This is interesting, I would think that disposition would be more settled than habit - always surprising how our personal, and contingent, definitions of words can effect, even impede, the learning process. So, Hegel - I have the tendency to tie Aristotle into Hegel; esp in opposition to Kant, for some reason - anyways, have you read much about Hegel's Recognition and how it ties into virtue? that seems so interesting! also, please, do you understand what Hegel means when he says, the passions must be directed (sublated?) into their more rational form in a substantive ethics? - I feel I am close to understanding it. awesome vids, thanks again!
Yes, and it's a complex idea. That's something more for a tutorial session than a UA-cam comment. If you're interested in that, here's my site - reasonio.wordpress.com/tutorials/ Your other alternative would be to poke around in the Half Hour Hegel series, in which at present, I've created about 170 videos. I'm just starting commentary on the the Spirit section later in this month, though
Wow, I didn't know you offered these! That's awesome, I'm going to try one out on this very topic, if that's okay, in the next week or so. Thanks again for your help.
@@GregoryBSadler Understood. But would not each contribute to the practice of the other? One could claim all of the three must be present for any one of them to be present .Is it possible to contemplate, without a knowledge of philosophy? That depends on what contemplation is, and what philosophy is.
Thank you! I m studying Aquinas, your videos about Aristotle's Categories have helped me a LOT!
Glad to read it. I'll be releasing a full online class about the Categories later this month
So am i
Thank you so much! This makes it so much clearer!
You’re welcome!
Aristotle .... how wonderful
He is quite good
This is interesting, I would think that disposition would be more settled than habit - always surprising how our personal, and contingent, definitions of words can effect, even impede, the learning process. So, Hegel - I have the tendency to tie Aristotle into Hegel; esp in opposition to Kant, for some reason - anyways, have you read much about Hegel's Recognition and how it ties into virtue? that seems so interesting! also, please, do you understand what Hegel means when he says, the passions must be directed (sublated?) into their more rational form in a substantive ethics? - I feel I am close to understanding it. awesome vids, thanks again!
In some philosophical systems, disposition is more settled than habit.
Yes, I've read a bit of Hegel in my time
Gregory B. Sadler do you know what he means by giving the passions a rational form by directing them to an ethical substance, though?
Yes, and it's a complex idea. That's something more for a tutorial session than a UA-cam comment. If you're interested in that, here's my site - reasonio.wordpress.com/tutorials/
Your other alternative would be to poke around in the Half Hour Hegel series, in which at present, I've created about 170 videos. I'm just starting commentary on the the Spirit section later in this month, though
Wow, I didn't know you offered these! That's awesome, I'm going to try one out on this very topic, if that's okay, in the next week or so. Thanks again for your help.
If you mean tutorials, make sure to email me with specifics before booking an appointment.
According to Aristotle, when can a habit is good? When knowledge is applied most often or when moral actions are applied well?
ua-cam.com/video/xgf2jztjaF4/v-deo.html
May I cultivate a habit of meditation, contemplation, and the study of philosophy. Thank you.
That would be great - but a complex of habits, rather than one, I think
@@GregoryBSadler Understood. But would not each contribute to the practice of the other? One could claim all of the three must be present for any one of them to be present .Is it possible to contemplate, without a knowledge of philosophy? That depends on what contemplation is, and what philosophy is.
@@MrMarktrumble Sure. Habits can support and reinforce each other