The Complex Launch Of The Queen Elizabeth Megaship | Britain's Greatest Ships | Big Ships!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 лют 2024
  • The Queen Elizabeth was built in Italy due to the closure of British shipyards. The ship's components were prefabricated off-site and assembled in a dry dock, allowing for a quick six-month construction period. Despite an eight-week delay, the shipyard aimed to meet the tight deadline, adding a night shift and emphasizing meticulous coordination.
    Welcome aboard Big Ships! We are your port of call for a captivating voyage through the giants of naval history. From the legendary ships of antiquity to colossal cargo carriers, we promise an ocean of content to quench your thirst. Anchors aweigh!
    Discover the past on History Hit, with ad-free exclusive podcasts and documentaries released weekly and presented by world-renowned historians Dan Snow, Suzannah Lipscomb, Matt Lewis and more. Get 50% off your first 3 months with code 'BIGSHIPS': historyhit.com/subscription
    For any enquiries please email owned-enquiries@littledotstudios.com
    Big Ships! is part of the History Hit Network.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 105

  • @ksig219
    @ksig219 5 місяців тому +13

    I hope they make one on the Queen Anne construction too.

  • @GrumpyOldMan9
    @GrumpyOldMan9 4 місяці тому +11

    Italy building Britain's greatest ship. The 4th dimension does exist.

    • @taphiro7436
      @taphiro7436 4 місяці тому +2

      In fact i was wondering why it's getting built in Italy instead of Southampton or UK

  • @knutarneaakra6013
    @knutarneaakra6013 5 місяців тому +24

    An ocean liner is something quite different than this floating hotel😊

    • @MrBibi86
      @MrBibi86 4 місяці тому +4

      those huge new cruise ships look so tacky.

    • @GermanGreetings
      @GermanGreetings 4 місяці тому +2

      The bow-section... ok, although i like the rounded front of QM II far more.
      And a propos: after building Queen Mary for Cunard, WHY ist the stern of the Queen Elizabeth as ugly, as most of the modern cruiseships ?

    • @legioner9
      @legioner9 4 місяці тому +1

      @@GermanGreetings The stern of Queen Mary 2 at least is also very ugly, I agree it prettier than all cruise ship's sterns.

    • @wickedcabinboy
      @wickedcabinboy 4 місяці тому +1

      @@GermanGreetings - More passengers. More passengers = more money. It's not a big dark secret. What other reason could there be?

    • @GermanGreetings
      @GermanGreetings 4 місяці тому

      @@wickedcabinboy Did you see the video about the construction of QM II ? My comment was only about the natural stability towards waves VS bow and waves VS stern - not for the Mediterranian or the Baltic Sea of course... but for those ships, who cruise in the Atlantic...
      You are right of course: the money-making aspects are first... so the bubble gums get bigger and bigger :)

  • @marktaylor1801
    @marktaylor1801 5 місяців тому +2

    Wonderful !

  • @happyslappy5203
    @happyslappy5203 4 місяці тому +7

    MS Queen Elizabeth is classified as a cruise ship, not an ocean liner. Queen Mary 2 is a true Atlantic liner, still the largest: 345 metres length (MS Queen Elizabeth: 294 metres length). Queen Mary 2 was built by French shipbuilders in St Nazaire in 2004. Some of the biggest cruise ships were built in St Nazaire: 2015 Harmony of the Seas (362 meters. 226,963 GT, world record)
    2018 Symphony of the Seas (362 meters. 228,081 GT, world record)
    2020 Wonder of the Seas (362 meters. 236,857 GT, world record)
    And St Nazaire shipbuilders will build the largest cruising sailboat in the world, 220 meters long.

  • @LMays-cu2hp
    @LMays-cu2hp 4 місяці тому

    Looking very nice!! Thank you for sharing.😊😊

  • @meadpro
    @meadpro 5 місяців тому +1

    Oh I'm gonna enjoy this episode

  • @andybrown6981
    @andybrown6981 4 місяці тому

    Looks wonderful cruising in the open water

  • @MrFroglips69
    @MrFroglips69 4 місяці тому

    Groovy episode.

  • @marcom2248
    @marcom2248 5 місяців тому +7

    It's a shame that it was not build in the UK.

    • @nancyosterhaus5717
      @nancyosterhaus5717 4 місяці тому +1

      the QM2 was built in France.

    • @MrTomcat104
      @MrTomcat104 4 місяці тому +2

      Blame that on the decline of UK manufacturing. Uncompetitive compared to foreign shipyards which drove them all under eventually.

