SANDMARC Telephoto 6x vs 2x: Compared!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 31 лип 2024
- Learn more:
Telephoto 6x: sandmarc.com/telephoto-6x
Telephoto 2x: sandmarc.com/telephoto-2x
In this video we'll be explaining the differences between the 58mm 2x Lens and the 6x SANDMARC Telephoto Lenses! Beyond just being able to zoom in further, there are a few things to keep in mind when deciding whether to use a 2x or 6x lens for each scenario. - Наука та технологія
This video was very helpful. I’m still trying to figure out the 6x but the 2x is a next level upgrade for the iphone15 pro.
Super helpful! I was wondering why not just get 6x, and this really helped me think about which one to get. Now I'm thinking I may get both:)
I think the video is missing something very important. That is the f-number. Is it mentioned anywhere? You probably need a lot of light in order to use the 6x. For photographers,. a 1.4x teleconverter loses 1 stop of light, and a 2x teleconverter loses 2 stops. How many stops for the 2x and 6x? Thank you.
I have both 2x and 6x. Trying to sell the 2x because I am very impressed with 6x. With the native camera and 6x, I am good to go on a 13 pro max.
This video is really helpful. I didn't know ... but should have ... that the 6X needs a tripod.
When you compare the 2x vs 6x, I find the 2x is a much sharper lens than the 6x, especially when you compare the beach model. Look at her face and compare.
I get they want to make new products but the 6x is silly. You have to use a tripod and as you saw, it’s still not that sharp. Just get a camera and telephoto if you want zoom
Keep in mind that a camera body and a telephoto lens will cost MUCH more than the 6x by its self 😊.
@@sherinash9854 you think that’s not obvious?
@@jujitsujew23 If it seems obvious to you then your claim that the product is silly makes no sense, since as you yourself find it obvious, the telephoto 6x lens will be much cheaper than a regular set up. That price difference already gives it the right to exist without being silly.
@@jcb449 ...you're so right, a cheaper product that has to be used on a tripod and still doesn't produce sharp photos, as shown in this video, isn't a silly product...that's like buying a laptop that can only connect to the internet through an ethernet cable because its cheaper. Just because something is cheaper does not mean it is automatically not a ridiculous product. Cheaper things are often not good
I’d be really curious how well it works in low light situations like astrophotography, lunar, etc. Those typically already use a tripod so no biggy there. But does it enable a clean lunar image? Also, often folks taking lunar pics don’t mind the compression effect to much.
We did a video on that here: ua-cam.com/video/JkD2YpbT1z4/v-deo.html (go to fifth minute)
Why your lenses are not available in india ?