Omega Speedmaster '57 vs Breitling Chronomat B01 42mm: Luxury Watch Comparison Test
Вставка
- Опубліковано 20 жов 2024
- Contact tmosso@thewatchbox.com for pricing and availability; Either I have it, or I can get it!
Shop all Breitling watches: bit.ly/2LuDD5N
Shop all Omega watches: bit.ly/2v2XXR9
Breitling SKU: 4301644
Omega SKU: 4337226
The Breitling Chronomat B01 AB0134101C1A1 is encased in 42mm of stainless steel surrounding a blue dial on a stainless steel Rouleaux bracelet. Features of this Breitling Chronomat B01 include hours, minutes, small seconds, date and chronograph. This Breitling watch also measures 15.3mm in thickness and 50.4mm from lug-to-lug.
The Omega Speedmaster ’57 Chronograph features a 41.5mm stainless steel case surrounding a black dial on a stainless steel bracelet with folding buckle. Functions include hours, minutes, small-seconds, date, chronograph and tachymeter. The watch also measures 16.4mm in thickness and 53.9mm from lug-to-lug.
For complete details, watch the full [BRAND AND MODEL] review by Tim Mosso!
Please subscribe to our channel for the best luxury watch reviews on UA-cam: www.youtube.co...
Visit our website at www.thewatchbox.com for the latest pre-owned luxury watch arrivals and industry-leading value in previously loved luxury timepieces.
Breitling knocked it out of the park with this watch. Every time I see it my heart melts. Every watch lover has that one special watch that just speaks to you and makes you feel something and this is the one for me. Now I must save up the money
how’s the mission coming along?
The Breitling is the nuts. Fantastic looking watch
25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
Great review! finally someone commending Breitling for their great work with the Chronomat 42. Right now Breitling have a number of watches in the range outperforming other brands and its great you recognised that with this video. Right now as a package, I think the Chronomat is the best sports watch available.
25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
@@kaisoerfjord8232 what???
I cannot agree more Phil.
@@kaisoerfjord8232 who cares?
@@x201t the guy's a clown and he's wrong, the movement beats at 28800...
As much as I love Omega, that Breitling is hands down an awesome watch!
Shout out to Tim. Best watch show host on UA-cam
Easily... Even though I like some of the other guys and Jenni ... The rest of them are pretty much knuckle dragging cave men when it comes to knowledge and ability to deliver unbelievable amounts of information which is almost always accurate about all kinds of watches and watch history. Tim is the rain man of the watch world.
25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
With all respect to Omega - this Breitling wins for me hands down. Co-axial from my experience is super great, but Chronomat has something in the design that... let me say it’s the first Breitling I want to own and very much so.
I purchased a Breitling Avenger 43 last year, black dial w/calf skin strap. The blue-tinted sapphire crystal gives the dial a blue "hue" at certain angles and looks outstanding, much like the gorgeous Chronomat featured here.
My Avenger is handsome and rugged and I could not be happier with my decision to go with Breitling. And I am a huge Omega fan but, Breitling is doing outstanding work on their timepieces at the moment.
Excellent video!
The Breitling looks incredible! It is a stunning piece!
The Omega is wonderful but the Breitling hits the ball out of the park.
PROBLEM: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
I got the Breitling in red gold finish New Years Eve, I can't take it off, it's such an awesome watch and it blows this Omega away.
Nothing beats the rouleaux bracelet. So comfortable!
B01 42 hands down 👌 what a beautiful watch. It ticks all the boxes for me!
PROBLEM: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
Thers One watch that's Even Uglier than A Rolex. Guess?
I’ve got the copper dial chronomat on my wrist now, so I’ve made my choice. Never identified with the brand before, but I love this watch.
I got one in blue. I agree with you. Never a Breitling guy but this watch is amazing on wrist.
The copper w/black subs is my favorite version too.
Got the silver dial and love it as well. Blue and coppar looks awesome too!
25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
I have to admit I'm a bit of Omega fanboy but out of these two; Breitling every day of the week and twice on a Sunday. JM2C. Also hurray the versus is back.
