Doctor Who's Joyless Christmas

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 лют 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 615

  • @HarboWholmes
    @HarboWholmes  Місяць тому +24

    Last video of the year! (Unless you're on Patreon...)
    www.patreon.com/harbowholmes

    • @selatidos
      @selatidos Місяць тому +2

      You are in the distant future going to speak about torchwood children of earth and miracle day!?,and in the near future the Chris chibnall era!?

    • @spinningadam
      @spinningadam Місяць тому +1

      ​@@selatidosyes enjoy a few months rest Mr Wholmes and do those two!

    • @truebradfordean1555
      @truebradfordean1555 Місяць тому +1

      Please bro don’t quit. Honestly u saying u might be done with this is actually really sad.

  • @Cabb4ge.
    @Cabb4ge. Місяць тому +261

    Seriously, give Anita the Donna Noble treatment and bring her back as 15's third companion.

    • @MonkeyboyST1
      @MonkeyboyST1 Місяць тому +15

      To be honest, I feel like she’s actually better than Ruby. Bring back Anita RTD!!!

    • @flaggerify
      @flaggerify Місяць тому

      I didn't care for her.

    • @robotx9285
      @robotx9285 19 днів тому

      ​@MonkeyboyST1 There gonna be the thin possibility that she'll be 15' version of Donna..First appearing in a special, than appearing a season later.

  • @DisturbedNeo
    @DisturbedNeo Місяць тому +178

    “Murder in the Time Hotel” is actually such a good idea. The Doctor loses the TARDIS, and has to use doors in the Time Hotel to go to the same place at slightly different times to figure out the mystery.
    Then at the end, after catching the killer, he still has to do the bootstrap paradox to save the world, maybe the star seed is an insurance policy of sorts. That way, we still get the segment with Anita, just later in the episode.

  • @snowleopardSH
    @snowleopardSH Місяць тому +499

    I want the receptionist to be the next companion, such a fun part of the episode compared to the weird hotel stuff

    • @thekueken
      @thekueken Місяць тому +27

      I liked her, too, esp with her just-roll-with-it attitude (still reacting to things, tho), but ppl would def complain that she had some romantic interest in him or stuff...
      If she did come back, personally, I would think she could be interesting and interestingly utilized with her by then additional knowledge about different eras due to her new job.

    • @tgiacin435
      @tgiacin435 Місяць тому +29

      @@thekuekenDavies needs to stop trying to give the Doctor a romantic interest, and trying to make him human in general

    • @spacepenguins8939
      @spacepenguins8939 Місяць тому +6

      I wouldn’t be shocked if that’s the plan. RTD seems to be doing a lot of similar things to his first era.
      And a character from the 2nd Xmas special becoming companion in the current doctors 3rd season is something he’s done before

    • @lucasoheyze4597
      @lucasoheyze4597 Місяць тому

      That was also "weird hotel stuff"

    • @hopebgood
      @hopebgood Місяць тому +6

      I really liked Anita. She spent a whole year with The Doctor day after normal day. That must count for something.

  • @TTRPGSarvis
    @TTRPGSarvis Місяць тому +496

    Do...people really not know what those locked hotel doors are for? They connect two rooms. Mostly for larger groups of guests that need two rooms.
    I always thought it was common knowledge.

    • @lasseehrenreich5502
      @lasseehrenreich5502 Місяць тому +63

      I didn't even know that locked hotel doors existed

    • @bltc3471
      @bltc3471 Місяць тому +18

      I always had a connecting doors on holidays I assumed it was normal but I kinda get not knowing cause u have to ask for it I believe

    • @daddywhogames6601
      @daddywhogames6601 Місяць тому

      "party room" doors is how I knew them. Turn 2 rooms into 1 if people are on a hen party/stag do
      Or families book 2 rooms so parents can have some "afternoon nap" time kids, then lock the door for 15 minutes from their side

    • @tgiacin435
      @tgiacin435 Місяць тому +13

      I think it’s mostly Moffat playing with these concepts

    • @Dark_Ronius
      @Dark_Ronius Місяць тому +4

      @@TTRPGSarvis I knew, but honestly, found it funny. Because when I was a kid I did wonder what the door was for

  • @PsyrenXY
    @PsyrenXY Місяць тому +139

    I will say your suggestion of a Time Hotel spinoff is MILES BETTER than a freaking Sea Devils spinoff!!!

    • @mari-or3510
      @mari-or3510 Місяць тому +8

      There's a spanish show with a similar concept, El Ministerio del Tiempo, the idea is that there is a ministry in Madrid that opens doors to different times in spanish history. The main characters (a knight from the 15th century, a scholar from the 19th century and a nurse from the present) have to travel in time to make sure that an enemy organisation doesn’t change the timeline. It’s really entertaining!

  • @joshryan155
    @joshryan155 Місяць тому +227

    Honestly I found it very odd that after spending a year developing a friendship with Anita, the Doctor didn't even consider asking her to join him? I mean even with after Joy encouraging him to not be alone that would have been a natural push for him to go back to Anita.

    • @Comicbroe405
      @Comicbroe405 Місяць тому +14

      Man I'd rather her have a good life & a better job at the Time Hotel.

    • @joshryan155
      @joshryan155 Місяць тому +15

      @Comicbroe405 well I'm ok with her getting a the new job but I'm just saying that it would have been a nice opportunity for the Doctor to ask her to travel with him for a bit

    • @Comicbroe405
      @Comicbroe405 Місяць тому

      @@joshryan155 Fs. Maybe they'll see the fan reception & do that.

    • @Badbufon
      @Badbufon Місяць тому +15

      you have to have a young super model without flaws as your companion, a normal human being with emotions is cringe now.

    • @joshryan155
      @joshryan155 Місяць тому +10

      @@Badbufon don't forget to add contemporary too lol 😂 I really wish DW would embrace having companions from different timelines

  • @DDuckworth
    @DDuckworth Місяць тому +75

    I think Anita not being invited onboard the TARDIS may have been a good thing. There's a pattern of one-episode characters not making it beyond the end of the episode if they receive an invite. Whereas, she's now safe and got a much better job, it would be nice if she had a cameo in the future.

    • @katiehough2499
      @katiehough2499 25 днів тому +1

      It would have been nice if maybe he'd asked her, and she had turned it down for now

  • @ThePsycoDolphin
    @ThePsycoDolphin Місяць тому +196

    "I expected nothing, and i was still let down" is modern Who in an absolute nut shell.

