They dont have any interest in catching pea-doh-files . . But making money by turning a 35mph driver into a dangerous criminal is their TOP PRIORIRITY 👍
Scary ... Even scarier the fact that she convinced that she's "helping our community"! _«Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the_ - insert your country here - _where men were free»_
Just as worrying for our education system, she said, "Yer know, yer know, Amin (Onetime dictator of Uganda) Amin, Yer know, Amin, Yer know, yer know, yer know, Amin." The very Moody Jeff said that "Every day 5 people die on our roads and 84 are seriously injured ....... SO, it is never 4 or 6 (he said 5 EVERY day) and it is always 84 are seriously injured. It is never 82 or 81 or 93, just 84 EVERY day the same. He said that 5 die on our roads but what about the seriously injured ? Where they injured in garden sheds or were they attacked by hooligans in a park or where they seriously injured as a result of sexual acrobatics in kitchens and upsetting chip pans (council houses only) as a consequence ? He did not say. I know it may spoil the spontaneity, but the advice should have been to place the chip pan on a back ring with the handle well out of the way How about, "Latest statistics suggest that an average of 5 people WERE killed and an average of 84 people WERE seriously injured per day over the previous 12 months". By the way, Ronny Reagan's script writers did a good job for him. He was incapable of stringing more than 5 words together in a coherent sentence. He was undoubtedly fed with, "There yer go agen (again)" through his earpiece. Here is Ronny's legacy, ua-cam.com/video/mRICAFzPDHs/v-deo.html What prat thought it was appropriate to stick that railway up on that grossly ugly framework. Would you live there. America ...... one of the very worst Third-World countries.
@@terryhoath1983 Averaged. 30,660 injured, 1,825 killed or, in more common (newspeak) parlance "over 30, 000 injured and nearly 2,000 killed on our roads every year". Out of a population of over 67 million, that means 0.0489% dead or severely injured -- the vast majority not dead. Making a change of 0.05% is worth all this? When you consider how many people drive to and from work every single day, the fact the numbers are astonishingly low shows that the majority of drivers aren't doing anything that's a problem 99% of the time. This is about making cash out of drivers, AGAIN.
@@socratesrocks1513 1929, was the year in which the anti-car campaign began. Edgar Algernon Robert Gascoyne-Cecil, Ist Viscount Cecil of Chelwood along with a trouble-making journalist named Thomas Foley founded the "Pedestrians' Association". It morphed itself in 1952 into the "Pedestrians' Association and became known as the "Pedestrians' Association for Road Safety" and morphed itself again into a subversive organisation which calls itself, "Living Streets". In Truro, the A39/A390 by-passes the town centre as a duel-carriageway. One day, about 30 years ago (Oh YES, I remember it well), an old man lost control of his car and caused it to smash into the metal fencing hidden in the hedge on the central reservation. The cause of this bizarre behaviour was that the old man suffered a heart attack. He was found dead clutching at his chest. He had a heart condition for which he was on medication. His body appeared to be undamaged and the car was not badly damaged. He had the heart attack and died BEFORE hitting the railings. During a post mortem, it was discovered that his heart showed all the usual signs of a violent and painful fatal heart attack. The death certificate gave the cause of death as "Heart Attack". Regardless he was added to the stats as a road death. Lies, damned lies ..... and statistics. School buses in Cornwall are mobile zoos. A double decker was used on one particular route which allowed for all kinds of hi-jinks. A bunch of thugs picked up a boy regularly bullied and used him as a battering ram against the right front windows. The force was intensified as, aware that something was going on upstairs, the driver started to slow the bus to stop it at a suitable place so that he could go up and read the Riot Act. Before he could stop the bus, the horrified driver saw the poor boy fall in front of his windscreen and he ran over the boy. The boy's death was included in the road deaths for that year.
I found that out when an energy company sent me a letter with an admin fee of £19.84, cos I didn't pay a bill I couldn't afford LOL (not paying out of principle now!)
@@gillhall7590 We need as many people as possible to open their eyes and realise what the government are doing to us. Together we are stronger. We are the 99% Go to rallies, put out posters, join relevant groups ( SITP e.g) tell others, but do SOMETHING!
@@J00Ls You can charge for your time as well. Send a letter with an invoice for your time replying to their letter. Charge them the same fee and suggest you call it quits or next time your fee will be doubled. Check online for a template and legal notes.
@@ronnietexan thank u for ur good advice! Unfortunately since standing up for human rights, it appears I hav issues accessing resources which are put there to help! I'm gonna wait til they send someone to my door. Much easier in person!
It's because the police have become auditors, they can't prosecute anyone without a name and an address in a database somewhere. Nobody registers to become a burglar which is why they are not prosecuted.
Just remember that it is the tax payer that pays for the surveillance that these so called, public servant, are placing on the tax payer. You own the cameras and laws are meant to benefit you.