Breitling makes some of the best looking watches, I know Omega has its own reputation (history, reliability, excelence etc), but watching these both side by side, just by looks, Breitling looks better tbh
the amount of details and various textures of the dial on the Breitling are just stunning!
Honestly dismissed the chronomat when it first came out but my god... tried one on and it is my perfect watch. It fits SO well for the dimension, and the bracelet is sensational. Chronograph, rotating bezel, date, integrated look, display back, scre down and stunning Crown and 200m wr. One day it will be my exit watch
25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
@@kaisoerfjord8232 excellent pedantry but not real world issues unless you work for the mechanical Olympic timekeeping committee which is also a work of fiction unless you have a time machine for the 1950s…
Haha, just purchased the OMEGA a week ago (on brown calfskin strap). :) Splendid watch and the thickness does not bother me at all.
Thanks Butik1! If you have a quick second, click through to our site and write a review of the watch. Our customers love to read about real world experience when shopping on our website. Here's the link:
www.thewatchbox.com/shop/Omega-Speedmaster-331-10-42-51-01-002.html
Thanks in advance!
@@the1916companywatchreviews OK TIm, I did not know you can post a review of the watch on your webpage without earlier buying one (that's how it usually works based on my experience). I will try to put some 1st hand review on your page soon.
25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
PROBLEM: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
Breitling is just the perfect all around time piece. Elegant, sporty, flashy but not status hungry. They just nailed it! Unfortunately they are so mass produced that you lose 40% of its value as soon as you walk out of the store and 50-60% after it shows evidence of wear. Omega is no different but is very unfortunate.
I like look of the Omega, full in line with my favorite Chrono of them all, the Tudor BB Chrono. Still would take the Breitling, fantastic work by Breitling.
25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
@@kaisoerfjord8232 So you can - by hand - time fractions of a second? No, you can't. There, you learned something.
Omega always listening to the fans: 17mm slim by 54mm L2L, high poished sides on bracelet for the desk jockeys they will love that and- fauxtina- knocked it out of the park!
🤣
Breitlings dial is gorgeous, but looks massive and heavy as usual. Omega 57 chrono looks more refined, beautifully balanced, and as elegant as tool watches get, the winner for me.
I picked up that exact Breitling a few weeks ago. Amazing watch. Very well balanced and not too chunky. The bracelet is so comfortable that you forget you are wearing it.
Omega more refined than Breitling??..in which movie did you see this. have you ever had a Breitling to be able to talk about him? I've had both of them, Breitling wins over everything
Problem: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
I think the Breitling is way More beautiful! Thank you for the Video 😀
PROBLEM: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
Best Breitling in years imho
25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
@@kaisoerfjord8232 What?
What do u mean with your «what» ? You can read, and think, can you not?
@@kaisoerfjord8232 Yeah just weird that you replied to me, since I don't have anything to do with what you said. Anyways you're incorrect, the 9300 movement in this Omega beats at 8 times per second, and the watch has 4 markers per second, so 2 ticks per marker. No problem there right?
You do know the hand jumps forward once for each «beat», right? So 25200 beats per hour = how many jumps of the hand per second? I think 7. Certainly it isnt 8 or 4, so the chrono hand cannot be stopped on the fraction markers between each full second. Dont tell me it doesnt matter, because then you are just being nonsensical.
Hi TIm, thanks for doing the comparison! It's been too long since the last one and this definitely is a great match up!
25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
I love the look of the new chronomat,is really amazing watch, but the aesthetics are subjective. But in terms of specs objectively the chronomat has no competition. Caliber. Wateresistance. Date. Diving bezel. Tachymeter. Power reserve. Wearability.Original design.Finishing-Quality .Position of the date.History. Everything is perfect on this watch. No competition for me on this category!!
Ps: The bracelet on the chronomat has pins and no screws in order to make it the most thin and elegant is possible .It was just a design decision and with screws it would necessarily be thicker.
25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
PROBLEM: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
Yay for versus! Even with(maybe especially with) an inconclusive conclusion.
