No, you're wrong. Putin twice tried to bring peace to Donbass by offering the Minsk agreements, but Zelensky abandoned the Minsk agreements and started a war.@@TechTusiast
@@TechTusiast west ukraine is NOT Germany, why should he care---besides west ukraine population has already been absorbed elsewhere where the census data will be updated very shortly to show gains....
@@andyandy2567The Ukrainian army at the beginning of the war numbered 700 thousand people and had quite a lot of weapons. Russia started the war with 160 thousand people and then mobilized another 300 thousand. What civilians are you talking about?
Ukraine at the beginning of the war, had an army of the size like 260,000 people as the war grew on in the beginning stages Ukraine’s army blew up to 700,000 people where do you think they got those people from the civilian populous that’s what goes on when someone invades your country civilians turn into soldiers civilians turn into partisan soldiers. Now because Russia keeps fighting in somebody else’s country, Ukraine has a huge army of 2.2 million people or something like that. All those civilian soldiers fighting against an oligarch that invaded Ukraine..
@@Heterosexual51Ukraines army was under developed, disorganized and in shambles. But they had high moral of defending their homeland and that’s why they are going to win
Germany doesn't want to share its advanced weapons. French opposition parties, including European leaders are against sending combat troops to Ukraine. The US is divided on the question of aiding Ukraine (hasn't sent aid there in 5 months now).The Uk is at best ambivalent not giving any firm reassurances (the same position it had on eve of World War One). Ukraine is left standing in the battlefield to fend itself
Ukraine went to war with rented equipment and borrowed money. The only thing the Ukrainian government "owned" was the captive Ukrainian men who were the cannon fodder. The cannon fodder is running out, and with it the foreign money and equipment. Zelinsky got suckered. The people of Ukraine paid the price.
I remember when Sholz ruled out sending German Leopards 2 to Ukraine. He is dependent on his boss in Washington. Biden ruled out sending American troops to Ukraine, so Sholz was permitted to do the same regarding German troops.
@@aguypassingby1945 No. It is Biden who is Sholz's boss. No doubt about that. Read this short story: Biden called Sholz to Washington and told him: "I will destroy your gas pipe". And Sholz answered: "Yes, sir." Biden: "Blowing gas pipe will hurt your people" Sholz: "I don't care" And smiled. "Don't tell anybody it was me" -said Biden. "OK, sir. I will tell my people that it was a bunch of amateur scuba divers aboard a small yacht. " - answered Sholz "Would your people believe that BS?" -asked Biden. "I don't care" - answered Sholz and smiled.
Zelensky admitted that Ukraine had no intention to honor the Minsk agreements. Who didn't want peace? Who advised against the 2022 peace talks in April? Hint: someone visited Zelensky in Kiev at that time
НАТО в 10 раз больше и сильнее чем Россия, именно поэтому российская военная доктрина не предполагает войны с НАТО обычными вооружениями. Так что да, - это прямая дорога к концу
His point is important. Ukraine doesn't have trained personnel to maintain the arms they want-thats the truth. So, in order to provide them, Europe would need to send troops who can operate & maintain them. A "no" to one means a "no" to the other.
When you run out of Ukrainians Lindsey Graham announces the war is over and Ukraine won. And you can bet that Lindsey is keeping a tally sheet on the number of not yet dead Ukrainian soldiers
He did not say Nato should send boots now to Ukraine. What he basically said is, if push comes to shove, Nato cannot afford to rule out an option of sending troops. In short, Nato must intensify the preparation to keep Russia at bay.
@@adrieljaquez156its a politic,,its just for publication..like how eu ban rusia energy,,but till now eu still buy rus gas..because if im not mistaken 50% rusia lng buyer is europe
@@alberthenriette8976it makes Germans and west look when one leader show their hand. Think about it signaling to Putin that he won’t have worry about euro or USA troops. It’s cowardly for one western country to force the rest back track. It what Putin wants west be afraid sending boots and prove nuclear blackmail works. Germans people are the problem and Joe Biden weak response to Russian aggression and war against Ukraine
The time to send troops to Ukraine was 2 years ago, 1 year ago, today, and tomorrow. What are we afraid of, waiting for the war to come to our backyard?
