This Is Not What Space Looks Like
Вставка
- Опубліковано 14 кві 2017
- Amazing images of the far reaches of the universe are everywhere, but are they accurate? What does space really look like?
Yes, Apollo Flew Through the Van Allen Belts Going to the Moon - • Yes, Apollo Flew Throu...
Sign Up For The Seeker Newsletter Here - bit.ly/1UO1PxI
We got nominated for a People's Choice Webby! That means, you can help us win. Please, take a minute and vote for us here (thanks!):
vote.webbyawards.com/PublicVo...
Read More:
'Habitable' Exoplanets Might Not Be Very Earth-Like After All
www.seeker.com/habitable-exop...
"One of the most exciting moments in exoplanet science came in late February, when NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope announced the discovery of seven rocky planets orbiting in or near the habitable zone of their parent star, TRAPPIST-1, which lies 40 light years away from Earth.
'The discovery sets a new record for greatest number of habitable-zone planets found around a single star outside our solar system,' NASA said in a statement."
The Electromagnetic Spectrum
imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/science...
"The electromagnetic (EM) spectrum is the range of all types of EM radiation. Radiation is energy that travels and spreads out as it goes - the visible light that comes from a lamp in your house and the radio waves that come from a radio station are two types of electromagnetic radiation. The other types of EM radiation that make up the electromagnetic spectrum are microwaves, infrared light, ultraviolet light, X-rays and gamma-rays."
Truth Behind the Photos: What the Hubble Space Telescope Really Sees
www.space.com/8059-truth-photo...
"When Hubble beams down images, astronomers have to make many adjustments, such as adding color and patching multiple photos together, to that raw data before the space observatory's images are released to the public. Hubble doesn't use color film (or any film at all) to create its images. Instead, it operates much like a digital camera, using what's called a CCD (charge-coupled device) to record incoming photons of light."
____________________
Seeker inspires us to see the world through the lens of science and evokes a sense of curiosity, optimism and adventure.
Watch More Seeker on our website www.seeker.com/shows/
Subscribe now! ua-cam.com/users/subscription_c...
Seeker on Twitter / seeker
Trace Dominguez on Twitter / tracedominguez
Seeker on Facebook / seekermedia
Seeker on Google+ plus.google.com/u/0/+dnews
Seeker www.seeker.com/
Sign Up For The Seeker Newsletter Here: bit.ly/1UO1PxI
Special thanks to Amy Shira Teitel for hosting and writing this episode of Seeker!
Check Amy out on Twitter: / astvintagespace - Наука та технологія
In other words, many images of space are like Amy's hair. They're real... but with false-color highlights.
^_^
Master Therion ooooooo lol .
bully
Shots fired!
Ouch.
jan jansen No, I would never disrespect Amy. Comparing photos of space to Amy's hair is a compliment... to the photos ;)
This isn't what space looks like to US. But to an organism who sees in multiple wavelengths that we don't possess, they could totally get a view like that.
But the colours would probably look different, in fact they would have a whole other perception of colour or something.
It is already known that reptiles can see infrared, i.e., heat, to be able to hunt their prey. And I suspect birds can see ultraviolet, which allows them to see through fog and makes their prey stand out from the vegetation.
In fact, I was tested and found that one of my eyes extends into the infrared, and the other extends into the ultraviolet. If I wear a pair of lenses, one of which filters out the infrared, the other filters out the ultraviolet, I get somewhat of an idea what 'normal' human eyesight looks like... pretty dull to me in comparison to my visual range. Sometimes I feel like the majority of the human race is selectively colorblind. I wonder if some of our ancient ancestors, like Neanderthals, had extended vision that gave them enhanced ability to hunt their desired prey; and to be able to tell at a glance, which plants were safe to ingest; and perhaps to identify medicinal plants by simply looking at them.
you're probably right, there are many life form out there (aliens) that looks different at us that probably have more senses than us, so you're probanly right.
Are you saying that nebula images for example will be black and white to our naked eye? Or will we see them in color?
ANBUxReaper No we see nebula in colour of course. Mind you, what we call colours are just the wavelengths of light that our eyes can perceive. We only see a pretty narrow band of light wavelengths. There's no telling what other species out there in the universe might have evolved to see.
*The pillars of creation*
Me: :-)
*which are gone now btw*
Me: :-(
Newly gathered data from a few months back says otherwise.
doesnt mean you cant see them anymore. theyre thousands of lightyears away and the light from their past still reacahes us even if they were destroyed in the year 0. but i dont think any household telescope will give you similar images to hubble.
They are still there.
I saw them today.
@@MrGustass1 I hope you're correct.