    • @VidelxSpopovich
      @VidelxSpopovich 26 днів тому

      I stopped watching after they broke up Rory and Amy. It’s only gotten worse every episode since. They killed my favorite show.

    • @thomasdelaney4898
      @thomasdelaney4898 21 день тому

      @@VidelxSpopovich Sorry to hear your dropped out. I thought series 8 and 9 were the absolute peak of Doctor Who. If you haven't already, I would recommend checking out the episodes: Listen, Flatline, Heaven Sent (legitimately the greatest 60 minutes of television I've ever seen), Extremis and World Enough and Time.

    • @HNCS2006
      @HNCS2006 18 днів тому

      @@VidelxSpopovich Series 10 is really good. I dropped out during series 8. but have recently discovered the joy of series 10 and the Capaldi specials. worth a watch.

  • @alex99703
    @alex99703 Місяць тому +243

    Saw a theory online (I think reddit) that Villengard created the Star of Bethlehem as a means of creating Christianity, and the religion would eventually become their no. 1 customer in a few thousand years.

    • @Soulindex
      @Soulindex Місяць тому +30

      Creating their own Anglican soldiers, Church, etc. There was the Doctor's bootstrap paradox, but the episode's premise itself is a bootstrap paradox 👀

    • @leonlaird_
      @leonlaird_ Місяць тому +26

      It's not a good theory because it completely negates the real-world reason for the existence of religion, evolving as a means to necessitate civilisation's survival through history (mediating that social cohesion and a shared set of cultural expectations through periods of scarcity of resources). It is treating war and suffering as a corruption by some evil future corporation, rather than an essential feature of the dialectic of the human condition bestowed by the realities of natural selection.
      This theory would seem to propel a religious instinct in our evolutionary tendency to make sense of the world and existence, rather than be a legitimate rational exploration of the phenomenon of religious instinct. Dips a bit too far into the escapism of fantasy with the psychic properties of the star (literally astrology) to be well-functioning sci-fi.

    • @ioannismetaxas4393
      @ioannismetaxas4393 Місяць тому +6

      That's silly considering that the Church began on pentecost, after the ressurection

    • @ddddavyy8383
      @ddddavyy8383 29 днів тому +1

      The star of Bethlehem is largely irrelevant in the story of Christ and Christianity as a whole and is only relevant to the three wise men. Everything else would still happen without it

    • @kataminedj
      @kataminedj 29 днів тому +1

      This might be the most offensive thing DW has done. Like I get it. I am not cucoo about the Anglican churvh but would Moffat have done this with ANY other faith?

  • @xiNchainsx
    @xiNchainsx Місяць тому +154

    I really do think that Anita is going to be a future companion. Don't get me wrong, I liked Ruby but for me, the connection between Anita and 15 felt less rushed than Ruby and 15m beside Ruby having a whole season to establish herself. Would make sense to me since they did something similar with Donna.

    • @MentalAU
      @MentalAU Місяць тому +26

      Its pretty insane how 20 minutes with Anita felt like a better natural connection and friendship than a whole season with Ruby.

    • @tgiacin435
      @tgiacin435 Місяць тому +12

      @@MentalAUthat’s because Davies has this annoying habit of trying to make the companion as interesting as the Doctor instead of just having them be a normal person.

    • @HuntingViolets
      @HuntingViolets Місяць тому +2

      @@tgiacin435 Really? I would have said his companions were more like normal people.

    • @RTaylor1505
      @RTaylor1505 Місяць тому +1

      This rushed relationship between The Doctor and Ruby your taking about was miles better and explain much better than any Doctor companion in Chris era of the show. Seriously people like you cannot be please anymore. For god sake.

    • @RTaylor1505
      @RTaylor1505 Місяць тому

      The Doctor and Ruby friendship was great and explained well. Give them a reason why they became friends so quickly because they are both adopted and The Doctor felt so open with her because she was the same as him. I felt I know Ruby right from day 1 than I spent 3 series with Yaz from Chris era of the show. Seriously people are hard to please nowadays

  • @jamesali9251
    @jamesali9251 Місяць тому +71

    So happy to see this. I didn't expect a return so soon given how you ended the last video.

  • @jessicaable5095
    @jessicaable5095 Місяць тому +12

    I'd like to point out that there was a point to the briefcase initially moving up the ladder. It needed someone with a key card to access all the rooms till it found the earliest one. When Joy snatched the case, she took the manager's key card so had the same access he had.

  • @vullord666
    @vullord666 Місяць тому +45

    I found the episode fun on a first watch. It certainly kept my attention. It's also just wild to me that following the 60th anniversary this is the first time it really felt like the focus of the story was the Doctor's character and more importantly who they are in their latest Incarnation. It's not like it was spectacular in that aspect either, but as someone who felt like they were missing the Doctor in 15's debut season/series, it was nice to slow down and spend time with the Doctor. Just getting to know this Doctor. That said in a lot of ways this Christmas Special felt like a Moffat first draft. It had all the usual Moffat problems on full blast. I wonder if it was because it was written at the last minute, but it's unfortunate because Doctor Who desperately needed a really solid win after season one and this just was not it 😅.
    9:20: YES! So glad you also think this is the best part. You'd think it'd be too "slow" or "plot derailing", but for me it was by far the most interesting Who content I've seen in a long while. That moment when things slow down and we're forced to confront 15 as a character (and 15 is forced to confront themself as a character). It was just lovely and really embodied what I've come to view the Christmas special as being about (more of a character focused (and often Doctor focused) story than a narrative driven one; "Twice Upon a Time" being a prime example). And God do I need more Anita in future Who episodes.

    • @johnatkinson1111
      @johnatkinson1111 Місяць тому +2

      I thick Ncuti's prior commitments hampered their ability to do very doctor focused episodes in the previous season, I'm hopeful that with Ncuti's prior commitments finished we'll get more focused episodes this upcoming season. It feels like the whole production process has been slightly chaotic, perhaps if they held off another year before the doing Ncuti's debut season then it could have been better, both with cast commitments but also getting the whole production pipeline standardized as it got completely redone with Bad Wolf productions taking over after Chibnall's departure, maybe its pressures from the Disney contract stating when seasons have to be released or maybe its internal pressures from Bad Wolf and the BBC or even just over confidence but I think an extra year of production could have helped.

  • @TPH250290
    @TPH250290 Місяць тому +43

    The Time Hotel is a cool concept and as always these days it was utilised quite badly.

