If Kent Mansely Was Charged For His Crimes

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,2 тис.

  • @TheRealW.S.Foster
    @TheRealW.S.Foster Рік тому +6175

    Yeah, I kind of figured Mansley would've probably gotten life in federal prison for almost nuking an entire town off the map.

    • @kraevorn7483
      @kraevorn7483 Рік тому +479

      That would required the government to acknowledge the fact that they launched a nuke without following the proper protocols

    • @munken7673
      @munken7673 Рік тому +322

      ⁠@@kraevorn7483he acted on his own and didn’t have the rank to do it and his boss had him arrested for it

    • @alexthedemon2203
      @alexthedemon2203 Рік тому +178

      @@munken7673 Still if that got out to the public the government/military would have gotten a ton of backlash for letting it happen in the first place

    • @swiftstreak98
      @swiftstreak98 Рік тому

      He would've became someone else's bitch in prison

    • @alexsanchez8961
      @alexsanchez8961 Рік тому +58

      Yep definitely life in prison 😂😂😂damn he got charged so much I'm still surprised they didn't show him after that

  • @silverswordsmith5424
    @silverswordsmith5424 Рік тому +5430

    It should also be considered that, if Mansley has a military rank, even if he's retired military, he would be guilty of multiple counts of disrespecting a commissioned officer, lying to a commissioned officer, insubordination, disertion, and would be subject to court-martial, which means he could be tried and convicted of *all* of his crimes *twice.*

    • @VlRGlL
      @VlRGlL Рік тому +462

      Would falsely assuming a CO’s rank to launch a nuke on American soil also be treason?

    • @silverswordsmith5424
      @silverswordsmith5424 Рік тому +360

      @@VlRGlL Hmm... that one's a bit tough. I think the soldier who launched the nuke would probably have plausible deniability. They were already poised to launch the nuke at a three star general's orders. They got two conflicting orders one after the other. At worst they may get discharged but I think they would be fine otherwise.

    • @romankvapil9184
      @romankvapil9184 Рік тому +117

      And if you're going to be court-martialed. You're pretty much guaranteed to be found guilty no matter what given how that system works.

    • @romankvapil9184
      @romankvapil9184 Рік тому +87

      OH, and this assuming that he won't be straight up tried for treason, and probably be set for the death penalty.

    • @romankvapil9184
      @romankvapil9184 Рік тому +89

      @@silverswordsmith5424 I'm pretty sure they'd be reprimanded at worst if the General were to vouch and testify about the situation. You are correct though, launching a nuke on conflicting orders, is pretty steep of a charge. I don't think they'll spend time in the slammer given the situation. But I don't think they'll be handling anything like that ever again.

  • @fritzman6483
    @fritzman6483 Рік тому +2155

    Mansley would not have even gotten to the legal issues I guarantee that he would have been buried six feet under in some obscure location by his intelligence agency superiors for being an absolute liability

    • @theapexsurvivor9538
      @theapexsurvivor9538 Рік тому +162

      Man(sley) single handedly has a rap sheet to rival Quantico and Langley combined...

    • @wildfire9280
      @wildfire9280 10 місяців тому +34

      Considering what was going on at the time, his superiors would have to have a very all over the place definition of being an absolute liability for themselves.

    • @fritzman6483
      @fritzman6483 10 місяців тому +56

      @@wildfire9280 having an entire division of military personnel and a town full of civilians witness a nuclear weapon being launched

    • @fritzman6483
      @fritzman6483 10 місяців тому +39

      @@wildfire9280 MKUltra was genuinely more under wraps than a nuclear explosion within the United States aimed at a civilian population. Every big guy possible would have detected that and would start asking questions

    • @Raveseeker
      @Raveseeker 10 місяців тому

      @@fritzman6483 Mansley would only make it to court to be nailed to the wall with a telephone pole; you have to have someone to blame, and it's sure as fuck not going to be anyone else.

  • @HylianKnight02
    @HylianKnight02 Рік тому +3104

    Here's a big one too, and I don't know if it would even count as a charge. As you said, this is set during the Cold War, and we know it doesn't as the ending of the film is set a few months after the Giant's sacrifice. But here's the thing....
    Mansley launched a goddamn nuke, during the goddamn cold war, that detonated somewhere in the stratosphere, now, there were of course nuclear tests during that time period, and the U.S Government most likely could pass it off as one, but Mansley VERY well could have made the Cold War go hot with that one action had the Soviet Union took that as hostile action.
    Is "Almost causing nuclear war" a charge?

    • @Sbungo61
      @Sbungo61 Рік тому +521

      That jut can be counted as high treason

    • @jeffowens9536
      @jeffowens9536 Рік тому +368

      Well, if you launch a missile without good reason, it's safe to say... *_you fucked up._*

    • @whuuuut2035
      @whuuuut2035 Рік тому

      It might also fall under "attempted chemical warfare/chemical poisoning" considering the nuke exploded over the town, the fallout and initial radiation burst would defiantly impact people, animals and nature. Also the EMP would mess up electric grids and the flash could have damaged peoples' eyes. All a war crime breaking the Geneva Convention so he'd not only answer to the American Federal Government, but also to the United Nations Council.

    • @connormacleod4922
      @connormacleod4922 Рік тому +342

      I remember the story of when the Soviet early warning system detected a Nuclear launch in 1983 from the US and it was up to one man whether to respond or not. Thanks to his calm under pressure, he realize it must of been a false alarm because only one launch was detected. If the US wanted to do a first strike, they would send everything they have he reasoned. Turns out he was right, it was a computer malfunction and a false reading. The incident wouldn't be public knowledge until 1998.
      I imagine something similar happened in Iron Giant on the Soviet side. Only difference being the Nuke was real in the movie's case. One hell of a close call nevertheless.

    • @Orca19904
      @Orca19904 Рік тому +176

      @@connormacleod4922 Plus the nuke detonated well outside of Soviet territory over US airspace. Once they saw the detonation and where it happened, they likely would have written it off as another test, though might have been a bit confused by how close it was to populated areas.
      Another point however is this was in the 1950's; I don't know if either the US or the USSR had missile warning systems sophisticated enough to detect a launch while it was still in the initial launch stage.

  • @jurgenronaaz4695
    @jurgenronaaz4695 Рік тому +2197

    I am 100% certain that launching a nuke at your own country, and launching a nuke without proper authorization, are ALSO illegal. No clue what the charge IS but I think we can just add a life sentence and death penalty as a good ballpark estimate, yes?

    • @TheReaperHunter
      @TheReaperHunter Рік тому +296

      As far as I can find, the highest/closest thing to a charge for that would still fall under Treason. High Treason specifically. Witch is 9/10 times an instant death penalty.

    • @jurgenronaaz4695
      @jurgenronaaz4695 Рік тому +38

      Yeah that seems reasonable to me, thanks for figuring that out! Have a great day!

    • @badabomb9946
      @badabomb9946 Рік тому +1

      @@TheReaperHunter From a brief delve into Wikipedia it looks like "high" treason isn't really a thing in US federal or state legal code, it's just treason, there's no degrees to it. Also treason is an exceptionally rare crime to be charged with, less than 30 people have ever been convicted of it and only about a third of those were executed for it in the United States. Mansley's case, though, would be by far the most severe act of treason ever committed against the United States and would almost definitely land him a seat on the electric chair.

    • @markusallen6818
      @markusallen6818 Рік тому +34

      Pretty sure that would constitute as treason

    • @cherrygrabber7172
      @cherrygrabber7172 Рік тому +14

      No wonder Giant was smiling at the end.

  • @mitchhaelann9215
    @mitchhaelann9215 Рік тому +1267

    When he committed treason, he also technically committed Desertion of Duty. Not sure how the military handles that.

    • @concept5631
      @concept5631 Рік тому +104

      Badly, I assume.

    • @SokuThePunless
      @SokuThePunless Рік тому +182

      I’m gonna assume he got court-martialed, and tried in military court. There are 14 offensives, most of which must occur during times of war (The Cold War in this case), a military officer could commit that could potentially lead to the death penalty. I think Mansly committed at least four. That man’s probably dead.

    • @zdor95
      @zdor95 Рік тому +42

      Rule 1004. Capital cases
      (11) That, only in the case of a violation of Arti-
      cle 104 or 106a:
      (A) The accused has been convicted of another
      offense involving espionage or treason for which
      either a sentence of death or imprisonment for life
      was authorized by statute; or
      (B) That in committing the offense, the ac-
      cused knowingly created a grave risk of death to a
      person other than the individual who was the victim.
      For purposes of this rule, “national security”
      means the national defense and foreign relations of
      the United States and specifically includes: a mili-
      tary or defense advantage over any foreign nation or
      group of nations; a favorable foreign relations posi-
      tion; or a defense posture capable of successfully
      resisting hostile or destructive action from within or
      without.

