Ukraine: What is Russia's Terminator vehicle?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 22 тра 2022
- Russia has deployed one of its most advanced armoured vehicles to Ukraine for the first time.
The Terminator is designed particularly for urban combat, comes with the protection of a main battle tank and is designed to destroy enemy bunkers and infantry positions.
Now, the Terminator 2 has been spotted in the Donbas, with its arrival seen as an attempt to bolster the Kremlin's forces for a final push to take Luhansk.
More: fal.cn/3oQfP
Subscribe to Forces News: bit.ly/1OraazC
Check out our website: forces.net
Facebook: / forcestv
Instagram: forcesnews...
Twitter: / forcesnews
"In a war not going well"...for Ukraine.
Prithee sir, how is this war going well for Russia
@@thearchives1094 I tried to refer you to some channels with alternative information that actually break it down very clearly and prove that Ukrainian forces are being dismantled but apparently this channel deleted my comment here . might delete this one as well . that's all you need to know about all this BS
@@thearchives1094 In recent weeks, Rus has captured many cities, the largest of which is Severodonetsk. You are welcome.
ukraine keep losing cities but claim to be winning only on media 👏
@@zanem9022 what in the hell are you watching? Are you not sure how to spell HIMARS lol?
"It's a tank support vehicle. Experts believe Russia brought these forward to support their tanks" WOW! I would have never guessed that! We are so lucky to have those genius experts!
hahahaha
The best way to test a new weapon put it in actual combat
Americans did that back in the gulf War. Took the russians long enough to figure that out.
It's all lies,the expert don't know what he was saying
Genius also told us "war is not going well". I would have never guessed as I believe every word Russia Today says. 😃😂🤣
Это ликвидатор пехоты, которая может угрожать танкам противотанковыми средствами. Так и называется, боевая машина поддержки танков на поле боя или БМПТ.
"Small victory in a war that's not going well"? Are you serious? This was published 5 days ago. From that date up until now Russians have taken dozens of towns and are on the brink of taking Severodonetsk and Slavyansk and posibly Bakhut. What are you talking about "war that's not going well"?! Oh boy, famous British objectivity XD
Right ¡¡¡¡
But he didn't say for whom this war isn't going well
The war is indeed going well for Russia! Lmao
@@tomasknotek6107 Ukrainian offensive southeast of Harkiv was a gamechanger indeed. Without it, Putin would never order mobilization. He just couldn’t realize that this is basically maximum you can get from the number of troops you have on the ground. Ukraine had six rounds of mobilization and had around 800.000 people under arms. Yes, vast majority of them are of poor training and quality but they still outnumbered Russians 4:1 when every military rule says it has to be the opposite - attacker must have a numerical advantage in order to succeed. If Ukraine wants to win another victory it has to do it before December. Because in January Russia will stop fighting with both hands tied to her back and start using one.
El idioto just saying whatever is written. Germany was saying same thing 1945 in april.
This is going to be the most hunted unit for trophie reasons.
🤣👍
This will be just as easily blown up by the javelin as the t-72 as the 90 tank. If your newest tanks aren't safe these aren't either.
Ukrainians will set up 10 cameras to get every angle and have a press conference just like to do for every minor victory. Meanwhile the terminator will probably shred 100 Ukrainians before they manage to take it out. Who knows how good that thing actually is but it certainly can aim that gun quicker and at higher angles then a MBT. Those 30 MM cannons are absolutely disastrous if the Terminator sees you since there really is no cover besides a couple feet of dirt that will protect so anyone that thinks hiding in buildings is a good plan is going to have a bad time.
@@jimduffield7822 lmao whatever helps you sleep at night, commie
@@jimduffield7822 really baby diaper..like putin thought to won war in 2 days
These terminators look nice, I wonder how high their turret can fly…
Lol
Not higher than your gas prices, that's for sure
Probably not that high, they'd need to carry HE's inside the hull to really get some lift in the turret, and I don't think they carry a whole lot of large charges inside. Sure, they have the AT missiles, but they're carried in their launchers, and then there's the ammo for the cannons (and the grenade launchers that they forgot to mention), but all that is rather small charges compared to what you'd expect to find in a tank, so even with sympathetic detonation you're not going to get a whole lot of pressure.
