Simple and straight to the point comparison. Well done! Question, how does one improve the quality of grass in a video streamed with H265 via OBS? Streaming at 30k bitrate + h265 = everything in the image looks good, minus the grass, which is always super blurry and pixelated. Cheers
This is late but- While yes it is, you need the hardware to even be able to encode AV1 (4000 series nvidia cards), and then every editing software I know of does not natively support importing AV1. So HEVC is obviously the middle ground as it can encode on more cards and can be used on most editing software, I know premiere can import it at least.
the only problem i have when recording Videos with AV1 Codec: it doesn't create Thumbnails. They have just that VLC Symbol. When i record it in NVENC the thumbnails are there.
Hello, how are you? I have a question. So, you recorded everything with Nvidia Shadowplay, but my question is, did you export each video in a different format
hey man i really need your help to figure this out , i have 4060ti with r7 5700g processor whenver i try to record my game till max resolution my screen flickers can u please tell me the encoder and bitrate configuration please...
The best way to export a video is to export it in h264 with high biterate, No point in using av1 because it's simply impossible it would take you days to export your video and you could have exactly the same as you were by increasing the bitrate with the h264 or use h265 if i'ts possible to better quality ❤😁
Upscaling to 1440p or if your channel is monetized then UA-cam will allow vp9 for 1080p. Otherwise you literally have to upload to UA-cam at 1440p for vp9 it’s really dumb.
The compression seems to have been done by the GPU and not by the CPU, you should use some Staxrip type encoder in slow or superslow to obtain the best quality with those bitrates. It is just a tip. Maybe there you can see the real difference in the compression capabilities of each format.
Can you make a video that talks about the difference between hardware encoding and software encoding? From what I understand other UA-camrs to say, is that hardware encoding is much better at high biterates and tends to not looks as good at say, 15-20 mbps or less. Whereas software encoding is the opposite, and is better suited for lower bitrates getting a more accurate image. Software encoding isn't necessarily bad at higher bitrates, but is just far less effective in terms of export times compared to hardware encoding. Could you do some tests to see how true this is?
es prioridad codificar por hardware, codificar por software solo si su hardware no lo soporta la ventaja por hardware es menor tiempo, menor uso de recursos, eficiencia energética la calidad del video depende de los ajustes establecidos, no va relacionado a lo anterior
Well, the difference is simple: youtubers say that hardware encoding is better because in most cases they show the best setup for streaming + playing a game at the same time. Hardware Encoder tend to be much less demanding. However, if you want to achieve the best visual quality, the software encoders will be better at every nitrate (given that you use one of the slower presets).
@@ALEDAMASy como elijo hardware en capcut, tengo un 12700kf y tuve q cancelar porque tardaba mucho y el cpu solo estaba trabajando llego has 96 grados
In the case of Among Us, AV1 has poor reproducibility when expressing simple images. And since it only supports AV1's hardware acceleration, it looks even worse on mobile.
dum6azz explain to me why you use H264 fastest stream preset for comparison? Nobody uses that for recording and it's more ridiclous to use it for comparison
@@CodecsBenchmarked It's not. I know X264 like the back of my hand. I work with video daily. X264 doesn't put such a blocky pixel mess especially at 8 mb unless you fokk it up on purpose.
It is one of the best possible compressions to date but the encoding time is extremely long, the VVC h266 codec has about the same quality but it is faster I think
Hey! Looking for samples and used encode commands? Look here: mega.nz/folder/TMswDRgK#VX-vZ3B85RNE13Jb7RLCWw
This is really awesome, and professionally done and presented. Keep up the great work.
was looking for this exact video man great outstanding video
I really appreciate the work you've done!
Awesome test mate, gold to see!
Simple and straight to the point comparison. Well done! Question, how does one improve the quality of grass in a video streamed with H265 via OBS? Streaming at 30k bitrate + h265 = everything in the image looks good, minus the grass, which is always super blurry and pixelated. Cheers
I think you might need to try to use a lower speed preset. A lot of grass might be simply hard to compress well.
So, AV1 seems to be the way to go for recording and encoding while playing, right?
This is late but- While yes it is, you need the hardware to even be able to encode AV1 (4000 series nvidia cards), and then every editing software I know of does not natively support importing AV1. So HEVC is obviously the middle ground as it can encode on more cards and can be used on most editing software, I know premiere can import it at least.
the only problem i have when recording Videos with AV1 Codec: it doesn't create Thumbnails. They have just that VLC Symbol.