    • @TPH250290
      @TPH250290 Місяць тому +9

      Also it's weird and kinda sad that we saw more companion-relationship-development with Anita than we did with Ruby or any of the Chibnall companions.

    • @peacemaster8117
      @peacemaster8117 28 днів тому

      This description applies to almost every Moffat story.

  • @Guerreropowerr
    @Guerreropowerr Місяць тому +23

    If nothing else, Ncuti feels like he's found his footing as the Doctor

  • @megarotom1590
    @megarotom1590 Місяць тому +28

    I had very mixed feelings about this special. Better than most stuff we’ve gotten since Chibnail’s era started… but not as great as most the stuff we’ve gotten before then

  • @Tyranniod
    @Tyranniod Місяць тому +52

    The episode started off really good. Funny, intriguing and heart warming. Then it nose dived off a cliff in the last twenty minutes.

    • @elitusyeetus2032
      @elitusyeetus2032 Місяць тому +6

      i feel like the conclusion makes sense at least, it was one big old capitalistic bootstrap, they made the star to inspire those who were go on to be what caused the creation of the church who would go on to become their biggest customer

  • @chrisphammond
    @chrisphammond Місяць тому +35

    I am sure there is an earlier draft of the script in which Joy and Anita are the same character. Anita feels so much better realised and Joy feels like a spare part. If you take away the real world context of Covid/Parties then Joy has nothing to endear her to audiences at all. Anita’s ending is hardly a happy one either she still works in a hotel. And I’m surprised the Doctor was happy for the Hotel to continue. It just feels like the two characters should have been one. And then Joy/Anita would have meant more to us and the Doctor.

    • @Dark_Ronius
      @Dark_Ronius Місяць тому +3

      Honestly, I was hoping it would be a bit more that it turns out right at the end the receptionist was actually the first owner of the Time Hotel, back when it was a regular hotel, or something like that.

    • @aznicknac
      @aznicknac Місяць тому +6

      apparently anita was supposed to be a super small role but then they saw how much chemistry they had and decided to write her a bigger part. imagine how much worse the ep would have been with less anita!!

    • @chrisphammond
      @chrisphammond Місяць тому +2

      @@aznicknacwell if true that proves my point, that the story hadnt been fully worked out. Anita is the heart of the episode and the learning point for the doctor. Anita and the Doctor both grow. Joy on the other hand doesnt really change - besides becoming a star - her arc and presence as a whole feels very incomplete.

  • @NKJonSnow
    @NKJonSnow Місяць тому +28

    Great to see this still going. Hope you stay I love this series.

  • @dcworld4349
    @dcworld4349 Місяць тому +10

    I ended up getting really invested in the relationship he had with Anita to the point where I wished Moffat took over the next series and had her be the companion instead.
    That being said I don't know if she fell for him. It entered my mind as a possibility of Moffat once again writing about doomed love. But she didn't do the "do you have a girlfriend or boyfriend?" She went straight to boyfriend, which leads me to believe that she knew he was gay. That of course doesn't automatically mean she couldn't fall for him, people fall in love with people they can't have for all sorts of reasons all the time. The vibe she gave me was more this is a woman who has been alone for quite some time, and was grateful to have found herself getting to experience this sort of friendship again. Being old and mature enough to not get angry or feel betrayed once their time was over.

  • @nairrdlairrd
    @nairrdlairrd Місяць тому +31

    It’s wild that not only are Ncuti and Nicola real life friends, but also Anita’s character originally only had 10 lines in the script until they liked her so much they had to expand her part.
    I hadn’t realized until you commented on it, but the Doctor and Joy really did have no chemistry whatsoever. He’s just so chipper, and she’s just so sad. The Doctor had chemistry with Ruby because they had the same chipper energy. I do think it could be a good dynamic to have the excited, chipper Doctor with a tired, serious companion, but excited and chipper mixed with deeply depressed just don’t complement each other in any way.

    • @kataminedj
      @kataminedj 29 днів тому

      I don’t agree because Donna was chipper in her first episode and the Doctor was the most depressed he had ever been

  • @stevenpatrick7619
    @stevenpatrick7619 Місяць тому +132

    What a joyful title

    • @crunchysalmons
      @crunchysalmons Місяць тому +11

      this dude must’ve spent christmas alone. got no wonder left in his soul

    • @donteherriott5509
      @donteherriott5509 Місяць тому

      Oswin-I see what you did there.

    • @mareiramv
      @mareiramv Місяць тому +7

      @@crunchysalmons The Doctor: Never be cruel. Never be coward. And if you are, try to compensate.
      Doctor Who fans when someone has a different opinion then them: this dude must’ve spent christmas alone. got no wonder left in his soul
      Not sure if that's the type of fan the show tries to captivate.

    • @Comicbroe405
      @Comicbroe405 Місяць тому +3

      ​@@mareiramvMost DW fans in general seem to learn nothing from the Doctor's attitudes.

    • @cameronmcgregor2583
      @cameronmcgregor2583 Місяць тому

      Just ain't a good episode unfortunately ​@@crunchysalmons

  • @lasseehrenreich5502
    @lasseehrenreich5502 Місяць тому +81

    We thought Moffat couldn't get even more insane but he proved us wrong again and I wouldn't have it any other way - sure the logic behind the Time Hotel makes no sense if you think about it for more than a minute but I really don't care All the supporting cast was very well characterized and really felt for them when they died. I wasn't there for my dad when he died but it was after Covid so I had the chance but I was just too afraid, so I really sympathizes with Joy - something I thought about the 15th saying she will burn and she will die but Joy saying she is just changing can be seen as a commentary about different Doctor's views on regeneration. I'm so exited for more Doctor Who and wish you all happy holidays

    • @vullord666
      @vullord666 Місяць тому +4

      Oh, I didn't even clock the regeneration connection. Makes the timing really good as the channel just reviewed "Twice Upon a Time".

    • @lasseehrenreich5502
      @lasseehrenreich5502 Місяць тому +1

      @@vullord666 I didn't think about it myself either I saw some others write about it

    • @misterlau5246
      @misterlau5246 Місяць тому +2

      It's just we knew she was going to die and everything was too quick to really get involved. When characters serve the narrative and then they leave....
      Anita was the one who I liked most and I hope to see her as a companion. Great acting! I connected with her character in so little time!

    • @Starsteam1
      @Starsteam1 Місяць тому +2

      It's not a good thing to make a story as more nonsensical as possible just because you don't care about it..

