ULTIMATE Sigma 35mm Group Test - f/1.2 vs f/1.4 vs f/2
Вставка
- Опубліковано 15 лип 2024
- Today I test the Sigma 35mm f/1.2 DG DN vs Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM vs Sigma 35mm f/2 DG DN to find out which of these options is the best 35mm lens from the Sigma range.
📸 LENSES 📸
Sigma 35mm f/1.2 DG DN: amzn.to/2Xn2gFH
Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM: amzn.to/35lEoqv
Sigma 35mm f/2 DG DN: bit.ly/3i26fkv
⏳ TIME STAMPS ⏳
Intro - @00:00
Lens Specs - @1:05
Vignetting, Distortion & Sharpness - @5:33
Image Review - @7:21
Bokeh @8:08
Auto Focus Comparison - @8:36
Auto Focus Video Tracking - @9:58
Auto Focus Noise - @10:42
Scoreboard - @11:14
🤘 JOIN US! 🤘
Instagram: / tom.calton
Facebook: / tom.calton
--------------------------------------
📽 MY EQUIPMENT 📽
//Cameras//
Sony A7III: amzn.to/2YgXnPa
Sony A7SII: amzn.to/2YkAWZE
Sony A6500: amzn.to/2Fzt3J8
//Full Frame Lenses//
Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art: amzn.to/3l0j7Zv
Sigma 50mm f/1.4 Art: amzn.to/2EakbcK
Sony 85mm f/1.8: amzn.to/2E9Gorm
Sigma 135mm f/1.8 Art: amzn.to/3ld4Usq
Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8: amzn.to/2Ye3KTB
//APS-C Lenses//
Sony 20mm f/2.8: amzn.to/3aJqDn2
Sony 35mm f/1.8: amzn.to/2YgYsXe
//Lighting//
PixaPro CITI600 Pro: amzn.to/3geD1MW
Godox V860II: amzn.to/32b7q9D
Godox XPro-S i-TTL Wireless Trigger: amzn.to/2YiNrou
Godox SL60W: amzn.to/31bSetE
//Audio//
RodeLink VideoMicro: amzn.to/2Qd9b0F
RodeLink Filmmaker Kit: amzn.to/2CNTDgO
Tascam DR-10c: amzn.to/2YkdQSL
Sennheiser ME 2-II Lavalier: amzn.to/3l4PQNt
//Stabilisation//
Zhiyun Weebill-S: amzn.to/31fouMM
//Field Monitor//
Feelworld Master MA6P: amzn.to/2Yl1Gcl - Навчання та стиль
It's the f/2 for me. Such a reliably beautiful lens. Also, it goes anywhere, doesn't attract too much attention and is an ideal walk around option, especially for Sony a and Lumix S cameras.
Good choice 👍
So nice to see this lens' performance on your video, it's really makes me want to have one.
Since there is a new DN version for sony , and the second-hand price of old HSM is almost half of new DN's price , which would you recommend to buy?
Thanks a lot Tom, it helped me a lot to make my final choiiiice.
My pleasure, thanks for watching
Thanks for great comparison! :)
Glad you liked it! 👍
Tom, this is a wonderful comparison of Sigma 35 range. Have you done a video or are you going to do a video comparing the brand new Sony 35 mm 1.4 g Master to the sigma 1.2? I have the 1.2 right now, and I absolutely love it but now I'm curious about the 1.4 g master.
Thanks, glad you liked the video. Yes, we're eager to get our hands on the Sony 35mm f/1.4, but I don't think we'll be able to get a copy until it's released. Comparing it to the Sigma f/1.2 is on our radar though, so keep any eye out for that video in the near future (hopefully).
Yes!! Thanks Tom!
You're welcome Scott, hope you liked it 👍
Hello, you do the best lens reviews !! I need an advice please. I have a Sigma 45mm 2.8 and will get a new lens for my Sigma FP Camera. I can't decide between Sigma 24mm F2 vs Sigma 35mm F2. 🙏🏼
Hey Tom… I’d like to see an update to this adding the Sigma 35 1.4 DG DN and even a comparison of the DG DN version vs. non-DG DN.
Already got you on that one brother: ua-cam.com/video/MqtgJ4gRQm4/v-deo.html
great, thanks so much. I love my f2 (more than the f1.8 sony lens). Grabbing and using it ist so much pleasure.
Thanks for watching, glad you enjoyed it 👍
Whats better? Sigma 35 f2 or sony 40 f2.5 ? :)
Great video! Can you do a comparison between the Sigma 35 f/2 and the Sony f/1.8
Thanks! More 35mm tests are on the way so those should be covered 👌
Great video! Please do some comparison between the F2, Sony 1.8 and Samyang 1.8. 🖤
Thanks for watching! We do have some plans to look at 35mm's again in the near future, so this could be on the cards for sure.