25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
@@kaisoerfjord8232 OK, now I'll have to re-watch the segment.
this Breitling is so amazing. looks great
25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
A great comparison, although I am a little torn. My heart belongs to the Omega, both from a design and movement perspective, although I'd rather the Speedmaster Racing if I wanted an automatic Speedy. The Breitling definitely had the nicer (and cooler) bracelet though.
That said, as much as I love the bi-compax design of Omega's 9300/9900, I can't help but wonder is a "standard" tri-compax would be easier to read, as it uses a 30 minute counter instead of the Omega's 60 minute counter.
25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
@@kaisoerfjord8232 Dude, take a breath. Also, Omega's Chronograph calibres are either 28800bph (such as the 9300/9900) or 21600bph (the Speedy Pro's 1861/3861), so everything you just said about Omega chronographs not being able to count fractions of a seconds is completely false.
Handsome pair of watches, and I doubt you would go wrong with either. The Chronomat for me in this comparison.
PROBLEM: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
unbelievable that you have reviewed the two watches I am looking to decide between, but the breitling is the winner for me, as I like the bullet bracelet and prefer an automatic movement. Also I am going to be wearing it mostly to work and I like the more dressy nature of the chrome bezel than the brushed metal of the omega.
I own both brands so no bias here. This Breitling is my grail watch. Love everything about it except that the clasp could use a micro adjustment feature. I don’t care for butterfly clasps.
The Breitling all the way. But I'm prejudice I have five one a Chrono cockpit with the older bullet bracelet. I've had it 25years. The pins haven't fallen out of it yet😊
PROBLEM: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
I do like the Breitling, but the Omega is more versatile, plus has a jumping hour hand travel feature and may retain more resale value.
PROBLEM: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
@@kaisoerfjord8232 I'm talking about the travel time function
Would get Breitling without a single doubt, now would get two different bracelets . Nice Omega piece
Great comparison from a few years ago, thank you Tim. Both great, but I would take the Breitling 😎👍
Breitlings is for me the clear winner!
omega is so great and this movement propably one of nices to look on but breitling just hit 🎯💯 all the boxes with these new chronomats. My numero uno 😎👍
İ would go for breitling..
Absolutely
Breitling for me and this blue colour is gorgeous
PROBLEM: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
Your VS clips are great. Keep them.comming!
PROBLEM: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
I like the speedmaster story and the CK2915 has always been my favourite, though is unobtainable with vintage prices through the roof, second only to PN Daytonas. I bought the Speedmaster 57 which harkens back to the CK2915 without being a replica, before the 57 Trilogy came out which Id have otherwise got. Considering the spirit of what the Speedmaster 57 is meant to reinterpret I don't think dial comparisons make sense. I own it on a calf strap as I find the bracelet pushes out too much, but despite having had it for 4 years and falling in and out of love with it repeatedly, I still can't get over how unnecessarily tall it is, making it top heavy with a hockey puck feel to it. Otherwise a watch with a lot of character, direct lineage to the original Speedmaster with a robust and modern vertical clutch chrono movement.
25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
PROBLEM: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
I really do like the fakt, that Breitling puts a dive-bezel on the chronomat.
Makes it much more functional / good looking.
Kudos to Breitling!
25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
Love the Omega.....HATE the faux-tina!!! This trend has to die.
Absolutely, that faux aged lume is bullshit. I wish Omega didn’t do that, and just allow it to age naturally and gracefully with the owner.
Serious issue: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
love omega but breitling wins hands down between the 2 comparisons here. I love my speedy moonwatch, but I like that watch OG not some other variations of the original moonwatch.
PROBLEM: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
Despite the long lug to lug and its overall chunkiness, I think I’d still prefer this Omega over the Breitling. The latter just looks very conventional, while the Omega couldn’t be mistaken for anything else.
Serious issue: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
If I had to make a choice my decision would be both! Without any doubt!!
