Hey, everyone! Do you want more videos about exoplanets? If you are a fan of our videos, feel free to support our project here: ➥ Support us on UA-cam - www.youtube.com/@kosmo_off/join ➥ Support us on Patreon - www.patreon.com/kosmo_off
The evolution of planets and solar systems make space travel really tricky. Mars used to have an ocean. We had freakin dinosaurs on our planet at one point. Which, I think is amazing.
Yes but also Europa, Enceladus and other water / ice moons in the Solar system - the environment at the bottom of the sea on Europa, which has definitely got under water volcanoes (Io the neighbouring moon is the most volcanic body in the Solar system), seems very similar to the ecosystems found on the ocean floor where there is volcanism.
I’m no expert but most of these exoplanets they claim to most resemble earth like conditions near red dwarfs seem unlikely to me. First you got the tidal locking factor which in itself is a big hindering factor. Earth is not only not tidally locked but even has the moon for extra stability. Second you got the radiation from the host red dwarfs due to its close proximity. Thirdly how do you get a magnetic field to deflect the radiation if you got no rotation due to tidal locking. Just too many unfavourable facts for the exoplanets next to red dwarfs to score so high on this index. Venus is a great example of a planet being so favourable outwardly due to its exact similar size composition and even laying within the inner bounds of the habitable zone yet just that slight distance difference and slow rotation makes it a completely uninhabitable world. So Venus with all its similarities is already extremely different and yet scientists are convinced that these vastly different exoplanets near red dwarfs are more favourable then Venus is. Im just not convinced.
Venus is actually behind the edge of habitable zone now but it used to be in the zone hundreds of milions years ago. Earth will also be in 550 million years too hot to host life - all oceans will evaporate. In Solar system the habitable zone is moving toward Mars as the Sun becomes hotter and brighter withing it's life. Moreover - there is a theory that Venus could have been supporting life however there was a cataclysm that caused the moon of Venus escaped... Possibly this moon is even a Mercury (maybe it escaped after something hit the moon or maybe it's just a matter of getting to far away from Venus - our Moon also will escape one day in around 1 billion years). Venus started slowing down the rotation and losing the magnetic field (as dinamo inside of the Venus was also stopping rotation - now it rotates very slow, Earth 24 hours, and Venus around 400 days). The core has become solid and Venus turned into hostile world... I totally agree that there are so many conditions that must be met to be able to host life on the other planets that there is very little chance of finding planets like Earth or creatures like Human - intelligent. Look at the dinosaurs - even though they existed 100 times longer on Earth than homo-sapiens they haven't developed enough large brain to evolve in intelligent creature.... beside it - human needed like hundred of millons years of evolution from one specie to another, and finally the catastrophic accident the hit of the asteroid caused and gave a change to mammals to develop that creature... in a few million years... It's amazing and probably very rare to happen (additionally to that fact that earthlike planets are rare). I recommend reading book: Rare Earth: Why Complex Life is Uncommon in the Universe of Peter D. Ward and Donald Brownlee.
@@Ultra_Ego_Putin Teegarden is lucky for us because at its insanely high parallax (short distance), JWST can actually see its planets and take away the speculation. Honestly I agree that T-b is most likely something like Proxima b, an irradiated waste. We should be looking into K stars, not Ms
I have zero doubt there are plenty of planets out there that are not only similar but IDENTICAL to Earth. No doubt about it. Finding them though is like looking for a certain needle in a stack of needles the size of the sun.
yes but that start has a life span as main sequence of 1 trillion years . Compared with Sun that has 12 billions yrs. Like could appear and get extincted several folds on those planets
What would intelligent life look like in a place that has constant daylight? It's never night. They never saw the stars except the sun. Do they even imagine that the universe exists?
Hubble space telescope: I just discovered the most Earth like planet... James Webb space telescope: hold my coolant tank... As always koooosmos 1st in space.
@@Ahtisham take a good look at the ultra deep field images from Hubble ... keep in mind that those images cover a minuscule part of the night sky yet in that tiny view exists an incomprehensible amount of planets and stars the image I mentioned " ultra deep field" should be enough to reevaluate your opinion.
@@davidgalea6113 I'm not denying that there aren't any worlds like earth i literally said "As far as we know", we might have found similar planets that could support life but we don't know anything yet,so you might wanna read my comment again.
@@Ahtisham" Our Earth is the only planet (as far as we know)" does not matter what we know... there are other earths ..I don't know who is going to win the lottery but I know someone is going to win eventually..same reasoning applies to earth like planets. "a perfect planet for life in this whole universe" utter nonsense.. the universe is bigger than you can even imagine..
@@davidgalea6113 there could be other earths lmao I'm not denying,i just added that we don't know of them just yet, I don't what do you want from this argument but I'm not gonna argue anymore 😂
The ESI scale should be -10 to + 10, earth being +10. I would give Teagarden a 1. A Red dwarf star is a flare star emitting deadly radiation. It doesnt have a large moon probably. Wind speeds and atmosphere composition are unknown. Earth has not been 28c average temperature for 3 billion years. To above +5, a planet needs to have a very similar star to sol.
And isn't it true that red dwarf stars settle down the older it gets? Younger stars are much more dangerous and the very old ones are more stable and much less dangerous (dwarf red stars that is).
@@patricialessard8651 Pretty much, though they have been found to flare more near the poles rather than the orbital plane so that lessens the danger level.
Thank you both for the information it was very much appreciated. I do know those stars will get extremely old like what was stated. I've read somewhere that no one has seen the end of dwarf red star yet. Not sure if it's true or not, but that indeed is a long life.
Teegarden B. Great!! Until I found out it was tidally locked. Solar flares could be happening frequently. Oh well. With our current technology it would take over 38,000 years to get there. So I guess we won't be landing there anytime soon!
I think that we shouldn't even look at any systems that don't have G-class stars. Red dwarf stars are too volatile and small to give us positive results.
A magnetic field should be the first item on the list! Teegarden b would be an interesting planet to explore! Radiation protocols would have to be strict!
Spending trillion of dollars searching for something that can be completely unsafe but can't invest all that money in healing the planet we on yeah okay 👍🏾
Well, many forms of life here on Earth have survived and even thrived in living conditions that are far from ideal. (Deep sea divers, creatures in the Mariana Trench, organisms in dark, freezing temperatures, the hottest, driest deserts, people climbing Mt. Everest; , etc. we evolve and we eventually adapt to our environments over time. So I wouldn’t be surprised if life could eventually evolve to be able to live comfortably on some of these planets.
