You CANNOT Deny the Six-Day Creation Once You Realize THIS

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 кві 2024
  • You CANNOT deny the six-day creation once you realize THIS. In this presentation, Ken Ham shares his answer to the common question as a Bible-believing Christian, “Could God really have created everything in six days?”
    The Ultimate Answers Pack is available for purchase here: AnswersInGenesis.org/store/pr...
    Visit Answers.tv: All Answers in Genesis videos, live streaming, and much more-all in one place.
    Please help us continue to share the gospel around the world: AnswersinGenesis.org/give

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2,3 тис.

  • @TeleTonemonkey
    @TeleTonemonkey 6 днів тому +7

    Love to all, since you are quoting the Torah, wishing you and all Semitic nations the best in these troubled times.

  • @steveclauter6802
    @steveclauter6802 26 днів тому +10

    Ken, I still remember meeting you in the Phoenix airport in the 80's. Thank you for your faithful ministry!

  • @annwynn4827
    @annwynn4827 27 днів тому +108

    Take an Astronomy course. You will be so overwhelmed, you will never question anything about God’s creation! Our human minds cannot comprehend any of the Creation. Just be in awe of God’s love and mercy and power!!!

    • @brianlove8413
      @brianlove8413 26 днів тому +4

      Absolutely.

    • @dgerdi
      @dgerdi 26 днів тому +9

      When you consider all the „coincidences“ that must 100% fit to provide life in this form we know, can’t simply be coincidences.

    • @davidgardner863
      @davidgardner863 26 днів тому +14

      If you took an astronomy course, you would know the universe is billions of years old.

    • @romans3.25propitiation
      @romans3.25propitiation 26 днів тому +4

      ​@@davidgardner863 yep, which all equates to about nothing in the eyes and clock of Almighty GOD our Creator 😊

    • @mchooksis
      @mchooksis 26 днів тому

      @@dgerdi Why do you say that? What coincidences? There are no coincidences.

  • @jonathancase9934
    @jonathancase9934 28 днів тому +56

    Adding a little to Ken's comment about "day one". The first day in Hebrew reads "yom echad". In context, then, reading "there was evening, and there was morning, a day unified" so that evening is considered part of the day and morning was considered the other part, together they make a full day. The same word is used, for example, in Genesis 2:24 "Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother and cleave to his wife and they shall be "besar echad" The two are joined so that they are unified. Then the description of the second day also uses evening and morning leaving us to understand the previous "yom" was not only complete, but it was first.

    • @nelsonlighthouse8089
      @nelsonlighthouse8089 28 днів тому

      ... as it was before any of that was written... everywhere.... even outside the tiny part of the illiterate world that you think this particular god 'revealed' himself to, as other gods have elsewhere and everywhere... blah blah blah...

    • @syzygycalalignment
      @syzygycalalignment 28 днів тому +8

      @@nelsonlighthouse8089 Your comment makes less sense than the comment you are commenting on. It contains no punctuation, which makes your comment truly, as you have described it, "blah blah blah."

    • @nelsonlighthouse8089
      @nelsonlighthouse8089 28 днів тому

      @@syzygycalalignment is English not your first language ... ?? Or are you american?

    • @IndividualFreedomNet
      @IndividualFreedomNet 27 днів тому +3

      Thank you very much for sharing your light (insight)! God bless you!

    • @thomasmaughan4798
      @thomasmaughan4798 24 дні тому +1

      The sun was created on the 4th "day" so I wonder how there can be a morning and an evening?

  • @jmc8265
    @jmc8265 Місяць тому +379

    God could have created everything in a split second but he didn't in order to show/teach us something deeper.

    • @Oandad
      @Oandad Місяць тому +7

      What does the 7-Day creation story teach us? What's the deeper meaning?

    • @dorahngarman3188
      @dorahngarman3188 Місяць тому +20

      So many things in view here. God was establishing that he would be the Sovereign ruler of all creation because he brought these things into existence. Second, God was displaying his Omniscient and Omnipotent attributes for Angels to observe and for mankind to later come to understand. God was also setting a precedent for what would govern man's existence on Earth, that there would be a time for mankind to work to provide for his needs and a time to rest.

    • @shinnstoneer7
      @shinnstoneer7 Місяць тому +5

      That question is better focused internally. We're all on similar journeys and we're all at different places on that journey. God's word speaks to each of us in our place and time. To me, the 6 days of creation speaks to my need to be aware that I can't do most things in one go, especially the really important things. Even things that can be done quickly need to be done again and often soon. Things that last aren't completed in the snap of our fingers.
      Whether someone believes in God or not, the Word is always there and wise.

    • @bcars6215
      @bcars6215 Місяць тому

      @@Oandad
      Luke 18:17 the Lord Jesus speaking -
      "..Verily I say unto you, Whosoever shall not receive the kingdom of
      God as a little child shall in no wise enter therein..."
      2Tim 3:1
      "..This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come...."
      3:7
      ".. Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth..."
      Let us be as little children, dear readers.
      The Lord will lead us to all truth; we don't have to try so hard!
      Just believe; look up! Watch as He provides us with blessings like
      AiG and movies like "Is Genesis History?".
      We can hear the rocks in our own neighborhoods cry out, if we will just simply believe what the Lord says first and foremost!

    • @HS-zk5nn
      @HS-zk5nn Місяць тому +10

      exactly - to show work and rest

  • @mikerossi4741
    @mikerossi4741 Місяць тому +110

    Yes, I’m a simple guy who gets frustrated when people try to take away from the awesomeness of my God. I love how He made light days before He made the sources that give light.

    • @Swordsman69
      @Swordsman69 Місяць тому +5

      Hopefully they'll open their eyes before it's to late. ✝️😇❤🙏👣

    • @PastPresented
      @PastPresented Місяць тому +5

      Try looking at it this way: God made the light of Heaven, but it was too powerful for Earth, so he substituted the Sun and Moon.

    • @adamsmith7885
      @adamsmith7885 Місяць тому +9

      the Sun gives light, but it's not the *source* of light. Even atheists believe light proceded the existence of stars.

    • @graphicmaths7677
      @graphicmaths7677 Місяць тому +3

      @@PastPresented Do you have a source for that or did you just make it up?

    • @davidh.7138
      @davidh.7138 Місяць тому +1

      He created energy and he created matter before he created the stars and planets. You have to understand the terms with the wisdom of 20th and 21st century cosmology and geology, not what YOU think the ancients meant with their very limited vocabulary.

  • @globyois
    @globyois 29 днів тому +119

    “We must start from the text first,” said the host.
    Excellent axiom to follow.

    • @joszoet4003
      @joszoet4003 28 днів тому +2

      Depends on what hou read... Darwin..

    • @CrazyCowMCISCOOL
      @CrazyCowMCISCOOL 26 днів тому

      @@joszoet4003 😂😂

    • @brianlove8413
      @brianlove8413 26 днів тому

      @@joszoet4003 Theory, still!

    • @merrymuso
      @merrymuso 26 днів тому +2

      WHICH holy book?
      Islam: the Qu’ran, 1.6 billion members
      Hinduism: Rig Veda, Bhagavad Gita, Sama Veda, Yajur Veda, and Athava Veda, 1.1 billion members
      Buddhism: Dhammapada, Pali Canon, 376 million members
      Judaism: Tanakh and the Talmud, 14 million members
      Christianity: the Old and New Testament, and the Apocrypha, which are regarded as Scriptures by 2/3 of Christians (Catholics and Orthodox. 2.2 billion members)
      Sikhism, the Adi Granth, 10 million members
      Taoism, the Tao te Ching, 8 million members
      Baha’ism, the Kitab’i-Aqdas, 7 million members
      Confucianism, Analects, I Ching, Shi-King, Shu Ching, and Li Chi, 6 million members
      Jainism, Tattvartha Sutra, 4 million members
      Shintoism, Kojiki and Yengishiki, 4 million members
      Zoroastrianism, the Avesta, 3 million member
      Or the holy book you grew up and got indoctrinated to? The bible?

    • @globyois
      @globyois 25 днів тому +1

      @@merrymuso Even secular agree that the Bible more miraculous (and yes, atheist/secularist scholars have used that word to describe the New Testament) than
      Check on it, you’ll see.
      Now I’m not saying that such a thing that the God of the Bible exists, but to group the Christian scriptures in with those others you mentioned is facile, fatuous, and shows ignorance . . .
      no offense intended.
      Thanks.

  • @Hwi1son
    @Hwi1son 29 днів тому +5

    Love you brother Ken. Thank you for everything that you do. Surely God has blessed you.

  • @busker153
    @busker153 29 днів тому +67

    It always astounds me to hear people ask if God could have created the world in six literal days. Dude, God could have created it all in an instant! It is just as valid to ask why God took so long to create the world.

    • @joeysplats3209
      @joeysplats3209 27 днів тому +5

      Just this morning I was marveling at the incredible creation I see around me every day. All the critters and how the Great Flood really did a number on the face of the planet. The basalt columns where I live, the aquifers and caves, the mountains...

    • @robya.2223
      @robya.2223 26 днів тому

      @@joeysplats3209 Yeah, the tumors killing childrens everyday.

    • @merrymuso
      @merrymuso 26 днів тому +2

      So WHO created god then?

    • @tim57243
      @tim57243 26 днів тому +3

      ​@@joeysplats3209People who believe in the Flood typically believe that God is good. Does this include you? If so, how do you explain how a good God could commit the near-genocide that was the Flood?

    • @busker153
      @busker153 26 днів тому +2

      @@merrymuso That is a stupid question.

  • @ingela_injeela
    @ingela_injeela 26 днів тому +18

    That's why I appreciate you, Brother. Because you start with God's Word.

