China vs. USA Nuclear War IS SCARY!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 лют 2023
  • Join Discord for More Info / discord
    Send me some stuff!
    P.O. Box 882195
    Port Saint Lucie Florida 34988
    Want to see more Videos? Check out new content on Facebook!
    / devildoggamer-28834045...
    Support me on Patreon
    / devildoggamer
    Instagram
    / thedevildoggamer
    Vlog Channel:
    ua-cam.com/channels/JMp.html...
    Twitch:
    / thedevildoggamer
    Need a Server check out Nitrado!
    nitra.do/DDG
    Follow me on Twitter:
    #!/DevilDogGamer
  • Ігри

КОМЕНТАРІ • 502

  • @TheDevildogGamer
    @TheDevildogGamer  Рік тому +52

    Would you survive the Nuclear War?

    • @xxSWxxNINJA
      @xxSWxxNINJA Рік тому +1

      Although this may appear one sided, that would still result in human life on Earth effectively ending. Nuclear Winter would drop average temperatures to below 15*c, for a very long time, food would all but vanish, our social and economic way of life would end completely. Nobody wins, even a small scale (Never going to stay small scale) nuclear exchange would end our known way of life. Once you realise this, you realise how unbelievably on the edge of destruction we truly are.

    • @bornwithsauce
      @bornwithsauce Рік тому +11

      Let's find out

    • @T12296Cagle
      @T12296Cagle Рік тому +2

      I live 8 miles away from a nuclear power plant in southern NJ theres literally no chance of survival in this area if that thing gets nuked and it would too because power station.

    • @357majmun
      @357majmun Рік тому +8

      Would you want to?

    • @destroydapacka
      @destroydapacka Рік тому

      Nope. I'm a rock stuck between two hard places less than 30 klicks from each other so I'm just gonna grab a deck chair, have a cold beer and jerk myself off until I'm insta dust.

  • @kennethschlegel870
    @kennethschlegel870 Рік тому +209

    my concern for a US response is how would we be able to launch over the pole without Russia losing their mind? "Trust me bro, they're going for china not you....."

    • @christophersnuffer1972
      @christophersnuffer1972 Рік тому +66

      If China launches, its a good assumption Russia has too.

    • @MrGriff305
      @MrGriff305 Рік тому +20

      ​@@christophersnuffer1972 exactly, China is friendly to Russia for this exact reason

    • @MOINMOIN586
      @MOINMOIN586 Рік тому

      okay, lets start Nuklear war against them

    • @mechadoggy
      @mechadoggy Рік тому +11

      The sanctions against Russia have especially made Russia friendly toward China since China is willing to be Russia’s economic partner after we have economically isolated Russia. This will naturally make Russia feel indebted towards China do that they will help China, like when China inevitably invades Taiwan or whatever. I do not think we will be able to win against China and Russia combined. I think we would lose, and I don’t mean “lose” as in packing your bags and going home, like at the end of the Vietnam War. I mean “lose” as in see quite a few of our cities destroyed or captured.

    • @user-ic2vw4ns8l
      @user-ic2vw4ns8l Рік тому +12

      @@mechadoggy america isn't alone it's whole world vs russia china nkorea iran

  • @madeconomist458
    @madeconomist458 Рік тому +102

    With as few nukes as they have, I think China would use a mostly counter-value strategy of ~100% civilian targets instead of 50/50 civ/military

    • @User-jr7vf
      @User-jr7vf Рік тому +1

      @@florinivan6907 Why do you say that the 'cops would be gone'? Are police officers in the USA not that dedicated to their job? I'm from Brazil and it is hard to imagine the same happening here, where the police is an autonomous branch of the Army and is forbiden by law of going on strike or creating associations.

    • @User-jr7vf
      @User-jr7vf Рік тому

      ​@@florinivan6907 I guessed that. I see news from your country where police officers are simply fired after some incident, and in the same fashion, they are easily hired. Here in Brazil serving in the police is nothing like that. It is a military career and the processes of joining and eventually leaving the force are lengthy.

    • @DD-sw1dd
      @DD-sw1dd Рік тому

      They’d target our farmland in the middle US along with a handful of military bases.
      The mentality required to launch first would be a lot like a suicide bomber. They’d look for long term meaningful damage if they couldn’t win. Which means forgoing military bases if it means we can’t grow our own food for god knows how long.

