CC, GU. G'day from Sydney gentlemen. Loved your colab. On a practical note, have vicariously 'auditioned' a lot of gear via your* reviews - steered me in the right direction for my children's streaming aspirations, thank you. Keep up the great work. *And the usual suspects, EposVox et al.
I use an iD22 for voice work, the ability to completely physically bypass the preamps was the deciding factor. This lets me use an external mic preamp of my choosing (Avalon M5). A lot of these interfaces only disable the internal preamp gain, but route an externally amplified signal through the internal preamp circuits. The iD22 lets you completely bypass the preamp circuitry entirely. It's one of those "probably marginal increases in quality" things ...
"I don't fancy myself an audiophile or professional" My ass! You're that and much more. Your standards, and insight here are second to none. Well done.
One of the best comprehensive and honest reviews I have seen in a while. As I got back into music, I was on an intro/broke-producer-budget, just trying to see if I was serious again, so I got a Behringer. It served it's purpose, especially for the price, but as I upgrade other things, Audient gear has come highly recommended. I have a small home studio. I went to check out a friend at his studio. 23 years in the business, he turned a full 2 car garage into a home studio. A lot of top of the line equipment. I sat down to check out his everyday work "interface", it's an Evo 8. I look at him and he says, " Trust me, get you one. I use it more for recording, than I do my high dollar equipment". This video is helping with my decision. Thanks!
ON the voice I hear a minor difference, although I’m willing to bet that’s due to minor variances in the proximity to the mic. The guitar on the ID4 had a more well defined high end. On the piano, the evo 4 sounded ever so slightly muddier in the low mids. Very close, and for $120 or $130, the evo 4 is quite impressive.
Eyy Podcastage I like your stuff.Watching to get advice on buying audio equipment.i do wish in your reviews you would mention problems that can be encountered with certain interfaces lol
I'm an audio engineer (for whatever that's worth in Internet Land), and the main difference I hear on voice was definitely a variation in mic placement. It almost sounded like the mic was in a different part of the room between the two recordings. The line inputs and the DI comparisons were more fair. I agree, it's definitely splitting hairs, especially in this segment of the interface market. Microphones, in particular, are where a would-be recordist should sink more of their money, all things being equal.
Thanks Gerald. Great review. I've been looking for this head-to-head comparison. As much as I'd like 2 XLR inputs and loopback, your review has helped me decide in favor of the ID4. For me, sound quality is key and the ID4 has a richer, fuller sound. Thanks again.
@@konpadelic In the end I changed my mind, because I need the other features - especially the loopback, and I like that there's the potential for firmware updates. I'm really impressed with the preamp in the EVO 4. It sounds great. Did you get the ID4?
I just noticed, the EVO 4 uses USB C for power. That's awesome!! Great video as always Gerald 😁. It's like you read my mind, I was looking for an audio interface 😂👍🏻.
I’ve already watched tons of reviews of this tryna figure out if I want it, but I’m so glad you’re covering it too. Your reviews are so comprehensive and easy to understand
timings and appreciatons (on my akg 240) guitar riff 2:34 id4 2:40 evo 4 -> id4 has a clearer sound solo 3:04 evo 4 3:08 id4 -> id4 has a clearer sound piano 3:24 evo 4 3:31 id4 ->no difference
I actually also listened with DT770s and completely agree with your opinion on the sound difference. Especially on the warmth of the guitar. Personally that was almost nice enough on the iD4 to make the whole decision for me but that is only a small part of my use case which is primarily cello and keyboard based.
I waited for this comparison. Thank you! To me the mic sounds more neutral and detailed with the id4, while the evo4 has slightly boosted lows and highs. Using a set of beyerdynamic T1
I own the Audient ID14 and its just been treating me wonderfully. I use a pair of 250 ohm DT770s and they power up them easily. The quality is also incredible. I never would've gotten an Audient Interface if someone didn't recommend it to me over the scarlett. I have no regrets at all.
Let’s be honest they are both great, just pick your price which isn’t a lot really, was impressed with the instrument inputs in both, to my ears the piano sounded richer on the evo, guitar and vocals equal to my ears anyway. Form wise I prefer the iD4 but then I’m old and enjoy metal and LED’s.
