You’re complaining about accuracy, but you put on the brawling commander. Put on a sniping commander and build into dispersion. Azur lane Commander would be best.
That’s why nobody should be listening to these CCs they complain about every ship and most of the time are wrong and always cry for nerfs 😆 the sap on this ship hits like a freight train not to mention it’s good accuracy with the right commander
I like spartan don't get me wrong but yea opinions are pretty shit at times. I like most of the Italian bbs I find them very accurate as dispersion builds and very good as 2ndary brawler builds. Cunningham, shanny,ichiano my dispersion commanders and all of my ships are pretty accurate that I use that build with. Lower tiers on and off with that build but at around 5 my build tends to start smacking the shit out of stuff
I think Iachino would be much better then AL Littorio...Littorio was ok when she was first released as that was all the Italians had for a battleship accuracy commander, but Iachino is much better in several slots when compared head-to-head with AL Littorio. However I do agree that the wrong commander build was used in this video along with a very small sample size of games played with this particular ship. It's not one of Spartan's better efforts, especially when I'm seeing videos by both Derka Games and Xarkun that demonstrate what the Lauria can and will do with a correct commander set-up and a bit more focus on targeting with those SAP shells.
I remember seeing Flamu do a patch notes video for pc a few years ago when this ship came out. When he saw it had 457 SAPs, he said cruisers would have zero defense against it, and summed it up for the cruisers as "fuck angling", because those big SAPs would tear cruisers to shreds even with angling 😂
Exactly! I just used with Colorado to much more DPS and just shredding with SAP instead AP. Brutal games i feel nerf soon. In legendary games many times you don't have a lot of opportunities going to flank, but who cares with SAP big guns.
And if that was the reason then that's being dishonest toward the viewers of this channel. Regardless of the cost of the ship, it should be presented without any personal bias when it's a review. If it's a good ship to play (it certainly is) then it's a great of ship to play regardless of the cost. However, one can say the ship is very good but not worth the sticker price, which is what Xarkun tactfully did with his video.
Not many people are going to be able to afford her because of WarGamings greed. Ohio was a $40 ship last year if you did the campaign, calendar and bought a 5x Santa crate bundle. If you do the campaign, complete the calendar and do all of the weekly mission and get the free holiday bundle then you will only have 8800 cyber cents or whatever they’re called which isn’t even nearly enough to effort R. Lauria. I don’t understand why it couldn’t have just been the same as last year. Now you have to spend over $100 in addition to all the other shit just to get some digital ship that they lazily ported from PC. And whales who use daddy’s credit card defend these egregious marketing practices which is the crazy part. No ship is worth that much money.
The SAP pen on this ship is just over 110mm aswell but SAP really loses effectiveness when your hitting parts of ships that are saturated or thicker armor then what you can pen. You can sure hurt other players if you can place your rounds well.
iachino is the only commander to use on italian battleships. wargaming intentionally gave russia, germany, italy, and japan dogshit accuracy. 3% reload time bonus is as worthless as every other 3% bonus, so you gotta go with accuracy to make the ships even useful. which is an odd move out of spite (wg is ukranian) seeing as how it was bolshevik jews (communists) from russia that killed like 30 million ukranians and russians prior to ww2, and hitler & the other nationalist countries were fighting against that. reckon wg never heard of holodomor or watched europa the last battle, knowing only what their government feds them. kinda like most americans and europeans.
Spartan is either misrepresenting the ship or genuinely bad if he thinks 457 mm SAP on the Lauria is “useless”. Had he fired it at the conq instead of the AP, he would have killed him in 3-4 salvos or less. What a dummy
I played in a game with you for the first time today! I watched you develop strike a Conquerer with your Defiance on two brothers it was awesome. We won which was great. (I was Musashi ) Always enjoy your content brotha!
I find that the sap slaps battleships, I use a full accuracy build with the accuracy commander, with sharn and cunning as inspirations Edit: Colorado not sharn
Have a sniper build on mine and it works well. Not perfect but it’s ok. The SAP shells i find good against bow tanking bb’s. i try to stay at medium range.
