How Powerful is America's Patriot Missiles

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 жов 2019
  • The MIM-104 Patriot is a surface-to-air missile (SAM) system, the primary of its kind used by the United States Army and several allied nations. It is manufactured by the U.S. defense contractor Raytheon and derives its name from the radar component of the weapon system. The AN/MPQ-53 at the heart of the system is known as the "Phased Array Tracking Radar to Intercept on Target" which is a backronym for PATRIOT.
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1 тис.

  • @USMilitary_News
    @USMilitary_News  Рік тому +1

    New Video!!
    ua-cam.com/video/yGfS5QR2om8/v-deo.html

  • @eyoutube1
    @eyoutube1 2 роки тому +3

    Gotta give them props for the acronym working out

  • @jstetzer01
    @jstetzer01 4 роки тому +24

    I was a PATRIOT Battery 1SG Dharan, Saudi Arabia. Later a CSM for a PATRIOT Battalion in Kuwait. With the right maintainers the systems worked excellent.

    • @deltabravolima1514
      @deltabravolima1514 4 роки тому +2

      Same, just not in Saudi. And your very right

    • @joehentalack2443
      @joehentalack2443 3 роки тому

      Not on 9/11.....

    • @virginccyy7645
      @virginccyy7645 3 роки тому

      @@joehentalack2443 the US wasn't expecting airplanes to be used as missiles. So they were caught unprepared, but today is a different story...many systems have been placed just in case such a scenario were to unfold.

    • @virginccyy7645
      @virginccyy7645 3 роки тому

      I just read about the systems and I know they work very well....I mean the radar from the Patriot from the Gulf War was pretty advanced that the Army decided to use it against scuds and those were Pac 2s meant for jets and planes. So if it's working properly by the operators
      It shall do a very good job of destroying BALLISTIC missiles and planes. 4 batteries containing pac2s and pac3s should protect the area very well.

    • @joehentalack2443
      @joehentalack2443 3 роки тому +1

      @@virginccyy7645 They actually did....they had drills at the Pentagon for exactly such attacks....but much of these 9/11 info have vanished from UA-cam.

  • @josephpacchetti5997
    @josephpacchetti5997 2 роки тому

    Great Channel, Thanks for Posting. 🇺🇸

  • @Adrian-dn6lw
    @Adrian-dn6lw 3 роки тому +24

    Romania just bought 7 of these systems ,seems reliable

    • @Cal49ers
      @Cal49ers 3 роки тому +2

      @Marciel Luta 😳😂😂that's what you thought, is that why you have only one aircraft carrier and your plane can't match with the #1 USA😂😂

    • @shahabrashidi49
      @shahabrashidi49 3 роки тому

      Saudi Arabia think that too but etc.

  • @mehdiasgharzadeh5162
    @mehdiasgharzadeh5162 4 роки тому +204

    I absolutely love the idea of blowing up a 200 $ drone by a 3.4 million $ surface to air missile.

    • @CowboyCarCrushing
      @CowboyCarCrushing 4 роки тому +11

      That's how Ballers do it 👍👊

    • @bestamerica
      @bestamerica 4 роки тому +1

      hi M A...
      '
      dont need to comment in here about american currencys...
      not important to know...
      what about china = iran = north korea = ussr has too many waste waste their own currencys for missiles

    • @mtevilone
      @mtevilone 4 роки тому +18

      They wanted to show it was capable of hitting something that small, not that they are going to waste them on them normally. We have tech that we are developing to take drones out. You should watch the video instead of criticizing everything US military.

    • @jackietate4047
      @jackietate4047 4 роки тому +4

      It looks like they better start testing a little more robustly, because allies are dumping the Patriot in favor of the S-400.

    • @michaelmarkmartiniii8139
      @michaelmarkmartiniii8139 4 роки тому +4

      Sure can hit a small target, big ones don't have a chance.

  • @fightingfalcon1986
    @fightingfalcon1986 4 роки тому +1

    A well done documentary video about this air defense system, although the video icon depicts another system more older, perhaps (judging the image) a Nike-Hercules or a Soviet S-125 Neva/Pechora (US/NATO reporting name SA-3 Goa).

  • @tobyihli9470
    @tobyihli9470 3 роки тому +1

    The full version, totally upgraded system can be up and ready to go in one hour? That’s impressive!

  • @MilitaryUpdate
    @MilitaryUpdate 4 роки тому +27

    US never give up!

    • @shanebantell2786
      @shanebantell2786 4 роки тому +1

      Why do your little fucking jabronies and lackeys in Washington have underground bunkers and fallout she built nationwide?

    • @Aduysvmncmkouyf
      @Aduysvmncmkouyf 3 роки тому +1

      @@shanebantell2786 Hmm I wonder maybe cause hes the PRESIDENT

    • @bestamerica
      @bestamerica 3 роки тому

      hi M U...
      '
      yeaa keeep up american strong military

  • @tekkee5848
    @tekkee5848 4 роки тому +3

    This is what so call the power.

  • @dainisstranga4440
    @dainisstranga4440 3 роки тому +5

    Good Bless America and friends.... ❤️❤️❤️

  • @richardmanfredi3352
    @richardmanfredi3352 3 роки тому

    Thank you , Dan Quayle.