Our gas prices are getting pretty high so thats not much of a limit. Luckily unlike russians people in the west can afford to pay it.
if all 4 rockets ignite they can go to the moon
BMPT-72 Terminator 2's were designed after Russian armoured columns took massive fire from elevated and multi-directional positions in the Battle of Grozny. If they are used in accordance with their tactical doctrines, they should do a lot to render plenty of defensive positions useless.
If not used properly, they'll be very very very vulnerable.
Built in reactive armour, smart defenses and a heck of a lot of range makes them pretty resilient.
Really? So impervious to artillery and drones ?
@@rolandthethompsongunner64 That's definitely one of the least intelligent replies that you could possibly have posted to my comment. Resilient is NOT a synonym for impervious.
@@theorncampbell4432 No doubt.
Reactive armour??? You mean rubber blocks or even egg cartons lol.
Well it looks like they were not used properly then... You can see when it drives the turret isn't even gimble stabilised.
it has more crew, more eyes, and autocannon to suppress atgm crews. basically its heavy ifv on tank chassis without dissmounts
🔴LIVE : Follow the latest videos from Ukraine War Frontlines on 👉Frontline Report
Finding a use for all the old T55 chasis.
Ukraine's ATGMS are remote controlled though. Still useless. haha
@@JinKazama92 yes from 50 meters distance
More crew= more drunks, autocannon- been around since WW2. This thing is just something else for Ukraine to destroy.
Long range artillery and drones still seem like the most valuable weapons for the current war phase.
Its the street fighting afterwards that this is about. Tanks do not really excel in urban areas which probably many people know. They don't shoot at upward angles well especially at close range. If anyone is above a tank on a 5th floor or something, I don't think a tank can even engage . Its better to have sustained fire power than a single HE.
artillery strikes from long distances are not effective
and infantry anti-tank weapons.
🔴LIVE : Follow the latest videos from Ukraine War Frontlines on 👉Frontline Report
But not in the jungles ,,u need some serious movements in countries like Brazil or the Congo
Javelin: "I smell prey."
A-10: 'I smell prey."
Abrams: "I smell prey."
Tractor: "I smell scrap metal."
What are they paying for scrap metal in Ukraine, these days?
@@TraderRobin not much I guess, the market is flooded lol
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!
When this war is over, the Ukrainians are going to have military spare parts for days.
The autoloader on most Russian MBT Tanks prevents the tank gun from engaging high elevation targets at close range . This makes a lot of sense both doctrine and equipment wise.
@Ruslan Masinjila but he is right, this thing makes sense
Blow with drone!
@@Ross72A only to a communist lol
@@lostvayne104 that makes no sense
@@lostvayne104 you fool woke😂😂😂😂😂
Considering that Russia is just about to complete securing control of the Donbas and they currently hold more territory than they originally stated in their objectives, Wiped most of Ukraines military infrastructure off the map and inflicted shocking casualties, It's a bit silly to say that they haven't accomplished much.
They have accomplished losing most of their mechanized equipment, thousands of drunk troops, all air support, and now in process of losing their artillery. Not to mention showing the whole world just what a weak and pathetic fighting force the Russian military really is. Now if you would like, you could run to the Ukrainian borders and maybe live to go home. But do not get into a vehicle, you will be targeted and eliminated.
Even after Odessa returns to Russia and Ukraine become landlocked you'll hear the Britain propaganda saying Ukraine destroyed Russia's military.
They originally settled for all of Ukraine, if u forgot. But after they got their ass wooped near Kyiv they focused on donbass and south
@@ihorkarpiuk4102 "They originally settle for all of Ukraine" doesn't even make sense. What are you talking about?
They stated their goals very clearly when they announced the operation.
How and why would Russia want to Annex a country that puts them on Poland's border?
This isn't the old Soviet Union's armed forces. Russia's armed forces aren't comprised of anything near the size required to pull of some huge operation that includes laying siege to Kiev while securing the Donbas. Why would they annex Western Ukraine, when it's pro-western and Anti-Eastern. You're assessment makes zero sense.
All of the value to Russia is located in the South East. It's also convenient that the pro-Russian population mostly lives in the South East.
Modern anti-tank missiles don’t care how badass your tank name is, they all go boom the same
Javelines nead up to 5 hits hmmmm 👽👍🏼
Its a vehicle highly optimised for anti infantry firepower.
It is desgined to surpress and kill agtm teams with overwhelming automatic cannon fire.
Honestly the Ukrainians need to be a quite careful engaging these things
@@studentaviator3756 I seriously doubt this tank can detect anything within Javelins range. ATGM is usually hidden and can't be seen unless it's been fired from a very close range which is very unlikely. I'm no military expert but from the looks of it, that turret can be disabled with a simple drone or an RPG shot.