Good looking ship but it is prob gonna get dev struck more than Yama. Not only because its citadel is massive, but also because it’s yet another legendary tier ship that you can get with money (yaaaaaaaaaaay). Thus, all the potatoes are gonna play it.
This must be Spartan’s attempt to actively make the ship look bad to lower the people who will buy it. Seriously, for a supposed “battleship main” to be this out of touch with battleship reviews, is crazy. To review Lauria (a ship that is meant to be a mid-long range sniper with good camo), put a full brawler/reload build on it, never use the SAP, and then call it bad is appalling. The SAP vs the AP is pretty easy to understand. The SAP has more base damage and never overpens, but can’t citadel most things. For if what you’re shooting it you can’t/won’t citadel, use the SAP. It will always do more damage than the AP. If you can citadel, use the AP as it will do more than the SAP pen damage. AP is an accent to help the ship, and the fact that he uses it as the main ammo (and NEVER uses the SAP, wtf) is just throwing. If you can’t aim and make the SAP work, it’s simply a skill issue. On a BB, it’s totally superior to the AP unless you can citadel. Seriously Spartan, at least actually learn how to play the boat before reviewing it in the most ignorant way possible…
Did you know that SAP has to hit lightly-armored sections of the ship? Think fore and aft. It's annoying to use SAP, because you have to literally change how you're aiming, compared to AP.
One last thought on the Lauria and this is more along the lines of advice for anybody who plans to acquire this ship. Consider not using the Cyberpunk camo because said camo almost perfectly highlights for the shooter as to where to aim at that towering citadel. It might as well say "Aim Here Please" Also the gun turrets are rather brightly contrasted on a mostly dark ship...that's also earned helpful if one is aiming for the turrets so I humbly advise not going out there in that camo....use a different camo for cryin' out loud. Let's not make things easier for the Red Team. But hey, that's just me.
Well i took Iachino with DiRevel and AL Colorado And with SAP i shred everything for 20km. Absolutely awesome ship. SAP needs nerf it's brutal. Really don't know why Spartan used brawling DiRevel as main captain he is good for inspiration and only with SAP strategy. I don't feel this need more dispersion. But she'll grouping with Iachino is enough for me and also spotter helps well.
It still irritates me that the Iowa is gimped speed wise, balance Wargaming says yet there are plenty of Battleships that can do 33 knots or more in the game. It is a deliberate slight by the Devs.
This things a beast, are you sure your're using it right? I'm stressing out the entire server right now. Try it with my build. Upgrades -Aiming Systems -Rudder Shift -Concealment System -Main Battery Reload mod 3 Commander: Paolo di Ravel -Brawler -Artisans Touch -On second thought -Master Mechanic + Will to rebuild Inspirations -Andrew Cunningham -Robert Jaujard Ive got 86% winrate on 8 battles (I know small sample), Regularly getting 140k games, crusier can just pray when they meet you and I have a 19 SECOND RELOAD. That is terrifying with 18 inch guns.
Meet the Lauria. Did we meet the Lauria in this video? From a Critical Thinking perspective that answer would be no as a viewer...the sample size regarding matches played is much too small and the commander build is not in the Lauria's best interest. Granted, Italian BB's are not Spartan's cup of tea unless it's the Columbo. There is nothing wrong with SAP shells on the Lauria's main guns...Derka's video demonstrated this quite well...what SAP (main) shells require (on Italian BB's) is slightly more precise targeting... It's like hockey...some snipers will shoot less at the goal in search of the more perfect shot on goal...SAP mains kinda require the same discipline and such a dynamic is not for everyone for lots of reasons which can include things like patience and one's skill set. I'm told the Lauria has a 1.9 sigma (same as the Montana) with cruiser-ish dispersion. The few that I've played with out there (and against) have demonstrated this claim to be correct but....ya need Iachino as the main commander on the Lauria, not di Revel. Some ships are more challenging...American BB's, though most awesome, are Easy Button ships to play...the problem with them is that they do not promote 3 dimensional thinking...Metajerk is a classic example of a player who can wreck an opposing team with ships that many or most players would often dismiss (Gascogne anyone?) I think the Lauria is better than what we see in this video. Granted this video is an opinion piece and as with most opinions...they are subjective.