PROBLEM: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
I have to agree with Omega's monocounter. I had to pause the video and spend way too much time studying it to determine how much time had elapsed on it, and even then i wasn't 100% sure lol. It's like trying to read a 9mm watch with a broadarrow hour hand😂
PROBLEM: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
@@kaisoerfjord8232 you nor any other human is accurate enough with a button push to time anything in fractions of a second anyway... it's not a big deal dude.
Breitling is all that needs to be said .
I love the small B on the second hand of the chronomat
Omega for me, it looks the more elegant and understated of the two.
25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
@@kaisoerfjord8232 You work for Breitling, don't you?
Breitling sure wins
Iv got the breitling with the green dial. It is the most beautiful watch i own. However this omega is beautiful as well❤
Not sure if you mentioned it but I think the Breitling's 15/45 tabs can be swapped out to make it a count down or count up timer.
PROBLEM: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
Oh, but the stutter of the Breitling's chrono seconds hand. That same jittery movement is shown in Bruce Williams' review. The B01 caliber needs that improved - I have 7750s that have smoother chrono seconds sweep.
PROBLEM: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
I think the Breitling Premier is similar. The B01 movement is a monster.
Both 12 hour chronos so ignore that Breitling comment about 30mins. Both of these offerings let down by their bracelets in my opinion I guess you can get the matching rubber for the Breitling. At the end of the day which one fits your wrist better and winks at your eye. Both great pieces in their own right. Breitling need to produce a ceramic bezel at this size without having to supersize to the 44mm monster. Still, lots going on for addicted mech watch freaks.
In this case I'd have the Breitling :-) Thanks for the cool video!
Warning: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
Great Video!! Keep up your awesome work!!
PROBLEM: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
Both beautiful would love both in collection🤗. Even though the Breitling dial with that deep’ish blue and just over all looks more elegant and more versatile watch to me then omega. But cant go wrong with any of this 2 watches. Its a win win regardless which one you go for! 🚨Tudor Chrono Black bay. Significantly cheaper. Wouldent mind seeing this Omega VS Tudor Chrono🤛
25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
Thanks Tim. Love these videos
PROBLEM: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
Beautiful Omega.
This issue that I experience is that I tend to dent the bezel of the omega. I therefore would be too careful wearing it, too afraid to damage it.
Problem: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
Le mouvement 9300 de la Speedmaster est immensément plus technique et prestigieux que celui de la Breitling ! Incomparable !
PROBLEM: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
The Breitling Chronomat easily!!!
Warning: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
I have never liked the flashy look of Breitling watches. In my onion the 57 looks better, has the better movement and its simply light years cooler.
PROBLEM: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
Breitling all day
Problem: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
I’d like to see the white dial Speedmaster racing 9900 against this breitling for a few reasons: thinner Speedmaster case, more modern bracelet, better dial details.
PROBLEM: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
@@kaisoerfjord8232 so passionate about that, good for you.
The Breitling Looks so old fashioned like the boring Rolex watches with the overpolished tachymeter bezel , the Omega shows some Kind of Understatement that makes it More appealing to me.
totally agree here. Omega for me. Classy!
Problem: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
Way to go Breitling!
25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
Surprised so many find the breitling aesthetically appealing. Looks like it was designed by 5 strangers. One person did the dial, one person did the bezel, one person did the bracelet and one did the case/crown......never speaking to each other and with no oversight. Hate to say I'm disagreeing with Mr Mosso on this one.
Speedmaster 57 hands down
Warning: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
@@kaisoerfjord8232 bro, why are you replying to my simple comment from 5 months ago with your strange issues about 1/4 second markers...
BREITLING LOOKS MORE LUXURY
PROBLEM: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
Non si può paragonare Omega ad Breitling .
Due livelli diversi.
Breitling vince facilmente.
I didn't know Breitling and Omega are considered two of the Swiss luxury watch's big three
Excuse my ignorance, but who's the third?
Rolex, of course.
@@GetOuttaTheJohnBoy Ah of course. Thanks 👍🏻
Warning: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
The Breitling blows this version of the speedmaster right out of the water
Kids, this is why you don’t do drugs.
@@bdg5593 he's right.