Listening to the differences on very decent set up with analytical headphones - the ID 4 seems more balanced across the frequency range with a bit more detail in the higher frequencies vs the Evo, which seems to have more of a bump in the low mid's giving the Evo a "warmer" tone. I actually prefer the sound of the Evo but I think the ID 4 is probably more accurate when it comes to music production and mixing. The differences aren't night and day but they are there - both are great entry level interfaces imho - I used to own the ID 14 and it punches well above it's price - I don't think you can go wrong with either of these at this price - hope this helps :)
I wish the EVO 4 would have the mic and guitar input on the front with all the controls and xlr outputs etc directly in the back, so the knob faces you and outputs are directly behind it, would look much nicer in my opinion.
Audient definitely has the some of the best preamps and A/D converters out there in the lower end interfaces. The ID14 is certainly comparable to a lot of the sub 1000 dollar units. And the ID4 is pretty similar just with less I/O. The ID22 however is one I suggest staying away from. They tend to stop working after a year or two and overheat. I've seen tons and tons of people on here as well as forums complaining about it. Audient has never come out and addressed these issues either so I can't say if they ever fixed them or not. I was going to spring for the ID14 a few months back but ended up getting an Apollo Twin for the plugins. But I definitely would choose it over the 2i2 I've been using for a few years.
Donna Wilson I watched this video with audio run through an amp into classic 80’s tower speakers. I felt like the EVO had slightly more warmth on the reading and with the guitar, and the piano sounded indistinguishable. To me the differences I did hear sounded like they would be a choice of taste, but my taste ran toward the EVO
Wow this is super comprehensive, great review. though i'm still undecided on which of the two I'll go with, it's great to know both are fantastic interfaces.
I am a singer and looking for my first audio interface for vocal recordings(Note : I have a non-treated room) and I am confused between the following: 1. Focusrite Solo 3rd Gen 2. Audient Evo4 3. Audient ID4 4. Focusrite 2i2 3rd gen One of my known producers told me to at least keep 2 xlr inputs just for a safer side that in case one stops working. What do you suggest?
My friends that study music also told me to have at least two audio inputs so I delete the solo 3rd gen and for the money I was between the 2i2 vs evo 4 but since my friends have pro audient units plus the 2i2 it's close (talking in price) to the id4 (30 dollar difference) I went for the evo 4, I really like it and it's sooo portable that it can fit on any pocket of my backpack
The SSL2 once release will easily be the best audio interface for its money. The thing is incredible value and the 4k preamp switch on an SM7b sounds like a dream!
Yeah, the SSL2 looks great. Not sure about putting the headphone jack in the back, but other than that, it looks awesome. What does the 4k preamp switch do? Not familiar with that.
@@geraldundone I agree with the headphone jack on the back. Not a great location. My workaround if I upgrade my old interface would be to route an aux extension under my desk and mount it under at the front. That might even be a cleaner setup than having it run over your desktop. The 4k switch adds some harmonic distortion in the higher frequencies. Adds a bit of hype to the mix. I believe it emulates Solid State Logic's old, legendary 4000 series console. I highly suggest Podcastage's review over the unit! He tests it on quite a few mics and compares it to the Motu M2 as well.
I have the SSL2 and it’s stunning quality for the price. The 4k is great for adding some zing, a really nice touch. I have the Apollo twin set up here too, it’s a tough call which I’d go with if I had to chose based on pure audio quality. The SSL preamps and converters seem of the highest calibre. Remarkable given the price.
- Has the native ability to record desktop audio - Has the native ability to record in mono rather than stereo - The XLR input's at the back - Set and forget your gain level with the Smart Gain function Then pile those up with an insanely clean and quiet preamp? This is everything I wanted from interfaces from the very beginning. The Evo 4 is an Insta-buy from me.
The guitar sounded a bit better on the iD4 but it really is close enough, especially if you're mainly using a mic. I actually looked away on purpose and didn't realize it switched on the vocals! But the iD4 does have a very "warm tube" sound to that D.I.
I just have to say, you are really talented. Great video, great voice, and great detail! So I have the GoXLR Mini, but dislike it due to the lack of XLR inputs. Would the EVO 8 be a good replacement, or a great addition to the GoXLR Mini? Thanks man.
Room treatment is much more important than mic pres/interface or mics. There is some very obvious boxy frequency resonance on both vocal tracks needing for a surgical eq.
I thought the ID4 had a little better harmonic content and had a little more neutrality. I thought the Evo 4 might have actually sounded a little better on the your voice. Two XLR jacks does give the Evo an advantage for some applications. I think the Evo wins this one because of price. But I'd be more interested in seeing a comparison with the Evo and the new Mark ii ID series.