    • @allenchang6185
      @allenchang6185 7 днів тому

      is it really gods word though? anyone can write a book and say its gods word and put vague "prophecies" to convince people it must be gods word i mean alot books have prohecies that came true too

    • @ingela_injeela
      @ingela_injeela 7 днів тому

      @@allenchang6185 I have personally never heard of any other such book, where prophecies written hundreds, even thousands of years ago, proved to be right on every single point, and wrong about nothing. But yes, you are right. Many books have claimed to be "from God", only, at closer scrutiny, they could be discarded.
      One big testimony to the accuracy of the Bible, is the history of the people of Israel. Archaeology keeps confirming more and more details, confirming the biblical narrative.
      There is archeological evidence, and also independent historical sources, that confirm the history of the Hebrews and Israel. And in particular the life and time of Jesus, is very well documented.
      Fulfilled prophecies is one strong reason to believe in the Divine inspiration of the Bible. Only in His first coming, Jesus fulfilled between 200-300 detailed prophecies about His life, death and resurrection, that were made hundreds of years before His birth.
      The earliest prophecy of the coming Messiah is found in Genesis!

  • @cesiahsatterlee3093
    @cesiahsatterlee3093 26 днів тому +5

    Thank you brother Ham! You are a blessing!

  • @nicl8749
    @nicl8749 29 днів тому +27

    Ken we need more Christians like you, giving biblical truth.

    • @davegaskell7680
      @davegaskell7680 27 днів тому

      I like the use of the phrase "biblical truth" as a replacement for a word that's less polite.

    • @Mberrybb
      @Mberrybb 26 днів тому

      Biblical truth meaning made up by humans

    • @jimthomas1989
      @jimthomas1989 26 днів тому +1

      How about biblical fact ?
      It says one day !
      But a day to God is 1000 years to us humans
      2nd Peter 3 :8

    • @nicl8749
      @nicl8749 26 днів тому +1

      @@jimthomas1989 no , In the creation, God created everything in 6 literal days, a day is yom in the Hebrew text, so it was 6 days also Peter was saying a day is as a 1000 years saying God is timeless.

  • @lynncraig3005
    @lynncraig3005 Місяць тому +40

    Amen!!!! The scripture makes it crystal clear that God created everything in 6 days and rested on the 7th. But some people just don't want to believe it.

    • @ThatBoomerDude56
      @ThatBoomerDude56 29 днів тому +7

      It's a choice between believing what you can see with your own eyes and believing what some MAN wrote about God.

    •  29 днів тому +3

      I know I don't.

    • @arc001
      @arc001 29 днів тому +3

      No it doesn't , firstly, it's just a book and secondly, it's a highly interpret-able book and thirdly, it is really far-fetched not grounded in reality at all. Parts of it are but the super-natural parts aren't, no way to verify so your book is as clear as completely frosted glass. Sorry, just had to respond to what you wrote.

    • @jhurt3824
      @jhurt3824 29 днів тому +1

      @@arc001or you could've gone for a walk instead of letting your struggles with Christian's own you

    • @davidskolik5303
      @davidskolik5303 29 днів тому +3

      It’s not that we don’t want to. Without proper evidence, we have to assume it’s improbable. Same as for the existence of leprechauns and unicorns.

  • @michaeljones-bs9tn
    @michaeljones-bs9tn 19 днів тому +1

    So important to always take scripture in context with the whole of scripture and Mr. Ham did an excellent job of explaining. To take one scripture of a “thousand years is like a day”, is short sighted and ignores the awe of that with God’s Word goes God’s power to “speak” creation into existence.

  • @heels-villeshoerepairs8613
    @heels-villeshoerepairs8613 26 днів тому

    These books have been a part of my library for years now and are amazing, simple, and a must for every searching mind.

  • @heavenonthehorizon777
    @heavenonthehorizon777 Місяць тому +6

    Thank You Father God for Ken Ham and all his activities that help push the Gospel forward, for all the educational products he helps get out to the masses. Amen Thank you Ken.

  • @technicalsupport4139
    @technicalsupport4139 Місяць тому +79

    A very important point you left out. Is the seventh day Sabbath which is part of creation week. Remember the Sabbath day to keep it holy.

    • @hectorhernandez215
      @hectorhernandez215 Місяць тому +10

      Read book of Acts 2:46-47...
      and Acts 5:42.
      .also Revelation 4:8
      Helen G. White forgot to mention those texts in her doctrine....The Father and Jesus work in Sabbath.... don't miss it Matthew 12:12...John 5:17.... Sabbath is Holy, working or not ....

    • @statutesofthelord
      @statutesofthelord Місяць тому +9

      Excellent point. What is the point in a Sunday-keeper believing in a literal 6 day creation and then day of rest, when they don't Remember it every week like God said to?

    • @statutesofthelord
      @statutesofthelord Місяць тому +4

      @@hectorhernandez215 hector, God upholds the worlds on the Sabbath. Yes.
      And he told us to refrain from work on the Sabbath. Do you?

    • @hectorhernandez215
      @hectorhernandez215 Місяць тому +1

      @@statutesofthelord John 5:17

    • @hectorhernandez215
      @hectorhernandez215 Місяць тому +6

      @@statutesofthelord explain New Covenant...Do you know it?

  • @erichhonecker8548
    @erichhonecker8548 28 днів тому +15

    Brother Ken, I thank you and appreciate your ministry more and more every day!

  • @I_renounce_satan
    @I_renounce_satan Місяць тому +99

    Man wants to believe according to their terms. God is above that.

    • @timhallas4275
      @timhallas4275 29 днів тому +1

      How do you know that? Maybe God is OK with our terms. Who are you to say he is not?

    • @PBAdventures146
      @PBAdventures146 29 днів тому +3

      @@timhallas4275 The Bible determines that.. and it's quite clear what His terms are.

    • @timhallas4275
      @timhallas4275 29 днів тому +3

      @@PBAdventures146 The Bible is not the word of God. You are worshiping a book.

    • @PBAdventures146
      @PBAdventures146 29 днів тому +4

      @timhallas4275 actually I don't worship a book at all. I worship the Author of the book. In the beginning was the word and the word was with God and the word "WAS GOD" John 1:1. The Bible was inspired by the Holy Spirit to teach us about Christ so that we would ultimately know him personally and experience that relationship with the God of the Bible. We can see from Genesis to Revelation that was God's plan all along. The Bible teaches me about His character and points me to the Living Word. That's who my relationship is with.

    • @EverettWilder-wr3xh
      @EverettWilder-wr3xh 29 днів тому +3

      We worship the God of the Bible , you worship Harry Potter, have fun with that.

  • @nnamrehck
    @nnamrehck Місяць тому +19

    Excellent explanation!

    • @jimthomas1989
      @jimthomas1989 26 днів тому

      It was ?
      What about the difference in Time ?
      One day to God is 1000 years to us humans !
      2nd Peter 3: 8
      It was 6000 years to us humans not 6 days , it was only 6 days to God !

  • @IOSALive
    @IOSALive Місяць тому +20

    Ken Ham, This video is fantastic! I liked it a lot!

    • @Moist._Robot
      @Moist._Robot Місяць тому +1

      I’ve never heard anyone ask whether God could’ve created everything in 6 days.

    • @rayspeakmon2954
      @rayspeakmon2954 Місяць тому +5

      ​@@Moist._RobotAnd your point is what?

    • @Moist._Robot
      @Moist._Robot Місяць тому +1

      @@rayspeakmon2954
      That Ken Ham uses a strawman to start the video.

    • @rayspeakmon2954
      @rayspeakmon2954 Місяць тому +2

      @@Moist._Robot Mario beat me to it.
      What straw man?

    • @Moist._Robot
      @Moist._Robot Місяць тому +1

      @@rayspeakmon2954
      At the very beginning when he says people ask him if god could’ve created in 6 days. I e never heard anyone ask that.
      If you’re talking about a magical creator then it can do anything you can think of. So this question seems to be pointless both from the theist and atheist alike.

  • @intentionally-blank
    @intentionally-blank 29 днів тому +3

    Brilliant! Thank you brother Ken.

  • @John--qh9xl
    @John--qh9xl 26 днів тому +2

    Thanks for all you do, Ken. All this time and I didn't know you were Australian. ☺

  • @oldtimerlee8820
    @oldtimerlee8820 Місяць тому +42

    Thank you. Appreciate your ministry, you work.
    May God bless.

    • @ancataut7891
      @ancataut7891 29 днів тому

      It is very strange that some people appreciate when they are lied to and manipulated with a story that never happened in reality. In fact, those people are lying to themselves.

    • @mlamber7780
      @mlamber7780 27 днів тому

      @@ancataut7891 For example, like the story of evolution.

    • @ancataut7891
      @ancataut7891 27 днів тому

      @@mlamber7780
      There is evidence of evolution that is present even in your own body. For example the sinuses, the caudal bud and the perianal glands. Material evidence is indisputable by any sane person... Even in a court, whoever brings material evidence, won the case. Go to bed, sleep has been shown to help the brain recover...

    • @mlamber7780
      @mlamber7780 27 днів тому

      @@ancataut7891 ~ Romans 1:20

    • @ancataut7891
      @ancataut7891 27 днів тому

      ​@@mlamber7780
      Anyone can write anything in a book, including the authors of the Bible. This can never be proof of anything, can you understand? The physical evidence that exists in your body and that proves evolution, is overwhelming compared to anything anyone can write in any book. To understand this matter, two things are needed: to have discernment and not to be disconnected from reality...