A bit late to the party, but the f2 is just awesomely great lens. A must have for a Sony Alpha camera. Very quick focus, dead silent (very pleasant tiny sound of the motor, asmr-like 😄), the feel of the metal shell is from another world.... A bit soft wide open, especially if you are used to the heavy Sony Zeiss/G master glass, but the softness is well compensated by the incredible contrast and the special loxia-style pop. I think it was actually designed to match the Loxia rendering. 🙂 Awesome, awesome, awesome lens 👍 Just perfect for a small full frame e-mount camera. Perfecto.
Should I buy the 35 1.4 or the 35 1.2? Is the 1.4 just as sharp?
I would be interested to see the same sort of comparison between the f2 and Sony's 35mm f1.8.
Thanks Chuck! More 35mm tests are on the cards soon, so keep an eye out for that! 👍
I prefer the size for now. I just bought Sigma 20 f2 and I really like this lens. For 35mm f1.2 I bought the manual lens Voigtlander.
Would the video af of the 1.4 see an equal improvement when stopped down to f2 as the 1.2? If so, that would be my pick
In theory, yes, but I can't say for certain as I haven't tested this specifically. Sorry I can't be more helpful!
Thanks for the comprehensive review Tom! If you ever get a chance, I'd love to see a comparison between the Sigma 85mm f1.4 DG DN vs the I series 65mm f2.0. I know this is an odd comparison but I'd be interested to see the difference in rendering between f1.4 and f2.0 at equivalent distances from the subject as well as when the subject is framed the same in the picture (i.e. how does the background blur and compression compare for headshots, full body, etc). 65mm is a super interesting but unfamiliar focal length haha.
Thanks for watching! Unfortunately I've sent the 65mm back to Sigma now, but I'll bare that in mind for future as it would be an interesting comparison. Thanks for your input 👍
@@TomCalton No worries, thanks for the reply!
Thanks for the great comparison video! I think the Sigma 35mm 1.2 DG DN is probably the best 35mm for full frame currently available - at least until the rumored Sony 35mm 1.4 GM (or a Canon 35mm 1.2 or 1.4 RF) is released 😎
Thanks Stefan. I agree. I just wish it wasn't so big and heavy (and it had a lock switch for the manual aperture ring, but I know that's not a big deal to some people). But I guess that's kinda unavoidable with a maximum aperture of f/1.2. Personally, I hope they remake the f/1.4 in a DG DN version.
My God, that is a lot of work you put into these videos. Thank you so much for these awesome reviews. ❤
My pleasure, I hope you enjoyed it!
nice video
I am deciding between F2 and F1.4 to bring it to the leica SL2-S
Thanks! I hope the video helped!
I will take the f2 for the SL2-S due to the fact that it is designed for mirrorless from the ground up rather than a converted DSLR lens which the 1.4 is. I am an L-mount shooter as well and I have both the S1R and the SL2-S. I currently have the Sigma 45mm f2 DGDN which is the same type of lens as the 35/2. I also have the 70mm Macro which is a converted DSLR lens like the 35/1.4 HSM. The DG DN lenses perform so much better in both S-AF, C-AF, and tracking with hardly any pulsing on both cameras which have the latest FW installed. I have also read other reviews that converted Sigma lenses doesn’t perform as well on the contrast detect AF of the L-mount alliance cameras which is the same as my experience.
@@junrobato4609 thank you brother
Like your videos. Thank you
Thanks for watching! 👍
The 35mm f2 wins hands down for one single reason: it's on your camera! I had the 35mm f1.2 and sold it as it's very heavy and bulky. At first, I thought the weight was manageable, sadly it was not.....I miss its rendering though!
Great video
Thanks Jeffrey, glad you enjoyed it!
@@TomCalton I love my sigma 35mm f1.2 that I use with my A7r iv and my A9 II.
what does the best for focus breathing and how do you deal with the focus by wire ?
Unfortunately we didn't test for focus breathing due to time constraints, so I don't have an answer for you there. The focus by wire system on the f/1.2 isn't great - the other two are much more responsive. I dive in to this topic much more in this video:
ua-cam.com/video/K8yuPxtyHSM/v-deo.html
@@TomCalton i wish The focus by wire system in all these new lens can just curl up and die I like the other focusing system way more wish these lens compys/ camera lesen to us.
The best!
No, YOU'RE the best! 😉
I had learned over the year in the photography world is sticking with OEM when come to lenses. Yes OEM is super expensive… but it worth every pennies !
