16:25 "the barrels can be changed so they are not identifiable". Ms. Katz's theory here is that a bullet fired from a weapon and recovered from a crime scene can be used to identify a weapon by the striations left on the bullet. Yeah. Sometimes. Sometimes not. That assumes that the weapon can be recovered separate from the crime scene, tied to a perpetrator, who is tied to the shooting. It's a stretch.
Mark, as an attorney, I would hope you would be open to the counterargument regarding the statements the DA made in this conversation. The DA made several statements that were factually inaccurate and, in some cases, just falsehoods. The idea that a homemade firearm is any more traceable than a store bought firearm is just incorrect given the systems we have in place today. It would also appear that the DA is overriding our 4th Amendment rights with her policies. Having an strong counterpoint discussion would clarify the opposing views to the inaccuracies made by the DA.
@@marcbeckmananyone with half a brain that know most criminals damage or remove serial numbers from firearms, manufactured by federally license manufacturers making them just as untraceable as any “ghost gun”.
Can I make a suggestion. There are actually people out there that know a lot about guns. You could talk to them and learn what you want to know. Instead of talking to a pair of fools.
you say the majority is just people who are non violent people who like 3d printing and you want to ruin their lives for nothing... that certainly sounds like the moral high ground...
If you don't have rounds, you can't practice. Do we really want gun owners to be reckless? Of course not. People should have as many rounds on hand as it takes to be proficient.
13:28 "you can buy pieces of guns on the Internet". True. You can also buy them from a gun store, because they aren't "guns". They're just gun parts, perfectly legal to buy and sell. The actual gun itself is the frame or receiver which, if purchased, must have a serial number.
12:16 "not a single prosecution for legally obtained guns". What about Dexter Taylor? He made his own guns (which is a legal, Constitutionally protected method of obtaining a gun) and is now spending 10 years in jail. There is no victim. He hurt no one.
This was wildly difficult for me to watch given how inaccurate it was. The statement about the firearms being undetectable was laughable because the barrels and bullets are metal. But my first concern is that she seems interested in history - but then fails to realize most firearms were designed so that starving and illiterate Russian peasants could assemble, operate, and maintain them. If you can do a 100 piece jigsaw puzzle, you can figure out how to assemble a three piece firearm. I am offended that she says "your son or your daughter... is dangerous". Why would the police automatically assume people are dangerous? Why my children? Is the assumption that law abiding people are guilty? Is that why so many people are shot by her police? Is the emphasis of violence placed onto police causing more problems than half the american population she admits owns firearms? I also find it hilarious she mentions narcotics. Drugs won the war on drugs - why would it be any different this time?
14:44 "and the laws have not caught up with it" (buying a full set of parts). Yes, Ms. Katz, why do you need laws to stop something which is perfectly legal? The Constitution doesn't give you the power to write a law which prevents people from acquiring replacement parts for a firearm (unless they're a prohibited person, of course).
14:29 "to try to not get caught". Sorry, Ms Katz, but buying spare parts for a gun you legally own is perfectly legal. Nobody is trying "not to get caught". Is it easier to buy a full kit of replacement parts? Sure, just like it's easier to buy a kit of parts for ANYTHING where you might need some or all of the parts.
12:49 "bringing them up the iron pipelines"? The only iron pipeline I know of is Amtrak's NorthEast Corridor, and guns are not legal on any Amtrak train.
13:46 "you go onto the Internet and you can buy a piece of plastic gun" (the frame)." Uh, no you can't. Anybody selling such a piece of plastic is selling a gun. Doesn't matter if you need to add parts to it or not. It's a gun. Everybody agrees with this: ATF, NY, and every gun nut out there. And it's completely illegal. So the fact that you can get parts for such a gun doesn't matter. Everybody buys parts for their guns, because like any other machine, parts wear out. Or when you're cleaning your gun, you lose a part. Perfectly legal to buy new parts. Perfectly illegal to buy the gun itself. (Of course, you can 3D print a frame, which is nominally what this discussion is about, so why is she talking about people illegally buying frames when you can legally print one yourself?)
Interestingly, it's perfectly legal to create your own gun, whether using a machine shop or a 3D printer (for the frame -- other parts are simply spare parts). Unless you plan to sell the gun, it doesn't have to have a serial number on it. Do criminal states like NY insist otherwise, contra the Constitution's restrictions on them? Yes, yes, they do.
So over the course of the last year you have a 1000% increase in recovered 3d printed guns but you admit you didn't track it 2 to 3 years ago... But the last 12 months have been amazingly bad. That's all you need to prove an increasing trend? Not only am I dumber for having watched this propaganda, I am also forced to try to track the nonsense statistics and Idiocracy level lexicon used by the participants just so I can debunk future propaganda. Can a fully plastic gun be made right now... No. You still need metal parts, none of which are iron. And what are guns without their metal bullets??? Nothing. Perhaps the host should stick to lifestyle interviews about growing up at sleepaway camp.
I watched this, and now i feel dumber worry about the stupid ass laws that allow violent offenders to walk free after getting caught multiple times
Privately designed firearms. So scary!
16:25 "the barrels can be changed so they are not identifiable". Ms. Katz's theory here is that a bullet fired from a weapon and recovered from a crime scene can be used to identify a weapon by the striations left on the bullet. Yeah. Sometimes. Sometimes not. That assumes that the weapon can be recovered separate from the crime scene, tied to a perpetrator, who is tied to the shooting. It's a stretch.
Mark, as an attorney, I would hope you would be open to the counterargument regarding the statements the DA made in this conversation.