    • @chrisd2051
      @chrisd2051 Рік тому +23

      Typically, death

    • @Halo1138
      @Halo1138 Рік тому +17

      At 2800 feet per second.

  • @edwardreed67
    @edwardreed67 10 місяців тому +642

    I love how Mansley, this random FBI guy, has coursed more damage and risk to human life than a majority of Disney villains

    • @jack727dave5
      @jack727dave5 10 місяців тому +63

      Welcome to the cold war

    • @j.a.pelaez6435
      @j.a.pelaez6435 8 місяців тому

      Least harmful CIA/FBI goon

    • @c0mpu73rguy
      @c0mpu73rguy 7 місяців тому +2

      Even Shan Yu?

    • @MrPlayerOneP1
      @MrPlayerOneP1 5 місяців тому +8

      ​​​@@c0mpu73rguydid Shan Yu nearly got nuked an entire town (or even half of a state) causing over 700 (probably much more than that) deaths (children and babies included) and destroying billions of dolars in properties such as buildings (even hospitals and the shelters), vehicles (including powerful military tanks), and ruined a huge part of the environment, leaving a HUGE permanent mark in the USA history?
      Sorry, that was way over the line (also sorry 4 ma bad English)

    • @c0mpu73rguy
      @c0mpu73rguy 5 місяців тому +7

      @@MrPlayerOneP1 Shan Yu decimated entire villages.

  • @Colonel-Sigma
    @Colonel-Sigma 10 місяців тому +1056

    Mansley's lawyer: "right so the good news is you don't owe the court any money and your time served has been reduced to nothing. The bad news is you're going to be executed by firing squad."

    • @shadydaemon4178
      @shadydaemon4178 8 місяців тому +19

      XD

    • @kingofthepod5169
      @kingofthepod5169 8 місяців тому +99

      "And this time the firing squad has a last request."
      "What's that?"
      "Anti Material Rifles."

    • @jiyuhong5853
      @jiyuhong5853 5 місяців тому +3

      @@kingofthepod5169 so anti-tank guns?

    • @ALJ9000
      @ALJ9000 5 місяців тому +14

      @@kingofthepod5169 Actually, 50. BMG would’ve only been for M2 Brownings at this point in time.
      So it would be Heavy Machine Guns

    • @lavenderflowersfall280
      @lavenderflowersfall280 3 місяці тому

      I figured it would be the firing squad

  • @mr.bluesky8554
    @mr.bluesky8554 Рік тому +1282

    Man was definitely executed like a week after

    • @alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi3723
      @alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi3723 Рік тому +116

      They used all 4 Iowas so they dont miss

    • @concept5631
      @concept5631 Рік тому +39

      God willing

    • @mung01re
      @mung01re 11 місяців тому +145

      Nah, even a case as high profile as this, capital punishment doesn't kick in _that_ fast. Mansley was rotting in a cell for at least eight years before they walked him to the chair.

    • @Dramatic_Gaming
      @Dramatic_Gaming 10 місяців тому +59

      Bold of you to assume he even saw the next sunrise.

    • @jacobcasler8684
      @jacobcasler8684 9 місяців тому +51

      He did that in front of an entire town and an entire platoon led by a general that was there. There's no way he's living another day after that stunt. Straight up guilty by the strike of a gavel sentencing him to immediate execution

  • @styxriverr5237
    @styxriverr5237 Рік тому +278

    Man, they'd probably bring his ass back to life after the first death penalty just to give him a second one.

  • @deathdrivesapontiac
    @deathdrivesapontiac Рік тому +456

    All of his crimes were done at the taxpayer’s expense also. A major abuse of power

    • @bluesnake1713
      @bluesnake1713 Рік тому +35

      But that's probably going to be piled up with that fine, years in prison, and with the death penalty, he may not make it until the years served is met.

    • @ZeldagigafanMatthew
      @ZeldagigafanMatthew 8 місяців тому +2

      Was qualified immunity a thing back in October 1957?

    • @clangaman2810
      @clangaman2810 5 місяців тому

      @@ZeldagigafanMatthew It was, but qualified immunity didn’t really start rearing its ugly until after JFK was assassinated, J. Edgar Hoover and Lyndon B. Johnson had quite a long list of people they wanted to keep immune, including KKK members and politicians who were anti-Civil Rights.
      But considering the fact that Mansley not only abused his power as a government agent, but also attempted to launch a NUKE during the period of the Cold War where the Doomsday Clock was set to “2 Minutes to Midnight” from all the nuclear bomb tests, a nuke on American soil- even their own, would not have just killed the 7000 or so people, including the army unit and G-men, but could also have the potential to have kickstarted World War Three if President Eisenhower and the rest of Congress decided to blame Russia.
      Can’t get immunity for starting or attempting to start up an intercontinental or global conflict.
      Mansley would 100% be given death via firing squad or hanging.

    • @buddermonger2000
      @buddermonger2000 11 днів тому

      ​@@ZeldagigafanMatthew definitely not for screw ups of this caliber

  • @Khetsisal33
    @Khetsisal33 Рік тому +482

    I like how the Captain of the Nautilus just went " fuck it we ball" after hearing some incoherent screaming telling him to fire a nuke. Not sure about military protocol but pretty sure all he did was acknowledge the general was contacting him while in standby. To actually issue a fire order wouldn't he have to say some kind of confirmation code? Especially after confirming the target was right on top of an active zone.That Captain is definitely getting court martialed.

    • @TheDapperDragon
      @TheDapperDragon Рік тому +175

      While you're right, to play devils advocate here, this IS mid cold war. Pretty much everyone with a nuclear key was just ITCHING to use it.

    • @adriannash2705
      @adriannash2705 Рік тому +176

      Plus Mansly sounded panicked which to a certain extent could have passed the notion that the general had just died and they had no other option

    • @TheGospodinmichail
      @TheGospodinmichail Рік тому +196

      Just rewatched that scene to be sure. At that point all conventional weapons didn't even scratch the giant and its weapon created a brief green sun on the horizon. The armed forces were a bit stressed.
      As for the Nautilus, it had the nuke codes confirmed, warhead armed and safety off. They were literally waiting finger-above-button for "LAUNCH" or "ABORT". Considering that the general called them personall and next thing they hear is a panicked "LAUNCH THE MISSILE, NOW", it's quite... "regular" response.

    • @RogueT-Rex8468
      @RogueT-Rex8468 Рік тому +66

      @@adriannash2705I always assumed that exactly.
      I mean shit hit the fan big time and guns literally blazing- that could have been a split second death for all he knew.

    • @thatguydownthestreat
      @thatguydownthestreat 10 місяців тому +34

      as the replies point out, its not DEFINITE, but he would probably be tried in the same case AS Mansley. I think there's a lot of circumstantial evidence for him to claim he had acted as anyone could have been expected to in that situation, least of which being the fact that 1970's radio technology can make it quite difficult to tell between voices.

  • @jesusofbullets
    @jesusofbullets Рік тому +717

    “Mansly not only do I sentence you death, but the state will hold your soul in a high security soul estate for 175,075.5 years.”
    Truly, the only way to effectively carry out that sentence.

    • @panther-nk2hn
      @panther-nk2hn 10 місяців тому

      "Hey, Satan. Yeah, it's the Oval Office. I got one coming down for you, give him the Special Treatment."

    • @MrEvan312
      @MrEvan312 9 місяців тому +27

      Imagine if they would find some way to resurrect you every time you died or had some way to control where you reincarnate each time, THEN they let you die

    • @jesusofbullets
      @jesusofbullets 9 місяців тому +11

      @@MrEvan312
      Please don’t give Ra’s Al Ghul any ideas.

    • @TimeTravelinc
      @TimeTravelinc 9 місяців тому +2

      The Observers and the Q would agree.*
      *Guess the references

    • @danolantern6030
      @danolantern6030 9 місяців тому +8

      “In addition, your soul will be tortured during that time, and once it is released, you will be reimprisoned once you reincarnate and forced to repeat your sentence.”

  • @PunnySnuck
    @PunnySnuck Рік тому +785

    Since The Giant is sentient can we add an attempted murder charge to Kent's sentence?
    He order a missile launch with hostile intent even when everyone else realized The Giant is no longer a threat

    • @Flakjacket96
      @Flakjacket96 Рік тому +89

      Sadly, only humans are given protection under the law which means no matter how sentient a creature is they have no protection.