Only 9 of them deployed? My prediction is 6 will be left smoking on the side of the road after missile hits, and 3 will be left behind by incompetent Russian crews to be repurposed by the Ukrainians
@@ProBroOfficial against a javilan i shouldnt think it has good odds.
Against stugna or an older gen agtm youd need to be careful.
Im not saying the Ukrainians wont beat it just you shouldnt duscount it.
Won’t be long before we see a video of a Ukrainian farmer driving a tractor pulling one across his fields
if is so good, why is so bad? Go Russia!!!
Hehehe or exhibit on tourist in khiv😂😂
Did the Brit said "to finally claim a small victory"?? lol What about kherson, Mariupol and the massive surrendering? what about the total eradication of Azov army? what about the 80% of Ukraines coastline now under full Russian control and the fact that they got their land bridge? lol This Brits military analysts are the best at sugar coating for Zelensky lol
Literally Ukrainian propaganda. It happened twice.
@@DingleDangle66 the ukrainians are using tractors to tow their own artilery now ahhah
*Usa invades* : Vietnam,Afganistan and Iraq
*Whole world* : Ok
*Russian Invades* : Ukraine
*Whole world* : YOU CANT DO THAT
Did Russia only invaded Ukraine?
@@tiagob7274 yes, it is. Any other options?
@@tiagob7274 read official Syria/Rus deal . We were in Syria legally. Nothing to say about usa. As usually ellegally.
@@MaksGubin1983 Georgia? Afghan?
@@tiagob7274 You have not accidentally forgotten that Russia sent troops to Georgia only after Georgia destroyed the base with Russian fighters who were there according to theaccording to the Treaty between Georgia, South Ossetia and Rossiny
"In the war that is not going well" - in the mean time Russia keeps gaining more territory.😆
I was going to say that ! UK dept of war (never having fought like this themselves) are keen to rubbish the Russians with fake news stuff. How will they explain the Russian win ??
Exactly
Gaining territory at what cost? I thought they were almost at the capital a month ago 😆
@@bigjimmy3792 what cost is it for Ukraine? 10s thousands Ukrainian soldiers dead 10s thousands civilians city’s leveled depleted military zelensky is a literal puppet of nato killing alot of his own men thinking he can win this war the clown of Kiev its worthless to fight
@@bigjimmy3792 Kiev was never on the list of demands. They probably hoped having troops outside it would have forced a settlement. Now it probably will end up on the list.
I reckon a cheap RPG would wreck the turret, especially at close range in an urban environment.
Maybe Brazil Uturu Armoured Vehicles Helps Ukraine Withstand from 24 Feb to 24May
It's not a tank... Close range and you'll be in heaven
This is an infantry killer, getting anywhere near it with an rpg is a death sentence, it's designed to protect regular tanks from infantry.
Nahh corn beef is talking
@@jessiex2590 it's is a tank, turret replaced with 30mm gun. So it will move slow like a tank, blowing up like a tank if hit by javelin.
Lots of weapons, limited ammunition capacity but more importantly this will explode just the same as a standard T72 as the ammo is in an unarmoured storage unit in the hull.
good point
propaganda can make low IQ and ill informed western vote bank happy...but in reality incompetent league of 30 nations spending 1.3 trillion dollars a year dare not confront Russia.
nop. It does not explode as T72. It does not have an autoloader for 125mm cannon.
@nlomas But doesn't this one use the same chassis as the T-14 Armata??
@@stephenbrand5661 Nop. It is based on T72. Armata T-15 is heavy IFV
The terminator also have GL systems in them as well as the mg, Auto c, and atms.
"Russia only has a handful of these"
You call 300+ inventory "just a handful".
Like oh ... look at me it's nothing... I can take 300+ with a tooth pick.
America has the running joke called the Bradley... The Terminator can take out Bradleys like it's nothing.
And that's why unlike Russia and the war tornregions around it, we don't really do ground battles. Land war is easily dominated by counters, until the counter doesn't take and everything becomes a counter to it
300+ is nothing too. Putins promised WW3 and claimed he will come out at the very top of the pyramid with China if he actually declared it, that 300 would be a single battles fill
Just as an armor professional, it's not an incompetent design (so long as they can maintain it) and fits a role generally filled by IFV's. But IFV's almost always do double duty as an APC, to the detriment of it's arsenal. This hunts for things that hunt tanks, whether foot mobile, motorized, or light mech.
