Mark Kermode reviews The Passion of Joan of Arc | BFI Player
Вставка
- Опубліковано 19 жов 2024
- Championing Carl Theodor Dreyer's enduring masterpiece of silent cinema. Watch The Passion of Joan of Arc on BFI Player (UK only): theb.fi/2khe74I
The greatest global cinema on demand. Discover films on desktop, laptop, tablet or mobile and selected Samsung TVs.
Subscribe: bit.ly/subscrib....
Watch more on the BFI Player: player.bfi.org.uk/
Follow us on Twitter: / bfi
Like us on Facebook: / britishfilminstitute
Follow us on Google+: plus.google.co... #BFIPlayer
This is the most important and best silent film I have ever seen. It is among the best films of all time. There is SO much realism and emotion in Renee's performance. It is eerie how modern this film looks. It looks better than most of the films made in 2024! Renee lives on forever through this beautiful piece of cinematic history! I hope wherever she is, she knows how much her work is appreciated almost 100 years later!
"You have burned a SAINT!!" (Town goes crazy)
Just watched it yesterday, from the wondrous slipcased Eureka edition. Can see visual echoes of it later in Ken Russell's The Devils. Absolute cinematic goldmine.
Thank you BFI and Mark Kermode, your weekly player plus has had a profound effect on me, it has even reached the point where these brevis introductions have produced nostalgia for myself.
Seeing this on the big screen at the AFI Silver in Silver Springs, Maryland, was a revelatory experience. I am not sure I even 'liked' the film, however it will always stay with me, especially that face.
One of the best films ever made.
If it doesn't have the Voices of Light soundtrack you're simply missing out.... piano just doesn't cut it.
i can't find this movie with music anywhere. is this movie supposed to have music or not? i don't understand.
I think it was the first soundtrack composed for it after it was rediscovered. It's utterly glorious - full orchestra and choir, emotive, based on medieval themes. The Criterion Collection version is the one you want to watch.
No, the "director's cut" of the film was rediscovered in 1981. The Voices of Light was recorded much later in 1994. The director apparently wanted the film to be viewed without accompanying music, although over the years many people/groups have created musical and vocal accompaniments inspired by the film. Home releases offer various musical scores. The "Voices of Light" is a favorite which supercharges the emotion of performances, however watching the film in a proper 20fps rendering without music transforms the film, giving it a more documentary style. What I found interesting is that but due to the use of close up shots it still remains a very perspective driven film so you don't necessarily need the music to tell you what to feel, you can just simply "sit beside Joan" and know what she had to go through.
I watched it with no music at all. Music detracts from it.
Voices of Light slays all.
This is a fantastic film!!
One of the best films of the roaring 20s
IMO, Passion of Joan is a superhero movie and it's the greatest one of all time.
Suppressed suffering
Kermode's deliberate emphasis upon the 'kneeling on concrete' rumour unfortunately overshadows the rest of his appetiser. He always loves the gossip behind a film doesn't he? I can accept his salivation over juicy rumours with other films but with this one it borders on ignorance.
Dreyer and Falconetti would be so angry. Especially because it's untrue anyway.
Is it acting if you have to physically injure yourself to express pain associated with that injury? What is the audience reacting to in this case? The emotion on screen or the story behind that act that she had to 'kneel for hours on a cold concrete floor'? May be Dreyer wanted Falconetti to undergo physical and mental trauma as a price to get this coveted role but then how ethical is it? These questions are important as in recent years many actresses have come forth with allegations against many so called important male directors who made them suffer for the sake of authenticity.
I would challenge that. All pain is the essence of any art. If there is enough inside to make a performance like this and you need just a little trigger to push it to the limit - then why not? And placing it in a trivia of male vs. female dynamic - so boring! I would imagine he didn't chain her and made her play in this movie.
@@Eleanor-Freya Acting for cinema is different than theatre.
This appears to be one of those movies you like because pretentious film critics tell you to.
I like it because it's genuinely one of the greatest performances ever put to film; easily the single greatest display of acting skill of the 1920s that we have record of. While Metropolis may always hold my top position when it comes to films from that decade (you never forget your first love) Falconetti as an actress displays a mastery of acting for the camera, which any actor will tell you requires a very different set of techniques than acting for the stage, which is simply decades ahead of her time.
The music for this movie may have been intended to distract from the movie, i. e., the music may have been part of the censorship that the film was subject to upon its completion.
www.nga.gov/film-programs/off-screen-further-readings/restoring-original-orchestrations-for-silent-film.html