I live in middletown where they make the F-135 and when they do testing (even with noise suppression) you can still faintly hear it roaring a few miles away!
@Tonya Patrick You talking about SpaceX with their falling rockets on farmland. Then yes, that is unsafe. Chinese rocket fell on the ocean. Standard practice and the US has been doing this for decades.
everything starts from reverse engineering...China just start their R&D project few years ago...In the early period when japan start reform,they copy and learn from the west...and see thats how they become one of the leading technology country
Just a note that the aircraft engine's rated speed is more of a range than a fixed number. Other factors including the aerodynamics of the aircraft and the inlet design. The design of the inlet can raise or lower the maximum speed of the aircraft by a whole Mach.
@@taylorc2542 The B-1A and B-1B pretty much has the same engine, but the change from a variable geometry air intake ramp to a fixed geometry one dropped its maximum speed from Mach 2.25 to Mach 1.25.
@@mickeyg7219 They've gotten much better at designing inlets that deliver subsonic air to the fan while being stealthy. In clean sheet designs you can have stealth and speed from fixed inlets, and ramps only deliver marginal improvement. High speed from the B-1B was not at all a priority. It was a stop-gap bomber using a fixed architecture which they shoved out the door.
It doesn't matter how powerful your engine is if the weight of the fighter is heavy look at the typhoon its weight is 11,000 kgs empty but with the two ej200 engines it can reach mach 2+ 1550mph and climb to 62,000 ft in 60seconds. The F35 can't live with that, the f22 engines are more powerful than the typhoon but because f22 is a lot heavier it's about the same speed and climb rate as the typhoon.
Rectification : Sukhoi Su-57 have Izd.30 new engine with 120kN class (27 000lbf) dry and 178kN class (40 000lbf) with afterburner.This aircraft can reach high supercruise mach 2 without afterburner.
This is the best engine for a fighter ever made!! The Russian guys are very smart with the lowest budget than the US government, this is efficiency!! 👍😃
I am a crew chief for the F35A, and it is quite a remarkable engine. I get to do a lot of maintenance on these engines and a lot of it is pretty genius
@@SomeGuy-ti1ln can’t say but a GE would be real nice, I’ve worked on GE engines before and they’re definitely built with maintenance in mind most of the time but P&W made quite a powerful engine and it doesn’t malfunction as much as you’d think.
@@KillingMachineMechanic GE is fine but with mediocre power output. I'd also witnessed over 12 crash of f35 in a decade, most of the crash due to engine malfunction.
@@SomeGuy-ti1ln I get that P&W aren’t the best engines but there’s a lot of redundancy in most aircraft to where they aren’t going to crash. Personally, we take care of our jets here and if an engine malfunctions, it’s mostly on P&W saying the engine is fine even though there’s a crack in the engine, for example. What are your credentials/concrete proof that you’ve witnessed 12 crashes due to engine malfunction?
@@KillingMachineMechanic i'd seen the news of USA planning a new variant for f35 engine so i wemt through f35 accident section and saw american amd korean f35 crash reports indicated engine malfunctions.
I didnt realize the F-35 engine was that powerful, thats cool. I worked on the F110-GE-100 and 129 in the Air Force. Plenty of power for the little F-16 jet.
Yes the F135 is the F119 re-aero'ed Core with a larger diameter low pressure spool for a higher bypass ratio. It has serious thrust. That was a requirement due to the ability to hover land the B model F35.
I see, why the GE F110 was mentioned only from the 100-120kN class US engines and why the PW F100 was left. Yes, the series F110, especially the UAE F-16E/F block 60 engines, the F110GE132 is more powerful than the latest series F100PW229 is. However, if we talk about the really top static thrust comparision between the F100 and the F110 families, there was a hidden candiate. In the late 90's, Pratt developed an ultimate version of the good old F100 to beat the performance of the F110GE129. While the GE was working on the F110GE129 enhanced version, the 145kN thrust class F110GE132 (new blisk fan, new combustion chamber, new turbine, new afterburner system), the Pratt&Whitney also implemented the latest-at-that-time features from the 5th gen F119 engines. It was the F100W229A (later it was called as F100PW232), under the project called "Thunder". The new, longer low pressure compressor section required a shorter afterburner housing to keep the original length of the engine. The new fan has much larger airflow and more: it has a unique 3D airflow design, which not required a variable supersonic inlet to maintain the Mach 2. The acceleration was phenomenal, around 2 sec it could accelerate from idle to max reheat. The thrust was incredible, 165kN, so it was same as the larger F119 had. The F100PW229A was tested on an F-15E Strike Eagle at the Edwards AFB in the summer of 1998. That plane had the same thrust to weight ratio as the famous F-15A Streak Eagle had during the climb record flights in the late 70's.
AL-31F, FL and FP have 122,58kN thurst on afterburner then comes AL-31FM1 and FM3 with 132kN afterburner thurst (used on Su-27SM and SM3) then AL-35 for Su-34 with 135kN afterburner then AL-41F-1S with 145kN afterburner for Su-35S / BM, Su-57 and Su-75
I have a GE washing machine that I got from my grandmother when I moved into my own place it's over 50 yrs. Old and still going strong 👍 Let's see if those other jet engine manufacturer build a washing machine as good as GE . Probably not 😉
The GE J79 jet engine has been around since 1955 and powers the F-4 Phantom amongst other older fighters. The F-4 was retired from fighter duty in the U.S. in 1996 but as of 2021, is still in service in Iran, South Korea, Greece and Turkey.
The leader of my country loves his Rolls Royce limousine so much. When our national airlines bought our 787 Dreamliner, GE offered their GEnx but he insisted on RR Trent 1000 anyway.
I live in Alaska about 20 air miles north of JBER. Right now Northern Edge is going on involving about 240 military aircraft. Yesterday I saw and heard 6 F22s at once and their exhaust was making that supersonic sound. I love it. Also see Blackhawks, C17s, C130s and AWACS. A few weeks ago I saw a formation at altitude refueling to the east. We can see a lot of sky at our home. Mountains 20-25 miles in a easterly direction and up to 100 miles in the west. I worked at PW&A for a few years in the late 70s on the assembly floor. I hear some climbing right now.
yes sir !! I Live in ft worth and f35's fly over my house to land everyday... nothing like it!! Even had the opportunity for me and my 5 year (at the time) daughter to sit in one at a local pilot meet n greet!!
@@bobsink624 The issue with the F135 engine is not about its reliability (the problem about turbine blades got damaged by the sand is old, it has been fixed since), it's about logistics. Kicking Turkey out of the F-35 program resulted in a disrupted supply line. The F135 has about 40% fewer parts than the F100 and F110, so it should be comparatively more reliable.
