There are two major editing errors to watch out for in this video: 이 영상에는 두 개의 편집 오류가 있습니다: 1. The population of the city circa 500 should be closer to 30,000. I generated the number files wrong. 500년경의 인구는 약 30,000이어야 합니다. 숫자 파일을 잘못 생성했습니다. 2. Towards the end, the Ile de Saint-Louis and a part of the Right Bank blink between green and navy. They should be navy. 영상 끝부분에 생루이섬과 우안 일부의 색이 녹색과 남색 사이를 오가는데, 남색이 맞습니다.
I wish this showed the growth of the urban area and not just the districts of Paris... 80% of Paris's population and urban area is outside of the districts.
Sure, to reduce Paris to only the tiny "intra-muros" part is a complete nonsense 🙄 Nowadays, the Paris metropolitan population is 13M (counting 40% commuters) and 15M (counting 25% commuters), this only makes sense for comparing this city to other cities in Europe and around the world.
What you call the districts of Paris is in fact the City of Paris. Those who live out of it can't be counted. They are not Parisians. And as a non Parisian I'm perfectly fine with that. 😉
@@NikO0oooo I disagree. There are big differences between Paris and the banlieues. This is not the same cost of living, the same architecture, the same values etc. There are of course differences between the banlieues and between the Parisians discrits but this is not only a question of administration. I am telling you, if you ask a Parisian (like me) he will disagree.
@@NikO0oooo I have no clue and don't really give a shit about a lot of French things but this argument on if the areas that aren't officially districts, but people commuting in and not being considered part of the city is one of the most stupid arguments ever. They clearly are, even if they have their own distinct cultures. Just look at NYC if you don't believe so. (Just wanted to show you some support on this bike. Have a good day man.)
It makes sense. Islands are quite defendable, you need water for everything, and fishing can supplement the food supply. Plus it can be quite picturesque before urbanization.
And this region of France, which includes Paris at its center is called: Île-de-France (The Island of France). We, the inhabitants of the Île-de-France, we are called the Franciliens (men) / Franciliennes (women). It's a contraction of France and îlien / îlienne. I'm not sure for the translation of the french word "îlien / îlienne". It refers to a person who lives on an island (may be : islander) fun fact : On this island, in front of Notre-Dame, you can find on the ground a stone named : "point zéro des routes de france" (zero point of roads in France). it is used as a reference for calculating distances with other cities in France.
Une ville remplie de junkie et de clodos (j’ai de la peine pour eux quand même). Paris est absolument magnifique et je peux comprendre qu’elle soit notre capitale, c’est juste dommage qu’elle soit remplie de Parisiens.
I'm really happy more and more people are doing city growth videos! I feel like that's something that has been missing from youtube for the longest time
As a Frenchman I can say that Paris is beautiful architecturally and its history is fascinating. It’s such a shame that it’s filled with Parisians though.
Apres t'as tout sauf des parisiens à Paris. C'est la plaque tournante de la France. Faites l'expérience de demander d'où vienne les gens à Paris, vous remarquerez que sans travail, Paris c'est même pas 200 000 habitants
Alas this video is really wrong... Lutecia was not the Île de la Cité but a past island located currently in Nanterre. Then you cannot had 70 000 people living in this island. Because the island is 0.2 km2 and only 900 people are actually living there. Except if during roman empire, people lived in skycreepers.
Every page I've learnt more and more things about Paris when I read the Notre Dame de Paris. And the more I knew the more I loved. What an incredible history!
Interesting history, thanks for video! Love France from Ukraine! We started our diplomatic Ukrainian-French relations since 838 and also, when the Ukrainian duchess and French queen Anna Yaroslavna (Anna de Kyїv) (1024-1075) came to Paris.
I admit I'm a little surprised the Romans never reestablished the mainland portion of the city just because of Frankish raids into interior Gaul in the third century. Sometimes they did stuff that makes me wonder if they knew the end was coming.
Wow Paris under thr Romans had 80.000 people. After the Romans the population dropped so much that it took almost 1000 years to get back to the same number
It´s a nice video (altough it just shows the political growth of Paris). But it should be slower; it is hard to follow all the information on normal speed.