When i record it in NVENC the thumbnails are there.
Try installing this: apps.microsoft.com/store/detail/av1-video-extension/9MVZQVXJBQ9V?hl=en-us&gl=us
@@CodecsBenchmarked
thx, will try it out later.
Hello, how are you? I have a question. So, you recorded everything with Nvidia Shadowplay, but my question is, did you export each video in a different format
hey man i really need your help to figure this out , i have 4060ti with r7 5700g processor whenver i try to record my game till max resolution my screen flickers can u please tell me the encoder and bitrate configuration please...
Since you have a RTX graphics card, I would probably try the Nvidia App (ShadowPlay) instead.
hello bro
i should export the video using AV1 or H.264 for better quality ??
The best way to export a video is to export it in h264 with high biterate, No point in using av1 because it's simply impossible it would take you days to export your video and you could have exactly the same as you were by increasing the bitrate with the h264 or use h265 if i'ts possible to better quality ❤😁
Hello, how do you manage to upload your 1080p60 fps videos with vp9 codec
Upscaling to 1440p or if your channel is monetized then UA-cam will allow vp9 for 1080p. Otherwise you literally have to upload to UA-cam at 1440p for vp9 it’s really dumb.
The compression seems to have been done by the GPU and not by the CPU, you should use some Staxrip type encoder in slow or superslow to obtain the best quality with those bitrates. It is just a tip. Maybe there you can see the real difference in the compression capabilities of each format.
AV1 is of course better, but is this compressed at the same bitrate?
Look at the file sizes at the beginning of every sample. They will appear below the codec name.
please make a video showing us how to record and upload videos to youtube in the best quality
Can you make a video that talks about the difference between hardware encoding and software encoding? From what I understand other UA-camrs to say, is that hardware encoding is much better at high biterates and tends to not looks as good at say, 15-20 mbps or less. Whereas software encoding is the opposite, and is better suited for lower bitrates getting a more accurate image. Software encoding isn't necessarily bad at higher bitrates, but is just far less effective in terms of export times compared to hardware encoding.
Could you do some tests to see how true this is?
es prioridad codificar por hardware, codificar por software solo si su hardware no lo soporta
la ventaja por hardware es menor tiempo, menor uso de recursos, eficiencia energética
la calidad del video depende de los ajustes establecidos, no va relacionado a lo anterior
Well, the difference is simple: youtubers say that hardware encoding is better because in most cases they show the best setup for streaming + playing a game at the same time. Hardware Encoder tend to be much less demanding. However, if you want to achieve the best visual quality, the software encoders will be better at every nitrate (given that you use one of the slower presets).
@@ALEDAMASy como elijo hardware en capcut, tengo un 12700kf y tuve q cancelar porque tardaba mucho y el cpu solo estaba trabajando llego has 96 grados
@@stevensv4864 intel con letra F significa sin iGPU
@@ALEDAMAS estoy jodido entonces?
This was very helpful.
H.266 ?
thank you for a great video! AV1 is the king
I don't see the difference between Hevc and av1
I think you should go and get a eye check up soon.
In the case of Among Us, AV1 has poor reproducibility when expressing simple images.
And since it only supports AV1's hardware acceleration, it looks even worse on mobile.
@@ridwanahmed9135🤣😂💀
@@ridwanahmed9135av1 for the win 🦾🔥
dum6azz explain to me why you use H264 fastest stream preset for comparison? Nobody uses that for recording and it's more ridiclous to use it for comparison
VerySlow is actually the slowest preset for x264.
@@CodecsBenchmarked It's not. I know X264 like the back of my hand. I work with video daily. X264 doesn't put such a blocky pixel mess especially at 8 mb unless you fokk it up on purpose.
@ramanauskiene edita he is a mad lad.
@@flagshipbowtie 0:42 its because he using very low bitrate 1 mb instead 8 mb for show difference on quality
Even VP9 or H.265 are good anough, but not supported by Microsoft RDP.
great work👌
Hi. AV1 is better....?
It is one of the best possible compressions to date but the encoding time is extremely long, the VVC h266 codec has about the same quality but it is faster I think
Nicely done
Thanks man👋😁
Ou seja, av1 venceu, hevc ficou em segundo e 264 em último.
Great job
This was such and easy comparison
underrated
thanks i try hevec
34