They are Still there
When you think about how far away the stars are from us and eachother, just the fact that our eyes can see them as small dots altought they are unimaginable huge is impressing.
altought??? WHO 'tought' jou how to spell? impressive....
@@mr.blackhawk142 cringe
@@mr.blackhawk142 you*
@@mr.blackhawk142funny how you had a typo just like they did 💀💀💀💀💀
The most kind blowing part is how much more unimaginable the space in between each ‘dot’ is. Quite literally incomprehensible for our human brains.
*So it's dark with sparkling stars* ✅🙂
No its ready with sparkling lights
No sparkling, the twinkling of stars is caused by our atmosphere. Once you leave it, no more sparkling.
NickiDrea awww🥺
How is it dark in space if there is a sun?
@@Plumpkin_Plays Good Question, Take one steel glass and from top of glass switch on torch light, then imagine we(people) are inside the steel glass [NOTE:-Assume Room as a Space and steel glass where we(people) are living as earth and steel glass is inside a room] what do you see from bottom of the glass the whole steel glass become bright from bottom to top of the glass .Just for a moment imagine we (people) come out of glass from top and see , what we see from top of steel glass we will see inside of a glass is fully bright but outside of the glass it'll be dark(Room will be dark).Similarly assume bottom of the glass as earth surface where we live and assume top of the glass as a earth atmosphere ( Due to earth atmosphere it scatters sunlight due to which we see beautiful blue sky but outside earth sunlight doesnot seem blue)and assume outside of the glass(Room) as a space which will be dark , only light seen will be from sun similar to the torch light.NOTE:-Here We have to imagine one steel glass inside a huge room .one small torch light will be able to make a whole steel glass completely bright but it cannot make whole room bright only a certain portion of the room will be bright.Here Space is a huge Room
So, you're telling me that scientists add filters to their photos?
Scientists be keeping all the cool Instagram filters to themselves to create unrealistic standards of beauty, smh
Joel Harris yep! and also might even be completely different colors we humans can’t see or process.
As to quote nasa's data visualizer and designer Robert Simons "It's Photoshopped but it has to be"
Tim
In other words ... "but but it has to be" faked.
What we didn't hear.
"Because we need our $52,000,000 tax dollars a DAY."
HAHA How else do we expect them to pay their Freemasons?
Freemasons are expensive!!
Football players aka actors get a base pay of a $1,000,000 a year to act out on the field. Freemason actor(astro)NOTS must at least get 100 times that to act in a swimming pool.
agreed
It's interesting to know that data can be turned into what you want it to be.
Far too many artists' simulations and enhanced images STILL everywhere. I am happy to look at the beauty of space in its simplest form. Still searching for it but it's incredibly rare.
I bet you a grand that what you think is "space in its simplest form" is an enhanced/simulated image still. You really didn't understand anything she said about light frequencies, did you?
Rare lol it’s freaking non existent which tells me they are lying
@@7fitterman Your comment tells me that you do not understand how a digital sensor generates a visible image. I highly recommend learning about it if you're genuinely curious about this topic.
Absolutely extremely frustrating. Images outside of the visible spectrum are fine for data. But don't present them as what space "Looks like". Looks like to whom? Not a human being with eyes. What gets me the most is the visual light spectrum photographs ALSO being "Enhanced" with false color. Hey, I'm no flat earther, I believe in science. But I want truth. I want transparency. I want to see space for what it actually looks like with a telescope in the human visible light spectrum.
@ChrisKelleyLive
Science does not require a belief because it's real.
I agree, images should not be altered out of the scientific community.
Regular folk just want to see 👀 things the way they truly appear. 😶
It's interesting how we don't know 95% of our oceans and haven't been able to drill past 12 km in the crust....but we sure do have a lot of information about outer space!
Because its a fantasy delusion. Humanity has been massively deceived
@@Level_No_Curve indeed we’ve been lied too we actually live in a giant space egg named craig
Space has always been regarded as more important than our home planet. Survival has to go beyond 1 planet, that’s why most people could care less.
Everything is discovered by mathematical analysis, chemistry, and sciencr
@@Level_No_Curve i guess you think the earth is flat too
Anyone else have no idea what this channel is or never remember subbing
J31: Seeker was originally a sister UA-cam channel to DNews; the former absorbed the latter and they are now one.
Zach Valzach ohh right cheers
Previously this channel was called Vsause, if you remember.
Carl CIFER no vsauce still exists
J31 Did you check 'Veritasium'?
I liked this narrator has a calmer voice and she really takes an interest in the subject
You beat me to it
@@nuclearpugg lol u read my mind
So true!
She's articulate and energetic...