    • @juicebox6581
      @juicebox6581 Рік тому +8

      Somebody must have deleted a comment cause this comment string makes no sense

    • @horustrismegistus1017
      @horustrismegistus1017 10 місяців тому

      @@juicebox6581 Our criminally infiltrated FBI does that

  • @Tyko_prod
    @Tyko_prod Рік тому +20

    Those last few bombers were just a slap in the face lmao 😂

  • @TanukiDigital
    @TanukiDigital 11 місяців тому +14

    "Portland's gone, Seattle is gone." These terms are acceptable.

  • @brandondavis7777
    @brandondavis7777 Рік тому +51

    Seeing all those lights Dim as nukes laid waste to the coast was slightly disturbing. Millions of lives gone, plus millions more from the fall out and infrastructure damage.

    • @alexvujik4523
      @alexvujik4523 Рік тому

      What do you think will happen to civilisation when the food supply collapses because of radioactive water.

    • @mechadoggy
      @mechadoggy Рік тому +3

      This is why it remains absolutely critical for us to NOT get involved with the war in Ukraine. We CANNOT risk this war erupting into a wider conflict lest it mean the possible extinction of our species.

    • @rogue-ish5713
      @rogue-ish5713 Рік тому +1

      billions of lives gone and that was a gift. The punishment is the survivors

  • @jamesscalzo3033
    @jamesscalzo3033 Рік тому +2

    Loved the video @TheDevildogGamer! Can't wait for the next video of Broken Arrow, DCS, Nuclear War Simulator, or even Company of Heroes 3 man!
    If there's one thing to remember about Any Missile, it's this:
    "The Missile Knows where it is, Because it knows where it isn't..."

  • @DJChrisSee
    @DJChrisSee 4 місяці тому

    I love how the random pin drop outside of New York is pretty much right above my head.
    Thanks bro, making me feel real safe over here lol

  • @decker9911hg
    @decker9911hg Рік тому +43

    man i hope australia survives this

    • @1ch0
      @1ch0 Рік тому +3

      Thats a good question. Who would target Australia and why. Would you even be affected if all out nuclear war broke out?

    • @Itraininthebogs
      @Itraininthebogs Рік тому +3

      @@1ch0 they would 100% get fallout if japan is struck but it’s hard to picture a scenario where a country sends a nuke to Australia.

    • @Feargal011
      @Feargal011 Рік тому

      @@Itraininthebogs Pine Gap US spy base is targetted by China and Russia. The only town within about 1000 km is Alice Springs. Whether Australian military bases, ports are targets depends on the scenarios run. I still assume Philippines military ports would be hit. Maybe Vietnam depending on regional strains.

    • @Scottae89
      @Scottae89 Рік тому +23

      I’m in australia, we’d be all good. Our government will launch our intercontinental boomerangs 🪃

    • @Itraininthebogs
      @Itraininthebogs Рік тому

      @@Scottae89 😂😂 I’m in the states we are definitely getting it

  • @toniwilson6210
    @toniwilson6210 Рік тому +97

    Best guess is that China doesn’t actually have a missile for every silo.

    • @theflyinggasmask
      @theflyinggasmask Рік тому +15

      And bet their detection radars hardly work

    • @theproceedings4050
      @theproceedings4050 Рік тому +38

      Heck of a bet to make...

    • @viejitaloca2810
      @viejitaloca2810 Рік тому

      and bet that china doesnt exist and is actually a construct of our imagination

    • @DOSFS
      @DOSFS Рік тому +22

      @@theproceedings4050 There is a possibility that China build those silos to be decoys not intend to actually fill them with real ICBM.

    • @unbreakable7633
      @unbreakable7633 Рік тому +3

      And the ones they do have might not work or not reach their targets. Their tech is mostly lame. 1 of 5 aircraft are usually broken.

  • @christophermcneer9719
    @christophermcneer9719 Рік тому +6

    I hope you post more? I find it very interesting and helpful to understand the magnitude of destruction a nuclear war can cause.

    • @Brandough001
      @Brandough001 Рік тому +1

      You get an idea once that's the only idea you need.