I can see how much safety they bring to our roads, as a great 27 years of driving experience and no fault accidents throughout, going to another extreme after seen frequently mobile speed cameras and other new cameras focusing my attention to the speedometer! I definitely agree it can cause more accidents than anything else! What a lie! Pure cash grab scheme!!!
Big Brother Strikes Again ! Considering most road users can barely afford a new car and mainly use the car for going to and from work, this is just another way in which to relieve cash strapped motorists of even more money. I suspect they don’t want us on the roads at all.
The is zero correlation between 'being cash strapped' and being able to fasten a seat belt, and not use your phone while driving. There is a strong correlation between bad driving behaviour and being fined for it. Don't want to pay a fine. Wear a seatbelt and don't drive like a twat.
In fairness it's check mate to the ones who hate white people. They spent over 20 years mass importing immigrants into the country and paying off people in power to do so. Knowing full well that those MPs don't have a hope of ever getting back into power once their plan is complete. Meanwhile white men who now have woke up to this horror are far too late. Most are old and have little fight in them other than to write an angry message on UA-cam. We look down to our pampered children who are making tiktoks and sipping on Starbucks and are in total disbelief that we made these people what they are, and we have no chance of them being able to stand up to what's happening to us now, and not even that, most of the time, our low T children support what's happening like lambs to the slaughter.
Nobody does maas surveillance quite like the UK. This will be for road pricing. It will be brought in to replace fuel duty. That means our cars (and us) being tracked 24/7.
@@alanbrown7155 I'm talking more long term Alan, as petrol and diesel cars are (sadly) phased out. If they bring this in for petrol and diesels then that will be disgraceful. Surely they cannot expect someone to pay road tax, fuel duty and this nonsense as well.
It's NOTHING about 'safety' it's, as you all know, about 'control' and MONEY! They'd do better at fighting crime BUT, that's too hard for the filth to do!!! Always the easy option... fine / fine and MORE fines'!!!
Absolutely. Sending NOP's to motorists doing a few mph over the speed is ALL they're good for these days, and it's not as though they actually catch the speeding motorists themselves is it, but the cameras. They are bloody USELESS.
No right to bring this in sorry this is a fair and free land with a proud history of policing be consent, this is not communist China and I suspect the British people will show you this if you carry on.
You won’t have any road deaths if you’re not allowed a car. Concern for road deaths, zero concern for global excess deaths. Totalitarianism is built on taking away your freedoms “for your safety”.
Bit by bit. Camera by camera. They errode our privacy. If I am conducting my self in a lawful manner, no camera should pry in a fishing expedition. That is what these cameras do. When will dash cams with black boxes have to be fitted to all vehicles to monitor not only the road ahead but the driver as well. Oh, yes my Nissan Leaf already monitors my driving, with data transfer to Nissan and has 360⁰ viewing cameras. Soon our cars themselves will be grassing on us to the authorities. The beauty is we will be paying through our car purchases, for the technology to do so.
My 87 year old neighbour was caught speeding through the same speed camera twice in a month. The poor old girl is a bit forgetful at times. She got away with a speed awareness course in place of prosecution. Shortly afterwards, the camera was necklaced and burnt out. She swears that she knows nothing about it.
@@terryhoath1983 Non UK plates works, The ANPR goes blank, keep below the speed limits do everything right and they will never stop you because they will think it's more trouble than its worth, because they will think you have a non UK licence which means more trouble for them.
I’m getting sick of these people thinking they have the right to inflict whatever imposition on us they wish, just because they believe their goal is noble enough to justify it. Zero road deaths is indeed a noble goal, but then so was zero covid. The question becomes at what cost? If that cost is zero privacy and zero freedom, it’s not one I’m personally willing to pay. We need to bring these characters down a peg or two at elections and somehow start insisting that major decisions like this can only be taken if they were previously declared in election pledges. At least that way they might claim to have public support for such measures.
It doesn't just generate taxes and restrict our freedom and privacy it will ultimately take millions of cars off the roads through loss of licences, the effect of this will kill the motor industry and those built up around it and wreck our already struggling economy just to save a few hundred lives... Do they not see this is a necessary price to pay, we cannot sanitise the world, there needs to be a bit of give and take. Ok the answer could be to push us into electric self driving cars which are governed to not break the law but will they address the issue of children being used and poisoned to mine the raw materials in Africa ..... Get off your high horses people
Presumably the drivers caught during the camera trials will not be prosecuted, otherwise they're not being tested; they're in use. Not sure why they need to be AI cameras - surely any camera can do the same job (unless AI is used to create offences that were not actually committed?).
There is treatment available that you can apply to your windshield to obscure the camera's ability to take pictures of the driver. We are ALWAYS ahead of you big brother.