Hey @Kosmo #Kosmo, what is the name/creator name of that song at the end of the video? Well done once again! Thanks for keeping us updated on Strange New Worlds!
i heard there might be different subtle beings on certain stars and planets, like Sirius, Arcturus, Procyon, Lyra, Pleaides, in parts of them, where they are the most advanced in terms of high vibrational light bodies of Divine Love, harmony, beauty, compassion, peace, joy, laughter, gentleness, Divine Feminine, etc...These are the ones i'm interested in, but no one will be able to see those beings unless they have some inner vision....i almost can't stand a lot of the horrific, hellish planets, which are most, it seems....They are very scary....Alcyoneous looks pretty highly advanced in the above qualities, just from the looks of it...i looked for footage of those stars and planets mentioned above but there were hardly any...i can't believe that...i think the Pleaides is somewhat nearby, but don't see any real footage of it....i think very high vibrational stars and planets are extremely rare...most look very scary....i know i don't want to be in a human body a whole lot longer...i really don't like it....When i was a teenager, a certain species of The Greys, (lower vibrational), abducted me, but i blacked out...they were very aggressive and terrifying, and i don't recommend getting mixed up with them, although i heard the tall white Greys are not as harmful, but i don't know for sure...The tall greys are still not considered high vibrational though...
Tidaly locked doesnt make it impossible life can still exist in the terminator zone Where its just forever sunset or twilight and the temp is just right And the radiation is lower there So life is less likely but not impossible.
We should be looking at stars that are very similar or exactly like our own. This would then likely mean that its habitable zone would be close to what our own is and if there is a planet there it would be likely that is very similar to Earth as well. Looking at red dwarfs will ultimately get us nowhere because any planet orbiting in its habitable zone is bound to be tidally locked and its orbital period only lasting a couple of days which is very likely not going to be able to support human life. We need that 365 days orbital cycle to function properly due to our biological rhythm and also we depend on oxygen. Some recent studies show that oxygen production depends on slow day/night cycle that Earth has. Plus the planet has to have almost exact axial rotation as our own (about 24 hours) and likely also a big enough moon to promote tides (tides are important for ocean life cycle and currents). So looking at planets that have far less than that is pointless because first of all, oxygen production would likely not be good enough to sustain us, if that planet could contain oxygen atmosphere at all due to close proximity to its star. Bottom line, we should be looking to first of all find G type main sequence stars that have similar or exact temperature as our own, and only then look at its planets. Stop wasting time on these small stars that are clearly not good enough to sustain us. We found thousands of planets so far, but none seem to have panned out as a potential ''next earth'', because we are looking in the wrong places. Now im no expert by any means but this is what i found by reading various papers on the topic
The problem at finding a star that is similar or exactly like our own is the collapsing gas cloud would have to have almost exactly the same make-up as the cloud that made our sun and would also need to almost exactly the same mass as well , so far we've discovered more than two thousand exo-solar systems and ours seems to be the odd one out...
struckture the galaxcy 1st then ACCESSSORIES = PLANET / STAR / BLA2 Paham tak??????? when we done struckture the [ROUTE / MAPING GALAXCY / BASE ON THE HOW BIG IS THE ROUTE TO CIRCLE THE SUN / MOOON / DEPENDS / IF LOCATIONS IS TO HUGE THEN 2 SUN/MOON . SIMPLE DOL!!!! STRUCKTURE 1ST C THE ROUTE OF MAPING DO NOT MAKE THEM CIRCLE THE WHOLE UNIVERSE MAKEIT THE ROUTE SMALLER / ARRANGE THE GALLAXCY / NOT DIFICULT RITE MY INSTRUCTIONS TEAM ? SIMPLE RITE
If we were only looking for life such as we have on earth of course. Even on earth we have many examples of extremophiles that tolerate extreme pressures, extremely high/low Ph, temperatures that we certainly cannot, radiation, etc. It shouldn't be much of a stretch to think that things elsewhere formed to tolerate extremes in ways that we cannot imagine.
I would not exclude Teegarden c yet, though. An Earth-like planet has active volcanoes pumping up a lot of CO2 into the atmosphere; the volcanoes do not care about the amount of energy that the planet gets from its star and its surface temperature. Now, iIf the planet is covered in ice, then there is little if any evaporation. Thus, no rains. CO2 is not removed from the atmosphere and piles up, producing a powerful greenhouse effect that eventually thaws the icy surface. Once an ocean is formed, rains begin and start removing CO2 from the atmosphere, stabilising the CO2 levels and the temperature around 10-20 C. There is some strong indication that Earth itself went through "Ice-ball" phases, when it was covered in ice and glaciers down to the equator. However, Earth volcanoes thawed it. I am more worried about the possibility that UV flux and stellar wind - both of which are particularly strong around a red dwarf - may have eroded the atmosphere. Teegarden's star is not a very "active" red dwarf; but what it produces might already be enough to slowly strip both Teegarden B and C from their atmospheres over geological eras. This is what you get if you orbit a star that close...
I believe that from a terraformation standpoint, rather than looking to run and colonize an already perfect planet, a cold earth like Teegarden C is more ideal for being harnessed on a higher technological level. What I'm looking at is whether a planet has enough gravity for us to walk on the surface, no life so that we could develop it without any ethical concerns, and stable enough that it could get turned into a movable planet with huge propulsion systems and taken out of the original system entirely. A planet like Venus is actually perfect for terraformation also, but rather than trying to make a miracle atmosphere like our own, which is fragile, I think we need to look at covering a planet with a diamond glass geodesic dome all the way around. Actually multiple layers. That way, we could customize the atmosphere within far quicker, almost as soon as the dome is constructed, and the conditions inside the dome could be kept warm even in deep space all the way away from a star. What is extraordinary about a planet like Teegarden B is that its possibly teeming with life, who knows what type of plants exist there but we could be looking at new sources of plant based food and beneficial atmospheric regulators like trees even when these planets don't have any creatures like humans upon them. The ideal in my eyes is taking beneficial life forms to one of those hot or cold earth's without any life, but a sturdier crust, building up an exocrust for strength and stability, building a geodesic dome to contain an atmosphere and protect from impacts, and then collecting those types of hot or cold earth's together into a new type of galactic hyperstructure made only of planets and no stars. The planets could be made to orbit inside of a hyperdome the size of a dwarf system with a central heating element, space elevators connecting all the planets and the ability to move the entire system to keep looking for more planets to add. This system right here is exciting because the first step towards that could get taken quite close to us, even if it means we find a cold, lifeless earth sized rock with nothing but ice on it. That type of rock has to get the miners and engineers in us all excited because we would have far more longevity and safety on such a planet than the wild one that we come from, where everything suits us temporarily but is so subject to change. I think that all in all, when you look at planets through the lens of terraformation, an earth like planet such as Teegarden C is more cut out for us as masters of technology and space mining than one lile Teegarden B, which is probably wild like earth and more dangerous, less movable, and could even come with a hostile humanoid like species who wouldn't want us messing with their home. The uninhabited earth's are the real treasures in my eyes, amazing to think how many systems have ones that aren't gonna be looked at as lucrative by the thinkers of yesteryear despite untold heaping mountains of precious metals and such waiting to be harnessed... it's an exciting time to be into astronomy
Even though the planet is out of the habitable zone, life could still be supported close to the ocean floor, as the life would be warm by the planets core.