    • @danieljhop1772
      @danieljhop1772 Місяць тому +2

      @@vullord666 I did I thought that’s what it meant

  • @brianfretwell3886
    @brianfretwell3886 Місяць тому +2

    I thought Mofffat took the idea for the hotel from Craig Hinton's "Missing Adventures" book, the Crystal Bucephalus, which had a restuarant that could project customers back in time to any other restaurant at any time. At least now the Time Lords have been excised from the show this Doctor didn't have to shut it down!

  • @elitusyeetus2032
    @elitusyeetus2032 Місяць тому +32

    i havent watched the video so i dont know if you come to this conclusion but i saw someone say that the plan the whole time was what happened in the end, to create the star and inspire the group that would eventually become the biggest customer of vilengard, aka the church

    • @IreneWY
      @IreneWY Місяць тому +1

      That's a great fan theory 😅

    • @elitusyeetus2032
      @elitusyeetus2032 Місяць тому +1

      @ it makes sense, and I mean I doubt these points will ever come up again so all we can do is theorize

    • @truebradfordean1555
      @truebradfordean1555 Місяць тому +1

      @@elitusyeetus2032Nar this is perfect dude. U made canon for me at least

  • @robbys5236
    @robbys5236 Місяць тому +9

    So glad to see that at least you're continuing to review the Series 14+ Doctor Who. Can't wait for your Series 15 reviews if you do those.

  • @jeremythomaswebb1485
    @jeremythomaswebb1485 Місяць тому +8

    Oh My God! The Time Hotel is a perfect setting where you can do a Doctor Who Spin Off!! 😮That's a solid point Harbo! Plenty of story opportunities to have fun with that idea.

    • @saucermcfly
      @saucermcfly Місяць тому +1

      Or at least it really should show up again in an episode.

  • @gazzadona
    @gazzadona Місяць тому +54

    I can’t lie I loved this episode and thought it was one of the strongest one in years and I cried at the ending of joy and her mum

    • @LiamYorick
      @LiamYorick Місяць тому +9

      Agreed, I was surprised since I didn't like the season but this special was pretty good

  • @Comicbroe405
    @Comicbroe405 Місяць тому +69

    I thought the episode was alright but I really enjoyed Ncuti's performance as the Doctor in this one. He seems to have settled really well into the role.

    • @johnatkinson1111
      @johnatkinson1111 Місяць тому +7

      I feel like Ncuti's other commitments during the production of the previous season hampered him really getting into the role of the doctor. I think if we had a break year to let both Ncuti finish other commitments but also let the production team and writing team fully get back into the grove of everything then the previous season would have been a bit more fleshed out, they can still have their specials, they could even double dip and do both a Christmas and new years special but just giving more time for the crew. Perhaps it was the fact that the last full series was back in 2021 so they couldn't push a full series off another year or Disney requiring a full season but it definitely felt like just the amount of time they had ended up being a problem.

    • @Starsteam1
      @Starsteam1 Місяць тому +4

      It dosen't fit the role as the Doctor.

    • @Comicbroe405
      @Comicbroe405 Місяць тому +1

      ​@Starsteam1 How does he not fit?

    • @Starsteam1
      @Starsteam1 Місяць тому +1

      @@Comicbroe405 Dosen't act like the Doctor

    • @Comicbroe405
      @Comicbroe405 Місяць тому +1

      @Starsteam1 He's a bit different but has the major characteristics there.

  • @ysthafellgynghori8423
    @ysthafellgynghori8423 Місяць тому +7

    The best Doctor Who this Christmas was 'The War Games In Colour'. It trampled all over the Moffat fiasco.

  • @Synthpopper
    @Synthpopper Місяць тому +4

    You had me worried at the beginning and end of your series 10 reviews. But here we are, and I'm joyful about it.

  • @kittyneko5521
    @kittyneko5521 Місяць тому +46

    The writeing for the most part in this episode felt like he who shall not be named writeing and it was just abit of a slog
    BUT
    I will say when the docter had to spend a year being "normal"at the hotel that whole part i did really enjoy and really make me want a whole season again of the docter being stuck on earth and trying to figure out why the tardis left him

    • @Dark_Ronius
      @Dark_Ronius Місяць тому +2

      That's the part that made this episode really good for me. It feels like Who for a while has missed those human moments. It feels like that could have been a Christmas episode on its own honestly... That he set the TARDIS to go forward in time a year for whatever reason, maybe even something as simple as wanting to surprise Ruby with a visit for Christmas 2025? Could have even finished it with "To be continued... Next Christmas"

    • @RyanJSmith
      @RyanJSmith Місяць тому +1

      I know you mean Chibs but I can't help but think what Voldemort's DW would look like. It can't be worse than what we have now even if it's 95% anti-muggle propaganda

  • @VolrinSeth
    @VolrinSeth Місяць тому +1

    You missed the closed example of an earlier episode: the Tardis materializing inside itself with Amy, Rory and 11. Where the Doctor tells himself it's the 'wibbly lever' they need to pull to get out of the mess.

  • @ThePonderer
    @ThePonderer Місяць тому +4

    I thought this one was ok.
    There was the potential for something really great in there, but I think it sacrificed having an effective ending for the sake of having a unique structure.
    It’s definitely a unique writing choice to basically stop the plot of an episode cold and have a heartwarming little short film in place of a second act, but what that ends up meaning is there’s barely any time to actually get invested in Joy.
    There’s a lot of Tell, Don’t Show with her character, and relying on Coughlan’s charisma to get us invested in her when she’s just not written strongly enough for me to care too much about the resolution with her.
    That, and I’m sick of Christmas Specials retreading the same “Oh I’m sad cause a companion left and need to learn to open myself up again” ground for the Doctor. This is like the 4th time we’ve done that exact arc.

  • @samueleveleigh2767
    @samueleveleigh2767 Місяць тому +3

    I am genuinly hoping for Anita to become a full companion and i think having her take a job at the time hotel can be an amazing segway for her to join the doctor.
    perhaps she runs into him next year and while she is loving her new life in the future/time hotel she has now had a taste of the timey whimy shenanigans that the doctor can offer, afterall working at the hotel would let her see alot of history but she would not be able to fully explore all of these new places like she could with the doctor. like how working in a bakery lets you see all of these amazingly tasty foods, but you cant eat any of them.

  • @thekueken
    @thekueken Місяць тому +42

    ...he cried. Three. Times.
    Gotta be a new record?
    The plunger-bit was hilarious, tho ;)

    • @Comicbroe405
      @Comicbroe405 Місяць тому +11

      The bits in which he did were fine so I don't think it's that big a deal this time.

