"Jesus Debate Explodes: Joe Rogan’s Theory Meets Wesley Huff’s Facts!"
Вставка
- Опубліковано 5 лют 2025
- "Everyone is talking about this debate! Joe Rogan brings Wes Huff to discuss the Bible after the Billy Carson Debate. You have to watch this!
Wes Hoff delivers undeniable facts and nuclear truth bombs that leave Joe Rogan blown away. Don’t miss this explosive debate that’s taking the internet by storm!
👉 Subscribe now for more powerful debates, biblical insights, and truth-packed content! Hit the notification bell so you never miss an update!"**
#Bible #Debate #WesHoff #BillyCarson #Truth #Christianity #Faith #Apologetics #God #Hope #Today #Wow #Checkthisout #1min #Inspirational #Jesus #Heaven #Apologetics #sermon #scripture #instagram #christian #Comfort #Positive #Today #Christianity #Law #teachers #academia #evolutiondebunked #Evolution #mustwatch #classroom #praise #praisesongs #evolutionchallenge #creationism #genesis #creationstory
Credit: All rights belong to JRE. This clip is used for educational and commentary purposes under fair use. - Розваги
In answer to the question as to what if Jesus never died (He did), He was disfigured and seriously injured by flogging and had nails driven through His feet and hands so He would have been in no fit state to walk around teaching even if He had survived being crucified. Not to mention His heart was pierced by the soldier's spear!
Jesus was a very real Jewish rebel messiah. Like all the other very real Jewish rebel messiahs before and after him, he was killed by the Romans. Some died fighting them and some were executed by them. You and I agree there is no reason to question his existence or his death.
Does joe think that illiterate or ignorance means stupid?
Lol idk
@@anilkanda611 It wasn’t a direct question-more of an “I wonder.”
The Gospels are not written in the lifetime of the eyewitnesses who would supposedly have disputed it were it not to be true. That's another Huff falsehood. Mark names no eyewitnesses to seeing Jesus. Matthew is the next gospel and by the time that is written, between 70-80AD, Peter, James, Paul and all the disciples of Jesus would presumably have been dead. Furthermore neither Matthew nor Luke's gospels were written in Judea or even in the same country. So it would have taken many years for these accounts to circulate to the tiny number of people who supposedly saw Jesus.
But the gospels were written all within the lifetime of the people who were eyewitnesses to the Resurrected Messiah.
@@leenonolee4629 Who? All the people actually named, were certainly dead by 70-80 AD. Also Acts is thought by scholars to have been written in Rome (though you may not agree, some people don't). So certainly none of the witnesses would have been living in Rome.
@@ji8044what’s your evidence for all of the possible eyewitness to have been dead by that time? Youre also assuming that the synoptic gospels are written at that time but there’s good evidence to support them being written far earlier than that like Baukams argument about Luke acts
@@sporras32sp First of all there were no witnesses. Only Paul gives an eyewitness account. The rest is Paul and Luke saying other people they didn't know saw him. The best argument for the dating of the gospels as 65-70 or later is that Paul doesn't know anything about them or anything about the details of the life of Jesus contained in them. So if Luke is supposed to be the traveling companion of Paul how could it be that Luke a Gentile knows what Mary said privately to angel 70 years ago but Paul doesn't even know her name?
@@leenonolee4629 "But the gospels were written all within the lifetime of the people who were eyewitnesses to the Resurrected Messiah."
You have poor comprehension skills. Nowhere do the gospel authors claim to be eyewitnesses to the events they describe
I don't get it. The resurrection is faith. Either you believe it or you don't What is to argue about? And why does it matter what OTHER people believe?
It's also a historic claim. Faith is the deciding factor, but not the entire equation.
That's wrong! Jesus did not die on Friday. He was crucified on Wednesday. Then He rose on the last day which was a high Sabbath meaning Saturday. That's three days and three nights exactly.
The high sabbath was Wed. The weekly sabbath was Saturday. But I know you understand 3 full days 3 full nights, 3 days each 24 hours. Praise G0D for our resurrected L0RD.
He didn't die on Friday, that is a false Catholic convention. There were 2 sabbaths that week, a High Sabbath, and the regular Saturday sabbath.
The High Sabbath was on Thursday, which evening/morning would have begun Wednesday night.
So Wed. evening to Thurs. evening 1 day,
Thurs. evening to Fri. evening 1 day,
Fri. evening to Saturday evening 1 day = 3 days.
And he would have arisen between the end of Saturday evening and Sunday morning. He said the sign was the sign of Job, 3 days and 3 nights in the grave. Or the Jewish new day, Sunday (which as you recall started at Saturday evening). Thus he arose after dark on the 3rd day Saturday after night fall a full 3 nights and 3 days in the grave.
Huff's statement is in fact false. Paul and Luke say OTHER people, whom they did not know at the time, saw Jesus in the flesh. Paul is confusing about his experiences, but if you want to say he is the only eyewitness account; I will concede his personal encounter with Jesus. So there is only one eyewitness account of seeing Jesus after the Resurrection.
As a counter argument to that, we have epistles supposedly written by Peter and the brothers of Jesus in which they never mention seeing him in person after his death. You can't get much more conclusive than that.
Paul met with Peter and James, brother of Jesus, fairly early in his ministry. He repeats an early Christian creed of resurrection appearances, in First Corinthians. Read Gary Habermas' work on this creed. Even Christian critics recognize this as a creed quoted by Paul, not something Paul imagined up.
You guys have seriously flawed logic! It is true that if Jesus is god, he can rise from the dead. But it doesnt follow that if Jesus rose from the dead, that he is god. Imagine that I went around doing and preaching good and then after turing a stick into a snake (which is arguably more impressive that rising from the dead), I claim to be god. Would you believe me? I doubt you would and yet you believe Jesus was god. You need to develop your critical thinking skills!
You need to develop your understanding skills. I don't think I've ever heard a Christian claim that Jesus is God because he rose from the dead. Well, I guess a case could be made for that notion when Jesus states that He lays His life down and has the authority/power to pick it up again, but otherwise, we believe in the deity of Christ for numerous other reasons, for instance some names He called Himself like I Am/I Am He and how that would have been understood by a 1st century Jew, the confession of His disciples (particular Peter), the necessity of His being divine to be an acceptable substitutionary atonement, the list goes on and on. Do a little more research before making ignorant/false claims about our critical thinking skills. It makes you look stupid.
@@kenhicks8524 The Resurrection is the foundational principle of all Christian religions.
No one bases the Divinity of Jesus on the Resurrection. Jews believed that everyone would be resurrected, on the last day (except the Sadducees). They base the divinity of Christ on the theological claims made by Jesus, contained in early Christian accounts.
@ so what’s the evidence that Jesus was God? Surely you wont believe anyone who claims to be god?
Before Abraham i am . Forgived sin . I am the law of moses. I and my father are one and the same. Sounds lkke god to me@fatfrankie