Funny how we talk about finding micro-organisms on Earth-like planets but not fully developed intelligent species as if every planet is by standard a host for lower life forms than ours.
"Ever since people found out there are other worlds out there, this question has been preying on their minds: Are these worlds suitable for life? Do aliens really exist? Have they heard the Good News about Jesus Christ yet? If not, how soon can we go there to convert them?"
While I think this is fascinating and I wish we had the technology to go see these planets and explore them ourselves, I can’t help but wonder… How do they know the compositions of these exoplanets? They can’t see them except as a wobble in the light from their host star or perhaps a spot in front of the star. So how do scientists know it’s a rocky planet with a solid core, a mantle and a thin crust like Earth? How do they determine the temperature and off and what type of atmosphere these planets have? Yeah, they use mathematical processes to determine temperature, but I’d like to know the exact process and how they came up with it. I mean… is this something we can put even a little faith in or are these scientists just pulling these equations out their butts and saying, “Yeah, that sounds pretty good”? Maybe you could do a video explaining the process a bit more so we know that we may not be alone in our galaxy and that these scientists aren’t just pulling these things out of nowhere to make us feel better and give us false hope.
Look up spectral analysis. They split the light reflected from these worlds into it's spectral components, from which it is possible to determine the composition of their atmospheres. Additionally, the size of the planets, and weather patterns can be determined from their orbital speed, distance from the stars which they orbit, and the amount of radiation / energy emanated by the stars which they orbit. Literally all these different mentioned aspects of the planets can be calculated simply by analysing their images which are captured by the telescopes. No scientist ever "pulls equations out of their butts"; they literally wouldn't be scientists if they did that, as by definition, science without clear evidence and understanding of relevant facts, isn't science at all
To gain all of this information, all you need is a powerful telescope like the one which they used, and the relevant knowledge. A 2nd year college student (in some cases, even AP Physics high school students) can perform all these calculations and evaluations with ease
@@guyfawkes6428 yup you got it right and they compare other planets spectral analysis to ours like say a genetic code to see how similar or different they are
The first thing is you discover how to accomplish super luminal speed! Even if tomorrow we find a dead ringer to earth, if it is a half of a light year ! We can’t get there!
human raise will be long time gone by the time anybody reach that planet,,,i like the way the narrator said the distance "is just"12 and a half light yrs away ,,,,,"just "😂,,,,,what he he should be sayin is the distance is unreachable by any human. and thats the truth
If we can’t rule out life on a planet 12 light years away I’m not sure how life on Venus is “totally out of the question”. Venus has atmospheric anomalies that remain unexplained but suggest life is possible.
I wonder if "most" humans think when we look for other exoplanets or planets suitable for life....that we are looking at that them for our potential future move. not thinking for a second that there may be someone already there.
@@BingBingBongBong ok bud, simple reply. Do you even understand how they discover these planets? They can't even see them. They see light dimming from stars and base conclusions from that. Maybe study up on that and reply
You know the narrator is beyond optimistic when he explains the planet is "only" 12 light years away. Consider that our Solar System is "only" .00127 as measured in light years. Unless we develop a propulsion system that works not only in theory we might not be able to go beyond our backyard. It's an approximate 3 year ride to Europa. Hop aboard!
I think mankind will crack it eventually... the theoretical physics of faster than light space travel has already been laid out so the real challenge would be the engineering and the energy requirements.... I believe it will be possible but unfortunately won't be in our lifetime
If you really want to trip, at home of course, sync this video at 2min 30 to the start of the song "Blinded By The Light". Not detracting from THE finest video produced by Kosmo, just, magical how it all times perfectly to that one song, try it. It is amazing the synchronicity. Thanks, glad you are back to the videos and hopefully feeling better. Much to all. D.
If we could even develop an engine that can travel 99% the speed of light we could send probes in our lifetime to a bunch of exoplanets and maybe even astronauts down the road
@@HunterOneMillion I saw a few videos about plasma shields which would protect the spacecraft from dust particles and they were able to implement them I think reaching that speed is what our biggest issue is at the moment
BleedGreenNation ... The Americans have been travelling in space since at least 2003, They currently seem to have three star ships that cost trillions of dollars. They are operated by the military and are as follows "The USS Curtis LeMay" "The USS Hoyt Vandenberg" and "The USS Roscoe Hillenkoetter" they are crewed by a joint human alien crew (two different types of ET). The tech that is used to operate them is ET tech, that's why it is a joint adventure. The craft have human crew personnel from several countries besides the US.
@@BleedGreenNation Well if you're actually going 99% the speed of light, you only really need to shield the very front of your ship. But if your going say 20%, which is much more doable, then you would need to encapsulate the entire thing in thick armour.