The guitar was sounding so good on the ID4 that I wouldn't either mix it that much, I'm so impressed for that price, and I've heard the difference even only on the speaker of my iPhone 7, I have to watch this video again with headphones
The fan of the 300d II was running, but usually it's not too bad. This video though has the Shogun 7 running too and I think that might have been more pronounced. It's a noisy boy.
Tbh, I had to be really keen to find a difference. I found the vocals to be quite similar, guitar to be better on iD4, and piano to be better on EVO 4. I'm an aspiring guitarist and I think I would go with iD4.
Some needs to explain the looking to the right thing to me at the start of the videos. What do we think Gerald needs to see to the right before mustering the courage to repeat his catchphrase? I just gotta know.
"Best budget Audio Interface" : starts at 129usd. Just took a look at my 30usd Behringer Audio Interface and laughed! Budget is a funny word. Loved the detailed review.
@@panelsandbars UM2 is the cheapest one and UMC22 is what I have. Looking at the US prices now, it looks like the prices have increased significantly. Probably due to China import regulations. I bought mine from Germany a year and a half back.
I use the ID4 a lot. I even use the ID4 as a preamp before the camera without a iPhone or MPB as the DAW, and just go straight from the output to the input of the camera. There’s a slight decrease in quality using the GH5 converters, but I can’t really hear it unless I’m in my studio. Side note, and the irony is enjoyable, I like the sound of the ID4 over the UA Apollo Twin Duo. Better converters!
For a bit of long term experience as well: between myself and a few people I know, 4/5 Audient iD4 have failed in some way either in a few months or in a year or two. Just a word of caution to those looking to buy it, Audient took 10 weeks to solve my issue, so their support isn't the greatest either. I now own an iD14, no major issues so far... knock on wood. Additionally, I'd also want to add that the iD4 uses the same console preamp DESIGN as their high end consoles, not everything is the same under the hood.
Great video! I'm in a dilemma if I keep or replace my UMC204HD with an Audient id14 or Motu m2...The Behringer has many features and good bang for the buck if you compare it to the others, but the output gain is kinda low (although they can drive my DT 990's, I think the sound is lacking some bass)
Valandized I just switched from the 204hd to the evo 4 the only thing I miss is the ability to control the volume of both my monitors and headphones I forgot how convenient that was. But I’m happily sticking with the evo because my output both headphones and monitors sounds clearer as for the mic preamps... the Midas ones vs the evo 4 I would say isn’t far off sounds different but both maintain clear clarity the evo 4 sounds a little warmer, but the 204hd slightly just ever so slightly clearer. Oh the hardware isn’t as well made as the 204s those feel way more durable. You’ll definitely notice that. If you like manual control. And don’t care too much about headphone output and monitor playing at same time. Stick to the 204 but for me definitely the evo 4. Or I’ve heard rumours of the coming soon evo 8 not having that issue of auto muting. So maybe. Hold another month it’s not that much more, at least not in U.K.
@@sharma673 Thanks for the feedback Sharma! Actually, I do like all those nice features and multiple outputs on the 204HD, which is why I've been holding back for such a long time. Since I got my DT990's I must say I'm not quite satisfied with the sound output of the headphone amp. For this reason I've started looking around for something better, but not too expensive and with comparable features. I haven't found a replacement yet, not a cheap one at least. I saw a video about the Motu M2 having one of the best headphone amps, on top of good mic pre-amps. Do you know if the Evo 8 will be comparable to the 204HD?
Valandized Hey y/w in terms of inputs yes but in terms of usability and individual dials I’m afraid not. At least not until a newer version of the 204hd comes out which I have no idea when. But I completely agree with headphone output. Personally that’s the only issue I’ve had with the 204hd. I know that focusrite can power the dt 770 and 990 just fine but the Midas preamps sounds way better than focusrite. This was the reason why I went with the evo 4. As much as I prefer manual dials and love my Behringer. What matters most was input and output. For better mixing balancing and fine tuning even if I have to press one too many dials. I do want the evo 8 though for one main reason. It has two headphone outputs great for recording artist whilst monitoring. Let me know if you come across a Behringer competitor for the price. ☺️
Just out of curiosity! can you put d-brand skin on the id4, though the housing is strong the paint comes off very easy... and it's doesn't look good at all😞😞
Good! I have windows 10 x64b, amd Phenom tm IIx4 955 Processor 3.20 ghz 8 gm Ram, and I use Ableton live 10. Will I have a problem with the Audient ID14?
audient makes always awesome stuff! I love evo4's simple appearance and quality of sounds. Hope you can get a MOTU M2 and get a chance to compare to audient stuff. Thanks. I'm considering buying MOTU M2 which is overestimated than audient product.
