Join us on Patreon! www.patreon.com/ManufacturingIntellect Donate Crypto! commerce.coinbase.com/checkout/868d67d2-1628-44a8-b8dc-8f9616d62259 Share this video!
Just started watching Sidney Lumet’s movies. What a legend, hard to see people like him being forgotten. 12 Angry men is brilliant and Dog day afternoon seems Amazing already.
As a young person who is passionate about storytelling/filmmaking and trying to make short films, it is a great privilege to study Mr. Lumet's films. He is a true gentleman. An intellectual, creative and compassionate person who speaks with great insight about his craft, his life and the artists he worked with. R.I.P for the legend! What a great artist to look up to, I love you Mr. Lumet 💌
Lumet was a master at trusting his instincts, but that also came from the amazing lab of the 1950s NY scene that produced so much amazing talent ranging from Brando, Dean, Newman, Steiger, Frankenheimer and of course Lumet. Playhouse 90 alone pushed these guys to the edge of creativity. That environment doesn't exist today in the same way but I believe there is hope as we will sooner or later get over the computer stuff and start demanding the human experience again and great directors will start shaping.
The greatest director ever! The best New York director who ever walked. He has been gone 9 years now and is so missed! 12 Angry Men is one of my favorite films. It amaze me every time I see it. The direction. The actors! All of them terrific from beginning to end! What a movie that is!!! He made the film A View From A Bridge in 1962. I saw it once and so hope that it is put on DVD someday! It is the only play Arthur Miller wrote that I like. His version of Murder On The Orient Express is the best version made. I don't care what anyone says. Serpico! Dog Day Afternoon! No director uses New York the way he has done. Yeah, I know Woody Allen and Martin Scorsese film in New York, but they are not Sidney Lumet! Mr. Lumet Thank You So Much For All the Films You Left Behind!!
Brilliant. Really brilliant. One of best interviews I’ve seen. Such an underrated director. I love the part when Rose asks him “Coppola hasn’t made a good film for a while” The answer mmmm mmm. It was almost like Lumet was thinking what I’m getting in to here.
He mentioned liking Hoop Dreams. I love, love, love how Hoop Dreams is shot and the look of it. It's looks a bit like an actual dream; impressionistic.
I don't necessarily agree with Tarantino on his "only 10 films" personal philosophy, but as he's stated there is some truth to older directors succumbing to decline. Not doing their best work towards the end. However, when I finally came across Before The Devil Knows You're Dead a few years ago, I was incredibly impressed and was wondering why I hadn't been turned on to this movie sooner. Lumet was definitely one of the few who kept to a creative vision and ended his career with a unique and authentic film. Also showcasing some incredible performances and particularly memorable ones from Philip Seymour Hoffman & Albert Finney.
It's interesting that Sidney blames television for the decline in cinematic tastes. Only a few years after the interview, The Sopranos became a smash hit and the new TV universe was created. Now the best dramas are made for TV, and as has been said before here, popular cinema has become filled with vacuous blockbusters.
He was one of the great directors who never won an Oscar. Others include: Hitchcock, Kubrick, Frankenheimer, Arthur Penn, Stanley Kramer, Irving Kershner, and Alan Parker. Parker may have a chance - he's still alive. Today's movies are mostly sequels and remakes loaded with CGIs and rapid editing. Hollywood cannot tell a good story anymore so they try to compensate with overblown special effects.
yeah, a nostradamus that was 20 years late to the party. watch "a face in the crowd" or "will success spoil rock hunter" (both 1957). THEY were prophetic, and they weren't corny, ham fisted bullshit like "network".
@@andybaldman The better question is, what isn't it ham fisted about ? From beginning to end, the film is just a showcase of actors stomping and screaming about how they all deceive us all, America is owned by corporations, etc. I don't necessarily disagree with Network's message, the problem is the delivery is as subtle as a sledgehammer going through a plate glass window. Chafesky's script is so humorless and blunt, you get worn out practically at the beginning of the film. You don't need to watch the movie after after the famous "I'm Mad as Hell" monologue. Face in The Crowd, more or less, went after the same target almost twenty years earlier and it was a far better movie.