  • @peterbassey9668
    @peterbassey9668 29 днів тому +16

    I think the mistake we make is to reduce God to our size and attempt to work out what He can or cannot do: a classical case of breaking the Ten Commandments!! In this case, it is the one which demands that we do not make any image of God! But that's what we do here. Oh but rather than accept the image God has given of Himself, we remake Him and dictate what He can or cannot do. Very sad. As others have said here already, God could've made everything in a blink but chose not to for a number of now obscure reasons.

    • @thomasmaughan4798
      @thomasmaughan4798 24 дні тому

      "I think the mistake we make is to reduce God to our size"
      Hopefully I grow to his size.

    • @HarmonicWave
      @HarmonicWave 6 днів тому

      The problem is we make up meanings for things without letting the Bible define it's own terms, like saying a graven image is us "limiting God" instead of what it actually is, a graven image that is worshipped, like an idol, carving or icon, etc. It's not limiting God to believe what the Bible tells us about Him.

    • @thomasmaughan4798
      @thomasmaughan4798 5 днів тому

      @@HarmonicWave "without letting the Bible define it's own terms"
      Then of course you have the problem of defining the words used in the definitions of biblical terms.

    • @Ridethebomb777
      @Ridethebomb777 День тому

      What I find absolutely laughable is the Christians and especially the Catholics putting up effigies of Jesus their saviour ... and Mary ... images ! This Christian faith is just riddles with contradictions and plagiarism. The clue is right there in Genesis ..... Let US make man in OUR likeness. Mauro Biglino has identified at least 20 Elohim in the old testament ...... but lets just sweep them under the rug because it muddys the story and really kills the funding and tithings !
      There is no mention of this God you speak of in the OT !

  • @peterwiebewall5608
    @peterwiebewall5608 Місяць тому +224

    God being Almighty, could have created everything in one day, or in one moment. And He did create everything in six 24 hour days. The Bible says it and that settles it.

    • @retiredbiker676
      @retiredbiker676 Місяць тому +5

      Right.

    • @davidjanbaz7728
      @davidjanbaz7728 Місяць тому +20

      Your Ham interpretations are wrong : he doesn't understand the Theology of the Genesis texts: it's NOT a Scientific text so don't pretend those days R literal 6x 24 hours.

    • @user-nh3pk1sh7e
      @user-nh3pk1sh7e Місяць тому +2

      Exactly.

    • @peterwiebewall5608
      @peterwiebewall5608 Місяць тому +7

      @@davidjanbaz7728 God have mercy on your poor pitiful soul.

    • @phantomrio5222
      @phantomrio5222 Місяць тому

      ​@davidjanbaz7728
      IT'S SCIENTIFICALLY PROVABLE. I am the one who SHUT up and shut down that clown and fake Stephen Hawking with irrefutable scientific proof.

  • @CDGMR1
    @CDGMR1 27 днів тому +2

    I bough those books. Love them. Thank you so much!! We need them now more than ever before.

  • @jlm4295
    @jlm4295 Місяць тому +3

    THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THIS EXPLAINS DEAR BROTHER GREETINGS FROM JOHAN D. A BELGIAN SERVANT SOLDIER OF ALMIGHTY GOD YESHUA HAMASHIACH JESUS THE CHRIST I'M SAVED BY GOD'S LOVE GRACE AND MERCY HALLELUJAH AMEN
    I PRAY, BE STRONG BOLD PROTECTED AND WELL IN YESHUA'S HAMASHIACH NAME AMEN

  • @olgamasango8270
    @olgamasango8270 16 днів тому +9

    There is a God, He is alive and I thank him for my existence!

    • @stevepierce6467
      @stevepierce6467 День тому

      Hmm. Care to provide some evidence for that bald assertion? When you make a statement like that, you leave yourself open to a simple rebuttal: just remove the word "god" and insert any other entity, like pixies, or the Blue Unicorn. or Bertrand Russell's brass teapot, or Quetzalcoatl, and the statement is still just as valid.

  • @robsherwood5934
    @robsherwood5934 12 днів тому +3

    Challenge accepted.
    You are wrong.

  • @tonygassner5406
    @tonygassner5406 26 днів тому

    Ockham would surely agree. Our God is not a god of confusion, but of truth.
    Thank you for this concise fundamental explanation.

    • @Wertbag99
      @Wertbag99 7 днів тому

      Ockham's razor says the simplest idea is more often correct, and in the case of this story the simplest answer is that it is a man-made legend. We know ancient people wrote legends, we know there were many ideas of gods and of different creation stories, so for it to be another one is a simple answer that doesn't need to posit supernatural beings, other dimensions, magic and that all the data from scientific enquiry is wrong.

  • @gfinzer
    @gfinzer 8 днів тому +1

    What a thorough explanation. Thank you Ken.

  • @ratfinder7812
    @ratfinder7812 28 днів тому +5

    I’m going to the Ark and creation museum in May 2024 thank you so much Ken for building these two places, it’s been my dream to visit ever since they were built…..

    • @nathancook2852
      @nathancook2852 28 днів тому

      Why? The Ark Encounter contains many, many inaccuracies such as misrepresenting and flat out lying about the transition fossils we have. They claim a "kind" is similar to "family" while in Leviticus 11:13 it is used as "species. There is no way the number of species present on earth at the time could have fit on a boat that size, and the flood myth has been disproven over and over again. The story was stolen from others, namely the Epic of Gilgamesh.
      I have not been to the creation museum, but I am sure it contains inaccuracies as well given most thing Ken does is wrong and he only does the for $$$.

  • @christchurchottawa
    @christchurchottawa Місяць тому +37

    Thank you Ken
    And aig ❤

  • @gordonmitchell729
    @gordonmitchell729 28 днів тому +1

    An excellent way to explain this. Great work! 🖖❤️

  • @terrymoffett1356
    @terrymoffett1356 Місяць тому +4

    Thank you for pointing out the identifiers in each verse declaring what The Word Of God “SAID’ He did. ❤I really do appreciate that. MATTHEW 4:4 Man cannot live by bread alone, but by EVERY WORD that comets out of the mouth of God.

    • @cipherklosenuf9242
      @cipherklosenuf9242 28 днів тому

      People write books. If a person writes a book that presents itself as speaking for a real eternal being that’s ok…right? Whoever wrote Genesis wasn’t actually created yet when God said things such as ‘Let there be…” but…that’s fine!
      No problem …correct?
      Or is this narrative just metaphorical?
      If it’s not literal that’s ok too…right?

    • @LUKEc16v31
      @LUKEc16v31 28 днів тому

      @@cipherklosenuf9242 Have you considered that Moses didn't make this up but that was revealed to him?
      for no prophecy was ever made by an act of human will, but men moved by the Holy Spirit spoke from God. [2Pe 1:21 NASB95]

    • @cipherklosenuf9242
      @cipherklosenuf9242 27 днів тому

      @@LUKEc16v31 Yes, that is the traditional argument.
      And it uses one Biblical source to support the supernatural narrative of another Biblical source.
      What other sacred text is convincing as a result of internal circular reasoning?
      What we reliably know about natural phenomena is permitting you and I to engage in this conversation online.
      That’s not the power of prayer or divine revelation…reality functions exactly the same regardless of one’s opinions regarding invisible eternal self aware beings.
      Secular scholars have insufficient evidence to conclude that Moses was a real historical person
      and the Exodus narrative is considered legendary.
      (That doesn’t necessarily mean there isn’t some genuine historical influence, but critical scholarship doesn’t read Exodus as an historical account.)
      What are your thoughts?
      Is a real God ignorant of the facts and unworthy of fact tethered truth?
      An objective assessment doesn’t permit special pleading…faith does.
      The facts we have don’t support divine inspiration for any text.
      But why Shouldn’t faith be sufficient for the faithful?
      One can’t have it both ways.

    • @LUKEc16v31
      @LUKEc16v31 27 днів тому

      @@cipherklosenuf9242
      Doesn't matter what I think. Consider the following:
      [Luk 16:19-31 NASB95] 19 "Now there was a rich man, and he habitually dressed in purple and fine linen, joyously living in splendor every day. 20 "And a poor man named Lazarus was laid at his gate, covered with sores, 21 and longing to be fed with the [crumbs] which were falling from the rich man's table; besides, even the dogs were coming and licking his sores. 22 "Now the poor man died and was carried away by the angels to Abraham's bosom; and the rich man also died and was buried. 23 "In Hades he lifted up his eyes, being in torment, and saw Abraham far away and Lazarus in his bosom. 24 "And he cried out and said, 'Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus so that he may dip the tip of his finger in water and cool off my tongue, for I am in agony in this flame.' 25 "But Abraham said, 'Child, remember that during your life you received your good things, and likewise Lazarus bad things; but now he is being comforted here, and you are in agony. 26 'And besides all this, between us and you there is a great chasm fixed, so that those who wish to come over from here to you will not be able, and [that] none may cross over from there to us.' 27 "And he said, 'Then I beg you, father, that you send him to my father's house-- 28 for I have five brothers--in order that he may warn them, so that they will not also come to this place of torment.' 29 "But Abraham said, 'They have Moses and the Prophets; let them hear them.' 30 "But he said, 'No, father Abraham, but if someone goes to them from the dead, they will repent!' 31 "But he said to him, 'If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be persuaded even if someone rises from the dead.'"
      Bottom line: Jesus said if you do not believe the Scriptures, there is no other proof nor any amount of proof that will convince you otherwise.
      Call it circular reasoning. I'll trust the Scriptures to work in hearts, if I present them. It doesn't mean there are no reasons for faith. But the final step is faith.
      [Rom 10:17 NASB95] 17 So faith [comes] from hearing, and hearing by the word of Christ.
      [Heb 11:6 NASB95] 6 And without faith it is impossible to please [Him,] for he who comes to God must believe that He is and [that] He is a rewarder of those who seek Him.