@@mickeyg7219 thats not what the GAO said: The Government Accountability Office, a Congressional agency, studied flight test data and concluded that the reliability of the F135 engines is “very poor (less than half of what it should be) and has limited” progress for the F-35 program. www.americanmachinist.com/news/article/21898688/us-inspectors-raise-caution-on-f35-engine-program
This is a video about engines in production today. The last D-30 was made sometime around 1993. If we're talking All-Time most powerful the Pratt & Whitney J58 is the most powerful military engine of all time. At the SR-71's cruising speed a J58 was kicking out ~150 kilonewtons, less than the Soviets' D-30 engine... or so Pratt & Whitney says. The J58's highest output spec is beyond 150 kN, we just don't know an exact number. SR-71's have been known to accelerate to speeds 270 miles per hour faster than Lockheed's specified top speed. A D-30 engine basically needs a full rebuild after full afterburner for any length of time longer than 60-90 seconds. A J58 can go full afterburner for hours. They were made to operate at their almost-maximum performance limits for incredibly long periods of time.
as u can see the blackbird uses a different kind of propulsion. It's called ramjet jet engine. In a ramjet supersonic air is supposed to be slowed down to subsonic speed inside the jet engine to produce powerful thrust. And there's a scram jet, in a scramjet the air is intended to move through the engine at supersonic speeds to produced high velocity thrust powerful than a ramjet, but the downside is u need to launch the aircraft in the air at mach 2 and above to fully utilize the engine full capabilities. But there's an topic recently about a jet engine hybrid between ramjet and scramjet technology it is called pulse wave detonation jet engine.
@@nikkotan2840 That's a misconception, while it's common for people, even someone knowledgeable about aircraft to label the J58 engine as a "turboramjet" engine, it's actually a turbojet/turbofan hybrid engine, or more accurately, a variable bypass engine. From 0 to Mach 2, the J58 engine has a bypass ratio of 0, making it a turbojet engine. However, from Mach 2 and above, the bypass ratio of the J58 increase to 0.25 at a maximum speed, making it functions like a turbofan engine. Ramjet doesn't have any turbomachinery, all the air is completely bypassed.
@@mdtransmissionspecialties In the maximum thrust test, the XF9-1, which is scheduled to be installed in the F-3, has a thrust of 11t (110KN) or more without an afterburner and a thrust of 15t (150KN) or more with an afterburner. It boasts performance comparable to the engines installed in the American stealth fighter "F-22" and the Russian "Su-57". In particular, the "turbine inlet temperature", which represents the temperature of combustion gas, is 1800 ° C or higher, which is undoubtedly one of the best in the world.
China's WS10 series is at least on top 5 in that list, and it has vector nozzle, equipped in Chinese J11, J16, J10C and J20. But hey, who cares about what an Indian ranking says? China is just low profile.
@@infoworld7706 there's a saying in hindi for chinese products, "chale toh chaand tak, nahi toh raat tak"... When you figure that out, you'll understand
So? That is not the question being addressed here. No one has said that 2 engines combined are less thrust than a single engine. I don't see your point.
A new version of the engine with 176 kN enters mass production mate this year. It has the best thrust to weight ratio: 12.5 and other six gen characteristics. But, it is not already in mass production just yet so it should not be in the list. I guess F-35’s engine will stay the strongest among fighters since it is the biggest by far. Though the plane cripples it: it can only super cruise for about 50 seconds.
@@StrangerHappened The F135 can super cruise for over a 150 mile "dash". I don't know where you came up with 50 seconds. There would be few circumstances that would require anymore than that for an F35.
@@_Coffee4Closers Did you miss last years testing and regulation on this? “F-35C can only fly at Mach 1.3 in afterburner for 50 cumulative seconds”. Sustained super cruise as well as thrust to weight ratio as well as manoeuvrability are requirements for the fifth generation military fighters. F-35 is in effect only 4+/4++ plane as it fails in most requirements. And this is not a fault of the engine, which is outstanding and on its own perfectly capable of sustained super cruising by design.
You forgot the izdeliye 30 with 178 kN (39,680 lbf) from the Su-57 with afterburner and the most powerful is the NK-32 with 245 kN (55,000 lbf) Tu-160 with afterburner...
@@vasiliyt8600 "except in limited test flights...", which in itself implies that the engine was installed in the aircraft and that the aircraft flew with that engine, which again implies that it is a very existing engine and has every right to be compared to all others engines from the list. Only one functional copy is enough to confirm its existence. The Soviet T-34 and American Sherman were made in tens of thousands of copies, and the German Mouse tank in only one copy, but those numbers will not change the fact that the Mouse was the largest functional tank in WW2. It's the same with this engine, it should and had to be on the list ...
@@avoidwomen6494 SO? NASA did use the RD180, because it was a cheap 2nd stage engine to use, not because it was super high tech. The RD180 is very old technology, it is not anything special. Are you so silly to think that the US could not make an engine like the RD180? Really, you think that? Maybe you have missed Space-X landing rockets back on the pad, or Virgin sending payloads into space, or Blue Origin also sending orbital missions and payloads into space or any of another dozen US Firms sending payloads into space. I think its pretty safe to say that US industry is quite capable of building rocket engines.
@@_Coffee4Closers The USA can only create problems for the world and generate gays. All technologies are from the United States, stolen from others. And who is Elon Musk? The swindler of the century ...
GE developed the F120 For both the F-22 and F-23. Both airplanes were tested with both Pratt and GE engines. The contracts were determined separately and the F119 won, partly because GE’s variable cycle design was seen as too risky.
@@ziggystardust4627 I'm guessing it was more to do with the price per unit? We had one for the F-35 that outperformed the P&W by every measure and it was the price. Then they promised us the STOVL variant but nope. Can't build them in New England and compete w/ right to work states. I dare not mention the location but I bet we are talking about the exact same factory. 2 bureaucrats per production worker.... lol.
@@qjimq I was at Pratt at the time, and it was an IAM union shop (and, to the best of my understanding, still is). Most of the F119 work was in Connecticut, not a right to work state or one that was known for cheap labor. My recollection of the contract award when I was there was that GE tried a variable cycle engine with the F120, which was a risky approach that never had been tried before, unless you want to call Pratt's J58 that powered the SR-71 a variable cycle engine, which it kind of is. So Pratt had more experience on VC engines, but chose a non-VC layout. The USAF felt that GE's VC engine might present more development hurdles, although the technology was promising, and is getting a great deal of attention these days for future "multi-stream adaptive cycle" tactical engines (crewed fighters and drones). Many decisions on the ATF contract award were driven by risk mitigation, and one of the biggest reasons that the F-22 was selected over the F-23 was greater confidence in the ability of LM to deliver vis-a-vis NG, which had burned the USAF on the B-2 rollout. I don't have any special insight into the F135 vs. F136. I'm mostly trying to clear up the statement that the F-23 was developed by GE (it was a Northrop-Grumman airplane), and to explain that the F-119 and F-120 were tested on both the YF-22 and YF-23. There were 4 aircraft, 2 YF-22s (1 GE and 1 P&W) and 2 YF-23s (1 GE and 1 P&W).
@@ziggystardust4627 Right on, thanks for the reply. I didn't even notice the original comment mistake. I just saw GE and knew of the struggles and found your interesting comment. All the workers were pissed about Pratt, they believed it and so did I. Yeah, I bet they switched the F119 right over to the F135 but you went state of the art 1990 to state of the art 2000. We were trying to go job shop '60 to state of the art, lol. I heard they moved my line eventually but who knows, we did hit our mark and hired a bunch of people but it felt like a stop gap and I moved on to fix another line. When you're the ass hole kicking ass to hit a number, they don't like to use their own engineers or keep you around long after. Yeah, NG did screw that up, but you had to give them a shot, it was in their founders DNA. Nice chat bud, keep up the well informed comments. Notice I was asking if it was the price.
GE did not and does not develop Planes... Northrup developed the YF23 and the engines were provided by GE and Pratt & Whitney. The GE engines were inferior to the Pratt offering and were rejected.