  • @tonyjackson4099
    @tonyjackson4099 3 роки тому +4

    It's because of missile defense systems like this and the Russian and Chinese equivalents, that the USA, Russia, and China have been focusing so much effort on developing hypersonic missiles.
    Hypersonic missiles would travel at such great velocities, Mach 5+, or almost 4,000 mph, that no current missile-defense system would be able to track and shoot it down.

    • @dank9288639
      @dank9288639 2 роки тому

      Russia has a system that can take out hypersonic missiles

    • @aus2908
      @aus2908 4 місяці тому

      Hi, I'm from 2024. This comment didn't age well 😂😂😂

  • @a1marine105
    @a1marine105 3 роки тому +4

    The army pairs this with thaad that's gonna be a op combo when integrated with the f35

  • @Mustangrocket98
    @Mustangrocket98 3 роки тому +1

    That missile and the s500 are my favorite

  • @santosolmedasantana8526
    @santosolmedasantana8526 4 роки тому

    Thank You

  • @rolfstamenov9914
    @rolfstamenov9914 4 роки тому +4

    16 tango here.....
    The Patriots Phased array radar we were told when we were in the Army if you put 3000 pencils down range it can track each one so the Patriot can track each piece of debris when the scud missile is breaking up or any other low-tech weapon that means that the Warhead is lo-tech also and the proximity fuse Warhead of the Patriot needs to either engage directly or it's not going to destroy it also in Saudi Arabia they have Bad roubds sometimes and that's what happens when the missile comes out of the can and then crashes several hundred yards in front of the launcher
    At McGregor range I've seen Patriots stinger Pershing II Nike Atmos Nike Hercules Vulcan and many other systems fire while I was in

  • @virginccyy7645
    @virginccyy7645 8 місяців тому

    The Patriot Pacs are being produced at 500 missiles per year, now its going to go to 750 Pac2s and Pac3s per year. The Navy is also considered putting them in their Mark41 vertical launchers the reason is because Lockhed Martin has the capacity to expand production relatively easy compared to building SM3s and SM6s!

  • @matthewroberts3442
    @matthewroberts3442 3 роки тому

    Great video😎👍👍

  • @rahmand9427
    @rahmand9427 4 роки тому +7

    Very Nice!. America still no.1 in military power in the world.

  • @kembarkembar2365
    @kembarkembar2365 4 роки тому +4

    MANTAP POWER FULL☝💪👌

  • @sellamibenamorkhaled1315
    @sellamibenamorkhaled1315 3 роки тому +2

    Haute technologie + mach3 vitres incroyable pour des altitudes très haut .. très efficaces

  • @curtislarson1487
    @curtislarson1487 4 роки тому

    I was a tda when 4/3 deployed to giessen germany it sure changed.

  • @Baskara0490
    @Baskara0490 4 роки тому +6

    Yaman is striking again.
    Patriot : Sorry i can’t handle it 🤣

    • @duxd1452
      @duxd1452 4 роки тому

      The Patriot wasn't developed for low-flying objects. You'd need SHORAD systems for that. The S400 would not have faired any better. It's a simple result of the laws of physics that systems optimized to intercept fast, high flying objects will have trouble with slow, low flying ones.

    • @Baskara0490
      @Baskara0490 4 роки тому

      Dux D if not developed for low flying object and expensive. 😁
      I thought it has complete spec as S400 ( 60km to 250km radius )

    • @duxd1452
      @duxd1452 4 роки тому

      @@Baskara0490 The S400 has the exact same limitations. The S400 is also incapable of effectively targeting low flying cruise missiles or drones. At Khmeimmim base in Syria the S400 battery has not managed to intercept even a single drone in dozens of attacks. In fact, even the Russian SHORAD systems have been performing poorly; the pantsyr has hit only 18% of its targets at Khmeimmim airbase.
      And the S400 does not have a 250 km range. That 250 km is the maximum brochure range for a 4m2 RCS target. But brochure ranges are theoretical maximums never reached in real life scenarios and modern fighters present a much smaller RCS than 4m2. Against a modern F35 for example the range drops down to as little as 16 km (calculated based on brochure capabilities). And that is not even taking into account jamming and other countermeasures.

    • @Baskara0490
      @Baskara0490 4 роки тому

      Dux D POORLY but TURKI CHINA and INDIA bought it. After ARAB got Attacked, who came to RUSSIA to get s400?
      If really POOR why The US always barking about SANCTIONS to any country that wanna buy S400?
      LOL, scared HAH?
      In speed comparisons PATRIOT just like OLD mini Cooper.
      Wanna tell you again. S400 got 4 missiles ( 40,120,250, and 400 km distance)
      Max speed of S400 is MACH 14 while PATRIOT only reach MACH 4.1.
      1 billion missiles only reach MACH 4.1, WHAT a JUNK?
      Maximum Flight altitude s400 : 185km
      While PATRIOT ONLY can reach 24.2 km. What a JOKE?

    • @Baskara0490
      @Baskara0490 4 роки тому

      Dux D i trust experts not you. 😁
      Do you think Russian made s400 not base on REAL WORLD performance? 😁

  • @amarin053
    @amarin053 4 роки тому +18

    Patriot missiles in Saudi Arabia didn't work by Drone attack inside oil facilities in KSA. Why?

    • @ahernandez65
      @ahernandez65 4 роки тому +9

      John Pierre Because the patriot is shit!