Lol 1.9 sigma is fine but comparing an 8 gun bb to a 12 gun bb is a bit of a goof.. Big difference as having 50% more stuff to throw at a target goes a long way towards improving the feel of the ships accuracy.. As for SAP yes it can be useful but as stated there are very few situations where I'd rather be shooting SAP from this BB than the AP simple as that
The guns on either the Lauria or the Columbo can't be compared, which s why I avoided doing just that.... Different caliber, different characteristics, it is apples to oranges. The commander build that you used along with your small sample size of games didn't showcase the Lauria accurately, which to me is rather surprising because you're generally more thorough than this. SAP mains on BB's require a slightly different thought process when targeting. Derka's video review of the Lauria touched on this rather well. It may be that your skillsets are not suited for ships of this kind and that's ok. I'm not able to get certain ships to work for me either.
I love how even if any Italian ship you play compares well to other ships, everytime you play a new Italian ship you only play it 5-10 damn times and call it shit. Italian ships require skill, I main Italy and do very well. Playing them only 5 times before a review doesnt do them justice and is just lazy.
The ship doesn't really have anything good other than the heal.. the SAP is a gimmick that works better on the Cruisers sure it can work but the accuracy is so bad and because it only has 8 guns shows all the wonky dispersion
The Russian cruiser is way ways better. Ik vendetta Rossa is a sexy ship but if your trying to win stay away from it and go with that Russian cruiser. In 3 battles I've already got 11 ships on my counter in standard battles.
listen iam sorry but the price is wayyyyy toooo high but iam def getting defence that ship lookes so nasty ON UPDATE day in pgs stream and he even said its so strong but its update day lol
Don't be sorry...i agree with you. The Lauria is an excellent battleship but the out of pocket cost of roughly $120 U.S. dollars to obtain the additional campaign currency, to make up the difference, is nothing short of obscene. I got the Defence and it's quite the monster to unleash onto the Red team, and I opted for the Tier V Dupleix, which is quite the cruiser killer, especially with those reload boosters. I've absolutely massacred Tier VI cruisers with those eight 203's. And it's kinda fast to. Gotta be careful though, it's bit of a glass cannon.
@ that’s for sure, the amount of open water rushing DD’s I’ve seen is quite damming I’m gonna say this to you man, about the SAP I know it seems potentially dookie, but treat It like really high pen HE Know the nature of the shell, especially how it pens 114mm or something Realistically it is supposed to be very powerful, and kind of a gimmick of the ship Not that I have the ship yet, it’s dam expensive so ima wait until I’ve accumulated cybercents
Uses op ship uses wrong commander does bad says ship is bad yep average spartan review for any italian ship. As an italian main spartan is just talking wack the ship is good he just refuses to use the correct build because it's italian if anyone plays italy you know you gotta have the build and the experience to use italy well, it isnt a bad ship and not a bad nation it's just spartan being bias as usual while ruining a perfectly good nation and their ships.
If this comment does get deleted by spatan I have picture proof that he is deleting comments that go against what he says dont listen to him he's just but hurt people are better at the game than he is and cant take any form of criticism.
Lol tell me you didn't watch the video without telling me you didn't watch the video.. I explain my reasoning for why I chose what I chose and I didn't call it a bad ship I just think the SAP is a gimmick that isn't as good on BBs as people like to say it is.. There is almost no scenario where firing SAP in this ship results in a better salvo than the AP The ships main selling point is 18" guns and a super heal
@@SpartanElite43 then you seriously do not know how to use SAP then, SAP is good against Light and medium armoured ships not BBs, AP is best with italian improved pen. Not mentioning the non use of the italian range commander worsening accuracy by a lot making SAP functionally useless at range with AP being better with range. Though I do agree the shell caliber is too large to use SAP effectively the shell cant be used as an AP substitute and needs mid to short range to get good hits in which Lauria cannot do as its a range BB not a brawler.