It would be an overkill, even if you make a frame that strong the pilot inside is still a human. The G forces that such a plane can do will kill any human.
@@siddharthgoyal4008 that makes no sense. The G forces are in relation to the maneuverability (of acrobatic grade, needed for dogfights) of the plane, not the engines power. Take for instance the SR-71 (high power, low Gs) vs the Gripen (low power, high Gs).
The strongest turbojets (not turbofans) ever are the ones fitted to the russian Tu-160 bomber if my memory serves me they have around 76,000 lbs of thrust.
this are fighter engines, not strategic bomber engines, two different categories you dumpy, and the Kuznetsov NK-32 engine has a 31,000lbf dry-drust and 55,000lbf when using afterburners, so i dont know where your 76,000lbf comes from, the most powerful aircraft engine in the world is the american ge9x which have 110,000lbf of thrust, its non-military engine but still its the most powerful.
The engine for Gripen E which is a derivative from GE F414 is actually also modified and built by Volvo Flygmotor (GKN Aerospace Sweden) and is called RM16 (RM12 for GE 404)
@@alexlo7708 According to the SAAB home page it is the GE F414. I guess GKN just makes some modification to it (and possibly manufacture parts and assemble it!?). Someone with more knowledge might be ale to answer this?
Japan XF-3 engine 5th generation Secret from F-22 Raptor, ATD-X 5th generation with XF-3 engines 5th generation never project.. Japan XF9 is 6th generation with F-3 6th generation aircraft.. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitsubishi_X-2_Shinshin en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitsubishi_F-X
The trust of the PW F135 is amazing and so is the alternative jet engine to the F35 which is the GE/Rolls-Royce F136 because it has 43,000lbs of trust and could be upgraded to 45,000lbs.
@Arthur Humphreysyou are correct! The GE/Rolls-Royce F136 was an alternate engine but it was canceled in 2011 leaving only the F135 for the UK F35B. As for the thrust the F136 engine was comparable to the F135.
@@СергейФедоров-с6щ Keep on dreaming dude! Russian jet engines have less thrust, less reliable, and less fuel efficient! That’s why India chose the GE 404 for the HAL Tejas fighter jet!
@@ivanlagrossemouleYes, they are working on the Kaveri jet engine and in the future it will probably replace the GE 404 engine! You know most jet engine manufacturers like Saturn, GE, PW, and Rolls-Royce have many years of experience in making powerful, efficient, and reliable jet engines. Any new jet engine manufacturer has their work cut out because they just don’t have the experience in engineering!
@@peterneil6859 don't worry dear, trail and error makes perfect💯 acutely developed countries never give there technologies to other country... What about ISRO?
Well the AL 41 used in mig 1.44 is different than al 41 used in su 35 and su57. There's a confusion because there are two engines designated as al41. AL 41 used in su35 and su57 is upgraded version of AL31 while the one used in mig1.44 was a variable cycle engine.
You are comparing apples with oranges ,engines made for twin engined fighters with singles ,plus specific fuel consumption is missing which tells a lot regarding the tech level of the engine and these just scratch the surface !
@@_Coffee4Closers I don't deny it, I mean else. I mean, the very criteria by which ratings are built are often based on what Americans are best at, rather than what Americans are worst at or mediocre at. Do you understand me?) For example, the thrust of the Tu-160M2 engine is 55,000+ lbs And this engine in Russia was developed under the USSR. The Americans still can not create the same for their aircraft.
@@НиколайУльянкин-г6т even russia struggling to recreate some tech from ussr time. For ex engine for t80. Tu160 engine i not sure, seem they successfully rebuild, improve its recently.
@@НиколайУльянкин-г6т mig31, project 971 sub. Those thing even the west dont have any comparable. In fact now back bone of the us airforce is f15, b52. Ye, hollywood tech dominant.
if we are only talking about one engine, as the title says, the most powerful is the Kustnesov nk32 (55,000 ibf) which is put on the Tu 160M bomber.it is the largest and most powerful engine installed on a combat aircraft.
India really needs to overcome this hardle. Indian defence index gonna changed very much only after a suitable reliable indigenous jet engine. Go India go!!!!😀😀😀😀
The IAF did chose to procure Tejas jets, but the service's auditor general criticized the design for failing to meet 53 criteria, including deficiencies in its radar- and missile-warning systems, limited internal fuel, underpowered engine relative airframe weight, and lack of electronic warfare support.05-Feb-2021
Most of the people saying other engines are missing are talking about bomber or commercial jet engines. This is just for fighter engines. I just looked up your M53. It only puts out 21,000 pounds of thrust with the afterburner on. It isn't close to the engines on this list.
@@MessInMines I'll be honest, I skipped toward the end and didn't realize the first few places were that weak. That said, I don't give a shit about an extra 400 pounds of thrust. That is not a powerful engine. It wouldn't even rate in the top 10 most powerful American engines. I am not sure why the low tiers are so underpowered in this vid.
Chinese WS-10A is better than Russian al31-fn and have already equipped with existing fighter jets. More powerful WS-15 which comparable with American f135 is rolling out very soon.
It's the solodiev D30. It pushes the heaviest fighter jet in the world to mach 3, making it also the fastest fighter. It should be in second place on that list. Maybe they didn't include it because they consider the mig 31 an interceptor, but if they consider the F35, wich is almost a manned drone with shitty maneuverability, a fighter; then the mig 31 should be there.
@@Elthenar oh . Yes yes tu22m3 engine bomber but mig31 D30 torbufan engine . I am iranian not russian ، I mixed up the names of the fighters and the bombers. Sorry
There are three exelcent tubrofan engines in China,Trouble also report. FWS10c(渦扇10C) Max thrust :13.2kn Thrust to weight ratio: 7.8 FWS15 Max thrust :18.1kn Thrust to weight ratio: 10.78 FWS19 Max thrust :11kn Thrust to weight ratio: 11
0:18 "A nation like USA have developed advanced engines to compete against countries like Russia and China while these two nations have also started to build a clear technical lead in most aspects of combat aircraft development." Lol okay. Not a single Chinese engine on this list. and all their planes are just copies or iterations of Russia's cold war designs. Russian power units have the worst power to weight on the list. I'm not seeing the clear technical lead China and Russia have in combat aircraft development....This channel sure smells like propaganda to me. Xinnie the Pooh is that you?
Xf9-1 только испытания проходит, как и изделие 30 , на планер еще не поставили, только в планах до 2028 года, на истребитель 5-го поколения, а так да он самый мощный на данное время из двигателей
The Pratt & Whitney F135 and General Electric/Rolls-Royce F136 are both engines that competed to power the F-35: Pratt & Whitney F135 Developed from the F119 engine used on the F-22 Raptor, the F135 produces 28,000 lbf of thrust and 43,000 lbf with afterburner. As of July 2024, Pratt & Whitney has delivered over 1,200 F135 production engines. General Electric/Rolls-Royce F136 The F136 was the first F-35 engine to offer a single engine configuration for all three versions of the aircraft. Rolls-Royce is responsible for the front fan, combustor, stages 2 and 3 of the low-pressure turbine, and gearboxes. The F136 is a twin-spool, axial flow, augmented turbofan that is 221 in long and 48 in in diameter.