Wow i didn't know Paris has only 2 million people, it's almost the same population as my city, Perth, but i doubt anyone has heard of Perth compared to Paris!
Well, Paris is the city proper, wich is just the center of the actual urban area. The actual urban area is about 12-13 M inhabitants. You may experience the same problem of definitions with London. There are : - The City - Inner London - Greater London
I love how the non-christians got lazy and named the BC era BCE even though its still the same year Jesus was born (most historians argue He was a real historical figure), instead of an "acutally important" event like the discovery of farming or any metal age
It is much more likely that the Parisii were based in Nanterre. Excavations have shown a large settlement there, whereas no traces have been found on the Cité island. It is probable that Julius Caesar lied to present a people easy to convert to the senate.
Something wrong between the early Roman era and about 600AD where the Roman districts disappear from the map and only reappear after that. Seems like an significant error or am I missing some historical reality?
I believe there is a mistake. Paris wasn't at its origin on the island in the Seiner but more around the city of Nanterre a bit further west and it's the Romans who moved Lutecia (Paris) to where it is now.
Indeed, historians don't know for sure : - Old, traditionnal historiography highlight the island of the Cité as the gaulish site. - Important celtic archeological finds have been discovered in Nanterre (mostly burial sites), as opposed to Paris. But... - Paris having been continuously inhabited since +- 1 CE, ancient archeological sites may realistically have been destroyed among the centuries of constant building - destroying - rebuilding... The absence of very ancient archeological finds doesn't prove much in this context. - The toponymy of Nanterre is itself a problem since it's name is gaulish (Nemetoduro = the sanctuary's gate) and is NOT Lucotetia, the known gaulish name of the main Parisi oppidum. - The description written in 'de bello gallico' are nearly useless, for 1) C. J. Caesar wasn't present himself in the campaign against Parisis (it was Labienus), thus his written account is at best second hand. 2) Islands often changed, appeared, disappeared in a matter of months in such flat plain river such as the Seine. 3) A tight meander may have been confused as an island by Labienus observations. - There are other archeological hypothesis such as St Maur des fossés. Note that gaulish tribes often had very often more than one oppidum (helvetii for instance had a dozen oppida), commonly one for religious purpose (maybe Nanterre in this case), one for defense, one for trade.
@@elbentos7803 Thank you for this very interesting and detailed answer! Well, I stand corrected! Perhaps, like in the case of early Rome (800 BCE), there were simply many tribes all around the region and they simply shared common infrastructures like graveyards, etc. ? That might answer in part why there is confusion between the two?
@@amauryhervouet2459 You're welcome, and there's nothing like "correction" : gaulish civilisation is poorly known except for very recent discoveries about material life (thanks to "sauvetage" archeology) - the very important discoveries of Nanterre burial site was among them. A very good summary about gauls has been published a few years ago in an issue of dossiers de "pour la science" magazine (2008).
If i remember correctly, during the reign of Charlemagne, Aachen was his personal favorite residence but NOT the capital of the kingdom. I'm not sure if the political class was following him to his numerous castles, but i can imagine why this fact is so entrenched, it was were most of the governing was done, Paris surely lost a lot of power but it was still the capital.
@@TheDragonHistorian I think it would also be better to assume urban area = city, or at least to mention the strong difference here. During most of history, a city was the same as an urban area, only in the 20th century some purely administrative separation were created. France especially, have a really weird and arbitrary way to separate things. Today those numbers would make Paris seem like a small city until you realize there's 12/13 million people in the urban area. An astonishing difference. And those areas are, I think, part of the history of Paris. London worked the same way for a while, the big city started touching the smaller surroundering cities. The only difference is that they were administratively integrated into the bigger city afterward. Good video overall though.
3 роки тому
i visited Paris 2 years ago, really beautiful city, Is Paris or London older ?
Paris,his ancient name is Lutezia,it was a small gaul village expanded by the Roman.London,originally Londinium,is instead founded by the Roman after the conquest of the Britannia.
There are two major editing errors to watch out for in this video:
이 영상에는 두 개의 편집 오류가 있습니다:
1. The population of the city circa 500 should be closer to 30,000. I generated the number files wrong. 500년경의 인구는 약 30,000이어야 합니다. 숫자 파일을 잘못 생성했습니다.