@spectre4399 that's just it though the ship has 457mm guns which overmatch most of the cruisers at L tier so why would you opt to shoot SAP at those targets instead of AP?
@spectre4399 lol why would I delete your comment? I have no problem talking with people who have differences of opinions.. The people that get banned on my channel are people who go out of their way to incite a reaction or attack others
@@thej3389 It will 100% get power crept when the buff the weaker ships at L tier. The SAP slaps any ship and the alpha on bot the AP and SAP is disgusting… if you know how to play it and flank properly this ship can easily put up 175k every match
I find it odd that there are now 2 Italian legendry cruisers and battleships, while several other tech tree lines have no legendary ships.
Dont forget that the USN already has most all of their legandary ships and everyone else is missing half there fleets
@@lord_crush777my guess would be they make a lot of money from American players. Money is king with wargaming.
@@lord_crush777 sell what's popular. That's the wargaming motto lol
Year 4 waiting for Hindenburg 🫠
@@captainchill903 but not Kremlin and Hindenburg right? 🙄
You’re complaining about accuracy, but you put on the brawling commander. Put on a sniping commander and build into dispersion. Azur lane Commander would be best.
That’s why nobody should be listening to these CCs they complain about every ship and most of the time are wrong and always cry for nerfs 😆 the sap on this ship hits like a freight train not to mention it’s good accuracy with the right commander
I like spartan don't get me wrong but yea opinions are pretty shit at times. I like most of the Italian bbs I find them very accurate as dispersion builds and very good as 2ndary brawler builds. Cunningham, shanny,ichiano my dispersion commanders and all of my ships are pretty accurate that I use that build with. Lower tiers on and off with that build but at around 5 my build tends to start smacking the shit out of stuff
I think Iachino would be much better then AL Littorio...Littorio was ok when she was first released as that was all the Italians had for a battleship accuracy commander, but Iachino is much better in several slots when compared head-to-head with AL Littorio.
However I do agree that the wrong commander build was used in this video along with a very small sample size of games played with this particular ship.
It's not one of Spartan's better efforts, especially when I'm seeing videos by both Derka Games and Xarkun that demonstrate what the Lauria can and will do with a correct commander set-up and a bit more focus on targeting with those SAP shells.
I remember seeing Flamu do a patch notes video for pc a few years ago when this ship came out. When he saw it had 457 SAPs, he said cruisers would have zero defense against it, and summed it up for the cruisers as "fuck angling", because those big SAPs would tear cruisers to shreds even with angling 😂
Bro using the wrong commander for absolutely no reason lmao
He had Paolo di Revel for that reload boost, it wasn't for no reason
I love how the skin gives us a perfect place to aim at for citadels.....
good eye.... bullseyes.... convenient....
if only there were other camos to use
22 second reload with 18" guns... holy dooley. Why not run Iachino with di revel and cunningham tho??
I think because he’s trying to make it look bad so people don’t get because the price is outrageous compared to Ohio last year
Exactly! I just used with Colorado to much more DPS and just shredding with SAP instead AP. Brutal games i feel nerf soon. In legendary games many times you don't have a lot of opportunities going to flank, but who cares with SAP big guns.
And if that was the reason then that's being dishonest toward the viewers of this channel.
Regardless of the cost of the ship, it should be presented without any personal bias when it's a review.
If it's a good ship to play (it certainly is) then it's a great of ship to play regardless of the cost.
However, one can say the ship is very good but not worth the sticker price, which is what Xarkun tactfully did with his video.