*Soloviev D-30* ! 🙄 D30-F6 jet engines, each rated at 152 kN thrust, allow a maximum speed of Mach 1.23 at low altitude. High-altitude speed is temperature-redlined to Mach 2.83 - the thrust-to-drag ratio is sufficient for speeds in excess of Mach 3!.
Supersuperka an air superiority fighter would be an aircraft supreme in both dog fighting and beyond visual range Mig-31 is no dog fighter it’s an interceptor with outstanding BVR capabilities
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Now you can see many defence experts are giving their free lecture in the comment section 😂
😂😂😂
i don't get why people rant about people with an interest to discuss it in a video abou it
Are they for real
Are they for real
@@najibghani5882 what you want to say?
I live in middletown where they make the F-135 and when they do testing (even with noise suppression) you can still faintly hear it roaring a few miles away!
America - We have PRATT AND WHITNEY F135.
Russia - We have SATURN AL-41.
China - we have Ctrl-C & Ctrl-P.😎
Ha ha beautiful reverse engineering 😂😂😂 but they never copy any engine...
*Ctrl-V
I think 🤔🤔 it's windows + print screen
@Tonya Patrick You talking about SpaceX with their falling rockets on farmland. Then yes, that is unsafe. Chinese rocket fell on the ocean. Standard practice and the US has been doing this for decades.
everything starts from reverse engineering...China just start their R&D project few years ago...In the early period when japan start reform,they copy and learn from the west...and see thats how they become one of the leading technology country
Just a note that the aircraft engine's rated speed is more of a range than a fixed number. Other factors including the aerodynamics of the aircraft and the inlet design. The design of the inlet can raise or lower the maximum speed of the aircraft by a whole Mach.
Not nearly a whole mach, but it can make a bit of difference.
Aircraft engines aren’t “rated for speed” they’re rated by power
@@taylorc2542
The B-1A and B-1B pretty much has the same engine, but the change from a variable geometry air intake ramp to a fixed geometry one dropped its maximum speed from Mach 2.25 to Mach 1.25.
@@mickeyg7219 They've gotten much better at designing inlets that deliver subsonic air to the fan while being stealthy. In clean sheet designs you can have stealth and speed from fixed inlets, and ramps only deliver marginal improvement. High speed from the B-1B was not at all a priority. It was a stop-gap bomber using a fixed architecture which they shoved out the door.
It doesn't matter how powerful your engine is if the weight of the fighter is heavy look at the typhoon its weight is 11,000 kgs empty but with the two ej200 engines it can reach mach 2+ 1550mph and climb to 62,000 ft in 60seconds. The F35 can't live with that, the f22 engines are more powerful than the typhoon but because f22 is a lot heavier it's about the same speed and climb rate as the typhoon.
Rectification : Sukhoi Su-57 have Izd.30 new engine with 120kN class (27 000lbf) dry and 178kN class (40 000lbf) with afterburner.This aircraft can reach high supercruise mach 2 without afterburner.
This is the best engine for a fighter ever made!! The Russian guys are very smart with the lowest budget than the US government, this is efficiency!! 👍😃
Correction, these engines don't exist in any Su-57 and are still in development as of today
@@apolloaero production of al51 started last month with new su57 M variant
Lie
Yawn…
I was looking for this kind of video for so long.
I am a crew chief for the F35A, and it is quite a remarkable engine. I get to do a lot of maintenance on these engines and a lot of it is pretty genius
Heard this engine is a failure with frequent malfunction. USA is planning a new variant of it?
@@SomeGuy-ti1ln can’t say but a GE would be real nice, I’ve worked on GE engines before and they’re definitely built with maintenance in mind most of the time but P&W made quite a powerful engine and it doesn’t malfunction as much as you’d think.
@@KillingMachineMechanic GE is fine but with mediocre power output. I'd also witnessed over 12 crash of f35 in a decade, most of the crash due to engine malfunction.
@@SomeGuy-ti1ln I get that P&W aren’t the best engines but there’s a lot of redundancy in most aircraft to where they aren’t going to crash. Personally, we take care of our jets here and if an engine malfunctions, it’s mostly on P&W saying the engine is fine even though there’s a crack in the engine, for example. What are your credentials/concrete proof that you’ve witnessed 12 crashes due to engine malfunction?
@@KillingMachineMechanic i'd seen the news of USA planning a new variant for f35 engine so i wemt through f35 accident section and saw american amd korean f35 crash reports indicated engine malfunctions.
I didnt realize the F-35 engine was that powerful, thats cool. I worked on the F110-GE-100 and 129 in the Air Force. Plenty of power for the little F-16 jet.
It has to be it's doing 2 jobs
Yes the F135 is the F119 re-aero'ed Core with a larger diameter low pressure spool for a higher bypass ratio. It has serious thrust. That was a requirement due to the ability to hover land the B model F35.
@@kevinwiltshire2217 The F-35 is a heavy plane too. When fully loaded, it is going to take a lot of horses to get it off the ground.
ua-cam.com/video/4G28wq5_hWc/v-deo.html
Aircrafts stealth comparison by RCS
American fighter pilots call the F-35 the flying turd
👍❤️ from India...🙏😎😀😍
@Quiet Person he likes this channel's videos, what does it have to do with you?
@Quiet Person stay quiet..........
@Quiet Person yes it becomes real cringe when ever I see love from India
Dirty country 😂
Kk bat eater @@farosrohmangeloraramadan3897
I see, why the GE F110 was mentioned only from the 100-120kN class US engines and why the PW F100 was left. Yes, the series F110, especially the UAE F-16E/F block 60 engines, the F110GE132 is more powerful than the latest series F100PW229 is. However, if we talk about the really top static thrust comparision between the F100 and the F110 families, there was a hidden candiate. In the late 90's, Pratt developed an ultimate version of the good old F100 to beat the performance of the F110GE129. While the GE was working on the F110GE129 enhanced version, the 145kN thrust class F110GE132 (new blisk fan, new combustion chamber, new turbine, new afterburner system), the Pratt&Whitney also implemented the latest-at-that-time features from the 5th gen F119 engines. It was the F100W229A (later it was called as F100PW232), under the project called "Thunder". The new, longer low pressure compressor section required a shorter afterburner housing to keep the original length of the engine. The new fan has much larger airflow and more: it has a unique 3D airflow design, which not required a variable supersonic inlet to maintain the Mach 2. The acceleration was phenomenal, around 2 sec it could accelerate from idle to max reheat. The thrust was incredible, 165kN, so it was same as the larger F119 had. The F100PW229A was tested on an F-15E Strike Eagle at the Edwards AFB in the summer of 1998. That plane had the same thrust to weight ratio as the famous F-15A Streak Eagle had during the climb record flights in the late 70's.
Yea I'm looking for engine for my fighter in the up coming war with China.
D-30f-6 for MiG-31 was not mentioned, though it is most powerful Russian jet for fighters
@@SuperSuperka my be the AMNTK Soyuz R-579MK-300 22 tm is the most powerfull engine for a fighter
AL-31F, FL and FP have 122,58kN thurst on afterburner
then comes AL-31FM1 and FM3 with 132kN afterburner thurst (used on Su-27SM and SM3)
then AL-35 for Su-34 with 135kN afterburner
then AL-41F-1S with 145kN afterburner for Su-35S / BM, Su-57 and Su-75
Ал-35 такого двигателя не существует
Garbage
@@USViper in your deams
@@pablo-iu3lv Go fix me a taco...