  • @LEPRASE
    @LEPRASE Рік тому +5

    I would love to see more of these. I also loved your commentary on some military doctrine of the cold war and now regarding nuclear weapons, so if you could get more of that, that´d be great. Cheers from one of the iradiated places in Europe :D

  • @twistedbuscuit
    @twistedbuscuit Рік тому +34

    Interested to know how China and Russia V the rest of the nuclear powers would play out, given the rhetoric being espoused by both of countries towards not only the U.S but its allies also.

    • @victorpena3129
      @victorpena3129 Рік тому

      It will look like this even worse for china and Russia . This example doesn’t even include the known secret “ America has nuclear missions in Europe “.

    • @twistedbuscuit
      @twistedbuscuit Рік тому +3

      @Victor Peña consider that their focus won't solely be on the U.S. and Europe. Also, you'd have to take into consideration India firing nukes over the Himalayas, with the potential involvement from Pakistan. It would be interesting if, from the fall out, it would be total world devastation, or if there would be safe pockets of land, that could still be habitable.

    • @horustrismegistus1017
      @horustrismegistus1017 10 місяців тому

      In no scenario do we enter global nuclear war.
      Come back when I am correct, and the fools adamant about the idea, are invariably all proven wrong.

  • @turningnull2538
    @turningnull2538 Місяць тому +1

    Well the real issue is they don't tell us how many they really have, and they may pretend they only have like 500 or something..

  • @EsteemedBaboon
    @EsteemedBaboon Рік тому +3

    Like your vid’s devil dog. Been watching since the good old days

  • @mtn.lion_bait
    @mtn.lion_bait Рік тому +1

    It would be wild to watch from the Space Station.

  • @brandonbowerstx
    @brandonbowerstx Рік тому +1

    How do you get this scenario? Have you uploaded it as a mod?

  • @ViperOptix
    @ViperOptix Рік тому +1

    Do ICBMs rely on satellite/GPS? If so, if one side dominates space are the ICBM's still deployable?

  • @garygrandy9443
    @garygrandy9443 Рік тому +25

    I wonder what the Russians would say if there were a ton of nukes just flying over their airspace lol

    • @borreLore
      @borreLore Рік тому +7

      No kidding. If there was a nuclear war, there would be no silence from nuclear armed countries. They would all be like "Oh shit oh shit LAUNCH THE MISSILES" and just fire them off wherever. There would probably be a good incentive to target other countries that are a threat even if they didn't fire at you because those countries would be untouched while hundreds of your cities are burning.

    • @Steven-cf1ty
      @Steven-cf1ty Рік тому +3

      Violating the airspace for military purposes would probably be an act of war if it's ICBMs in the air, but they would probably be able to detect if the missiles are on a trajectory to impact them or another country.

    • @kupus6622
      @kupus6622 Рік тому

      'blyat!'

    • @Fr4Ged
      @Fr4Ged Рік тому

      @@Steven-cf1ty I am pretty sure that ICBMs operate above the "legal airspace" of those countries. But yeah, they would try to shoot them down anyways.

    • @ToniMorton
      @ToniMorton Рік тому

      @@Steven-cf1ty i assume russian detection systems would not be able to accurately estimate the trajectory until it reaches top of its arch. not to mention MIRVS are independently targetable
      i envision they would just launch..

  • @Bob-wg2co
    @Bob-wg2co Рік тому +1

    Almost at a million subs, almost there

  • @thesmugone4126
    @thesmugone4126 Рік тому +1

    is there a general nuclear exchange? where all nuclear armed countries fire their missiles rather than just two opposing countries?

  • @thrundawolf187
    @thrundawolf187 Рік тому +1

    is it possible to do an all out ww3 scenario where everyone is involved?

  • @decker9911hg
    @decker9911hg Рік тому

    who made the little "devildoggamer subscribe" pop up close to the start of the video? I saw the same one for a different channel and now im curious

  • @xfile900
    @xfile900 Рік тому

    Damn that's a dope simulation

  • @poil8351
    @poil8351 9 місяців тому

    also what happens to the panama canal. if that is destroyed then the world literally starves, shipping is forced into the suez canal and that will quickly become bogged down in a massive traffic nightmare.

  • @tomarsandbeyond
    @tomarsandbeyond 3 місяці тому

    I really want to try this out. My old computers are not fast enough.