    • @sugar-lx1jz
      @sugar-lx1jz 4 роки тому +1

      @@ahernandez65 At least they know how to build something functional but still imperfect rather than shit talk like you who knows only shit.

    • @ahernandez65
      @ahernandez65 4 роки тому +1

      uber channel s-125 is better.

    • @th0r_f1nn
      @th0r_f1nn 4 роки тому +2

      Patriot is not automated, it needs good operators
      Thats why the oil plant blew up, probaly because the operators of the patriot battery were not trained well enough

    • @Thetequilashooter1
      @Thetequilashooter1 3 роки тому +2

      A Hernandez LOL, of course a Russian troll would make such a ridiculous statement. Show me any video of a Russian SAM intercepting either a ballistic or cruise missile in flight. The Patriot has been around for decades, and upgraded many times, and it has intercepted missiles in combat, something that a Russian SAM has never done.

  • @Homoprimatesapiens
    @Homoprimatesapiens 4 роки тому +3

    First. The air defenders needs a head shift towards the right direction. Second. They have to go back to the drawing board and design air defending missiles that are comparable to the S-300, S-400 and S-500 of Russia. Or switch over to laser defending technology.

    • @snsproduc
      @snsproduc Рік тому

      totally the wrong thing to due. The Russian s-300, s-whatever isn't close to the US needs of ballistic missile defense.

  • @thomasfulmer2158
    @thomasfulmer2158 Рік тому

    Does the Patriot missle system come with the C-ram system for protection. This system could be an easy target for Russian anti- radiation missles specifically designed for systems like the Patriot. Also it takes up alot of area, can be easily seen from reconasence and satellite. Takes weeks, even many months to train to operate. Just my personal opinion, but I think placing C-rams and the NASAMS in the needed areas would be sufficient and less costly.

  • @erbenton07
    @erbenton07 4 роки тому +4

    Ditch the background snow.

  • @chazgurrero3090
    @chazgurrero3090 4 роки тому +17

    The day we fall behind in military technology is the day we would be in danger of losing our Constitutional free rights. So keep up the great job to all involved. Most importantly thank you GOD. The ultimate solution. Though no one can see it, in it's shadow,The truth stands strong.

    • @jubeiorigami4096
      @jubeiorigami4096 4 роки тому +2

      That day has long Past. The US is falling behind. Wake up to Reality.

    • @Joe_Friday
      @Joe_Friday 4 роки тому +1

      @fairplayall They've been talking about taking Taiwan by force. Those people do not want to live under an oppressive communist regime. Seen the protesters in Hong Kong? They wave the US flag 🇺🇸. They do not want to be under an oppressive communist regime.

    • @Gog3453
      @Gog3453 4 роки тому +2

      chaz Gurrero we’ve all ready lost our freedom. Let it go

    • @sjive830
      @sjive830 4 роки тому +1

      Joe Friday protesters in Hong Kong waive the US flag because they are backed by them and their NGO’s, as they once again spread choas around the globe through domestic terrorism. You think all the homeless, poverty and uneducated In the ... and i quote ... “richest nation in history” isnt oppressive, pls ur just so dumbed down and brainwashed you fail to see the US is an oligarchy that preys on its citizens and the rest of the world through exploitation.

    • @fbc6345
      @fbc6345 4 роки тому +1

      Russian s-400 is better

  • @waldensmith4796
    @waldensmith4796 3 роки тому

    The Patriot Missile Defence System upgrade with the latest technology will prove to be a great Military asset against the enemy incoming missiles.

  • @ihl8608
    @ihl8608 3 роки тому +1

    I remember the Patriot system did get a few scud missiles during Desert storm

    • @Bizzon666
      @Bizzon666 3 роки тому +1

      It was reported then, but if you check now it looks like Patriot probably intercepted only ONE single missile in reality! It's kind of crazy, but they say "first casualty of the war is the truth", most of reported "intercepts" were just propaganda.

    • @richardrykard3246
      @richardrykard3246 3 роки тому

      Crap doesn't work

  • @ravyteav212
    @ravyteav212 4 роки тому +4

    Thumps up!

  • @freedomwomansolovelyonebec4465
    @freedomwomansolovelyonebec4465 4 роки тому +7

    The MIM-104 Patriot is a surface-to-air missile, but how far Patriot missile can hit to enemies warhead????.

    • @MrBuknoy29
      @MrBuknoy29 4 роки тому

      50 -50

    • @keithmckenzie1569
      @keithmckenzie1569 4 роки тому

      A patriot missile can only hit a patriot missile it's too slow to hit a Chinese or a Russian missile you can't hit something you can't catch

    • @RicardoMrMendes
      @RicardoMrMendes 4 роки тому

      100 miles range and 20 kms altitude pac 2 yeah its enougth to take out su 35 and su 57

    • @RicardoMrMendes
      @RicardoMrMendes 4 роки тому

      Its a mach 5 missile

    • @RicardoMrMendes
      @RicardoMrMendes 4 роки тому

      More like 90 per cent shoot

  • @matthewroberts3442
    @matthewroberts3442 3 роки тому

    Cool stuff😎👍👍🚀💣God bless the good guys!