Yes, but don't you think, when these cameras become widespread, that they will make the application of that treatment to your car windscreen itself an automatic offence?? Also, will things like changing a radio station, or eating /drinking something whilst driving, which can also be equally distracting, become offences? Furthermore did you not notice when the reporter stated that the aim was to reduce car accident deaths by half by 2040.If you know anything about the WEF globalist agenda which BOTH our main political parties/leaders are signed up to there won't be any cars on our roads, or only very few, because private car ownership will have been BANNED. If you, and I'm afraid the millions of people like you, are still ignorant of the utterly NIGHTMARISH future this govt, and govts, literally the world over, are planning for their citizens, I suggest you do some research as a matter of urgency, and as a matter of note, do not think for one second that Starmer will be the solution. If he wins the next GE, we really ARE doomed. Sunak is 'The Great Reset' lite compared to what Starmer and the Labour Party will do. The aim is a 'one world government' and to this end, on a national level the Con. Party has taken a most definite shift to the left to the point that, on certain policies such as taxation and immigration, they are virtually indistinguishable from Labour. This, I have to say, is my opinion, but I think there is a good case for arguing it. Political experts/commentators say(with, imo, something like feigned horror) that Sunak, because of the mentioned above (amongst others) unConservative policies, he has all but 'cooked his goose' as regards the next GE. I really don't think he cares, on the contrary, that's what he's working towards, because in a one party state (on a national level, as part of the above-mentioned one world govt) the Conservatives and Labour will simply merge to become that one party. What is a one party state...... A TYRANNY/DICTATORSHIP. I realise I've totally strayed from the original subject matter of the vid, but the most definite aim to ban private car ownership, as merely one facet of this globalist agenda, kind of leant itself to me doing that. Finally, there is no such thing as a climate crisis or climate change. They are merely our and other govt's conscripts to facilitate the implementation of this one world govt, by spreading lies, propaganda and fear amongst the public into complying with the lockdowns, mandates, rules etc such as we had during Covid, and which, incidentally, they are planning to reimpose. They were a gauge as to what extent the public would comply with such draconian rules, and the public FAILED, in that the majority went along with them without thinking for themselves; the same as they did with the totally new, not properly tested, the pharma immunity from liability in the event of serious complications (🚩to my way of thinking) type of vxine.Covid was the initial phase of this globalist agenda. Climate channge is the latest phase, but, simply put, it's about maintaining that level of fear in the public by the use of lies/disinformation, scaremongering,and propaganda into continuing to comply with whatever mandates, diktats, rules the govt are like to impose upon us. Ignorance about all of this is, most definitely, NOT bliss.
Bicycles will be faster than vehicles soon 20mph put into hamlets,30-40mph on the way out other villages 30mph just done to make money while many hard working folk are paying the price.time for the motorist to stop work put their feet up and let those in charge do some work for a change instead of hiding behind cameras.
Wales is already going to be 20MPH - and on nearly every road - if an A road has housing - tough 20! There will be absolute chaos when no-one will be able to get out of towns and villages onto the main roads.
So, you're going to drive along without your seatbelt on, just to stick it to The System - but keep a sharp eye out for a camera so that you can quickly put the belt on before they nick you? Just put your seatbelt on, you daft bugger!
They don't care because they follow every rule, They wear face nappies, take experimental drugs and stop having sex when told too, They are shallow empty people, who don't have any soul, it's not problem saying it, because they you can not bother a ticket machine 🙂
It is called revenue raising. Clearly NOT safety as despite supposedly doing something wrong or dangerous you are permitted to keep driving. We had a case in Australia where a driver was snapped supposedly speeding, ran a red light 15 minutes later and hit another car. How did the camera make things safer? F-ing BS all of it.
people speed to make up for lost time thanks to all the existing cameras. the smart motorway cameras and these sneaky cams atop lamposts simply hamper everyday life, they don't prevent accidents
This intrusive camera just shows that humans are NOT robots. I would argue that if drivers are uptight and not relaxed and comfortable, then that in itself will make them, ultimately, more dangerous on the roads not less so. How long before AI invades our homes?
Bring it on!, I drive at 5 to 10 mph below the speed limit these days, Sometimes I enjoy driving at 20 mph it's so relaxing, The Uk does not have a minimum limit on the motorway, Ireland has 30 mph, So I tend to do 45 to 50 mph on the motorway. slower when safe to do so. I think it's best to give up on the rat race before they fine and tax you to death, more and more people are now walking away from jobs, the country, than ever before, this is part of the reason why.
People have loads a money to move,the middle class you might say.The class decide bigger than ever.Then wherever people move the local usually poor is priced out of their native homes.It’s wrong
I've stopped holidaying in Devon & Cornwall. The traffic congestion is a PITA. It's more relaxing to stay at home these days and avoid the stress of an anonymous speeding fine dropping through the letter box. Don't get me started on the sewage in the sea and parking tickets for every beach from Ilfracombe to Land's End. 😂
Why does the money never stay in the local area to improve roads i.e pot holes overgrown hedges, extra police on the beat etc etc etc. Why does the money go straight to the Chancellor in london. Well ?
And what would constitute a ‘distracted driver’ hmm? A driver who is actually distracted by their phone or whatever, or would a driver who simply blinked at the wrong time receive a fine as well?