Hey Kosmo, A beautiful video and very well narrated, but I confess it greatly troubles me! Primarily because all of this talk of exoplanets and “super Earths” tend to create a false sense of “other options” in the minds of so many people (and especially among those who “don’t need no education…”. “We don’t have to save the Earth, we’ll all just go live on an exoplanet!” No you won’t! 7+ billion people? Even if Mars could be “terraformed” (which it can’t, by the way… Elon Musk is an idiot, jus’ sayin’), the bare logistics of transporting even a few thousand people there is almost incomprehensible! And to spend six months cooped up in, say, the “Starship” (Why do we let that character get away with calling it that? It’s barely a “low Earth orbit”ship!), to spend the rest of their short lives in a quonset hut the size of a convenience store? I guarantee someone is going to open the port halfway there! Since I’m on that subject, the only way Mars will be made habitable for humanity is to send humanoid and super-humanoid robots ahead in waves, to then construct underground cities to protect us from radiation and to allow a sufficiently large environment for humans to thrive. Not Elon’s Buck Rogers nonsense (about as well considered as the T-Rump’s ridiculous “Space Force”)! And planet “b,” as illustrated, seriously looks like Hell! Tidally locked? Red dwarf star? You can cancel MY timeshare right now, tell you what! Finally, until we manage to create (or reverse engineer… kudos out to Bob Lazar!) a WARP DRIVE (probably possible, but a lot less eminent than nuclear fusion), we’re not going ANYWHERE anytime SOON! Sorry if I’m popping anyone’s bubble, but these are the factors we have to consider. I know many people have a very “cowboys in space / Star Wars” vision of all this (and by the way, the Millennium Falcon doesn’t go “whoosh” in space, my science challenged friends… if Stanley Kubrick was in space we couldn’t hear HIM scream either, though I’m pretty sure he’d want to!)… So maybe we should have another look at trying to save THIS planet, ya think? Still, a beautiful, well produced, and visually compelling program! I do look forward to your future undertakings, though I’d hope you might focus more on things like, say, saving THIS planet? With infinite love and gratitude, your friend… -Glenn C. B. Jones
@@AlexOfTheCastle Down with that, Alex! I'll see you that and raise you,,, Could the space faring nations of the planet (and the almost ALL are now!) perhaps band together to create a "line of defense," with operational capacities, in the NOT ALL THAT UNLIKELY EVENT that another ''''bunch of gravel' from the Taurid Meteor "Shower" may elect to visit another round of "hellfire and damnation" upon the Earth, as it did at the Younger-Dryas event, around 13,000 years ago, extinguishing the extremely advanced civilization that was formerly extant here (unlimited remote power?... anti-gravity?)? If you are curious about this, check out Ben at "Uncharted X" on YT, who I find to be the most scientific and science referencing on the subject, though Graham Hancock and Brien Foerster also "bring the pain" quite believably! If, however, you can believe that Egypt, a civilization lacking both trees and wheels, with slaves pulling train car sized blocks on SAND with wooden ROLLERS (they could figure out "rollers," but, slap forehead, the WHEEL totally escaped them!), in 20 YEARS, you may be beyond hope! And these childhood fictions are still being ACTIVELY propagated! Just the other night I saw this site boldly putting forth this drivel, and even indicating (with, I will say beautiful footage!) which Pharaohs were buried in which pyramids! As NO mummies have EVER been discovered in ANY pyramid, so I'm calling this active nescient disinformation! The late, great Gene Shoemaker (he of, you might recall, the Shoemaker-Levy Comet, which humanity was privileged to PHOTOGRAPH crashing into Jupiter, any chunk of which would likely have extinguished ALL life on Earth, not just we dinosaurs!) said, in words to the effect of "And the one that gets us we probably won't even see coming!" As the wonderful Planetary Society (planetary.org) has said, and emblazoned on posters, mugs and T-shirts, "Stay Unextinct!" Love to Alex and all... -- Glenn C. B. Jones 3rd Planet Out (seriously!) PS: How, my friends, do you manage to keep it so BRIEF?
Well actually I believe what we should look for is the least earth like planet . Because everything on each could be completely different for say aliens . Born different places for one so where we can't breathe maby they can where we can't go they could live.
Hey, everyone! Do you want more videos about exoplanets?
If you are a fan of our videos, feel free to support our project here:
➥ Support us on UA-cam - www.youtube.com/@kosmo_off/join
➥ Support us on Patreon - www.patreon.com/kosmo_off
Yes yes yes yes
YES!!
Oh.... Yesssssssssss😍
Yes. Could you please make a video about the Dipole Repeller?
Yes
Yes
Imagine if this planet has a video about our own planet.
😂
And they would come up with reasons why our planet is flawed and maybe not suitable for life.
Even surprising is the fact that they spot USA and found the countless genders and gave up the idea of nuking us 😢
Horrible
I'm sure they would give our planet a weird name with many numbers, just like how we do with Exo-Planets. 😂
The evolution of planets and solar systems make space travel really tricky.
Mars used to have an ocean.
We had freakin dinosaurs on our planet at one point. Which, I think is amazing.
It really is pretty remarkable we’re even alive on this planet. So many things Needed to go right in the past for us to be around right now
Bro
Nothing to do with luck. Designed that way.
Designed by who ?
you ever think that if aliens came here, they would probably turn into blob-fishes because they might be so used to high gravity planets
@@danielbrstak5730 earth is just one in trillions. It's not designed it's just exist
Yes but also Europa, Enceladus and other water / ice moons in the Solar system - the environment at the bottom of the sea on Europa, which has definitely got under water volcanoes (Io the neighbouring moon is the most volcanic body in the Solar system), seems very similar to the ecosystems found on the ocean floor where there is volcanism.
Not enough sun radiation
Fascinating. Where can I get a ticket to TeeGarden B? This one's turning into ClownWorld Z.
I’m no expert but most of these exoplanets they claim to most resemble earth like conditions near red dwarfs seem unlikely to me.
First you got the tidal locking factor which in itself is a big hindering factor. Earth is not only not tidally locked but even has the moon for extra stability.
Second you got the radiation from the host red dwarfs due to its close proximity. Thirdly how do you get a magnetic field to deflect the radiation if you got no rotation due to tidal locking.
Just too many unfavourable facts for the exoplanets next to red dwarfs to score so high on this index.
Venus is a great example of a planet being so favourable outwardly due to its exact similar size composition and even laying within the inner bounds of the habitable zone yet just that slight distance difference and slow rotation makes it a completely uninhabitable world. So Venus with all its similarities is already extremely different and yet scientists are convinced that these vastly different exoplanets near red dwarfs are more favourable then Venus is. Im just not convinced.
They have no clue what an earthlike exoplanet looks like that far away. It's all speculation thus far.
It’s over 250 billion of them in the galaxy, hopefully another one did get lucky
Venus is actually behind the edge of habitable zone now but it used to be in the zone hundreds of milions years ago. Earth will also be in 550 million years too hot to host life - all oceans will evaporate. In Solar system the habitable zone is moving toward Mars as the Sun becomes hotter and brighter withing it's life.
Moreover - there is a theory that Venus could have been supporting life however there was a cataclysm that caused the moon of Venus escaped... Possibly this moon is even a Mercury (maybe it escaped after something hit the moon or maybe it's just a matter of getting to far away from Venus - our Moon also will escape one day in around 1 billion years). Venus started slowing down the rotation and losing the magnetic field (as dinamo inside of the Venus was also stopping rotation - now it rotates very slow, Earth 24 hours, and Venus around 400 days). The core has become solid and Venus turned into hostile world...