@@USViper We didn't even suspect that you were a fan of diarrhea, soy boy... 😂
I have a GE washing machine that I got from my grandmother when I moved into my own place it's over 50 yrs. Old and still going strong 👍
Let's see if those other jet engine manufacturer build a washing machine as good as GE .
Probably not 😉
😂😂😂
You are lucky it's not a Pratt & Whitney washing machine :)
@Master Mariner 😂🤣
The GE J79 jet engine has been around since 1955 and powers the F-4 Phantom amongst other older fighters. The F-4 was retired from fighter duty in the U.S. in 1996 but as of 2021, is still in service in Iran, South Korea, Greece and Turkey.
The leader of my country loves his Rolls Royce limousine so much. When our national airlines bought our 787 Dreamliner, GE offered their GEnx but he insisted on RR Trent 1000 anyway.
I can hear F135 pratt & whitney almost everyday and it sounds so great.
I live in Alaska about 20 air miles north of JBER. Right now Northern Edge is going on involving about 240 military aircraft. Yesterday I saw and heard 6 F22s at once and their exhaust was making that supersonic sound. I love it. Also see Blackhawks, C17s, C130s and AWACS. A few weeks ago I saw a formation at altitude refueling to the east. We can see a lot of sky at our home. Mountains 20-25 miles in a easterly direction and up to 100 miles in the west. I worked at PW&A for a few years in the late 70s on the assembly floor. I hear some climbing right now.
yes sir !! I Live in ft worth and f35's fly over my house to land everyday... nothing like it!! Even had the opportunity for me and my 5 year (at the time) daughter to sit in one at a local pilot meet n greet!!
Funny, I heard the F135 broken down all the time was the reason congress considered to cut down the purchase numbers of F35
@@bobsink624
The issue with the F135 engine is not about its reliability (the problem about turbine blades got damaged by the sand is old, it has been fixed since), it's about logistics. Kicking Turkey out of the F-35 program resulted in a disrupted supply line. The F135 has about 40% fewer parts than the F100 and F110, so it should be comparatively more reliable.
@@mickeyg7219 thats not what the GAO said: The Government Accountability Office, a Congressional agency, studied flight test data and concluded that the reliability of the F135 engines is “very poor (less than half of what it should be) and has limited” progress for the F-35 program.
www.americanmachinist.com/news/article/21898688/us-inspectors-raise-caution-on-f35-engine-program
You forgot the Soloviev D-30F-6, 93KN dry and 152kn Afterburner
Yes
Mig 31!
Now that's an engine.
This is a video about engines in production today. The last D-30 was made sometime around 1993.
If we're talking All-Time most powerful the Pratt & Whitney J58 is the most powerful military engine of all time. At the SR-71's cruising speed a J58 was kicking out ~150 kilonewtons, less than the Soviets' D-30 engine...
or so Pratt & Whitney says. The J58's highest output spec is beyond 150 kN, we just don't know an exact number. SR-71's have been known to accelerate to speeds 270 miles per hour faster than Lockheed's specified top speed.
A D-30 engine basically needs a full rebuild after full afterburner for any length of time longer than 60-90 seconds.
A J58 can go full afterburner for hours. They were made to operate at their almost-maximum performance limits for incredibly long periods of time.
@@CoffeeAndPaul
PRATT & WHITNEY F119 it was produced until 2013
and SR-71 in not the fighter jet
You left the Pratt and Whitney J-58 which powdered th SR-71 “Blackbird” .
Not a fighter though.
@@Stevonoles1 But yet a breakthrough in the field of fighter jet engines.
Or the Russian Mig-31 -> D30K engine.
as u can see the blackbird uses a different kind of propulsion. It's called ramjet jet engine. In a ramjet supersonic air is supposed to be slowed down to subsonic speed inside the jet engine to produce powerful thrust. And there's a scram jet, in a scramjet the air is intended to move through the engine at supersonic speeds to produced high velocity thrust powerful than a ramjet, but the downside is u need to launch the aircraft in the air at mach 2 and above to fully utilize the engine full capabilities.
But there's an topic recently about a jet engine hybrid between ramjet and scramjet technology it is called pulse wave detonation jet engine.
@@nikkotan2840
That's a misconception, while it's common for people, even someone knowledgeable about aircraft to label the J58 engine as a "turboramjet" engine, it's actually a turbojet/turbofan hybrid engine, or more accurately, a variable bypass engine. From 0 to Mach 2, the J58 engine has a bypass ratio of 0, making it a turbojet engine. However, from Mach 2 and above, the bypass ratio of the J58 increase to 0.25 at a maximum speed, making it functions like a turbofan engine. Ramjet doesn't have any turbomachinery, all the air is completely bypassed.
I love America,,America is the first in the world, in every cases 👏👏👏👏👏🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲❤❤❤❤❤❤
don't fool yourself with illusions
Volvo RM8 and RM8B used in the SAAB Viggen-variants ( yes, i know that they are not new anymore ) but still very powerful engines.
Yep will keep accelerating
Japan xf9 engine
Left the chat.
@@mdtransmissionspecialties In the maximum thrust test, the XF9-1, which is scheduled to be installed in the F-3, has a thrust of 11t (110KN) or more without an afterburner and a thrust of 15t (150KN) or more with an afterburner. It boasts performance comparable to the engines installed in the American stealth fighter "F-22" and the Russian "Su-57". In particular, the "turbine inlet temperature", which represents the temperature of combustion gas, is 1800 ° C or higher, which is undoubtedly one of the best in the world.
I don't want to hear boasts. I want to see roasts! The stiletto boasted a projected m2 or higher and look what happened thrre lol
I believe it when i see it but if it exist its probably a copy of american ge engine
China: WRITE THAT DOWN!! WRITE THAT DOWN!!
Hahaha, Totally! Those guys can't make anything themselves.
100% true.
@@adamgt4037 China's newest WS10 can reach 155kN of thrust with afterburner, better than russian's al31
China's WS10 series is at least on top 5 in that list, and it has vector nozzle, equipped in Chinese J11, J16, J10C and J20. But hey, who cares about what an Indian ranking says? China is just low profile.
@@infoworld7706 there's a saying in hindi for chinese products, "chale toh chaand tak, nahi toh raat tak"... When you figure that out, you'll understand
Keep it up best channel for defence lovers👍
Proud to see P&W at the top.
I know it wasn't from a fighter airplane but the absence of the Pratt & Whitney J58 is very noticeable.
Надо помнить, что у F-35 есть только один двигатель с тягой 191kn, а Су-57 имеет два двигателя, по 147kn каждый, что дает суммарную тягу в 294kn
So? That is not the question being addressed here. No one has said that 2 engines combined are less thrust than a single engine. I don't see your point.
@@_Coffee4Closers but you see difference between fighter jet angine and bomber one :))) ROFL
A new version of the engine with 176 kN enters mass production mate this year. It has the best thrust to weight ratio: 12.5 and other six gen characteristics. But, it is not already in mass production just yet so it should not be in the list. I guess F-35’s engine will stay the strongest among fighters since it is the biggest by far. Though the plane cripples it: it can only super cruise for about 50 seconds.
@@StrangerHappened The F135 can super cruise for over a 150 mile "dash". I don't know where you came up with 50 seconds. There would be few circumstances that would require anymore than that for an F35.