  • @kamalahmedkhan5568
    @kamalahmedkhan5568 4 роки тому

    Real talk to you

  • @dante-yq6gg
    @dante-yq6gg 4 роки тому +11

    The United States must develope many of this and land defense like tanks

    • @khansaid655
      @khansaid655 4 роки тому +1

      UNITED STATES MUST DEVOLOPE MORE GAYS TO SEND THEM TO AFGHANISTAN. TALIBAN MISS THEM VERY MUCH

  • @Mishn0
    @Mishn0 4 роки тому +18

    The thumbnail is of Soviet SA-3 "Goa"/S-125 Pechora missile launcher with "PAC-3" photoshopped onto them. At least try....

    • @Bizzon666
      @Bizzon666 3 роки тому

      Yeah, but I must admit that the S-125 Neva/Pechora are great looking missiles.

  • @johnknapp952
    @johnknapp952 4 роки тому

    How come the cover photo shows what looks like an the SA-6 quad missile setup?

  • @Rafael-ql4dd
    @Rafael-ql4dd 4 роки тому +2

    The pansirs S1 it work wonderful, Imagine the S300 or even the S 400.

  • @Stephen-cr3sc
    @Stephen-cr3sc 3 роки тому +6

    I rarely hear Canada listed for ungraded military equipment. I believe that's because they live under the U.S. defense umbrella. It wouldn't surprise me to learn Canada pays into the U.S. defense budget, but their defenses only need to hold invaders off for a handful of hours. Getting civilian aircraft out of the sky, getting civilian ships and boats into port, before the U.S. heavy transports are landing in their airports and The U.S. Navy is blockading their waters from invading forces. The U.S. is intolerant of North America being attacked. They're funny that way. (Not to mention troops, patriot missile systems, flights of battle and troop-carrying helicopters, and main battle tanks rolling across the shared border.)
    Canada's best bet is to go into lockdown and stay well out of the way, The 800-pound gorilla directly to the south is really pissed-off.
    I suspect someone trying to invade Mexico would face the same result.

    • @soldierstudio3087
      @soldierstudio3087 2 роки тому

      English Royals are directing USA Politicians to convert the USA to a commonwealth. They want their colonies Back. World wide 500 years of Drug dealing is England's main industry Prince Charles must Die as all royals should die for the USA to regain Freedom, Independence. They own a media monopoly here thanks to the agents Clinton's. They own our media, resources. get active , share the weight

  • @attunofficial2873
    @attunofficial2873 4 роки тому +3

    American's in practureed in indonesian for RUSSIA USA sistem for indonesia purleded the ammo

  • @coolie4u
    @coolie4u 4 роки тому +1

    Scandinavian countries are also getting the Patriot system and train with the US. Fantastic that we can work together to protect our countries and citizens.

  • @edwindelacruz7357
    @edwindelacruz7357 4 роки тому +2

    America should have it ready anytime for its purpose.

  • @patrickanderson8732
    @patrickanderson8732 4 роки тому +8

    I am a 14E Patriot Fire Control Enhanced Operator/maintainer. There is some truth to this video not all of it is accurate though.

    • @littlebird7637
      @littlebird7637 4 роки тому

      So why patriot is so helpless and overpriced? seems like real waste of money

    • @TwentytenS4B8
      @TwentytenS4B8 4 роки тому +2

      @@littlebird7637 Everything about the missile system would not be disclosed. Things are classified for a reason.

    • @littlebird7637
      @littlebird7637 4 роки тому +1

      @@TwentytenS4B8 sure they are, specialy with S400...

    • @virginccyy7645
      @virginccyy7645 2 роки тому

      @@littlebird7637 Russian S400s ballistic tech is basic compared to the pac 3 mse. S500 is basically adding another system to the S400 to a more capable ballistic anti denial system!

    • @virginccyy7645
      @virginccyy7645 2 роки тому

      @@littlebird7637 its pac3 missile is the same price of a 40N6 but the sensor of pac3 is a lot more sophisticated with hit to kill vs blast fragmentation. Hit to kill is way more effective as it destroys the missile..that's why US upgraded all its sensors and designs for these anti ballistics while Russia just upgraded it this year with that tech.
      Those upgrades are expensive vs blast fragmentation which doesnt alway get the ballistic missile useless often second hand damage spills out!

  • @wisdomcharles6664
    @wisdomcharles6664 4 роки тому +10

    Recently it entered politics in Saudi oil drones attacks , wonderful missile defense....🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

  • @tuttinuttchariyamas6065
    @tuttinuttchariyamas6065 4 роки тому

    Good Patriot Missile I'm Like It .

  • @killingfields1424
    @killingfields1424 4 роки тому +1

    Its like the old F-104 Starfighter, its not what you think it is

  • @H10933X
    @H10933X 4 роки тому +11

    S400 in front of Patriot.. "am I joke to u"

    • @michaelmartin436
      @michaelmartin436 4 роки тому +5

      When compared to PAC-2, they are about the same.
      When compared to PAC-3, the S400 is a joke.