    • @LUKEc16v31
      @LUKEc16v31 24 дні тому

      @@cipherklosenuf9242 My first reply to your comment had a lot of biblical citations. YT deleted it. Why would YT do that if the Bible is a collection of fairy tales about a made-up sky daddy? Now, that doesn't make sense.
      Are you sincerely looking for answers? If so, I'm willing to go forward. If not, have a good day.

  • @stevenspeakman5363
    @stevenspeakman5363 Місяць тому +10

    All these convoluted explanations. All you need is faith. If you have blind obedient faith you are sble to believe any old rubbish no questions asked or needed.

  • @geoffstokes
    @geoffstokes 28 днів тому +15

    Spot on Ken. Context, context, context.

    • @user-ex4wx1rj7s
      @user-ex4wx1rj7s 27 днів тому +2

      When referring to Ken Ham's discourse (and more especially the books he's trying to flog), "context" should be written as two words.

    • @davegaskell7680
      @davegaskell7680 27 днів тому

      @@user-ex4wx1rj7s Top marks for that comment. It's a pity we can only give a thumbs up once.

    • @user-ex4wx1rj7s
      @user-ex4wx1rj7s 27 днів тому

      @@davegaskell7680 Thanks ! It just goes to show that Ken Ham really can inspire me 🤣

  • @kennethtang514
    @kennethtang514 5 днів тому +2

    Man, as an evolution believing Christian, this is hard to swallow. I want to believe that evolution is God's mechanic for creation, but if it's literal days, then there is no space for evolution to be plausible.

    • @pmh1nic
      @pmh1nic 3 дні тому

      I think a major portion of the conflict is what you mean by the word "evolution". Evolution on a micro level (adaptation and variation with a species) is well grounded in hard science. Evolution on a macro level (genetic change that creates whole new species, fish to mammal) has been proven to be statistically impossible via genetic science. There is no proven or plausible genetic pathway to get from amoeba to man.

    • @Minifliek
      @Minifliek 2 дні тому

      Riddle me this, if the Ark fable really happened how quickly did animals have to evolve to diversify into all the species we have today?

  • @andyt1478
    @andyt1478 28 днів тому +3

    The coolest thing to me is He created an earth that already had age to it and a man and a woman fully grown and capable of bearing children. Amazing

    • @MARiordan
      @MARiordan 25 днів тому +1

      Absolutely unbelievable!!!

    • @John-jd7mm
      @John-jd7mm 8 днів тому

      @@MARiordan "unbelievable"
      as in "not believable"

  • @guitarmeggedonit5232
    @guitarmeggedonit5232 Місяць тому +17

    You break things down with logic and the bible, thank you!

    • @user-ex4wx1rj7s
      @user-ex4wx1rj7s 28 днів тому +1

      There seems to be a slight problem of word-order here. Do you mean "your logic breaks down with the bible" or "the bible breaks down with logic"? Either of these positions is perfectly tenable.

  • @clintonleviner6638
    @clintonleviner6638 10 днів тому +3

    Lol, it's like watching a flat earther argue against other flat earthers about how big the "disk" is.

  • @cherylebersohl4847
    @cherylebersohl4847 29 днів тому

    Thank you for such reasoned information that we can use when people challenge us. We need to be saying more than just a quick answer of, “God said it, so I believe it”. There is too much opposition to Christianity these days, we need to be prepared to give an answer!

  • @noweternity3101
    @noweternity3101 25 днів тому +2

    THANK YOU !!!

  • @adamsmithyman7973
    @adamsmithyman7973 26 днів тому +7

    Thank you Ken for staying true to the truth and sharing the truth. AIG is such a blessing.

    • @philhart4849
      @philhart4849 20 днів тому

      "Thank you Ken for staying true to the truth and sharing the truth. AIG is such a blessing." You speak only of your own truth.

    • @davidskolik5303
      @davidskolik5303 13 днів тому +1

      I think you better grab a dictionary and look up the word truth. Kenny boy is out to lunch.

    • @nissimhadar
      @nissimhadar 10 днів тому

      AIG is a scam. Only a fool thinks otherwise

  • @tamararivera7312
    @tamararivera7312 Місяць тому +46

    Praise the Lord

    • @merrymuso
      @merrymuso 26 днів тому

      Which one? ALLAH RA VISHNU HORUS ARISTAEUS ATLAS
      CRONUS DIONYSUS EREBUS EROS GLAUCUS HADES HELIOS
      HEPHAESTUS HERACLES HERMES HYMENAIOS KRATOS MOMUS
      MORPHEUS BUDDAH or one of the other thousands of gods?

    • @jasongates-
      @jasongates- 25 днів тому

      @@merrymuso There is only one Lord. Humans believe different things.

  • @revv45acp71
    @revv45acp71 Місяць тому +4

    Ken, thank you so much for your decades of presenting the truth! May God continue to bless and use you. Please consider doing a promotional video for Andrew's amazing new videos presenting his recent work in Grand Canyon. People need to see that!

    • @ancataut7891
      @ancataut7891 29 днів тому

      This individual is doing a practical exercise of psychological manipulation with your mind. Do you really not notice this extremely clear fact?! Wake up!

  • @xraargu6212
    @xraargu6212 28 днів тому

    Ken, I love your approach to explaining creation and the Bible. I don't always agree, but I find myself having to check my understanding when I hear your defense of the scripture.
    In case of the day argument, as my kids say when I ask "Cookies or ice cream?", "¿Por qué no los dos?" . I appreciate Schroeder's approach in "The Science of God". *If* the observer/author is being shown the past from the present (when Genesis is written) then time in the past (at creation), when the universe was more compressed, would be moving faster (much faster). So, the observer see's a day go by for each day of the creation story. I am not saying Schroeder is right, but the math roughly works out and that blew my mind, and appears to reconcile the day vs epoch argument.

  • @IsaacS2010
    @IsaacS2010 Місяць тому +12

    Excellent! So important to understand and to believe. We can trust what our God has told us in His Word.

    • @paulbrower
      @paulbrower 29 днів тому +1

      I find more to trust about God in a tetbook of physics, chemistry, biology, or mathematics.

    • @cipherklosenuf9242
      @cipherklosenuf9242 28 днів тому

      Seriously? Or seriously well played?

    • @Joshua-dc1bs
      @Joshua-dc1bs 23 дні тому +1

      Why do you believe the Genesis account is God's Word? Does the creation account state " created" or " created"?
      Clearly, the creation account is speaking in third person. It's just a creation story made by people who used a simple unit of time they understood (i.e., a day) to simplistically account for the formation of phenomena in the universe. These people didn't understand the natural processes (e.g., plate tectonics, supernova et cetera) that occur throughout the universe which cause the slow, gradual formation ("creation", if you want) of these things (i.e., mountains, nebula).
      In fact, the "creation" never actually finished. Creation is still happening. Right now, the naturalistic processes are still happening throughout the universe. It's just an ongoing process in the universe that never really "finishes".

    • @Korkzorz
      @Korkzorz 9 днів тому

      You don't have "his"word... You have the word of men claiming to speak for god and literally no good reason to think god is involved in any of it
      Fun fact for you.. at the time the Jews supposedly escaped from Egypt (which there is no evidence for), Canaan was a part of Egypt all the way up to modern turkey

    • @Raverraver9999
      @Raverraver9999 7 днів тому

      Space time dilation explains how the universe can be 6+ days at the point of creation and 13.8 bil years(where earth is) simultaneously. Time across the universe is not linear and is affected by extremely strong gravitational forces.

  • @jasongates-
    @jasongates- 29 днів тому +25

    Whenever people say "COULD God have," they already showed fallacy, because to say "could" for God is to imply that there's something GOD could not have done. And God can do anything and everything but lie.
    Also, thank you for reminding us of "context," because people think "content" and they forget "context."

    • @bite-sizedshorts9635
      @bite-sizedshorts9635 28 днів тому +1

      Your logic fails.

    • @westerlywinds5684
      @westerlywinds5684 28 днів тому +1

      @@bite-sizedshorts9635 How so? The comment is very true.

    • @scottdd2
      @scottdd2 27 днів тому

      He lied about the apple.

    • @TheMOV13
      @TheMOV13 27 днів тому

      @@westerlywinds5684 If God can do anything then it's perfectly reasonable therefore to say he could have done such and such. The person saying he could do such and such is not necessarily implying that there is anything he couldn't do, that's just you putting words into their mouth.

    • @joeysplats3209
      @joeysplats3209 27 днів тому

      Context is everything, except in certain situations.

  • @jakoboka
    @jakoboka 5 днів тому

    Ken, your voice is reaching the Netherlands as well😊

  • @krisv001
    @krisv001 29 днів тому +1

    Keep up the good work!

  • @TickedOffPriest
    @TickedOffPriest Місяць тому +13

    His Word answers all of our questions.

    • @user-ex4wx1rj7s
      @user-ex4wx1rj7s 29 днів тому +1

      For example... Question: “What do we do with a man who gathers firewood on the Sabbath day?”. His Word (Numbers 15:35): “The man shall be surely put to death: all the congregation shall stone him with stones”.

    • @TickedOffPriest
      @TickedOffPriest 28 днів тому

      @@user-ex4wx1rj7s You are conflating Old Covenant with New Covenant.
      Nice try.