Not many people are going to be able to afford her because of WarGamings greed. Ohio was a $40 ship last year if you did the campaign, calendar and bought a 5x Santa crate bundle. If you do the campaign, complete the calendar and do all of the weekly mission and get the free holiday bundle then you will only have 8800 cyber cents or whatever they’re called which isn’t even nearly enough to effort R. Lauria. I don’t understand why it couldn’t have just been the same as last year. Now you have to spend over $100 in addition to all the other shit just to get some digital ship that they lazily ported from PC. And whales who use daddy’s credit card defend these egregious marketing practices which is the crazy part. No ship is worth that much money.
Everyone doesn’t need this ship I love mine 😆
So there's no possible get the Soviet VIII cruiser free? Just the french?
@@JackalEtheriasuit is, you only have to complete the path to the french cruiser and then you can buy the other cruiser
@ 10$ you can get the cruiser
Love these reviews that you do of the new ships they bring out! Gameplay was fire!🔥
Glad you liked it! How many Yamato can you take out with Baltimore
This is a battlecruiser not a battleship. This is a very strong ship. I recoomend you use Iachino.
The SAP pen on this ship is just over 110mm aswell but SAP really loses effectiveness when your hitting parts of ships that are saturated or thicker armor then what you can pen. You can sure hurt other players if you can place your rounds well.
Forgive me for not having watched the whole video but, perhaps Iachino would be good
Cunningham (or someone else) and definitely kondo as inspirations
iachino is the only commander to use on italian battleships. wargaming intentionally gave russia, germany, italy, and japan dogshit accuracy. 3% reload time bonus is as worthless as every other 3% bonus, so you gotta go with accuracy to make the ships even useful. which is an odd move out of spite (wg is ukranian) seeing as how it was bolshevik jews (communists) from russia that killed like 30 million ukranians and russians prior to ww2, and hitler & the other nationalist countries were fighting against that. reckon wg never heard of holodomor or watched europa the last battle, knowing only what their government feds them. kinda like most americans and europeans.
This ship is cracked.. stay at medium to long range and let those SAP shells cook. 150k-175k avg
Dude true, I have the ship, dude I get 100k damage minimum
It’s cracked af
Terror tactics is peak gaming , red October is one of my favorite people to play with , he’s just so potent
Haha I like the TT guys but they've been giving me a bad time recently with Red and his chkalov
This time though I got a little pay back
I think you're underestimating the sap on that beast, spartan
Ive been seeing some insane dmg out of them, from PQ on pc and PG on legends
Yes! He just doesn’t know what he’s talking about
Spartan is either misrepresenting the ship or genuinely bad if he thinks 457 mm SAP on the Lauria is “useless”. Had he fired it at the conq instead of the AP, he would have killed him in 3-4 salvos or less. What a dummy
I played in a game with you for the first time today! I watched you develop strike a Conquerer with your Defiance on two brothers it was awesome.
We won which was great. (I was Musashi )
Always enjoy your content brotha!
Noice GG yeah that guy deserved it he was just waiting for me
I believe you were in a div so gg to you and your div mates
The 1 & 2 that marks the citadel is saying aim here 😂
Yep
I find that the sap slaps battleships, I use a full accuracy build with the accuracy commander, with sharn and cunning as inspirations
Edit: Colorado not sharn
I'd switch to the full accuracy commander, but he doesn't have fight-fire-with-fire.
Littorio does though
The little secondary fire at the end 😂
I just had a game with my Alaska and I BLAAPED the 4 citadels on a broadside Lauria, because I knew where to aim thanks to your videos
Awesome congrats
@SpartanElite43 of course when I did he immediately responded by blapping me back lol
Have a sniper build on mine and it works well. Not perfect but it’s ok. The SAP shells i find good against bow tanking bb’s. i try to stay at medium range.
I was undecided Spartan so thank you for this review I however am curious about the Soviet tier 7
Good looking ship but it is prob gonna get dev struck more than Yama. Not only because its citadel is massive, but also because it’s yet another legendary tier ship that you can get with money (yaaaaaaaaaaay). Thus, all the potatoes are gonna play it.
That Citadel is a Hilton Inn 0_o
This meatball is crunchy.
I just got my FIRST Legendary Four Commander this morning lol.