    • @Rumbler298
      @Rumbler298 4 роки тому +4

      @@michaelmartin436 whoa whoa u must be kidding. Get your fact right there bud. Even the performance and range of S-300 alone makes the PAC-3 look like a peashooter how much more an S-400. History speaks for itself even the outdated but upgraded S-125 pechora shoot down what was called the most advanced and first stealth aircraft at the time the F-117 nighthawk. The U-2 spy plane that was meant to out altitude any soviet missile got shoot by an S-75 Dvina. I just don't see how the Patriot compares to the S-300, 400 and 500.
      True, the S-300 and 400 are not yet combat proven but how about the older S-75 and S-125 that the S-300 and 400 replaced? sorry burst your bubble but Russian surface to air missile technology is ahead of US 🤣

    • @michaelmartin436
      @michaelmartin436 4 роки тому +4

      @@Rumbler298 The S400 uses a proximity fuse explosive to try and destroy ballistic missiles. This is what the US tried in 1990-1991, and it did not work very well. That is why with PAC-3 (and THAAD) they moved to a kinetic kill warhead.
      A great many of us expect that the first time somebody tries to shoot down a ballistic missile with the S400, it will be much the same as when the US tried it 30 years ago. They will get some hits, but because it is not optimized for ballistic missiles, they will largely be ineffective.
      I know what I am talking about here, especially when looking at the entire system. Add in other things like reload times and the S400 is not as great as it sounds to an amateur.

    • @Rumbler298
      @Rumbler298 4 роки тому +1

      @@michaelmartin436 True, the S-400 was meant as a SAM not a baillistic missile defense. its ballistic missile defense is only secondary. If a lot of ballistic missile were coming I would have the THAAD as it specialized in balllistic missile defense and if a load of enemy aircraft is expected then I would have the S-400. S-400 is a jack-of-all trades while the THAAD is a specialist. the PAC-3 is outdated and US is already upgrading them to PAAC-4 which would have extended range but even that don't go close to the range of the S-300 let alone a 400. I dunno why the US still calls the patriot as a long range SAM. It has almost identical range and capabilities to the upgraded russian TOR SAM but the ruskies calls the TOR just a medium range missile

    • @michaelmartin436
      @michaelmartin436 4 роки тому +1

      @@Rumbler298 Sorry, wrong. PAC-4 is like PAC-2, a software upgrade. Just as PAC-2 used the original missiles, PAC-4 uses the same missiles (GEM, PAC-3) as the system used before PAC-4. All it did was streamline the software inside of the system.
      And PATRIOT was never "long range", not sure where you get that from. It is local area defense only, that is all it was ever said to be. Same as SHORAD (and CIWS that it came from) was always called "Point Defense".

  • @blackfox4567
    @blackfox4567 4 роки тому +5

    K S A We saw how it works

  • @405boy4
    @405boy4 2 роки тому +1

    I would've liked to see the US bring the MEADS Air Defence system, but if the Patriot has been upgraded; cool 😎.

  • @richardharrington7748
    @richardharrington7748 3 роки тому

    Has this technology been incorporated for ground targets

  • @dirtydoopmole9269
    @dirtydoopmole9269 4 роки тому +11

    Tell this to the Saudis

  • @noeldelossantos3737
    @noeldelossantos3737 4 роки тому +27

    What about happened in saudi oil field?

    • @colejones594
      @colejones594 4 роки тому +1

      noel delos santos you do know the patriot system was made to shot down aircraft originally not even a thought to missile defense and it can do that pretty well and later it was upgraded for missile defense when it became critical it can intercept missiles but not very well you can upgrade it but if the system itself isnt designed around missile defense it wont preform its best also i do have to say direct kill missile for missile defense is stupid proximity explosion with HE fragmentation warhead would work better for missile defense

    • @szahmad2416
      @szahmad2416 4 роки тому +2

      To hear the Americans tell it, they were pointing in the wrong direction 🤣.

    • @swapnilpokhariyal2586
      @swapnilpokhariyal2586 3 роки тому

      Missile is useless , world has seen a group of terrorist attack Saudi oil unit result a total disaster for USA

  • @thezestypatriot8513
    @thezestypatriot8513 3 роки тому +2

    “Launchers capable of up to 4 missiles each”. Just a tad bit off there. 😂

  • @jaimeg9524
    @jaimeg9524 4 роки тому

    hipersonic missle in space to destroy nucler missle

  • @hocares6983
    @hocares6983 4 роки тому +9

    It never works against drone attack that damages aramco oil company

    • @RicardoMrMendes
      @RicardoMrMendes 4 роки тому +2

      Pac 2 can shoot down su 57 and j 20

    • @RicardoMrMendes
      @RicardoMrMendes 4 роки тому +2

      And also su 35 and j 10

    • @RicardoMrMendes
      @RicardoMrMendes 4 роки тому +1

      So patriot mach 5 100 nautical miles range 20 kms altitude is perfect for anti acess air defense

    • @hocares6983
      @hocares6983 4 роки тому +1

      @@RicardoMrMendes there are gadget a radio control device that stop drone flyng above it, pls check it out in youtube

    • @sergiobeltran8258
      @sergiobeltran8258 4 роки тому +1

      The weapon is only as good as the person operating it.

  • @rhondaclark716
    @rhondaclark716 4 роки тому +3

    We need drones to save America lives , and better missile , defense systems

    • @keithmckenzie1569
      @keithmckenzie1569 4 роки тому +1

      America is the only country that cant mind there own business . Or get along with other countries. All the other countries get along with each other..one day. America will have sanctions from other countries. The sleeping giant

    • @khansaid655
      @khansaid655 4 роки тому

      I ASK U WHERE WERE UR TECHNOLOGIES WHEN TALIBAN FILLED THE ANALS OF AMERICAN SOLDIERS WITH MILK HAHAHA. PLS DNT SEND GAYS FOR FIGHT.

  • @molaroismorais1758
    @molaroismorais1758 4 роки тому +1

    Go America 💪💪...