    • @user-ex4wx1rj7s
      @user-ex4wx1rj7s 27 днів тому +1

      If “his word” answers all your questions, why is it that three-quarters of the comments here are from believers questioning (or mindlessly affirming) what the very first chapter of Genesis means? “God created the world in six literal days”. “No he didn’t: ‘day’ just means a long period of time”. “No, it’s a 24-hour day - if you don’t believe that, you can’t believe anything”. “God is outside of time”. "His time is not the same as ours". “St Peter tells us a day is like a thousand years”. “There was no time before God created the earth”. “What was the light before the sun was created?” “How was a day measured before there was the sun?” “Who wrote the 1st chapter of Genesis?” “God wrote it”. “No he didn’t, I believe Moses did”. “I think it was someone else”. “But God dictated it”. “It doesn’t matter”. “Yes it does, it’s God’s word”. “It’s not the literal truth”. “Yes it is”. “Genesis is just an allegory”. No it isn’t, yes it is, no it isn't, yes it... OK, let's just move on to chapter 2 where the nonsense really begins...

    • @TickedOffPriest
      @TickedOffPriest 27 днів тому

      @@user-ex4wx1rj7s Because man is arrogant.

    • @user-ex4wx1rj7s
      @user-ex4wx1rj7s 27 днів тому +1

      @@TickedOffPriest I don't see where arrogance comes into it. You claim that "His Word answers all of our questions". I simply ask why, in that case, believers so clearly cannot understand what ought to be a very simple description of the creation : a description reduced to the bare minimum in which there should be no room (and certainly no need) for confusion. Everyone - no matter how sincere - is left guessing at how long a "day" is and how there could be "days" before the sun was created. How is that arrogance ?

  • @Kate-wu9if
    @Kate-wu9if Місяць тому +5

    Ty Brother Ken..appreciate you & all you do!

  • @isahunnybee
    @isahunnybee 11 днів тому

    I love that! From now on ill ask them if they think God COULD do it? If so, why do they doubt it? And take it from there 😊❤

  • @jamesmcgowen4428
    @jamesmcgowen4428 6 днів тому

    1000 Years to you is a day to God we are about to finish the 6th day and enter the day of rest the thousand year reign of Christ

  • @urbandad885
    @urbandad885 29 днів тому +21

    People who think they know something are a constant irritation to those of us who actually do, but all is forgiven. Plod on.

    • @aaronstately
      @aaronstately 28 днів тому +2

      well put

    • @torreyintahoe
      @torreyintahoe 28 днів тому +6

      If you're listening to Ken then you don't know anything.

    • @gwreevesReeves
      @gwreevesReeves 28 днів тому +2

      ​@@torreyintahoeWay to turn off your brain, bud. Keep drinking that "Church of Big Science" kool-aid!

    • @torreyintahoe
      @torreyintahoe 28 днів тому +2

      @@gwreevesReeves The guy who believes in the talking snake trying to lecture the guy who believes in rational thought. You’re indoctrinated.

    • @gwreevesReeves
      @gwreevesReeves 28 днів тому +2

      @@torreyintahoe Says the guy who believes in "Goo to You by way of the Zoo"? No thanks. I'm the rational one here. You should get a mirror.

  • @christinefarrall9391
    @christinefarrall9391 Місяць тому +23

    Blessings Ken.

  • @Roger_Rabbit_Adventures
    @Roger_Rabbit_Adventures 25 днів тому

    Spectacular Explanation 🙏 ✝️

  • @TheLaw-mh4pb
    @TheLaw-mh4pb 13 днів тому +2

    I think the creation of the Earth is more complicated than simply stating it took 6 days. To God a day is a 1000 years and a 1000 years is a day. We also know that time isn’t constant and varies as you approach the speed of light. Since God IS light, I think it is safe to say his time is not the same as our time. So my conclusion is that God may have created the Earth in 6 “days” but it is certainly possible that those 6 “days” were much much longer in terms of “Earth days”. Perhaps the 6 days that created the Earth are the equivalent of billions of Earth years

    • @John-jd7mm
      @John-jd7mm 8 днів тому

      "Perhaps the 6 days that created the Earth are the equivalent of billions of Earth years"
      That actually makes sense.

  • @junepeyer1200
    @junepeyer1200 Місяць тому +6

    ❤ I’ve found (secularly) that some people are often ‘scared’ of the idea of a limitless, powerful God-I believe it’s a remnant of their own past trauma- maybe their abuser was functioning in a manner which appeared to be all powerful so to speak.
    As a Christian woman, I understand we may be in rebellion against God and our Savior.
    Be nice if these people looked at their traumatic pasts and begin healing to finally realize there’s a Father and Savior who will never abuse them and will never abandon them. I love this fact!

  • @ricksmith2580
    @ricksmith2580 29 днів тому +7

    “When the plain sense of Scripture makes common sense, seek no other sense, lest it result in nonsense.”

    • @user-ex4wx1rj7s
      @user-ex4wx1rj7s 29 днів тому +2

      "No one whose testicles are crushed or whose penis is cut off shall be admitted to the assembly of the Lord" (Deuteronomy 23:1). Plain good sense.

    • @Terrylb285
      @Terrylb285 29 днів тому +2

      @@user-ex4wx1rj7s the four corners of the earth , a plain reading of the text supports a flat earth, the sun rises and sets , a plain reading of the text supports the sun revolves around the earth. This is my body , a plain reading of the text supports communion actually being Jesus body.

    • @dorinamary7863
      @dorinamary7863 29 днів тому +1

      Does a plain reading of the text also support the two-Gods theory of the Old Testament?
      ""Now plead with God to be gracious to us. With such offerings from your hands, will he accept you?”-says the LORD Almighty. Malachi 1:9
      "''I have overthrown some of you, as God overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah, and ye were as a firebrand plucked out of the burning: yet have ye not returned unto me', saith the LORD." Amos 4:11 KJV
      "And Satan stood up against Israel, and provoked David to number Israel." 1 Chron 21:1
      "And again the anger of the LORD was kindled against Israel, and he moved David against them to say, Go, number Israel and Judah." 2 Sam 24:1 KJV
      Who was ruling the world under the Old Covenant?
      "I will no longer talk much with you, for the ruler of this world is coming. He has no claim on me," John 14:30
      "We know that we are from God, and the whole world lies in the power of the evil one." 1 John 5:19
      "Now is the judgment of this world; now will the ruler of this world be cast out." John 12:31
      "Concerning judgment, because the ruler of this world is judged." John 16:11
      The earth belonged to Satan after Adam fell.
      "Again, the devil took him to a very high mountain and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their glory. And he said to him, 'All these I will give you, if you will fall down and worship me'.” Matt 4:8, 9
      "In their case the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, to keep them from seeing the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God." 2 Cor 4:4

    • @pineapplepenumbra
      @pineapplepenumbra 29 днів тому

      @@dorinamary7863 More than 2 gods.

  • @Svensk7119
    @Svensk7119 День тому

    Thank you for explaining what "yom" means.
    This was a technical explanation. I wanted a philosophical one. I believe in Creation, but I believe God used evolution. This shows an involved Creator.
    I believe the days of the week are named in homage of those seven days of Creation.

  • @tymanmodel1018
    @tymanmodel1018 19 днів тому +1

    You all at Answers In Genesis need to make a CGI documentary called:
    Creation: Adam, Eve, and the Dinosaurs
    That would be awesome!!

  • @danjdavid
    @danjdavid 29 днів тому +8

    What a great, calm, reasonable explanation. Thank you Mr Ken Ham. So grateful for you.

  • @davidstinnett3889
    @davidstinnett3889 29 днів тому +12

    THE BIBLE IS ABOUT WHAT GOD SAYS HE DID! END OF DISCUSSION! Be blessed!!

    • @timhallas4275
      @timhallas4275 29 днів тому +1

      "God said"? Isn't it interesting that God said "God said" in the bible. Does that not sound like it was written by men... not God?

    • @PBAdventures146
      @PBAdventures146 29 днів тому

      ​@@timhallas4275 it was written by men.. inspired by the Holy Spirit. The Bible makes that quite clear. 2 Peter 1:21

    • @philiprobinson2011
      @philiprobinson2011 29 днів тому +1

      And exactly when did God say this? Strange that he has not uttered one word in the last 2000 years.

    • @PBAdventures146
      @PBAdventures146 29 днів тому

      @philiprobinson2011 your understanding of God the Bible and Christianity is extremely limited clearly. Amazing how some people feel the need to respond to things they have no idea about.

    • @philiprobinson2011
      @philiprobinson2011 29 днів тому

      @@PBAdventures146 I might suggest that your understanding is clouded by your blind faith, a faith based on no evidence other than the words and claims of other Human beings.

  • @jimthomas1989
    @jimthomas1989 26 днів тому +1

    Ken Ham !
    2nd Peter 3:8
    One day is with the lord as a thousand years and a thousand years as one day
    So it was 6000 years to us humans and 6 days to God !

  • @kayleneemery8217
    @kayleneemery8217 21 день тому

    Amen ! Blessings and appreciation from home .

    • @kayleneemery8217
      @kayleneemery8217 21 день тому

      Context is everything......when we seek His truth - or truth in general .

  • @TheGuy030770
    @TheGuy030770 Місяць тому +5

    Being how all life on earth is symbiotic, there cannot be any time between what one part is created till the next.

  • @jalontf2
    @jalontf2 28 днів тому +15

    "A day with the Lord is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as a day"
    Time as we know it is pretty insignificant to God. But in general I imagine Genesis' creation account being transcribed by Moses over the course of six days. Each day, God showed him one stage of creation.
    In any case, not something we should really be infighting about.

    • @brianlove8413
      @brianlove8413 26 днів тому

      There is references to God's rest day, this obviously did not finish at the conclusion of a literal 24 hour human earth day as it was used with regard to Israel not entering his rest when he made them stay in the desert for 40 years, "they shall not enter my rest". I don't know how many years after the sixth day concluded this event was, but it wasn't literally the next morning. Referenced in Hebrews also, and Peter as being applied to faithful Christians as well A day as a thousand years, vis vis for sure, possibly a lot more than a thousand years also.