It is incredible that putin absolutely is free to throw all his arsenal, short of nuclear, on the battlefield, yet the u.s and german are so carrefull about the help they give to ukraine! Non sense to me. Ukraine should have the right to use whatever they have available to kick russia out of their land! Joe and Shult just want the war to prolong perhaps. Feel really sorry for the Ukrainians.
Посмотрите речь Гитлера перед тем, как он решил уничтожить население России. Современные речи отличаются ровно ничем. Фашистская Европа снова хочет освободить Россию.
Russia successfully tested the modern RS-28 Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missile (most powerful ICBM in the world). Russia successfully tested the Avangard hypersonic glide vehicle. Russia successfully tested 9M730 Burevestnik (nuclear-powered, nuclear-armed cruise missile). Russia has Poseidon nuclear capable super torpedoes. Only Russia has this capability. World's largest submarine K-329 Belgorod, unlimited range, carrier of 2M39 Poseidon nuclear torpedoes. Russia successfully test-launched a new missile defense system A-235 PL-19 Nudol Russia successfully tested the new S-550 air defense system. Russia has powerful anti-satellite weapons (if used, nato will be blind).
Russia needs all of that because their conventional forces are vastly inferior. NATO can take out all but the most hardened Russian nuclear assets with conventional weapons. Russia has no ability to strike NATO's nuclear assets with conventional weapons and must use nuclear weapons. Russian conventional weapons can barely strike targets in Ukraine.
As a German, I am positively surprised by France, although they have to deliver a little more weapons and money to Ukraine, since Germany is clearly ahead in this case, as they have delivered significantly more weapons, money and ammunition. But for Ukraine to win, everyone should supply More weapons EU, NATO.
Germany's Chancellor doesn't have authority to rule out anything other nations decides to do. What he can do is what he has been doing the whole time, being a Putin chrony.
@@duhni4551 That doesn‘t represent the base of the contract. Germany has to be consulted with - because we would be dragged along against our will. If France wants to still have them (and even deepen them like they constantly suggest), they will have to consider our position.
@551 A NATO country cannot singlehandedly go to war with Russia, Russia will among other things target France's infrastructure. That would trigger Article 5, which means all NATO countries are at war due to France's actions.
@@MetallicReg It is about how you look at the agreement, one could say it is enough to just mention to Germany that France will send troops to Ukraine, after math of it doesn't obligate Germany to help France after all, same as NATO article 5 wouldn't be triggered as France would be the one taking the aggressive approach instead of just defending it self. It all boils down to that, so Germany really isn't in any position to say anything at all if France wants to send troops to Ukraine. There are no position that involves Germany, as you now know.
The more look at Schlz, the more reminds me a small shop keeper who happily counting his handful coins in his basement. Don't know why. Maybe he reminds me someone I knew from books.
Chancellor Scholz is the worst chancellor I can imagine when it comes to Ukraine. Everything he does seems to play into Putin's hands in one way or another. For example, deliveries of Scholz's Leopard tanks were delayed by a year. Russia used this time to build defenses and huge minefields, thereby neutralizing the tanks. The same thing is now happening with the Taurus cruise missile. When Taurus is finally delivered, Russia will have figured out the vulnerabilities (through espionage, bribery, etc.) and can successfully fend them off. The question is whether this has anything to do with the large number of Russia and Putin-friendly SPD members (Gerhard Schröder, Sigmar Gabriel, Manuela Schwesig, Rolf Mützenich, Ralf Stegner, Wolfgang Schmidt, etc.). Scholz was an ardent Marxist in the 80s and belonged to the Stamokap (State monopoly capitalism) wing of the Jusos. Scholz’s reticence towards Putin could also have something to do with his political past. Maybe the SPD doesn't know it: Putin's Russia is now a flawless fascist dictatorship. The next problem is already looming: Olaf Scholz has “legal concerns” about giving Ukraine the 300 billion euros frozen in the EU (so called Nawalny act). Remarkable point of view for someone who is involved in the biggest cheating scandal of the post-war period in Germany (Cum-Ex scandal) and whose main defense is his major lapses in memory.