Simp
*My future is darker than space*
You must be one Edge lord for even during the super massive black hole era of the universe in hundreds of billions of years there will be no light or even wave lengths of light
Only very high or low wavelengths from black holes colliding
@@kamronmartinez487 billions of year your wrong the Earth is only about 10.000 years old
Okay Chris.
That's deep
@@kamronmartinez487 yes your future is dark bitch
Boi just because we don’t see it doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist
Religion in a nutshell.
Boi just because we see it doesn't mean it does exist.
@@AmorConfidencial
No. God in a nutshell. Religion controls People not God.
Didnt your mother ever tell you not to use double negatives?
Mishimized ?
So our conception of space is largely an artistic rendering informed by science? Sounds romantic. I like it.
Phileos Sophia The pictures that are taken from telescopes are real. They are just enhanced and given extra color.
Moron
Dendrox den The person didn't say otherwise. If you take a real photo and color it in based on what you know of the era, and everyone gets their image of that era from that added coloring, that doesn't change that the photo is real.
Yup...you would think russia or japan or china would give a dollar to get to ra moon....but they know better than to fake another mission on bullsh utz
Important to point out that color is added like this not to make a beautiful image, but to show the difference in gasses and such, they show more information.
In reality a lot of nebulas a such would be very red, or blue as those are dominant colors of gasses. They'd still be too dark to see with a naked eye but they exist.
The Pillars are gone? Noooo
Linfamy they have been gone for thousands of years my friend. Most starts are too, this is because of how light travels
A lot of the things you see in the sky are gone lmao, we took an image of a galaxy like 30 billion light years away that has been gone for a looooong time
@@kerstinnilsson9968 how did they do it?
@@bladeoftheruinedking2543 light travel
wut isn't this terraria?
meanwhile in NASA...
-hey , how do we make this new data from our telescope look very cool?It's a real mess.
-Let's just call my boy Mark...he's a painter...
NASA acronym for Never A Straight Answer
How does it work?
flat earthers are morons
Michael. NASA always gives straight answers, the problem is that you are too scientifically ignorant to understand what they mean.
Shannon de Beer NASA gives bs excuses that you dumb dumbs believe.
Amazing argument, Ommar. You must be very proud.
That's where Goku is fighting for the dragon balls
IT NOT REAL
Ultra instinct
Rex Art Jiren better calm his shit
The world of void
i love goku
Wouldn't it be the same if you took a picture of a human using the waves around him, measuring gas coming out of certain places😉 and heat and cold similar to an aura photoo? In another words I'd like to see the science applied to something that we actually see on earth, then see how close artist renderings are to the real thing.
it was easy to know these images doesn't exactly present to us the raw thing, but is there a way we can see the pictures took by the satellites, like Cassini and others? i'd love to see it, even tho in black and white, grainy, seeing the real deal kinda send shivers down the spine
They're not fake, just enhanced.
Exactly.
Processed ≠ Fake
+Zees Chan Then technically every photo you take straight from your smartphone or regular camera is fake.
Every capture device applies a gamma curve, white balance, saturation, noise reduction, for then also getting lossy compressed as it saves to jpeg.
You have no way around, either you admit every photo you have ever taken is "50% fake" or just say they are real photos that were processed.
Zees Chan It's not strictly an assumption, I have studied how it works. A camera captures the image trough the sensor, which then is either: processed there and sends the data to the processor (to reduce bandwidth),
or the raw data is directly sent to the main processor which catches this data and applies the needed processing for storage and viewing on regular devices.
About all comercial devices can capture and save to jpeg, and some of them (DSLR/mirrorless and some current-gen flagship phones) can output to their RAW format, which is, loosely speaking, unprocessed data, but with the catch that is still *has* to get processed in order to get properly viewed with regular playback devices.
Don't make the baseless assumption that I was making an assumption. And please check what a theory actually means.
You would make a great lawyer.
I don't know, but I'm pretty sure they are real. Oh you meant what she was talking about ?
DAMNIT WHY IS MY MICRO-WAVE IN SPACE AGAIN
DUDE STOP LAUNCHING THEM INTO SPACE
*angry microwave sounds*
So musch assumption in science
Theyre fake scientist with no achievement in life
Yeah a lot of assumptions. Ever wondered how you can tap on a surface and communicate with people across the world? Accurate assumptions.
@@Postermaestro I know right. Just like how we're doing it here
@@airosmithredila4725 sheesh
TRUE.
This video was sponsored by the electromagnetic spectrum.
What's the deal with this comment section? I'm sitting here laughing at these.
Turnipage yea, if you didn’t already know the average person knows more than the scientists that study the universe their entire lives.
