John Oliver FAILS On Crime
Вставка
- Опубліковано 21 сер 2024
- Get your Liquid Gold: www.liquidgolda...
In this video I destroy the absolute nonsense that is John Oliver's Bail Reform segment
Debate Con Tickets: www.eventbrite...
Website: www.actualjust...
linktr.ee/Actu...
Odysee: odysee.com/@ac...
Rumble: rumble.com/Act...
Instagram NEW: / actualjustice
Twitch: / actualjusticewarrior
Utreon: utreon.com/c/A...
2nd Channel: / ajw2dreamscometrue
TeeSpring Store: teespring.com/...
New Store: actualjusticew...
Gettr: gettr.com/user...
Parler: parler.com/pro...
www.minds.com/...
Support me on Patreon: / seanfitzgerald
Paypal: www.paypal.me/...
Venmo: venmo.com/iams...
Support me on Subscribe Star: www.subscribes...
Gab: gab.com/Iamsean90
Twitter / iamsean90
Backup Twitter / ajwsean
Bitchute: www.bitchute.c...
Discord: / discord
3rd: / dudemonkeyhq
Get Storable Food: www.preparewit...
Get Pocketnet: pocketnet.app/...
Podcast Links:
Spotify: open.spotify.c...
Apple: podcasts.apple...
Sources:
Original Oliver Clip: • Bail Reform: Last Week...
Bragg No Prison: nypost.com/202...
Texas Bail Statute: statutes.capit...
Marvin Mayfield Possession: indefenseof.us...
Chicago Won't pursue: www.foxnews.co...
Illinois Bail Law Explained: news.stlpublic...
10 Criminals 500 Arrests: nypost.com/202...
Bail Re-arrests: nypost.com/202...
NY Mother Story: www.wkbw.com/n...
homeless Man 25 arrests Story: nypost.com/202...
"Bail Reform" Study: www.hks.harvar...
Browder Not About Bail: www.themarshal...
Polling location for New York: Look up your polling location: voterlookup.el...
#BailReform #JohnOliver #IamSean90
FAIR USE NOTICE
This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.
Get your Liquid Gold: www.liquidgoldajw.com
2:45
Ad ends
What arrrrrrrrrr ya' doing with me gold!!??
The skin pinch test is more useful for dehydration. It is the most reliable test for it. If your skin does not bounce back immediately drink water.
Thank you
you look like the thin B-rate version of your tshirt.
I'm old enough to remember when talk show hosts at least pretended not to be blatant political propagandists.
Likewise, I'm old enough to remember when they were funny, too.
Hell yeah Fox News is the worst, MSNBC is an close second
@@T_Time_ Fox isn't great but you'd have to be a fool to think CNN isn't the worst but we do agree that MSNBC is second.
@@Danimal619 CNN is third, I just feel like Fox News and MSNBC does major rage farming which I feel is the worst. CNN is just smug elitist, that act like they care but they don’t.
@@T_Time_ Fox news at least tries to get it right and admit that they are right leaning.
CNN consistently gets stories wrong and refuses to admit that. They intentionally hold back or pull stories if it has a negative impact on the narrative they and MSNBC are pushing. I'm not saying Fox can't be or may not already be guilty but CNN does it constantly and constantly gets it wrong.
-Trump is a racist
-Trump/Russian pee tape
-Trump/Russiagate
-Trump "good people on both sides"
-Trump/quid pro quo
-Covington kids
-Rittenhouse
-Fiery but mostly peaceful protests
-Trump will never get the vax done in time
-Don't trust the vax IF Trump gets it done in time.
-Masks aren't necessary
-masks are necessary and TOTALLY work
-the vax is wonderful
-Jan 6 B.S
CNN is literally the worst. Again, someone would have to be a blind fool to take them seriously.
The Waukesha Christmas Parade Attack was done by someone released on bail reform from a DA that stated he didn't care if his criminal justice reform resulted in innocent deaths.
Here is DA John Chisholm in his own words:
'Is there going to be an individual I divert, or I put into treatment program, who's going to go out and kill somebody? You bet. Guaranteed. It's guaranteed to happen.