  • @mdstras
    @mdstras 5 місяців тому +8

    CRUISE SHIP! She’s no superliner!

  • @lh8372
    @lh8372 4 місяці тому +4

    Queen Mary 2 is the only Ocean Liner in the Cunard fleet of ships. All of their other ships are Cruise Ships

  • @tonyadeney1245
    @tonyadeney1245 5 місяців тому +2

    impressive - cunard fleet now believe four ships - queen anne, mary 2, victoria and elizabeth - as a student worked on a cruise ship in holidays - not cunard but something special about cunard the history, the ships .. maybe one day will do a cunard trip - did check and a few bargains if you are flexible in booking and tour venues ...

  • @drmarkcthompson6504
    @drmarkcthompson6504 5 місяців тому +10

    But she is not a liner

  • @skenzyme81
    @skenzyme81 4 місяці тому +1

    To be truly competitive, a new true ocean liner would need to be able to make the transatlantic crossing in under 72 hours. On the full Southampton to New York route, that would require an average speed of at least 44 knots. A massive catamaran/SWATH could get the job done.

  • @michaelbressette2599
    @michaelbressette2599 4 місяці тому

    WOW this is different, nothing like the old way of building a ship of this class. The paintings are spectacular or breathtaking almost lifelike depending how you view them. I can very much appreciate the work put into them as I once use to paint & sketch people, landscape & ships However, my ships where Starships, either way you have to be able to see what's not there IE: Shadows transparencies & illusionary alignments & of course a 3rd eye :)
    At time index 33:18 - 37:47 if you take a close look of what I meant about alignment is apparent. The Bow of the vessel doesn't quite line up with the with the bridge & forepeak, it looks kind of turned too much to the Port side & the evidence is very clear if you look at the entire bridge body & the point of the forepeak where the black. White & red paintwork meets & the stern section seems simply cut off. Other than that this painting is really beautiful.
    I am super impressed, I hope it has a safe & long sailing life.

  • @JWRogersPS
    @JWRogersPS 4 місяці тому +2

    "David Linley" is really David Armstrong-Jones, 2nd Earl of Snowdon. He's the nephew of the late Queen, and 1st cousin to King Charles.

  • @MiniMC546
    @MiniMC546 5 місяців тому +54

    MS Queen Elizabeth is a Cruise Ship, not an Ocean Liner...

    • @jerrymartin3965
      @jerrymartin3965 4 місяці тому +2

      In olden times, they were known as Ocean Liners. It's still an appropriate term as they are Trans Atlantic. Cruise ships go on relatively short junkets, not Trans Ocean.

    • @bayousbambino427
      @bayousbambino427 4 місяці тому +15

      @@jerrymartin3965 False. Ocean liners go from one point to another as fast as possible, on a regular schedule. Cruise ships make voyages that include multiple ports and take a long as desired. Cruise ships cross oceans--how the hell do you think they complete world cruises? They just don't cross oceans during storms; ocean liners do that, on the Atlantic or any other ocean. (Again, how do you think people, before the jet age, travelled from North America to Asia or Australasia, or from Europe to Australasia, and vice-versa?)

    • @jerrymartin3965
      @jerrymartin3965 4 місяці тому +6

      @bayousbambino427 you're wrong. Schedule has nothing to do with it. It's the distance. These ships have always been known as ocean liners. Cruise ship is a much newer term for those ships that do much shorter trips, a jaunt. You can work it out anyway you want in your head. You're just being childishly argumentative.

    • @bayousbambino427
      @bayousbambino427 4 місяці тому

      @@jerrymartin3965 LOL "These ships"? You don't even have a clue how ships are built, proven by the fact I alluded to the differences in construction--ocean liners have the strength and speed cross oceans, regardless of weather (you know, to keep that schedule), whereas cruise ships are not as strong and slower and, thus, seek ports or change route to avoid storms (you know, because schedule doesn't matter so much)--and you _still_ go on as if there's no fundamental differences between RMS _Queen Mary 2_ and MS _Queen Elizabeth_ ! And, yet, you're so convinced of your expertise in this area, you think you can tell me I'm wrong. Pathetic
      Learn a thing: ua-cam.com/video/w7mocEPIjjs/v-deo.html

    • @bayousbambino427
      @bayousbambino427 4 місяці тому +1

      @@jerrymartin3965 LOL "These ships"? You don't even have a clue how ships are built, proven by the fact I alluded to the differences in construction--ocean liners have the strength and speed cross oceans, regardless of weather (you know, to keep that schedule), whereas cruise ships are not as strong and slower and, thus, seek ports or change route to avoid storms (you know, because schedule doesn't matter so much)--and you still go on as if there's no fundamental differences between RMS Queen Mary 2 and MS Queen Elizabeth ! And, yet, you're so convinced of your expertise in this area, you think you can tell me I'm wrong. Pathetic
      Learn a thing: ua-cam.com/video/w7mocEPIjjs/v-deo.html

  • @DEVASTATOR478
    @DEVASTATOR478 4 місяці тому

    Robert Loidd is great !!