Most targets in an armored units area of engagement are not MBT's. It's fortified positions, technicals, and other IFV's trying to do the same job, which are more numerous on the field than MBT's. 25-35 mike mike's and coax MG's get far more of a workout on a wider array of targets than a tank's gun.
Thx !
It’s missing active armor like a tank. Though Russian active armor is mostly cardboard because real active armor is expensive.
@@Alphasig336 Where do you get such "experts" from?
Its basis is a TANK - why did you get the idea that it does not have active armor?
@@YuriiTemnikov because at least as shown in this video it does not apear to be on the vehicle lol. Anyone with half a brain can tell the difference between a tank that has active armor on it and the one that does not. And these again, as shown in the video do not apear to be equiped with one.
@@YuriiTemnikov and no, spaced armor (a.k.a those side skirts on it) is not active armor
Russia: "We have a handful of the Terminators"
Ukraine: "Yes, Turkey, we'd like to order a handful of Bayraktar TB2 please."
Earlier russia showed they have developed 5th gen laser that can destroy drones 1500 miles away. They learned a lot from previous mistakes in karabaq. Now don't force them to utilize their full scale.
Pantsirs have brushed most TB2s away it seems. Of course these machines will have SAMs covering them.
@@teatime6597 Pantsir is light AA vehicle, they deffinitely won't go to fight alongside with Terminators.
@@K3mr0n Range is about 30-40 km depending on version so "alongside" is a matter of definition.
@@teatime6597 30-40 km is very subjective, they won't be able to detect such a small target like a Bayraktar even within 10 km.
And the prize for understatement goes to,...."A war that's not gone well".😂
Without active protection system to defeat incoming atgm missiles , terminator will be more a target than a real threat. javelin and NTGW will neatly work on these IFV.
If they do meet them. If they see them first, the Ukrainians will be red mist
I mean with proper infantry and drone support these can be very effective. it's now up to the Russians to use it competently lol
Russians competetly -nice joke :)
they said they have substantial active defenses. dunno if that's true but they said it in the report.
@@Shinbusan polack and the mind are incompatible
Its another rapid vertical lift flying tank.
Or the guys manning the Neptune missiles that took out the Moskva.
@@liamanderson4992 maybe if you can get all 10 in one shot, anti ship missiles are big and expensive, given the limited supply, I doubt they would target one of these, a reaper or phoenix might be more likely.
You know that!!!!
Reddit humour
@@ryanpiercy3390 What they have been using to take out the tanks will finish these things , even an RPG to the turret would probably be enough
As others have noted it is a camel - a horse designed by a committee.
The camel deserves more respect than this. It has more utility than a horse in a lot of situations.
Clarck's words
One of the successors of the german Schützenpanzerwagen “Drilling”.
Was wondering when we would see these deployed and how effective they would actually be.
They're getting desperate. Not that this will help them.
once they get blown to pieces ..well, there goes their foreign sales.
Hope the baby formula from Germany will help US 😂
From what I understand it’s just another good target for the Javelin
It appears to be softer than normal tanks. Anything like stugna, javelin, nlaw, drone bombs will be able to take it down. Maybe it won't have a VTOL turret, but it will smolder pretty well.
It's will achieve Special status very soon.....
Javenlin works bad on regular T-72 tank - there are reports Russian T-72 withstands 2-3 hits of Javelin. I don't see any reason why it will work better vs this machine.
Russian ATGM is also killing Ukraine terrorist 😆 Brave Russia will destroy terrorist Ukraine Nazi . Love from 🇮🇳 💞🇷🇺
And NLAW
Dude I just love that an NLAW can take out a T-90, thing has foam round the tube from the last thing I ordered on Amazon
1:02 “… they’re focused on an urban battle…”. Only if they’re allowed to get that far. High-altitude surveillance and precision missiles will destroy many, if not all.
Yes, with non-existent Ukrainian surveillance assets and non-existent Ukrainian precision missiles.
@@MrDomingo55
Dropped from the non-existent Ukranian air force.
These are even easier to blow up than their T-90's.
You know nothing
Keep playing call off duty ,dude 😂
Your mama call you to drink a hot chocolate milk and put pijama of banana
On December 1, 2021, the first in the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation BMPT company of nine combat vehicles was introduced into one of the tank regiments of the tank division of the Central Military District.