"We've had 1500 offences already within 2 weeks, which isn't great," says Police & Crime Commissioner Alison Hernandez. The same Alison Hernandez who embarrassingly (for her) was in the local papers only a few years ago while still in the role of Police & Crime Commissioner as having been done for speeding.
Another silly surveillance scheme, I fail to see how a silent static camera placed in any area can physically tell a driver in their cars that's they are distracted and to tell them to slow down and take a break.
the police are very efficient at the moment , i went past a camera van the other day doing 35 , i got a letter 24 hours later . thats how quick the police respond ....
Exactly my thoughts. I’ve travelled the world and despite the potholes we have some of the safest roads, they’re making money by pretending there’s a problem that needs fixing.
Im noticing a shift on gb news to a far less objective reporting of news items that will impinge on our liberties. Like this item ,where is the adverse viewpoint on something that is a severe inroad into our freedoms, just read the comments and you can see how out of touch the pundits are.
The Police have nothing better to do, they don't investigate real crime like attacks.
They dont have any interest in catching pea-doh-files
.
.
But making money by turning a 35mph driver into a dangerous criminal is their TOP PRIORIRITY 👍
They will definitely eliminate traffic deaths by 2050 as nobody will be able to afford to drive a car.
And the EV's will not be allowed to plug in or there will be no more batteries.
@@SlimTortoise Let us reduce the maximum stay on motorway services to one hour. When there is a queue for the chargers, that will bugger them.
@@SlimTortoisesilent cars will knock down many more
@@Jack-fs2im Yep, I stick to my 21 year old Merc diesel thanks 🙂
@@terryhoath1983 Flogging could help too 🙂
Yeah, not evil at all. They went from speed to "the prosecutorial side of things." They aim to break humans through oppression.
👍. Creating Onkel Klaus's 'more angry world' day in and day out.
Scary ...
Even scarier the fact that she convinced that she's "helping our community"!
_«Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the_ - insert your country here - _where men were free»_
She's want a breath test before every road journey wtf lol
Just as worrying for our education system, she said, "Yer know, yer know, Amin (Onetime dictator of Uganda) Amin, Yer know, Amin, Yer know, yer know, yer know, Amin." The very Moody Jeff said that "Every day 5 people die on our roads and 84 are seriously injured ....... SO, it is never 4 or 6 (he said 5 EVERY day) and it is always 84 are seriously injured. It is never 82 or 81 or 93, just 84 EVERY day the same. He said that 5 die on our roads but what about the seriously injured ? Where they injured in garden sheds or were they attacked by hooligans in a park or where they seriously injured as a result of sexual acrobatics in kitchens and upsetting chip pans (council houses only) as a consequence ? He did not say. I know it may spoil the spontaneity, but the advice should have been to place the chip pan on a back ring with the handle well out of the way
How about, "Latest statistics suggest that an average of 5 people WERE killed and an average of 84 people WERE seriously injured per day over the previous 12 months".
By the way, Ronny Reagan's script writers did a good job for him. He was incapable of stringing more than 5 words together in a coherent sentence. He was undoubtedly fed with, "There yer go agen (again)" through his earpiece.
Here is Ronny's legacy, ua-cam.com/video/mRICAFzPDHs/v-deo.html
What prat thought it was appropriate to stick that railway up on that grossly ugly framework. Would you live there.
America ...... one of the very worst Third-World countries.
@@terryhoath1983 Averaged. 30,660 injured, 1,825 killed or, in more common (newspeak) parlance "over 30, 000 injured and nearly 2,000 killed on our roads every year". Out of a population of over 67 million, that means 0.0489% dead or severely injured -- the vast majority not dead. Making a change of 0.05% is worth all this? When you consider how many people drive to and from work every single day, the fact the numbers are astonishingly low shows that the majority of drivers aren't doing anything that's a problem 99% of the time. This is about making cash out of drivers, AGAIN.
@@socratesrocks1513 1929, was the year in which the anti-car campaign began. Edgar Algernon Robert Gascoyne-Cecil, Ist Viscount Cecil of Chelwood along with a trouble-making journalist named Thomas Foley founded the "Pedestrians' Association". It morphed itself in 1952 into the "Pedestrians' Association and became known as the "Pedestrians' Association for Road Safety" and morphed itself again into a subversive organisation which calls itself, "Living Streets".
In Truro, the A39/A390 by-passes the town centre as a duel-carriageway. One day, about 30 years ago (Oh YES, I remember it well), an old man lost control of his car and caused it to smash into the metal fencing hidden in the hedge on the central reservation. The cause of this bizarre behaviour was that the old man suffered a heart attack. He was found dead clutching at his chest. He had a heart condition for which he was on medication. His body appeared to be undamaged and the car was not badly damaged. He had the heart attack and died BEFORE hitting the railings. During a post mortem, it was discovered that his heart showed all the usual signs of a violent and painful fatal heart attack. The death certificate gave the cause of death as "Heart Attack". Regardless he was added to the stats as a road death. Lies, damned lies ..... and statistics.