@@_Coffee4Closers Did you miss last years testing and regulation on this? “F-35C can only fly at Mach 1.3 in afterburner for 50 cumulative seconds”. Sustained super cruise as well as thrust to weight ratio as well as manoeuvrability are requirements for the fifth generation military fighters. F-35 is in effect only 4+/4++ plane as it fails in most requirements. And this is not a fault of the engine, which is outstanding and on its own perfectly capable of sustained super cruising by design.
You forgot the izdeliye 30 with 178 kN (39,680 lbf) from the Su-57 with afterburner and the most powerful is the NK-32 with 245 kN (55,000 lbf) Tu-160 with afterburner...
Tu 160 isnt Fighter jet
The izdeliye 30 is still a prototype and not used on any plane (except in limited test flights).
Lol fighter engines
Su57 al-41 engines still in prototype lol they suck. America with the new xa101 adaptive cycle engines. 50k plus thrust for fighter
@@vasiliyt8600 "except in limited test flights...", which in itself implies that the engine was installed in the aircraft and that the aircraft flew with that engine, which again implies that it is a very existing engine and has every right to be compared to all others engines from the list. Only one functional copy is enough to confirm its existence. The Soviet T-34 and American Sherman were made in tens of thousands of copies, and the German Mouse tank in only one copy, but those numbers will not change the fact that the Mouse was the largest functional tank in WW2. It's the same with this engine, it should and had to be on the list ...
Mig-31 D30-F6 jet engines, each rated at 152 kN thrust
LOL...
Russia makes engine for nasa
@@avoidwomen6494 SO? NASA did use the RD180, because it was a cheap 2nd stage engine to use, not because it was super high tech. The RD180 is very old technology, it is not anything special. Are you so silly to think that the US could not make an engine like the RD180? Really, you think that? Maybe you have missed Space-X landing rockets back on the pad, or Virgin sending payloads into space, or Blue Origin also sending orbital missions and payloads into space or any of another dozen US Firms sending payloads into space. I think its pretty safe to say that US industry is quite capable of building rocket engines.
@@_Coffee4Closers The USA can only create problems for the world and generate gays. All technologies are from the United States, stolen from others. And who is Elon Musk? The swindler of the century ...
@@renegadevoodoos3978 thanks to USA you are using UA-cam hahaha
I was waiting for these video. Tnq very much. Love from Mumbai, India
GE had also developed Yf23 Black widow. It was very powerful but it didn't go to production.
GE developed the F120 For both the F-22 and F-23. Both airplanes were tested with both Pratt and GE engines. The contracts were determined separately and the F119 won, partly because GE’s variable cycle design was seen as too risky.
@@ziggystardust4627 I'm guessing it was more to do with the price per unit? We had one for the F-35 that outperformed the P&W by every measure and it was the price. Then they promised us the STOVL variant but nope. Can't build them in New England and compete w/ right to work states. I dare not mention the location but I bet we are talking about the exact same factory. 2 bureaucrats per production worker.... lol.
@@qjimq I was at Pratt at the time, and it was an IAM union shop (and, to the best of my understanding, still is). Most of the F119 work was in Connecticut, not a right to work state or one that was known for cheap labor. My recollection of the contract award when I was there was that GE tried a variable cycle engine with the F120, which was a risky approach that never had been tried before, unless you want to call Pratt's J58 that powered the SR-71 a variable cycle engine, which it kind of is. So Pratt had more experience on VC engines, but chose a non-VC layout. The USAF felt that GE's VC engine might present more development hurdles, although the technology was promising, and is getting a great deal of attention these days for future "multi-stream adaptive cycle" tactical engines (crewed fighters and drones). Many decisions on the ATF contract award were driven by risk mitigation, and one of the biggest reasons that the F-22 was selected over the F-23 was greater confidence in the ability of LM to deliver vis-a-vis NG, which had burned the USAF on the B-2 rollout.
I don't have any special insight into the F135 vs. F136. I'm mostly trying to clear up the statement that the F-23 was developed by GE (it was a Northrop-Grumman airplane), and to explain that the F-119 and F-120 were tested on both the YF-22 and YF-23. There were 4 aircraft, 2 YF-22s (1 GE and 1 P&W) and 2 YF-23s (1 GE and 1 P&W).
@@ziggystardust4627 Right on, thanks for the reply. I didn't even notice the original comment mistake. I just saw GE and knew of the struggles and found your interesting comment. All the workers were pissed about Pratt, they believed it and so did I. Yeah, I bet they switched the F119 right over to the F135 but you went state of the art 1990 to state of the art 2000. We were trying to go job shop '60 to state of the art, lol. I heard they moved my line eventually but who knows, we did hit our mark and hired a bunch of people but it felt like a stop gap and I moved on to fix another line. When you're the ass hole kicking ass to hit a number, they don't like to use their own engineers or keep you around long after.
Yeah, NG did screw that up, but you had to give them a shot, it was in their founders DNA. Nice chat bud, keep up the well informed comments. Notice I was asking if it was the price.
GE did not and does not develop Planes... Northrup developed the YF23 and the engines were provided by GE and Pratt & Whitney. The GE engines were inferior to the Pratt offering and were rejected.
I would like to see a fighter using two F-135, maybe the 6th gen plane that already flew.
Flying in the Mojave Desert
It would be an overkill, even if you make a frame that strong the pilot inside is still a human.
The G forces that such a plane can do will kill any human.
@@siddharthgoyal4008 that makes no sense. The G forces are in relation to the maneuverability (of acrobatic grade, needed for dogfights) of the plane, not the engines power. Take for instance the SR-71 (high power, low Gs) vs the Gripen (low power, high Gs).
It’s great to see so many of China’s great jet engine designs in the top 10.
Is Volvo chinese?
@@gabrielmarian698
Shoot forgot about some of their business acquisitions.
Poor Volvo .
@@ernestgiboo9006 they are catching up with WS. J20 and J31 looks good.
@@gabrielmarian698 but still long way to go
@@hekrad the gap is closing fast.
Thanks Again, Good Cool Useful informative Video.
The Izdeliye 30 of the Sukhoi SU-57 and the checkmate.
not in operational yet, it's still in test phase.
That is some great engine tho
The strongest turbojets (not turbofans) ever are the ones fitted to the russian Tu-160 bomber if my memory serves me they have around 76,000 lbs of thrust.
this are fighter engines, not strategic bomber engines, two different categories you dumpy, and the Kuznetsov NK-32 engine has a 31,000lbf dry-drust and 55,000lbf when using afterburners, so i dont know where your 76,000lbf comes from, the most powerful aircraft engine in the world is the american ge9x which have 110,000lbf of thrust, its non-military engine but still its the most powerful.
@@jemzbundzdobo7310 Holy stupid batman, I know the video was about fighter engines
So the Super Hornet's Engine will be used in
Tejas MK-2 ⚡ Thnx for info 👍
These engines are basically modern upgrades of the Orenda Iroquois.
Nobody knows about those.. they are Canadian.
@@kevinkarbonik2928 Yes they're Canadian
@@kevinkarbonik2928 Orenda Canada pioneered the use of titanium in jet engines.
Love you videos !