DW does come up with good documentaries at times. Can we get one to remind everyone on what the fate was for each one of the invading forces against Russia ?
If the question is, would German or French technicians be stationed in Ukraine to be on hand to oversee the reprogramming of Taurus missiles or perform other tasks then this statement could be considered to be testing the waters a little bit.
An apple farmer, an airline caterer and an out-of-work graduate are among the Indian nationals hired by Moscow, with the help of recruiters around the world, to fight for the Russian army in Ukraine. Two years into the war, tens of thousands of Russian soldiers have died in Ukraine, and Moscow is on a global quest for more combatants, sometimes with the assistance - complicit or oblivious - of informal intermediaries.
Sabre rattling and then accuse Russia and china of overreacting. These two along with their friends in the Middle East and South America could join for self-protection.
Giving different signal and messages from EU leaders is the sign of despair. EU is in decline and instead of unity they are showing disunity which would mean no direction regarding security of EU.
I think you need a different word for your caption. Saying Europe "downplayed" sending troops also means they didn't make a big deal out of sending troops. Very different messages sent with the same word 😂
Read all the comments loaded till now. Most appropriate 1.why nato defending a non member. 2. Do not start a war which cannot be won. My views Humanity, Brotherhood,Democracy are the terms to justify the interest ( security, threat, Economy, POWER) Rest is all in the books for future generations to research. ❤❤❤
Russia should not be underestimated as its military has shown the ability to adapt and the country has expanded its industrial base amid the conflict with Ukraine, US Army Chief of Staff General Randy George has said. George, who is the highest-ranking military officer in the Department of the Army, shared his assessment on Tuesday during a forum hosted by the Washington-based Defense Writers Group. Russian forces “are adapting and they are learning” amid the fighting with the Ukrainian military, he said. The chief of staff highlighted Russia’s advances in drones, loitering munitions, and electronic warfare.
Does France not have Taurus or long ATACAMS range missile? If there were terrorists fighting against Russian imperialism rather than German imperialism, would they be called far left or far right?
Temporary disagreement . After few months all NATO will send troops to Ukrain and probably to Russia itself . That is how the dinamics works . The conflict is inevitable .
Not yet.Send troops when the Europe catches up with Russia or China,militarily and preparedness. Europe is just waking up and the fighting troop needs training!China and Russia have 70 years of fighting experience.
Wouldn’t go down too well with the electorate if Schlz would say otherwise.
Aaron bushnell
@@TechTusiast A real leader has to make peace not war !
@@TechTusiast Peace will come when Ukraine's President will not refuse negotiations by Presidential decree!
No, you're wrong.
Putin twice tried to bring peace to Donbass by offering the Minsk agreements, but Zelensky abandoned the Minsk agreements and started a war.@@TechTusiast
@@TechTusiast west ukraine is NOT Germany, why should he care---besides west ukraine population has already been absorbed elsewhere where the census data will be updated very shortly to show gains....
russia doesn't care about strategic ambiguity, since they always assume the worst. all that delay is doing is buying putin more time.
Anyway, Putin's actions are ahead of time. They have been so since the very beginning. Ukraine is doomed and will inevitably fall.
Exactly why in the world would they refuse keep boots as option or even redline
@@notmyself2533because we will cease to exist if they send troops 🤷🏽♀️
The globalists wanted to make a fool out of Russia. But instead, the globalists ended up making fools of themselves. Let that be a lesson
Russia is making a fool of themselves without anyone’s help
Russian is making a fool of themselves lol. They couldn't even defeat a group of civilian using outdated weapons.
@@andyandy2567The Ukrainian army at the beginning of the war numbered 700 thousand people and had quite a lot of weapons.
Russia started the war with 160 thousand people and then mobilized another 300 thousand.
What civilians are you talking about?
Ukraine at the beginning of the war, had an army of the size like 260,000 people as the war grew on in the beginning stages Ukraine’s army blew up to 700,000 people where do you think they got those people from the civilian populous that’s what goes on when someone invades your country civilians turn into soldiers civilians turn into partisan soldiers. Now because Russia keeps fighting in somebody else’s country, Ukraine has a huge army of 2.2 million people or something like that. All those civilian soldiers fighting against an oligarch that invaded Ukraine..