Frank Teng I was referring to the people talking about how "she's hot" and everything
Frank Teng Well when you get to make up the science as you go and it’s all science fiction your not learning or teaching you’re telling stories. Also when it goes against every thing people sense and feel and they trust their instincts and then research themselves then they are more intelligent than the “scientists”
one two sadly that’s not the case as most people are even bias in the most extreme ways, and now with the fairly basic information known you’re then delve into things that not any average person can understand. Not everyone puts in the time nor has the capability to put it together. If you Truly believe what you commented then you greatly over estimate the mental capabilities of your average joe.
Turnipage I didn’t think that because these comments are quite common in any video with hot women. I just considered it negligible because it was pointless information no where near the main topic of the video.
I have a telescope myself and I remember viewing the orion nebula,it was white and dull but at the same time I really enjoyed seeing it
I have one too
Notification Sqaud how much did it cost you?
go to any astronomer friendly website which contains some classified ads and you can see your monetary limit. if you dare, try your local craigslist, but be cautious there
With an amateur telescope?
Alex Alford Your profile tho 😂😂
Everybody's concern what it looks like, but no one cares
how it FEELS like.
🤔👁️
i heard what it smells like
Lol
Just ask the idiot astro nots, like Don Pettit!
@@causeeffect7624 burnt steak . Space smells like burnt steak
The title should have been 50 shades of space.
Abhiroop Bhattasali ..Bwahahahahaahaha😂😂😂Nice,lmao
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂best com.mmment ever😂😂😂
This video is kind of misleading though. Nebulae like the Orion Nebula does look truly amazing to the naked eye.
Just pull out a telescope or a really good camera and point it at the Orion Nebula and you'll see a beautiful purple cloud.
probably because of earth's atmosphere.
+aazo5 I have a 6 1/2 foot scope with a 16" mirror, the Orion Nebula (M42) looks awesome with slight color variations on a cold winter night.
You're absolutely correct. I looked though a friends telescope, we took a picture and the Orion Nebula looks spectacular. A bit fuzzy though the simple equipment we used , but still mind blowing.
Innit like
Victor Oliveira
Um no ...
It's good to see Amy again and to hear her calming voice:)
She has her own channel Vintage Space, but I like to see her and Trace on this channel and hope the new company don't screw it up too much like the debacle that is Seeker Daily
I'm new to the channel. I noticed she has an accent and I wonder what her original voice was? Unless this isn't a USA channel, my apologies.
She's Canadian.
Does anyone else feel that she looks a lot like Dakota Johnson ??
Dustin Wagner
She reminds me of Anastasia Steel 😍
You're going to do a video with the title like you did, show us more examples of what these images actually look like with natural light without being enhanced. Like what you see when you look through a telescope. Please do a video like this
Jesse James most people will see things in monochrome through a telescope. If you want you can search up true color Astro photography.
@@jujubean7664 ASStro photography? How 'special'!
This.
I think it was explained pretty well basically space doesn’t look anything like the pictures we see.. they actually add color and stuff to see what it would look like
@@Eccentric1999 very interesting that we are clearly onto them and they are doing damage control now 😂🙌 10 for effort
NASA without CGI is impossible
Lmao.. Cgi Is not that a thing On 1970's Lel... How did they Tried To take a photo on nebulas And solar system planets lel..
Lyrics from Red Hot chili peppers, Californication
"Space may be the final frontier but its made in a Hollywood Basement"
American Dissident the meaning of that went right over your head didn't it?
American Dissident i love that line
Pato Truth hurts doesn't it? especially when it is so in your face.
Lyrics from Evanescence
" Crawling in my crawl
These wounds they will not crawl
Crawling is how i crawl
Crawling what is crawl"
Huda emcmora but Apollo was staged. There’s over 100 facts wrong with the pictures and videos.
Where is the real photo of space? That’s why I clicked.
Just close your eyes and walla
Tynchy Temper 😂😂😂
@@tynchytemper9618 insertAlias: But that doesnt really hel---
Tynchy Temper: *_WALLA!!!_*
1:30 the right one?
B&W
How can Hubble see other galaxy's but can only see Pluto as a dot
You can easily see other galaxies with a pair of binoculars on a clear night if you know where to look. Just like small clouds that don't move compared to the Stars around them. Andromeda (the one on a collision course with the Milky Way) is visible with your eyes on a good night. I was in the city when I saw the first ones.
@@alanroberts7916 I know what andromeda is sorry if I got it wrong
@@dmvbrayden but your question is a good one about Pluto, and I would guess that it's because Pluto is very, very small.
Now you using common sense. And its funny how that natural sense outweighs their so called knowlege(lie or theory) I don’t care how that’s backed up the question remains unanswered because its a lie.