    • @tgiacin435
      @tgiacin435 Місяць тому +7

      Can we stop the whole Doctor crying thing? He’s too old for that. I mean even 10 would tell him to grow a pair, and that guy was whining about Rose for most of his short time

    • @Comicbroe405
      @Comicbroe405 Місяць тому +3

      @@tgiacin435 That would just be really hypocritical of 10 lol.

    • @tgiacin435
      @tgiacin435 Місяць тому +2

      @@Comicbroe405 true, this was the guy that gave people fates worse than death cause he couldn’t let someone die.

    • @Comicbroe405
      @Comicbroe405 Місяць тому

      ​@@tgiacin435 Yeah true. Also I think they both have quite a lot of similarities.

  • @gordonhay6093
    @gordonhay6093 Місяць тому +3

    It was like SM had dusted off an unused 10th Doctor story, it just had that feel to it, like it had been written for David.

  • @alloftheabove202
    @alloftheabove202 Місяць тому +4

    I think that I would like this episode so much better if the Joy storyline was cut, and the plot was just the bit of The Doctor going "the long way round" to defeat the evil suitcase thing and save the staff at the time hotel.

  • @RenoReborn
    @RenoReborn Місяць тому +1

    My favorite part is where the Star Ship Titanic almost blew up the earth and Kylie Minogue turned into star dust..... wait, what year is this?

  • @RosesTeaAndASD
    @RosesTeaAndASD Місяць тому +1

    Other missed Dr Who companion Ops:
    - Badass Martha & her husband Mickey.
    - Victorian Clara
    - Madam Vastra, Jenny and Strax.
    Wilf will just always be missed🫶 R.I.P

  • @jeremiahlougheed1189
    @jeremiahlougheed1189 Місяць тому +3

    As a christian the star of Bethlehem at the end kinda annoys me but at this point it's just par the course

    • @HuntingViolets
      @HuntingViolets Місяць тому +4

      I don't think this show should be taking a stand on religions one way or the other, so, yes.

    • @jeremiahlougheed1189
      @jeremiahlougheed1189 Місяць тому +1

      @@HuntingViolets it sucks but I don't think it's gonna go away anytime soon. Moffat makes it very clear what he thinks of faith.

  • @Mark-lx6xj
    @Mark-lx6xj Місяць тому +1

    The Sandringham hotel is an actual family run hotel in the centre of Cardiff.

  • @Sonicsounds2121
    @Sonicsounds2121 Місяць тому +9

    I agree with your points, I feel like I’m the only other person who doesn’t like this ep lol, non of the emotion landed for me personally. Because I felt like I had no reason to care about the characters

  • @Ardvards
    @Ardvards 23 дні тому

    the doctor living with Anita for a year was genuinely really sweet. she should have been the focus. the doctor just gets stuck there for a year and genuinely becomes her friend and thats the entire episode

  • @apanapandottir205
    @apanapandottir205 Місяць тому +15

    I never have big expectations when it comes to the christmas specials but in this one Anita really got to me.
    Both the character and the performance was amazing IMO. It was both beautiful and kinda sad.

  • @stephenreed2093
    @stephenreed2093 25 днів тому +1

    This was such a mean spirited episode. It has tourists visiting wars and assassinations, and ends with a murder-suicide, but tries to make it seem all quirky and saccharine.

  • @thysens
    @thysens Місяць тому +5

    Honestly, I think Moffat keeps reusing Villengard as the underlying villain because each time he's written these stories, he's thought they would be his final penned episode for the show and wants to have that connection back to his first episode.

  • @bsabruzzo
    @bsabruzzo 25 днів тому +1

    I work in a hotel and I've never found a door that was mysterious or didn't have any purpose. In fact I've actually installed extra doors to create purposes for certain crevices and spaces that were just their randomly that now are closets and supply areas. So I have no idea what this premise is.

    • @GarrellWoods
      @GarrellWoods 20 днів тому

      “I’ve worked in hotels and I’ve never seen a purposeless door” you’ve also never seen a time traveling space alien either…it’s sci-fi, what’s your point?

    • @bsabruzzo
      @bsabruzzo 20 днів тому

      @GarrellWoods You used quotation Mark's around a statement I did not make. That means you claimed I said something when I did not. That is either a lie or a strawman.
      Next time, if you wish to snark at least get it right.
      I said "I work in a hotel and I've never found a door that was mysterious or didn't have any purpose."
      I followed up with saying I installed extra doors to create purpose for certain crevices and spaces.
      You should have come off with the response that implied I was installing the doors. You have no evidence I am not a time traveler, just that I'm adding doors and denying that they are anything but new closets where there weren't any before.

    • @GarrellWoods
      @GarrellWoods 14 днів тому

      @@bsabruzzo I can read what you said but clearly I need to expose you to the apparent mysteries of paraphrasing 😂😂😂

    • @bsabruzzo
      @bsabruzzo 13 днів тому

      @GarrellWoods when one paraphrases, one is saying you are not actually quoting another person. We get that . But if you're paraphrasing me and I am being precise in my language, that means you are rewriting what I'm saying to mean something else. In fallacy that would be straw man. You would say I'm saying something other than what I am saying.
      Again.... my point is I was saying I'm creating the doors, and I'm the one hiding the mysterious time travel activity. It's called a subtle joke. However if you wanted to be something else, that's you not me.

    • @GarrellWoods
      @GarrellWoods 13 днів тому

      @ Sweetie these are UA-cam comments and your not my professor. You know damn well, despite me paraphrasing that your statement boiled down to you saying you’ve never seen a door without a purpose in a hotel and my point is this is all sci-fi and Doctor Who has never in its history tried to “make sense” in the strictest definition. So you can whine about exact quotes all you want my point still stands.

  • @domsquared9878
    @domsquared9878 Місяць тому +10

    0:18 no, Christmas wouldn’t be Christmas without Mrs. Baddeley’s plum pudding

    • @Mazz3D
      @Mazz3D Місяць тому +2

      Underrated comment. Chimes of midnight is amazing.