@@Heterosexual51Ukraines army was under developed, disorganized and in shambles. But they had high moral of defending their homeland and that’s why they are going to win
Sholtz with an Indian accent, 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Trolled by dutch welle
Are you CNN bot?
NATO needs to understand that playing Russian roulette with a nuclear superpower is never a good idea..
Russia also need to understand that and withdraw from Ukraine.
Nuclear weapons go both ways you know?
@@endlessendless2391who's gonna make 'em?
They know Russia would fight till the end to defend their sovereignty.
@endlessendless2391 Russia need to understand what? Last time we checked Ukraine isn't NATO
Its crazy how they are all crapping their pants 🤣🤣🤣
Putin must be held accountable for this horrific refuse of sending troops
Me too bro, I not wanna die in nuclear WW3
No one wants nuclear winter for wars we know nothing about, and am not talking about the spin we get from these media sources
Germany doesn't want to share its advanced weapons. French opposition parties, including European leaders are against sending combat troops to Ukraine. The US is divided on the question of aiding Ukraine (hasn't sent aid there in 5 months now).The Uk is at best ambivalent not giving any firm reassurances (the same position it had on eve of World War One). Ukraine is left standing in the battlefield to fend itself
This is a JOKE, Macron do not send even old french weapons, old french jets
It is 😂@@Dani-mw2ws
Ukraine went to war with rented equipment and borrowed money. The only thing the Ukrainian government "owned" was the captive Ukrainian men who were the cannon fodder. The cannon fodder is running out, and with it the foreign money and equipment. Zelinsky got suckered. The people of Ukraine paid the price.
Europe is solely responsible not the usa
@@tellitlikeitis5856 Europe and US working from behind both get the blame
I remember when Sholz ruled out sending German Leopards 2 to Ukraine. He is dependent on his boss in Washington. Biden ruled out sending American troops to Ukraine, so Sholz was permitted to do the same regarding German troops.
His boss not in Washington, but in Moscow. Looks like that.
USA has huge military base in Germany...Germany bow to USA @@aguypassingby1945
@@aguypassingby1945 No.
It is Biden who is Sholz's boss. No doubt about that. Read this short story:
Biden called Sholz to Washington and told him: "I will destroy your gas pipe".
And Sholz answered: "Yes, sir."
Biden: "Blowing gas pipe will hurt your people"
Sholz: "I don't care" And smiled.
"Don't tell anybody it was me" -said Biden.
"OK, sir. I will tell my people that it was a bunch of amateur scuba divers aboard a small yacht. " - answered Sholz
"Would your people believe that BS?" -asked Biden.
"I don't care" - answered Sholz and smiled.
Germany wow not to have German soldiers fighting against the Russian because of what happened in the past
Send in politicians first.
never say never
Aaron bushnell
Olaf Scholz - 21st century Neville Chaimberlain
No one wants western European troops to attack Russians
A Deliberator.
Neville Chamberlain the man saved who saved the uk
What is he so afraid of? Is it putin or the electorate. Let us see the remnants of the evil that lies dormant in certain parts of Europe.
@@NicolasHaufenot a student of British history then.
Zelensky admitted that Ukraine had no intention to honor the Minsk agreements. Who didn't want peace? Who advised against the 2022 peace talks in April?
Hint: someone visited Zelensky in Kiev at that time
It’s Kyiv you Russian bot
@@sebastiaanl9876 I think your cranium is collapsing on its empty void.
I wonder which countries in Europe will turn into glass first if they try to send troops to Ukraine 🤣🚀
2 month old account. That won't happen despite your fantasies.
@@marisabenson1222 try it, Europeans are playing Russian roulette by now, a game Russia is famous for 🤣
НАТО в 10 раз больше и сильнее чем Россия, именно поэтому российская военная доктрина не предполагает войны с НАТО обычными вооружениями. Так что да, - это прямая дорога к концу
I didn't realise Emmanuel Macron has an indian accent. 😂
Its clear 😂
They also downplayed sending fighterjets and look where we are now.