Soo good how you take us with you to test these lenses. Already a big fan. Keep up the good content!
Thanks, really appreciate the kind words. Glad you enjoyed it!
I watched them all, Jason Vong, Jared Polin, Gearld Undone, Manny Ortiz and a few other channels that I had never heard of [but were equally well put together] and THIS video, i have to say was THEE ONE the truly helped me decide on the version of a 35mm that I will buy. Thank you for taking the time!
Wow Jorge, that's a huge compliment, thank you! Glad you found the video useful 🤜💥🤛
What is the point of the F2.0 ? Is the same price as the Sony F1.8 and the size is similar.
Before the f/2, Sigma only offered the f/1.4 and f/1.2, both of which are heavier and not really suitable for APS-C cameras. The f/2 fills that void and is also a great lightweight travel option for full frame cameras.
Ahhh, I was confused for a second I was like there’s a 35mm 1.2 lens?? How come I’ve never heard of it? But then the price was mentioned and it all came back to me.. 😅
Yeah, I know what you mean. If you don't mind selling your house to buy it though, it's a great lens 😅
Haha, all good things cost money💰 Take that back, most everything costs money good or not😆
I personally am going with the F2 as (after years of using old 1.4 primes) the “experience” shooting with a lens is now my leading factor. Obviously if anyone is considering these three, you’re considering three great options (so the question of sharpness etc - should be expected to be great)
I shot with the 1.2 and did it with a battery grip for a more “balanced” feel - I disagree that the 1.4 and (especially) 1.2 feel anything close to balanced on an a7 series body. Especially the mark 1 to mark III (except the siii thank you SONY)
IF your work justifies the 1.2, then you’ll have an INCREDIBLE tool to help create. If not, why deal with that huge brick tugging on the front of your camera?
The 1.4 is meant for DSLR and thus why bother with that option, especially when there are so many other 35mm options. (Albeit mostly at 1.8)
An interesting evaluation - thanks for sharing! I hope you enjoy the f/2 👍🏻
Did you get it finally ? And if so, do you see a big drop in quality ( in higher aperture ) ?
The exact comparison I have been waiting on for months! Thank you! For my A7Rii, I may go with the f2 since it’s newest, most compact and designed for mirrorless! Thank you again!
You're welcome! Glad you found it useful!
For me personally there is no reason that I would ever need anything brighter than f1.8
The concerts that I have shot have been just fine with it and the bokeh and background separation is already great. And for being such a nice compact 35mm, the F2 id definitely be taking with me to more places.
My conclusion of All this. Sigma should Do a redone 35mm 1.4 dgdn. This lens would be more affordable than the 1.2 and sigma could get rid of All the little shortcomings of the other lenses.
I couldn't agree with you more! 👏
It's being rumoured! Actually, it will be announced soon!
They heared Out prayers. Nice
there was a firmware update on the 1.2 :)
Yeah there was, but this lens didn't have the new firmware update, so still no idea why it performed better this time around 🤷♂️
Great video but can we talk about that shirt? Wheres my yes fam at?
Over here bro 🙌💪
see notification ! enter! thats it. simple things :D
Haha! Thanks for watching!
Strange test. The cheapest lens won the price performance categories and the expensive f1.2 won the image quality tests. By examination of the scores, the f1.4 is three times worse than the f2 and the f1.2. The purpose of a lens is to faithfully reproduce a scene, possibly with special effects like bokeh, isolating the subject. Perhaps the true summary might be "you get what you pay for, so pick what your budget allows." I think the purpose of the lens is also important. You won't take a lot of landscapes below f2. If you are doing portrait glamor shots, a fast aperture can be of value. So besides "what's my budget?" we might also ask, "what's it for ?". Even so, an interesting review.
better use the scoring as 5/5 stars scale, because 1.2 costs double the 1.4
Not sure how that would help? The 1.2 didn't get a point for price because it's so expensive, but the other two did.
In my opinion the f1.4 wins. the f1.2 is just to big and heavy, and the smaller lens is f2.
I think it's the best compromise for exactly the reasons you've stated. I just hope Sigma bring out a revised version soon that offers improved image quality (sharper and no CA) 🤞
You Brit’s put an R in certain words. I hear “BOKER”
I thought the 1.4 had the best bokeh haha
And you can pick it up used $350 all day
😂
I hope that means you like the video. Or are you just laughing at my stupid face? 😅
@@TomCalton funny conclusions but I understand is your opinions...
Love the reviews, but always cringe at when you say 'Bow-Cuh' please look up the pronunciation, as youtuber you have an influence on others as well. Thanks
i prefer watching your video at 1.5× speed cause ur kinda slow
Cool story bro