'It does not invalidate the overall approach.'
This shows his general attitude towards violent criminals.
Kinda wished you linked an article.
@@lmno567 why? So when it gets scrubbed people can say he’s lying? “Sources” are usually only a reliable source if the establishment that says they’re reliable are reliable themselves which is not the case
@@lmno567 you can Google the statement.
@@lmno567 I saw it.
"If it wins one vote, it's worth it." has finally overtaken "If it saves one life, it's worth it." But, tbh I think they only ever said "If it saves one life" to try to win more votes.
Hammer: $4
Starbucks Coffee: $6
Twitter: $8
Catching Actual Justice Warrior live: Priceless
Pelosi's husband's gay lover?!! I found you out!
Can we all start a GoFundMe for AOC to be able to afford her blue checkmark? 😆
@@walkingTANK forget her "poverty-stricken" family. She needs to be verified on Twitter.
That's a good deal for a hammer anymore.
The worst part is how many people just blindly accept what Oliver says.
It seems that someone having a relatively posh sounding English accent gives them an air of authority. I believe we stopped listening to the English around 250 years ago so I'm not sure why we should do it again now?
I know, i see stupids everywhere.
Hey you can keep him and corden, we don't want them back
Oliver = corrupt, foreign scammer taking advantage of extremely naive (leftists) Americans. How much of the money he’s stolen go back to the American people?
It's unreal.. All of those daily show twats are like media characters from a Paul Verhoeven movie.
Don't spend it all in one place Oliver.
Dork
“What even is crime?” - John Oliver probably
"It's not a crime if you're not white, not a man, and it isn't happening to me." John Oliver verbatim
An increase from 7% to 27% is way worse than a 20% increase. It's actually a 386% increase.
%%% are fun
I wish the UK would take John Oliver back. What they do with him at that point, I’m not concerned about. Just get him out of here and figure it out from there
Nah, keep him and James Corden. Yer welcome. lol
@@warpedreflection3650 And Piers Morgan. A gift from your best friend from across the ocean.
You don't get it. THEY didn't want him either.
Funny thing is that nobody from the uk really knows about him. I was in the British isle a few years back and the funniest thing was that nobody new who John Oliver was. Literally I went from London to the country and I would ask if anybody new about him and not a single one did be it business man or local farmer.
@@warpedreflection3650 And you people wonder why I don't care when you cry about us dumping Markle on you lmao
I wish John Oliver would be held in Rikers indefinitely.
Just because someone has been arrested 25 times for a violent crime doesn't mean they don't deserve a second chance.
...or a 25th chance.
Thay would be 26th chance
Don't worry, Spikd. I got your joke.
2 x 25 = 50
LOL, nice!
The REAL crime is not letting people get away with their crimes.
John always sounds like he's preparing to say the funniest thing ever spoken. And then he doesn't.
That's exactly it, _WHERE IS THE COMEDY, JOHN?_
It's just one big propaganda tube, like who is this man even and why are we expected to give so much credence to his personal views on things? Why does he have that platform if he doesn't use it to entertain us with funny jokes but instead to just endlessly pontificate and berate huge swaths of the American population? How does this show make any money, who even watches this dog crap?
So many questions!
This is the spot on description of him that I didn't know I needed.
If only the political prisoners of J6 were afforded a speedy trial or presumption of innocence.
Oliver is the worst.
The worst until now.
Him calling the algorithm racist is pretty much calling math and data racist. How can anything ever be fixed when people like oliver consistently put feelings over facts
An algorithm isn't mathematics, or data.
An algorithm is simply a set of instructions and it can easily be deeply flawed. In any situation where 'computer says no' alarm bells should ring. As for 'data', the US already one of the largest prison populations with black men over represented. While this may not be racist it has a strong racial element.
I'm pretty sure they've been calling math racist for a while now lol
@@JamesScrote what they actually mean is that whites contributed 'too much' lol, look at music theory specifically. They hate us cuz they anus.
@@Phisherman86
Or when we can demonstrate that there are errors in the algorithm. That one demographic group is over-represented?
By that argument women can't 'keep up' because they are paid 80-90% of the salary of men despite performing the same role.
