone living or dead
I'll give it a decade and it will be a household name.
Tom in Feb 2018: "It'll be a fun app about putting your face in movies"
Reface in July 2020: "Good idea."
And now it can be done with a filter on SnapChat.
2018: This technology can and will be used without ethics or morals.
2020: *DAME DAMEEE, DAMEDO DAME DAMEDO*
why does nobody get the lyrics right aaa
@@JayAreAitch I try
people are still going to do bad stuff, even if people make funny stuff
The only time i heard that song was in a chess vid where 2 people played so terribly i wanted to bleach my eyes.
Your single take videos are incredible. It really highlights all the research, forethought and scripting you put into the production, and result is amazing.
4:58 has become real now in 2020-2021.
That's a real parker square of a face swapping job!
Damn, nice to be reminded that this didn't used to be a regular thing.
Are Southern trains running again? or are you using that train-swapping software?
Southern trains are never running
Trains don't run, silly. They don't even have legs.
Southern rail logic
We dont need to run trains, they dont have no legs!
Those are some nice Electrostars you got there 👌
@@danieldelport1537 Don't repeat jokes
You should’ve used Matt’s face from Park Bench episodes and would probably get a better result.
Someone should do this, actually.
Nope Nope
Matt Parker has been on a couple of park benches.
OriginalPiMan not Matt Parker, Matt Gray. There are BAJILLION episodes of Park Bench.
Ahmes Syahda
I was responding to "nope nope", they said "twas a different Matt". I was just pointing out that Matt Parker had been on the bench too.
That face... from that video would be perfect
i genuinely got an ad for a faceswap program directly after this video
Knowledge and technology is neither good nor evil. How it's used is what makes it good or evil.
Some technology, of course, has greater potential for good or for evil. Such as antibiotics and firearms.
Though it's nearly impossible to prevent new technology from being developed, and any technology that is developed WILL be used, so all we can really do is plan ahead for what appears to be on the horizon. And try not to be horrible about it.
IRS_Agent fire arms are good? The sole purpose is to injure another human, animal, or property
Implying that you think that antibiotics are mostly evil?
There is no greater cause than cageification
Again, it's how the technology is used. The vast majority of firearm owners use them for good. Vaccines are used for good to help protect us from disease.
Had to come back here after what has happened these days
You have a talent for explaining complicated things in a simple way.
We need captain disillusion to weigh in on this.
Tom Scott crossover episode with Captain Disillusion, and Mister Peanutbutter.
16by80 i believe captain talked about this on the h3h3 podcast
He did, and he pointed out that it's being overblown and hyped up by the media.
I could see it.
Big Boy we so need a collab. Also, link please?
I have just stumbled across your videos ... they are excellent ! Entertaining, informative, and very very interesting. I am looking forward to watching them all !
Future Shock === Current Shock.
this is 4chan in a nutshell
"please deepfake my sister"
Im dead
I only now noticed what you did with Matt Parker's icon in the end card. Truely fantastic.
It's 2022 and its an app and you can upload them to tiktok.
That is something that I never thought of. People often decide what is wrong by drawing the line to just beneath what they are willing to do. A profound thought.
Well.
HEYO
Well, well, well,
Let me say that I think you are doing great work
Shoop Da Woop "temporarily distracted by Nicolas Cage" lmfao, this is great
Thanks Shoop.
how far we had come in 5 years
watching this when it came out was scary and now faceswap is just a thing that people on tiktok use for blunt comedy
There's literally an app for this now.
Fayaz P. A. What’s it called?
@@madgy Doubicat
Dame da ne
People used to Photoshop to swap an actress face on a porn pic, I don't see how this is any more alarming.
RhinoBlindado I think we tend to believe video a lot more than a photo
It's insane that this video essentially predicted the Reface app.