    • @domsquared9878
      @domsquared9878 Місяць тому +2

      @ haha I only thought of it because I was relistening to it to fall asleep the other night, couldn’t pass up the opportunity,
      The reference was too perfect

    • @A6by
      @A6by Місяць тому +1

      It just wouldn't be Christmas u.u

    • @dallascoil5770
      @dallascoil5770 Місяць тому +1

      Scullery maid > joy

  • @Richie-Scarface
    @Richie-Scarface Місяць тому +5

    I know this episode isn’t amazing but I think it is better than the last few Christmas/new year specials we have had in the last few years

    • @flaggerify
      @flaggerify Місяць тому

      Last years was better.

  • @Dark_Ronius
    @Dark_Ronius Місяць тому +4

    I will give you one thing though. It made me chuckle when you said "Clara Oswold" was a well written character and it was the historical one, the one that was in one episode and was really well written 🤣🤣

    • @HuntingViolets
      @HuntingViolets Місяць тому

      I loved Victorian Clara. What a companion she would have been.

  • @emperordalek102
    @emperordalek102 Місяць тому +21

    please dont leave doctor who i hope season 3 doesnt get cancelled

    • @lucasoheyze4597
      @lucasoheyze4597 Місяць тому +12

      It can't be cancelled, because it's not even been commissioned yet.

    • @blueknight0604
      @blueknight0604 Місяць тому

      it'll be worse than cancellation, it'll be in that endless limbo of not being renewed.

  • @Domihork
    @Domihork Місяць тому +2

    Agreed with everything you say. Plus I'd add:
    1) The directing of this episode (and actually a lot of the episodes) feels like a stage play. I'm very aware I'm watching actors playing characters. Ncuti even often play a scene brilliantly and then he somehow does this thing where it seems like he finished acting before the scene was completely over. Or where he acts as if he knows how the script continues even though he's not supposed to know yet (for example when Trev says "4 and a half millenia" and the Doctor asks "Do you want to run those numbers again?" it's as if he knew it was wrong, but then when Trev corrects himself, the Doctor is surprised)
    2) Despite the year-long montage being the best part of the episode, it felt very out of place. If really felt like it was a completely different episode. Plus, what are the chances that in a hotel featuring all the best bits of history, there are two doors leading to the same uninteresting hotel just one year apart?
    3) Vilengard being featured again makes it seem like it's building up to something. But it's not, so it feels empty. It's just Moffat writing yet another "last" episode where he revisits his past ideas.
    4) Are we sure that making the Betlehem star a creation of the largest weapons manufacturer in the known history is as wholesome as the episode is trying to present it as? AND the idea that "a religion" (heavily implied Christianity) was started by the suitcase's psychic field? Damn, that's bold :D
    5) We had four good-byes with characters we barely knew, treated as if it was some big thing.
    Bonus) RTD said that the reason why the TARDIS crashes into the walls of the time vortex in the titles is because of Sutekh. Sutekh is now gone, so... why are the titles the same?

    • @killianobrien2007
      @killianobrien2007 Місяць тому

      Miffat couldnt alter dr who canon so he changed the bible instead lol

  • @TheInternetHelpdeskPlays
    @TheInternetHelpdeskPlays Місяць тому +27

    Dr who has got to the point ill watch 6 gours of reviews arguing about rather than the episode itself because the reviews are far more entertaining

  • @reeceemms1643
    @reeceemms1643 Місяць тому +9

    I wouldn't really call this episode Joyless. I liked it.

  • @DacornDan
    @DacornDan Місяць тому +3

    Happy holidays Harbo, thanks for all the effort you put into every review. Also, love the christmas outfit lol

  • @questionmarks4431
    @questionmarks4431 22 дні тому

    My main canon is that Joy is transformed into a soul-eating "sun god" similar to the one in The Rings of Akhaten who will oppress some random alien species for millennia, and eventually we'll get an episode about Dr realising he's messed up big time here.

  • @MrApplelovin
    @MrApplelovin Місяць тому +2

    Nicola Coughlan is a good actress, but I think the fact her character wasn't there for half the ep and had some weird character quirks and dialogue which really impacted on the potential chemistry

  • @aeloswindrunner
    @aeloswindrunner Місяць тому +2

    Honestly when they started building up the relationship with Anita I had an overwhelming urge to notify her next of kin. Kinda glad she didn't snuff her out. I thought the episode was fine, felt like a mid tier regular episode of Doctor Who rather than a festive special

  • @rhyswallace3590
    @rhyswallace3590 Місяць тому +12

    I loved the episode. I liked the emotional vibes it was going for. I think the episode was more about character than story...About how everyone is special deep down & everyone needs somebody to be there for them to give them joy..No pun intended... Even the Doctor. I also think this is the episode were the layers of this incarnation of the Doctors character are clearest... He's more human than he's ever been , more overtly empathetic, but still laser focused, observant, and cunning, Able to go to the dark places but still Being amazed at humans. Moffat just gets the Doctor and Ncuti did an amazing job.

  • @Kansas462
    @Kansas462 Місяць тому +8

    How come no one mentions the literal Hobbit door?

    • @MunkiZee
      @MunkiZee Місяць тому +3

      I'll be honest, it went right over my head, Doctor Who and LOTR are quite separate in my head, but my sister did point it out

    • @Edditaur
      @Edditaur Місяць тому +3

      New Zealand, obviously

  • @nocturne8333
    @nocturne8333 Місяць тому +1

    The Star Seed broke free of Villengard because it absorbed the consciousnesses of everyone the briefcase had killed. It basically because sentient and decided to send itself far from Earth to keep it safe.

  • @TheMadManInABox97
    @TheMadManInABox97 Місяць тому

    The bit where you said at least they didn’t have the Inn as part of the hotel, I now would love even as a throwaway line if it turned out the Doctor was the one who got the last room so Jesus had to be born in the stable instead 😅

  • @DigiRangerScott
    @DigiRangerScott Місяць тому +4

    I couldn’t believe it. Pumpkin latte didn’t have cheese

  • @Trinidad413
    @Trinidad413 Місяць тому +5

    You're so right with everything. I couldn't care less about Joy. And I don't think it was the actress, I saw her in Derry Girls and loved her character, I think it was the writing.
    Anita had ideed better chemistry with the Doctor. I want her as a companion. I hope she returns.