@@Phisherman86 I do believe it's an ostrich.
An ostrich who believes that if he sees nothing then nothing needs to be done.
Keep telling yourself that...
I will never forgive John Oliver for voicing Zazu in the Lion King Remake.
Fking Disney didn't want Rowan Atkinson reprising his role
Seth Rogen too. Fucking yuck.
@@jldog134 why did they not want him to
It only took Scar appearing on screen and talking, but when Zazu came on and spoke, I went into "Not My Zazu" mode. It was awkward. I couldn't make it past the opening scenes.
@@joecollas9942 Rowan speaks our against pc culture like John Cleese
I must be old, I can remember a time when it was entertaining to watch John Oliver.
Entertaining yes but he was always full of sh1t with scewed data when you looked into his points
same, i watched him way back to even out my political diet, but now all i see of him is when he does something like this and get flack for it.
A balanced diet only works if you dont include junk.
Yeah he was a comedian a long time ago.
Lol John Oliver has always been as entertaining as he is handsome.
I never liked him, he was the worst part of Community because he's just not likeable or funny.
Only John Oliver put as much effort into the truth as he does is covering it up, he might be a valuable commentator.
What's baffling is that he is so easily debunked. Every time. It takes time, and it's tedious, but that's all.
Maybe Oliver should talk to my Home Depot Clerk. He is scared of getting beaten or stabbed. Locking up all his tools. People walking in stealing everyday. Because under $950 no charges.
That one judge was awesome!
Even after several chances she never took the hint that he just wanted her to address him with some respect. People like that not learning lessons is a big part of the problem!
Indeed. If you demonstrate your contempt for a legal process by refusing to understand and follow directions, why should any leniency be granted when your presence before the judge is precisely because you allegedly committed a crime (aka not following the rules).
It's honestly less of a respect issue and more of an issue of having a clear record. "Yes" and "no" are clear phrases that show up neatly on a transcript "yeah, ya, eh, uh-huh, nuh-uh" and the like aren't as clear, and can be argued by enterprising defense attorneys to be inadequate affirmations. The judge gave that defendant three opportunities to clarify for the record, upon not receiving the needed clarification, changed his ruling accordingly.
Also, what the hell was she wearing for the hearing! It looks like she just got done clearing a table at Hooters. If you're not going to have any respect for yourself why would you expect others to respect you?
@@tomcocchi7 A good point
@@tomcocchi7 Good point which I don't think many people actually got regarding the judge. Where I am working now, before the customer service people can charge a client money or anythin, they require the clients to, on the phone, answer to the questions with either a "Yes" or "No" for recording purposes and considering when you are in court, everything you or whoever is in the court at the time say is recorded, a "Yes" or "No" leaves zero ambiguity as to what was said and understood.
So would John think the J6 defendant's should be let out of their PRE-charge, PRE-trial confinement?? 🧐🧐🧐🧐
Darrell Brooks is the perfect example of why we need to stop these policies from remaining in place.
Everyone is worried about rampant crime??
Send out the media! LIE, LIE my pretties!!
The only good thing John Oliver ever did was be part of Community. His character on the show was actually funny, who was originally supposed to play a big part in the show. I can't help but speculate that the show runners found out he was an ass and wrote him off the show/decreased his role on purpose
Does anyone else think reinstituting corporal, and when necessary capital punishment wouldn't be uncalled for?
I'm totally in favor of bringing back public lashings, stockades, and public executions. Show criminals the real consequences of their actions. No more slaps on the wrist.
Yes. If its One thing that describes USA its justice system to gentle
@@eriklarsson6622 yeah, we're too easy on criminals here. Not as bad as someplace like Sweden but it's definitely gotten out of hand. Our prisons aren't exactly nice places to be, but it seems like our "justice" system is bound and determined that criminals never see the inside of a prison.
I’d rather have death penalty than life sentence if I ever killed somebody 😮😅
Oliver is apparently quite the propaganda tool; I listened to that show and was pretty distressed over that guy sitting in jail for 11 months. Thanks for clearing up that his example happened over 20 years ago.
Reform needs to happen on the speedy trial side.