    • @kraevorn7483
      @kraevorn7483 Рік тому +23

      @@Flakjacket96 something tells me I doubt he’d be punished for the launching a nuke because it did not involve the president in fact that a lot of protocols were probably breached

    • @TheShinyFeraligatr
      @TheShinyFeraligatr Рік тому

      I dunno, given all his other crimes, they might make up precedent that the Giant counts as human, simultaneously fucking Mansley over more but also semi-absolving the Giant of its actions (given all recordings of the incident it's reasonable to state it was acting in self-defense or the defense of family, and while it's not American, it'd probably get acquitted anyway)

    • @doge_sevens
      @doge_sevens Рік тому +20

      Funny thing is for all they knew the giant was atomized so it wouldn't count as "attempted" murder

    • @mizu7662
      @mizu7662 Рік тому +9

      Pretty sure the legal system doesn't consider sentient machines to count as people yet.

  • @Shadowkey392
    @Shadowkey392 Рік тому +920

    Honestly, Harassment of a Minor could probably be overlooked considering how his job as a government investigator pretty much demands he be like that. Intimidation could also be overlooked for similar reasons.
    Also I’m pretty sure you missed a few charges. For example, subverting the General’s authority by ordering a missile launch. Also possibly falsifying a situation report when telling him the Giant killed a kid.

    • @NostalgicGamerRickOShay
      @NostalgicGamerRickOShay Рік тому

      And not a single government agent to this day has ever been charged for the mass murder that happened at Waco Texas.

    • @SalinaMoonfall
      @SalinaMoonfall Рік тому +116

      This, that last scene he basically did a speed run of so many court martial offenses.

    • @joedingo7022
      @joedingo7022 Рік тому

      @@SalinaMoonfall he really did do a "see how fast you can get in front of a firing squad"
      falsifying intelligence + treason + desertion in the space of 5 minutes is pretty impressive

    • @danielgioiosa9845
      @danielgioiosa9845 Рік тому +70

      It's the manner in which he kept after Hogarth that makes it harassment of a minor.

    • @rose.isnotavailable
      @rose.isnotavailable Рік тому

      yeah, theres a right and wrong way to go after someone and that nonstop weasely behavior absolutely fits the bill for straight up harassment @@danielgioiosa9845

  • @curtisleblanc5897
    @curtisleblanc5897 Рік тому +225

    The part where he gets pissed off and keeps smashing the telephone down. . . .
    That's how you know this is a Brad Bird movie.

    • @ZeldaSam1
      @ZeldaSam1 Рік тому +9

      I'll take your word for it.

  • @superzilla784
    @superzilla784 Рік тому +410

    There is no doubt he actually did get all of this after the movie ended. he launched a nuclear missile without permission and tried to leave everyone to save himself. life in federal prison is the best he could hope for in America. in other countries, he would be executed for such a massive crime of nearly bombing an entire town, killing thousands. no one is going to let him just walk away after that.

    • @MeepChangeling
      @MeepChangeling Рік тому +108

      No. He'd have been exicuted in the field without trial. He did it in front of a general in the 1950s my man. He doesn't get a trial.

    • @seantaggart7382
      @seantaggart7382 Рік тому +26

      Yeah
      The general would be like: YOU SET OFF A NUCLEAR MISSILE!

    • @battybuddy
      @battybuddy Рік тому +6

      Not that a trial would have done ANY good. XD@@MeepChangeling

    • @wodekw6862
      @wodekw6862 Рік тому +10

      He gets a trial, martial court in the forest ​@@MeepChangeling

    • @NotAGoodUsername360
      @NotAGoodUsername360 Рік тому

      He launched a nuke on American soil during the fucking Cold War.
      The General probably took him out back and shot him.

  • @baconberries8097
    @baconberries8097 Рік тому +152

    I never really hear about how effective of an antagonist he is! He's a perfect opposite to the Iron Giant in the way that the Giant wants to be Superman while Kent thinks he already is.

    • @DarknessIsTheTruth
      @DarknessIsTheTruth Рік тому +13

      Kinda ironic, isn't it?

    • @fuckoff5893
      @fuckoff5893 9 місяців тому +7

      And his name is Kent. lol.

    • @ANP4158
      @ANP4158 6 місяців тому +6

      He’s more like the Lex Luthor while the Giant is the Superman

    • @ALJ9000
      @ALJ9000 5 місяців тому +2

      @@ANP4158 Complete with red hair

    • @gagejohnathan9641
      @gagejohnathan9641 2 місяці тому +1

      People have pointed out that Kent looks remarkably similar to Clark as well.

  • @legogeneralgreivous8651
    @legogeneralgreivous8651 10 місяців тому +159

    I love how mansley saying “screw our country” is what gets him slapped with a treason charge and not the fact that he launched a nuclear warhead at a populated US civilian target

    • @PlumpProductions-wj3jp
      @PlumpProductions-wj3jp 9 місяців тому +32

      To be fair, this was set during the cold war. Saying stuff like that in that time period could get you in trouble.

    • @pedrofromrio645
      @pedrofromrio645 7 місяців тому +3

      @@PlumpProductions-wj3jp Especially because of his position.

    • @PlumpProductions-wj3jp
      @PlumpProductions-wj3jp 7 місяців тому +2

      @@pedrofromrio645 yup

    • @danolantern6030
      @danolantern6030 Місяць тому

      Also, the whole “launching a nuclear warhead at a populated US civilian target” would probably be another charge entirely

    • @anonymousanonymous3012
      @anonymousanonymous3012 26 днів тому

      In the 1999 animated film *The Iron Giant,* there are notable inaccuracies regarding the depiction of the USS Nautilus and the procedures for launching a nuclear missile.
      *Depiction of the USS Nautilus:*
      The film portrays the USS Nautilus as a fleet ballistic missile submarine capable of launching nuclear missiles. In reality, the USS Nautilus (SSN-571), launched in 1954, was the world's first operational nuclear-powered submarine but was designed as an attack submarine armed with torpedoes, not ballistic missiles. The U.S. Navy's first fleet ballistic missile submarines, equipped with missile-launch capabilities, did not become operational until the early 1960s.
      *Nuclear Launch Protocols:*
      The film suggests that a single, panicked command could initiate a nuclear missile launch. In reality, U.S. military protocols for launching nuclear weapons involve multiple layers of verification and authorization to prevent accidental or unauthorized launches. During the 1950s, while specific procedures have evolved over time, the decision to launch a nuclear weapon would have required clear communication, confirmation codes, and authorization from the highest levels of government, typically the President. The process is designed to ensure that such a grave decision is deliberate and authenticated.
      *Potential Consequences for the Submarine Captain:*
      Given the strict protocols surrounding nuclear weapons, a submarine captain who launched a nuclear missile based solely on an unverified, panicked command would likely face severe repercussions, including the possibility of a court-martial. The military emphasizes strict adherence to protocol to maintain control over nuclear arsenals and prevent catastrophic mistakes.
      In summary, while *The Iron Giant* is a work of fiction, its portrayal of nuclear launch procedures and the capabilities of the USS Nautilus does not align with historical realities.

  • @holyheretic3185
    @holyheretic3185 Рік тому +137

    I love how based on order, Canadians is MORE outlandish than Martians.

    • @musicaleuphoria8699
      @musicaleuphoria8699 9 місяців тому +14

      It's like another planet up there.

    • @A-Microwave
      @A-Microwave 9 місяців тому +10

      @@musicaleuphoria8699 As a Canadian, can confirm

    • @redninja0078
      @redninja0078 7 місяців тому +2

      Yeah, like, what did Canada do?

    • @joaquinalvarez5301
      @joaquinalvarez5301 6 місяців тому +3

      I mean…
      Have you seen their warcrimes???

    • @icicle_ai
      @icicle_ai Місяць тому +1

      ??

  • @winterweasel425
    @winterweasel425 Рік тому +521

    I'm like... 90% sure usage of nuclear weaponry counts as a warcrime...
    Or I guess a crime against humanity since there's no conflict.

    • @SuperMonaLisaBros
      @SuperMonaLisaBros Рік тому +43

      Death penalty, for sure.

    • @MeepChangeling
      @MeepChangeling Рік тому

      You have to be a solgier, in a war, in an actively occupied or conflicted zone to be charged with a war crime. Hence the name WAR crime. What you saw there is treason and attempted genocide. For which Kent would have just been shot in the field by that general or one of his men on his orders like INSTANTLY.