Nice!
This must be Spartan’s attempt to actively make the ship look bad to lower the people who will buy it. Seriously, for a supposed “battleship main” to be this out of touch with battleship reviews, is crazy. To review Lauria (a ship that is meant to be a mid-long range sniper with good camo), put a full brawler/reload build on it, never use the SAP, and then call it bad is appalling.
The SAP vs the AP is pretty easy to understand. The SAP has more base damage and never overpens, but can’t citadel most things. For if what you’re shooting it you can’t/won’t citadel, use the SAP. It will always do more damage than the AP. If you can citadel, use the AP as it will do more than the SAP pen damage.
AP is an accent to help the ship, and the fact that he uses it as the main ammo (and NEVER uses the SAP, wtf) is just throwing. If you can’t aim and make the SAP work, it’s simply a skill issue. On a BB, it’s totally superior to the AP unless you can citadel.
Seriously Spartan, at least actually learn how to play the boat before reviewing it in the most ignorant way possible…
😆 🤣 😂
Did you know that SAP has to hit lightly-armored sections of the ship? Think fore and aft. It's annoying to use SAP, because you have to literally change how you're aiming, compared to AP.
The ship sounds like the the navarin Spartan lol
It’s not I have no clue why he’s running di revel and not one of the ac commanders
When you said Bredda I thought you said Beretta lmao
I am so planning to acquire that ship.
One last thought on the Lauria and this is more along the lines of advice for anybody who plans to acquire this ship.
Consider not using the Cyberpunk camo because said camo almost perfectly highlights for the shooter as to where to aim at that towering citadel.
It might as well say "Aim Here Please"
Also the gun turrets are rather brightly contrasted on a mostly dark ship...that's also earned helpful if one is aiming for the turrets so I humbly advise not going out there in that camo....use a different camo for cryin' out loud. Let's not make things easier for the Red Team. But hey, that's just me.
Sap won't be useful against those light cruisers that all I seem to do is overpen with most battleship AP?
Today i discovered, i prefer ships with alot of guns. Idk why but thats how iam lol
Have you thought of using the jingles free character
Is the battleship R. Lauria or the Soviet cruiser better?
This is the Giuseppe Verdi without radar.
More like the Polo, looks like the secondaries are the longest reloading secondaries in the game I could be wrong though
Well i took Iachino with DiRevel and AL Colorado And with SAP i shred everything for 20km. Absolutely awesome ship. SAP needs nerf it's brutal.
Really don't know why Spartan used brawling DiRevel as main captain he is good for inspiration and only with SAP strategy.
I don't feel this need more dispersion. But she'll grouping with Iachino is enough for me and also spotter helps well.
It still irritates me that the Iowa is gimped speed wise, balance Wargaming says yet there are plenty of Battleships that can do 33 knots or more in the game. It is a deliberate slight by the Devs.
Good looking ship
This things a beast, are you sure your're using it right? I'm stressing out the entire server right now. Try it with my build.
Upgrades
-Aiming Systems
-Rudder Shift
-Concealment System
-Main Battery Reload mod 3
Commander: Paolo di Ravel
-Brawler
-Artisans Touch
-On second thought
-Master Mechanic
+ Will to rebuild
Inspirations
-Andrew Cunningham
-Robert Jaujard
Ive got 86% winrate on 8 battles (I know small sample), Regularly getting 140k games, crusier can just pray when they meet you and I have a 19 SECOND RELOAD. That is terrifying with 18 inch guns.
Also the SAP is for bitchslapping anyone not flat on you.
I booted the game up. I was like what's this!
Im assuming you'll do one on the defence?
Hey Spartan and other I have just pulled a Stalingrad from the new crates. Idk if this new ships is the update is fine with me
I was in that game
Brawling commander chhhhhhh
Meet the Lauria.
Did we meet the Lauria in this video?
From a Critical Thinking perspective that answer would be no as a viewer...the sample size regarding matches played is much too small and the commander build is not in the Lauria's best interest.