The new fighter that the Brazilian Air Force acquired from the Swedish Saab Gripen E uses the GE "F-414G" a very strong turnofan! 🔰💪💀🔰
The engine for Gripen E which is a derivative from GE F414 is actually also modified and built by Volvo Flygmotor (GKN Aerospace Sweden) and is called RM16 (RM12 for GE 404)
@@bjornnordstromoh, thanks! 👍😃🔰
@@bjornnordstrom So GE didn't sell them F414??
@@alexlo7708 According to the SAAB home page it is the GE F414. I guess GKN just makes some modification to it (and possibly manufacture parts and assemble it!?). Someone with more knowledge might be ale to answer this?
@@bjornnordstrom The F-414G is the RM-16 Volvo.
Japanese IHI XF9 engine is not mentioned here!
Japan XF-3 engine 5th generation Secret from F-22 Raptor, ATD-X 5th generation with XF-3 engines 5th generation never project.. Japan XF9 is 6th generation with F-3 6th generation aircraft..
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitsubishi_X-2_Shinshin
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitsubishi_F-X
The trust of the PW F135 is amazing and so is the alternative jet engine to the F35 which is the GE/Rolls-Royce F136 because it has 43,000lbs of trust and could be upgraded to 45,000lbs.
@Arthur Humphreysyou are correct! The GE/Rolls-Royce F136 was an alternate engine but it was canceled in 2011 leaving only the F135 for the UK F35B. As for the thrust the F136 engine was comparable to the F135.
In the first place is the Russian engine NK-32
@@СергейФедоров-с6щ Keep on dreaming dude! Russian jet engines have less thrust, less reliable, and less fuel efficient! That’s why India chose the GE 404 for the HAL Tejas fighter jet!
@@Jimbo-qe4gc So India hasn't found an engine for the HAL Tejas yet?
@@ivanlagrossemouleYes, they are working on the Kaveri jet engine and in the future it will probably replace the GE 404 engine! You know most jet engine manufacturers like Saturn, GE, PW, and Rolls-Royce have many years of experience in making powerful, efficient, and reliable jet engines. Any new jet engine manufacturer has their work cut out because they just don’t have the experience in engineering!
Pratt & Whitney J58-P-4 makes 151.24kN It is an afterburning turbojet with a unique compressor bleed to the afterburner.
also forgot NK-32 almost 247 kn
Wasn't that the engine in the SR-71?
We had Kaveri jet engine but there is more improvement required... Let's hope after some time we will get our own engine...
Kaveri engine 😂😂😂😂😂😂 sha----me....lesss in....di....an...
@@peterneil6859 don't worry dear, trail and error makes perfect💯 acutely developed countries never give there technologies to other country... What about ISRO?
Pratt and Whitney factory is being built in Asheville to built the F35 engines, looks like a job change in my future
❤ from USA ☺
USA GAYS LOL
@@ginoomarramirezolivera7605 where you from? Lol
Hey buzz make a video on ISRO s future space projects🤘🏼
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shenyang_WS-10
Jai Hind sister 🙏🏼🇮🇳♥️🇮🇳
Good One !!!
You can be certain the F119 and F135 are significantly underrated at 35,000 and 43,000 lb. thrust, respectively.
i always search like this video.... long time ago.... good video
Well the AL 41 used in mig 1.44 is different than al 41 used in su 35 and su57. There's a confusion because there are two engines designated as al41. AL 41 used in su35 and su57 is upgraded version of AL31 while the one used in mig1.44 was a variable cycle engine.
We are coming in this list...
You are comparing apples with oranges ,engines made for twin engined fighters with singles ,plus specific fuel consumption is missing which tells a lot regarding the tech level of the engine and these just scratch the surface !
indeed, the comparasion is ridiculous!
Super video very interesting...l love it thanks for posting.. great information
But rather incorrect. D-30f-6 for MiG-31 was not mentioned, though it is most powerful Russian jet for fighters
f100 should be on this list. latest variants that power the f15c would fall in about no.5.
MOST POWERFUL ENGINES TODAY. Not 40 years ago. Is actually a good list.
Japan's IHI has already tested XF-9-1 engine which has achieved 108 kN dry thrust & crossed 150 kN with afterburner.
Western ratings are like Hollywood movies - Americans always win everyone!))).... well, well))
So you deny the P&W F135 is the most powerful engine currently in a Fighter aircraft?
@@_Coffee4Closers I don't deny it, I mean else. I mean, the very criteria by which ratings are built are often based on what Americans are best at, rather than what Americans are worst at or mediocre at. Do you understand me?)
For example, the thrust of the Tu-160M2 engine is 55,000+ lbs
And this engine in Russia was developed under the USSR.
The Americans still can not create the same for their aircraft.
@@НиколайУльянкин-г6т even russia struggling to recreate some tech from ussr time. For ex engine for t80. Tu160 engine i not sure, seem they successfully rebuild, improve its recently.
@@strits1945 Yes, there are some technologies of the USSR that were irretrievably lost due to the collapse of the USSR.
@@НиколайУльянкин-г6т mig31, project 971 sub. Those thing even the west dont have any comparable. In fact now back bone of the us airforce is f15, b52. Ye, hollywood tech dominant.
Mr Pratt & Mr Whitney you are best EVER
if we are only talking about one engine, as the title says, the most powerful is the Kustnesov nk32 (55,000 ibf) which is put on the Tu 160M bomber.it is the largest and most powerful engine installed on a combat aircraft.
If you love specifications, this video delivers. I’m still a bit giddy!😵💫
India has yet to reach in this today thanks.
Don't worry they will.
India is like 1930' technology!!!!
India really needs to overcome this hardle. Indian defence index gonna changed very much only after a suitable reliable indigenous jet engine. Go India go!!!!😀😀😀😀
The IAF did chose to procure Tejas jets, but the service's auditor general criticized the design for failing to meet 53 criteria, including deficiencies in its radar- and missile-warning systems, limited internal fuel, underpowered engine relative airframe weight, and lack of electronic warfare support.05-Feb-2021
Pakistani Bot
first one currently should be the saturn izdeliye 30 which outputs a max of 171.7kN of thrust with a TWR of 10:1.
Good & Informative.
My favorite topic
Can you make video about airliners engines High bypass ,, about Life tbo
to put it mildly, outdated data. On the su 57 there is a Product 30, normal thrust 110 KN, afterburner 180 KN.
hmm.. what about the F402's? seem to be missing from the list?
How does the SR71‘s P&W J58 in comparison?
D-30F6?MiG
Some people do not understand what they read this is about fighter aircraft!
ua-cam.com/video/4G28wq5_hWc/v-deo.html
Aircrafts stealth comparison by RCS
French M53 engine is missing from the list...
This is porly researched, I saw a lot of comments saying a lot of other engines are missing.
Most of the people saying other engines are missing are talking about bomber or commercial jet engines. This is just for fighter engines.
I just looked up your M53. It only puts out 21,000 pounds of thrust with the afterburner on. It isn't close to the engines on this list.
@@Elthenar Are you stupid ? First it's 21,400 pounds of thrust, and second this places it SEVENTH on this list.
@@MessInMines I'll be honest, I skipped toward the end and didn't realize the first few places were that weak.
That said, I don't give a shit about an extra 400 pounds of thrust. That is not a powerful engine. It wouldn't even rate in the top 10 most powerful American engines. I am not sure why the low tiers are so underpowered in this vid.