I agree. I’m not a fan of chronos, and expected the Speedmaster to easily win. I was wrong. The Breitling is a better watch.
PROBLEM: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
Godzilla (Breitling) vs Barney the dinosaur (Speedmaster)😂
Warning: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
@@kaisoerfjord8232 what?
Great comparison!
Warning: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
Nice! Breitling to the Moon !
Warning: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
Two stunning watches
Beware: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
For me it's the Breitling
Problem: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
B01 for the win
Problem: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
I prefer the Breitling
Problem: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
breitling for me
Problem: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
Breitling is the hot lick
Problem: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
My vote goes to the Speedmaster; mostly based on aesthetics.
Problem: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
these are great brands, but since when are these 2 part of a Swiss Big 3? i always thought it was Patek, AP and Rolex......
Tim, Tim, Tim. You are everything except unbiased. Thankfully, Omega is showing up on the wrist of the latest fictional British not so secret, secret agent. Thereby giving somewhat of a fresh nod to the Omega brand. The B01 brought so many firsts to the watch world. Tim, you know in your heart and mind there is a huge difference to the higher number of ticks per hour. If one was doing the "versus" between the Breitling B01 and the Zenith El Primo you would be giving the nod to Zenith for the 36,000 versus 28,800. 28,800 is the gold standard in the watch world and the difference of a 28,800 versus 25, whatever is big in the world of sporting events and chronographs. Because we are talking chronographs we are talking Breitling and sporting events, nobody has devoted the life-blood of one's company to one such facet as Breitling has. Breitling hands down knocks the Omega in the dirt. COSC certified? How many watches in the Omega catalog are COSC certified? How many Omega's come with a certificate stating COSC certification? How many Breitling's are not COSC certified? 100 Meters versus 200 meters? Your statement of the one barrel versus two barrels is nonsense , and I believe you know this. You would do yourself a favor by picking-up the latest copy of WATCH TIME magazine. Inside this magazine is an article on the B01; hardly any varrance with the chrono running or still, hardly any varrance regardless if fully wound or three quarters unwound. The one barrel 72 hour reserve was a watch first and hearld into the watch world as a technology first as well. One should mention the well known fact to people such as yourself. That is, some of the same people, which worked on the design of the Rolex 4130, were instrumental in the development of the B01. Rolex put the word out on the street cease and dismiss court orders were to follow but this threat never develop or was scrapped. I really enjoy your pod casts. Being in the Radio business, you have what it takes. Showmanship, beautiful voice (one is born with this) and wonderful delivery. Superb knowledge of the products being showcased. I enjoy listening to you. A little work on the fingernails would be my only suggestion along with an updated view on the B01. Keep your thoughts coming.
Problem: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
16.6mm and they say seiko chronos are thick
Breitling 👏🏻👏🏻
Warning: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
Omega all the way!
Breitling
I want the Omega !
Problem: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
Breitling 👌🏼👌🏼👌🏼👌🏼👌🏼👍🏼❤
Problem: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
Breitling looks more fancy and richy
Also - take advantage of the soft secondary prices folks, once again Breitling gets the ‘W’ as the retained value falls off a cliff which falls into the insatiable hands of the horological bargain seekers.
Now all i need is 6K to get this breitling 😭 (secondary market) which i say is a steal but still i don’t have $6k to throw around 😂
In my country breitling chronomat b01 cost about 4500 usd brand new 2022
Lindos relógios
Warning: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
17 thick,yup thats a door case basher,,cant wait till it gets here
10:26 Watch-pourn
Breitling nice.
Problem: 25200 BPH, you SAY, so 7 JUMPS per Second, BUT it has 1/4 Sec Markers on the dial, we all SEE - which MEANS the Omega speedmaster CANNOT time FRACTIONS of a second, because the hand NEVER HITS the visual fractions of a second - and YOU say NOTHING about that fact: clown-talk, Boxman; and what a fraud Omega is, since the 60s. The visual markers MUST MATCH the jumps of the hand, or else it doesn’t work, so it DOESN’T, and Boxman and friends here keep you all in the dark about that fact.
Breitling.