@@alanroberts7916 ok have a good day or night
So weird they can see stars cuz the dudes that “landed” on the moon said they saw no stars and pictures of the earth and moon show no starts either. And she knows how they went through the van allen belt but the astronauts don’t they said they didn’t even know it was there lmao I love those comedy channels they crack me up.
wtf is this mess of a comment, go back to school and learn how to use grammar before you comment something like this garbage again.
@@themoon-sj5rr you're a Freemason tool. Reason why? Because you believe those Freemason lies and Freemason Astronauts.
I'm having a stroke
lol They also say we can't get to the moon now because the technology was destroyed haha I think it's more likely we never went to the moon, Stanly Kubrick filmed it and left us hints in the Shining and other movies. I know I'm the stupid one because I don't believe what Nasa and the Gov says lol
Karen Burgenstein nice to see you Karen awake to the bs
R.I.P pillars of creation aka eagle nebula :(
AstroGamer ,
Wait what
only 90s kids will remember it
It took me by surprise, which it really shouldn't have. I know all this stuff. I just never thought of it.
Probably went to the store get some milk be back in a min.
Your lying I'm looking at a microwave right now.
Shat Million stop.
Shat Million XD 👾❣️
Explaiin da jok plssssss!!!
Explaiin da jok plssssss!!!
Shat Million lol
This is not what space looks like-
"But is this what space really looks like? Well... kind of."
maybe... probably not, who really knows? no one or very few.
@@causeeffect7624 ?
@@Postermaestro if you haven actually been in outer space and looked back to see it, then you really don't know what it looks like. they tell us anything. we cant believe it all.
@@causeeffect7624 You can buy a telescope and see other planets and stars for yourself. The images are manufactured from data and colorcoded to separate objects with different wavelengths. They obviously would not look like this to the human eye.
@@Postermaestro You are on the right track but you still arent 100% right. Many of the images that bubble takes are actually in true color, most of which are galaxies. Most of these nebulae are shades of dark red and teal blue. There is very little naturally occurring green in space aside from comets and meteors.
“Space doesn’t look like this computer graphic but it looks like this computer graphic”
Devin LINKME
WHO WROTE THIS SCRIPT???
Please don’t say NASA.
Ohana Digital Filmworks 🤣🤣 I wouldn’t doubt for a second they did
Most pictures of space are made by artists.
SoulTalk yeaj
No, they are done by Dilbert using Paint
SoulTalk Yeah, because space doesnt exist and the earth is flat. Our pictures of Earth are also made by artists that use cgi
Control Nexus u need to go and search for what is space documentary hosted by brian
+Control Nexus that's a damn true fact right there
0:05 that's the skyrim level up screen lmao
That kinda depends on what skill tree you're looking at, doesn't it?
@@davidmurphy1207 Ilussion 100
O
nomah son
Warrior tree
It's all artists impression then. Great, next time I'll just buy a comic book.
Did you even watch the video
You’re an idiot dude😂
Do you think they just color it like a book? How do you not know anything about the amazing ways we can READ colors through waves.
J Crossan they’re assuming the colors from the waves it’s not 100 percent accurate they’re guessing
Shocka Savvy
Don’t use the word guessing or assuming in here, you should know that already if you know anything about this topic unless you just researched it online.
I won’t go into detail since it was a 30-40 minute talk but I talked to my professor already, the readings are very accurate especially simple colors our retinas can see, that’s all you need to know unless you’re really curious.
J Crossan the colors are assumptions we can’t even see most of the wavelengths in space meaning their are colors we can’t even see in space . Our eyes trick us all the time just how the sun is really white but appears to humans to be yellow .
I honestly think they’re more beautiful in normal vision
Grey
Finally, someone talking. I hated those videos with just text and music in the background.
eenayeah ii
eenayeah don't know what I did here!.No offence Amy.
"Its like changing the key of a song. It sounds different, but still the same."
You what?
yeah? it's true. nightcore is an example of that. higher key/pitch but still the same song
Fear Of
Same song .. just in a different tuning ..
Hi C and low C sound very different. But they're still C.
Are you sped?
@@flyingstapler1241 When you change even one tiny bit of a tune, its not the same tune anymore. Thats not even arguable.
**Look at this beautiful picture of the pillars of creation!**
Me: 😮
**Which are gone btw**
Also me: 😦
I felt that
they aren't gone, it was a mistake in 2017, according to scientists there are to remain that way for the hundreds of thousands of years
@@robcoIncorp actually it is very much possible that the pillars are gone since we are viewing them 7,000 years in the past by now a star must have taken them out or they are all out of "star dust" this is what makes up nebula and they make stars. To put it in perspective man kind was in the Neanderthal era we were just being to form a "civilization". So yeah there still visible but they might not actually be there in real time that's what she meant by there gone now and we cant just see how long there are going to be there for because we can only see the light that is hitting us now that has taken 7,000 years to travel so its impossible to see/know what is going to them in the future.