I can’t believe you completely glossed over the Santa joke, the easiest claim to refute. Everyone knows he works year round compiling his list, managing the toy production floor, etc.
He's not only making a list. He's checking it.... not once but twice.
Also, Oliver's show runs for only 30 weeks a year. He gets 22 weeks off per year. It's not exactly 11 months like his Santa claim but he's not the guy to call out someone not working year round.
Big facts
You guys in the comments kill me
😂😂
12:30 No mention of the bail completely denied the Jan 6th prisoners. Some of those folks are going on almost two years.
It didn't even happen two years ago and most of them weren't arrested until weeks or months later. Also, federal crimes are prosecuted on a federal level, so bail reform wouldn't effect them.
@@CERTAIND00M Talk about missing the point.
Ummmm OJ insisted he was INNOCENT. He too had new car, new job etc. 🤣🤣🤣🤣
There is no bail for capital murder charges.
@@CERTAIND00M NO 💩. The point is he said he was SUPER DUPER INNOCENT. 🤣🤣🤣🤣
As a citizen of Illinois born and raised, I appreciate you acknowledging thses things.
Dude, your videos rock. I can't even wrap my head around the amount of preparation, effort, and content knowledge that goes into making these.
Thanks for all you do.
I like the emphasis Oliver puts on the accused insisted they were innocent. That means zero.
Er no.
They are accused. They have yet to be found guilty (or otherwise). And such they should be treated with the same respect as regular citizens until the trial. Unless the court sees fit to place them on remand.
It is patently ridiculous when people trot out the old ‘he protests his innocence to this day’, as if that is worth a rat’s arse.
@@johnathanh2660 He’s saying that when an advocate for an accused criminal cites the accused’s own claim of innocence, it nearly always means that the person going to bat for the accused has literally nothing substantive to say in their defense.
@@johnathanh2660 people are innocent until proven guilty, okay great good job pointing out the obvious 👏 That wasn't the point at all. The point was EVERYONE claims innocence regardless of it being the true or not and if you need to emphasize the accused claim of innocence, to make your point then you're making no point at all and I would go as far as saying you have no point.
@@lazydaisy2292
Criminals lie - good job in pointing out the obvious. And if that's your point you have no point at all. They are, after all criminals.
So, on that theme - why do we use bail - to ensure attendance at court, nothing more. So the measure is - are people who are having their bail waived attending court?
The big question is why are they doing this? They must know it is an evil thing.
Ah yes, one of the many British political commentators who talks down to Americans for not agreeing with his opinion on a nation he has no connection to, no investment in, and no education concerning laws or advanced history. Nor does he possess even the slightest idea of what the average American experience is, given the fact he was born and raised in Britain and didn't come to America until he was already at some level of success and adulthood in his life... Why are these people even humored when it comes to American politics, economics, or social structure? Wouldn't you feel weird going to the UK and looking down your nose at people who spent their whole lives as citizens of the UK, because they don't agree with your opinion of the country you have no connection to whatsoever? What a weird concept, especially considering one of the main arguments against the Iraq War for Democrats was always "We shouldn't get involved with the politics or social structures of other countries that do not involve us"... I guess they forgot they felt that way. This is why I myself left the Democratic Party in recent years. I believe woke British comedians have no place spewing actual political rhetoric as mainstream media when ultimately America is a horse they didn't bet on to begin with. Say what you want about John Stuart, but he was always quick to remind us that he was just a comedian. That why I found the Colbert Report genuinely hilarious, but cringe when watching the Late Show in 2022. These guys forgot that they aren't actually qualified to preach social commentary as an absolute science, nor does their line of work call for them to attack citizens or other journalists who question or simply disagree with their outlooks. What started out as a source of entertainment in the early 2000's on the Daily Show has led to some of the most hateful, tribalistic, and prejudice woke garbage media commentators on television today. Sure Fox News, MSNBC, and CNN are all guilty of the same actions, but they aren't spewing ridiculous absurd narratives with no sources whatsoever and then hiding behind the "I'm a comedian, not a real journalist" excuse when they get called out for it. I can't believe I used to actually enjoy watching these guys. When they used to make these jokes, it seemed light hearted and on several occasions John Stuart and Steven Colbert even showed respect to people on the other side after mocking them, but those days are long gone now and what started as comedy has become a leading source of woke hate fuel in the United States... the country John Oliver has no connection to whatsoever.