Guess that means something to you, just more targets to destroy for the Ukrainian military.
Su propósito es control de zonas urbanas. Puede ser más versátil, pero su punto fuerte es zona urbana.
This is a formidable vehicle but is really only effective in a very limited circumstance where modern anti-tank missiles aren't in use. Removal of the main gun auto-loader will eliminate the lovely turret flinging explosions but an anti tank missile is still going to render it combat ineffective. Even an M72 LAW will wipe the weapons off the top of it.
The Panzerfaust 3 bites trough a T72 hull easily, as Videos show.
UNLESS IT HAS APS SYSTEM
@@MrHenning3000 obviously an anti tank weapon will punch through a tank, that's what they are designed for
@@meisterproper8304 Not necessarily. Older AT weapons (AT-4, LAW, RPG-7 etc) are not always effective against modern tank armor. Modern variants like Javelin, NLAW, sure.
People talk as if every single Ukrainian squad was able to get their hands on ATGMs and know how to use them.
A tank support vehicle isn't the same thing as infantry support. Without foot infantry (or drone equivalent) to clear spaces of a possible ambush, tanks (and anything that acts as a tank) are at risk. Without tanks to back up infantry against fortified positions and opposition armor, the infantry's job is unnecessarily dangerous. If they don't send infantry in ahead of the tanks, all we're going o find out about the "Terminator" is how far the turret pops up when the ammo rack cooks off. If you want to see a future infantry substitute for recon, look up DARPA's OffSet Swarm AI.
One N-law would do the trick!!!!
Not hear because it doesn't have an autoloader
@@josephstalin9357 does it have separate armored compartments for the ammo is the question I wanna know the answer to.
@@mikelucas9916 I would guess it has a modified version of the T72s storage. Most of it is going to be linked or chained cannon/ heavy machine gun. It might not cook off. However, the turret doesn't appear to weigh near as much as the stock crewed turret. The overpressure from HE would most likely pop it off. I like the basic premise, very inventive and economical. The point was that it's just as vulnerable to small crew ambush tactics as any other tank. Armor, no matter what cool name you tag it with, needs advanced recon scouting. Armor and infantry, goes together like bread and butter.
@@Cmoth040 its just a modified T-72.they supposedly only have a few of them.we’ll be seeing them getting hit and blown up as soon as they use em in battle.
Tip for ATM gunner: when you take a Terminator out don't forget to say "Hasta la vista baby"
There is no such wonderful weapon that could operate on the battlefield separately and alone, especially among self-propelled armored vehicles ever created. A negative example is, despite the initial great success, of the super-warship Bismarck.
Only joint actions with other branches of the Armed Forces give a chance to succeed in combat. As a last positive example, the SS troops, despite their ideological disrepute (mostly from the side of the victims), these German combat units showed a good example of almost simultaneous coordinated actions with reconnaissance and diving aircraft, infantry, artillery and armored vehicles (remembering the Tiger), thus achieving good results.
And finally, the most important thing is that a person and people in a team, having the necessary morality and properly motivated, can successfully do what they have to do. These so-called new versions of the weaponry are just propaganda and another way for some commercial and political interests to line their pockets with more money.
Well said, It seemed Hitler was often hoping for the big weapon that would change the tide. Half of these weapons are just being showed off to the world to gain attention and make sales.
ukrainazis ss
@Сергей Захаров войска сс за 4 месяца прошли 1200 км, захватили Украину,Беларусь,зашли в москву и сталинград,взяли в плен больше 1.5млн коммунистов,уничтожив регулярную армию.Говоря о,, Галичине,,вы умышленно замалчиваете ,,подвиги,,генерала Краснова(донские казаки),Власова(РОА, более 100тысяч человек),крымских татар,чеченов и других,информация о которых легко гуглится.С чего бы это,если вы такой обьективный борец за справедливость и историческую правду?Расскажите о памятнике краснову,к которому возлагают цветы люди с белыми полицайскими повязками на руковах?