@@ricardocantoral7672 Who says the message needs to be delivered subtly? Sometimes a hammer through a plate glass window is what you need to get people's attention. You also need the rest of the movie, to give context to Howard Beale's multiple 'rant' scenes (of which the 'I'm mad as hell' one is just one). Without that, those scenes (which are key to the film) would make no sense. You'd think he was just another crazy person. Also, why does it need humor? It isn't a comedy. It's an intense film, and I think that was the point, because the message is important. And maybe if more people had listened back then, we wouldn't be living in the corporate dystopian hell that we have today.
@@andybaldman The message wears thin when it's being delivered bluntly over and over again throughout the film. That really just shows a lack of creativity Secondly, I think you failed to pick up on the fact that Network is a satire and tries to be humorous at times and fails a lot. The film isn't a film, it's just a filmed stage play with Paddy Chayfesky screaming at the top of his lungs via talented actors that deliver one hammy monologue after another.
Obviously an amazing interview. Not the main point for sure, but the discussion around 6:30 really struck me as a 2024 viewer. It seems every single generation we bemoan the fact that we are no longer producing great artists and intellectuals, when that is clearly untrue. If you think of all of the transformative works of fiction, film and art that have been produced since 1995, not to mention the intellectual/technological developments, you realize how silly this type of talk is. And yet we still do this today. We sit around and complain that something special about creation and insight that we once possessed has been lost to modernity, not realizing that the greatest works of human creation continue to be done and out done each and every year.
He seems to be saying that television has or is destroying cinema. He’s wrong. They actually enhance each other based on the quality of television over the last 30 years which is actually excellent.
Join us on Patreon! www.patreon.com/ManufacturingIntellect
Donate Crypto! commerce.coinbase.com/checkout/868d67d2-1628-44a8-b8dc-8f9616d62259
Share this video!
If you're studying film or writing this is a must watch interview.
more than that, you should buy and read the book. It's a revelation
outstanding director. Many generations will have to learn to appreciate his movies.
Michał Szeremeta they won't learn, it'll just come naturally
They'll never see them, because they'll be watching Pewdiepie, or whatever else the algorithm feeds them.
@@andybaldman yeah everything is bad these days, everything is no good, there's no reason to be jolly
@@QuinnUA-cam What does that mean?
Just started watching Sidney Lumet’s movies. What a legend, hard to see people like him being forgotten. 12 Angry men is brilliant and Dog day afternoon seems Amazing already.
"Network" which I saw today is freaking amazing. Don't miss it!!
watch 12 angry men as well!
IM MAD!!! AND IM NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE!!!
12 Angry Men is a film for our times..check it out
Never bought the hype. Network is just a series of overwrought monologues from beginning to end. The movie wears you out long before it ends.
@@ricardocantoral7672 what a dumb assessment lol
As a young person who is passionate about storytelling/filmmaking and trying to make short films, it is a great privilege to study Mr. Lumet's films. He is a true gentleman. An intellectual, creative and compassionate person who speaks with great insight about his craft, his life and the artists he worked with. R.I.P for the legend! What a great artist to look up to, I love you Mr. Lumet 💌
He was an icon in cinema, and a man who can change filmmaking with attitude
Lumet was a master at trusting his instincts, but that also came from the amazing lab of the 1950s NY scene that produced so much amazing talent ranging from Brando, Dean, Newman, Steiger, Frankenheimer and of course Lumet. Playhouse 90 alone pushed these guys to the edge of creativity. That environment doesn't exist today in the same way but I believe there is hope as we will sooner or later get over the computer stuff and start demanding the human experience again and great directors will start shaping.
I love CGI btw
The greatest director ever! The best New York director who ever walked. He has been gone 9 years now and is so missed! 12 Angry Men is one of my favorite films. It amaze me every time I see it. The direction. The actors! All of them terrific from beginning to end! What a movie that is!!! He made the film A View From A Bridge in 1962. I saw it once and so hope that it is put on DVD someday! It is the only play Arthur Miller wrote that I like. His version of Murder On The Orient Express is the best version made. I don't care what anyone says. Serpico! Dog Day Afternoon! No director uses New York the way he has done. Yeah, I know Woody Allen and Martin Scorsese film in New York, but they are not Sidney Lumet! Mr. Lumet Thank You So Much For All the Films You Left Behind!!
Marty is better
@@LYCANCLANTEAM I don't understand your comment about Marty.
@@voicegirl555 u said he is the best new yorkan director which is subjective. I merely said scorsese is better
@@LYCANCLANTEAM Oh! Well I like Scorsese too, but too me Sidney Lumet is the King when it comes to using NEW YORK on film.