I totally agree that there are so many conditions that must be met to be able to host life on the other planets that there is very little chance of finding planets like Earth or creatures like Human - intelligent. Look at the dinosaurs - even though they existed 100 times longer on Earth than homo-sapiens they haven't developed enough large brain to evolve in intelligent creature.... beside it - human needed like hundred of millons years of evolution from one specie to another, and finally the catastrophic accident the hit of the asteroid caused and gave a change to mammals to develop that creature... in a few million years... It's amazing and probably very rare to happen (additionally to that fact that earthlike planets are rare). I recommend reading book: Rare Earth: Why Complex Life is Uncommon in the Universe of Peter D. Ward and Donald Brownlee.
@@MrWinotu if we could make the jump to colonize mars we could exist another billion yrs after earth has been uninhabitable by the expanding sun.
@@Ultra_Ego_Putin Teegarden is lucky for us because at its insanely high parallax (short distance), JWST can actually see its planets and take away the speculation.
Honestly I agree that T-b is most likely something like Proxima b, an irradiated waste. We should be looking into K stars, not Ms
I have zero doubt there are plenty of planets out there that are not only similar but IDENTICAL to Earth. No doubt about it. Finding them though is like looking for a certain needle in a stack of needles the size of the sun.
Every time we get a planet like this, it has to be tidally locked!
Always
yes but that start has a life span as main sequence of 1 trillion years . Compared with Sun that has 12 billions yrs. Like could appear and get extincted several folds on those planets
We would not know until we send a probe and rover to check for its liquid water sources and goldilocks zone as well.
What would intelligent life look like in a place that has constant daylight? It's never night. They never saw the stars except the sun. Do they even imagine that the universe exists?
Excellent question
Hubble space telescope: I just discovered the most Earth like planet...
James Webb space telescope: hold my coolant tank...
As always koooosmos 1st in space.
Please re-introduce the "KooOOOssssmmoooo" in the intro before "The first in outer space" :D
Our Earth is the only planet (as far as we know) a perfect planet for life in this whole universe
@@lmac3375 lol that's ok
@@Ahtisham take a good look at the ultra deep field images from Hubble ... keep in mind that those images cover a minuscule part of the night sky yet in that tiny view exists an incomprehensible amount of planets and stars the image I mentioned " ultra deep field" should be enough to reevaluate your opinion.
@@davidgalea6113 I'm not denying that there aren't any worlds like earth i literally said "As far as we know", we might have found similar planets that could support life but we don't know anything yet,so you might wanna read my comment again.
@@Ahtisham" Our Earth is the only planet (as far as we know)" does not matter what we know... there are other earths ..I don't know who is going to win the lottery but I know someone is going to win eventually..same reasoning applies to earth like planets. "a perfect planet for life in this whole universe" utter nonsense.. the universe is bigger than you can even imagine..
@@davidgalea6113 there could be other earths lmao I'm not denying,i just added that we don't know of them just yet, I don't what do you want from this argument but I'm not gonna argue anymore 😂
I dream about the Kosmo's at least once a week.
The ESI scale should be -10 to + 10, earth being +10. I would give Teagarden a 1. A Red dwarf star is a flare star emitting deadly radiation. It doesnt have a large moon probably. Wind speeds and atmosphere composition are unknown. Earth has not been 28c average temperature for 3 billion years. To above +5, a planet needs to have a very similar star to sol.
Keep in mind, red dwarves have been found to flare nearer the stellar poles rather than the orbital planes
And isn't it true that red dwarf stars settle down the older it gets? Younger stars are much more dangerous and the very old ones are more stable and much less dangerous (dwarf red stars that is).
@@patricialessard8651 Pretty much, though they have been found to flare more near the poles rather than the orbital plane so that lessens the danger level.
Thank you both for the information it was very much appreciated. I do know those stars will get extremely old like what was stated. I've read somewhere that no one has seen the end of dwarf red star yet. Not sure if it's true or not, but that indeed is a long life.
@@TheDredConspiracy TRAPPIST-1 can supposedly live for trillions of years
Teegarden B. Great!! Until I found out it was tidally locked. Solar flares could be happening frequently. Oh well. With our current technology it would take over 38,000 years to get there. So I guess we won't be landing there anytime soon!
I think that we shouldn't even look at any systems that don't have G-class stars. Red dwarf stars are too volatile and small to give us positive results.
same here
They are out there somewhere 🤗
Lots of Galaxy’s in the Universe. 👍
Evolution goes absolutely crazy on every one of them. 😎👍
I hope we develop something in my lifetime that can travel to these planets and take pictures .
Am I the only one that thinks this channel has some pretty great soundtracks with their videos?
A magnetic field should be the first item on the list! Teegarden b would be an interesting planet to explore! Radiation protocols would have to be strict!
Teegarden b. - ESI= 0.95, 13 light years away. 👨🚀🧑🚀My next space travel destination.
Anticipating some more wonderful information from your Chanel welcomed me. Thankyou!¡!¡! 💫👾💫🖖👁️✨
Spending trillion of dollars searching for something that can be completely unsafe but can't invest all that money in healing the planet we on yeah okay 👍🏾
a planet is not a world. everything is the world and we just live on a planet in the world
Excellent!!! Thank you, Kosmo!
Well, many forms of life here on Earth have survived and even thrived in living conditions that are far from ideal. (Deep sea divers, creatures in the Mariana Trench, organisms in dark, freezing temperatures, the hottest, driest deserts, people climbing Mt. Everest; , etc.
we evolve and we eventually adapt to our environments over time.
So I wouldn’t be surprised if life could eventually evolve to be able to live comfortably on some of these planets.
The whole planet is a garden full of tea plants.
I'd just be too tired from drinking tea...
Whatever kind of life there may be out there it will certainly be nothing like us.😎
Hey @Kosmo #Kosmo, what is the name/creator name of that song at the end of the video? Well done once again! Thanks for keeping us updated on Strange New Worlds!
If you still want the name of the song, it's "Hampus Naeselius - Where Heroes Come to Die"
i heard there might be different subtle beings on certain stars and planets, like Sirius, Arcturus, Procyon, Lyra, Pleaides, in parts of them, where they are the most advanced in terms of high vibrational light bodies of Divine Love, harmony, beauty, compassion, peace, joy, laughter, gentleness, Divine Feminine, etc...These are the ones i'm interested in, but no one will be able to see those beings unless they have some inner vision....i almost can't stand a lot of the horrific, hellish planets, which are most, it seems....They are very scary....Alcyoneous looks pretty highly advanced in the above qualities, just from the looks of it...i looked for footage of those stars and planets mentioned above but there were hardly any...i can't believe that...i think the Pleaides is somewhat nearby, but don't see any real footage of it....i think very high vibrational stars and planets are extremely rare...most look very scary....i know i don't want to be in a human body a whole lot longer...i really don't like it....When i was a teenager, a certain species of The Greys, (lower vibrational), abducted me, but i blacked out...they were very aggressive and terrifying, and i don't recommend getting mixed up with them, although i heard the tall white Greys are not as harmful, but i don't know for sure...The tall greys are still not considered high vibrational though...
