If visible matter in the universe only account for ~5%, the CMB contains a constant gravity field G --> why do we always think gravity as orbitals attraction between non-relativistic masses along some larger radius geodesic? Why no linear analog for gravity? Imagine a weak gravitational coupling between a pendulum (non zero rest mass) traveling at velocity c , weakly coupled to our 3+1 dimensions.
I am a fan of Calculation and mathematics
If visible matter in the universe only account for ~5%, the CMB contains a constant gravity field G --> why do we always think gravity as orbitals attraction between non-relativistic masses along some larger radius geodesic? Why no linear analog for gravity? Imagine a weak gravitational coupling between a pendulum (non zero rest mass) traveling at velocity c , weakly coupled to our 3+1 dimensions.
Who are you and where are you from as well as why are you doing these ???
nah i am studying 16 hours a day but my ass does not know anything w kid...😢😢😢
Hi hello