2. Towards the end, the Ile de Saint-Louis and a part of the Right Bank blink between green and navy. They should be navy. 영상 끝부분에 생루이섬과 우안 일부의 색이 녹색과 남색 사이를 오가는데, 남색이 맞습니다.
Thank you for your excellent work!
Go history of Rome
Can you do history of Moscow?
can you do the city of rome?
bravo! (excellent work :))
I wish this showed the growth of the urban area and not just the districts of Paris... 80% of Paris's population and urban area is outside of the districts.
Sure, to reduce Paris to only the tiny "intra-muros" part is a complete nonsense 🙄
Nowadays, the Paris metropolitan population is 13M (counting 40% commuters) and 15M (counting 25% commuters), this only makes sense for comparing this city to other cities in Europe and around the world.
The Parisians would tell you that Paris is only the city of Paris. Outside it is the "banlieues".
What you call the districts of Paris is in fact the City of Paris.
Those who live out of it can't be counted. They are not Parisians.
And as a non Parisian I'm perfectly fine with that. 😉
@@NikO0oooo I disagree. There are big differences between Paris and the banlieues. This is not the same cost of living, the same architecture, the same values etc. There are of course differences between the banlieues and between the Parisians discrits but this is not only a question of administration. I am telling you, if you ask a Parisian (like me) he will disagree.
@@NikO0oooo I have no clue and don't really give a shit about a lot of French things but this argument on if the areas that aren't officially districts, but people commuting in and not being considered part of the city is one of the most stupid arguments ever.
They clearly are, even if they have their own distinct cultures. Just look at NYC if you don't believe so.
(Just wanted to show you some support on this bike. Have a good day man.)
Everyone in Paris: Dying like crazy
The music: 😃
As it should be
i love how paris started in an island
just realized this has many likes
And was shown as an island in the TV series "Vikings"!
@@errantknight-f2z yes
It makes sense. Islands are quite defendable, you need water for everything, and fishing can supplement the food supply. Plus it can be quite picturesque before urbanization.
And this region of France, which includes Paris at its center is called: Île-de-France (The Island of France). We, the inhabitants of the Île-de-France, we are called the Franciliens (men) / Franciliennes (women). It's a contraction of France and îlien / îlienne. I'm not sure for the translation of the french word "îlien / îlienne". It refers to a person who lives on an island (may be : islander)
fun fact : On this island, in front of Notre-Dame, you can find on the ground a stone named : "point zéro des routes de france" (zero point of roads in France).
it is used as a reference for calculating distances with other cities in France.
I like how they’re just chilling on that island for the first few hundred years
Didn't thought that I would see my city here ! Greetings from France !
You rich.
@@KrMorgan12 You know that there are poor parts of the city ? Go visit Pte de la Chapelle or Pte des Lilas
The Northeast is still quite poor (even though it's getting gentrified) and there is some social housing.
To be fair Paris is one of the biggest cities in europe, and its very famous worldwide as well, so its not that surprising that it was featured:D
I mean... Paris is a world capital and one of the most visited and iconic city in the world. It's not surprising.
As a frenchman i can say that Living in Paris is great!
Its just a shame that its Paris
C'est surtout dégueulasse comme ville, si t'enlèves les bâtiments historiques
Oui ville de Paris is great dans les trottoirs ya des caca partout , en plus sécurité son terrible .
Une ville remplie de junkie et de clodos (j’ai de la peine pour eux quand même). Paris est absolument magnifique et je peux comprendre qu’elle soit notre capitale, c’est juste dommage qu’elle soit remplie de Parisiens.
@@ricotaline on va pas y commencer avec les catacombes non plus MDR
@@ricotaline pas du tout c est super beau paris (bon il y a quand meme quelques endroits...)
I'm really happy more and more people are doing city growth videos! I feel like that's something that has been missing from youtube for the longest time
As a Frenchman I can say that Paris is beautiful architecturally and its history is fascinating.
It’s such a shame that it’s filled with Parisians though.
☝️😏☝️
Apres t'as tout sauf des parisiens à Paris. C'est la plaque tournante de la France.