School buses in Cornwall are mobile zoos. A double decker was used on one particular route which allowed for all kinds of hi-jinks. A bunch of thugs picked up a boy regularly bullied and used him as a battering ram against the right front windows. The force was intensified as, aware that something was going on upstairs, the driver started to slow the bus to stop it at a suitable place so that he could go up and read the Riot Act. Before he could stop the bus, the horrified driver saw the poor boy fall in front of his windscreen and he ran over the boy. The boy's death was included in the road deaths for that year.
Man, England lives in a dystopia police state. You guys are living 1984.
I found that out when an energy company sent me a letter with an admin fee of £19.84, cos I didn't pay a bill I couldn't afford LOL (not paying out of principle now!)
We know that thanks? Just tell us how to stop it! Lol
@@gillhall7590 We need as many people as possible to open their eyes and realise what the government are doing to us. Together we are stronger. We are the 99%
Go to rallies, put out posters, join relevant groups ( SITP e.g) tell others, but do SOMETHING!
@@J00Ls You can charge for your time as well. Send a letter with an invoice for your time replying to their letter. Charge them the same fee and suggest you call it quits or next time your fee will be doubled. Check online for a template and legal notes.
@@ronnietexan thank u for ur good advice! Unfortunately since standing up for human rights, it appears I hav issues accessing resources which are put there to help! I'm gonna wait til they send someone to my door. Much easier in person!
Why aren't they spending this money on tackling crime instead of persecuting motorists? 😏
Or the Dover boat people.
It's not profitable...
Motorists are easy to catch.
Low Hanging Fruit.
Easy Targetting.
Both specialities of a police 'service' that is not on the publics side.
It's because the police have become auditors, they can't prosecute anyone without a name and an address in a database somewhere. Nobody registers to become a burglar which is why they are not prosecuted.
Is there any chance they could make cameras to detect drug dealers, burglars or shop lifters?
I’d prefer money was spent on stopping antisocial behaviour and feral kids. Then there’s illegal immigrant just sailing into the country.
That's were the money going
How about going after burglars, corrupt politicians?
surveillance state, cameras everywhere with face recognition and record all ur data and all ur spending tracked aswell
Welcome to China 2.0! 🇨🇳
Just remember that it is the tax payer that pays for the surveillance that these so called, public servant, are placing on the tax payer. You own the cameras and laws are meant to benefit you.
That's rubbish, we own sod all, we're merely serfs for the crown
What happens to the 1.6 billion they take in fines yearly
These cameras will benefit you by reducing the number of bad drivers on the roads. Thank them later!
What on earth is the Uk doing. This is awful.
Politians waging a war on motorists
Nobody would shed a tear if the cameras stopped working.
The woke progressive left would though since they love government oppression and control!
Will they check the drivers social credit score too......seriously what is becoming of this country.
Oh yes ,people will be ordered to stop driving,too poor or been a good global ant.
I can see how much safety they bring to our roads, as a great 27 years of driving experience and no fault accidents throughout, going to another extreme after seen frequently mobile speed cameras and other new cameras focusing my attention to the speedometer!
I definitely agree it can cause more accidents than anything else! What a lie! Pure cash grab scheme!!!
Big Brother Strikes Again ! Considering most road users can barely afford a new car and mainly use the car for going to and from work, this is just another way in which to relieve cash strapped motorists of even more money. I suspect they don’t want us on the roads at all.
The is zero correlation between 'being cash strapped' and being able to fasten a seat belt, and not use your phone while driving. There is a strong correlation between bad driving behaviour and being fined for it. Don't want to pay a fine. Wear a seatbelt and don't drive like a twat.
It's never ever been about saving lives, it's always been about control of the motorists. This needs to stop.
In fairness it's check mate to the ones who hate white people.
They spent over 20 years mass importing immigrants into the country and paying off people in power to do so.
Knowing full well that those MPs don't have a hope of ever getting back into power once their plan is complete.
Meanwhile white men who now have woke up to this horror are far too late. Most are old and have little fight in them other than to write an angry message on UA-cam.
We look down to our pampered children who are making tiktoks and sipping on Starbucks and are in total disbelief that we made these people what they are, and we have no chance of them being able to stand up to what's happening to us now, and not even that, most of the time, our low T children support what's happening like lambs to the slaughter.
Totally agree with you 👍
Nobody does maas surveillance quite like the UK. This will be for road pricing. It will be brought in to replace fuel duty. That means our cars (and us) being tracked 24/7.
@@CountryGalB Yes I agree. But if you think they will abolish fuel duty then your mistaken I'm afraid.
@@alanbrown7155 I'm talking more long term Alan, as petrol and diesel cars are (sadly) phased out. If they bring this in for petrol and diesels then that will be disgraceful. Surely they cannot expect someone to pay road tax, fuel duty and this nonsense as well.