The jets aren't there yet and the ones donated are from 1980's. Flying junkyard.
We are in the moment when jets are still not there. Lay off the cope.
What bunch of kids afraid kid fighting bully giving up be toon Jj
His point is important. Ukraine doesn't have trained personnel to maintain the arms they want-thats the truth. So, in order to provide them, Europe would need to send troops who can operate & maintain them. A "no" to one means a "no" to the other.
And then they become legitimate military targets for Russia. Like that's how WW3 starts. One country isn't worth tens of millions dying.
Thank you to Prime minister Scholz to be so clear !💗
Not our problem.
Then give more support now Scholz, before you have to commit troops
Why not just acknowledge defeat and go on with life?
What happens when you run out of Ukrainians?
@josephshields2922 then other countries send troops, as occurred in 1916.
When you run out of Ukrainians Lindsey Graham announces the war is over and Ukraine won. And you can bet that Lindsey is keeping a tally sheet on the number of not yet dead Ukrainian soldiers
"we liberated Europe from fascism and they will never forgive us because of that." - marshall Zukov
Also Zukow "We would have never had defeated Germany if there were no American landlease."
"They never forgave us for mass executions and installing our satellite states."
@@univeropa3363 so Europe did in Russia
@@Loreless Which satellite states got installed in Russia?
@@univeropa3363 Lokot republic
Ukraine war was desinged to pull the second largest economic body down. Now, US left and European cintinue to fight for US to destroy Europe herself.
Seriously. How do you all think this will end if Ukraine loses?
Maybe its just not a question of if but rather when NATO will directly oppose Russia and its attempts to re-build the USSR.
Как же это звучит нелепо, по факту что сделано для восстановления СССР? Конкретно что именно.
Let Macron challenge Putin if he likes?🤠. . . But allow Ukrainians to leave who wish not to be part of that grand finale.
Troops to Ukraine ? Why not ? Russia have their alias and Indians fighting for them against Ukraine. One was killed recently.
Scholz is right, no WW3.
Macron the only leader with BALLS.
You go to Ukraine then, go get your helmet
Macron is the hardest man in Europe 🇫🇷🫡
This French leader with balls do not send old French jets, old French weapons, and talks about Troops, that is joke dude
If that were true.. he could always use unilateral action and send in the French army ..without NATO
@@jakel8627 Yes he helped Ukraine a lot, he sent only few old weapons in Ukraine and hoped Ukraine will ocupie ruSSia and China
Macron's stupidity is rising more day by day!!! 😂😂😂
He did not say Nato should send boots now to Ukraine. What he basically said is, if push comes to shove, Nato cannot afford to rule out an option of sending troops. In short, Nato must intensify the preparation to keep Russia at bay.
Good luck with that, Emmy!
@@kathrynmcmorrow7170 its survival, obviously we will endure.
Last time I checked there’s already American and troops from nato allies fighting with Ukraine , in small amount ..
@@adrieljaquez156its a politic,,its just for publication..like how eu ban rusia energy,,but till now eu still buy rus gas..because if im not mistaken 50% rusia lng buyer is europe
Is French gone mad?
no they have gone sane.
Little Napoleon Macron likes to bring his Grande Armee to Russia ... yeah we know how that ended. But some people never learn from history.
@@maejohannsebastian7142 someone seems stuck in the past
No other country is dumb enough to fight america's war. Have at it france.
At least he sent protective helmets (sarc) 😂
Just talking loudly about it in itself has a huge effect on Putin. It’s so interesting to see how he reacts. He shows more and more weakness
Putin would've challenged NATO in a proxy war in Ukraine if he was a Chicken 😂
@@alberthenriette8976it makes Germans and west look when one leader show their hand. Think about it signaling to Putin that he won’t have worry about euro or USA troops. It’s cowardly for one western country to force the rest back track. It what Putin wants west be afraid sending boots and prove nuclear blackmail works. Germans people are the problem and Joe Biden weak response to Russian aggression and war against Ukraine
Oh really, suddenly spine disappears when it’s about to get real.