Faites l'expérience de demander d'où vienne les gens à Paris, vous remarquerez que sans travail, Paris c'est même pas 200 000 habitants
is that a bad thing or what? I'm not from France neither Europe
@@rattled1557 you see all these clichés about France ? Most of them come from Paris.
How most of us feel about cool big cities.
I loved this timeline to the very last second! Such a simple concept yet great execution! I enjoyed every single bit of information in this clip.
I'm Parisian, and I thank you for this story of my city : D
Alas this video is really wrong... Lutecia was not the Île de la Cité but a past island located currently in Nanterre.
Then you cannot had 70 000 people living in this island. Because the island is 0.2 km2 and only 900 people are actually living there. Except if during roman empire, people lived in skycreepers.
@@legrasrobin9802 This is true
@@legrasrobin9802 the video only shows districts
De quelle arrondissement ?
@@АндрейБогуславский-б9о 14eme et toi ?
Did they make a bridge or did they just boat across the thin river all the time when it was first settled
There was bridges
And there were boats too.
I don't understand one thing, how 70 000 Parisians used to live on a small island 1:08
Please do Berlin !! We love your work ! ❤️🇩🇪
Berlin was slightly modified by russians, like most of Germany.
@@volkswagenowsky5149 You mean Prussia? No. West Germany has long history. You don't know frankish kingdom?
@@KrMorgan12 He meant Russia. Look up the cold war.
Germany empire is a rip-off
Every page I've learnt more and more things about Paris when I read the Notre Dame de Paris. And the more I knew the more I loved. What an incredible history!
Me when I see that dragon historian uploaded: A surprise to be sure, but a welcome one
The île de la cité is still one of the most fascinating places in France
Came for the history, stayed for the music
Why is the Roman Era removed from the graphics so early, when the key shows it existing until 486?
The portion initially added under Roman rule was quickly abandoned after frequent raids
The history of Amsterdam, please.
Please, do the history of Warsaw: Every year.
Interesting history, thanks for video! Love France from Ukraine! We started our diplomatic Ukrainian-French relations since 838 and also, when the Ukrainian duchess and French queen Anna Yaroslavna (Anna de Kyїv) (1024-1075) came to Paris.
Ебать она в гробу перевернулась, когда она узнала, что она была украинкой, ору
Ruthenia is not Ukraine
@@polonianova p
The population:
📉 📈
📉 📈
The Quartier Latin of today was occupied in Roman times, much beyond the Ille de la Cité. The video doesn’t show that.
Quite right! The island was the least populated part of the Roman city, whose central forum was up around the modern Luxembourg Gardens.
honestly it makes sense because it’s called quarter
Super video :).
Lovely video!
Great video!
I was wondering, do you speak French? Because I saw an astonishing amount of detail here, and I assume that came from French sources.
this channel is great in that each video has an immense amount of quality. check out the other videos and see how much effort was put in there
No, I don't actually speak French. I was just lucky enough to find detailed English sources!
@@zorbtyf Yeah
But I AM FRENCH
5:53 I see that Paris called itself New Netherlands for one second.
Where
@@cermysheepy8174 No it was a joke, but anyway.
I would love to see one about barcelona, I fins very interesting its history
What an amazing and enticing history lesson!
I admit I'm a little surprised the Romans never reestablished the mainland portion of the city just because of Frankish raids into interior Gaul in the third century. Sometimes they did stuff that makes me wonder if they knew the end was coming.
I still can't believe Paris used to look like a large farmstead... that's some big growth.
The real question is, Who was in Paris?
me
ni
ggas
great video mate
also a request: the History of either Beijing, Hanoi, or Manila every year, please?
Very good! From a parisian
Where did you get the information about population growth?
Amazing.
Wow really very interesting 🤓
Am I the only one that waited till Paris take over all of those little islands?
Wow Paris under thr Romans had 80.000 people. After the Romans the population dropped so much that it took almost 1000 years to get back to the same number
Paris is both a city and a département and since 2016 a part of Grand Paris metropolis. French organisation is so complex.
Looking forwards towards your future video on Rome.
Good video. Better if you included la Metropole du Grand Paris.
where you can find information on the population of cities in different eras?