That haughty, look-down-my-nose attitude from Brits to Americans about OUR politics isn't at all limited to John Oliver, I assure you.
Tons of European and Canadian d-bags seem to always want to weigh in on what's going on in MY neck of the woods.
And can you believe that these "people" have the audacity to scream at me when I talk about THEIR politics? "ShUdDuP mUrIcAn, u DoN LiVe HeRe!"
I always have to ask them where that same energy is when they tell me I should disarm myself to make THEM feel better across an entire ocean.
" .... the country John Oliver has no connection to whatsoever."
Except a) Where his has been working
b) Where he has chosen to emigrate to, and
c) His wife and kids.
"These guys forgot that they aren't actually qualified to preach social commentary as an absolute science."
No one is qualified to preach social commentary as an absolute science, because social commentary isn't even a science.
The *value* of an outsiders' perspective is explained in Spotlight, by Stanley Tucci's character (he plays an Armenian-American Lawyer who acts as an advocate for victims).
Either way, most of the staff on the show are US, and Oliver is just the presenter.
@@johnathanh2660 Right, but the fact remains, John Oliver isn't an American he's and Englishman. He had his social and political opinions made up long before his wife/children/ or adopted citizenship were even factors in his life. If you think someone can't choose a side and delusionally stick to it the rest of their life, then you haven't been paying attention to how American politics works. John Oliver was talking down to non-Liberal Americans even in his earliest days of citizenship, again while knowing next to nothing about American law or anything past basic American history. Meaning his opinions on subjects such as law, social commentary in the United States, and any sort of history past a 5th grade level is compromised and skewed at best. If you wanna ride his d**k just say you wanna ride his d**k, but don't sit here and waste my time by telling me he has the same knowledge or investment in the United States as the average citizen when this man came here knowing damn well he already had the money and the ties to his home country to fall back on if the ideals he's out here hustling blow up in his face.. As for your response to my "He's not qualified to speak on social commentary as a science" comment, that was a very strange and argumentative way to say "I agree". You realize I am literally saying the exact same thing you said about that right? I'm not accusing John Oliver on not having the RIGHT to spew a bunch of ignorant crap at anyone who will listen, I'm saying he's not QUALIFIED to talk down to people as if his commentaries were a scientific fact (which he does). I can tell by the way that you talk, you consider yourself an intellectual. So I would advise that you try to figure out the context of what someone is saying before you fly into an angry internet nerd rage next time. FOH.
@@squarepickle
Wow. A lot to unpick in your rant there.
'I agree' If I meant I agree I would have said that, I was describing 'play the ball, not the man', which is exactly what the rest of your rant isn't. Address the issue at hand. 'He's not QUALIFIED...', I asked who is... more to the point you 'get' that there's a production TEAM right?
'A bunch of ignorant crap...' because you disagree...' - play the ball..
'I can tell...' right. Good to know. So, try staying ON TOPIC.
And then you try and have a dig at Oliver because a) he's successful (the American dream, right?) & b) an immigrant with a green card.
Apparently you have 'special' knowledge that is only taught in your classroom.
Anybody who claims to be 'special', is an immediate 'red flag'.
Tl;Dr- argue your case, and keep the personalities out of it.
Hey Sean, I would imagine that garbage show has at least 50 left wing hacks "writers". I don't know your whole setup/procedure for your videos, but I'm sure it's a lot of work, and it's shows. Appreciate the effort. Keep on fighting these lying corporate shills. Great job.
In 2000 crooked detectives put made up/trumped up charges on me with no evidence because I would not go to the station with them. I sat in jail for a year with a 150k bond while they offered 30 years then 15 years, So I planned to go to trial. This year was with a Public defender which was saying I should accept the 15. When I actually got a paid lawyer the very next court appearance they offered time served with one of the lesser charges which was still a felony (I still wanted to go to trial but my lawyer advised me to take the deal even though I was innocent). I was 18, this basically ruined my chances at getting a decent job and still I have a felony on my record to this day. Courts are not about finding the truth and people without lots of money are at a huge disadvantage. I know a system is needed but changes are needed.