  • @DEVASTATOR478
    @DEVASTATOR478 4 місяці тому

    My favorite Is Always Queen Mary 2

  • @user-ni1uk4ie2w
    @user-ni1uk4ie2w 4 місяці тому +2

    Not only is the MS Queen Elizabeth a cruise ship, it looks like a Holland American ship. Lack of good looks.

    • @WitchKing-Of-Angmar
      @WitchKing-Of-Angmar 4 місяці тому +2

      5:22 really looks bad, it's not sleek, and the superstructure takes up the entire ship, with a small bowsprit section and a lack of any ship back. Whereas an oceanliner is comprised of tapered lines and elegant sculpting, juxtaposed a set a 1-4 funnels, Beautifully painted in the signature ranking strips of a modern world. I think the only modern ship to look elegant is the 1996-8 Disney magic. Truly beautiful.

    • @andrewwarcup684
      @andrewwarcup684 4 місяці тому

      Same class of ship. Standard Vista hull design.

  • @jimaccornero3688
    @jimaccornero3688 4 місяці тому +1

    I believe all the Cunard Queens have extra steel plates in their hull. Mary is the only true Ocean Liner. The other ships are built for cruising but capable of ocean crossings at a slower speed.

  • @Mikkel-of-Lolland.
    @Mikkel-of-Lolland. 4 місяці тому

    good comment.

  • @LAHRchitecture
    @LAHRchitecture 4 місяці тому +2

    A lovely Art Déco style liner…I love the interiors from the Golden Âge of Travel. No Karting, no water toboggan, 50 shops and adventure parc. For sure for a mature clientele, but it still is a ship an not an floating Adventure Park.

    • @bayousbambino427
      @bayousbambino427 4 місяці тому +2

      It's not a liner.

    • @forestghost7
      @forestghost7 4 місяці тому

      ​@@bayousbambino427no it's not, but at least it's not another hideous floating Walmart 🤮

    • @LAHRchitecture
      @LAHRchitecture 4 місяці тому +1

      @@bayousbambino427 : In fact I apologise for the mistake. Of course it is not a liner. What is the definition of a liner?
      1. : a ship or airplane of a regular transportation line. an ocean liner. 2.

    • @bayousbambino427
      @bayousbambino427 4 місяці тому +1

      @@forestghost7 True.

    • @bayousbambino427
      @bayousbambino427 4 місяці тому +1

      ​@@LAHRchitecture I was merely correcting the mistake I assumed you picked up from the video, which, wrongly, calls this ship an ocean liner. It's rather like calling a resort an airport hotel. (Only, in the pubic consciousness, the cachet is reversed--"liner" evokes more nostalgic, romantic associations than "cruise ship", despite liners having been the vessels that served a far more utalitarian purpose than cruise ships do.)

  • @iqbalindrafauzi5600
    @iqbalindrafauzi5600 4 місяці тому

    But the one and only Ocean Liner who still exist today is RMS Queen Mary 2

  • @hypercomms2001
    @hypercomms2001 4 місяці тому +1

    How did Fincantieri manage to survive and grow but the British yards did not?

    • @forestghost7
      @forestghost7 13 днів тому

      Because the UKs entire industrial base nuked itself in mid 70s till mid 80s by being on strike and burning things instead of working for 10 yrs ... sad how they brought it on themselves 😢

  • @wickedcabinboy
    @wickedcabinboy 4 місяці тому

    I'm wondering, what's the rush?

  • @DaveSoCal
    @DaveSoCal 4 місяці тому

    Amy is so “Los Angeles”

  • @jimcameron1451
    @jimcameron1451 4 місяці тому +1

    I thought I wa going to see a launch.

  • @PeterDunnPhotographer
    @PeterDunnPhotographer 4 місяці тому

    2010?