I'm Chris Kyle
A tidaly locked planet should be less then 0.70. Not fricking 0.95.
Tidaly locked doesnt make it impossible life can still exist in the terminator zone
Where its just forever sunset or twilight and the temp is just right
And the radiation is lower there
So life is less likely but not impossible.
Nice video. My only gripe is that red dwarf stars aren't actually red. They shine with a whitish light, similar to that of a filament light bulb.
*PLAYING on their minds
We should be looking at stars that are very similar or exactly like our own. This would then likely mean that its habitable zone would be close to what our own is and if there is a planet there it would be likely that is very similar to Earth as well. Looking at red dwarfs will ultimately get us nowhere because any planet orbiting in its habitable zone is bound to be tidally locked and its orbital period only lasting a couple of days which is very likely not going to be able to support human life. We need that 365 days orbital cycle to function properly due to our biological rhythm and also we depend on oxygen. Some recent studies show that oxygen production depends on slow day/night cycle that Earth has. Plus the planet has to have almost exact axial rotation as our own (about 24 hours) and likely also a big enough moon to promote tides (tides are important for ocean life cycle and currents). So looking at planets that have far less than that is pointless because first of all, oxygen production would likely not be good enough to sustain us, if that planet could contain oxygen atmosphere at all due to close proximity to its star. Bottom line, we should be looking to first of all find G type main sequence stars that have similar or exact temperature as our own, and only then look at its planets. Stop wasting time on these small stars that are clearly not good enough to sustain us. We found thousands of planets so far, but none seem to have panned out as a potential ''next earth'', because we are looking in the wrong places. Now im no expert by any means but this is what i found by reading various papers on the topic
The problem at finding a star that is similar or exactly like our own is the collapsing gas cloud would have to have almost exactly the same make-up as the cloud that made our sun and would also need to almost exactly the same mass as well , so far we've discovered more than two thousand exo-solar systems and ours seems to be the odd one out...
there is tau ceti 10 ly away it should be like earth it has one planet at the right distance
struckture the galaxcy 1st then ACCESSSORIES = PLANET / STAR / BLA2 Paham tak??????? when we done struckture the [ROUTE / MAPING GALAXCY / BASE ON THE HOW BIG IS THE ROUTE TO CIRCLE THE SUN / MOOON / DEPENDS / IF LOCATIONS IS TO HUGE THEN 2 SUN/MOON . SIMPLE DOL!!!!
STRUCKTURE 1ST C THE ROUTE OF MAPING DO NOT MAKE THEM CIRCLE THE WHOLE UNIVERSE MAKEIT THE ROUTE SMALLER / ARRANGE THE GALLAXCY /
NOT DIFICULT RITE MY INSTRUCTIONS TEAM ? SIMPLE RITE
If we were only looking for life such as we have on earth of course. Even on earth we have many examples of extremophiles that tolerate extreme pressures, extremely high/low Ph, temperatures that we certainly cannot, radiation, etc.
It shouldn't be much of a stretch to think that things elsewhere formed to tolerate extremes in ways that we cannot imagine.
@@justme-ij2qy seriously i really hate this kind of energy ... greeedy/money/power/selfish/ego/etc just wanna away from this type of spesiss
Thank you, I hadn't heard of this exoplanet !👍
Human curiosity never ends, they think about to colonizing (invade) a foreign planet…😁
I would not exclude Teegarden c yet, though.
An Earth-like planet has active volcanoes pumping up a lot of CO2 into the atmosphere; the volcanoes do not care about the amount of energy that the planet gets from its star and its surface temperature. Now, iIf the planet is covered in ice, then there is little if any evaporation. Thus, no rains. CO2 is not removed from the atmosphere and piles up, producing a powerful greenhouse effect that eventually thaws the icy surface.
Once an ocean is formed, rains begin and start removing CO2 from the atmosphere, stabilising the CO2 levels and the temperature around 10-20 C.
There is some strong indication that Earth itself went through "Ice-ball" phases, when it was covered in ice and glaciers down to the equator. However, Earth volcanoes thawed it.
I am more worried about the possibility that UV flux and stellar wind - both of which are particularly strong around a red dwarf - may have eroded the atmosphere. Teegarden's star is not a very "active" red dwarf; but what it produces might already be enough to slowly strip both Teegarden B and C from their atmospheres over geological eras.
This is what you get if you orbit a star that close...
Hell yeah we love em!
Try Proxima Centauri B.
The star is too dim for viable life-bearing planets.
I believe that from a terraformation standpoint, rather than looking to run and colonize an already perfect planet, a cold earth like Teegarden C is more ideal for being harnessed on a higher technological level. What I'm looking at is whether a planet has enough gravity for us to walk on the surface, no life so that we could develop it without any ethical concerns, and stable enough that it could get turned into a movable planet with huge propulsion systems and taken out of the original system entirely. A planet like Venus is actually perfect for terraformation also, but rather than trying to make a miracle atmosphere like our own, which is fragile, I think we need to look at covering a planet with a diamond glass geodesic dome all the way around. Actually multiple layers. That way, we could customize the atmosphere within far quicker, almost as soon as the dome is constructed, and the conditions inside the dome could be kept warm even in deep space all the way away from a star. What is extraordinary about a planet like Teegarden B is that its possibly teeming with life, who knows what type of plants exist there but we could be looking at new sources of plant based food and beneficial atmospheric regulators like trees even when these planets don't have any creatures like humans upon them. The ideal in my eyes is taking beneficial life forms to one of those hot or cold earth's without any life, but a sturdier crust, building up an exocrust for strength and stability, building a geodesic dome to contain an atmosphere and protect from impacts, and then collecting those types of hot or cold earth's together into a new type of galactic hyperstructure made only of planets and no stars. The planets could be made to orbit inside of a hyperdome the size of a dwarf system with a central heating element, space elevators connecting all the planets and the ability to move the entire system to keep looking for more planets to add. This system right here is exciting because the first step towards that could get taken quite close to us, even if it means we find a cold, lifeless earth sized rock with nothing but ice on it. That type of rock has to get the miners and engineers in us all excited because we would have far more longevity and safety on such a planet than the wild one that we come from, where everything suits us temporarily but is so subject to change. I think that all in all, when you look at planets through the lens of terraformation, an earth like planet such as Teegarden C is more cut out for us as masters of technology and space mining than one lile Teegarden B, which is probably wild like earth and more dangerous, less movable, and could even come with a hostile humanoid like species who wouldn't want us messing with their home. The uninhabited earth's are the real treasures in my eyes, amazing to think how many systems have ones that aren't gonna be looked at as lucrative by the thinkers of yesteryear despite untold heaping mountains of precious metals and such waiting to be harnessed... it's an exciting time to be into astronomy
Interesting and educational exoplanet lecture.