For most major cities, you can find the information on Wikipedia.
wait, you mean to tell me that an island that is not even a kilometer long could hold a 75 000 population?
Why was this next top comment?
It´s a nice video (altough it just shows the political growth of Paris). But it should be slower; it is hard to follow all the information on normal speed.
It's incredible how the population grow down after the fall of the Western Roman Empire.
is it a game or did you draw it yourself?
Would be great if the sources were cited as some might want to use it for academic work. Thanks for this video!
Wow i didn't know Paris has only 2 million people, it's almost the same population as my city, Perth, but i doubt anyone has heard of Perth compared to Paris!
80% of Paris's population and urban area is outside of the districts.
91
Well, Paris is the city proper, wich is just the center of the actual urban area.
The actual urban area is about 12-13 M inhabitants.
You may experience the same problem of definitions with London.
There are :
- The City
- Inner London
- Greater London
Amazing
I love how the non-christians got lazy and named the BC era BCE even though its still the same year Jesus was born (most historians argue He was a real historical figure), instead of an "acutally important" event like the discovery of farming or any metal age
What's the song of the beginning?
It is much more likely that the Parisii were based in Nanterre. Excavations have shown a large settlement there, whereas no traces have been found on the Cité island.
It is probable that Julius Caesar lied to present a people easy to convert to the senate.
Please do Marseille it would be so interesting to watch such a video on Marseille
6:54
After seeing so much of the TNO lore, I would always think of Ost-Paris and West-Paris.
next: History of HCM city ( Vietnam )
Isn’t it called Saigon?
@@joebidengaming7532 no, It isn't
@@joebidengaming7532 It was called Sài Gòn,at least until 1975 i think .
Then it'll start as the Khmer city of prey nokor
@@talantran2602 we still call it that now, hcmc is too mouthful
Moscow: hold my beer and I'll show you the REALLY BIG CITY
History is wow😊😊
Hmmmm good job!!!
What is your source to the first era and where exactly did you find out the name "Lucotocia" (diffrent from the latin abriviation "Lutetia")
Great work sir! Now do the history of Warsaw with a brief moment of disappearing in 20th century.
Something wrong between the early Roman era and about 600AD where the Roman districts disappear from the map and only reappear after that. Seems like an significant error or am I missing some historical reality?
Are you gonna do the roman uear by year city =)
At 5:52 why did the island suddenly become much simpler.
river stuff
@@justacat2 swag
This vid is epic. I wish Paris was real
OMG THAT IS SO COOOOOOOOOOOOL
Please make a video about History of Budapest (The Paris of the East)
how is budapest paris of the east?
@@JerryP7a Every eastern european country calls its capital "The Paris of the east" 😂
@@majkel1684 lol
구독자수가 영상 퀄리티에 비해 너무 적습니다 ㅠ 언젠간 꼭 빛을 발하실거에여
C'est l'île Saint Louis au début ?
I’m from Paris, this is very good! Spark on!
from paris + prussian mapping ???? this is a joke
Prussian mapping from Paris, now that is cursed.
@@KageTheDanish cursed youtube images
@@Hugo-cn9no it isn't
Vous êtes parisien ? De quelle arrondissament ?
Just waiting for that Valhalla DLC to drop
Really nice video! Could you make one for the city of Rome, please?
I like the history of Paris from the start.
내심장이 저렇게 자라났구나
두근두근
Go back to Kim jong un
@@mhdfrb9971 김종운?김정은?뭔소리야?
Hey, could you do one of the city of Pamplona in Navarre?
Can you istanbul ? From byzantion times to this days ?
3:05 AC Valhalla
6:36 AC Unity
7:18 The Saboteur
Such a cute little town is Paris.
Crazy how it took over 700 years for Paris to get 80,000 population again.
Next: The history of Warsaw
🙂 🇵🇱
It will be blank in 1944
No mention of Paris during the English occupation? (During the One Hundred Years’ War) or the Paris commune, despite that though I loved this video!