Dude that fucking sucks
Sounds about the system we have. 'Tough on crime' means more abuse like what you received.
Total reform is needed
There are always many more wrong ways to go about doing anything than there are right ways.
I worked in a county jail for a few months after I got out of the military and I was shocked by the number of people who were in jail for 1 or 2 years still waiting on a trial. We literally have a constitutional right to a speedy trial, and nothing about 12+ months is speedy. I've tried to argue this same point with people before and so many are quick to defend the legal system, saying "well, it takes a while to build a strong case, that's just how it is". No. You can be tough on crime and still believe that people shouldn't be held for literal years without trial in the country. Like AJW said, they had enough evidence to arrest the person and hold them in a county jail, why don't they have enough to go to trial?
"We literally have a constitutional right to a speedy trial" Yes anyone sitting in jail for years waved that right at probably one of the first court dates they went too. I think anyone who has ever gone to court knows the first thing a judge asks you is do you want a speedy trial but anyone that probably is guilty waves that right thinking they can get out of the crime or delay it till it goes away. OJ Simpson had a trial start really fast after he was arrested because he was one of the few that went with the "constitutional right to a speedy trial"
Probably corruption as the fuller the jail the more money it needs. I wouldnt be surprised to find out those DAs and Judges are very well off.
Bingo.
We have too many different 'crimes' that aren't murder, theft, kidnapping or rape.
We lock up those who don't deserve it and let go those who deserve to rot
If they had it their way, you would never get to trial. So any time is speedy by comparison.
You see, your problem is that you make perfect sense. That won't get you anywhere.
Now ask Oliver about the Whitehouse trespassers who have been held for 2 years (mostly in solitary confinement) without being charged and watch him do a complete 180
Oliver is so damn smug. Insufferable.
Regardless of how it happened, what that kid went through in prison was heinous…The Browder kid
Crimes against the elderly should be a felony and mandatory prison term
Sean is always at his best when he talks about crime, I'm glad that he seems to be leaning into it more with his videos. Although his videos about TYT are great too.
Curious about all the changes you had to make to get this to stay up. Great video though.
I actually changed it back to the original & filed UA-cam's accelerated appeal thing in order to get it viewable while HBO decides whether or not to screw me
My local judges made a good point. Bail is solely about whether or not the person is likely to not appear - looking at history, type of crime (and therefore incentive to not appear), connections to the community, etc.
When it comes to violence or chance of re-offending on bond that’s when you look to see what will it take to prevent that; check-ins with jail staff, GPS monitoring, ankle bracelet, total house arrest, or confinement.
Bail should not be used as a substitute for the other tools to keep people from endangering the community.
Is there anything Oliver doesn’t fail at?
Being a dork 🤣
Being on the winning side.
Looking like Louis Theroux crossed with a muskrat
So when you program in a bunch of data to a computer. It determines black people are more likely to reoffend, skip court....... BAD COMPUTER.
Yes, something is wrong with the code..... it's almost as if it's been badly written.
I like the part where the criminal who robs you can come back the same day and assault you again for reporting the crime. Good times!
Ak nation was talking about that a guy robbed a shake shop assaulted the manager which means sucker punched her out of her shoes. And was released from jail that day. So while shes still got her head swelling up the bastard could walk down the road to her shop. Perfect world? If it was me id just wait out side the jail with a rifle.
John Oliver should be sentenced to ride the NYC subway every day for the next 10 years, and only the subway, no cabs, can't drive himself, can't accept a ride from anyone. I'd wager he wouldn't survive unscathed for long.
AJW never ceases to amaze me with his analysis, and this video made me wonder:
Who would you rather have on your debate team:
Sean Fitzgerald or Kayleigh McEnany?
Reminds me of the Original RoboCop where they release all the Criminals to cause Chaos.
Should release every person to Oliver's house, see if he complains
Dammit the last 2 times Sean's come to Dallas for DebateCon I haven't been able to go, and I live in Texas too! I hope I can go next time, keep going Sean so I can fulfill my destiny of seeing you debate live in Dallas!