Just know that " Life comes from Life!!!".
if we actually detected life somewhere that would mean that the whole universe is teaming with life
Interstellar was a good movie. Watching this made me think of that a couple times.
So interesting 🤔
Even though the planet is out of the habitable zone, life could still be supported close to the ocean floor, as the life would be warm by the planets core.
5:41 Hoth..
When you're so excited that you like the video as soon as it starts lol
Incrível Simplesmente Espetacular..
These videos are so useful for first graders.
I'm very amazed to see more information about exoplanets the universe has so many secrets about exoplanets and I can't wait for you guys so show more
Funny how we talk about finding micro-organisms on Earth-like planets but not fully developed intelligent species as if every planet is by standard a host for lower life forms than ours.
Yes when its actually the other way around, we are seen as a low intelligence barbaric species planet by civilisations out there.
Only about 465.000 human years away
Ye
"Ever since people found out there are other worlds out there, this question has been preying on their minds: Are these worlds suitable for life? Do aliens really exist? Have they heard the Good News about Jesus Christ yet? If not, how soon can we go there to convert them?"
Earthlings are gonna be the intergalactic jahoves witness haha
While I think this is fascinating and I wish we had the technology to go see these planets and explore them ourselves, I can’t help but wonder… How do they know the compositions of these exoplanets? They can’t see them except as a wobble in the light from their host star or perhaps a spot in front of the star. So how do scientists know it’s a rocky planet with a solid core, a mantle and a thin crust like Earth? How do they determine the temperature and off and what type of atmosphere these planets have? Yeah, they use mathematical processes to determine temperature, but I’d like to know the exact process and how they came up with it. I mean… is this something we can put even a little faith in or are these scientists just pulling these equations out their butts and saying, “Yeah, that sounds pretty good”? Maybe you could do a video explaining the process a bit more so we know that we may not be alone in our galaxy and that these scientists aren’t just pulling these things out of nowhere to make us feel better and give us false hope.
Look up spectral analysis. They split the light reflected from these worlds into it's spectral components, from which it is possible to determine the composition of their atmospheres. Additionally, the size of the planets, and weather patterns can be determined from their orbital speed, distance from the stars which they orbit, and the amount of radiation / energy emanated by the stars which they orbit. Literally all these different mentioned aspects of the planets can be calculated simply by analysing their images which are captured by the telescopes. No scientist ever "pulls equations out of their butts"; they literally wouldn't be scientists if they did that, as by definition, science without clear evidence and understanding of relevant facts, isn't science at all
To gain all of this information, all you need is a powerful telescope like the one which they used, and the relevant knowledge. A 2nd year college student (in some cases, even AP Physics high school students) can perform all these calculations and evaluations with ease
@@guyfawkes6428 yup you got it right and they compare other planets spectral analysis to ours like say a genetic code to see how similar or different they are
if life does actually exist there, they,ll probably evolve to be very sensitive to bright light.
skip to 6:45 to see what you clicked on this video for.
This is why it amazes me that a lot of people don’t believe in life out there
As long as they can’t get from there to here, and more importantly we can’t get from here to there, I have no problem with habitable worlds.
@Nemisis >:) u guys u know me welll i love u dear as usual 1st layer .... blue where is it?? not yet arrive
The first thing is you discover how to accomplish super luminal speed! Even if tomorrow we find a dead ringer to earth, if it is a half of a light year ! We can’t get there!
human raise will be long time gone by the time anybody reach that planet,,,i like the way the narrator said the distance "is just"12 and a half light yrs away ,,,,,"just "😂,,,,,what he he should be sayin is the distance is unreachable by any human. and thats the truth
12.5 light years isn’t really close to us
yes
More Earth-like than Kepler 452-B?
Maybe The Exo Planet named Teegarden B may very have a City on it called Boston B?
If we can’t rule out life on a planet 12 light years away I’m not sure how life on Venus is “totally out of the question”. Venus has atmospheric anomalies that remain unexplained but suggest life is possible.
Venus has absolutely no water though.
can check on history to c what inhabit there & how they destroy everthing
there are other solvents where life can evolve exept water
Wonderful!
What is the outro song ?
I wonder if "most" humans think when we look for other exoplanets or planets suitable for life....that we are looking at that them for our potential future move. not thinking for a second that there may be someone already there.
Couldn't even get a pic of Pluto till we flew past it. This is silly to think we know any of this light years away.
Take an astronomy class sometime.
@@BingBingBongBong ok bud, simple reply. Do you even understand how they discover these planets? They can't even see them. They see light dimming from stars and base conclusions from that.
Maybe study up on that and reply
Super!!!
Awesome 😎
It's Eternia! By the Power of Grayskull!!
A red stat? Sounds like Krypton to me.
I no not freaken tidally locked or almost the size the Neptune.
What if teegarden c has a dense atmosphere of methane ,carbon dioxide oxygen and nitrogen?
In the words of Dorothy
No place like home
Why do scientists keep looking for and earth like planet around a non sun like star ?
@@TheDredConspiracy thank you
Is there teegarden A? Also what a beautiful naming of a mysterious world. Thank you kindly - Dear friend @Kosmo u 🚀🆙 & on
Teegarden A is the star
Good video
But there are life on Venus... Microbiologic life form in the gas clouds, but life.
Need to create a warp speed drive otherwise we can't explore space properly, if we can't get to planets similar to earth whats the point in all this.
You know the narrator is beyond optimistic when he explains the planet is "only" 12 light years away. Consider that our Solar System is "only" .00127 as measured in light years. Unless we develop a propulsion system that works not only in theory we might not be able to go beyond our backyard. It's an approximate 3 year ride to Europa. Hop aboard!
I think mankind will crack it eventually... the theoretical physics of faster than light space travel has already been laid out so the real challenge would be the engineering and the energy requirements.... I believe it will be possible but unfortunately won't be in our lifetime
Too bad we don’t have warp speed…I myself wouldn’t mind going to plaid.
Give it 4000 years, she'll be right.
Trillions of exoplanets and still, no one is there.
Yes, try to come up with something of Your idea only, ...........so to be parrotless .
