What a liberating talk. Of course G-d is beyond all of our human-reasoning based 'laws' of existence. It feels so good to be free from overthinking. We come as little children to a love, and trust Him despite knowing that we don't understand much.
I just shared your talks with my Spiritual Director who is a Franciscan nun and she Loved it and is very much and shared it with a hermit friend and she loved too. All systems go. Thank you Rabbi so very much 🌹💐🌸❤️
I am also interested in what the woman in your audience speaks , but she can't be heard although there are times when you respond to her and affirm what she says and I get a yearning to know what she said .
There's a problem with the claim that the existence of something implies a Creator. You could take that a step further and claim that the existence of a Creator implies a Creator of the Creator. And so on. When we say that the Creator had always existed - well, we could claim that the Universe has always existed. I'm not claiming any such thing. Just that the arguments are flawed.
I think the argument is a bit deeper. You're still arguing within the framework of something existing. The rabbi is arguing that the very fact of anything (even a god of any sorts, something he mentions early on in the lecture) existing has to come as a result of something NOT LIMITED to ...well, limitation, having preceded it. Your suggesting that it's a neverending chain is missing the point being made. One thing prior to another isn't the point.. It's that something has to precede the very concept of a "something." Something = limitation, IOW, limited by time and space. It wasn't, now it is. It is only here, but not there; it is everywhere at once, but not at a single place; and so on. So the above description of limitation includes any description of a Creator being prior to another Creator. But, again, you can't describe something by its own limitation. A Creator of the universe would have to be unlimited by His own creation, meaning that limitation (including time and space, and thus anything coming BEFORE Him) cannot limit Him, as it is HIS OWN CREATION. And, again, something can't be limited by its own creation, that would be an oxymoron.
There are various aspects to G-d as He/She relates to His (...) universe. Certainly there's the feminine aspect, but typically we are discussing G-d in a sense of influencing, which is obvious in the context of _creating_ the world, and the influencer is the masculine aspect of the world. Thus, it is typical to refer to G-d, in the influencer sense, as a He -- though certainly G-d isn't limited to any particular gender, needless to say
Allah says in Al Quran.. It is not fitting for a man that Allah should speak to him except.. a. by inspiration b. from behind a veil c. by sending of a messanger.. a prophets or angels for Allah He is Most High Most Wise
The LIFE of GOD is The LIGHT of MAN, which is "LIFE The Real Self" a lamb of GOD. If you deny "LIFE The Real Self", and give your fullest attention to the flesh, you are at variance with GOD. The human GENOME contains DOUBLE LOGIC, so do NOT follow after the flesh.
we don't write G-d's name in a regular sentence nor a verse from the torah that we suspect to be erased since it is a prohibition to erase g-ds name in vain .
What if God wanted to experience his creation? He would have to be born into this world and be bound by its rules in the flesh, but because he is God he can do anything, even in a human incarnation. Do you think this is why he created the world and everything in it?
If there is a god how come it did manifest himself or show itself to its creature. God can manifest itself in a trillion of ways how come he did not want to be seen. Is god real or a making of humankind.
Any word , by itself , can not proof anything. The word God , by itself , does not proof any thing. Other things may be clues to a creator but the word God proves nothing at all , Rabbi
What a liberating talk. Of course G-d is beyond all of our human-reasoning based 'laws' of existence. It feels so good to be free from overthinking. We come as little children to a love, and trust Him despite knowing that we don't understand much.
Thank you Rabbi for this beautiful teaching
Your teaching teach me a lot about HaShem bless HaShem
Your my favorite rabbi, don't let the others know
This is a hold new world 🌎 for me thank you Rabbie
only chosen people is you guys and I really accept it. because of this class...
I just shared your talks with my Spiritual Director who is a Franciscan nun and she
Loved it and is very much and shared it with a hermit friend and she loved too. All systems go. Thank you Rabbi so very much 🌹💐🌸❤️
What an amazing talk the depth is astounding wow thank you rabbi Friedman
It a hold new word or Universe. Very beautiful. Wow! 👍🌹💐🌸👍
What proof does any one needs. You are the proof. ------ !!!!!