Funny that these cameras have such high resolution,but the ones used to detect street crime have grainy images of the offender's and no use in court.
Totally agree, wasting money on new speed camera where crime watch cctv on street is rubbish.
How about fixing those potholes to begin with. Surely it would be safer to drive.
Nothing to do with preventing road deaths. This is all about power through continuous surveillance. Social credit system live in action.
It's NOTHING about 'safety' it's, as you all know, about 'control' and MONEY! They'd do better at fighting crime BUT, that's too hard for the filth to do!!! Always the easy option... fine / fine and MORE fines'!!!
Absolutely. Sending NOP's to motorists doing a few mph over the speed is ALL they're good for these days, and it's not as though they actually catch the speeding motorists themselves is it, but the cameras.
They are bloody USELESS.
Imagine all the extra revenue through the ambush cameras.
1.6 billion a year in fines for the illegal MIGRANTS for hotels
It's just another money-making racket! 😏
They will also be able to see that you are wearing your obedience mask in your own vehicle as mandated by those who claim to support Democracy.
Awwww 👶
Why do you need to wear a mask in your own car?
Democracy must be SEEN to be done haha, Democracy must be seen to be done.
Cus masktards believe their mask only works if you wear YOUR MASK ! 😡
Next up is a brain scanner to determine "wrong think".
Funny how they can 😂clearly see who is in the car yet when someone gets mugged cctv is to grainy shows being mugged is not serious as driving offence
They had drones & everything for people on a walk but can catch the traffickers
Nobody registers to be a mugger so they can't send them a fine through the post. That's the state of modern policing for you.
No right to bring this in sorry this is a fair and free land with a proud history of policing be consent, this is not communist China and I suspect the British people will show you this if you carry on.
You won’t have any road deaths if you’re not allowed a car.
Concern for road deaths, zero concern for global excess deaths. Totalitarianism is built on taking away your freedoms “for your safety”.
Hopefully people will start going around destroying these invasive cameras which cause more accidents than they prevent
Time we stood up to this Nonsense
It's just like Russia in many ways
Watching us but allowing migrants to do what they want! Stick some of these on the beaches on the south coast…
Nothing to do with safety .. just another form of taxation
Can't be a tax if it's voluntary. Don't want to pay? Wear a seatbelt and put your phone in the glove box.
'A whole new level' of oppression...I think we can see who plod are focusing their attacks on...and its not crime...
Bit by bit. Camera by camera. They errode our privacy. If I am conducting my self in a lawful manner, no camera should pry in a fishing expedition. That is what these cameras do. When will dash cams with black boxes have to be fitted to all vehicles to monitor not only the road ahead but the driver as well. Oh, yes my Nissan Leaf already monitors my driving, with data transfer to Nissan and has 360⁰ viewing cameras. Soon our cars themselves will be grassing on us to the authorities. The beauty is we will be paying through our car purchases, for the technology to do so.
The cabin of the vehicle is PRIVATE. It was considered so with celebrities and Princess Diana. So this is actually ILLEGAL.
In which case it is our duty to find a way to thwart this fantastic imposition upon our privacy.
My 87 year old neighbour was caught speeding through the same speed camera twice in a month. The poor old girl is a bit forgetful at times. She got away with a speed awareness course in place of prosecution. Shortly afterwards, the camera was necklaced and burnt out. She swears that she knows nothing about it.
@@terryhoath1983 Non UK plates works, The ANPR goes blank, keep below the speed limits do everything right and they will never stop you because they will think it's more trouble than its worth, because they will think you have a non UK licence which means more trouble for them.
@@SlimTortoise
Good idea, but if old bill see a right hand drive with foreign plates, they'd instantly get suspicious
I think it's about time the taxpayer was involved in these decisions for once.
I’m getting sick of these people thinking they have the right to inflict whatever imposition on us they wish, just because they believe their goal is noble enough to justify it. Zero road deaths is indeed a noble goal, but then so was zero covid. The question becomes at what cost? If that cost is zero privacy and zero freedom, it’s not one I’m personally willing to pay. We need to bring these characters down a peg or two at elections and somehow start insisting that major decisions like this can only be taken if they were previously declared in election pledges. At least that way they might claim to have public support for such measures.
It doesn't just generate taxes and restrict our freedom and privacy it will ultimately take millions of cars off the roads through loss of licences, the effect of this will kill the motor industry and those built up around it and wreck our already struggling economy just to save a few hundred lives... Do they not see this is a necessary price to pay, we cannot sanitise the world, there needs to be a bit of give and take. Ok the answer could be to push us into electric self driving cars which are governed to not break the law but will they address the issue of children being used and poisoned to mine the raw materials in Africa ..... Get off your high horses people
That woman is the dystopian future, be very afraid.
That will clog up the courts 😊😊😊😊
I see many cities crippled with disease and pestilence.
Sanitation is a fragile thing.