I’ve considered both for a purchase and was leaning towards the Evo 4, but the ID4 sounded a bit better in all examples, especially the guitar. But, the ID4 isn’t iOS compatible. Argh. Good review!
Hi Gerald, amazing review. I'm set on the ID4. Do you have any info if it's going to remain supported for Apple devices in the coming years? Support-wise, the newer EVO 4 would seem a safer bet, if it isn't for the lack sturdiness and durability. Which one would you recommend for the long-term (5 years or more)? Thanks!
EVO4 headphone out picks up a lot of wifi chatter, noise and ticking, you can turn wifi off on your computer but then if someone's phone gets active the chatter returns. Also the fact the EVO headphone out mutes the speaker outs is a killer, talking of which, the DACs are rather flat on the EVO4, too filtered, quite poor to my ears (not sure if the ID4 speakers out are better though?) Sent my EVO4 back.
I mean this in the most amicable way possible. You really need a dbx 286s or some sort of analog noise gate. Lot’s room noise/hum in your mix. This will take care of the room noise before it reaches your interface and eliminate the need to edit it out in post. Cheers.🍻
To my ears (using a set of Shure SRH440 cans driven by an Audient iD14), the voice sounded virtually identical. I liked the guitar better through the iD4. I liked the keyboard through the Evo.
I can't decide between the EVO-4, Motu M2, or the M-Audio Air 192/6! I think I'm certain about midi I/O but, how necessary is it for sequencers/synthesizers?
Have you seen the Motu M2? I've got one on order and what I'm seeing looks great to me. I'd be interested in your input on that setup if you can get your hands on one.
You are lying. You are not just an enthusiast. You are the most genius tech nerd professional with exceptional explaining skills on earth. Period.
I sang the perfect camera song in the Audient iD14 :) I went with that over the Focusrite for those famous Audient preamps.
Nice! There's an accolade and a half! 😜 (It's a great theme song!)
CC, GU. G'day from Sydney gentlemen. Loved your colab.
On a practical note, have vicariously 'auditioned' a lot of gear via your* reviews - steered me in the right direction for my children's streaming aspirations, thank you. Keep up the great work.
*And the usual suspects, EposVox et al.
That's all I needed to hear to make my decision.
iD14 is King. Sound quality of the Universal Audio and other super expansive interfaces but less than half the price.
I use an iD22 for voice work, the ability to completely physically bypass the preamps was the deciding factor. This lets me use an external mic preamp of my choosing (Avalon M5). A lot of these interfaces only disable the internal preamp gain, but route an externally amplified signal through the internal preamp circuits. The iD22 lets you completely bypass the preamp circuitry entirely. It's one of those "probably marginal increases in quality" things ...
"I don't fancy myself an audiophile or professional"
My ass! You're that and much more. Your standards, and insight here are second to none. Well done.
One of the best comprehensive and honest reviews I have seen in a while. As I got back into music, I was on an intro/broke-producer-budget, just trying to see if I was serious again, so I got a Behringer. It served it's purpose, especially for the price, but as I upgrade other things, Audient gear has come highly recommended. I have a small home studio. I went to check out a friend at his studio. 23 years in the business, he turned a full 2 car garage into a home studio. A lot of top of the line equipment. I sat down to check out his everyday work "interface", it's an Evo 8. I look at him and he says, " Trust me, get you one. I use it more for recording, than I do my high dollar equipment". This video is helping with my decision. Thanks!
ON the voice I hear a minor difference, although I’m willing to bet that’s due to minor variances in the proximity to the mic. The guitar on the ID4 had a more well defined high end. On the piano, the evo 4 sounded ever so slightly muddier in the low mids. Very close, and for $120 or $130, the evo 4 is quite impressive.
Thanks for chiming in! :)
Eyy Podcastage I like your stuff.Watching to get advice on buying audio equipment.i do wish in your reviews you would mention problems that can be encountered with certain interfaces lol
Podcastage which do you prefer for baritone voice. SSL 2 or ID4. Maybe do a comparison video
i just bought the Evo 4 and what a difference it makes to my Focusrite. huge difference
I'm an audio engineer (for whatever that's worth in Internet Land), and the main difference I hear on voice was definitely a variation in mic placement. It almost sounded like the mic was in a different part of the room between the two recordings. The line inputs and the DI comparisons were more fair. I agree, it's definitely splitting hairs, especially in this segment of the interface market. Microphones, in particular, are where a would-be recordist should sink more of their money, all things being equal.