The DA made several statements that were factually inaccurate and, in some cases, just falsehoods.
The idea that a homemade firearm is any more traceable than a store bought firearm is just incorrect given the systems we have in place today.
It would also appear that the DA is overriding our 4th Amendment rights with her policies.
Having an strong counterpoint discussion would clarify the opposing views to the inaccuracies made by the DA.
I certainly welcome the counter-argument. Who would you suggest I invite to the show to do so?
@@marcbeckmananyone with half a brain that know most criminals damage or remove serial numbers from firearms, manufactured by federally license manufacturers making them just as untraceable as any “ghost gun”.
@@marcbeckmanColion Noir is a lawyer I believe. He could certainly add a good perspective.
@@mordredthehero www.breitbart.com/2nd-amendment/2024/05/29/d-a-indicates-39-percent-untraceable-ghost-guns-traced-queens/
@@mordredthehero Noted, thank you. Will research.
It's sad that none of the information here was researched or fact checked. Lady said some absolute nonsense
guns are good and people should print more guns
The amount of absolute ignorance put forward in this interview is mind blowing
Can I make a suggestion. There are actually people out there that know a lot about guns. You could talk to them and learn what you want to know. Instead of talking to a pair of fools.
you say the majority is just people who are non violent people who like 3d printing and you want to ruin their lives for nothing... that certainly sounds like the moral high ground...
5k rounds is nothing and ooo wow people dont like to make their ears ring.
If you don't have rounds, you can't practice. Do we really want gun owners to be reckless? Of course not. People should have as many rounds on hand as it takes to be proficient.
you can 3d print machine guns and sell them to random people??? wow how cool
wow time to get a 3d printer good to know
tar and feathers
you are not welcome
13:28 "you can buy pieces of guns on the Internet". True. You can also buy them from a gun store, because they aren't "guns". They're just gun parts, perfectly legal to buy and sell. The actual gun itself is the frame or receiver which, if purchased, must have a serial number.
12:16 "not a single prosecution for legally obtained guns". What about Dexter Taylor? He made his own guns (which is a legal, Constitutionally protected method of obtaining a gun) and is now spending 10 years in jail. There is no victim. He hurt no one.
This was wildly difficult for me to watch given how inaccurate it was. The statement about the firearms being undetectable was laughable because the barrels and bullets are metal. But my first concern is that she seems interested in history - but then fails to realize most firearms were designed so that starving and illiterate Russian peasants could assemble, operate, and maintain them. If you can do a 100 piece jigsaw puzzle, you can figure out how to assemble a three piece firearm.
I am offended that she says "your son or your daughter... is dangerous". Why would the police automatically assume people are dangerous? Why my children? Is the assumption that law abiding people are guilty? Is that why so many people are shot by her police? Is the emphasis of violence placed onto police causing more problems than half the american population she admits owns firearms?
I also find it hilarious she mentions narcotics. Drugs won the war on drugs - why would it be any different this time?
Why would anybody admit to owning a gun given today's firearm politics? That statistic is not reliable.
absolute red coats.
14:44 "and the laws have not caught up with it" (buying a full set of parts). Yes, Ms. Katz, why do you need laws to stop something which is perfectly legal? The Constitution doesn't give you the power to write a law which prevents people from acquiring replacement parts for a firearm (unless they're a prohibited person, of course).
14:29 "to try to not get caught". Sorry, Ms Katz, but buying spare parts for a gun you legally own is perfectly legal. Nobody is trying "not to get caught". Is it easier to buy a full kit of replacement parts? Sure, just like it's easier to buy a kit of parts for ANYTHING where you might need some or all of the parts.
This DA know very little about firearms and or 3d printings. Thank for the laugh.
12:49 "bringing them up the iron pipelines"? The only iron pipeline I know of is Amtrak's NorthEast Corridor, and guns are not legal on any Amtrak train.
13:46 "you go onto the Internet and you can buy a piece of plastic gun" (the frame)." Uh, no you can't. Anybody selling such a piece of plastic is selling a gun. Doesn't matter if you need to add parts to it or not. It's a gun. Everybody agrees with this: ATF, NY, and every gun nut out there. And it's completely illegal. So the fact that you can get parts for such a gun doesn't matter. Everybody buys parts for their guns, because like any other machine, parts wear out. Or when you're cleaning your gun, you lose a part. Perfectly legal to buy new parts. Perfectly illegal to buy the gun itself.
(Of course, you can 3D print a frame, which is nominally what this discussion is about, so why is she talking about people illegally buying frames when you can legally print one yourself?)
Interestingly, it's perfectly legal to create your own gun, whether using a machine shop or a 3D printer (for the frame -- other parts are simply spare parts). Unless you plan to sell the gun, it doesn't have to have a serial number on it. Do criminal states like NY insist otherwise, contra the Constitution's restrictions on them? Yes, yes, they do.
yea bud you're really confused you got that right
🤣
Damn you beat me to it. 🤣
So over the course of the last year you have a 1000% increase in recovered 3d printed guns but you admit you didn't track it 2 to 3 years ago... But the last 12 months have been amazingly bad. That's all you need to prove an increasing trend?
Not only am I dumber for having watched this propaganda, I am also forced to try to track the nonsense statistics and Idiocracy level lexicon used by the participants just so I can debunk future propaganda. Can a fully plastic gun be made right now... No. You still need metal parts, none of which are iron. And what are guns without their metal bullets??? Nothing.
Perhaps the host should stick to lifestyle interviews about growing up at sleepaway camp.