  • @samwong861
    @samwong861 Місяць тому +1

    I feel like if the episode stuck with the anita's plot throughout, it could be one of the best episodes in the current era

  • @GGsJane
    @GGsJane Місяць тому +13

    honestly its been a long time i haven't cried in front of a doctor who episode but that one really surprised me, i was bawling my eyes out at the end
    it really felt new, we only ever really see the doctor's regrets but rarely the others
    it really felt like all characters had an actual life and didn't just pop in existence because the doctor is here
    the deaths in this episode really had weight to them, the silurian had a story, just like any of us have and it feels so unfair for him and all the others to have it end because of villengard
    even trev who doesn't have big uptime! when he's introduced "oh shit he's so cute and polite and he doesn't want to disappoint!!!", then he falls in a trap and what is legit more terrifying than dying without anyone else knowing, they don't even let their bodies behind for them to find later no they disintegrate, right after promising something to someone too
    and anita ohhhhhhh anita i better see you again in the show
    (finally i could totally see myself speak to a fly ironically if i were all alone on christmas eve too, its not that weird tbh)
    for me it was a really good, poignant episode, the characters just felt real, relatable

    • @Hutty_
      @Hutty_ Місяць тому

      pretty weird

  • @dylanmcwilliam
    @dylanmcwilliam Місяць тому +3

    "Because Christmas killed my grandma!"

  • @arjayking6024
    @arjayking6024 Місяць тому +7

    Joy didn't die. She (and everyone else who carried the briefcase) left Earth in order to save it. Villengard may have started the process of creating a star but, again, Joy states that "they" are beyond Villengard now. Joy also said that they'll see the doctor again. It was weird that Joy took a backseat until the end of the show. I do like Anita, but more focus should have been put on Joy. We really didn't need to see the Doctor spend a year waiting around.

  • @rizzle8426
    @rizzle8426 Місяць тому +4

    Also isn't the ending basically exactly what happened to Kylie minogue's character ?

  • @Ryysight
    @Ryysight Місяць тому +1

    The real companion in this episode was Anita, the whole fandom agrees, we love her, the fandom took a shine to her quicker than we have ever taken a shine to any other companion ever... We don't often demand things but I speak for us all when I say we demand Anita as the next companion, we've never loved anybody so quickly

  • @apanapandottir205
    @apanapandottir205 Місяць тому +1

    Moffat can be so brilliant when he is creating characters like Anita, Sally Sparrow, Nancy and so on. When he lets the story land and take time with actual people.

  • @Snakepit_Media
    @Snakepit_Media Місяць тому +3

    It's so interesting to me but also really validating that a lot of people had similar issues with this special, that I did.

  • @Tulf42
    @Tulf42 Місяць тому +1

    The trouble with this episode, as Harbo pointed out, is that there wasn't as much hype after the reputation Season One/Series 14 left on the show earlier this year.
    And much like in 2008, the real focus of Christmas entertainment on BBC One has been dominated by Wallace & Gromit, along with Gavin and Stacey, so Doctor Who felt brushed aside in terms of general interest. Not to mention Sonic the Hedgehog 3 in the cinemas has been doing great over the holiday season.
    But I absolutely agree that the year the Doctor spent with Anita was so much more entertaining than the actual episode plot itself.

  • @Monkofmagnesia
    @Monkofmagnesia Місяць тому +5

    For a show about time travel, they should get history right. According to the Gosspel of Matthew, Jewsus was born during the reign of Herod the Great. Herod died in 4 BC. BC. Five years before 1 AD.

    • @killianobrien2007
      @killianobrien2007 Місяць тому

      It just says in the days of Herod the king, could have been Antipas

  • @mathieuleader8601
    @mathieuleader8601 Місяць тому +4

    I prefer Anita more than Ruby Sunday in her entire run as companion

  • @ThatLegoGuy-10140
    @ThatLegoGuy-10140 Місяць тому +3

    It was a fine special,nowhere near his best but not his worst by a landslide

  • @matroska_5625
    @matroska_5625 Місяць тому +1

    Why didn't The Doctor go to Tennant and ask to be taken back to the time hotel in the TARDIS instead of waiting a year? And why don't the bad guys just use one of the millions of existing stars for a power source instead of making their own one?

  • @shakes1026
    @shakes1026 Місяць тому +5

    I honestly feel Anita is the best companion of the last 4 series of Doctor Who. Which is sad. They just tried so hard with Ruby but she felt so boring to me. No interesting personality traits. Whereas Anita shined because she felt more natural and grown up. This is oddly specific but I knew I wasnt going to like Ruby based on her reaction to the Goblin things when she tries to be all sassy about one of them hissing at her, a nirmal person would not react that way, theyd be too spooked and freaked out. Her lines felt so try-hard and just unnatural for someone whos just met an alien for the first time and that continued with a lot of the dialogue she was given. Just shoving wierd unnatural dialogue in our faces to try and make us like this character. Sometimes less is more with a companion.

    • @mayotango1317
      @mayotango1317 Місяць тому

      I think Ruby Sunday is the best Gen-Z companion.
      People today is not scared, they take selfies.

  • @FinalSeraphLeo
    @FinalSeraphLeo 18 днів тому

    Maybe this Christmas special is Moffat's way of showing he hates Bridgerton

  • @itsjoeycaleb
    @itsjoeycaleb Місяць тому +3

    Love you pronouncing Ncuti correctly :)

  • @zappingspaghetti8231
    @zappingspaghetti8231 Місяць тому

    It feels like they wrote a 15 minute long piece of sad music for the ending but only needed 1 minute of sad scenes

  • @jolively
    @jolively Місяць тому +2

    The time hotel was a great concept. I'd like to see a spin off. Merry Christmas Harbo 🎅

  • @WiloPolis03
    @WiloPolis03 Місяць тому +17

    This special was fine. As a Christian I didn't find the ending to be particularly offensive, given you could still read it as a sort of right-time and right-place circumstantial miracle commemorating the birth of Jesus Christ, but I do completely understand if others of the same faith were more annoyed by it.
    Definitely agree that the stuff with Anita was the best part of the episode, but it did definitely feel out of place and give the episode some clunky pacing. I really liked the sweet, wholesome vibe to the whole episode, even if a lot of the writing kind of felt Chibnall-tier

    • @ChrissieBear
      @ChrissieBear Місяць тому +3

      They really need to stop trying to make the Christmas episodes religious.

    • @WiloPolis03
      @WiloPolis03 Місяць тому

      @ChrissieBear I don't personally mind so long as it's done respectfully, I think Church on Ruby Road was a positive example of this

  • @taylorjames14
    @taylorjames14 Місяць тому +12

    The ending wasn't that weird, the doctor mentions the star can mind control people and that's why the shrine got built, she doesn't decide to kill herself she was possessed to do it and personally I thought Nicola Coughlan's performance was pretty good

    • @HuntingViolets
      @HuntingViolets Місяць тому

      If she was possessed to do it, why does the Doctor accept it and not do something to actually stop her?