I am sure that a lot of people agree with you and a lot agree with me. They are both wonderful directors of New York filming.
Brilliant. Really brilliant. One of best interviews I’ve seen. Such an underrated director. I love the part when Rose asks him “Coppola hasn’t made a good film for a while” The answer mmmm mmm. It was almost like Lumet was thinking what I’m getting in to here.
What a charming man and wonderful director who made outstanding movies, "Running on Empty" being one of my favorites of his. Sidney "Lumiere". :)
My favorite filmmaker of all time. A supreme American artist!
He mentioned liking Hoop Dreams. I love, love, love how Hoop Dreams is shot and the look of it. It's looks a bit like an actual dream; impressionistic.
"Serpico" is a fantastic movie. Superb director !!
Norman Wexler screenplay. 👍
what a man, loved the book - the perfect no film school book
One of my all time favorite filmmakers.
Great stuff - love “The Verdict”
I loved this. Thankyou.
my top 5 of his movies:
5 Serpico
4 12 Angry Men
3 Network
2 Murder on the Orient Express
1 Dog Day Afternoon
he's one of the greats, for damn sure.
5, 4, 3 and 1 are all great movies, but he has done much better than 2. Also his last movie is amazing.
Just his talking about hotels in different cities, and their homogeny, goes to show you how ahead of the time he was.
Network n 12 Angry Men r my favorite.
12 angry men imao is the greatest film of all time
12 Angry Men was so good. Lumet is a great director
Grandissimo regista. Tra i più grandi della storia
Sidney Lumet was a great director. Some of my favorites of his 12 Angry Men, Long Days Journey Into Night, Sirpico, Dog Day Afernoon, and Network.
Paul Stone Imagine having those under your belt.
Serpico
Prince of the City was fantastic movie, also very underrated.
he is so prolific. from 1957 to 1999. he makes 1 movie a year continuously. that is insane.
Never directed a bad movie. This man should have won several Best Director awards.
Orient express is a masterpiece of direction and acting
I don't necessarily agree with Tarantino on his "only 10 films" personal philosophy, but as he's stated there is some truth to older directors succumbing to decline. Not doing their best work towards the end. However, when I finally came across Before The Devil Knows You're Dead a few years ago, I was incredibly impressed and was wondering why I hadn't been turned on to this movie sooner. Lumet was definitely one of the few who kept to a creative vision and ended his career with a unique and authentic film. Also showcasing some incredible performances and particularly memorable ones from Philip Seymour Hoffman & Albert Finney.
John Huston was a rare exception as well. He did some of his best work in the last 15 years of his life.
"The Pawnbroker" was phenomenal. Devastating.
Wow that story about exhaustion as it pertains to Dog Day Afternoon is wild and inspiring
I read this in1995. I rate it with "Adventures in the Screen Trade" and "The Kid Stays in the P{picture."
Taste is most certainly waning... Ahead of his time
You're a bafoon, you focus on the bad
I’m in the middle of his book “Making Movies”
How is it?
tjlaviolette oh it’s great
Excellent..thanks!
I've got the book for years, should finally read it, seems like a quick read anyway
The Hill is my favorite Lumet film.
1995-96 I was a wayward youth indicating my way through life.
Network is 1 of the best dramas ever produced
Such a great book
It's robbery that this man never won an Academy Award for any of his movies. Nominated many times, but never won. One of the best directors ever.
What happened to all the referenced footage? Copyright issues?
Probably, yes.
It's interesting that Sidney blames television for the decline in cinematic tastes. Only a few years after the interview, The Sopranos became a smash hit and the new TV universe was created. Now the best dramas are made for TV, and as has been said before here, popular cinema has become filled with vacuous blockbusters.
Charlie is nervous. He must be a big fan
le nombre de grands films dans sa filmographie est hallucinant!
He was one of the great directors who never won an Oscar. Others include: Hitchcock, Kubrick, Frankenheimer, Arthur Penn, Stanley Kramer, Irving Kershner, and Alan Parker. Parker may have a chance - he's still alive.
Today's movies are mostly sequels and remakes loaded with CGIs and rapid editing. Hollywood cannot tell a good story anymore so they try to compensate with overblown special effects.
Sobering perspective. Why entertainment today drives me to drink.
Hitchcock has never won an Oscar, really?! :o
Scorsese won and it was for one his worst films.
The oscar is just an industrial political statement which does not reflect accurately on the merits.