Thanks Gerald. Great review. I've been looking for this head-to-head comparison.
As much as I'd like 2 XLR inputs and loopback, your review has helped me decide in favor of the ID4.
For me, sound quality is key and the ID4 has a richer, fuller sound.
Thanks again.
me too
@@konpadelic In the end I changed my mind, because I need the other features - especially the loopback, and I like that there's the potential for firmware updates.
I'm really impressed with the preamp in the EVO 4. It sounds great.
Did you get the ID4?
I just noticed, the EVO 4 uses USB C for power. That's awesome!!
Great video as always Gerald 😁. It's like you read my mind, I was looking for an audio interface 😂👍🏻.
I’ve already watched tons of reviews of this tryna figure out if I want it, but I’m so glad you’re covering it too. Your reviews are so comprehensive and easy to understand
I've got an Audient ID4, its pretty good - the dual headphone ports have been useful for me
timings and appreciatons (on my akg 240)
guitar riff
2:34 id4
2:40 evo 4
-> id4 has a clearer sound
solo
3:04 evo 4
3:08 id4
-> id4 has a clearer sound
piano
3:24 evo 4
3:31 id4
->no difference
I actually also listened with DT770s and completely agree with your opinion on the sound difference. Especially on the warmth of the guitar. Personally that was almost nice enough on the iD4 to make the whole decision for me but that is only a small part of my use case which is primarily cello and keyboard based.
I waited for this comparison. Thank you!
To me the mic sounds more neutral and detailed with the id4, while the evo4 has slightly boosted lows and highs.
Using a set of beyerdynamic T1
Nice Californication solo :)
251 minor voicings that heal aids
I had no idea you were so good at guitar and piano! Sounds great
Merci beaucoup pour cette critique honnête et précise.
I own the Audient ID14 and its just been treating me wonderfully. I use a pair of 250 ohm DT770s and they power up them easily. The quality is also incredible. I never would've gotten an Audient Interface if someone didn't recommend it to me over the scarlett. I have no regrets at all.
just found mint shape used EVO4 and snatched it up right away after watching this. Brilliantly thorough comparison. Thanks!
Perfect timing! I happen to be on the market for one. Thanks Garald!
I'm a new Audient iD4 user. And I concur with what he says about the iD4. It's a solid underrated, sleeper gear.
This came at a good time, I've been tempted by Focusrite for a while but interested by the EVO 4 now. More research to be done!
Which one did you pull the plug on then finally ?
Next intro, say: "What's done *can* be undone"
hey thanks man, i was breaking my head to decide which interface to buy at all. you made my work easy in a snap. cheers!
Let’s be honest they are both great, just pick your price which isn’t a lot really, was impressed with the instrument inputs in both, to my ears the piano sounded richer on the evo, guitar and vocals equal to my ears anyway. Form wise I prefer the iD4 but then I’m old and enjoy metal and LED’s.
Listening to the differences on very decent set up with analytical headphones - the ID 4 seems more balanced across the frequency range with a bit more detail in the higher frequencies vs the Evo, which seems to have more of a bump in the low mid's giving the Evo a "warmer" tone. I actually prefer the sound of the Evo but I think the ID 4 is probably more accurate when it comes to music production and mixing. The differences aren't night and day but they are there - both are great entry level interfaces imho - I used to own the ID 14 and it punches well above it's price - I don't think you can go wrong with either of these at this price - hope this helps :)
I wish the EVO 4 would have the mic and guitar input on the front with all the controls and xlr outputs etc directly in the back, so the knob faces you and outputs are directly behind it, would look much nicer in my opinion.
Audient definitely has the some of the best preamps and A/D converters out there in the lower end interfaces. The ID14 is certainly comparable to a lot of the sub 1000 dollar units. And the ID4 is pretty similar just with less I/O. The ID22 however is one I suggest staying away from. They tend to stop working after a year or two and overheat. I've seen tons and tons of people on here as well as forums complaining about it. Audient has never come out and addressed these issues either so I can't say if they ever fixed them or not. I was going to spring for the ID14 a few months back but ended up getting an Apollo Twin for the plugins. But I definitely would choose it over the 2i2 I've been using for a few years.
hmm weird I have 2 id22 in two different set ups and never experienced it, not even overheating
wow, i love your review so thoroughly on both devices
Can't go wrong with the sound on either... I got the ID14 for expandability... and the mixer software is great for the ID14...
Awesome comparison. Personally, I felt piano seemed more dynamic in id4 . Great video.