  • @Spacemutiny
    @Spacemutiny Рік тому +16

    “Ain’t gonna miss em!” - best comment ever.

  • @cryptkeeper5027
    @cryptkeeper5027 Рік тому

    What’s the name of this game ? Where can I find it?

  • @aquellhappy1033
    @aquellhappy1033 Рік тому

    I love these videos you do, interesting stuff, you also sound like you know a few things, idk if you do but you sound like you do. nice

  • @Srrock61
    @Srrock61 Рік тому

    as a person that lives in Alaska, we won't miss you either.

  • @warlover22.
    @warlover22. Рік тому

    what program are you using?

  • @Rysander1
    @Rysander1 Рік тому

    Does this not simulate intercepts from THAAD, or the anti ballistic missiles at Ft Greeley?

    • @Techno_Idioto
      @Techno_Idioto Рік тому +1

      It can, but you would need to place them yourself.

    • @Aqua.man045
      @Aqua.man045 Рік тому

      THAAD cant even take down Hamas rockets in 2021. After Bibi came and thanked Trump for giving it to Israel in 2019. Doubt they would even see it on a radar.

  • @josephsheranda
    @josephsheranda Рік тому

    The target saturation is outdated. I didn't see any nukes targeting the military man-made islands built up in the South China Sea. Definitely need to take those out as part of an overwhelming response.

  • @zacknolan1300
    @zacknolan1300 Рік тому

    What is this simulator I would love to get it

  • @maryo5356
    @maryo5356 8 місяців тому +1

    what game is this?

  • @GMCGUY-
    @GMCGUY- Рік тому +1

    It would be awesome if you could maybe do a video on what would happen at like the after effects of nuclear war I am very curious on what will happen after the war is all done and finished how long will it take until the Earth is back to normal????

    • @ToniMorton
      @ToniMorton Рік тому

      hundreds of years most likely.

    • @stillcantbesilencedevennow
      @stillcantbesilencedevennow Рік тому

      Depends son what you mean by normal. The earth will turn, plants and animals will survive. Humans even might. Not all of em though. Not a lot of em.

    • @justanamericandoggo6725
      @justanamericandoggo6725 7 місяців тому

      Not long

  • @justjerm1823
    @justjerm1823 Рік тому

    “In 2025”
    Bruh, that’s two years and one of the countries are us 😂

  • @borb1921
    @borb1921 17 днів тому

    Germany like “what did I do 😭”

  • @cmhagstrom
    @cmhagstrom Рік тому

    Portland and Seattle won’t be missed? 10:01

  • @tylermccauley5513
    @tylermccauley5513 Рік тому

    I miss that intro you used to have in your videos

  • @vicsworld2289
    @vicsworld2289 Рік тому

    what is the name of the "game" ?

  • @stockfootagez
    @stockfootagez Рік тому

    what about China, Russia, NATO, US in different combinations??

  • @s4ss.m8
    @s4ss.m8 7 місяців тому

    Gotta do a NATO vs REDFOR (CN, RU, NK)

  • @Chexsum
    @Chexsum Рік тому

    we will all be stunnned for a day when it starts

    • @pyrobarbu6173
      @pyrobarbu6173 11 місяців тому

      but no longer than that because after we will die from global fallout through the whole world (except if you're chinese because odds are that you'll be already dead lucky bastard)

  • @RandomGuyV743
    @RandomGuyV743 Рік тому +2

    People who live in Seattle watching this with me included be like ✌️ seeee ya later 😂

  • @Agora2021
    @Agora2021 11 місяців тому

    Everyone always focuses on the initial deaths from impacts, fires and radiation, but the bulk would die over a period of a few months. Radiation sickness would claim a a lot, but billions would end up dying to starvation alone. All of the critical infrastructure and logistics would have entirely broken down, food wouldn't get to where it needs to go. Africa alone, despite not even being touched by a nuclear war, would probably shrink by half a billion if not more from lack of food imports and aid.

  • @djrazoredgeoftherevelator6868
    @djrazoredgeoftherevelator6868 11 місяців тому

    you forgot to include the treaty countrys with china and the usa

  • @charleshixon1458
    @charleshixon1458 10 місяців тому

    Heyo! I’m in Seattle, don’t lump us in with Portland. The cool people are just quiet over here.