    • @NEOSCISSORSJAGUARPRIME
      @NEOSCISSORSJAGUARPRIME Рік тому

      ​@@SuperMonaLisaBrosOR LIFE...AS A GUINEA PIG FOR MILITARY AND MEDICAL EXPERIMENTATION

    • @ChimeraArchive
      @ChimeraArchive Рік тому +25

      Use of a nuclear weapon on a target within a non evacuated civilian population would be considered a war crime because about the only way a nuke could be used is via military actions.
      That said, the original idea of MAD was that both sides of an intercontinental nuclear exchange would probably seek to destroy strategic targets (aka large population centers) in order to destroy any infrastructure needed to support military operations. (Manufacturing, supply lines, food and medical production, personnel, ect)
      All that aside, he's not likely to have to worry about war crime charges because his willingness to abandon his country as an intelligence officer during the Cold War probably just got him a life sentence or a death sentence for treason.

    • @witwunsz4740
      @witwunsz4740 Рік тому +13

      he could've almost started ww3 and sent the entire world up in nuclear flames if the USSR saw the nuclear launch as a hostile action

  • @CliffCardi
    @CliffCardi Рік тому +148

    Remember that the Iron Giant takes place in 1957, just before Civil Liberties started becoming the norm (i.e. Gideon v Wainwright or Miranda vs Arizona), as well as the justice system not really believing children.

    • @potatoreborn7848
      @potatoreborn7848 Рік тому +39

      I mean fair, but counterpoint he launched a nuke against the order's of a superior officer, the child endangerment stuff is the least of his worries seeing he committed Treason and Desertion

    • @mung01re
      @mung01re 11 місяців тому +24

      @@potatoreborn7848 He would be charged for all of it but yeah, only falsely ordering a tactical nuclear strike against a civilian population would matter. The fine and the jail time are irrelevant; Mansley's getting a potassium chloride cocktail.

    • @potatoreborn7848
      @potatoreborn7848 10 місяців тому +19

      @@mung01re nah its the 1950s hes getting the chair much worse tbh

  • @ImmaLittlePip
    @ImmaLittlePip Рік тому +561

    I remember reading on a wiki that someone on the production team said that there was a cut scene of Kent meeting his end at a firing squad
    So canonically Kent is dead

    • @flyiscoolboi4675
      @flyiscoolboi4675 Рік тому +157

      If that's real, it's understandable why it was cut. Despite what's in this movie, that would be just too much, especially for a movie that everyone knew lots of kids would see.

    • @ImmaLittlePip
      @ImmaLittlePip Рік тому +70

      @@flyiscoolboi4675 True I know Brad Burn loves to push his movies to be much darker but yeah that would of been to much

    • @NeoVault_
      @NeoVault_ 10 місяців тому +63

      Considering this took place during the Cold War, and its treason, I'm not surprised by that deleted scene.

    • @WTFisTingispingis
      @WTFisTingispingis 10 місяців тому +14

      _Jesus._

    • @DaKingKayden
      @DaKingKayden 9 місяців тому +25

      @@WTFisTingispingis i wouldve been fine with like a clip after the credits of kent in jail or something, a fucking *firing squad* is a biiiiiit much call me crazy

  • @movespammerguyteam7colors
    @movespammerguyteam7colors Рік тому +98

    The worst part is that he worked for the government and was inappropriately abusing his authority. He became so reckless that he nearly nuked a whole town and tried to escape. I’m surprised “Fleeing the Scene of a Crime” isn’t here too, but treason fits in this case.

    • @Xenomorpheus429
      @Xenomorpheus429 10 місяців тому +1

      kent mansley works for the government? when did he mention that?

    • @movespammerguyteam7colors
      @movespammerguyteam7colors 10 місяців тому +10

      @@Xenomorpheus429 It’s implied that he either works for the FBI or god forbid the CIA. He is the reason the military was called there in the first place.

    • @Xenomorpheus429
      @Xenomorpheus429 9 місяців тому +1

      @@movespammerguyteam7colors it's a joke because he mentions that every other sentence

    • @DylanGarcia1619
      @DylanGarcia1619 8 місяців тому

      @@movespammerguyteam7colors
      “Hey there, scout. Kent Mansley. I work for the governme-“
      *door slam*

    • @rbdaviesTB3
      @rbdaviesTB3 5 днів тому

      @@movespammerguyteam7colors According to the seal on his car's door when he arrives in Rockwell, he works for the fictional Bureau of Unexplained Phenomena. When he tells Marv the Foreman that he can't reveal the particulars of his department, Marv sotto-voices the words, "National Security?"
      Interestingly, the National Security Agency did exist at the time of the movie, 1957 - it was actually established in 1952 - though its existence was kept hush-hush. The joke within US intelligence at the time was that NSA stood for "No Such Agency"

  • @Maniacman2030
    @Maniacman2030 Рік тому +98

    As an intelligence official, you know the CIA took this guy to an open field after the fact and executed him without trial. All for how bad he made them look.That or they black bagged him and locked him somewhere nobody would ever find him. I think the former is the most likely.
    Seeing as it was a small town, the govt paid Garth and other witnesses a visit to ensure nobody would ever talk about the incident, giant, and completely forget about Mansley. The General would probably be the only one allowed to even know what happened. The soldiers were probably given a similar cover-up as the town residents.
    This would be another instance in history for the U.S. Government to cover up and they'd be thankful it happened in a small town and not a giant population center. Kruschev would probably have gotten a phonecall about it to ensure them it wasn't a hostile launch.
    Speaking of that nuke though? If it detonated in the upper atmosphere? The EMP would've knocked out the grid in that town and probably the next one over.

    • @DaKingKayden
      @DaKingKayden 9 місяців тому +17

      they would have sent kent to a fucking secret hell dimension lmao you just dont do this kinda shit without repercussions, he launched a nuke in front of a town and then attempted to flee, being shot would be the least of his worries... not only that, he destroyed (at least what the government would think at the time) a giant war robot filled with advanced alien technology the government could have used in the cold war... imagine the technological capabilities of the giant the government would want

    • @SingleStepStudios
      @SingleStepStudios 2 місяці тому +2

      They built a statue of the giant in the town.

    • @roneherushin4638
      @roneherushin4638 Місяць тому

      Glad I wasn't the only one who thought about the EMP effects but I guess it being the 50's the tech isn't as relied on as it is nowadays.

  • @madvulcan8964
    @madvulcan8964 Рік тому +26

    When I saw this as a kid I automatically got stranger danger vibes by how Mansley treated Hogarth.

  • @ManiacalToaster
    @ManiacalToaster Рік тому +319

    Really good video! Also, when Mansely committed grand theft auto, it was a military vehicle he attempted to steal, so that would include an additional ten years and automatic dishonorable discharge.

    • @silvereye9327
      @silvereye9327 Рік тому +32

      He also assaulted a soldier when he committed grand theft auto. I’m certain that assault of a soldier would make the sentence worse.

  • @Simseh729
    @Simseh729 Рік тому +26

    one thing that always made me laugh was how TERRIBLY Mansley hammered those nails into the window sill

  • @hunterspride18
    @hunterspride18 Рік тому +223

    This is probably the creepiest video yet, considering the low-key abusive relationship with a minor.

    • @Octopugilist
      @Octopugilist Рік тому +66

      Low-key? He kidnapped him, interrogated him, threatened him and his mother, tried to have him killed by the Army and tried to nuke his town.
      Even Voldemort would be shocked

    • @hunterspride18
      @hunterspride18 Рік тому +3

      @@Octopugilist What? You think I disagree with you? You do realize I called this the creepiest video yet, right?

    • @Laissez-faire402
      @Laissez-faire402 Рік тому +27

      ​@@Octopugilist'low-key' is an often abused word on UA-cam, even for things that aren't low-key.

    • @WTFisTingispingis
      @WTFisTingispingis Рік тому +2

      Kent was an absolute slimeball

    • @bluephoenix7565
      @bluephoenix7565 Рік тому +9

      The heck do you consider high-key?!?

  • @peppermillers8361
    @peppermillers8361 Рік тому +231

    This is genuinely amazing. Improves the movie tenfold.

  • @Lux_the_Lost
    @Lux_the_Lost Рік тому +71

    As someone else pointed out, he ordered the launch of a nuke that was targeting the Giant - who, at the time, was standing smack-dab in the middle of a populated town. That order was also not within Mansley's authority to make; that was specifically an order to come from General Rogard, and no one else. To make matters even worse, this movie it set during the period of the Cold War AND it made a point of telling us a Russian satellite was in active orbit. If that satellite had seen the nuke, things could have gotten all kinds of ugly.
    I don't really know where that falls all since it's a pretty unique situation... At best it could fall under impersonation of a superior officer (also tacked on with mass endangerment and insubordination) which constitutes several years' jail time and fines, and at worst it could fall under treason. Either way, he faces hefty charges and an inevitable court-martial, and would most likely end up spending the rest of his days behind bars (and that's assuming a treason charge doesn't stick and put him up for execution; treason is an EXTREMELY rare charge in the US, but Mansley's example would be by far the worst ever known).