  • @EDKguy
    @EDKguy 4 роки тому +1

    The tracker looks like a Pignose guitar amp

  • @mikeymikeFType
    @mikeymikeFType 4 роки тому +4

    Well the RAF knows the system works after the US mistakingly shot down one of our Tornado jets in Kuwait.

    • @anthonyhill3625
      @anthonyhill3625 3 роки тому

      The RAF should learn how to fly and follow an air control order

    • @mikeymikeFType
      @mikeymikeFType 3 роки тому

      @@anthonyhill3625 . I think you’ll find the woman officer was at fault

    • @mikeymikeFType
      @mikeymikeFType 3 роки тому

      @@anthonyhill3625 . Google it. The coroner’s report describes it as a ‘glaring failure upon the part of the Americans’. An independent missile battery not connected to the main network. Americans really do have a habit of burying the truth. Suck it up,you screwed up big time. Same when you destroyed a British warrior vehicle..with a big sod off identification flag on the top of it.

    • @anthonyhill3625
      @anthonyhill3625 3 роки тому

      @@mikeymikeFType and the british like to blame the Americans. I talked to people in the battery and I believe their side. It's was a bad situation and they had to make a hard choice. Both sides had fault though.

  • @stephensfarms7165
    @stephensfarms7165 4 роки тому +11

    Iran, better be careful if they mess with the United States. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸💫

    • @israelatutale163
      @israelatutale163 4 роки тому +1

      Ronald Stephens all that weapon for a human being 😢😢 these wold is weakened

    • @stephensfarms7165
      @stephensfarms7165 4 роки тому

      Amen. They will be destroyed, like that want to do to Israel 🇮🇱

    • @GIVI727
      @GIVI727 4 роки тому +2

      you should be the one to be careful messing with iran there would be a hundred of thousands death if the war start to breaksout. And thats the reasons american CANNOT FIGHT HIS OWN WAR ALONE.. he needs his allies to fight in the frontline and he will just hit his enemy at the back. Just like in iraq war LOLS! 😂

    • @valensaisrep854
      @valensaisrep854 4 роки тому

      These patriot missiles couldn't stop a bunch of drones. good luck on destroying Iran lool

    • @szahmad2416
      @szahmad2416 4 роки тому

      Great! Just make sure to point them in the right direction, like you forgot to do at Aramco 🤣🤣🤣.

  • @thomasodonnell2187
    @thomasodonnell2187 4 роки тому +2

    I think it was cool to hear the Netherlands chose the MEADES upgrade. I am disappointed in US choosing only the missiles upgrade. I would choose the MEADES & missile upgrades at the same time. Double the potency of attack precision.😉.

    • @405boy4
      @405boy4 2 роки тому +2

      As an American also I agree. It's something about MEADS that makes me think it'll work better in a live combat situation than the Patriot Missile System..

    • @thomasodonnell2187
      @thomasodonnell2187 2 роки тому +2

      @@405boy4 indeed,brother, we recognize it's strategic value,😉💜.Thank You,💙.

  • @samright4661
    @samright4661 3 роки тому

    We know the Iron Dome works really well

  • @Tech-Inside
    @Tech-Inside 4 роки тому +4

    Patriot is the most advanced anti ballistic missile system even capable of destroying hypersonic glide missiles😅

    • @user-dg9ks7gd5h
      @user-dg9ks7gd5h 4 роки тому +1

      Are you dreaming? Impossible...

    • @henriettoalacrito2225
      @henriettoalacrito2225 4 роки тому

      It cannot even intercept low tech drones in saudi a piece of garbage and yet very expensive how unfortunate the american taxpayer to have this junk!

  • @JohnStark72
    @JohnStark72 4 роки тому +3

    That's "How Powerful ARE America's Patriot Missiles?"

  • @szahmad2416
    @szahmad2416 4 роки тому

    “Another important feature of the Patriot system: it has a giant speaker on it which can be accessed by an attacking enemy to warn the Patriot operators to go hide in bunkers because the incoming missiles are attacking from BEHIND the radar scanners, like at Aramco.” 🤣🤣🤣.

  • @orathaifreby2287
    @orathaifreby2287 4 роки тому +1

    American number one all the times dear Thanks again sir yes sir how are you today

  • @manisubhurajan4479
    @manisubhurajan4479 4 роки тому +5

    Ameican hero

  • @farrukhimtiaz3695
    @farrukhimtiaz3695 4 роки тому +4

    Where this power was gone in Afghanistan

    • @enocchicas
      @enocchicas 4 роки тому +1

      America kicked Afghani butt all the time

    • @deadliftalot
      @deadliftalot 4 роки тому

      @@enocchicas why don't they try with first world countries. Hmmmmmmm ?

    • @enocchicas
      @enocchicas 4 роки тому

      @@deadliftalot
      We are looking for an opportunity. Wanna volunteer?🤔

    • @deadliftalot
      @deadliftalot 4 роки тому

      @@enocchicas admitted USA only fights 3rd world counties because their military is scared

    • @enocchicas
      @enocchicas 4 роки тому

      @@deadliftalot scared of destroying you.