@Сергей Захаров Краснову вы памятник поставили,цветочки носите,и те кто носят героя россии из рук президента получили,и благодарственные грамоты.Что ты там говорил про знак равенства😊?А еще есть,,уникальная реликвия,,в храме минобороны,гранитная плита в храме всех святых(установленная в 2014году),предложение,,сына юриста,,сменить орлов над кремлем на то самое,ну и конечно человеколюбивая политика ,,в ядерный пепел,,
@Сергей Захаров есть интервью, участников одесского антимайдана(тех самых) спрашивают-вы знаете как живут лднр?Вы хотели бы жить также?Вы попытались бы создать онр снова?Люди(те самые) говорят,,Нет,,-УЧАСТНИКИ ради благополучия открестились от россии-матушки и своих друзей,.Обычные одеситы говорят ,,нет,,Это год так 19-20.Так что слово ,,Одесса,, греет сраки только россиянам.,все остальные хрен ложили.(а пара человек(тех самых)внезапно оказались в теробороне и воюет против рф-это даже ваши пропагандисты показывали-их запугали,они были скрытыми агентами сбу,нужно разбираться,русофобия...)
So they've used cannon to hit targets where 120mm would be more than needed, and they can therefore carry more rounds. Can't see it'll help much. David had a sling. Dimitry had a Javelin.
The first Terminator was called the BMPT Terminator I believe. This newest one is the BMPT`72`-Terminator 2. The 72 there indicating what chassis the hull is from. These are going to be interesting.
I think the 72 refers to how many pieces it will explode into when attacked by a civilian drone dropping a mortar shell onto it.
Did the Brit said "to finally claim a small victory"?? lol What about kherson, Mariupol and the massive surrendering? what about the total eradication of Azov army? what about the 80% of Ukraines coastline now underfull control of Russia and the fact that they got their land bridge? lol This Brits military analysts are the best at sugar coating for Zelensky lol
@@ibrahimmoncada7214 it took Russia 80 days to take Mariupol. That is humiliating for the Russians.
Kherson was lost, sure, but the goals were Donbas, Kharkiv, and Kyiv, and Russia lost the battles of Kyiv and Kharkiv.
@@AtlantiansGaming ..Took America 10 years to get their asses handed over to them by Vietnamese farmers :)
Trophy turrets will fly 🇺🇦😈
Ah yes, a target rich environment!
I wonder how old the T55 chasis they used on the BMPT is?
At one time, Nazi Germany had the best weapons, but neither the tiger, nor the Fauzpatron, nor the Fa-1 could help. Finally, in Berlin in 1945, the Russians raised the banner of victory over Germany.
I heard that javelins and nlaws love them. The arms on the turret look very vulnerable for a small hit. Maybe dropping some bombs from drones will be enough to disable the weapons.
I didn't thought about it.
Imagine just a near miss of a big enough bomb, those things will either break or jam in place. Either way a combat kill
@R A Infantry designed to ambush autocannon. Lol infantry don't sit out in the open.
Better to capture them and use them against Russians than destroy them.
Or use then as wooden horse of Troy; packed with explosives remote controlled .
N.L.A.W. should have a nickname like mother as in ,"mother-N.L.A.W."
You mean the ones gifted freely to the DNR, LPR, and Chechens? You do know that the Russians learn from their mistakes and is adapting new tactics, yes?
The next time you see these vehicles will be when they are being locked onto by a drone and end up receiving Special status ... !!!!
And then a tractor towing it away 🚜🚜🚜
I wonder how many washing machines the Chinese can make out of one of these ? Maybe Russia could cut out the middle man and send them direct to China
Question? What if brandly add 30mm automatic machine?
My question is what kind of visibility the crew has from the inside. This has the capability of engaging targets on the 3rd and higher floors inside cities. But that's moot if the crew can't see the threat. I'll trust a squad of troopers with the old mark 1 eyeball. On the other hand, if you can't get Russian infantry support, this is better than nothing.
But the drones given to Ukraine by Turkey will make fish on pan with them.
😃😃😃 given to Ukraine but Russia has plenty of them they don't depend on given things.
@@baloz8974 they don't have plenty of anything anymore.
@@scratchy996 how did you know? Did you go to russia? Did you check it?
@@memememes7525 probably Zelensky or CNN told him 😂
Mhmm
Tank museums worldwide will have to make just a little bit more space now.
More like a scrap metal yard in Ukraine lol.
For what, none of these will survive the war.
That VERY high turret looks like a juicy target for an RPG-7
I pray this nightmare ends soon as possible
God bless Ukraine soldier and citizens peace and too much respect and love for them.🙏.
That barrel looks shaky when firing compared to the M3 and such. Wouldn't be surprised if this thing is a maintenance nightmare
Then it shouldn‘t be any problem for the Russians, who seem to do little, if any, maintenance on their vehicles…
It seems everything they have is disposable.