Master.
Sidney lumet "making movies" 🎥
somehow we went from this to jj abrams and zack snyder and riah johnson
Why is Sidney’s name misspelled?
I would work for Sidney, anytime ...no questions ...money? Don't matter 🎭🎰🎑
Wanna watch excellent movies?....if Lumet made it, watch it.
He is blaming TV for the deterioration of people taste... what if he saw what phones are doing now 😂😂😂😂😂
Hall Of Fame Director
Imagine 12 angry men being your first movie!!!!!!
Network is one of the most prophetic films ever made. Cheyefsky was Nostradamus.
yeah, a nostradamus that was 20 years late to the party. watch "a face in the crowd" or "will success spoil rock hunter" (both 1957). THEY were prophetic, and they weren't corny, ham fisted bullshit like "network".
@@plasticweapon What is ham-fisted about Network?
@@andybaldman The better question is, what isn't it ham fisted about ? From beginning to end, the film is just a showcase of actors stomping and screaming about how they all deceive us all, America is owned by corporations, etc. I don't necessarily disagree with Network's message, the problem is the delivery is as subtle as a sledgehammer going through a plate glass window. Chafesky's script is so humorless and blunt, you get worn out practically at the beginning of the film. You don't need to watch the movie after after the famous "I'm Mad as Hell" monologue. Face in The Crowd, more or less, went after the same target almost twenty years earlier and it was a far better movie.
@@ricardocantoral7672 Who says the message needs to be delivered subtly? Sometimes a hammer through a plate glass window is what you need to get people's attention. You also need the rest of the movie, to give context to Howard Beale's multiple 'rant' scenes (of which the 'I'm mad as hell' one is just one). Without that, those scenes (which are key to the film) would make no sense. You'd think he was just another crazy person.
Also, why does it need humor? It isn't a comedy. It's an intense film, and I think that was the point, because the message is important. And maybe if more people had listened back then, we wouldn't be living in the corporate dystopian hell that we have today.
@@andybaldman The message wears thin when it's being delivered bluntly over and over again throughout the film. That really just shows a lack of creativity Secondly, I think you failed to pick up on the fact that Network is a satire and tries to be humorous at times and fails a lot. The film isn't a film, it's just a filmed stage play with Paddy Chayfesky screaming at the top of his lungs via talented actors that deliver one hammy monologue after another.
8:00 every hotel is owned by the same people…homogeneity is going to destroy us
Obviously an amazing interview. Not the main point for sure, but the discussion around 6:30 really struck me as a 2024 viewer. It seems every single generation we bemoan the fact that we are no longer producing great artists and intellectuals, when that is clearly untrue. If you think of all of the transformative works of fiction, film and art that have been produced since 1995, not to mention the intellectual/technological developments, you realize how silly this type of talk is. And yet we still do this today. We sit around and complain that something special about creation and insight that we once possessed has been lost to modernity, not realizing that the greatest works of human creation continue to be done and out done each and every year.
He seems to be saying that television has or is destroying cinema. He’s wrong. They actually enhance each other based on the quality of television over the last 30 years which is actually excellent.
"Actor's director"
Miss Charlie Rose
He sounds like Spielberg.. or is it the other way around?
Well, his movies were surely interesting ...
I recently saw Prince of The City and it was phenomenal. Sadly, it received none the acclaim Serpico did even though it's a superior film.
12 angry men, dog day afternoon, network, serpico, the verdict...and no competitive Oscar...can’t believe !
8:13 If he could only see how much worse it's gotten now.
Married like 4 times and attributes his success to luck. 😂
I wonder what he would think of the current culture and its Twitter hive-mind.
So interested in Sidney Lumet but I cannot listen to Charlie Rose. Never have liked him. Turned out I was right.
So devoid of ego
Rose, as usual, talks way too much.
The culture's been captured by Broads and Blacks.... FUGGHEDABOUDIT!
Disgraceful he did not receive a best director Oscar.
Politics
Is there anything more boring than a bad hamlet? great opinion!
I dislike the idea of driving actors to exhaustion and confusion. They are actors; direct them to act appropriately. That's your job.
Some parts of this is good but others is two old men being old men
Fool.
@@anthonyjona7779 Weird thing to call someone a fool for
@@nick_cornew nah.
Rose interrupts too much. Why doest he just interview himself?
Sidney Lumet is with an i masculine form and y is feminine.