    • @slyseal2091
      @slyseal2091 Рік тому +15

      The satellite was Sputnik, it only had a radio to confirm it got into space sucessfully.

    • @anonymousanonymous3012
      @anonymousanonymous3012 26 днів тому

      In the 1999 animated film *The Iron Giant,* there are notable inaccuracies regarding the depiction of the USS Nautilus and the procedures for launching a nuclear missile.
      *Depiction of the USS Nautilus:*
      The film portrays the USS Nautilus as a fleet ballistic missile submarine capable of launching nuclear missiles. In reality, the USS Nautilus (SSN-571), launched in 1954, was the world's first operational nuclear-powered submarine but was designed as an attack submarine armed with torpedoes, not ballistic missiles. The U.S. Navy's first fleet ballistic missile submarines, equipped with missile-launch capabilities, did not become operational until the early 1960s.
      *Nuclear Launch Protocols:*
      The film suggests that a single, panicked command could initiate a nuclear missile launch. In reality, U.S. military protocols for launching nuclear weapons involve multiple layers of verification and authorization to prevent accidental or unauthorized launches. During the 1950s, while specific procedures have evolved over time, the decision to launch a nuclear weapon would have required clear communication, confirmation codes, and authorization from the highest levels of government, typically the President. The process is designed to ensure that such a grave decision is deliberate and authenticated.
      *Potential Consequences for the Submarine Captain:*
      Given the strict protocols surrounding nuclear weapons, a submarine captain who launched a nuclear missile based solely on an unverified, panicked command would likely face severe repercussions, including the possibility of a court-martial. The military emphasizes strict adherence to protocol to maintain control over nuclear arsenals and prevent catastrophic mistakes.
      In summary, while *The Iron Giant* is a work of fiction, its portrayal of nuclear launch procedures and the capabilities of the USS Nautilus does not align with historical realities.

  • @arthurcallahan6108
    @arthurcallahan6108 Рік тому +71

    Not to mention that he tried to leave an active Warzone, while on duty, that does count as desertion. That will land you dishonorable discharge, and a minimum of five years in prison. But if it is in an active war like in the Cold War that would result in the death sentence

    • @VaderTheWhite
      @VaderTheWhite Рік тому +11

      The Cold War wasn't an active war. That's why it was a cold war.

    • @brendenhawley2225
      @brendenhawley2225 23 дні тому

      I am not 100% sure legally it counts as desertion, since I think soldiers are allowed to take cover from artillery.
      Through I am not sure if anyone would care, he going down.

  • @Eli_the_fiend
    @Eli_the_fiend Рік тому +58

    3:03 I was also saying to myself "he straight up drugged a child!? " back when I saw this movie for the first time.

  • @TheHylianJuggalo
    @TheHylianJuggalo 10 місяців тому +27

    This movie was probably the most realistic depiction of a Post-WW2 US federal agent ever. Nothing's changed ;)

  • @MarkiplierMeatMuncher8
    @MarkiplierMeatMuncher8 Рік тому +86

    I can't believe Jerma would do all of these

  • @jango7889
    @jango7889 Рік тому +37

    i can't believe conan o'brien would do all of this

  • @cursedryona6265
    @cursedryona6265 Рік тому +81

    I feel like he would have already had treason and the death penalty when he called in a nuclear strike on an American town

    • @brendenhawley2225
      @brendenhawley2225 23 дні тому +1

      America has an extremely strict definition of treason, and Manley was not working for an enemy of America or waging war vs America.
      That does not mean he not getting life in prison at best.

  • @hkayakh
    @hkayakh 10 місяців тому +10

    Spoken like a true lawyer. You did him dirty, just like Saul Goodman intended

  • @Mezcon2
    @Mezcon2 Рік тому +132

    This was actually quite enlightening and kind of funny. Good work!

  • @OnlineFox
    @OnlineFox Рік тому +156

    Could he also be held accountable for any military personnel killed during the Giant's rage from his false report of the giant being hostile?

    • @flyiscoolboi4675
      @flyiscoolboi4675 Рік тому +15

      Well, I don't think any soldiers were actually killed. They all seemed to escape.

    • @ZeldaSam1
      @ZeldaSam1 Рік тому +6

      I CERTAINLY HOPE SO!!!!!

    • @reptiliannoizezz.413
      @reptiliannoizezz.413 Рік тому +31

      @@flyiscoolboi4675 Something tells me they would've been killed had it not been a family movie

    • @flyiscoolboi4675
      @flyiscoolboi4675 Рік тому +8

      @nathanward.413 Oh yeah most definitely.

    • @slyseal2091
      @slyseal2091 Рік тому +3

      He was only informed of the giant not being hostile when they got into the town I believe, which is also a huge wrench in the gear for all the charges he would receive - the man didn't know anything and was intentionally not informed by the people that knew he was friendly. All he knew was that he was a the frontline of an alien/"soviet" invasion.
      I know militaries prefer giving higher ups the benefit of the doubt, but from an outsider perspective he could also claim the general had gone insane, stopping all resistance _after_ the green alien nuke thing was fired. Something along the lines of endangering the greater public, maybe claiming that he did it because _he_ was scared of having a nuke land on him.
      At least that's how I would spin it.

  • @reptiliannoizezz.413
    @reptiliannoizezz.413 Рік тому +190

    Fellow inmates: Go on. *Pick up that soap.*

    • @ethancox9737
      @ethancox9737 Рік тому +6

      What does that mean?

    • @reptiliannoizezz.413
      @reptiliannoizezz.413 Рік тому

      @@ethancox9737 (It's a prison rape joke. Victim drops soap while in the communal shower, bends down to pick it up, and that's when the horny inmate strikes)

    • @thunderpantz
      @thunderpantz Рік тому +36

      Pick. It. Up.

    • @swiftstreak98
      @swiftstreak98 Рік тому

      ​@@ethancox9737It means Manless (I mean mansley) is about to become someone's bitch

    • @AFishInPajamas
      @AFishInPajamas Рік тому +34

      Inmates? Bro's committed so many severe felonies he definitely has his own exclusive isolated cell at this point.

  • @GenericProtagonist7
    @GenericProtagonist7 Рік тому +37

    To be fair, up until the confrontation between the military and the giant; he was a single agent dealing with an alien force that has shown destructive tendencies against natural formations and civilian infrastructure, a lot of if not all of those charges would be dropped the moment Mansley was able to prove the giant exists. If he stopped there, stepped back, and let the military handle it from their then even when they realize the giant is trying to be friendly Mansley would still probably get off scot free and probably even get recognition for it.
    He really should've stopped when he was ahead because he genuinely won the moment he proved himself right, all he had to do was cash his chips and bounce but he just kept pushing his luck.

    • @GamingWithNikolas
      @GamingWithNikolas Місяць тому +1

      True to an extent I'd say. He might be able to weasel his way out of charges like many government higher ups do. But the moment he had a nuclear warhead launched at am American town that is full of both USA soldiers and civilians, I don't think anyone could weasel out of that

  • @GuardianRyanRG92
    @GuardianRyanRG92 Рік тому +49

    With all these charges if they were brought into account, Mansley can kiss not only his career, but his own freedom goodbye for the rest of his life.

    • @jccw227
      @jccw227 Рік тому +20

      Well, with the treason charge, he would be kissing his life goodbye as well...

    • @Birthday888
      @Birthday888 10 місяців тому

      ​@@jccw227 Yeah. Mansley almost started World War 3 by launching a nuke based on nothing but fear and glory-hounding. He's dead.

    • @josephdoria5237
      @josephdoria5237 9 місяців тому +5

      @@jccw227Probably his afterlife as well if the big man upstairs has anything to say about it…

  • @gholt39934
    @gholt39934 Рік тому +30

    Mansley was trying to make a name for himself at the expense of others. People like Mansley are always looking for trouble and bite off more than they can chew.

    • @Ragnarra
      @Ragnarra Рік тому +5

      In this case he ended up committing treason. Among other crimes on top of that.

  • @gholt39934
    @gholt39934 Рік тому +42

    Think of Mansley as a Highschool Bully and he poked the bear of the terminator, Rambo, The Predator, Judge Dredd and Conan. When the scary people don't bother you, leave them alone.

    • @ronnycollins9125
      @ronnycollins9125 Рік тому +2

      Sometimes the bear has to use its anger to LASH OUT at the bully to get him to leave it alone. I know from experience.

    • @gholt39934
      @gholt39934 Рік тому +1

      @@ronnycollins9125 There's a difference between dears and bears.

    • @ronnycollins9125
      @ronnycollins9125 Рік тому +1

      @@gholt39934
      Sorry, typo.