@@outbackastro4083 Hubble has been able to do velocity and size calculations, even over 7000 years (which is a stupid way to look at things because of special relativity), the pillars would still remain.
@@jimmythechicken4802 yes but if you think about it they are in the middle of a star nursery which means that they may have been whipped out because a forming star releases gama ray "lasers" at each polar end of the star which may have hit the pillars and destroyed them
@@outbackastro4083 well of course the pillars will look a little different in 7000 years, but in no way will they be "destroyed"
No idea how a wavelength even works... But when they showed the visible light chart I was like "Yeah that makes sense 🤔"
2:39 the moment when my heart broke.
Blanco Rebaño ?
They aren't.
@@mrsucc2138 actually it is very much possible that the pillars are gone since we are viewing them 7,000 years in the past by now a star must have taken them out or they are all out of "star dust" this is what makes up nebula and they make stars. To put it in perspective man kind was in the Neanderthal era we were just being to form a "civilization". So that's what she meant by there gone now.
@Luna tic the pillars of creation
@@outbackastro4083 Very true. I've often thought that if were possible to design an infinitely powerful telescope to view these distant worlds down to ground level, we would see civilisations walking about that have been dead for centuries. This would make interstellar travel and communication troublesome to say the least.
I wish we could travel space in my lifetime. It would be amazing and answer the question " Is there life beyond Earth"
YES. but too bad that that thing you mention is still quite impossible in our lifetime :(
SickSkids Because you've been to space and can know
SickSkids
I won't miss it, this rock has seen enough horrors in its' lifetime.
On that note, I'm sure there's life evolving somewhere in the vast universe, if not the entire galaxy... space is big and easy to get lost in.
Is there life beyond earth.. what if alien's are asking the same buddy.
What if we are one of the best resource managers in the universe? Maybe the inhabitants of other worlds turned their planets into a lifeless wasteland more efficiently than us? We could be among the worst, or the best; we'll never know, will we?
Kid: so what does space look like dad
Dad: a big ass gap
Damn i feel bad that so many people are missing out, thinking that space is fake. You can litterally buy an astrophotography setup and take your own pictures.
I've been lied to
You weren't lied to. You just chose to believe it that way.
Mints didn't chose it I was just never told
Now you know, be smarter and more aware everyday.
Justin C Nah, you just never bothered to look at the text below an image. "false color rendering" "artist rendition"
You're not incapable of reading the fine print, you were just lied to! Makes perfect sense!
Wait the pillars of creation are gone now? :(
Yes, the Pillars of Creation was destroyed by a supernova that was several light years away from it. Blowing the dust and gases away from the star-forming region.
Maybe. From the wiki
This interpretation of the hot dust has been disputed by an astronomer uninvolved in the Spitzer observations, who argues that a supernova should have resulted in stronger radio and x-ray radiation than has been observed, and that winds from massive stars could instead have heated the dust. If this is the case, the Pillars of Creation will undergo a more gradual erosion.
William C. Sierra and how in the world do they know that??
6-7k (delayed light) years is like 10 seconds in galactic time. I think someone has their math wrong on this one.
+Bike Jake You are mistaken. a light year is a year in "galactic time". Light travels at a set speed (the speed of light) and needs one year to overcome a light year.
Therefore, it travels 10 light seconds in 10 seconds, not 6000-7000 light years as you claim.
Also, I'm not sure what you mean by "delayed" light years.
apparently the pillars still exist!! it was a mistake that NASA thought they were destroyed by a supernova
I'm pretty sure I can see microwaves, I use them to heat up my pop tarts everyday. (😂)
Microwave ovens were BANNED in Russia in the 70s, but go ahead IRRADIATE your food and your home.
I always wondered, how they capture these colourful pictures and weather it is real or not. thanks for explaining.
Thumbnail is a supernova not space... space is black af with white dots
And everyone know there is no way a supernova can be in space. That's dumb. /s
lol
How about you get Some reliable information sources instead of your naked eyes getting light from stars far far far away
you do know that some of those "white dots" are stars many hundreds of times larger than our sun?
exactly.
This is a way better channel than I ever thought.
I see gamma-rays
This puts a smile on banners face
flags face?
Should have mentioned brightness! All these objects are so dark that the human eye can't see them in color even if they have it! Takes a light-gathering instrument to make it visible.