The time to send troops to Ukraine was 2 years ago, 1 year ago, today, and tomorrow. What are we afraid of, waiting for the war to come to our backyard?
Yes, it should have been said in January 2022. Failed deference was not a good strategy.
You look pretty brave hiding behind that keyboard… why don’t you go to Ukraine? What are you afraid of you of ?
It is incredible that putin absolutely is free to throw all his arsenal, short of nuclear, on the battlefield, yet the u.s and german are so carrefull about the help they give to ukraine! Non sense to me. Ukraine should have the right to use whatever they have available to kick russia out of their land! Joe and Shult just want the war to prolong perhaps. Feel really sorry for the Ukrainians.
Drip feed.
Who is keeping them from using what they have?
Посмотрите речь Гитлера перед тем, как он решил уничтожить население России. Современные речи отличаются ровно ничем. Фашистская Европа снова хочет освободить Россию.
So is it the war between russia and ukraine or russia and nato?
if someone else gave them weapons, they could remove those restrictions
It's only a matter of time!
I think Macron just spew a brain fart when that came out of his mouth.
Maybe he had too much wine, and had a short Napoleon moment. 😁
Russia successfully tested the modern RS-28 Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missile (most powerful ICBM in the world).
Russia successfully tested the Avangard hypersonic glide vehicle.
Russia successfully tested 9M730 Burevestnik (nuclear-powered, nuclear-armed cruise missile).
Russia has Poseidon nuclear capable super torpedoes. Only Russia has this capability. World's largest submarine K-329 Belgorod, unlimited range, carrier of 2M39 Poseidon nuclear torpedoes.
Russia successfully test-launched a new missile defense system A-235 PL-19 Nudol
Russia successfully tested the new S-550 air defense system.
Russia has powerful anti-satellite weapons (if used, nato will be blind).
Russia needs all of that because their conventional forces are vastly inferior. NATO can take out all but the most hardened Russian nuclear assets with conventional weapons. Russia has no ability to strike NATO's nuclear assets with conventional weapons and must use nuclear weapons. Russian conventional weapons can barely strike targets in Ukraine.
As a German, I am positively surprised by France, although they have to deliver a little more weapons and money to Ukraine, since Germany is clearly ahead in this case, as they have delivered significantly more weapons, money and ammunition. But for Ukraine to win, everyone should supply More weapons EU, NATO.
Drang nach osten?
The fact everyone is talking about it means Macron's doing worked. Hope more Western politicians would find their balls.
It was foolish idea. Do people think Russia is Syria. Even Europe won’t attack North Korea
Any how they put NATO troops in Ukraine that will be world 3 you don't going like
🤡🤡🤡🤡
Macron does not even send weapons. He has just a big mouth - and that is good so!
Germany's Chancellor doesn't have authority to rule out anything other nations decides to do. What he can do is what he has been doing the whole time, being a Putin chrony.
We actually can. We have separate defensive contracts with France. And this would undermine them.
@@MetallicReg But that agreement doesn't have clause where Germany can dictate will France send troops to Ukraine though.
@@duhni4551 That doesn‘t represent the base of the contract.
Germany has to be consulted with - because we would be dragged along against our will.
If France wants to still have them (and even deepen them like they constantly suggest), they will have to consider our position.
@551 A NATO country cannot singlehandedly go to war with Russia, Russia will among other things target France's infrastructure. That would trigger Article 5, which means all NATO countries are at war due to France's actions.
@@MetallicReg It is about how you look at the agreement, one could say it is enough to just mention to Germany that France will send troops to Ukraine, after math of it doesn't obligate Germany to help France after all, same as NATO article 5 wouldn't be triggered as France would be the one taking the aggressive approach instead of just defending it self. It all boils down to that, so Germany really isn't in any position to say anything at all if France wants to send troops to Ukraine. There are no position that involves Germany, as you now know.
All NATO country leaders, report to the front lines in Ukraine. Not enough WEF darlings' skin in the game!
Never use inferior nato equipment to fight a Bear. The mighty Bear wins every time
Afghan sheep herders in flip-flops be like: 🙃
The more look at Schlz, the more reminds me a small shop keeper who happily counting his handful coins in his basement. Don't know why. Maybe he reminds me someone I knew from books.
