The Roman Lucretius' ON THE NATURE OF THINGS is a poem that explains Epicurean philosophy, written during the first century before Christ, during Julius Caesar's life and the Republic's end times.
Thanks for the video!! I'm studying it to do a PHD selection here in Brazil, and you made some great points that have helped me to understand it better!!
And oh my goodness! You're studying Heidegger in seminary!?!?! That's fun. If this is more than a one-time reading in one course, I strongly recommend Jean-Luc Marion. His book _God Without Being_ borrows from Heidegger for theology purposes.
🙏. So he chooses once again as in Being and Time to oppose science in the name of mysticism and irrationalism. He evades these labels by invoking poetry and who doesn’t like poetry?
Old science is a part process that had been reversed by the categories perceiving things as they are unknowable possibly a probability in the mind through the senses with language and the act that's the real at any point of view or not but is specific to his present sense terms as the significant relay of the mind and theory on knowledge he attacks old science as an ontology in the mind of a singular perception that reveals itself through desiring thought and knowledge through changeable concepts categories reverse to process an ontology that's deconstructive
He doesn’t oppose science or technology he’s saying that technology is a dispensation of Being, that is, of presencing. beings come to presence technologically and after this we the human beings correspond to this by creating modern technological appliances and apparatuses, by ‘this’ I mean Being whose current dispensation occurs as technology, which for Heidegger is the culmination of Western metaphysics.
Really appreciate guys who can penetrate the difficulty of the idea.
The Roman Lucretius' ON THE NATURE OF THINGS is a poem that explains Epicurean philosophy, written during the first century before Christ, during Julius Caesar's life and the Republic's end times.
Very straightforward and interesting analysis. Thank you for sharing!
Thanks for the video!! I'm studying it to do a PHD selection here in Brazil, and you made some great points that have helped me to understand it better!!
This helped me a lot with my seminary work. Thanks
Glad to hear it!
And oh my goodness! You're studying Heidegger in seminary!?!?! That's fun.
If this is more than a one-time reading in one course, I strongly recommend Jean-Luc Marion. His book _God Without Being_ borrows from Heidegger for theology purposes.
This is nice to begin with Letter on Humanism. Thanks
Great video!
🙏. So he chooses once again as in Being and Time to oppose science in the name of mysticism and irrationalism. He evades these labels by invoking poetry and who doesn’t like poetry?
More likely he's just opposing scientISM. But this is Heidegger, and I can't pretend fo understand all that much!
Old science is a part process that had been reversed by the categories perceiving things as they are unknowable possibly a probability in the mind through the senses with language and the act that's the real at any point of view or not but is specific to his present sense terms as the significant relay of the mind and theory on knowledge he attacks old science as an ontology in the mind of a singular perception that reveals itself through desiring thought and knowledge through changeable concepts categories reverse to process an ontology that's deconstructive
He doesn’t oppose science or technology he’s saying that technology is a dispensation of Being, that is, of presencing. beings come to presence technologically and after this we the human beings correspond to this by creating modern technological appliances and apparatuses, by ‘this’ I mean Being whose current dispensation occurs as technology, which for Heidegger is the culmination of Western metaphysics.