Thank you.
It was a beautiful,deep and enlightening lecture.!!!
Brilliant
I won say Thangs you Thangs you- I lesn you first time and you for my so special - - Marcela
I am also interested in what the woman in your audience speaks , but she can't be heard although there are times when you respond to her and affirm what she says and I get a yearning to know what she said .
There's a problem with the claim that the existence of something implies a Creator. You could take that a step further and claim that the existence of a Creator implies a Creator of the Creator. And so on.
When we say that the Creator had always existed - well, we could claim that the Universe has always existed.
I'm not claiming any such thing. Just that the arguments are flawed.
I think the argument is a bit deeper. You're still arguing within the framework of something existing. The rabbi is arguing that the very fact of anything (even a god of any sorts, something he mentions early on in the lecture) existing has to come as a result of something NOT LIMITED to ...well, limitation, having preceded it. Your suggesting that it's a neverending chain is missing the point being made. One thing prior to another isn't the point..
It's that something has to precede the very concept of a "something." Something = limitation, IOW, limited by time and space. It wasn't, now it is. It is only here, but not there; it is everywhere at once, but not at a single place; and so on.
So the above description of limitation includes any description of a Creator being prior to another Creator.
But, again, you can't describe something by its own limitation. A Creator of the universe would have to be unlimited by His own creation, meaning that limitation (including time and space, and thus anything coming BEFORE Him) cannot limit Him, as it is HIS OWN CREATION. And, again, something can't be limited by its own creation, that would be an oxymoron.
if God does not have a physical body in a human sense ...why is God He?
if you want to describe an object "it" you still use the masculinum in hebrew, so you say "he" but actually mean "it"
I used to wonder the whole he thing to. Dominik comment/answer was right on!
There are various aspects to G-d as He/She relates to His (...) universe. Certainly there's the feminine aspect, but typically we are discussing G-d in a sense of influencing, which is obvious in the context of _creating_ the world, and the influencer is the masculine aspect of the world. Thus, it is typical to refer to G-d, in the influencer sense, as a He -- though certainly G-d isn't limited to any particular gender, needless to say
What is Hassidiss?
Bride Groom and Bride Solomon's Song
Hashem and his chosen
Allah says in Al Quran.. It is not fitting for a man that Allah should speak to him except..
a. by inspiration
b. from behind a veil
c. by sending of a messanger.. a prophets or angels
for Allah He is Most High Most Wise
Allah just a myth....
GO TELL ALLAH TO BE NICE TO THE JEWS
The LIFE of GOD is The LIGHT of MAN, which is "LIFE The Real Self" a lamb of GOD.
If you deny "LIFE The Real Self", and give your fullest attention to the flesh, you are at variance with GOD.
The human GENOME contains DOUBLE LOGIC, so do NOT follow after the flesh.
Allah who created earth in two days , He measures therein all things to give them nourishment in four days..
This talk makes me feel very little 😘
Why do you write "G-d" using hyphen? Is this on purpose?
we don't write G-d's name in a regular sentence nor a verse from the torah that we suspect to be erased since it is a prohibition to erase g-ds name in vain .
What if God wanted to experience his creation? He would have to be born into this world and be bound by its rules in the flesh, but because he is God he can do anything, even in a human incarnation. Do you think this is why he created the world and everything in it?
If He can do anything, why can't He experience His creation without a physical body? No, really. Your statement doesn't make sense.
erm... He did that 2,000 years ago in Bethlehem
@@marcokite correct.
Can G-d touches H-self?
Who created god.Did god create himself?
If there is a god how come it did manifest himself or show itself to its creature. God can manifest itself in a trillion of ways how come he did not want to be seen. Is god real or a making of humankind.
Can I forget the horrors of my childhood??
Claudia Robichaud U2
I'm plagued withPTSD from mine
@@robertgoldstein52 You can move on with life if you turn your back on where you come from and turn toward The One Anointed.
Would we recognize GOD if we saw Him?
Any word , by itself , can not proof anything. The word God , by itself , does not proof any thing. Other things may be clues to a creator but the word God proves nothing at all , Rabbi