2:31 This is not what French sounds like haha
Explain further 😊
I consider myself well learned on science stuff, but why have I never seen this electromagnetic spectrum graph before? It's so important in understanding things. I had no idea radio waves and gamma rays were at opposite ends of the same spectrum. Further study of this fundamental knowledge is now top priority, thanks for showing me this
So it’s just Dark to the Human eye ? Well then it’s dark in real life
I just want to be told honestly what something is. I don’t need all the fake stuff.i mean yeah it’s cool to imagine what it may be like and those are gorgeous pics, but that info needs to be upfront and apparent so that people do not believe something that comes out someone’s imagination.
Title: This Is Not What Space Looks Like
Video: Is this what space looks like? kind of.
Title: This Is Not What Space Looks Like
First line: Look at all these amazing space images. Is this what space really looks like? Well, kind of.
-Is there a "Block this channel for eternity? option on UA-cam?
there is
Yeah, go to thier channel. Click or tap the 3 dots on the top left or right corner and click "block".
I just Reported It for THAT Exact Reason !!! .... It's Contractory. They are Making Money under False Pretenses. And That Is FRAUD !!!
Neville Madden So you're a UA-cam Hero? Fucking coward
Why did this stupid comment get so many likes...?
So this what this was really about: the ad 🥺
I feel cozy here on earth :)
Ha ha ha you think you can life forever inthe earth
pro-cessing
y'know, the way the word is meant to be said.
My god, these liberals love pro-cessing and pro-cesseeez. STFU. think it makes them smart
C A what do liberals even have to do with this video. how are you this thirsty for a political argument
MAGA MCDONALDS AND GOLF AGAIN
C A
“Proceseeeez” is just plural. You just pick it up after so many hours of science and medicine lectures. It is often emphasized to distinguish plural from the verb form of the word when you have a professor who’s shoving a chapter’s worth (or more) information down your throat.
Pro-cess, on the other hand... no. Thats is just pretentious nonsense. No one in undergrad or grad level pronounces it that way. She just incorporated that shit all on her own, probably for effect.
1:18 the visible light version of the pillars of creation is also not accurate. It is processed with what's called the "Hubble Palette". Instead of RGB filters the nebula is captured with Hydrogen Alpha, Sulfur II, and Oxygen III filters. The three images are then combined in SHO, which is SII assigned to red, HA assigned to green, and OIII assigned to blue. A true visible light version of the pillars 0f creation, or Messier 16, would be almost entirely red.
Hubble can’t even see the junk they left on the moon but it sure makes up great cgi of other universes lol
Perspective my guy. The moon is small but close, while galaxies/stars are large but far! I don't believe the moon hoax by the way.
Stars are small and close. Don’t be brainwashed bro. They lying. NASA means “to deceive”
@@dylanr90 Thanks for looking after brother, I was just pointing out a flawed argument. I don't know for sure what the shape of the earth is, but it definitely seems flat to me, that's what all the evidence points out to. As for brain watching, in terms of conspiracy views, I doubt there are many that hold my views (due to how extreme they are).
@@hotsauce153 all of u guys are brain dead
@@rohan1833 🖕
Okeh I like the admin's voice look like we were study about universe in a spaceship HAHA
I love how they named that specific image the pillars of creation, it’s such a cool name and image.
stiff cocks would do.
i miss the dnews intro
We all do.
Ramped Upp yes
jose michael ludovico same
The infrared light image looks much more beautiful😍..they should't change it into visible light image
You can't just say that the pillars of creation are gone now so casually!
Does she mean the Pillars Of Creation are gone, like technically gone because what we see is thousands of years old? Because, yes, one would expect that. Or does she mean that if a telescope were aimed at it, that it's no longer visible because what we see has changed so much over the years since that famous photo was taken? You understand what I'm asking, right?
dggydddy59 what even is reality?
PlayerFive77 Yeah, right?! Because I don't think I've seen anyone answer this particular question. They all answer in terms of light years and all. But like I said, we understand that part. But what I want to know is, if you look through the telescope, is it gone? Is that what she's saying? Or is she talking about, because we're dealing with light years, it's not physically there anymore, even though it's still there in the telescope. I think I'm having a hard time articulating this! LOL!
Its still there for us, after-all what we see is 6500 years ago. Once the stars fusion begins the star blows the gas/dust away. But if you somehow went there, there would be no pillars, just a lot of baby stars!.
dggydddy59 yh i dont get it cause that means every direction into space from earth is the past!?
Exactly!
Thank you for putting this information out there. So many people don't understand the differences.
Starts watching random video about space. Hears Amy's voice narrating. Click thumbs-up icon. Continues watching the rest of the video.