  • @chheamsothek1562
    @chheamsothek1562 3 роки тому

    Verygood

  • @PaulLe-jk4uq
    @PaulLe-jk4uq 2 місяці тому

    In Persian Gulf’s war, Patriot II was a bismal 70% effective. But since then, after several upgrades, PATRIOTS HAS BEEN THE BEST THE MISSILES SYSTEM TO GO FOR AIRDEFENSE!!! 👍🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸😀

  • @wernerzikeli7606
    @wernerzikeli7606 3 роки тому +4

    The Patriot has some handicaps what was easy to see at the use against the Houthis old Scud rockets and in the Irak war. Turkey, a NATO ally has decided for the S-400. The US was upset but it was reasonable due to the minor qualification. Even the US are testing the Israeli "David Sling" as a close protection system.

    • @mechatronics8279
      @mechatronics8279 Рік тому

      Yea its not that good of "system" more about $ a pop

  • @HienPham-zc7pk
    @HienPham-zc7pk 4 роки тому +4

    God bless USA
    Thank you

  • @k9fgdg
    @k9fgdg 2 роки тому +1

    70 tech trying to look updated is not going to stop supersonic/hypersonic missiles or swarms. this channel should be called the Military complex cheerleading channel. Want to really improve our defenses, make the exces of these corps go to the front line next time their systems are TRUELY tested and watch the systems evolve into amazing items.

  • @hrvojemikulcic7074
    @hrvojemikulcic7074 4 роки тому

    Why doesnt use AIM 54 Phoenix for Patriot MIM 104 systems?

    • @hrvojemikulcic7074
      @hrvojemikulcic7074 4 роки тому

      @Fred Cink Ok,plane and system is different between MIM 104 Patriot and AIM 54 Phoenix.

  • @rafaell.atlanticforest603
    @rafaell.atlanticforest603 4 роки тому +3

    Iran smiling now

    • @aneeshloser7227
      @aneeshloser7227 4 роки тому

      Rafael Longen Iran hiding now.

    • @aneeshloser7227
      @aneeshloser7227 4 роки тому

      That smile must go on even after the missile hits it's ass...

    • @analiesecosmetics2094
      @analiesecosmetics2094 4 роки тому

      Y Patriots couldent defending against Iran Missiles attacks to USA Ein-Alasad bases in Iraq?

    • @mervgocrazy19
      @mervgocrazy19 3 роки тому

      Analiese Cosmetics there was no system in Iraq. Trust me they sent us right after.

  • @JewelzFinazzo
    @JewelzFinazzo 3 роки тому +3

    I heard a rumour the US military will be switching to the Iron Some. We need to switch to something better because Russia, Turkey and Israel have way better surface to air defense systems than we do. I'm a Patriot System Operator and I approve this message.

  • @RealAlbo4life
    @RealAlbo4life 3 роки тому

    What is the name of the melody at the end??? Anyone please...

  • @MrZZooh
    @MrZZooh 3 роки тому +1

    The Houthis in Yemen have been known to fly drones into the Patriot's radars before launching missiles, effectively rendering it useless against ballistic missiles in some cases.

    • @405boy4
      @405boy4 2 роки тому

      The Patriot Missile system has had both some wins and losses in live combat. It's shot down a few rockets by the Houthis and some have gotten through. It's a tricky situation. The UAE used it also to shoot down Houthi drones, but some still came through. Israel feels like it's ok, but they still went and created David's Sling ( along with the US) because they think it'll work better if Iran tries to penetrate their defence system with their ballistic missiles that they have. Kinda hard to tell tho .

  • @peekudang2650
    @peekudang2650 4 роки тому +10

    We saw it in oil refinery of Saudis.. how strong is this unpatriot missile system.😆

    • @colejones594
      @colejones594 4 роки тому +2

      Arif Jah you do know the patriot system was made to shot down aircraft originally not even a thought to missile defense and it can do that pretty well and later it was upgraded for missile defense when it became critical it can intercept missiles but not very well you can upgrade it but if the system itself isnt designed around missile defense it wont preform its best also i do have to say direct kill missile for missile defense is stupid proximity explosion with HE fragmentation warhead would work better for missile defense

    • @peekudang2650
      @peekudang2650 3 роки тому

      @@colejones594 yea bro Jones u r right.

  • @blackfox4567
    @blackfox4567 4 роки тому +4

    S.400 number one for now

    • @gerard5697
      @gerard5697 4 роки тому +1

      1 out 4 barely come out of the tube. The ones displayed for China.. 1 of three did not detonate when they hit their target. Those odds are horrible

  • @larrymcintyre5693
    @larrymcintyre5693 2 роки тому

    They need the Iron Dome system

  • @gustavodiaz4689
    @gustavodiaz4689 4 роки тому +1

    Unfortunately we still lagging behind the soviets S400. I did read that we are going to be merging the patriot with the iron done from the israelí to make the system more potent.

  • @melindabendle6459
    @melindabendle6459 4 роки тому +6

    UNITED STATE'S MARINE'S, MILITARY, AIR FORCE'S..GOD BLESS ALL FOR SAVING THE PLANET EARTH..🌎🌏🌍🍀🇺🇸😇🌹

    • @markgomez1429
      @markgomez1429 4 роки тому

      Melinda Bendle Army has Patriot missiles too I’m a 14 tango , Patriot Launcher Enhanced Operator and Maintainer ,

  • @djoys7738
    @djoys7738 4 роки тому +3

    Why this system is failing repeatedly.. latest Saudi ?