  • @eliotkuo3640
    @eliotkuo3640 6 місяців тому

    What game is this

  • @macmaniac3080
    @macmaniac3080 11 місяців тому

    When you have 3000 nukes blowing up and you say you got out of it waaaaaaaaay better than they the other part…

  • @cliffordsmith8499
    @cliffordsmith8499 Рік тому

    Subed for the not missing Portland comment alone. Lol

  • @0BLACKESTFUN0
    @0BLACKESTFUN0 7 місяців тому +1

    guam being nuked 18 times is quite concerning xD

  • @buryitdeep
    @buryitdeep Рік тому +1

    That's a lot of fried rice.

  • @cookudysu90
    @cookudysu90 Рік тому

    Hi @TheDevildogGamer can you do a India VS Pakistan nuclear conflict please??? I love your videos ❤️

  • @wackomedic911
    @wackomedic911 Рік тому +13

    you should try and do a complex event, where the US/NATO clash with BRICS nations and its allies. should be interesting.

    • @TheBlackB0X
      @TheBlackB0X Рік тому +4

      This is the likely occurrence, but he's probably saving it for a final segment lol

    • @cpi3267
      @cpi3267 Рік тому

      BRICS???????????? it's an economic group

    • @galgonite312
      @galgonite312 Рік тому +9

      Brics is a economic alliance it has nothing to do with military

    • @changedpace9169
      @changedpace9169 Рік тому +2

      ​@Galgonite yes but outside of India it's basically who we will fight in ww3

    • @victorpena3129
      @victorpena3129 Рік тому

      It will look like this but more one sided when US Launches it’s missiles stored in Europe

  • @jungu156
    @jungu156 Рік тому

    So confident, come and try, do you have the guts?

  • @henrymoore9846
    @henrymoore9846 Рік тому

    I would survive anything (knock on wood)

  • @shleeep74
    @shleeep74 Рік тому

    Think its a possibility for them to be lieing about what they really have?

  • @TasteVengence
    @TasteVengence Рік тому

    There's also inda vs China or India vs Pakistan

  • @Im_just_one_guy
    @Im_just_one_guy Рік тому

    Please place someone in Texas too next time 😂🙏

  • @MrAmoney416
    @MrAmoney416 Рік тому

    2025? Let's just do it now.

  • @nealamesbury1480
    @nealamesbury1480 Рік тому

    Are u sure the world stays intact. ?

  • @braddimond7119
    @braddimond7119 Рік тому +4

    Haha portland gone. Aimt gonna miss em had me dying

  • @MrEtherguy
    @MrEtherguy 10 місяців тому +1

    The Chinese ones would probably mostly work, the Russian ones, I'm not so sure.

  • @johanthompson1463
    @johanthompson1463 Рік тому

    You should try USA 🇺🇸 vs. North Korea 🇰🇵 Nuclear War (even though the outcome may be pretty obvious)

  • @spencerstevens2175
    @spencerstevens2175 Рік тому

    Do India vs Pakistan. That's the most likely scenario for a nuclear exchange. Also both countries have insane population density

  • @jdfras9041
    @jdfras9041 11 місяців тому +1

    I would miss Washington and Oregon I live here LOL but I would love to see a close up of the projected wind patterns and the fall out in the Northwest. Thanks.

  • @lamsmiley1944
    @lamsmiley1944 4 місяці тому

    Nothing aimed at Australia? That doesn’t seem right

  • @leonardbakers
    @leonardbakers 10 місяців тому

    Any nuclear war is scary, Brainiac.

  • @hydra70
    @hydra70 Рік тому +2

    With their current arsenal, China wouldn't bother with military targets. They would go for maximum civilian casualties. They don't have enough missiles to disarm the US to prevent their own destruction, and since they would be destroyed, hitting conventional military targets would be useless. They would try to do as much damage as possible by hitting as many cities as possible.

