Ss(2) says that provision of ss1 shall not apply in case of assignment devolution and transposition which means that the party added will be deemed to be a party from the date when the suit was instituted and not when he was added but you are saying just the opposite.. and this has confused me..please clarify
if when B's LR was added as party, He, as per your explanation, shall be considered to be added on that very day only and not earlier. isn't this same as clause 1?
Double discretion of court waala point samazh nhi aaya - 1. Court can be satisfied with good faith argument and make C party from back date 2. Court can reject good faith and make C party from date of actual initiation of suit against C. But in (2) C will claim - hit by limitation So court only has 1 discretion only i.e. to agree to good faith or not.
Madam please request h criminal certified form C.A-I k Rules ko with judgements explain kijiye please kyonki ek aam public's ko to inhi ki jyaada jarurat padti hai wo to inhi me jyaada deal karti hai.
Thank you so much. I've been troubled with Limitation Act for a long time. Your beautifully clear explanations make it crystal.
Beautiful explanations by beautiful maam!
Stay blessed!
Nyc lectures with clear concepts👍
Ss(2) says that provision of ss1 shall not apply in case of assignment devolution and transposition which means that the party added will be deemed to be a party from the date when the suit was instituted and not when he was added but you are saying just the opposite..
and this has confused me..please clarify
Right
During pendency of suit if he joins he will be made party when he joined...not as on the date of institution of suit
Yes please clarify that.
Right
Keep shining like star...
You deserve millions subscribers & likes.
Stay Blessed mam.
Bdia👌
Thanks maam bahut achhe se deal ki h aap limitation act
Excellent lecture 👍
Keep it up , nice 👍
@4:41 suit instituted mana hi kese jayega kyuki "A" barred by limitation hogya to "C"against suit kese institute hoskta?
if when B's LR was added as party, He, as per your explanation, shall be considered to be added on that very day only and not earlier. isn't this same as clause 1?
Sunder.... thanks...ap aacha kr rahi..
Thank u mem
Yes cristal clear as u mention everything
Double discretion of court waala point samazh nhi aaya -
1. Court can be satisfied with good faith argument and make C party from back date
2. Court can reject good faith and make C party from date of actual initiation of suit against C.
But in (2) C will claim - hit by limitation
So court only has 1 discretion only i.e. to agree to good faith or not.
The way u r explaining is so good but it would be better if u explain through mentioning dates..
Excellent teaching 👏
Tamiz se baat kar cheater kisey bol rhi hai ..?
Thank You madam❤
Thankyou Mam🌞
Madam what is the time limitation for impleading party in civil suit?
CAN A PLAINTIFF BE SUBSTITUTED IN A SUIT WHEN HE IS NOT A FAMILY MEMBER OR LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE IN A PLAINT?
Thank you
Bohot hard madam ji
Thank you mam
Madam please request h criminal certified form C.A-I k Rules ko with judgements explain kijiye please kyonki ek aam public's ko to inhi ki jyaada jarurat padti hai wo to inhi me jyaada deal karti hai.
O1r10(5) per kya limitation prevail kar jyega
Yes
Kindly explain assignment lil bit
ढिले अँपलीकेशन कंडोन जजमेट कीतने दिन मेआती
I am really sorry to say mam but you are not right on sub sec 2 .
Mam aap 21(2) mein clear nahi hai...
Or isme konse teer marne baki rah gye