This POWERFUL Sudoku Strategy Can Solve 18 Cells!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 26

  • @SmartHobbies
    @SmartHobbies  19 днів тому +2

    📕Get my FREE Solving Guide that will help you solve over 80% of all Sudoku puzzles🧩to include NYT Hard👉👉www.buymeacoffee.com/timberlakeB/e/125822
    Timestamps
    0:00 Intro
    00:19 It’s Solving Time
    00:30 Puzzle Story
    01:40 BONUS Tip
    04:20 Solving Trick
    05:06 QOD
    06:22 Solving Tip
    07:43 Setting Up Powerful Strategy
    10:45 Powerful Strategy Revealed
    14:14 Solving 18 Cells At One Time

  • @AnonimityAssured
    @AnonimityAssured 15 днів тому +2

    Very straightforward until the crunch point. It will be interesting to see whether you used one of two Skyscrapers, one of several applications of Simple Colouring, or BUG + 1. There may be a W-Wing lurking somewhere, but I find W-Wings very elusive. A refresher video on them wouldn't go amiss. Anyway, here's a possible notation-free path to the crunch point (56 = row 5 column 6):
    56, 92, 74, 25, 97,
    32, 11, 99, 91, 38,
    71, 44, 54, 49, 37,
    39, 87, 48, 19, 28,
    89, 75, 85, 72, 82,
    78, 88, 73, 51, 42,
    21, 65, 45, …
    Then 22 (colours or Skyscraper on 1s), or 23 (BUG + 1); or 27 (colours or Skyscraper on 1s), or 53 (colours on 1s), or 68 (colours on 1s).
    For a very simple variation (still symmetrical), empty R1C6, R4C6, R6C4 and R9C4.

    • @SmartHobbies
      @SmartHobbies  15 днів тому +1

      Nice Julian. Every now and then I find a book puzzle that has a neat solve path or a great instructional position, and this one I felt had both. Thanks for sharing your feedback.

  • @JohnRandomness105
    @JohnRandomness105 15 днів тому +1

    As I filled out the grid, I kept finding (creating by placing digits) five-digit houses and filling them out. I found a couple of triples, and a lone 3 in a block amidst the clutter, letting me place digits throughout. It finally stopped, and I counted 18 cells -- pretty clearly the 18 in the title. I was stuck until I found a functional two-string kite -- 12 in row 1 and 13 in column 2, placing 2 in R6C8. That finished the puzzle. The green cell was filled during the final phase.
    5:10 Yes I did.
    7:50 I only found the 49 pair after finding the triple in the three blank cells above.
    8:50 I found the 5 before the 49 pair, while filling the horizontal domino with 459.
    11:50 I found the two-string kite. The other commenter found the skyscraper.
    13:50 At least finding the skyscraper or the kite proves the uniqueness of the solution. If the 1 had not been in the cell, the puzzle would have broken with no solution. (I also think that skyscrapers are easier than BUG+1.)

    • @SmartHobbies
      @SmartHobbies  15 днів тому +2

      Nice John. I like how you got to the 18 cell position. I agree about the other strategies “proving” the unique solution.

  • @ke9tv
    @ke9tv 15 днів тому +2

    Got down to the 18 cells in the obvious ways. With the big pile of BVC's I started looking for 2-string kites. I spotted (11:50) a different 2-string kite from the one you pointed out, 12's in R1C3/R1C8, and 19's in R2C7, R5C7. Eliminate the 1 in R5C3 The rest of the puzzle follows easily.
    Unique-solution strategies like BUG+1 always feel funny to me.
    Total time 16:47. I'm not that quick. (I just like working 'em, don't aspire to compete.)

    • @SmartHobbies
      @SmartHobbies  15 днів тому +1

      Great job with this puzzle. Way to find 2-string kite.
      What is it about unique solution strategies that you are unsettled about?

    • @ke9tv
      @ke9tv 14 днів тому +1

      @@SmartHobbies They feel like an ugly shortcut. Every puzzle that can be solved with them can be solved without them.

    • @SmartHobbies
      @SmartHobbies  13 днів тому +1

      @@ke9tv That is a fair assessment.

  • @georgesthibaudeau1533
    @georgesthibaudeau1533 15 днів тому +2

    I saw that 123, but wasn't sure that this was the B+1 situation. I also saw the skyscraper of 1s, and again got mixed up and looked for something else. Then I discovered placing a 1 in r6c8 destroyed everything.

    • @SmartHobbies
      @SmartHobbies  15 днів тому +1

      Nice l, George’s!

    • @sharmilisharmili472
      @sharmilisharmili472 14 днів тому

      @@georgesthibaudeau1533
      You hv the habit of seeing bug +1 , in three diff horizontal chutes, I remember you once confused me in some puzzle on other channel , if my memory serves well but otherwise, I agree most of the time, ur arguments are logical.
      Bug+1 is in the entire grid not in the diff chutes of the grid , isn't it Timberlake?

  • @anaayoung9142
    @anaayoung9142 14 днів тому +2

    Hello!
    My time as 6:36. I didn't find it hard this time 🤔
    At the end I had a lot of pairs and 1 cell with 3 numbers. How I solved it: if R1C8 is a 2, then R2C3 is a 2, R1C3 is a 1, R5C3 is a 7, this make R5C5 a 2 and we can't place a 2 in box 6 at all!!
    Interesting new strategy! I didn't know this one. But I had a question: this is valid for any puzzle that had some cells with 2 numbers and 1 with 3 numbers? Or only when we have this 18 cells?
    And one more, correct me if I am wrong. After find the cell with 3 numbers, the number that I will choose to fill it is: the number that appear in other cells 3 times in a row and 3 times in a column?

    • @SmartHobbies
      @SmartHobbies  13 днів тому +2

      Great questions. BUG+1 works with any number of cells remaining as long as one cell has 3 remaining candidates and the others only have 2. You always can pick the candidate in the 3 candidate cell that appears 3 times in the row, column, and block. Hope that helps.

    • @anaayoung9142
      @anaayoung9142 13 днів тому +1

      @@SmartHobbies It helped for sure. Thank you for always being so kind! =)

    • @SmartHobbies
      @SmartHobbies  13 днів тому +1

      @@anaayoung9142 You are welcome. I love doing this and hearing from viewers like you.

  • @sharmilisharmili472
    @sharmilisharmili472 15 днів тому +3

    Easy
    Used skyscraper on 1's.

    • @paulakeay4317
      @paulakeay4317 15 днів тому

      Me too

    • @SmartHobbies
      @SmartHobbies  15 днів тому +2

      Nice job finding the skyscrapers. Do you see them easier than the other strategies like finned X-Wings and 2-string kites?

    • @JohnRandomness105
      @JohnRandomness105 15 днів тому +1

      Normally, skyscrapers and finned X-wings are easier to find than two-string kites. I just happened to find the latter here. (In this case it may have been lots of bivalued cells that gave me the kite.) When I saw this comment, I backtracked to find the skyscraper. It just happened to involve the cells for the two-string kite I found.

    • @paulakeay4317
      @paulakeay4317 15 днів тому +1

      @@SmartHobbies I see finned x-wings regularly in puzzles, but don’t remember using one here. The way my brain works I find 2 string kites just a slightly more elusive version of skyscrapers. The skyscraper in this puzzle was enough, but it may be that I unconsciously used other techniques!

    • @SmartHobbies
      @SmartHobbies  14 днів тому +2

      @@paulakeay4317 awesome job Paula. Multiple ways to get that last solve to break the puzzle open. Some see Finned X-Wings first, but most seem to notice Skyscrapers.