    • @nooneyouknowhere6148
      @nooneyouknowhere6148 26 днів тому +3

      So many people use that phrase to explain away a literal 6 day creation when that phrase is used to explain God is outside of time. God defined a day as a litteral 24 hour period and God said he created everything in 6 of those.

    • @brianlove8413
      @brianlove8413 26 днів тому +1

      @@nooneyouknowhere6148 There were no Human 24 hour days when the creation account occurred, for starters, when does a day start? We use midnight to midnight, Israel used from 6 in the evening to 6 in the following evening. Something to look at regarding God's rest day. When the Israelites came out of Egypt, and were found to be wanting in God's eyes, he told them that they would not enter into his rest. We as Christians are also offered to enter into that rest, so his rest is still ongoing at this point, which indicates that a day in this case is far greater than our 24hr one.

    • @nooneyouknowhere6148
      @nooneyouknowhere6148 26 днів тому

      @@brianlove8413 I'm sorry. I am as guilty as anyone for getting caught up in arguing over things which do not matter, but distract us from our mission. We don't really serve our risen savior by arguing over this stuff. We are only instructed to go and make disciples. Period. We should focus our efforts on telling the good news of our savior. Not debating things which are in the past. The facts are; God created us for a perfect fellowship with Him. We through Adam, are born with a sin nature and thus out of fellowship. But God created a way for us to regain a right standing with Him through His true and holy sacrafice in our place. We have but to accept Him and repent. Then place Him as lord in our life and follow Him.

    • @brianlove8413
      @brianlove8413 26 днів тому

      @@nooneyouknowhere6148 You are absolutely correct, but bear in mind that God gave us the written word to guide us and to understand him. The scriptures explain themselves, just as I pointed out the rest day, and if it as is stated, it explains the creative day without the need for a human interpretation/explanation, i am just pointing that out. Some people for whatever reason love to parse out words, which we were warned about not doing.

  • @scottperine9820
    @scottperine9820 28 днів тому +1

    You ignore the word of God. You are asking for his wrath. We've been given plenty of warning for what is coming. Praise God. Hallelujah to the Lamb. Glory to God.

    • @nelsonlighthouse8089
      @nelsonlighthouse8089 28 днів тому

      What a pitiful god that bestows wrath on those can think for themselves... you can keep it.

  • @jeffmoore3828
    @jeffmoore3828 17 днів тому

    Theological Word book of the Old Testament relates that yom, as used in Gen 1 is a length of time of indeterminate length. This dictionary is most frequently cited proof of OT translation.

  • @felipekennedy3135
    @felipekennedy3135 Місяць тому +10

    The entire Holy Scripture is being written into my Heart from Genisis, to Revelation, as My and His Absolute Truth.

    • @rlittlefield2691
      @rlittlefield2691 29 днів тому

      Absolute truth, yes, but is it the meaning that it means in Hebrew, or is the meaning of the language it has been translated into?

    • @snowflakemelter1172
      @snowflakemelter1172 29 днів тому +2

      Live in a fantasy world where its safe.

    • @petervermeer.4904
      @petervermeer.4904 24 дні тому

      One day you will find out that is not the whole truth, definitely not the whole truth.
      Anyone can and may believe what they want. But many will be surprised eventually.

    • @felipekennedy3135
      @felipekennedy3135 24 дні тому

      @@petervermeer.4904 I am Born of the Spirit of the Truth of God, and the entire 66 Books that makes up the Holy Scriptures is the Absolute Truth of God; His Inspired Words, then The Word, which is God, manifested himself in the Flesh and confirmed the entire Holy Bible to be His Words, that were spoken by the Prophets of the Bible. So i will just say this to you, There's two paths a man can choose, the Paths of Death, or the Paths of Life, it's your choice, and from what you just typed you are saying God is a Liar, and you are chosing Eternal Death. Shalom

  • @thomasedwards5431
    @thomasedwards5431 29 днів тому +6

    Those that ask "COULD god?" believe in god. But not God. They do not believe in the infinite eternal omniscient omnipotent God.

    • @williamjpellas0314
      @williamjpellas0314 29 днів тому +1

      This. Spot on.

    • @danielholtxxl4936
      @danielholtxxl4936 27 днів тому +1

      They don’t want to believe the Bible. If they believe the Bible’s creation account then they have to believe all the rest of it. So if they can discredit the first chapter they can ignore the rest.

    • @thomasmaughan4798
      @thomasmaughan4798 24 дні тому

      "They do not believe in the infinite eternal omniscient omnipotent God."
      You left out "omnibenevolent" and maybe some other omni's. Then you ought to define these words. Can God create a rock too heavy to move? Sure, then he moves it anway. It is easy to believe, or not believe, something so magical that anything is possible even the impossible. It loses MEANING and purpose.

  • @Icemario87
    @Icemario87 7 днів тому

    awesome teaching, Ken!

  • @RobertA-oi6hw
    @RobertA-oi6hw 29 днів тому +2

    Hey! Ken Ham has his own channel? Cool. Already subbed to AIG. Just subbed

  • @Swordsman69
    @Swordsman69 Місяць тому +54

    If it's in the Bible, believe everything and every word, it's Gospel. 🙏❤✝️😇✝️ I assure you.

    • @cephasrocks8516
      @cephasrocks8516 29 днів тому

      Please explain John 6:52-59.

    • @user-ex4wx1rj7s
      @user-ex4wx1rj7s 29 днів тому +8

      “Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live” (Exodus 22:18). “A man or a woman who is a medium or a wizard shall be put to death; they shall be stoned to death, their blood is upon them” (Leviticus 20:27).
      “… everything and every word, it’s Gospel”, you say. Which is why until at least the end of the 18th century, the Christian world put to death (often under torture or by burning at the stake) women falsely accused of witchcraft. Not a single one of them was guilty. They could not be guilty because there is no such thing as witchcraft. Their executions were nothing more than collective murder, because “If it's in the Bible, believe everything and every word, it's Gospel”.

    • @claytonsmith6148
      @claytonsmith6148 29 днів тому +2

      @@cephasrocks8516 This passages is telling us that to have eternal life you must except Jesus totally as the only way, through His work at the cross(death, burial, and ressurection). Where His body was broken through the beatings, being nailed to the cross, and the pouring out of His blood. This is a spiritual act by faith for mankind, for what Jesus did in the flesh. This must be excepted totally by faith: KJB Hebews 11:6, and those that operate in the flesh cannot understand the things of God. He only will allow a person who doesn't know Him, to understand just enough to get saved! KJB Romans 8:5-8

    • @cephasrocks8516
      @cephasrocks8516 29 днів тому +2

      @@claytonsmith6148 With respect, I submit that you are providing me your interpretation of the Bible Scripture where Jesus says you must eat His flesh and drink His blood to have eternal life. If you are going to take the words of Genesis super literally, then you need to take these words just as literally.

    • @iriemon1796
      @iriemon1796 29 днів тому +2

      Thanks, but you naked assurances are meaningless, I assure you.

  • @tamararivera7312
    @tamararivera7312 Місяць тому +6

    How simple is it.
    Even child can understand it

    • @christopheespic
      @christopheespic Місяць тому +2

      Only a child*

    • @ancataut7891
      @ancataut7891 29 днів тому +1

      @@christopheespic
      Correct!

    • @ancataut7891
      @ancataut7891 29 днів тому

      @tamararivera7312
      This individual is doing a practical exercise of psychological manipulation with your mind. Do you really not notice this extremely clear fact?! Wake up!

  • @beckystuart3177
    @beckystuart3177 29 днів тому +2

    God is light

  • @user-df1gi9fn4t
    @user-df1gi9fn4t День тому

    Great teaching. Completely true

  • @victoriaclark4853
    @victoriaclark4853 29 днів тому +3

    YHVH did create the world 🌎 in 6 - 24 hour days. Genesis 1:14…signs and seasons. I love seeing the Creation Museum out the window behind you Bro Ken. CR & The Ark are my 2 favorite places here in Grt Cincinnati.

    • @D....A...e-fg8qh
      @D....A...e-fg8qh 29 днів тому

      2 Peter 3:8
      King James Version
      8 But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.
      6 God days, not man days. 6,000 years for creation. Not 6 24 hr days.

    • @victoriaclark4853
      @victoriaclark4853 29 днів тому

      @@D....A...e-fg8qhno…o completely disagree.

    • @D....A...e-fg8qh
      @D....A...e-fg8qh 29 днів тому

      @@victoriaclark4853 good for you. You're allowed to deny the facts.

    • @valaere891
      @valaere891 28 днів тому

      @@D....A...e-fg8qhHey bud, try read the entire chapter. It’s pretty short and it gives context to that statement; remember, in literature, context is king. Peter said that because people were basically saying, “Oh, His promise is never gonna happen, He’s just slow.” But Peter is saying, “No no. ‘the day (meaning time here, because nothing is specified, unlike Genesis) of the Lord will come like a thief’” (2 Peter 8.10). So when he says “with the Lord one day is as a thousand years” and vice versa, I believe he’s referring to how God is outside of time, so anything that’s slow or fast to us doesn’t mean it’s slow or fast for God; it’s on time. That’s what he’s saying there. Now in Genesis, you’ll have to look at the context again, just like Ken Ham was saying. There, Moses, prompted by God, made it very clear that he was saying a literal day, not an unspecified time. Does that make sense?

    • @valaere891
      @valaere891 28 днів тому

      Oh, I also forgot to mention: If I remember correctly, the number 1000 represents completion in Jewish or Hebrew literature, which further supports how God’s plans are perfectly planned, on time. It’s like how 40 years of a king’s reign is the “perfect” number for a king, or the number seven is a symbol for many things (see Daniel, I think).