Donna Wilson
I watched this video with audio run through an amp into classic 80’s tower speakers. I felt like the EVO had slightly more warmth on the reading and with the guitar, and the piano sounded indistinguishable. To me the differences I did hear sounded like they would be a choice of taste, but my taste ran toward the EVO
Agree and they are both from the same company, so its a win win. The automatic setting adjustments on the EVO could be very useful for some.
I almost pulled the trigger on the older audient model but went with the Yamaha AG03. Not going to lie, that EVO 4 looks sexy.
I've got an active bid on an evo4 on ebay so I'm pleased it has a good wrap cheers
That's a nice little box... I don't have anything to route audio now and this seems to hit all the right buttons.
Wow this is super comprehensive, great review. though i'm still undecided on which of the two I'll go with, it's great to know both are fantastic interfaces.
Wow Glad I found your video, I was about to pull the trigger for the Focusrite 2i2, until I saw the EVO. Thanks!
I am a singer and looking for my first audio interface for vocal recordings(Note : I have a non-treated room) and I am confused between the following:
1. Focusrite Solo 3rd Gen
2. Audient Evo4
3. Audient ID4
4. Focusrite 2i2 3rd gen
One of my known producers told me to at least keep 2 xlr inputs just for a safer side that in case one stops working. What do you suggest?
My friends that study music also told me to have at least two audio inputs so I delete the solo 3rd gen and for the money I was between the 2i2 vs evo 4 but since my friends have pro audient units plus the 2i2 it's close (talking in price) to the id4 (30 dollar difference) I went for the evo 4, I really like it and it's sooo portable that it can fit on any pocket of my backpack
@@wilfredomendoza5440 thank you for this man🌼
in-depth af just how i like it - subbed
Gerald playing music is so soothing
Late to this video party. I LOVE my Audient ID14 ... am considering upgrading to the 44 as I would love 2 more inputs. Cheers!
Super dope.. can you please do a comparison with the evo8 or is the evo4 just it ..
very well done ------ excellent production values
That's a damn great review/comparison, thank you
That RHCP throwback
i personally have an Audient ID4 with my Shure sm7b and some dutch preamp and it sound phenomenal for the price
RHCP guitar solo right there. HAHA love this review! Thank you!
Great comparison. FYI the Evo 4 does have a clip light - the channel light will flicker orange when it’s clipping.
The SSL2 once release will easily be the best audio interface for its money. The thing is incredible value and the 4k preamp switch on an SM7b sounds like a dream!
That being said, before the Motu and SSL 2, the audient was always my recommendation for anything in the $200-$400 range
Yeah, the SSL2 looks great. Not sure about putting the headphone jack in the back, but other than that, it looks awesome. What does the 4k preamp switch do? Not familiar with that.
@@geraldundone
I agree with the headphone jack on the back. Not a great location. My workaround if I upgrade my old interface would be to route an aux extension under my desk and mount it under at the front. That might even be a cleaner setup than having it run over your desktop.
The 4k switch adds some harmonic distortion in the higher frequencies. Adds a bit of hype to the mix. I believe it emulates Solid State Logic's old, legendary 4000 series console.
I highly suggest Podcastage's review over the unit! He tests it on quite a few mics and compares it to the Motu M2 as well.
I have the SSL2 and it’s stunning quality for the price. The 4k is great for adding some zing, a really nice touch. I have the Apollo twin set up here too, it’s a tough call which I’d go with if I had to chose based on pure audio quality. The SSL preamps and converters seem of the highest calibre. Remarkable given the price.
- Has the native ability to record desktop audio
- Has the native ability to record in mono rather than stereo
- The XLR input's at the back
- Set and forget your gain level with the Smart Gain function
Then pile those up with an insanely clean and quiet preamp? This is everything I wanted from interfaces from the very beginning. The Evo 4 is an Insta-buy from me.
Great review Man!!
They both sound the same.
You’re very professional with your content love it👍
The guitar sounded a bit better on the iD4 but it really is close enough, especially if you're mainly using a mic. I actually looked away on purpose and didn't realize it switched on the vocals! But the iD4 does have a very "warm tube" sound to that D.I.
Love your videos! Thank you for the great info
As always, great job Thanks Gerald
Great comparison vid man
You always provide informative review... kudos bud!
Do you have a suggestion for a simpler set-up.. let’s say if i want to screen record my ipad zoom call for my classes.. and capture the audio?
Personally have gone down the path of the MOTU M2 and/or Focusrite Scarlet 2i2 that price out between these two. Thank you as always for the video.
I recently bough the ID4 and i love it!
Hi, how is the latency?