Damnit Sean! Why you gotta make me feel old.
“This happened in 2001, 21 years ago!”
I graduated high school two years before that. Why does my back hurt all of a sudden!
Oh hey, a living fossil
@@williamchristy9463 😂🤣😂🤣 get off my lawn!
You are a threat or likely to flee and need to be held or you don't. How much money you have doesn't affect that.
This really should be the most simple thing. I hate when people make this so complicated.
If a rate goes up from 7% to 20% it's not up by 20% because you're not comparing the number to the total, you have to compare the two percentages to EACH OTHER. So is actually up by a little over 50%...
7x3=21=300% increase
Its way higher then 50 its like 250%
Stick to your day job.
It’s so frustrating that they only have one viewpoint and go with that no matter what
That's the issue with all these "comedians", they are lecturing / holding a sermon, they aren't interested in discussing the issues in an effort to get to the truth, or even a compromise.
Just FYI, John is just a tv host, the writers write his material. He's still awful though
Hes a human being too presumably
The only constitutional purpose of bail is to ensure the accused shows up for trial. That is it.
Lets not forget about all the crime that is not reported and the theft etc that criminals get away with.
This is what I want to see: Any indictment must be tried within 3 months of arrest or the case is automatically dismissed with prejudice. Plea bargains are abolished.
A lot of places would have to hire a lot more prosecutors. But I suppose that's the incentive to actually prevent crime.
@@petrie911 They might, they might not. Too many people that aren't guilty are being rammed through systems and spit out with plea "deals." If they have a solid case, they need to present it immediately. If they can't produce complete discovery in a timely manner then they deserve to have the case shut down. If they can't present the case in a timely manner then they deserve to have the case shut down. A solid criminal case doesn't need three years post-arrest to be tried.
Destroying John Oliver is as much of an achievement as punching through a wet paper bag.
The only reason they feel the need to do this is because they know they’re opponents have a good argument. Their partisanship blinds then from seeing that being ostensibly pro-crime is not a winning position.
I remember when Comedy News used made up translations for the joke and rarely talked about actual news unless it was so rediculous the news was the joke.
The Two Laurens should host a regular show called Southern Chen.
For a side that talks a lot about systematic influences, they sure forget it when it comes to policing
Bail jumping, that is to say, getting bail but not showing up for trial, will get you put on a Flight Risk list. Also remember that after a revolution the revolutionaries who are not part of the new regime are the first against the wall because they have run a successful revolution. So when you combine these two if a revolution comes the new regime will look at the Flight Risk list and make them disappear.
This is a pretty incoherent thought. No offense.
I actually live right next to cook county. We affection call Kim Chewbacca 🤣
Nothing will change until the rich start to feel the effects of their false righteousness.
The arguments from people advocating for woke bail reform are perfect examples of the ad misericordiam fallacy.
Good work AJW.
Jon Oliver is turning into a raving lunatic and it’s hilarious to me
26:00 Oh no - The new get-out-of-jail-free law is for the whole state of Illinois ?! holy crap
"November 19th, of this month" Classic Sean
Speedy trial is guaranteed in the Constitution. However, if you're a lawyer is in talks with the district attorney that time stops.
And to this day, John Oliver still never wrote that campaign check to Trump.
I don't think there should be holding exceptions for weekends or holidays. If a judge doesn't want to work on a Saturday, that is not my problem. You don't just get to take away someone's rights because nobody feels like working today.
If the crime isn't bad enough to make a judge come in on a Saturday, then it isn't bad enough to hold the person. The government doesn't have the right to have a day off. The people do have a right to due process.
I’d like to see John Oliver live in these areas and we’ll see how much he wants to simp for the DNC..
I miss a time when saying “Floyd” was about a great band 😢
Anyone ever noticed how uncomfortable his audience sounds when they laugh?
That woman deserved a bail raise. He asked for a confirming answer, she wanted to be obstinate, and it costed her a higher bail. She had it coming.
Agreed. All she had to do was say "yes." You don't screw with a judge.