  • @TheLysineContingency
    @TheLysineContingency Місяць тому +9

    Even if “yom” always means literal day in every other example (it is not), the question still remains as to whether that could be used figuratively in Genesis 1.
    For example, 1 Kings refers to the “outstretched arm” of the Lord. Now, if every other time the word “arm” is used in the Bible it was used in a literal sense, would it follow that the 1 Kings reference is to a literal appendage of God?

    • @tds06001
      @tds06001 Місяць тому +2

      You're ignoring the context of when the word "Yom" is used in the Bible. If you watch a longer video of Ken Ham's where he is discussing this topic, he covers this very clearly.
      "Yom" means literal day when a number is attached to it, or when morning or evening (or both) are connected with it.
      Every other time in the Old Testament, when those conditions are met, "Yom" is used as a literal day.
      What’s different in the first chapter of Genesis, other than your desire to impose your beliefs on the text?
      You're free to believe what you want, but I think you probably realize that it's wrong to purposely misconstrue his argument to try and prove your point.

    • @TheLysineContingency
      @TheLysineContingency Місяць тому +5

      @@tds06001 how have I misconstrued his argument? He is saying that because Yom normally is used to mean a literal day, therefore it means a literal day here. But that doesn’t do anything to prove the language isn’t figurative. That’s why I gave the “arm” example

    • @valerieanne223
      @valerieanne223 29 днів тому +1

      With A Mighty Hand and an Outstretched Arm His Love Endures Forever. Sing Praise. (Represented by Lamb bone on the Passover Plate!) THANKFUL +

    • @TheLysineContingency
      @TheLysineContingency 29 днів тому

      @@tds06001 I can't view your reply for some reason. Idk if it is because there was a link in it?

    • @anthonyb.2876
      @anthonyb.2876 27 днів тому +2

      The word "yom" is inconsequential, it's the context that gives meaning. Evening, morning, the first day. I could say "back in the day" or "it was the day after", etc. The same word is used, but we find out the specifics in the text. There's also Exodus 20:11 where the meaning is reiterated and repeated, referencing the 7 day week. I thought Ken explained it pretty well personally. What's interesting to me is that many times Christians and non Christians alike focus way too much on this issue. Not that it isn't important (or even necessary), it is, but that it's not the only hard to believe statement in the Bible. As if to convey that it's the only issue a person can struggle with in the text. And if we could simply get past that "craziness", everytjing else would be easy to digest. But you could make it 6 billion years and you'll soon be face to face with the parting of the red sea, water from a rock, a talking donkey, etc.. Finally culminating in the ultimate miracle, Gid in the flesh being raised from the dead. Sadly, I've also seen that once Genesis isn't literal, then neither is the flood, etc.. It then gives license to interpret any text in the Bible based on human probability or ability, limiting God's power and stripping Him of the very thing that makes Him so. I guess my point is this, believing in a literal 6 day creation is the least of my problems haha. I'll look foolish to the "world" for a thousand other things I believe according to God's word. What's interesting is (as MacArthur has stated), Genesis sets a precedent for the entire Bible. It confronts our heart with an immediate question, will we choose to believe? Even setting aside what we can see with your eyes. "For we walk by faith, not by sight" (2 Corinthians 5:7). This is an obvious observation from the text of course, but the Lord makes it clear that while profitable, only the Spirit can convict someone of these truths. Not arguing, but thought it might help. Again, me personally, I'm perfectly fine with looking crazy for the Lord haha. He's given me ample reason to trust Him and His word. I don't expect to be able to (nor can I) argue someone into believing. But at the same time, we're called "to give an account for the hope that is in you, yet with gentleness and reverence" (1 Peter 3:15). K, essay over 😊

  • @Dulc3B00kbyBrant0n
    @Dulc3B00kbyBrant0n 8 днів тому

    God bless yall

  • @therooster6104
    @therooster6104 29 днів тому

    God Almighty has the power to do as he pleases, he gave his son to us , who else does this for all humanity 🙏🏼🕊️🙌🏼🙌🏼🙌🏼 Hallelujah

    • @snowflakemelter1172
      @snowflakemelter1172 29 днів тому +1

      What was he doing during the Holocaust?

    • @jonasmlgaard-asmussen9844
      @jonasmlgaard-asmussen9844 29 днів тому

      I suppose you give as in sacrificed. Where is Jesus now then?

    • @josephinestecak4945
      @josephinestecak4945 27 днів тому

      Why would a super power God have a Son, one asks?
      Just maybe it is a distortion in the translations, or made to appear that way to give people a simple but fantastical religion to follow. Until the real truth could eventually be understood or accepted. I say this not as a disbeliever but as one who questions everything and not just blindly follow.

  • @adamsmith7885
    @adamsmith7885 Місяць тому +14

    Exactly. Thank you Jesus for softening my heart so that I accept your word as a child does. ✝️
    Sidenote, have you noticed how Jesus said the Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath? And how God exiled Adam from the garden to work the ground? God knew all along that Adam and his descendants would need the Sabbath! ✝️

    • @snowflakemelter1172
      @snowflakemelter1172 29 днів тому

      You need a gullible child's mind to accept these childish fantasies

    • @user-ex4wx1rj7s
      @user-ex4wx1rj7s 28 днів тому

      I don’t remember the Bible saying anything about God softening people’s hearts, but it does tell us about him hardening hearts. For example, when Pharaoh was about to concede to Moses’ request to free his people, God “hardened Pharaoh’s heart” and then slaughtered all the first born sons of Egypt. We would call this a war-crime today.
      Likewise the God of the Old Testament makes it quite clear that the Sabbath is devoted to him and to worshipping him. Any work - even just lighting a fire - is to be punished by death, as is illustrated by the stoning to death (on God’s orders) of the man who gathered firewood on the Sabbath.
      Are you sure it’s your heart he softened?

    • @789genie
      @789genie 28 днів тому

      Amen

    • @adamsmith7885
      @adamsmith7885 27 днів тому

      @@user-ex4wx1rj7s "I will take away their heart of stone and replace it with a heart of flesh."
      Just because you don't remember, doesn't mean it doesn't.

    • @adamsmith7885
      @adamsmith7885 27 днів тому

      @@snowflakemelter1172 Where did I say anything about fantasies? You replied to the wrong comment.

  • @jstube36
    @jstube36 Місяць тому +4

    The problem with the genesis creation account. Is it was written at a time when there was little knowledge of Geology, Anthropology, and actual History. That ancient story does not seem to fit with those Scientific studies. For instance it took about 700 million years for all the elements to be in place for life to be possible. The Sun existed about 100 million years before the Earth was formed. We also need to take into consideration the whole Genesis account. A writing that includes: magic fruit that opens eyes, a talking serpent, a Woman formed from a rib of a man, angels and demons making love to mortal humans, This is the language of fairytale and fantasy. That's why we have to ask questions like: Did God really say? or did things really happen as written in Genesis? Ken Ham always talks of foundations. And given what we know now compared to what we thought we knew. Maybe it's time to wonder if the foundation based on the Genesis account is as solid as once thought. Or simply not as infallible anymore.

    • @Ice2Eskimos
      @Ice2Eskimos 29 днів тому

      Don't confuse the length of the "days " of creation of life on earth with the age of the Universe and the planet. Gen 1:1 simply states that In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." The 6 creative "days " are subsequent to the creation of the Universe with no time limit/ age given on that point.

    • @jstube36
      @jstube36 29 днів тому

      @@Ice2Eskimos So maybe Jesus took 3000 days instead of just 3 to rise from the dead. Or did that really happen as written?Did God, according to Genesis, make it rain for 40 days and nights or 40000. Genesis clearly states that it was 6 literal days of creation while God rested on the sabbath. Hence the predication for the 4th/Sabbath Commandment. Then again maybe that Commandment was just a figure of speech or symbolic metaphor. Ken Ham often talks about people trying to fit the actual age of the Earth into the Genesis Creation. account. But I think it's more people trying to fit the Biblical creation account into with actual History. One way or another.

    • @ancataut7891
      @ancataut7891 28 днів тому

      @jstube36
      This individual is doing a practical exercise of psychological manipulation with his followers, whom he has literally brainwashed. He is a narcissistic manipulator by any standards.

    • @TranscendentLion
      @TranscendentLion 27 днів тому +1

      @@ancataut7891 Where's the manipulation? He/she is simply pointing to scientific facts - that does not make him/her a 'narcissistic manipulator'.

    • @ancataut7891
      @ancataut7891 27 днів тому

      @@TranscendentLion
      Have you heard of "circular reasoning"? It is a logical error or a logical fault and this individual uses this process as a manipulation tool. Moreover, everything he says is a manipulative construction. Have you studied the field of psychological manipulation at all? Do you even know the basics? I am not referring to the dictionary definition of the term, but to the constituent elements, have you read anything related to this? Do you know what manipulation is and how a manipulator can be recognized in practice?

  • @johnjamesthomson1
    @johnjamesthomson1 7 днів тому

    "But do not forget this one thing, dear friends: With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day” (2 Peter 3:8)

  • @marcelocorrea6788
    @marcelocorrea6788 20 днів тому

    I do love this man's courage and firminess. (2000)thousand up to Jesus, (2000) up to Abraham, (2000) thousand up to Adão and Eva. Anithing else is presuposition. Let it be like God said: because in six days God created the heaven and the Earth exodus 20v11.

  • @bingo7799
    @bingo7799 Місяць тому +5

    If a day and evening is determined by planet rotation in the sun's light, how were there days before the sun was created?

    • @adamsmith7885
      @adamsmith7885 Місяць тому +1

      Then it necessarily follows that a day/evening is NOT determined by "rotation in the sun's light."

    • @bingo7799
      @bingo7799 Місяць тому +2

      @@adamsmith7885 I don't get dogmatic but it does seem to leave room for something other than a 24 hour day as we know them now.