@@takaa01 I dont know. It does not really matter to me since i record voiceover works with one microphone, nothing more.
Enjoying your videos. If you only needed the interface for voiceover and video, would these still be the interfaces you recommend?
I just have to say, you are really talented. Great video, great voice, and great detail!
So I have the GoXLR Mini, but dislike it due to the lack of XLR inputs. Would the EVO 8 be a good replacement, or a great addition to the GoXLR Mini? Thanks man.
Room treatment is much more important than mic pres/interface or mics. There is some very obvious boxy frequency resonance on both vocal tracks needing for a surgical eq.
Great video, Gerald!
Great review and nice piano playing 😊 I personally use focurite solo for my voiceover, and I think it's very good.
I Got That Now Imma Upgrade To The Audient
I thought the ID4 had a little better harmonic content and had a little more neutrality. I thought the Evo 4 might have actually sounded a little better on the your voice. Two XLR jacks does give the Evo an advantage for some applications. I think the Evo wins this one because of price. But I'd be more interested in seeing a comparison with the Evo and the new Mark ii ID series.
The mark i and the mrkii sound the same if i have usb2.0?
Now this is what I was craving.
The guitar was sounding so good on the ID4 that I wouldn't either mix it that much, I'm so impressed for that price, and I've heard the difference even only on the speaker of my iPhone 7, I have to watch this video again with headphones
Excellent, thank you. I was waiting for someone to do this comparison :) Side question - is it the Aputure light fans we can hear in the background?
The fan of the 300d II was running, but usually it's not too bad. This video though has the Shogun 7 running too and I think that might have been more pronounced. It's a noisy boy.
Tbh, I had to be really keen to find a difference. I found the vocals to be quite similar, guitar to be better on iD4, and piano to be better on EVO 4. I'm an aspiring guitarist and I think I would go with iD4.
Would love to see you do a review of the best OSS lenses. Cheers
Great video man! What mic did you used to record your voice?
More audio gear reviews please!!
Some needs to explain the looking to the right thing to me at the start of the videos. What do we think Gerald needs to see to the right before mustering the courage to repeat his catchphrase? I just gotta know.
What's happening booth junkers???? lol
Very informative video!
Excellent video ! Thank you
"Best budget Audio Interface" : starts at 129usd. Just took a look at my 30usd Behringer Audio Interface and laughed!
Budget is a funny word. Loved the detailed review.
Do you mind if I ask the model number/name?
@@panelsandbars UM2 is the cheapest one and UMC22 is what I have. Looking at the US prices now, it looks like the prices have increased significantly. Probably due to China import regulations. I bought mine from Germany a year and a half back.
Arda Celik I appreciate it, thank you. 😊
is yours better/much better than what Gerald is reviewing?
@@guerrerosdigitales worse
Perfect video bro! Thanks!
Audient has some serious well known qualityissues with their interfaces, especially the ID22 that is worth to read up on before purchase
thank you for a detailed review
“Hi I’m Gerald Undone y estoy re loco”
I use the ID4 a lot. I even use the ID4 as a preamp before the camera without a iPhone or MPB as the DAW, and just go straight from the output to the input of the camera. There’s a slight decrease in quality using the GH5 converters, but I can’t really hear it unless I’m in my studio. Side note, and the irony is enjoyable, I like the sound of the ID4 over the UA Apollo Twin Duo. Better converters!
For a bit of long term experience as well: between myself and a few people I know, 4/5 Audient iD4 have failed in some way either in a few months or in a year or two. Just a word of caution to those looking to buy it, Audient took 10 weeks to solve my issue, so their support isn't the greatest either. I now own an iD14, no major issues so far... knock on wood. Additionally, I'd also want to add that the iD4 uses the same console preamp DESIGN as their high end consoles, not everything is the same under the hood.
Hey just curious, is your id14 still working OK?
Great video! I'm in a dilemma if I keep or replace my UMC204HD with an Audient id14 or Motu m2...The Behringer has many features and good bang for the buck if you compare it to the others, but the output gain is kinda low (although they can drive my DT 990's, I think the sound is lacking some bass)
Valandized I just switched from the 204hd to the evo 4 the only thing I miss is the ability to control the volume of both my monitors and headphones I forgot how convenient that was. But I’m happily sticking with the evo because my output both headphones and monitors sounds clearer as for the mic preamps... the Midas ones vs the evo 4 I would say isn’t far off sounds different but both maintain clear clarity the evo 4 sounds a little warmer, but the 204hd slightly just ever so slightly clearer. Oh the hardware isn’t as well made as the 204s those feel way more durable. You’ll definitely notice that. If you like manual control. And don’t care too much about headphone output and monitor playing at same time. Stick to the 204 but for me definitely the evo 4. Or I’ve heard rumours of the coming soon evo 8 not having that issue of auto muting. So maybe. Hold another month it’s not that much more, at least not in U.K.