@@SamtheBravesFan Right then look and turn around and you'll say that judge was being racist. Racist for what? Because she refused to answer properly. Ebonics doesn't teach you how to incorrectly speak to a judge. Ebonics is in fact rooted in southern American English
If justice is blind then how you answer a judge surly matters.
@@fajile5109 It matters because it's to show respect for the courtroom and the people in it. Last time I checked a voice is heard, not seen.
A civil courtroom requires civil answers and basic signs of respect. If you don't give it, you don't get it.
The only bail reform that should happen is if judges are setting bail too high or too low. Too high, they may not understand the economic conditions. You don't need a million dollar bail on a steel worker. But their home value as bail is decent. Judges should get a full picture of your finances before setting bail that's all that really has to happen
The reason he was held for 11 months awaiting trial is because he waved his right to a speedy trial (almost certainly)
Yes how do people not know this. In California your first court date asks if you want a speedy trial if not you sit in jail.
And I'm pretty sure that waiving the right is an ongoing thing meaning that defendants can request a speedy trial at any time in the process, so even if they waive the right at first, they can exercise is later.
That is not a thing in Alabama
In jolly Britain, words are crimes! Blimey!
Wow. This aged even better than I would have imagined. Cashless bail has ruined cities and ran businesses out of inner cities.
As a resident of Harris County(Houston), TX, it's just sad. The cities are Dem strongholds and people just vote D down ballot. So while Texas may stay R as a whole, the cities turn more and more blue.
This video is funnier than John Oliver show well done
Speedy trails are the correct reform, we need to fail on the side of public safety.
How does John Oliver not pass out with how fast he talks nonsense?
The argument against anecdotal evidence has always bothered me anyway.
After all, what is empirical data other than a collection of anecdotal circumstances?
How many personal incidents have to happen before it actually becomes data?
If you do a study of 10,000 people, isn't that just 10,000 anecdotal situations grouped together?
In the end, all a person can 100% rely on are things that they see or hear or that happened to them ie. anecdotes. Unless I see, hear, or experience something it might as well be hypothetical numbers anyway, especially with tests, polls, or focus groups I am not a part of nor have any way of verifying for myself.
If I see crime getting worse near where I live each day (which I do,) I am going to call it crime getting worse.
Isn't one argument against anecdotal evidence the implication that the sample size is too small to be reliable. Like how Oliver points to a study saying bail reform produced no statistical rise in [crime?], but AJW had to point out the sample size only covered 3 months or so.
If you have 10,000 samples, I'd say you got a good data set to start with. But 10 or so anecdotes wouldn't carry the same weight. At least, this is what I suspect Oliver is insinuating when we makes that argument.
@@charetjc Yeah but what I think OP is talking about is how people in general are way too quick to pull out the "anecdotal evidence" card when it only barely applies, if at all.
It's a really handy hand-wave to most people, used to brush away supporting evidence for arguments they personally don't like.
@@charetjc Right, but I'm saying who's to say when group is big enough to be "important?" A group starts at one. If i as one person gets robbed, then crime (for me) just went up 100% and if that one person is out on "bail reform" then it means one crime could have been prevented, meaning, no matter which way you cut it, bail reform is a bad thing, anecdotal or not.
@@sparrow420500
And the point you're missing is that *without* bail reform, the accused *may* have been in prison, or may not. The judge, currently, can choose remand, bail or a very low bail/RoR. It doesn't follow that the best solution is abolish/delay bail reform. In the final analysis it's a question of targeting and managing the likelihood of offending.
Thank you for your work, Mr. Fitzgerald.
Republicans use anecdotes as evidence.
Now allow me to use anecdotes as evidence to prove why we should be soft on crime by citing a Texas bail case.
John Oliver is just Joe Rogan for people who like Hamilton.
2:46 sponsor is over
a british guy talking about american issues that he's privileged enough to not worry about...
bruh...
That mug shot list also featured virtually only men. I would love to know if John Oliver thinks that this makes the system "strikingly sexist".
goddamn Lauren Southern is aging like fine wine.
Damn straight
Remember guys tough on crime not on the criminal.
Let's see Oliver apply his arguments to the Jan six incarcerations.