    • @edwardhines2237
      @edwardhines2237 29 днів тому +1

      Does not the creator of time know everything there is to know about time. Those lights in heaven given for signs, seasons and days I believe were for our benefit to mark time.

    • @edwardhines2237
      @edwardhines2237 29 днів тому

      ​@@bingo7799I would go along with you if the txt were not so explicit...here is another thing to bend your mind...why is the water pre-existing in the creation narrative.

    • @ibperson7765
      @ibperson7765 29 днів тому +3

      @@bingo7799that’s a good point. Id say that the day itself exists and is created and the planet and sun follow it to mark and signal it in the physical realm

  • @deborahw3680
    @deborahw3680 Місяць тому +4

    He could have created it in 6 seconds if He wanted to.

    • @dixiewishbone5582
      @dixiewishbone5582 Місяць тому

      Great thought! Man would need a modern computer to do that; of course, a dead object does not create life!

    • @iriemon1796
      @iriemon1796 29 днів тому

      Then maybe He wouldn't have needed to rest! :D

  • @TacShooter
    @TacShooter 6 днів тому

    While we're on the subject, "echad" here definitely means mathematical singularity, otherwise we have to question the translation of "second day", "third day", etc. It certainly does not mean "three [days] in one" and the "seventh day" certainly does not mean 7 x 3 = 21.

  • @theepicenter4106
    @theepicenter4106 7 днів тому +1

    The issue with Ken Ham and Answers in Genesis arises from their rigid insistence on young earth creationism as the only biblically faithful view. They not only promote YEC but also actively criticize and ostracize those who hold differing perspectives. This approach not only fosters division within the Christian community but also undermines the core message of unity and love. While their resources may offer valuable insights, their staunch stance on YEC often overshadows the broader message of faith and grace.

  • @5winder
    @5winder 27 днів тому +5

    We're only here for six "days" (millennia)... then one day of rest in Jesus, then the devil has his last chance at us.

  • @robertgainer2783
    @robertgainer2783 12 днів тому +7

    I thought this was satire at first, then I started to realise this guy actually believes what he’s saying. Incredible! The last thousand years of human enlightenment darkened in one mind through the sheer determination to believe the unbelievable. What’s next, a man living three days in the belly of a big fish? They are stories and metaphors. They don’t lose power just because they are not literally true. But they do lose power if you insist they are literally true.

    • @chrisnestor7219
      @chrisnestor7219 12 днів тому

      So how do they lose power if one insists (as more people than I think you could imagine do) that they are literally true?

    • @robertgainer2783
      @robertgainer2783 12 днів тому +1

      @@chrisnestor7219 When you have answered that question for yourself, you will be enlightened. Nothing I can say will convince you, you’ll just have to wait until the penny drops.

    • @GraemeHT
      @GraemeHT 8 днів тому

      Exactly

    • @John-jd7mm
      @John-jd7mm 8 днів тому

      Agreed. Bible stories are probably stories that ancient people made up in order to educate their children ("mommy, where did we come from?") and all of that. Since no one knew the answers, people made up stories. Same in every single human culture throughout history, all over the planet. Check out Joseph Campbell's "Power of Myth." He explains this in greater detail. (BTW, the 'kid stories' thing is my own conjecture, not Campbell's)

    • @chrisnestor7219
      @chrisnestor7219 8 днів тому

      Well, the sticking point for me became the fact that Jesus actually lived. These writings about him in the New Testament are from witnesses.

  • @rickwarner516
    @rickwarner516 24 дні тому

    Amen thank you 👍🏽❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

  • @robb6059
    @robb6059 28 днів тому

    On coming out of the lotus, Brahmā, being guided by the divine potency tuned his mind to the act of creation under the impulse of previous impressions. But he could see nothing but darkness in every direction.
    Śrī
    Brahma-saṁhitā

  • @manamanathegreat4986
    @manamanathegreat4986 27 днів тому +10

    The only thing that blows my mind is why people toss their money at this charlatan ....
    Boggles the mind how people can be soo naive.

    • @vtwinjimmyful
      @vtwinjimmyful 27 днів тому

      You call people naïve
      Have you bothered to study the Bible to at least have minimal understanding?
      Or are YOU just winging it in your ignorance

    • @manamanathegreat4986
      @manamanathegreat4986 27 днів тому +4

      @@vtwinjimmyful
      I have studied it....
      and the history of the religion.
      Have you?
      How informed are you?
      Or are you just winging in YOUR ignorance and agreeing with the echo chamber?

    • @user-ex4wx1rj7s
      @user-ex4wx1rj7s 27 днів тому +3

      @@vtwinjimmyful I was brought up with the usual handful of sugar-coated versions of a few hand-picked and carefully edited stories from the Bible. Reading it and studying it have since revealed to me an appalling compendium of evil, barbaric cruelty, injustice, hatred, intolerance and immorality.

    • @manamanathegreat4986
      @manamanathegreat4986 26 днів тому

      @user-ex4wx1rj7s
      Then you get it.
      Nice to meet someone with some intellectual integrity when it comes to the Bible.

    • @dinotherugger4040
      @dinotherugger4040 9 днів тому

      ​@@user-ex4wx1rj7s I wonder, where do you have the standard to judge what exactly is an appalling compendium of evil, barbaric cruelty, injustice, hatred, intolerance, and immorality? You contradict yourself. You have NO base or standard by which to judge what is good and what is evil? If I simply believed in the concept of "the survival of the fittest," then there should be nothing wrong with the killing off of those who are weak and a burden to society, right? I mean it's for the betterment of the future. But the God of the Bible has taught me that ALL humans are valuable and are made in His image (Genesis 1:27 & Psalm 139); therefore, I am to be loving towards others and seek the betterment of their wellbeing.

  • @erichill5208
    @erichill5208 Місяць тому +5

    The biblical account of creation week. Shows perfectly how orderly God really is. Sure God probably could have created it all in one day. But no God created each particular things one day at a time because that’s the order and recipe for survival of all plants and mankind. Creation week also set the seven day cycle that still exists perfectly today. And it’s an example to REMEMBER. As God so lovingly reminded us in exodus 20:8-11. Work six days and rest from your work the seventh day as God did to memorialize and remember creation and our loving CREATOR. When kept out of love the SABBATH DAY is a wonderful blessing a weekly gift to all mankind from God

    • @snowflakemelter1172
      @snowflakemelter1172 29 днів тому

      You made that all up though.

    • @erichill5208
      @erichill5208 29 днів тому

      @@snowflakemelter1172 read the bible. I made up not one point. It’s all in the bible. Starting with genesis 1 verse 1 ( in the beginning GOD CREATED……). And spells out each day of creation exactly the order God created the earth and all things in and on it. 🙏. And if you don’t believe the biblical account of the beginning and creation week. Then you are saying you reject the truth of our loving Father and Creator. Thus choosing to follow Satan into the darkness of evolution and eternal death

    • @snowflakemelter1172
      @snowflakemelter1172 29 днів тому

      @@erichill5208 the bible is a fantasy book written pre science not to be taken literally , come on use your brain.

    • @GR-wi2nh
      @GR-wi2nh 29 днів тому

      @@erichill5208 There isn't any evidence that supports the assertion that a god of any kind created the world as we know it.

    • @user-ex4wx1rj7s
      @user-ex4wx1rj7s 28 днів тому +1

      Very orderly. He created the earth in total darkness before bothering to switch the light on, at which point he noticed it was shapeless and there was water everywhere. He didn’t create the sun or the stars until after he had created the earth, the days and the nights. The moon was designed to “govern” the night, although it is quite often visible in daylight (and not always in the dark) - a small error of calculation. I’m still not sure where all that water “above the firmament” went to. He doesn’t seem to remember if he created plants before humans (chapter one) or the other way round (chapter two). Or if it was men and women (chapter 1) or just one man (chapter 2)...
      His recipe for survival went a little awry : more than 99% of life forms have become extinct. Only the wonderful work of scientists has allowed humans to overcome some of the devastating effects of previously incurable illnesses, child mortality rates and debilitating handicaps.
      As for the Sabbath, he is so loving that he tells us that if we so much as light a fire in our homes, we shall be put to death. As with the man who picked up sticks on the Sabbath: not just put to death, but brutally battered to death with stones - on God’s specific orders - by all the villagers. A wonderful blessing indeed.

  • @LawrenceWicks
    @LawrenceWicks 29 днів тому +2

    Doing the work of answering such questions strengthens our confidence in the scriptures.

    • @user-ex4wx1rj7s
      @user-ex4wx1rj7s 29 днів тому +3

      Answering such questions correctly certainly wouldn't !

    • @jhurt3824
      @jhurt3824 29 днів тому

      @@user-ex4wx1rj7s I'm a bit different than most you'll find here. The problem with people like you is you share your misery. I'd love to help you on a better path but I'm guessing by your comment you've chosen otherwise. Until then go have grandiose atheist discussions with your buddies over on some random channel that like to discuss such things. Here we discuss god and our role as christians

    • @christopheespic
      @christopheespic 29 днів тому

      ​@@jhurt3824Other ideas are not welcome 🙄.
      Who dares challenging your beliefs....

    • @user-ex4wx1rj7s
      @user-ex4wx1rj7s 29 днів тому +1

      @@jhurt3824 Thank you for caring so deeply about my misery, but I can assure you that I am perfectly happy on my chosen path, upon which I don't need to convince myself that "discussion" means excluding other people's views, being rude to unknown interlocutors and hiding behind ill-informed bigotry. Or perhaps that is what you consider "your role as a Christian" to be.

  • @CDGMR1
    @CDGMR1 27 днів тому

    Thank you