Granted, Italian BB's are not Spartan's cup of tea unless it's the Columbo. There is nothing wrong with SAP shells on the Lauria's main guns...Derka's video demonstrated this quite well...what SAP (main) shells require (on Italian BB's) is slightly more precise targeting...
It's like hockey...some snipers will shoot less at the goal in search of the more perfect shot on goal...SAP mains kinda require the same discipline and such a dynamic is not for everyone for lots of reasons which can include things like patience and one's skill set.
I'm told the Lauria has a 1.9 sigma (same as the Montana) with cruiser-ish dispersion. The few that I've played with out there (and against) have demonstrated this claim to be correct but....ya need Iachino as the main commander on the Lauria, not di Revel.
Some ships are more challenging...American BB's, though most awesome, are Easy Button ships to play...the problem with them is that they do not promote 3 dimensional thinking...Metajerk is a classic example of a player who can wreck an opposing team with ships that many or most players would often dismiss (Gascogne anyone?)
I think the Lauria is better than what we see in this video. Granted this video is an opinion piece and as with most opinions...they are subjective.
Lol 1.9 sigma is fine but comparing an 8 gun bb to a 12 gun bb is a bit of a goof..
Big difference as having 50% more stuff to throw at a target goes a long way towards improving the feel of the ships accuracy..
As for SAP yes it can be useful but as stated there are very few situations where I'd rather be shooting SAP from this BB than the AP simple as that
The guns on either the Lauria or the Columbo can't be compared, which s why I avoided doing just that....
Different caliber, different characteristics, it is apples to oranges.
The commander build that you used along with your small sample size of games didn't showcase the Lauria accurately, which to me is rather surprising because you're generally more thorough than this.
SAP mains on BB's require a slightly different thought process when targeting. Derka's video review of the Lauria touched on this rather well.
It may be that your skillsets are not suited for ships of this kind and that's ok. I'm not able to get certain ships to work for me either.
We know it can't overmatch 32 with AP but what is the rule on SAP
Same situation. The sap does not overmatch 32mm
How much does it cost?
yeah I wish he would have mentioned that
I read something about it being 32,000 doubloons. 😳
@@vincehoward3853I saw 35k, either way for a ship from a nation I don't like, my hand is staying in my pocket.
Too much
Ohio was a $40 ship last year. This ship is well over $100 because shills enable WarGaming greed.
Are either of the two new commanders worth a crap
Think they're just guises aren't they?
@ what does that mean I just recently started playing on console
Is the update out now?
Yes
Pulled the Tier 7 Lenin from level 5 crate
@@fester7945 gimme
I love how even if any Italian ship you play compares well to other ships, everytime you play a new Italian ship you only play it 5-10 damn times and call it shit. Italian ships require skill, I main Italy and do very well. Playing them only 5 times before a review doesnt do them justice and is just lazy.
The ship doesn't really have anything good other than the heal.. the SAP is a gimmick that works better on the Cruisers sure it can work but the accuracy is so bad and because it only has 8 guns shows all the wonky dispersion
@@SpartanElite43yet you do not use the accuracy commander tf
Mussolini approves of this 👍
I have a question if I complete the campaign and doo all the missions i still dont have enough do buy it what else can i doo ?
Pay through the nose for the extra cyber cents.
🐋
Day 1 amalfi vid?
How can you get 17500 cybercents to get this ship?
You have to spend money unfortunately you cannot get this ship free
@ how can you buy cybercents? Am I missing something?
@tyrelblankenship you have to buy the cyber crates the currency is in them
nice
Really makes me want to play my Ohio instead
Let’s compare this to USS Ohio
The Russian cruiser is way ways better. Ik vendetta Rossa is a sexy ship but if your trying to win stay away from it and go with that Russian cruiser. In 3 battles I've already got 11 ships on my counter in standard battles.
listen iam sorry but the price is wayyyyy toooo high but iam def getting defence that ship lookes so nasty ON UPDATE day in pgs stream and he even said its so strong but its update day lol
Don't be sorry...i agree with you.