  • @leopoldodiaz2985
    @leopoldodiaz2985 4 місяці тому

    She ia Puertorican.OMG

  • @bayousbambino427
    @bayousbambino427 4 місяці тому +1

    Why keep calling this ship a liner? It's a cruise ship. The only liner in operation today is _Queen Mary 2_ .
    Also, along the same lines, but, reversed, it's gotta be worrying when your lead designer thinks Cunard had a "golden age of cruising". Is she referring to the 1980s? Glass block and pink neon light everywhere?

  • @OllieRamone
    @OllieRamone 4 місяці тому

    She is not built for the transatlantic trade, only the Queen Mary 2 is.

  • @christianhill9217
    @christianhill9217 4 місяці тому +1

    Why why why 😢put a decent stern on her

  • @porthill702
    @porthill702 4 місяці тому

    I watched for the launch, it never came.

  • @jeffpetrie7744
    @jeffpetrie7744 4 місяці тому

    The narrator refers to this ship as a liner. But she is not a liner, is she? Just checking...

  • @gillianmilton9209
    @gillianmilton9209 4 місяці тому

    She's not a cruise ship, she IS an ocean liner!

  • @tadshea3011
    @tadshea3011 4 місяці тому +1

    Just sink it over the Titanic see if it splits in two

  • @ianinvancouverbc
    @ianinvancouverbc 4 місяці тому

    built in Italy and owned by Americans - I blame Thatcher....

  • @MrBibi86
    @MrBibi86 4 місяці тому

    *Why do they always talk about The Queen Mary 2 but never mention the newest Queen Elizabeth?*

  • @geographyRyan
    @geographyRyan 4 місяці тому +4

    What was that awful thumbnail??

  • @waynemerlo7448
    @waynemerlo7448 5 місяців тому +2

    Owned by American company built by Italian company but it’s British………lol😂

    • @forestghost7
      @forestghost7 4 місяці тому

      does UK own anything anymore? proud to say I own 2 REAL 🇬🇧 classic cars, 80 MGB and 73 Aston Martin, no Chinese or Indian parts in em ... keeping them forever

    • @waynemerlo7448
      @waynemerlo7448 4 місяці тому +1

      @@forestghost7 Sounds like here in Canada. Our whole country has been sold off it seems.

  • @arrtee4707
    @arrtee4707 4 місяці тому

    Heh heh heh…Wouldn’t it be glorious to be a U-boat Captain back then..or even today’s modern submarine Captains…of all Navies in the world capable of having submarines…to be 1000yds away an let loose 4-6 800-1000pds warhead torpedoes…glorious indeed..

  • @pasqualerusso7050
    @pasqualerusso7050 4 місяці тому

    and she.s not a mega ship either...😂😂

  • @christianhill9217
    @christianhill9217 4 місяці тому

    Cheap ship 🚢 no crasmanship .6 months lol

  • @playwithmeinsecondlife6129
    @playwithmeinsecondlife6129 4 місяці тому

    American company. Italian ship. How sad for Britain.

  • @rol1517
    @rol1517 4 місяці тому

    It's not British at all though.

  • @e24m6
    @e24m6 4 місяці тому

    The architects and designers missed the mark on this one. It does not do the name proud Queen Elizabeth. It’s a cheap knock off.

  • @legioner9
    @legioner9 4 місяці тому +1

    The design of Queen Elizabeth is not nice. It is a cruise ship at the end of the day, which screams cheapness in manufacturing and design. And that stern section looks like crap. Shame. Cruise ships do not deserve the name of Queens.

    • @forestghost7
      @forestghost7 13 днів тому +1

      Yeah this makes me kinda sad ... I'm just old enough to have had the great privelege of traveling on both orig Queens ('67) and SS United States ('68 - 9), all in 1st class (I was ages 7 - 10) those trips are burned in my memory like yesterday, I feel bad for ocean liner fans who will never have that experience

    • @legioner9
      @legioner9 13 днів тому +1

      @@forestghost7 Wow, you have very nice memories. Good times back then I guess. I will try one day to travel with Queen Mary 2. I still dream & hope she will get a sister ocean liner.

    • @forestghost7
      @forestghost7 13 днів тому +1

      @@legioner9 reason for all those trans Atlantic trips was Dad had factories in NY and UK and dragged us with him. best memory - in '69, holding the SS United States' wheel for 1 hr and the capt ordering 35 knots as we literally smoked the Italian SS Rafaello mid ocean 😁 I'll tell you the worst when I have a few min

    • @legioner9
      @legioner9 13 днів тому

      @@forestghost7 That is very nice. Wonderful memories, and unique too.