  • @rolfstamenov9914
    @rolfstamenov9914 4 роки тому

    A majority of the launch film is shot in New Mexico at McGregor and White Sands

  • @ClericChris
    @ClericChris 2 роки тому

    7:04 Something kind of hot watching the woman do hand signals. What's the palms down pump down signal mean?

  • @scottwins2
    @scottwins2 4 роки тому +144

    Where were our missiles when Iran attacked?!!!

    • @michaelmartin436
      @michaelmartin436 4 роки тому +32

      We have never had PATRIOT missiles in Iraq.

    • @pipingyourmama
      @pipingyourmama 4 роки тому +11

      They haven't been in Iraq since we invaded

    • @michaelmartin436
      @michaelmartin436 4 роки тому +6

      @@pipingyourmama They were never in Iraq before we invaded either. That one experiment to see if they could keep up with frontline troops was a failure, and will not be repeated.

    • @pipingyourmama
      @pipingyourmama 4 роки тому +6

      @@michaelmartin436 I think Kuwait is the closest they've been. I know they are in SA now.

    • @michaelmartin436
      @michaelmartin436 4 роки тому +9

      @@pipingyourmama Saudi Arabia bought their own launchers, the US is not there. And the only ones left in Kuwait are in one location. The rest the US has are in Qatar, Bahrain, and UAE. None of which could have done a thing when Iran attacked.

  • @daniele.solorzano9515
    @daniele.solorzano9515 4 роки тому +12

    United States is awesome! 😍

  • @kamalahmedkhan5568
    @kamalahmedkhan5568 4 роки тому

    Good

  • @josephjuma9333
    @josephjuma9333 4 роки тому +2

    For me I love South Sudan it's my home land.. oh yeah patriot is a bit good

  • @armeniayerevan756
    @armeniayerevan756 4 роки тому +19

    💪🏼USA🇺🇸🇺🇸USA💪🏼

    • @jojothepolyglot1866
      @jojothepolyglot1866 4 роки тому

      IRAQ BASES!IRAQ BASES!...2 OF THEM AT THAT!OH !AND ARAMCO SAUDI ARABIA! ARAMCO SAUDI ARABIA!...FARGOT!!!!

  • @DavidFMayerPhD
    @DavidFMayerPhD 3 роки тому +4

    It was ineffective (to put it mildly) until USA sold it to Israel, who fixed it and sent back the details of the alterations.

  • @spacedas915
    @spacedas915 3 роки тому +1

    Greetings from India. 🇮🇳🇺🇸🚀

  • @iziahcarthens727
    @iziahcarthens727 4 роки тому +1

    When Patriot could not get it done, just remember the HIMARS or MLRSA1 can. The MLRS stood out in the first Gulf War where Patriot failed. The MLRS/HIMARS is still leading the way.

    • @iziahcarthens727
      @iziahcarthens727 4 роки тому

      @Fred Cink I am talking about performing and not type of missile system. No need for insults. HIMARS/MLRS is a more reliable system based on history. I know I was there for some of it.

    • @iziahcarthens727
      @iziahcarthens727 2 роки тому

      @CreedMVP It took them a minute to get it right-several times they wanted to moth ball the Patriot System

  • @user-on6ry6by7o
    @user-on6ry6by7o 4 роки тому +5

    USA💕💖💞 💪💪💪🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀👌👌💕💕💞💖👍👍👍💖💕💞

  • @Billy_Almighty
    @Billy_Almighty 4 роки тому +27

    Powerful enough to let those drone attack saudis oil refinery.😂😂😂😂

    • @sothealy3440
      @sothealy3440 4 роки тому +1

      That's the Washington's intention to bring war on Iran!

    • @carlpetterbladerhilding5124
      @carlpetterbladerhilding5124 4 роки тому

      The have stoled the GPS packet last time seen in sweden around 18 dont know exaktly date

    • @granbyadams8179
      @granbyadams8179 4 роки тому

      right on. it seems to be defective

  • @Inquire98
    @Inquire98 3 роки тому +1

    I believe feel KNOW think and trust this missile should have a speed of Mach 4 and a minimum range of 100 miles

  • @bobsnyder3309
    @bobsnyder3309 4 роки тому

    The picture at 4:35 looks more like the old SA-3

    • @Bizzon666
      @Bizzon666 3 роки тому

      It IS S-125 Neva/Pechora

  • @pravinmikelarry5561
    @pravinmikelarry5561 4 роки тому +3

    ITS CAPABILITIES WAS SEEN IN SAUDI. ITS AN JOKE. NOTHING LIKE S400 AND S500

    • @carlpetterbladerhilding5124
      @carlpetterbladerhilding5124 4 роки тому

      Kina

    • @fereydoonbesharati7945
      @fereydoonbesharati7945 4 роки тому

      Thank you parvin.

    • @totsky06bartolomejr14
      @totsky06bartolomejr14 4 роки тому

      Your s400 s500 never down f22 f35😂😂😂✌✌

    • @talasattila6401
      @talasattila6401 4 роки тому +1

      @@totsky06bartolomejr14 Actualy it's capable of downing both. Which is why US is not eager to let Turkey have F35's for target practice :)

    • @pravinmikelarry5561
      @pravinmikelarry5561 4 роки тому

      jr made in china,not to buy. Your patriot did even work at Saudi. 1bil worth of garbage.😅😅 fly in the F35 & F22 into Turkey and see ,if the s400 capable to whoop the worthless billions dollars garbage.