Why planet like Mars has thin atmosphere than that of moons like Enceledous, europa, Titans??
These worlds have low gravity but are very cold; so their atmospheres are not evaporated by the Sun's radiation.
If you really want to trip, at home of course, sync this video at 2min 30 to the start of the song "Blinded By The Light". Not detracting from THE finest video produced by Kosmo, just, magical how it all times perfectly to that one song, try it. It is amazing the synchronicity. Thanks, glad you are back to the videos and hopefully feeling better. Much to all. D.
This is like a 3 year old discovery
Yeah I am always confused about whether these discoveries are really "new".
If we could even develop an engine that can travel 99% the speed of light we could send probes in our lifetime to a bunch of exoplanets and maybe even astronauts down the road
when you go really fast, interstellar travel is difficult because even the smallest particle of space dust will cause massive damage
@@HunterOneMillion I saw a few videos about plasma shields which would protect the spacecraft from dust particles and they were able to implement them I think reaching that speed is what our biggest issue is at the moment
BleedGreenNation ... The Americans have been travelling in space since at least 2003, They currently seem to have three star ships that cost trillions of dollars. They are operated by the military and are as follows "The USS Curtis LeMay" "The USS Hoyt Vandenberg" and "The USS Roscoe Hillenkoetter" they are crewed by a joint human alien crew (two different types of ET). The tech that is used to operate them is ET tech, that's why it is a joint adventure. The craft have human crew personnel from several countries besides the US.
@@BleedGreenNation Well if you're actually going 99% the speed of light, you only really need to shield the very front of your ship. But if your going say 20%, which is much more doable, then you would need to encapsulate the entire thing in thick armour.
Also time would be dilated
So the trip would seem shorter to you.
not even 1 photo?
Any well reasoned exoplanet information welcomed
Hey Kosmo,
A beautiful video and very well narrated, but I confess it greatly troubles me! Primarily because all of this talk of exoplanets and “super Earths” tend to create a false sense of “other options” in the minds of so many people (and especially among those who “don’t need no education…”. “We don’t have to save the Earth, we’ll all just go live on an exoplanet!”
No you won’t! 7+ billion people? Even if Mars could be “terraformed” (which it can’t, by the way… Elon Musk is an idiot, jus’ sayin’), the bare logistics of transporting even a few thousand people there is almost incomprehensible! And to spend six months cooped up in, say, the “Starship” (Why do we let that character get away with calling it that? It’s barely a “low Earth orbit”ship!), to spend the rest of their short lives in a quonset hut the size of a convenience store? I guarantee someone is going to open the port halfway there!
Since I’m on that subject, the only way Mars will be made habitable for humanity is to send humanoid and super-humanoid robots ahead in waves, to then construct underground cities to protect us from radiation and to allow a sufficiently large environment for humans to thrive. Not Elon’s Buck Rogers nonsense (about as well considered as the T-Rump’s ridiculous “Space Force”)!
And planet “b,” as illustrated, seriously looks like Hell! Tidally locked? Red dwarf star? You can cancel MY timeshare right now, tell you what!
Finally, until we manage to create (or reverse engineer… kudos out to Bob Lazar!) a WARP DRIVE (probably possible, but a lot less eminent than nuclear fusion), we’re not going ANYWHERE anytime SOON! Sorry if I’m popping anyone’s bubble, but these are the factors we have to consider. I know many people have a very “cowboys in space / Star Wars” vision of all this (and by the way, the Millennium Falcon doesn’t go “whoosh” in space, my science challenged friends… if Stanley Kubrick was in space we couldn’t hear HIM scream either, though I’m pretty sure he’d want to!)…
So maybe we should have another look at trying to save THIS planet, ya think?
Still, a beautiful, well produced, and visually compelling program! I do look forward to your future undertakings, though I’d hope you might focus more on things like, say, saving THIS planet?
With infinite love and gratitude, your friend…
-Glenn C. B. Jones
Maybe saving the planet and colonizing space aren't mutually exclusive goals.
@@AlexOfTheCastle Down with that, Alex! I'll see you that and raise you,,,
Could the space faring nations of the planet (and the almost ALL are now!) perhaps band together to create a "line of defense," with operational capacities, in the NOT ALL THAT UNLIKELY EVENT that another ''''bunch of gravel' from the Taurid Meteor "Shower" may elect to visit another round of "hellfire and damnation" upon the Earth, as it did at the Younger-Dryas event, around 13,000 years ago, extinguishing the extremely advanced civilization that was formerly extant here (unlimited remote power?... anti-gravity?)? If you are curious about this, check out Ben at "Uncharted X" on YT, who I find to be the most scientific and science referencing on the subject, though Graham Hancock and Brien Foerster also "bring the pain" quite believably! If, however, you can believe that Egypt, a civilization lacking both trees and wheels, with slaves pulling train car sized blocks on SAND with wooden ROLLERS (they could figure out "rollers," but, slap forehead, the WHEEL totally escaped them!), in 20 YEARS, you may be beyond hope! And these childhood fictions are still being ACTIVELY propagated! Just the other night I saw this site boldly putting forth this drivel, and even indicating (with, I will say beautiful footage!) which Pharaohs were buried in which pyramids! As NO mummies have EVER been discovered in ANY pyramid, so I'm calling this active nescient disinformation!
The late, great Gene Shoemaker (he of, you might recall, the Shoemaker-Levy Comet, which humanity was privileged to PHOTOGRAPH crashing into Jupiter, any chunk of which would likely have extinguished ALL life on Earth, not just we dinosaurs!) said, in words to the effect of "And the one that gets us we probably won't even see coming!"
As the wonderful Planetary Society (planetary.org) has said, and emblazoned on posters, mugs and T-shirts, "Stay Unextinct!"
Love to Alex and all...
-- Glenn C. B. Jones
3rd Planet Out
(seriously!)
PS: How, my friends, do you manage to keep it so BRIEF?
Eyeball planets are not Earth analogs. The truth is we have not found a planet like the Earth anywhere in the Galaxy yet.
We have
We know one and its earth
@@maryann2628 there are more
why do we see a yellow sun when doing space pictures/ videos ?
Except if it doesn’t have a moon it will be gravitationally locked and hence unliveable.
DIBS!
I wanna go to Pink Earth. That's cute.
To find earth like planets do they look for stars like ours?
Yes. If we want to find life-bearing planets we need to study stars of around the same brightness and age as the Sun.
Well actually I believe what we should look for is the least earth like planet .
Because everything on each could be completely different for say aliens .
Born different places for one so where we can't breathe maby they can where we can't go they could live.