@Louis Garidel yeah but it didn’t mention it as part of that state
I can’t be the only one that thought the music was going to break out into the Titanic theme at the beginning there??? 😅
Why Saint Louis island was empty until late in History? 5:02
Hello from France :)
川の形って2000千年前から全く変わってないんですか？
I believe there is a mistake. Paris wasn't at its origin on the island in the Seiner but more around the city of Nanterre a bit further west and it's the Romans who moved Lutecia (Paris) to where it is now.
Indeed, historians don't know for sure :
- Old, traditionnal historiography highlight the island of the Cité as the gaulish site.
- Important celtic archeological finds have been discovered in Nanterre (mostly burial sites), as opposed to Paris.
But...
- Paris having been continuously inhabited since +- 1 CE, ancient archeological sites may realistically have been destroyed among the centuries of constant building - destroying - rebuilding... The absence of very ancient archeological finds doesn't prove much in this context.
- The toponymy of Nanterre is itself a problem since it's name is gaulish (Nemetoduro = the sanctuary's gate) and is NOT Lucotetia, the known gaulish name of the main Parisi oppidum.
- The description written in 'de bello gallico' are nearly useless, for 1) C. J. Caesar wasn't present himself in the campaign against Parisis (it was Labienus), thus his written account is at best second hand. 2) Islands often changed, appeared, disappeared in a matter of months in such flat plain river such as the Seine. 3) A tight meander may have been confused as an island by Labienus observations.
- There are other archeological hypothesis such as St Maur des fossés.
Note that gaulish tribes often had very often more than one oppidum (helvetii for instance had a dozen oppida), commonly one for religious purpose (maybe Nanterre in this case), one for defense, one for trade.
@@elbentos7803 Thank you for this very interesting and detailed answer! Well, I stand corrected!
Perhaps, like in the case of early Rome (800 BCE), there were simply many tribes all around the region and they simply shared common infrastructures like graveyards, etc. ? That might answer in part why there is confusion between the two?
@@amauryhervouet2459
You're welcome, and there's nothing like "correction" : gaulish civilisation is poorly known except for very recent discoveries about material life (thanks to "sauvetage" archeology) - the very important discoveries of Nanterre burial site was among them.
A very good summary about gauls has been published a few years ago in an issue of dossiers de "pour la science" magazine (2008).
@@amauryhervouet2459it was only one tribe, the latins
If i remember correctly, during the reign of Charlemagne, Aachen was his personal favorite residence but NOT the capital of the kingdom. I'm not sure if the political class was following him to his numerous castles, but i can imagine why this fact is so entrenched, it was were most of the governing was done, Paris surely lost a lot of power but it was still the capital.
Whoa that's cool, if you don't mind me can you make Jakarta every year
can you do the history of Rome?
It has to be done, rome is such an important historical city.
Make one on kashi or mathura or delhi
When they could 30,000 people but now they cant even fit even 1,000 people 😂
next video history of Nitra city: every year - that would be very long video
2nd most visited city in the world (2021)
1st most visited city in Europe (2021)
1st most visited country in the world (2021)
can u make budapest?
Thanks for useing the secular BCE it's honestly underused...
That 70k population in 500m is straight up impossible, where did you get these population numbers?
I think it was an editing error, actually. There's quite a few of those in this video that I'm just now noticing :/
@@TheDragonHistorian I think it would also be better to assume urban area = city, or at least to mention the strong difference here. During most of history, a city was the same as an urban area, only in the 20th century some purely administrative separation were created. France especially, have a really weird and arbitrary way to separate things. Today those numbers would make Paris seem like a small city until you realize there's 12/13 million people in the urban area. An astonishing difference.
And those areas are, I think, part of the history of Paris. London worked the same way for a while, the big city started touching the smaller surroundering cities. The only difference is that they were administratively integrated into the bigger city afterward.
Good video overall though.
i visited Paris 2 years ago, really beautiful city, Is Paris or London older ?
Paris,his ancient name is Lutezia,it was a small gaul village expanded by the Roman.London,originally Londinium,is instead founded by the Roman after the conquest of the Britannia.
Can you do Sydney please?
Why are the population coming down?
It doesn't. Statistics are false.There are hundreds of thousands illegals not accounted for.
C’est donc pour ça que le département s’appelle « île de France »
Exactement par contre c'est une région
*sa région
C'est pas un département