DW who is "Aaron Bushnell"?
About time Europe steps up and helps Ukraine. Yohan is a Russian mouth piece.
Chancellor Scholz is the worst chancellor I can imagine when it comes to Ukraine. Everything he does seems to play into Putin's hands in one way or another. For example, deliveries of Scholz's Leopard tanks were delayed by a year. Russia used this time to build defenses and huge minefields, thereby neutralizing the tanks. The same thing is now happening with the Taurus cruise missile. When Taurus is finally delivered, Russia will have figured out the vulnerabilities (through espionage, bribery, etc.) and can successfully fend them off.
The question is whether this has anything to do with the large number of Russia and Putin-friendly SPD members (Gerhard Schröder, Sigmar Gabriel, Manuela Schwesig, Rolf Mützenich, Ralf Stegner, Wolfgang Schmidt, etc.). Scholz was an ardent Marxist in the 80s and belonged to the Stamokap (State monopoly capitalism) wing of the Jusos. Scholz’s reticence towards Putin could also have something to do with his political past. Maybe the SPD doesn't know it: Putin's Russia is now a flawless fascist dictatorship.
The next problem is already looming: Olaf Scholz has “legal concerns” about giving Ukraine the 300 billion euros frozen in the EU (so called Nawalny act). Remarkable point of view for someone who is involved in the biggest cheating scandal of the post-war period in Germany (Cum-Ex scandal) and whose main defense is his major lapses in memory.
SED connections no doubt. He will be out of power in 2025 fortunately.
This is crazy for this men ( woe to them).
Western troops in Ukraine will never happen
Scholz Kämpfer der Freiheit!
Scholtz is modern day Chamberlain. Germany is always on the wrong side of history
I thought we learned appeasement doesn’t work
Germany showing no leadership again, makes me sad.
The US needs to stay out of this!
Germany: You can't win a war against Russia.
Zelensky: Why?
Germany: Because we already tried and it didn't end well for us.
Nice bot
@@sebastiaanl9876 People who think that Ukraine is winning are living in denial. They seek comfort in subjective reality and ignore all the facts.
@@sebastiaanl9876 The proxy war in Ukraine is the first time nato has tried to pick on someone their own size and nato is getting humiliated.
Germany defeated Russia in WW1.
LAMO Soviet Union would have collapsed in a month without allies support.
Considering Germany is supposed to be a leader in Europe it sure is being outshined by the Baltic and Nordic States.
Economic leader not military leader
Napoleon’s army were handsome boys so Russian girls failed down with their love and France won the war. . . ❤❤❤.
DW does come up with good documentaries at times.
Can we get one to remind everyone on what the fate was for each one of the invading forces against Russia ?
This isn't the 20th century anymore. Winter won't win a war for Russia.
This comment section reveals a lot of warmongers. Many blood thirsty people in our midst. Shame on you all.
Good starting point.
Ukraine needs help to defend democracy!
Europe needs to help Ukraine to rebuild its own ammunition production!
You go first Rambo!
All previous world wars started in europe, ww3 will also starts there if it happens
yes, and for the same reasons-unfortunately.
They are a violent bunch.
To send troop to Ukrine means as commit suicide. Chancellor Olaf Scholtz has reliable logic.
If the frog going to send troop to the Ukraine, they should leave their white flag at home..🤣
Boycott France Olympic.
You don't need to come.
Booooooom...nothing is left.
Good idea not too send troops to russia.
*to
*Ukraine - not Russia.
Have they lost it or what, sending troops to Ukraine. This was needs to end, this is futile and unnecessary loss of life in Ukraine.
Ukraine should invite the Afghanis to help. They really love Russians
Они действительно нас любят. По крайней мере в сравнении с американцами
OMG no German blitzkrieg. Have they learned from events in Stalingrad?
Maccky thought himself for a moment as napoleon when he made tht statements😂… may b he wants French turn into toast
Just wait, president of France 🇫🇷 made a point.
Europe so scared of Putin.. Putin could sneeze at them and they'd stop sending ammo.
De-fund unrwa !