  • @Kevin-ek1su
    @Kevin-ek1su 2 місяці тому +7

    One more crime to add is when he caused a wreck driving away from Maine once he saw the giant hovering over Rockwell

  • @Mrstealth93
    @Mrstealth93 Рік тому +25

    I believe a charge for overruling General Rogards direct order to only await and accept his orders about authorizing nuclear launch is something that also can be added to Mansley`s count of laws broken, whichever way that is described, unless its already covered.

    • @anonymousanonymous3012
      @anonymousanonymous3012 26 днів тому

      In the 1999 animated film *The Iron Giant,* there are notable inaccuracies regarding the depiction of the USS Nautilus and the procedures for launching a nuclear missile.
      *Depiction of the USS Nautilus:*
      The film portrays the USS Nautilus as a fleet ballistic missile submarine capable of launching nuclear missiles. In reality, the USS Nautilus (SSN-571), launched in 1954, was the world's first operational nuclear-powered submarine but was designed as an attack submarine armed with torpedoes, not ballistic missiles. The U.S. Navy's first fleet ballistic missile submarines, equipped with missile-launch capabilities, did not become operational until the early 1960s.
      *Nuclear Launch Protocols:*
      The film suggests that a single, panicked command could initiate a nuclear missile launch. In reality, U.S. military protocols for launching nuclear weapons involve multiple layers of verification and authorization to prevent accidental or unauthorized launches. During the 1950s, while specific procedures have evolved over time, the decision to launch a nuclear weapon would have required clear communication, confirmation codes, and authorization from the highest levels of government, typically the President. The process is designed to ensure that such a grave decision is deliberate and authenticated.
      *Potential Consequences for the Submarine Captain:*
      Given the strict protocols surrounding nuclear weapons, a submarine captain who launched a nuclear missile based solely on an unverified, panicked command would likely face severe repercussions, including the possibility of a court-martial. The military emphasizes strict adherence to protocol to maintain control over nuclear arsenals and prevent catastrophic mistakes.
      In summary, while *The Iron Giant* is a work of fiction, its portrayal of nuclear launch procedures and the capabilities of the USS Nautilus does not align with historical realities.

  • @Nando75549
    @Nando75549 8 місяців тому +6

    The Iron Giant: *Eats Mansely's car*
    Mansely: *"... And I took that personally-"*

  • @TBone4Breakfast
    @TBone4Breakfast 9 місяців тому +3

    This is the US military during the Cold War. That stunt with the nuke would have absolutely gotten him the death penalty.
    Like another comment said, he is such a massive liability that at least a few agencies would probably bury him before he ever saw a day in court

    • @anonymousanonymous3012
      @anonymousanonymous3012 26 днів тому

      In the 1999 animated film *The Iron Giant,* there are notable inaccuracies regarding the depiction of the USS Nautilus and the procedures for launching a nuclear missile.
      *Depiction of the USS Nautilus:*
      The film portrays the USS Nautilus as a fleet ballistic missile submarine capable of launching nuclear missiles. In reality, the USS Nautilus (SSN-571), launched in 1954, was the world's first operational nuclear-powered submarine but was designed as an attack submarine armed with torpedoes, not ballistic missiles. The U.S. Navy's first fleet ballistic missile submarines, equipped with missile-launch capabilities, did not become operational until the early 1960s.
      *Nuclear Launch Protocols:*
      The film suggests that a single, panicked command could initiate a nuclear missile launch. In reality, U.S. military protocols for launching nuclear weapons involve multiple layers of verification and authorization to prevent accidental or unauthorized launches. During the 1950s, while specific procedures have evolved over time, the decision to launch a nuclear weapon would have required clear communication, confirmation codes, and authorization from the highest levels of government, typically the President. The process is designed to ensure that such a grave decision is deliberate and authenticated.
      *Potential Consequences for the Submarine Captain:*
      Given the strict protocols surrounding nuclear weapons, a submarine captain who launched a nuclear missile based solely on an unverified, panicked command would likely face severe repercussions, including the possibility of a court-martial. The military emphasizes strict adherence to protocol to maintain control over nuclear arsenals and prevent catastrophic mistakes.
      In summary, while *The Iron Giant* is a work of fiction, its portrayal of nuclear launch procedures and the capabilities of the USS Nautilus does not align with historical realities.

  • @Romanticoutlaw
    @Romanticoutlaw Рік тому +35

    if I know mansley, he loves two things: his country, and child safety. The first almost as much as the second

    • @LordTyph
      @LordTyph Рік тому +8

      "...he said, lying as easily as he breathed."

    • @Cacowninja
      @Cacowninja Рік тому +1

      "Screw this country I want to live!"
      He doesn't love his country and he treated Hogarth like trash and almost nuked everyone including children so he doesn't care about children either.
      Also if kid wants to have a mischievous but peaceful giant alien robot then let him.

    • @ACoalitionGuy
      @ACoalitionGuy Рік тому +2

      There's only a single lie in what you said.

    • @GamingWithNikolas
      @GamingWithNikolas Місяць тому

      ​@@CacowninjaYah, that's the point of the comment. It was a joke

    • @GamingWithNikolas
      @GamingWithNikolas Місяць тому

      Hahahaha

  • @TheRadicalOneNG
    @TheRadicalOneNG Рік тому +17

    5:15 most powerful version of that sound I've heard yet. It's over, this is a good video.

  • @TheJonesChannel11
    @TheJonesChannel11 9 місяців тому +1

    I love how they managed to understand the feelings federal agents have for military generals and vis versa.

  • @xJohnnyBloodx
    @xJohnnyBloodx Рік тому +59

    Some of these crimes might not have existed in the 1950s, or at least the prices wouldn't be as large as they are considering inflation.

    • @Sewblon
      @Sewblon Рік тому

      Which ones?

    • @xJohnnyBloodx
      @xJohnnyBloodx Рік тому +2

      @@Sewblon well i imagine kids didn't have much rights, so harassing a minor might not exist at that time

    • @HelghastStalker
      @HelghastStalker Рік тому +6

      @@xJohnnyBloodx It did.

    • @whuuuut2035
      @whuuuut2035 Рік тому +26

      @@xJohnnyBloodx Even back in the fifties Mansley could be charged with violating Hogarth's 8th Amendment rights if his mom chose to press charges. Having Dean as a witness, along with testimony of his actions with the nuke, those charges would stick.

    • @MeepChangeling
      @MeepChangeling Рік тому

      The entire point of adjusting a currency's value for inflation is to allow us to determine how much something costs at different points in time. This may cause your brain to dribble out of your ears, but a 500 dollar fine in 1950 is the same amount of purchasing power as a 6,370.35 dollar fine today. Being incapable of understanding this is why Boomers are idiots. Their 3.15 an hour minimum wage is worth 17.98 today. But they see federal minimum wage at 7.25 and go "DURR! MORE THAN TWO TIMES WHAT I MADE! MILINIALS ARE LAZY!" when actually, we make less than HALF of what they made...

  • @MinorityRespecter88
    @MinorityRespecter88 9 місяців тому +6

    I feel like up until he kidnapped Hogarth, all of his actions could have been excused in the course of his duties as a Federal agent.

  • @samdavid5772
    @samdavid5772 Рік тому +9

    You forgot that in lying to the general about a matter that serious, he has also incited panic as well as filed a false report

  • @lordseelenfresserdemonking1168
    @lordseelenfresserdemonking1168 9 місяців тому +2

    Kent: FIRE THE MISSLE!!
    officer in the sub: uhhhh launch codes sir?
    Kent: oh shit

  • @whuuuut2035
    @whuuuut2035 Рік тому +13

    Let's not forget he's breaking interrogation law every time he speaks to Hogarth without his mom either present or giving permission, though he doesn't have to warn him of his rights since this was before the Miranda case and the adoption of the Miranda Laws. Though he IS breaking the eighth amendment by forcibly drugging him in the barn and shoving him around at the diner

  • @ethanosaurusrex
    @ethanosaurusrex 3 місяці тому +3

    This villain almost destroyed an entire town before the giant sacrificed itself.

  • @EdwardEstacado
    @EdwardEstacado Рік тому +22

    4:11 does this count as impersonating a general of the United States army? which I'm sure is also illegal 🤣🤣🤣

  • @nugget0928
    @nugget0928 Рік тому +7

    It’s kind of wild that at a certain points he’s effectively not being punished for his crimes because he’s already got thousands of years.

  • @brianmoyachiuz905
    @brianmoyachiuz905 Рік тому +5

    Kent Mansley: LAUNCH THE MISSLE NOW!
    Palpatine: It is treson then.

