Supreme Court upends Chevron decision and makes it harder to charge Capitol rioters and Trump

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 лип 2024
  • (28 Jun 2024)
    RESTRICTION SUMMARY:
    ASSOCIATED PRESS
    Washington, DC - 28 June 2024
    1. Exterior of the US Supreme Court
    ASSOCIATED PRESS
    Archive: South Portland, Maine - 27 July 2018
    2. STILL - The Ruth & Pat, a herring seine boat, motors out of the fog off the coast of South Portland, Maine.
    ASSOCIATED PRESS
    Washington - 28 June 2024
    3. SOUNDBITE (English) Mark Sherman, The Associated Press: ++COVERED++
    "In a major victory for conservative and business interests, the Supreme Court overruled a 40-year-old case that had made it easier to sustain governmental regulations on the environment, consumer protection, public safety, public health, and workplace safety."
    ASSOCIATED PRESS
    Washington, DC- 28 June 2024
    4. SOUNDBITE (English) Mark Sherman, The Associated Press: ++PARTIALLY COVERED+
    "The decision, today got rid of a case known as Chevron, which basically says that when federal laws are not crystal clear, judges should defer to the experts who work at federal agencies when trying to discern whether the regulations that they've imposed comply with federal law."
    ASSOCIATED PRESS
    Archive:, Maine - 17 January 2012
    5. STILL - Gulls follow a commercial fishing boat as crewmen haul in their catch in the Gulf of Maine.
    POOL
    Archive: Washington, DC - 7 October 2022
    6. U.S. Supreme Court justices posing for group photo
    ASSOCIATED PRESS
    Washington, DC - 28 June 2024
    7. SOUNDBITE (English) Mark Sherman, The Associated Press: ++PARTIALLY COVERED+
    "The Supreme Court, in a decision in which the six conservative justices joined, said that judges have more of a role to play than the Chevron decision said. That judges shouldn't defer to agency experts when statutes are unclear; that's the work of judges."
    ASSOCIATED PRESS
    Archive: Washington, DC - 6 January 2021
    8. STILL - Rioters loyal to President Donald Trump gather on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol in Washington
    9. STILL - Supporters of President Donald Trump are confronted by U.S. Capitol Police officers outside the Senate Chamber
    10. STILL - Then President Donald Trump arrives to speak at a rally in Washington
    ASSOCIATED PRESS
    Washington, DC - 28 June 2024
    11. SOUNDBITE (English) Mark Sherman, The Associated Press: PARTIALLY COVERED++
    "The Supreme Court has made it harder for federal prosecutors to use an obstruction charge that is faced by hundreds of people who participated in the January 6th, 2021, attack on the Capitol and also is faced by former President Donald Trump."
    ASSOCIATED PRESS
    Archive: Washington, DC - 6 January 2021
    12. STILL - Trump supporters participate in a rally protesting the Elector College certification of Joe Biden's win in the 2020 presidential race
    13. STILL - Then-President Donald Trump speaks during a rally protesting the Elector College certification of Joe Biden's win in the 2020 presidential race
    ASSOCIATED PRESS
    Washington, DC - 28 June 2024
    14. SOUNDBITE (English) Mark Sherman, The Associated Press: ++COVERED++
    "It's not clear how broadly the decision will affect the January 6th cases, or whether President Trump's, charges will be affected. Special counsel Jack Smith, who has brought the charges against Trump in Washington, D.C., has said that no matter how the court ruled, Trump's case would proceed and the charges wouldn't be affected."
    STORYLINE:
    The Supreme Court on Friday upended a 40-year-old decision that made it easier for the federal government to regulate the environment, public health, workplace safety and consumer protections, delivering a far-reaching and potentially lucrative victory to business interests.
    Find out more about AP Archive: www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork
    Twitter: / ap_archive
    Facebook: / aparchives ​​
    Instagram: / apnews
    You can license this story through AP Archive: www.aparchive.com/metadata/you...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 9

  • @LeChairman
    @LeChairman 4 дні тому +1

    POWER TO THE CORPOS!!!

  • @thosk65
    @thosk65 8 днів тому +5

    POWER TO THE PEOPLE!!!

  • @annettechitwood9363
    @annettechitwood9363 3 дні тому

  • @d04me
    @d04me 8 днів тому +2

    What about charging those who were complicit in making it happen - Pelosi and Ray Epps handlers.

    • @TeresaMustaffa
      @TeresaMustaffa День тому

      Complicit and making what happens? It's been a fact Nancy Pelosi has no control over ordering national guard. The Jan. 6 Committee found no evidence to support the claim that he had offered Pelosi troops, but did find that he had discussed using 10,000 national guardsmen to protect his supporters.