Road traffic accidents have never been so low and it has nothing to do with speed cameras according to the RAC
It’s the price of fuel, can’t afford to touch the accelerator.
Presumably the drivers caught during the camera trials will not be prosecuted, otherwise they're not being tested; they're in use.
Not sure why they need to be AI cameras - surely any camera can do the same job (unless AI is used to create offences that were not actually committed?).
Welcome to new China...
I wouldn't mind if the police were just as keen to police muggers, rapists and burglars.
and pedos
Trojan horse
There is treatment available that you can apply to your windshield to obscure the camera's ability to take pictures of the driver. We are ALWAYS ahead of you big brother.
Always loop holes, I use a French reg vehicle when I go to the UK. ANPR except 🙂
Are you able to say what this treatment is called and where we can purchase it?
The image they show suggests infrared, it will see through reflective screen coverings.
But bright infrared LED on dash should blind it.
Yes, but don't you think, when these cameras become widespread, that they will make the application of that treatment to your car windscreen itself an automatic offence??
Also, will things like changing a radio station, or eating /drinking something whilst driving, which can also be equally distracting, become offences?
Furthermore did you not notice when the reporter stated that the aim was to reduce car accident deaths by half by 2040.If you know anything about the WEF globalist agenda which BOTH our main political parties/leaders are signed up to there won't be any cars on our roads, or only very few, because private car ownership will have been BANNED.
If you, and I'm afraid the millions of people like you, are still ignorant of the utterly NIGHTMARISH future this govt, and govts, literally the world over, are planning for their citizens, I suggest you do some research as a matter of urgency, and as a matter of note, do not think for one second that Starmer will be the solution. If he wins the next GE, we really ARE doomed.
Sunak is 'The Great Reset' lite compared to what Starmer and the Labour Party will do. The aim is a 'one world government' and to this end, on a national level the Con. Party has taken a most definite shift to the left to the point that, on certain policies such as taxation and immigration, they are virtually indistinguishable from Labour.
This, I have to say, is my opinion, but I think there is a good case for arguing it.
Political experts/commentators say(with, imo, something like feigned horror) that Sunak, because of the mentioned above (amongst others) unConservative policies, he has all but 'cooked his goose' as regards the next GE. I really don't think he cares, on the contrary, that's what he's working towards, because in a one party state (on a national level, as part of the above-mentioned one world govt) the Conservatives and Labour will simply merge to become that one party.
What is a one party state...... A TYRANNY/DICTATORSHIP.
I realise I've totally strayed from the original subject matter of the vid, but the most definite aim to ban private car ownership, as merely one facet of this globalist agenda, kind of leant itself to me doing that.
Finally, there is no such thing as a climate crisis or climate change.
They are merely our and other govt's conscripts to facilitate the implementation of this one world govt, by spreading lies, propaganda and fear amongst the public into complying with the lockdowns, mandates, rules etc such as we had during Covid, and which, incidentally, they are planning to reimpose. They were a gauge as to what extent the public would comply with such draconian rules, and the public FAILED, in that the majority went along with them without thinking for themselves; the same as they did with the totally new, not properly tested, the pharma immunity from liability in the event of serious complications (🚩to my way of thinking) type of vxine.Covid was the initial phase of this globalist agenda. Climate channge is the latest phase, but, simply put, it's about maintaining that level of fear in the public by the use of lies/disinformation, scaremongering,and propaganda into continuing to comply with whatever mandates, diktats, rules the govt are like to impose upon us.
Ignorance about all of this is, most definitely, NOT bliss.
Please tell us what it is
Bicycles will be faster than vehicles soon 20mph put into hamlets,30-40mph on the way out other villages 30mph just done to make money while many hard working folk are paying the price.time for the motorist to stop work put their feet up and let those in charge do some work for a change instead of hiding behind cameras.
Wales is already going to be 20MPH - and on nearly every road - if an A road has housing - tough 20! There will be absolute chaos when no-one will be able to get out of towns and villages onto the main roads.
Maybe it will cause more accidents , due to the fact more people will be looking for cameras , rather than watching the road .
So, you're going to drive along without your seatbelt on, just to stick it to The System - but keep a sharp eye out for a camera so that you can quickly put the belt on before they nick you? Just put your seatbelt on, you daft bugger!
It's for your benefit, health, wellbeing, democracy, freedom blah blah.
Too late. We no longer believe or trust you, for what Good that will do.
These people are nuts, leave us the hell alone.
Notice how all this sh&t is "for our safety" when we know exactly what it's for.
So many NPCs support it every damn time.
O lordy! I do hope the people who are instigating all this big brother stuff, know they're being watched too lol
They don't care because they follow every rule, They wear face nappies, take experimental drugs and stop having sex when told too, They are shallow empty people, who don't have any soul, it's not problem saying it, because they you can not bother a ticket machine 🙂
I always imagined money trees would have more leaves.
Its just another nail in the coffin for motorists and a cash cow
Would be a shame if cameras started getting vandalised all over the country
Spend money solving crime.