Why not just show people the actual pictures produced in every spectrum and then a computer-generated picture displaying the changes because every hubble picture I've seen has color?
yes they all have color, but some of them are inhanced or added new colors to the galaxies
My brain is finna blow
Matthew Reid LOL, haha davis!
Job
carol sloss going to
You must not have one lol finna isn't a word dumbass😂😂😂
Loudkush 420 it’s slang for fucks sake.
Wow the people who keep flirting at Amy in the comments need a life.
May God be with you all. You need a life too! You're wasting your live when you believe in God!
May God be with you all. You need to get a life
Daryl Dixon God doesn't exist
Jesus hates u
JDM A'F You're talking Bullshit!
Astronomer: that star is 2 billion miles away and was formed 2 million years ago.
Gets paid and lives a happy life.
Space doesn't look like anything , it's what occupies space that you are observing.
Doesn't it bother you that you need to tell these people that space is invisible??? he he he... The dumbing down of America is in full swing!!!...
Rip Mars rover "my battery is low and it is getting dark out"
:(
@@davidhatcher7016 ):
*gets covered in dust
" *_nasa,i don't feel so good_* "
@Deluxezzz Pixxa those are happy faces, get out
):(
Best video done by you ever & seriously very informative. Thanks!
if by informative you mean lying to your face, then yes. Though its only about the deep sky images, the artists renditions part is correct.
Quick question-
If Hubble can look in visible spectrum of light then why it doesn't take pictures in visible light ? I mean after all we convert the images taken in infrared light to visible light right?
When we shift the colour information to frequency that we can see , don't we change the colour of the image to?
But you said the colour of image remains constant how?
I still remember how disappointed I was when I found this out.
Tru dat! 😁 Sometimes these facts are shattering our dreams aren't they?!
How???
@@KingLordLele 😂😂😂 ask NASA, they will keep deceiving you
@@SteffiMarshall most of the stuff that they say in the video is fake
@@KingLordLele the really should start telling the truth about space. Hollywood sci fi films have distorted the truth about space
Use Hubble telescope to take selfies :D
Kasia Gaming lmao
I'll give you a pic of my black hole ;)
Cool I want an infrared image of my face :D
Precious Gaming And in 2024... the Chile's Giant Magellan Telescope will be finished... and that's 10 times more powerful than Hubble.
It'll be really zoomed into your skin pores through your heart and through your body
Narrator is great. She should replace scarlet Johansson as black widow
Well, someone will explain that this is a fake or, the galaxy really looks so colorful, too beautiful?
Most of the nebulae are false-color, although they are still beautiful in their normal, true colors as well. Galaxies, however, are actually that colorful. Most observatories such as Hubble take their galaxy images in true color.
One of the most intriguing images in the sky is the "Horsehead Nebula" in Orion. I even recorded a faint image of it with my 8 inch telescope back in the 1980s. This required a 30 minute guided exposure at the time. This object is thought to be 1,600 light years away. However, even if you were as close as one light year away, you would not "see" the object with the naked eye.
That is reality.
Her bangs bother me.
good thing they're not yours
Bitter Bunny
she brothers me.
anyone that lies that well.
What bangs...?? It's data taken and then scientist add color... It's not really what you see.. just what they think they want you to see...
Bud Greenfield the hosts bangs......duh those are the only bangs in the video
kaemjalo dude it went over your head... Maybe you should look sarcasm up in the dictionary... because that's what it was... Geeze... How does that foot in your mouth taste?? I was just joking... Do you understand that or should I explain it to you in stupid?? Wait I don't have crayons .. and I really don't speak stupid... DUH!!
Let me save everyone some time: The pillars of creation image that everyone knows and loves is a visible-light image, so we’re seeing it the way it would look to the naked eye. Then they show us a painting of what the surface of some alien planet might look like. Literally nobody thinks these images are “photographs.” Then there’s an ad for some lame subscription box. 😐
This is what we get for listening to a pink haired girl trying to be a downer
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
An interesting and worthwhile video.
Not first
BioKing TFT but I am second though
Lil Ladiboi From Bangkok I excrete human feces
Jonas Karlsson sadly not anymore
Aunt Jemima Take your pants off first Auntie.
Outras galaxias infelizmente não, mas podemos sondar a mais distante estrela em nossa galaxia. Já temos tecnologia basta querer.
To me, the most impressive artists' rendering of space is probably the black hole of Interstellar, which if I'm not mistaken is the most accurate depiction of what scientists believe they would actually look like.
2:39 F for the pillars of creation.
But the real question is.... How long does the artist rendered your bangs?
What's farther, Chicago or by train?