Scholtz., pick an allie and stay with them. Time to act like a leader
He is. A leader has to have common sense once in a while.
If the question is, would German or French technicians be stationed in Ukraine to be on hand to oversee the reprogramming of Taurus missiles or perform other tasks then this statement could be considered to be testing the waters a little bit.
Why the westerns hipokrites dont free Cyprus from Turkey?
40 years from thev1974!
Why don't you then? You are also supporting Azerbaijan against Armenia!
Slavs are the best soliders, you expect those Europeans to fight against Slavs? Dream on!
Dont mind they will soon 'upplay' it not only 'downplay'.
French vs Russian
Germany vs Russian
Now Nato vs Russian.
Nuclear power vs Nuclear power.
Cripes, Germany, you spent half a century going too far. Now we can't even get you to stand up. Can you PLEASE FIND THE MIDDLE GROUND ALREADY???
You mean 12 years.
An apple farmer, an airline caterer and an out-of-work graduate are among the Indian nationals hired by Moscow, with the help of recruiters around the world, to fight for the Russian army in Ukraine. Two years into the war, tens of thousands of Russian soldiers have died in Ukraine, and Moscow is on a global quest for more combatants, sometimes with the assistance - complicit or oblivious - of informal intermediaries.
Don't exxagerate
So I guess you don't need any more help you have it covered.
Sabre rattling and then accuse Russia and china of overreacting. These two along with their friends in the Middle East and South America could join for self-protection.
Giving different signal and messages from EU leaders is the sign of despair. EU is in decline and instead of unity they are showing disunity which would mean no direction regarding security of EU.
I think you need a different word for your caption. Saying Europe "downplayed" sending troops also means they didn't make a big deal out of sending troops. Very different messages sent with the same word 😂
Nato cowards.
Are you in Ukraine?
We don't want to a ww3 bro, makes no sense
@@MateusHenrique-ow2gs nato wants ww3, haven't you been watching nato
@@MateusHenrique-ow2gsThen why don't you surrender to Putin?
@@koushikdas1992 I'm not poppet Ukraine 🤣
@@MateusHenrique-ow2gs So who are you? Russian?
Read all the comments loaded till now.
Most appropriate
1.why nato defending a non member.
2. Do not start a war which cannot be won.
My views Humanity, Brotherhood,Democracy are the terms to justify the interest ( security, threat, Economy, POWER)
Rest is all in the books for future generations to research.
❤❤❤
This is why the US should pull out of Nato. It shows Germany is not serious. They can enjoy east Germany for all.
Even the US doesn't dare to sent it's military to Ukraine, but only to Gaza
Russia should not be underestimated as its military has shown the ability to adapt and the country has expanded its industrial base amid the conflict with Ukraine, US Army Chief of Staff General Randy George has said.
George, who is the highest-ranking military officer in the Department of the Army, shared his assessment on Tuesday during a forum hosted by the Washington-based Defense Writers Group.
Russian forces “are adapting and they are learning” amid the fighting with the Ukrainian military, he said. The chief of staff highlighted Russia’s advances in drones, loitering munitions, and electronic warfare.
Seems Napolitano has been forgotten
Does France not have Taurus or long ATACAMS range missile?
If there were terrorists fighting against Russian imperialism rather than German imperialism, would they be called far left or far right?
Why should America help Urope, when Urope doesn't want to help itself. They keep dragging their feet to do something.
Go ahead france its about time France pulls its weight
They said that so they can justify sending aid to ukraine its better to send money than troops and now they can pass those bills
Temporary disagreement . After few months all NATO will send troops to Ukrain and probably to Russia itself . That is how the dinamics works . The conflict is inevitable .
15:41 there's a Z on the tank
Not yet.Send troops when the Europe catches up with Russia or China,militarily and preparedness. Europe is just waking up and the fighting troop needs training!China and Russia have 70 years of fighting experience.
At least have the spine to send Taurus…
Get ready bois, Sarmat is waiting for u bum bum 😂
Did Macron adopt Zelensky's hobby?
Sounds reasonable, Macron just indirectly declaring he might go to war with Russia and just forcing the other memberstates to go to war too🤡