Sure! Together with Fischer, my favorite player. Still, too bad Tal has a losing record against Korchnoi. If Tal would have played his world championship match against Korchnoi, it would have been Korchnoi, the new world champion. Don’t like it, but….
Time and again I am struck by the two ways of analyzing a game. (1) CONSEQUENCE/RESULT oriented. What do the moves (plans) do, and what would happen if this or another move is made? (2) DEVELOPMENT/GENESIS oriented. How does a player think of this or that move (plan)? You did a very good job of trying to get at both, but still focused more on the former -- understandable with a player like Tal, when the consequences are so intensely complicated and in need of explanation. Additionally, it's probably impossible to get inside their heads to understand how they came up with various plans, without talking to them right after the game. I personally wonder how Tal came up with 18. h4! Clearly it protects the bishop, allows the rook lift, and makes the passed pawn itself more powerful by advancing. So many other moves to be considered, but how do you find moves like this? It's amazing! Thanks for your thoughtful analysis. I am always absorbed by your videos, and learn so much. :)
Thank you for an excellent presentation of this wonderful game. I much prefer bold exciting attacking (unorthodox?) Chess than the methodical boring march to perfection. So its no surprise the Wizard of Riga is one of my favorites.
I seen mistakes by tal. For one ,he did not have control over f4 like you said he did after pawn recaptures.. an exchange of pieces and black queen ends up on f4...
Tal was tricky and his opponents failed to play their own game but be dragged into his. Full of inaccuracies and chance taking. Very entertaining,not so accurate.
Tal's King movement is extraordinary.
How could Tal not be your favorite player? Just ridiculously talented and entertaining.
Sure! Together with Fischer, my favorite player. Still, too bad Tal has a losing record against Korchnoi. If Tal would have played his world championship match against Korchnoi, it would have been Korchnoi, the new world champion. Don’t like it, but….
@aldamialca Both excellent players and Korchnoi too.
I like some of his games but his style is too risky to apply on the board.
@@irfanyamashita7184 that's how good Tal was
Because Bobby Fischer
Chessdawg is my favorite chess channel right now.
Keep them tal games coming 🎉
Time and again I am struck by the two ways of analyzing a game. (1) CONSEQUENCE/RESULT oriented. What do the moves (plans) do, and what would happen if this or another move is made? (2) DEVELOPMENT/GENESIS oriented. How does a player think of this or that move (plan)?
You did a very good job of trying to get at both, but still focused more on the former -- understandable with a player like Tal, when the consequences are so intensely complicated and in need of explanation. Additionally, it's probably impossible to get inside their heads to understand how they came up with various plans, without talking to them right after the game. I personally wonder how Tal came up with 18. h4! Clearly it protects the bishop, allows the rook lift, and makes the passed pawn itself more powerful by advancing. So many other moves to be considered, but how do you find moves like this? It's amazing!
Thanks for your thoughtful analysis. I am always absorbed by your videos, and learn so much. :)
Thank you for an excellent presentation of this wonderful game. I much prefer bold exciting attacking (unorthodox?) Chess than the methodical boring march to perfection.
So its no surprise the Wizard of Riga is one of my favorites.
Botvinnik was a loyal devotee of Capablanca, but Tal proved that pioneers have their place too. A masterpiece indeed.
Good job man, I love your videos. Short and sweet.... and very instructive. Cheers,
thanks so much, I've been waiting
Thank's for presenting a game from the tournament I requested!
Tal the talented magician
What a crazy game! Thx for uploading!
What a game! Hats off to Tal! 💪
LOVE Tal's crazy chess! ❤
Throw the Dawg a Bone! Excellent and passionate analysis!
As good as Tal was...World Champ even, Bobby Fischer was too much for him.
Well fischer is far from his peak though in 1959
Tal's record vs Fischer: +4 -4 =5
super review thank you
Fisher didn’t like the idea of giving up the black square bishop I agree
really outstanding ang shocking😂
I wish chess could be changed again like this, but alas those days are gone
Like Tal's games and your chess chenal.
I seen mistakes by tal. For one ,he did not have control over f4 like you said he did after pawn recaptures.. an exchange of pieces and black queen ends up on f4...
Only to Botvinik mauled him a year later...
Farkımız var mı😊varsa o da ilgisizliktir😊hiç bir şeye dikkat ettiğimiz yok😊ortak noktamız😊
but my move ba8 is the greatest chess move of all time, we analysed it with IM levy rozman, simple moves and idea but one of a kind themes
..close encounters..
🙏🏽
Bay stockfish😊
tal was the paul morphy of 20th century...🎤🎤💪💪
the point is that nobody was paul morphy besides paul morphy. I'm glad he's getting so much recognition these days however.
Morphy didn't have a "Botvinnik" to play. He was in an era by himself. Nothing to do but speculate how he would have done against other greats.
Ben hesap makinesiyim ya siz😊
Tal was tricky and his opponents failed to play their own game but be dragged into his. Full of inaccuracies and chance taking. Very entertaining,not so accurate.