  • @cosmicredeemer3109
    @cosmicredeemer3109 29 днів тому +1

    Firing a Missile at the Giant and causing 7,000 counts of Second Degree Attempted would be upgraded to Mass Murder which would give Mansley an War Crimes charge. I’m pretty sure a War Crimes charge holds a life sentence or a death row penalty.

  • @StephenMckeighen
    @StephenMckeighen Рік тому +38

    This is a lofty and complicated request, but one you may find interesting since I think it'd meld well in this format:
    "Every Christian sin Emperor Belos (The Owl House) committed"

  • @dragonspear570
    @dragonspear570 5 місяців тому +1

    4:28 The loud thud in conjunction with the massive numbers adding to his crimes absolutely sent me 😂😂😂

  • @Collato
    @Collato Рік тому +26

    I mean, entertaining video but I’ve always been curious on what Mansley would actually be charged with, “launch the missile now.” His argument would be fear and making a mistake but just like the giant his actions could be pegged as a Russian spy or terrorist. Honestly, I think the darkest aspect of this movie is thinking what did happen to Mansley cause you know it would have been far worse than life in prison or even sentenced to death.

    • @Nxtl68
      @Nxtl68 Рік тому +2

      Mansley doesn't have the authority to order a nuclear strike so he would have been in deep trouble.

    • @barrag3463
      @barrag3463 Рік тому +8

      A lot of stuff at the end of the film would probably be lumped under "Insubordination" and "Treason," and other people pointed out that since this is early cold war it's not unlikely the agencies he works for would be so displeased with his level of performance that they'd liquidate him as an asset.

    • @paulmahoney7619
      @paulmahoney7619 5 місяців тому

      I believe he could be charged with high treason, even if launch authority had been legally seconded to General Rogard he would be ordering a launch under false pretenses by acting in a way that would make the sub crew think that there was a conflict going on. Firing a nuke at the US under false pretenses would most definitely meet the criteria of ‘levying war against (the United States)’ as outlined in the Constitution.

    • @anonymousanonymous3012
      @anonymousanonymous3012 26 днів тому

      In the 1999 animated film *The Iron Giant,* there are notable inaccuracies regarding the depiction of the USS Nautilus and the procedures for launching a nuclear missile.
      *Depiction of the USS Nautilus:*
      The film portrays the USS Nautilus as a fleet ballistic missile submarine capable of launching nuclear missiles. In reality, the USS Nautilus (SSN-571), launched in 1954, was the world's first operational nuclear-powered submarine but was designed as an attack submarine armed with torpedoes, not ballistic missiles. The U.S. Navy's first fleet ballistic missile submarines, equipped with missile-launch capabilities, did not become operational until the early 1960s.
      *Nuclear Launch Protocols:*
      The film suggests that a single, panicked command could initiate a nuclear missile launch. In reality, U.S. military protocols for launching nuclear weapons involve multiple layers of verification and authorization to prevent accidental or unauthorized launches. During the 1950s, while specific procedures have evolved over time, the decision to launch a nuclear weapon would have required clear communication, confirmation codes, and authorization from the highest levels of government, typically the President. The process is designed to ensure that such a grave decision is deliberate and authenticated.
      *Potential Consequences for the Submarine Captain:*
      Given the strict protocols surrounding nuclear weapons, a submarine captain who launched a nuclear missile based solely on an unverified, panicked command would likely face severe repercussions, including the possibility of a court-martial. The military emphasizes strict adherence to protocol to maintain control over nuclear arsenals and prevent catastrophic mistakes.
      In summary, while *The Iron Giant* is a work of fiction, its portrayal of nuclear launch procedures and the capabilities of the USS Nautilus does not align with historical realities.

  • @anonymousanonymous3012
    @anonymousanonymous3012 26 днів тому +1

    In the 1999 animated film *The Iron Giant,* there are notable inaccuracies regarding the depiction of the USS Nautilus and the procedures for launching a nuclear missile.
    *Depiction of the USS Nautilus:*
    The film portrays the USS Nautilus as a fleet ballistic missile submarine capable of launching nuclear missiles. In reality, the USS Nautilus (SSN-571), launched in 1954, was the world's first operational nuclear-powered submarine but was designed as an attack submarine armed with torpedoes, not ballistic missiles. The U.S. Navy's first fleet ballistic missile submarines, equipped with missile-launch capabilities, did not become operational until the early 1960s.
    *Nuclear Launch Protocols:*
    The film suggests that a single, panicked command could initiate a nuclear missile launch. In reality, U.S. military protocols for launching nuclear weapons involve multiple layers of verification and authorization to prevent accidental or unauthorized launches. During the 1950s, while specific procedures have evolved over time, the decision to launch a nuclear weapon would have required clear communication, confirmation codes, and authorization from the highest levels of government, typically the President. The process is designed to ensure that such a grave decision is deliberate and authenticated.
    *Potential Consequences for the Submarine Captain:*
    Given the strict protocols surrounding nuclear weapons, a submarine captain who launched a nuclear missile based solely on an unverified, panicked command would likely face severe repercussions, including the possibility of a court-martial. The military emphasizes strict adherence to protocol to maintain control over nuclear arsenals and prevent catastrophic mistakes.
    In summary, while *The Iron Giant* is a work of fiction, its portrayal of nuclear launch procedures and the capabilities of the USS Nautilus does not align with historical realities.

  • @ImTheTrashmann
    @ImTheTrashmann Рік тому +3

    Mansely launched a nuclear strike (Defying the General's orders, I might add) on populated U.S soil during the cold war. (The Iron Giant takes place in 1957)
    Mansley was DEFINITELY executed.

  • @bioengboi137
    @bioengboi137 3 місяці тому +2

    3:55 this went over my head at Hogarth’s age: Kent is desperate to stop the Giant
    As an adult, I was thinking, “I know he hates the giant, but is he trying to k¡ll a kid right after Dean said ‘the Giant has the kid’? why else would he immediately lie to his boss unless he’s completely blinded by pride/jealousy”

    • @bioengboi137
      @bioengboi137 3 місяці тому

      70k fine, life in prison, and death row:
      1957 (present) + 81 - 30 (current age?) = death of Kent, ~2008

  • @mrtortoise3766
    @mrtortoise3766 10 місяців тому +4

    Every man on that submarine is getting court martialed

    • @dickc.normous6369
      @dickc.normous6369 6 місяців тому

      Bruh tbe giant had just launched a fucking green sun after being immune to all conventional weapons they had every right to think it'd killed the general and Mansley was in charge now

  • @speedracer2008
    @speedracer2008 4 місяці тому +2

    To add another crime, albeit a minor one, Mansley's rant in the restaurant would also constitute disturbing the peace, considering he's acting in a loud and aggressive manner that makes the patrons (including Hogarth) uncomfortable.

  • @Azraelmaximilian
    @Azraelmaximilian Рік тому +78

    Pretty sure alot of these wouldn't count given that he's a government agent and alot of this is allowed as part of his job.

    • @reptiliannoizezz.413
      @reptiliannoizezz.413 Рік тому +37

      Well, the treason charge *would* count, no?

    • @PunnySnuck
      @PunnySnuck Рік тому +50

      ​@@reptiliannoizezz.413
      Yes that is True
      The treason charge would more then likely nullify his status as a government agent
      Leaving him vulnerable to the minor changes

    • @yolomcswaggens9482
      @yolomcswaggens9482 Рік тому +31

      @PunnySnuck "Minor charges"
      *Indirectly nukes town*

    • @reptiliannoizezz.413
      @reptiliannoizezz.413 Рік тому +3

      @@PunnySnuck Is that a thing? Prosecuting someone for things they did in a time when they were allowed to?

    • @PunnySnuck
      @PunnySnuck Рік тому +23

      @@reptiliannoizezz.413 I mean
      He's going to get a life sentence at the least and at the most a death penalty for hijacking military orders which could have led to thousands of lives being lost

  • @MrXertiv
    @MrXertiv Місяць тому +1

    *Attempted degree murder, 7,000*
    Mansley's lawyer: .... JESUS CHRIST MAN

  • @Shadow96532
    @Shadow96532 10 місяців тому +4

    0:50 Could that also be considered Disturbing the Peace?

  • @iantaggart3064
    @iantaggart3064 26 днів тому +1

    That's assuming his superiors ever find out about 90% of his wrongdoings. But then again, calling in a nuke alone would get him in prison for life at best.

  • @Orca19904
    @Orca19904 Рік тому +7

    They could also possibly charge him with destruction of government property for crashing the jeep he stole. If the damage exceeds $100 (which I'm sure it would, even in 1950's dollars), the defendant is looking at a fine of $250K and/or 10 years in prison.