    • @florinivan6907
      @florinivan6907 Рік тому +1

      The problem is the US mirror images other countries. Disarming first strikes require not only at least an equal(actually more) number of nukes but a huge intel collection system. Only the US has a trully global system and even that is partially held up by US allies. The chinese would most likely conduct strikes on air force and naval installations including reserve plus obviously the US capital which strangely was not targeted. If you take a map and look up where those are located most are near urban centers. A strike only focused on these would devastate scores of large and medium sized cities killing upwards of 25 million and crippling the US as a country. To give just a couple of examples the combined population of the Honolulu Seattle Norfolk and San Diego metro areas where the 4 largest naval complexes and several other military installations are located is close to 9 million. LA has a Space Force base next to LAX. The second largest US city is pretty much a target just because of that.The US keeps talking about the silos because that's how the US hopes an enemy would fight. Nuking the silos means US bases on both coasts are in one piece. It seems though that US adversaries have noticed this fact and are only looking at the coastlines.

    • @ajaykumarsingh702
      @ajaykumarsingh702 11 місяців тому

      China's current arsenal is unknown and many reports have claimed for years that China easily has 1200+ nukes in its active arsenal.
      Considering their industrial prowess that surpasses the combined Western world, I think that might be true indeed.

    • @hydra70
      @hydra70 11 місяців тому +1

      @@ajaykumarsingh702 No, we have a pretty good idea how large their arsenal is. It's about 400 warheads. They are currently undergoing a massive expansion though.

  • @darkwing.17
    @darkwing.17 5 місяців тому

    The US West Coast will really be toast in this scenario.

  • @joosiekawk
    @joosiekawk 7 місяців тому

    this is a simulation based on China having only "250" nuclear missiles (since the 1970's). You think CHina still has only 250 ?

  • @kevenmiles7121
    @kevenmiles7121 Рік тому

    Do if North Korea launched one at like south Korea like they always say they will do

    • @Techno_Idioto
      @Techno_Idioto Рік тому

      Result is pretty obvious: NK gets fucking glassed.

    • @kevenmiles7121
      @kevenmiles7121 Рік тому

      @@Techno_Idioto hah definitely I was just wondering if they could land any back before that

  • @andrewvanorden2336
    @andrewvanorden2336 Рік тому

    Hey I'm in Florida too. Over by Melbourne

  • @tylerjoseph7378
    @tylerjoseph7378 Рік тому +1

    US vs Russia and China would be cool

  • @PianoMan-hx3ev
    @PianoMan-hx3ev Рік тому +2

    Once the missiles are out of their silos, are they vulnerable to emp?

    • @Heggy420
      @Heggy420 Рік тому

      i was wondering this awhile ago, wonder if they could detonate a emp device in space and potentially stop them?

    • @PianoMan-hx3ev
      @PianoMan-hx3ev Рік тому

      @@Heggy420 That would be GREAT.

    • @victorpena3129
      @victorpena3129 Рік тому

      At a budget of 700 billion a year for decades I highly doubt the US doesn’t have a counter emp or hypersonic interception capabilities

    • @muzaharsherazi8419
      @muzaharsherazi8419 Рік тому

      ​@@victorpena3129 as if every thing is went into military gear development and not in the industries deep pockets.

  • @patwiggins6969
    @patwiggins6969 11 місяців тому +1

    Even with the catostrophic losses China would still have over 700 million people left. Unreal

    • @josh7352
      @josh7352 9 місяців тому +1

      don't forget the fallout, lasts up to centuries.

  • @floridaman318
    @floridaman318 Рік тому

    You would be from port saint Lucie with a morbid fascination with nuclear war and MAD. 😉

  • @silas9203
    @silas9203 Рік тому

    Lmfaooo they made that naval base a non nuclear priority to flex the us navy

  • @SC-bc2yh
    @SC-bc2yh Рік тому

    I’d rather be ruled by GPT5 after seeing this

  • @juicebox6581
    @juicebox6581 Рік тому

    As an alaskan, i will definitely miss me 🙄

  • @ascend7172
    @ascend7172 Рік тому

    Where are the nuclear submarines of china and usa

  • @fpvaemon
    @fpvaemon Рік тому

    I guess the number of nuclear missles from a certain point of view is irrelevant. Wouldnt a few strategic missles be enough for nuclear winter and kill 99 percent of human life?

    • @Mosoman42
      @Mosoman42 Рік тому +3

      No

    • @JamesSmith-ix5jd
      @JamesSmith-ix5jd Рік тому +5

      lol 99% is not possible even if all nukes are used. humanity survives regardless, but it will be thrown back in time for 300 years if not more.