The Lauria is an excellent battleship but the out of pocket cost of roughly $120 U.S. dollars to obtain the additional campaign currency, to make up the difference, is nothing short of obscene.
I got the Defence and it's quite the monster to unleash onto the Red team, and I opted for the Tier V Dupleix, which is quite the cruiser killer, especially with those reload boosters. I've absolutely massacred Tier VI cruisers with those eight 203's.
And it's kinda fast to.
Gotta be careful though, it's bit of a glass cannon.
@@moonytheloony6516 iam sorry but why whale.... 🐋🐋🐳🐳
Hey spartan, gonna be real you sound a little down
In any case i wish you a healthy Christmas
Was just tired this morning. Update day is always a rough one
@ that’s for sure, the amount of open water rushing DD’s I’ve seen is quite damming
I’m gonna say this to you man, about the SAP
I know it seems potentially dookie, but treat It like really high pen HE
Know the nature of the shell, especially how it pens 114mm or something
Realistically it is supposed to be very powerful, and kind of a gimmick of the ship
Not that I have the ship yet, it’s dam expensive so ima wait until I’ve accumulated cybercents
still no Kremlin -_-
I play it as OHIO , just destroying people with AP 😂
Btw , if u would swap to SAP against conquerer u would kill him in 2-3 strikes
In r lauria SAI >AP in damege
Hi
Hi
Iachino is a game changer as a commander on this thing. Di Revel is terrible 😅
Not going to get this ship, that's it full stop
Good that its not the best, no need to try to get it then
Uses op ship
uses wrong commander
does bad
says ship is bad
yep average spartan review for any italian ship.
As an italian main spartan is just talking wack the ship is good he just refuses to use the correct build because it's italian if anyone plays italy you know you gotta have the build and the experience to use italy well, it isnt a bad ship and not a bad nation it's just spartan being bias as usual while ruining a perfectly good nation and their ships.
If this comment does get deleted by spatan I have picture proof that he is deleting comments that go against what he says dont listen to him he's just but hurt people are better at the game than he is and cant take any form of criticism.
Lol tell me you didn't watch the video without telling me you didn't watch the video..
I explain my reasoning for why I chose what I chose and I didn't call it a bad ship I just think the SAP is a gimmick that isn't as good on BBs as people like to say it is..
There is almost no scenario where firing SAP in this ship results in a better salvo than the AP
The ships main selling point is 18" guns and a super heal
@@SpartanElite43 then you seriously do not know how to use SAP then, SAP is good against Light and medium armoured ships not BBs, AP is best with italian improved pen. Not mentioning the non use of the italian range commander worsening accuracy by a lot making SAP functionally useless at range with AP being better with range.
Though I do agree the shell caliber is too large to use SAP effectively the shell cant be used as an AP substitute and needs mid to short range to get good hits in which Lauria cannot do as its a range BB not a brawler.
@spectre4399 that's just it though the ship has 457mm guns which overmatch most of the cruisers at L tier so why would you opt to shoot SAP at those targets instead of AP?
@spectre4399 lol why would I delete your comment?
I have no problem talking with people who have differences of opinions..
The people that get banned on my channel are people who go out of their way to incite a reaction or attack others
The maximum of.......a lot. Ohio math. Lol
Exactly premium Top Tier Scholar over here!
i cant say i like it :/
Lauria is a very strong ship at the minute and I have been enjoying it but I know that it’s gonna get power crept🥲
Good
Is now power creep, r.lauria ohio new line dd 30 seconds radars, sonars 5.6km ship concelment 4.9, new cv
Brother it ain’t getting powercrept and you should trust me on that 💀
@@thej3389 It will 100% get power crept when the buff the weaker ships at L tier. The SAP slaps any ship and the alpha on bot the AP and SAP is disgusting… if you know how to play it and flank properly this ship can easily put up 175k every match
@ooWxlchyy yep contradict yourself in the same sentence
This game it´s dead..... It´s only a matter of time, shhort time