  • @supermemoluigi
    @supermemoluigi Рік тому +2

    4:29 this one is more like attempted genocide, and that's 20 years in prison and a $1 million fine. This is if no one dies as a result of the attempted genocide, If someone dies as a result of the attempted genocide, the sentence can be execution or life in prison, plus a $1 million fine (idk if The Giant should count on this one).
    with that correction, this would be a total of 1,069,500 fine + 101.5 years + death (if we don't count the giant as a death as a result, if it counts, then it will be a total of 2,069,500 fine + 81.5 years + life sentence + death)

    • @jarskil8862
      @jarskil8862 Рік тому

      Genocide means systematic plan to kill X ethnic group
      Mass murder is different

  • @kingcamelot1395
    @kingcamelot1395 Рік тому +4

    Best case scenario for Mansley, he spends the rest of his life in a federal prison. At worst, he gets sent to the chair.

  • @botcharles1193
    @botcharles1193 9 місяців тому +1

    Not to mention that at the end he essentially attempted to go AWOL, not sure how much that would add to his sentence

  • @NostalgicGamerRickOShay
    @NostalgicGamerRickOShay Рік тому +36

    The first several charges would be dismissed due to his political connections.
    Not a single FBI agent was ever punished for the mass murder at Waco Texas. And that's just one example.

    • @Ashes-and-Shards
      @Ashes-and-Shards Рік тому +15

      For more examples of how the US government handles criminality within its ranks, check out the sentences for the Utah POW Massacre, Yumiko-chan Incident, My Lai Massacre, and Abu Ghraib Prison.
      Hint: expect the sentences to be light and then commuted as soon as the public isn't looking.

    • @colt-_-jonson1743
      @colt-_-jonson1743 Рік тому

      wife and kids are free game

    • @VaderTheWhite
      @VaderTheWhite Рік тому

      ​@@Ashes-and-Shardsyeah, but none of those are ordering the launch of a nuke on an American town without the authority to do so, especially during the Cold War. Yeah, maybe the government won't be overly public about those events, but I doubt he'd escape justice for that.

  • @MatchaTheVibeking
    @MatchaTheVibeking Місяць тому +1

    Its incredible how much Kent, a basically average guy with very little power is one of my most hated villains. He probably wouldn't have falsey ordered the missile launch, if it wernt for the Giant giving him that look that said "you lose." 4:09 - 4:10 you can see how insulted Kent is by the look. In that moment, his own life and 7000 others didnt matter. He just couldnt stand to lose.

    • @yep1486
      @yep1486 26 днів тому

      nah, he Kent would do it anyway, his ego is too fragile

    • @MatchaTheVibeking
      @MatchaTheVibeking 25 днів тому +1

      @@yep1486 I dont know, right after the general made it clear he was going to call of the missile, kent just looked anxious and defeated. He could have kept arguing and grabbed the radio right there, but it wasn't until after the Giant's look that he snapped. I think this was done intentionally to show that even when all good reason is out on the table, its Kent's pettiness that ultimately won him over.

  • @justincarawan-carawanco.pu1639

    2:26 That part has always been curious to me. Would the new rules apply to only Annie and Hogarth or to *all* single-parent families? If the latter, it seems to me that no court would allow such an adjustment for fear of flooding an already over-crowded system with children.

  • @benjamindavey4782
    @benjamindavey4782 Рік тому +1

    Technically 4:31 would be a crime against humanity under international law as opposed to "mere"- if we can call it mere- second degree murder. The death penalty would be an option if this was real.

  • @ResidentSimonHawaiiPartII_
    @ResidentSimonHawaiiPartII_ Рік тому +10

    1:31 Wouldn’t he also get a false imprisonment charge for holding him captive?

  • @ferr.6109
    @ferr.6109 11 місяців тому +2

    I like how at first the prison years build up to a number small enough to realistically outlive and then they just skyrocket after the missile

  • @halbarroyzanty2931
    @halbarroyzanty2931 10 місяців тому +4

    The CIA definitely did unspeakable things to this man after the movie

  • @RobertWWD
    @RobertWWD Місяць тому +1

    To be fair the General was on board with Kent Mansely’s insanity till the Rocket was targeting everyone in Town.

  • @jameshubacher2585
    @jameshubacher2585 Рік тому +12

    I thought it would be give to take into account that people used to be able to do more to a minor legally in the 50s but since you pointed out treason yeah good to know Mansley is in the greatest trouble of any villain.

    • @flyiscoolboi4675
      @flyiscoolboi4675 Рік тому +4

      Maybe the intimidation and yelling, but he LITERALLY CHLOROFORMED HIM. That would probably be a charge.

    • @survivorofthecurse717
      @survivorofthecurse717 Рік тому

      Any villain ever? Unlikely

    • @kolyashinkarev7366
      @kolyashinkarev7366 Рік тому

      ​@@flyiscoolboi4675if you manage to prove it somehow

    • @jameshubacher2585
      @jameshubacher2585 10 місяців тому +1

      @@survivorofthecurse717agreed. I just meant good to know he was most likely sentenced to death after they got him in custody.

  • @BunnyJolf
    @BunnyJolf 9 місяців тому +2

    Also I'm pretty sure he'd get a death sentence for using nuclear weapons during a time of peace

  • @christopherlmoo
    @christopherlmoo Рік тому +22

    4:29 you mean attempted genocide and a death penalty?

    • @erwin101
      @erwin101 Рік тому

      Don't forget the fact that nukes have massive fallout, killing and poisoning god knows how many people. 7000 attempted second degree murders are NOT taking in the property damage and long term after effects so Mansley got off easy

    • @AtlyswithaY-tv3iz
      @AtlyswithaY-tv3iz Рік тому

      Attempted Mass murder. Not genocide

  • @noahhaupt5343
    @noahhaupt5343 9 місяців тому +1

    Mansley was most likely executed by firing squad immediately after the giant sacrificed himself to stop the nuke. This movie took place in the 50s when the red scare was at its peak and considering he launched a nuclear war head on american soil and attempted desertion, there wouldn't have been a trial or imprisonment.

    • @charliecoccia8875
      @charliecoccia8875 5 місяців тому

      There's a deleted scene where that happened. It was cut for obvious reasons.

  • @Jedigrandmaster6637
    @Jedigrandmaster6637 Рік тому +9

    4:59 “It’s treason then…”

  • @anthonyjamesvasquez
    @anthonyjamesvasquez 7 місяців тому +2

    In Manley's own words, he can do anything he wants whenever he wants if he feels it's in the people's best interest - meaning his own. And he's right - the only difference between the government and criminals is the crimes the government commits are legal. Of course, this is a movie, so for entertainment value, they have to imply that Mansley will face consequences for his actions. But in real life, even if he did face consequences, everything would be covered up.

  • @SirAsdf
    @SirAsdf Рік тому +3

    Mansley would be sent to Guantanamo and unpersoned by the government if he tried that shit.

    • @charliecoccia8875
      @charliecoccia8875 5 місяців тому

      This was set in the 50s during the cold war. Mansley would be dead before he even gets sent to Guantanamo.

  • @christopherwockenfuss8452
    @christopherwockenfuss8452 5 місяців тому +2

    Kent Mansley should have been called Luthor Mansley.

  • @HolyknightVader999
    @HolyknightVader999 Рік тому +3

    I'd reckon some Cold War generals would've been mighty pissed that Mansely's efforts led to the fact the Iron Giant will never become a weapon against Communism. Those generals would've wanted that robot to decimate the Viet Cong or the North Koreans. I can imagine that Kent Mansely would wind up somewhere between the firing squad and the electric chair.

    • @justice8718
      @justice8718 Рік тому

      With him, he pretty much has a testamony about a paranormal entity with unknown orgins. It's not like he pulled this up for the assumption that someone is a spy or not. In his eyes, the Iron Giant could literally be full of atomic weapons and destroy entire states by itself.

  • @deathtoll5000x
    @deathtoll5000x 10 місяців тому +2

    Mansley wouldn't have even seen the inside of a courtroom...

  • @Spoomis
    @Spoomis 10 місяців тому +3

    Also, attempted desertion, which is another fine and at least 5 more years in prison.

  • @DantheToonMan
    @DantheToonMan Рік тому +1

    Three acts of child battery, two acts of property damage, and a partridge in a pear tree.

  • @alexoblivion9295
    @alexoblivion9295 Рік тому +3

    The happy ending that movie deserved, really

  • @dumb.luck36
    @dumb.luck36 Рік тому +1

    it doesnt matter what he did before. as soon as he wrongly launched a missile on his fellow soldiers location as well as the ENTIRE TOWN OF CIVILIANS he was without a doubt executed via firing squad and that same day most likely. this dude was unhinged before this incident happened.