  • @umutatasayar2528
    @umutatasayar2528 Рік тому

    Just while usa lounched a big plane ofensive and flyed ower russia ı heard bounch of planes outside 😟

  • @Untouchable7641
    @Untouchable7641 Рік тому

    Can you do either India and Pakistan, or the US and north Korea pleaseee

  • @GeorgeNzioki-ls6nn
    @GeorgeNzioki-ls6nn 10 місяців тому

    Why do the Us nuke subs get sunk by some Chinese subs if cinvrntiknabweaoons

  • @user-pf9eq8be7h
    @user-pf9eq8be7h 5 місяців тому

    excuse me I live right by portland :(

  • @orangemoonglows2692
    @orangemoonglows2692 Рік тому +1

    it makes zero sense to engage in nuclear war. zero.

  • @weaponizedace3231
    @weaponizedace3231 Рік тому

    does it model ballistic missile defence?

    • @TheDevildogGamer
      @TheDevildogGamer  Рік тому

      Yes but we have 40 something GBIs not worth it

    • @weaponizedace3231
      @weaponizedace3231 Рік тому

      @@TheDevildogGamer oof, but with someone like Russia who has alot of GBIs and SAM sites would that make a big difference?

    • @TheDevildogGamer
      @TheDevildogGamer  Рік тому

      Sams cant intercept ICBMs and they have like 5 ABMs around moscow

    • @weaponizedace3231
      @weaponizedace3231 Рік тому

      @@TheDevildogGamer damn, I thought Russia had purpose built S-300 sites for BMD, also are the ABM sites built into the ground like a silo or are they mobile? Also I'm pretty sure sams can intercept the reentry vehicles when they are coming down at like mach 69 and can't turn cuz they are too fast

    • @weaponizedace3231
      @weaponizedace3231 10 місяців тому

      @@FunnyVideoCollector but cant it target them before they split, and even if they do split they must get some of them

  • @TheDataWorkshop
    @TheDataWorkshop Рік тому +2

    This software solution is not a sound assessment of a nuclear exchange between China and the US. The Chinese mostly have megaton grade warheads and would deploy those mostly against cities were any nuclear weapon deployed on its mainland at this level of volume. It's unclear what their stockpile really is, there's evidence to suggest they have more than it reported. The Chinese definitely have rockets of several makes that can reach effectively all the entire continental US at this point, not just the west coast. However, from a counter-value standpoint, striking "just" the coastal cities would do tremendous damage to US, and I wouldn't think it would be able to recover from that strike, not as a world power. All of innovation and mindshare of the country are effectively concentrated along the West and Northeast. Furthermore, the targeting schedule the computer picked is absurd, given how many missiles were deployed on an asset like Guam. Very likely, the US government would collapse at the very least after the exchange, as continuity of governance assessments from the Nixon Era concluded just 30% to 40% damage to key urban environments would like prevent continuity of governance. Lastly we need to have secondary effects from nuclear winter modeled, hopefully the developer implements those soon.

    • @Techno_Idioto
      @Techno_Idioto Рік тому +1

      I mean, you can make your own, more realistic, scenario if you really want to. Nobody's stopping you.

    • @TheDataWorkshop
      @TheDataWorkshop Рік тому

      @Techno Idioto working on it

  • @randywells8974
    @randywells8974 Рік тому

    Hello vault TEC calling

  • @NerdistheWay
    @NerdistheWay Рік тому

    Try India vs China, it's more "balanced" and also realistic

  • @MOINMOIN586
    @MOINMOIN586 Рік тому

    okay, lets start nukear war

  • @auroraleiborden4502
    @auroraleiborden4502 Рік тому

    Well...Guam is gone...what do u mean it's gone...I mean it's not there anymore 😂

  • @bobbob-sv4mk
    @bobbob-sv4mk 11 місяців тому

    Why not? Just for good measure!

  • @jtrec7157
    @jtrec7157 Рік тому

    Comment for Dat algorithm

  • @honkinsplus3522
    @honkinsplus3522 Рік тому

    Do North Korea

  • @matk4731
    @matk4731 Рік тому

    They want AU$42.00 on Steam. I think they are dreaming.

  • @Gazerbites123
    @Gazerbites123 Рік тому

    No winners, no matter.

  • @paulkenney1074
    @paulkenney1074 Рік тому

    Be realistic do BRICS nation members vs nato members