@@sharma673 Thanks for the feedback Sharma! Actually, I do like all those nice features and multiple outputs on the 204HD, which is why I've been holding back for such a long time. Since I got my DT990's I must say I'm not quite satisfied with the sound output of the headphone amp. For this reason I've started looking around for something better, but not too expensive and with comparable features. I haven't found a replacement yet, not a cheap one at least. I saw a video about the Motu M2 having one of the best headphone amps, on top of good mic pre-amps. Do you know if the Evo 8 will be comparable to the 204HD?
Valandized Hey y/w in terms of inputs yes but in terms of usability and individual dials I’m afraid not. At least not until a newer version of the 204hd comes out which I have no idea when. But I completely agree with headphone output. Personally that’s the only issue I’ve had with the 204hd. I know that focusrite can power the dt 770 and 990 just fine but the Midas preamps sounds way better than focusrite. This was the reason why I went with the evo 4. As much as I prefer manual dials and love my Behringer. What matters most was input and output. For better mixing balancing and fine tuning even if I have to press one too many dials. I do want the evo 8 though for one main reason. It has two headphone outputs great for recording artist whilst monitoring. Let me know if you come across a Behringer competitor for the price. ☺️
excellent job dude, thx much!
Just out of curiosity! can you put d-brand skin on the id4, though the housing is strong the paint comes off very easy... and it's doesn't look good at all😞😞
Good! I have windows 10 x64b, amd Phenom tm IIx4 955 Processor 3.20 ghz
8 gm Ram, and I use Ableton live 10. Will I have a problem with the Audient ID14?
audient makes always awesome stuff! I love evo4's simple appearance and quality of sounds. Hope you can get a MOTU M2 and get a chance to compare to audient stuff. Thanks. I'm considering buying MOTU M2 which is overestimated than audient product.
Wow Very Detailed Review...
Got it now 1 month. Works great.
I’ve considered both for a purchase and was leaning towards the Evo 4, but the ID4 sounded a bit better in all examples, especially the guitar. But, the ID4 isn’t iOS compatible. Argh. Good review!
Hi Gerald, amazing review.
I'm set on the ID4. Do you have any info if it's going to remain supported for Apple devices in the coming years?
Support-wise, the newer EVO 4 would seem a safer bet, if it isn't for the lack sturdiness and durability.
Which one would you recommend for the long-term (5 years or more)?
Thanks!
looking forward to trying this product, new to producing so can use quality equipment...
You had to play all these instruments to make me feel even more worthless?? LOLL just kidding.
So love your content man.
EVO4 headphone out picks up a lot of wifi chatter, noise and ticking, you can turn wifi off on your computer but then if someone's phone gets active the chatter returns.
Also the fact the EVO headphone out mutes the speaker outs is a killer, talking of which, the DACs are rather flat on the EVO4, too filtered, quite poor to my ears (not sure if the ID4 speakers out are better though?)
Sent my EVO4 back.
evo is def more muddy with the low mid and below, with m30x headphones it was very clear in my perspective
I mean this in the most amicable way possible. You really need a dbx 286s or some sort of analog noise gate. Lot’s room noise/hum in your mix. This will take care of the room noise before it reaches your interface and eliminate the need to edit it out in post. Cheers.🍻
The ID4 is a bit more forward in the upper mids vs the evo4. More low end on the evo. Both sound great!
Yeah the only reason I went with the ID4 is basically just because of the Layout and functionality of everything.
To my ears (using a set of Shure SRH440 cans driven by an Audient iD14), the voice sounded virtually identical. I liked the guitar better through the iD4. I liked the keyboard through the Evo.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts! :)
Enjoyed your review, however I use a Behringer Xenyx QX1002USB with my iMac Pro. Seems to work pretty well.
Your audio in this video sounds nice and crisp. You using something new?
I can't decide between the EVO-4, Motu M2, or the M-Audio Air 192/6! I think I'm certain about midi I/O but, how necessary is it for sequencers/synthesizers?
Have you seen the Motu M2? I've got one on order and what I'm seeing looks great to me. I'd be interested in your input on that setup if you can get your hands on one.
Just photos. I like the LCD screen and the price is nice.