I blame the Australian’s, who are speed camera mad. Now we’ve decided that we’re missing out on this ‘cash-cow’
It is called revenue raising. Clearly NOT safety as despite supposedly doing something wrong or dangerous you are permitted to keep driving. We had a case in Australia where a driver was snapped supposedly speeding, ran a red light 15 minutes later and hit another car. How did the camera make things safer? F-ing BS all of it.
Let's call it Skynet.
Im sick of rich people telling me what to do and scamming money out of us!
State surveillance.
"Excuse me, you've been stopped because we believe you may have been thinking and driving.
More taxation on motorists, their short of cash to pay for these migrants who are draining our economy..
Help the comunity by taking there money. What a joke
people speed to make up for lost time thanks to all the existing cameras. the smart motorway cameras and these sneaky cams atop lamposts simply hamper everyday life, they don't prevent accidents
Simply a new challenge for the Bladerunners !
GPS chip on driver licences will be next
This intrusive camera just shows that humans are NOT robots. I would argue that if drivers are uptight and not relaxed and comfortable, then that in itself will make them, ultimately, more dangerous on the roads not less so. How long before AI invades our homes?
Alexa, Siri?
Yeah... more cameras to take out..👀
Bring it on!, I drive at 5 to 10 mph below the speed limit these days, Sometimes I enjoy driving at 20 mph it's so relaxing, The Uk does not have a minimum limit on the motorway, Ireland has 30 mph, So I tend to do 45 to 50 mph on the motorway. slower when safe to do so. I think it's best to give up on the rat race before they fine and tax you to death, more and more people are now walking away from jobs, the country, than ever before, this is part of the reason why.
People have loads a money to move,the middle class you might say.The class decide bigger than ever.Then wherever people move the local usually poor is priced out of their native homes.It’s wrong
It's dangerous to drive at 45 to 50 on the motorway. You should stop doing that.
@@jrobs1133 Its not illegal and it makes a good protest, if they want us to drive as fast as horse and carts then so be it.
@@SlimTortoise You're going to get someone killed. Well done.
UK minimum speed limit on a motorway is 50mph
Its about control and money.
Now they want to look inside your car next be your house no privacy anymore wef fun city’s
I've stopped holidaying in Devon & Cornwall. The traffic congestion is a PITA. It's more relaxing to stay at home these days and avoid the stress of an anonymous speeding fine dropping through the letter box. Don't get me started on the sewage in the sea and parking tickets for every beach from Ilfracombe to Land's End. 😂
Why does the money never stay in the local area to improve roads i.e pot holes overgrown hedges, extra police on the beat etc etc etc. Why does the money go straight to the Chancellor in london. Well ?
Bladerunners ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
This is HORRIBLE…. 🙄
And what would constitute a ‘distracted driver’ hmm? A driver who is actually distracted by their phone or whatever, or would a driver who simply blinked at the wrong time receive a fine as well?
MORE HARASSMENT OF THE POOR MOTORIST - CASH COWS !!!
Police and Crime Commisioner.............Cash Cow more like.
"We've had 1500 offences already within 2 weeks, which isn't great," says Police & Crime Commissioner Alison Hernandez. The same Alison Hernandez who embarrassingly (for her) was in the local papers only a few years ago while still in the role of Police & Crime Commissioner as having been done for speeding.
The hypocrisy is unbearable.
Dystopia sounds like fun🤑
Dystopia....
Another silly surveillance scheme, I fail to see how a silent static camera placed in any area can physically tell a driver in their cars that's they are distracted and to tell them to slow down and take a break.
paintball guns are nice, just saying
Tare them down! They infringe on your privacy!! Come on people wake up!
Like always your perceived safety will only cost you your freedom.
All a CROCK. Just to make money.
And they talk about the surveillance state like it"s a good thing. 🙄
Creepy
the police are very efficient at the moment ,
i went past a camera van the other day doing
35 , i got a letter 24 hours later .
thats how quick the police respond ....
Not really just want to add another way to steal people's money
C. h N a.Unbelievable 🤬
It’s disgusting.
If the number of "crimes" is so high perhaps the law itself is at fault.
No matter. It's profitable surveillance and it is everywhere.
Exactly my thoughts. I’ve travelled the world and despite the potholes we have some of the safest roads, they’re making money by pretending there’s a problem that needs fixing.
Im noticing a shift on gb news to a far less objective reporting of news items that will impinge on our liberties.
Like this item ,where is the adverse viewpoint on something that is a severe inroad into our freedoms, just read the comments and you can see how out of touch the pundits are.
the surveillance State God i'm glad i'm dead in 20yrs
whats the sense in using high tech for everything to make living more secure if you have to suck out the fun of living out of it for that?
It's like living in a straight jacket.
Will it check to make sure we’re not distracted by too many road signs?
1.05 SO ! The cameras being AI are doing all the work. Why are we paying that guy to sit there watching porn on his computer ?