The actual weight of the engines could have been useful
Got to love these verbal sales brochures
A gdzie silnik Sołowiow D-30-F6, napędzające Mig-31? One mają ciąg 152 kN z dopalaniem.
To jest Polska 🇵🇱
@@djocharablaikan8601 Polska nie produkuje ŻADNYCH silników odrzutowych.
Well done.
Pratt and Whitney engines are just staggering here. BTW F135 engine is conveniently not shown, that is some engine... look up that engine
I LOVE the BUZZ
интересно ... а где двигатель ТУ - 160 ?!
Volvo RM-12 (Suécia) com 80 KN - Gripen C/D
GE F-414 (EUA) com 98 KN - Gripen E/F
🔰Brasil💪💀🔰
Informative
China has plenty to catch up as far as jet engine development is concerned.
🖕🖕🖕from iran, 🤣🤣🤣
@@miladirani4313 is youtube blocked in Iran? You wouldn't want me to report you to your beloved ayatollah, would you? log off bro you are done.
@@Skankhunt-mv4vd I don't scare anyone bro , our life in Iran is big terrible and make me strong
Chinese WS-10A is better than Russian al31-fn and have already equipped with existing fighter jets. More powerful WS-15 which comparable with American f135 is rolling out very soon.
@@chenjoe6403 I don't believe any statistics provided by the Chinese communist government.
You missed out the Rolls Royce ATR655. It renders all on your list obsolete.
Saturn izideliye 30 that guy whos gonna outpower all engines today.
It would have been nice to have included the fuel consumption in the video
what about the MIG-31 ? what type of engine is it equipped with?
A shitty Russian Saturn.
@@_Coffee4Closers all righty! but if it is that shitty, how come it pushes the
MIG-31 to almost mach 3 ? Where's the deal ?
@@doncarlo5 Yeah and then you tear it down and reareo the whole HPT. Being able to go fast a few times does not a great engine make.
@@_Coffee4Closers an engine that has mach 3.2 capability, can it be that shitty?
It's the solodiev D30. It pushes the heaviest fighter jet in the world to mach 3, making it also the fastest fighter. It should be in second place on that list. Maybe they didn't include it because they consider the mig 31 an interceptor, but if they consider the F35, wich is almost a manned drone with shitty maneuverability, a fighter; then the mig 31 should be there.
What about f404, Chinese engines, and japanese one?
Pratt & Whittney J58? Currently holds the world record for speed if I’m not mistaken? How is this not on the list?
Is the black bird a fighter?
But what about such engines as the NK-25, NK-32??
And which fighter do those go in again?
@@Elthenar mig25/mig31
@@amirhoseynkhanbabaei1367 According to google, both of those engines go in bombers.
@@Elthenar oh . Yes yes tu22m3 engine bomber but mig31 D30 torbufan engine . I am iranian not russian ، I mixed up the names of the fighters and the bombers. Sorry
@@Elthenar That Russian person had to write the engine model correctly because I meant her as a MiG-31 fighter
Great efforts m'm🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🐾🐾
HELLO! SISTER PLEASE VIDEO ON SPACE MISSIONS LIKE =ISRO, NASA, ROSCOSMOS, ESA, JAXA AND OTHERS.🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
The "sister" is not the one making the videos: she is just the paid voice talent.
@@hasupe6520Bro! This All Videos Making By Man. And This Channel Belong To Which Country?
@@PramodMakkarkim kim momin nort-east India
@@deepaksonkar258 Ok! Wow ❤️🧡💛💚💙💜
Where is the Pratt & Whitney F-100 PW-229 with over 29000 Ibf of thrust used in the F-16C Block 52..??
There are three exelcent tubrofan engines in China,Trouble also report.
FWS10c(渦扇10C)
Max thrust :13.2kn
Thrust to weight ratio: 7.8
FWS15
Max thrust :18.1kn
Thrust to weight ratio: 10.78
FWS19
Max thrust :11kn
Thrust to weight ratio: 11
What type of Engine is F135 Is it a turbo jet or a turbo fan or both
India's Tejas Mk1A uses GE F404 and not GE F414 engine.
GE F414 Is planned for Tejas Mk2 coming in 2022
Bro she also said MK2
Can you makes something like this but with Turbopropeller engines
There are some soviet engines used in mig 31 etc which have higher thrust
@Norse man primary role is interceptor but it can shoot missiles so it can still be used for air dominance
D-30f-6 for MiG-31 was not mentioned, though it is most powerful Russian jet for fighters
*Tumansky R-15B-300 has left the chat*
0:18 "A nation like USA have developed advanced engines to compete against countries like Russia and China while these two nations have also started to build a clear technical lead in most aspects of combat aircraft development." Lol okay. Not a single Chinese engine on this list. and all their planes are just copies or iterations of Russia's cold war designs. Russian power units have the worst power to weight on the list. I'm not seeing the clear technical lead China and Russia have in combat aircraft development....This channel sure smells like propaganda to me. Xinnie the Pooh is that you?
Повсюду видишь пропаганду? Сейчас она с тобой в одной комнате? 😂 лечись от мефедроновой зависимости, человек неопределённого гендера 😂
Wow where is China 🇨🇳 J20 ,Japan 🇯🇵, India 🇮🇳 South Korea,Turkey 🇹🇷 and North Korea 😢love from South Africa 🌍 hope one day we will compete 😅also
Japanese xf9-1 engine
Force 147.10 kn
Xf9-1 только испытания проходит, как и изделие 30 , на планер еще не поставили, только в планах до 2028 года, на истребитель 5-го поколения, а так да он самый мощный на данное время из двигателей
@@zhalsan1965
Japanese sixth generation fighter
And I mean the power of the engines, not the planes
The Pratt & Whitney F135 and General Electric/Rolls-Royce F136 are both engines that competed to power the F-35:
Pratt & Whitney F135
Developed from the F119 engine used on the F-22 Raptor, the F135 produces 28,000 lbf of thrust and 43,000 lbf with afterburner. As of July 2024, Pratt & Whitney has delivered over 1,200 F135 production engines.
General Electric/Rolls-Royce F136
The F136 was the first F-35 engine to offer a single engine configuration for all three versions of the aircraft. Rolls-Royce is responsible for the front fan, combustor, stages 2 and 3 of the low-pressure turbine, and gearboxes. The F136 is a twin-spool, axial flow, augmented turbofan that is 221 in long and 48 in in diameter.
Saturn and Pratt-Whitney makes the coolest sounding engine ever
The F-414 equips the E version of SAAB Gripen too.
Why have you placed the GE F414 above the Eurojet EJ200 when it is clearly less powerful ?
*Soloviev D-30* ! 🙄
D30-F6 jet engines, each rated at 152 kN thrust, allow a maximum speed of Mach 1.23 at low altitude. High-altitude speed is temperature-redlined to Mach 2.83 - the thrust-to-drag ratio is sufficient for speeds in excess of Mach 3!.
Fighter interceptor but not air superiority fighter I Think is there assumption
@@omnadrener1 by intercepting anything in the air, it gets air superiority.
Supersuperka an air superiority fighter would be an aircraft supreme in both dog fighting and beyond visual range Mig-31 is no dog fighter it’s an interceptor with outstanding BVR capabilities
Mach 2.83 fully armed. That's combat speed. Mach 3 is allowed for only 5 minutes.