    • @taylorjames14
      @taylorjames14 Місяць тому

      @HuntingViolets maybe because this doctor rarely does anything 😂

    • @izzisart
      @izzisart 27 днів тому

      But they play it off like it's a good thing? If they'd really leaned into how horrifying that actually is, it could have been a pretty great/terrifying ending.

  • @Jayforeman3047
    @Jayforeman3047 Місяць тому +2

    I just think it was trying to be two stories at once and the companion we should have cared about (Joy) got hardly any time to flesh her character out, and I think the majority of us ended up caring about Anita more.

  • @kylemccrory8509
    @kylemccrory8509 Місяць тому +6

    Can’t say I agree, I loved this episode

  • @monicaenns9967
    @monicaenns9967 Місяць тому +1

    It might be more of a Red Nose special, but I'm now imagining this Dr visiting the Derry Girls (all 5) at Christmas. Either only Orla figures him out (and just doesn't mention it) or James does , tries to tell everyone, and no one listens 😂

  • @PsyrenXY
    @PsyrenXY Місяць тому +12

    I disagree Harbo, Joy may not be as strong a one-off companion as Sally and Adelaide, but those are literally the cream of the crop. I definitely put her above, say, Kylie Minogue or effing Christina from that bus episode

  • @feiyyin2516
    @feiyyin2516 27 днів тому

    I don’t know, I feel that the Narnia episode was my favorite Christmas special so far, it feels Christmasy.

  • @amelialikesfrogs5778
    @amelialikesfrogs5778 Місяць тому

    lots of great one liners but the best joke has to be the Everest "why are. you taking our equipment? "
    "because it was there"

  • @Zayden5
    @Zayden5 Місяць тому

    When I watched this episode, I wanted him to revisit the receptionist at the end. Correction I was expecting him to revisit the receptionist AGAIN

  • @jameshenry3441
    @jameshenry3441 Місяць тому +1

    I hope any child 5-10 years old is enchanted by this. But this is Steven Moffat's very own tropes and typical story ideas in full swing that he used plenty of times in his era from 2010-2017, and unfortunately that's how I felt watching it.
    The 15th Doctor gets trapped in one time period for a prolonged amount of time! The plot comes to a screeching halt to do this and it's not new territory and it eats into the time we SHOULD be getting to know the big GUEST STAR! The Doctor has been forced to live in one place without escape and without the TARDIS many times so I couldn't quite believe it when Moffat wrote the line "I'm not used to experiencing time in the right order".
    3rd Doctor was exiled to Earth and worked for U.N.I.T so must have had a lot of experience staying put.
    The 10th Doctor as John Smith spent months as a human on Earth in 1913, even though he had no Time Lord memories I think it counts.
    The 11th Doctor spent 900 years, right up to the end of that life in one place on Trenzalore (MOFFAT WROTE THIS ONE)
    The 12th Doctor spent billions of years trapped in a time dial (THIS ONE TOO)
    The 12th Doctor spent apparently decades working at a university (YEP. THIS TOO).
    The 13th Doctor has to spend years in a high security prison!
    And the 14th is currently having tea and biscuits with Donna Noble!
    None of that special was original! Steven Moffat has done ALL OF IT. BEFORE.

  • @SilverStormShadow
    @SilverStormShadow Місяць тому +2

    I think I agree with everything you said, and I also described this episode as really mediocre after watching it. The Long Way Round sequence was great, and Anita is the most interesting and probably my favourite character of the entire 15th Doctor run so far, and I think it's a shame she won't be the new companion, even more so because I really can forsee the next series using the companion as another "Impossible Girl" storyarc, with how much this era has relied on reused ideas. The Sonic The Hedgehog series went through what fans call the "Meta Era" where stories revolved around nostalgia, writing was weak and disappointing, and characters were bland. This came about due to the terrible reception the series faced prior to 2010, largely thanks to Sonic 06. Unfortunately, I think Doctor Who is in a similar state. I was so excited for RTD to come back and bring the show back to its 2005-2010 days of glory, but all we get is mediocre episodes that rehash ideas from said glory days. It really is a shame. I hope I'm wrong and Series 15 brings some great new ideas that really bring the show back, but I'm not holding my breath, especially since the Next Time trailer didn't give us much at all.
    Also, I find it so weird that you gave this episode a D and also gave Voyage of the Damned a D. I personally loved Voyage and was really surprised to see you rank it so low, but I know which Christmas Special I enjoyed watching more this Christmas...

  • @toadtv4389
    @toadtv4389 Місяць тому +9

    I hate that rn in the fandom you can't either criticize or enjoy an episode because you're going to face angry people on both sides.
    The fandom is divided to people who will either call everything woke garbage or people who will swallow and love everything without thinking.
    I'm glad people like you actually take time to criticize Doctor Who coming from a place of love.
    I really liked Season 1 but Joy to the World isn't my cup of tea at all, i think it was a horrible mess ://

  • @GodParticleZero
    @GodParticleZero 18 днів тому

    The 60th specials were anything but a return to form

  • @bsabruzzo
    @bsabruzzo 25 днів тому

    Okay I'm getting that people think that the adjoining doors between two rooms, the one that locks on one side and then the other store that locks on the other side so you can't break into other people's rooms, is this mysterious door phenomenon. And okay I get it because there is something in fantasy where you open the door and there's another door and you open that second door and there's a third door and so on and so forth, see Willy Wonka or Alice in wonderland. And I also get the idea of you open a door and there's a blank wall and then you close the open again there's a portal to open and closing again now it just goes outside and other wacky things. I have not seen this episode so I don't know which thing they use, but the way it sounds from the comments they really miss the Target on this.

  • @mackthisarrowhearth295
    @mackthisarrowhearth295 27 днів тому

    I feel like the biggest problem these shows have is whatever Disney provided or demanded. Everything visially bad looks Disney bad, everything character bad feels Disney bad...

  • @Roxor128
    @Roxor128 Місяць тому

    I really wish they'd give us a moratorium on companions from present-day Earth. The Tom Baker era did it for several years in a row. We had Leela, Romana, Adric, and Nyssa, before ending the moratorium by picking up Tegan in Logopolis. That was a span of 1977 to 1981. More than half of Tom Baker's tenure as The Doctor.
    However, if we DO have to have another one from present-day Earth, I wouldn't object to bringing back Anita for the role.