Was USSR given extra industry to compete with rome? because there's no way they can outproduce all the factories in Italy, France, England, The Balkans, Turkiye, Belgium and parts of Germany. The fact that USSR pulls it back around 1942 suggests that their starting army was weaker but ramped up over time, which seems rather backwards
Thats kinda how Russia is in every war, rocky at the start but gains their footing and turns the tide, sweden, polish-lithuania, france, ww1 (they only pulled out due to civil war, but they were performing extremely well in 1916 and decent in 1917) and of course ww2, etc.
@@HitachiTRQ-225lol wdym they were performing very well in 1916 and 17. I don't think the fact that the germans were overstretched counts as them doing good
@@HitachiTRQ-225not during WW1,but the rest of your point is generally true. One reason the Russians generally did started doing better the longer wars went on is because of how long it took them to mobilise, Russia is a vast country with a relatively low population density and had very little infrastructure before the communists took power.
@@DampedGull2579 yes during ww1, as described by historian indie nydel of „The Great War“ documentary you can find here on youtube, „by January 1916 the Russian supply and industry could be described as simply inexhaustible, the supply issues of the previous years are no more“ and along with the MASSIVE winning streaks they saw that year most famously the Brusilov offensive, in only 8 days the Russian army captured 1/3rd of the austrian army and entire cities worth of austrian and German soldiers surrendered or became casualties (the only thing that stopped the offensive from rolling over austria completely was the northern generals didnt advance in tandem allowing germany to refirect snd reinforce the south). Pretty much every ww1 historian or general history buff acknowledges that if the Bolshevik revolution didnt happen Russia certainly would have won ww1 with their vastly improved tactics and industrial power
@@Counterfactualy_no i point you to my other comment, the germans weren’t overstretched, it was a combination of their massively improved manufacturing and the genius that was Alexei Brusilov that made Russia perform extremely well in 1916, several major successful attacks along with the famous Brusilov offensive made Russia the best performing country in 1916 when compared to the other warring nations
Give everything to a custom country with black colour, " " as its name, and give it a lot of -100% modifiers like -100% recruitable population or -100% resource gain efficiency.
Eh they are too op anyway and win too much I'm happy they lost Soviet Union doesn't win as much since their ai is extremely dumb so I'm happy they finally won one
Was USSR given extra industry to compete with rome? because there's no way they can outproduce all the factories in Italy, France, England, The Balkans, Turkiye, Belgium and parts of Germany. The fact that USSR pulls it back around 1942 suggests that their starting army was weaker but ramped up over time, which seems rather backwards
Thats kinda how Russia is in every war, rocky at the start but gains their footing and turns the tide, sweden, polish-lithuania, france, ww1 (they only pulled out due to civil war, but they were performing extremely well in 1916 and decent in 1917) and of course ww2, etc.
@@HitachiTRQ-225lol wdym they were performing very well in 1916 and 17. I don't think the fact that the germans were overstretched counts as them doing good
@@HitachiTRQ-225not during WW1,but the rest of your point is generally true. One reason the Russians generally did started doing better the longer wars went on is because of how long it took them to mobilise, Russia is a vast country with a relatively low population density and had very little infrastructure before the communists took power.
@@DampedGull2579 yes during ww1, as described by historian indie nydel of „The Great War“ documentary you can find here on youtube, „by January 1916 the Russian supply and industry could be described as simply inexhaustible, the supply issues of the previous years are no more“ and along with the MASSIVE winning streaks they saw that year most famously the Brusilov offensive, in only 8 days the Russian army captured 1/3rd of the austrian army and entire cities worth of austrian and German soldiers surrendered or became casualties (the only thing that stopped the offensive from rolling over austria completely was the northern generals didnt advance in tandem allowing germany to refirect snd reinforce the south). Pretty much every ww1 historian or general history buff acknowledges that if the Bolshevik revolution didnt happen Russia certainly would have won ww1 with their vastly improved tactics and industrial power
@@Counterfactualy_no i point you to my other comment, the germans weren’t overstretched, it was a combination of their massively improved manufacturing and the genius that was Alexei Brusilov that made Russia perform extremely well in 1916, several major successful attacks along with the famous Brusilov offensive made Russia the best performing country in 1916 when compared to the other warring nations
The soviets are definitely buffed, or rome never cored much of their land
Communitas Proletaritasque Romana ‼️❓⁉️❗🗣️🗣️🔥🔥
How do you make the places that aren't fighting with no name or divisions?
Give everything to a custom country with black colour, " " as its name, and give it a lot of -100% modifiers like -100% recruitable population or -100% resource gain efficiency.
the Polish borders are really weird, even base hoi4 does a better job
I think we were all sad about Rome losing
Eh they are too op anyway and win too much I'm happy they lost Soviet Union doesn't win as much since their ai is extremely dumb so I'm happy they finally won one
@@doger6531ye
Do Greater Russia vs Greater China
You mean the Russian empire?
Bruh how
wtf is this scenario