Noticed very well. 👍
The recoil seems to set up wild harmonics, has to cause havoc with long term reliability (or even short term given the woeful Russian mfg.), accuracy has to be of the "spray and pray" variety... looks like another russian hype heavy machine like the T-14 and SU-57...
I think it will be more effective if they use the T72 chassis and just 6 guys sitting in the turret ring looking at 6 directions with AK with a sheet metal roof covered with sand bags, that way it’s immune to top attack and they crew can jump out really quick.
Forget all this, how far does the turret fly?
It’s like renamed like in the movie from The Terminator
If it's more useful than a main battle tank then it should probably be the thing you shoot first with your NLAW or Javelin.
@@lubart7836
The propaganda a dies hard with some. The drones, stingers and the ATGMs don't live up to the hype which is why the heavy weapons are being sent. The Russian air defense and jamming equipment neutralize the drones and ATGM don't do much against artillery. The tanks also keep their distance.
@@lubart7836 Apparently Not.
Armour like a T-70 = Will be destroyed by modern anti-armour?
Designed for urban warfare = yet clears building with it's 30mm gun from middle of main road?
Modern communications yet cannot communicate with troops following behind?
Did the Brit said "to finally claim a small victory"?? lol What about kherson, Mariupol and the massive surrendering? what about the total eradication of Azov army? what about the 80% of Ukraines coastline now under full Russian control and the fact that they got their land bridge? lol This Brits military analysts are the best at sugar coating for Zelensky lol
@@ibrahimmoncada7214..Yeah it only took them 3 months to wait out a small garrison in Mariupol. Taking Odessa may take a decade.
@@ibrahimmoncada7214 shut up you keep saying the same thing
@@tommygun5038 We will see, the Ukrainian Army is already collapsing in the Donbass with units refusing to fight.
@@kell7195...The Ukrainian army is not collapsing and has 5x the manpower in theater.
Even with this vehicle, they can't see in all directions at the same time. They still won't know what hit them. I think that this device is one that looks good on paper, but in actual service it will fall to the same fate as with the rest of the armored vehicles. Some Babushka with Molotov cocktail will be its undoing.
will it be flyable, like regular t72?
Does the turret travel a longer distance when this blows up from design flaws than their regular tank turrets?
We don't know, lets ask our good friend Brimstone lol
We'll be able to see the auto loading system, as soon as that turret gets popped out of there.
It doesn’t use a carousel auto loader I don’t think
Everyone gangsta in the comments til Russia sends a intercontinental ballistic missile.
@@jaypolas4136 That would be the end for Moscow.
The Turret looks vulnerable to attack from above…..
“Pop”!
And they go "boom!", just like their T90 whe a Javlin hits it. 😱
I don't know... Looks like some kid designed "The bestest and coolest tank ever. It has two guns that fire really fast AND rocket launchers".
Ask ISIS and Al Qaida what they think of it...If anyone is alive to tell.
@@teatime6597 Russia only has ten of them. Soooo, if they are so great, why don't they produce more?
@@FutureChaosTV You work at the russian MoD? Guess no one else knows how many there are.
@@teatime6597 Sorry. I forgot they were single handedly defeated by....The Terminator 😂
Russia can't even come up with a cool sounding name 😂
@@mathiasjonsson8222 were they? I'm not so sure.
All I can hear in my head from some Ukranian fighter is, "Hasta La Vista baby!"
Their weakens is the same as other tanks top down or the rear as Ralikt ERA give good protection. The torrent seems to also be a weak point.
the lack of an ammo carousel at least should make it more survivable .
Seems like the perfect thing for the switchblades to target.
I think it is just more NLAW and Javelin fodder. Look forward to videos seeing them trashed.
sure and zelensky and his men have lost only 8 men during this entire war and definitely not had entire battalion's trained by nato wiped out or surrender, oh wait "evacuated". It takes multiple hits to destroy the tank itself, ukrianian unedited videos show a lone tank with no support tanking 4 hits before the crew left their vehicle, all in the early days of the war. now that russia has decided to use air power and more supporting vehicles there are significantly less losses. if you decided to get you head out of the mud and stop beliving everything on CNN maybe you would respect what i just said and try and understand what i just said, but thats highly unlikely
@@speen9430 the level of copium in these Zelenskyy supporters is unbelievable. They live in an alternate universe.
@@speen9430 8 people? Did this comment originally say that or are you saying it?
Well i dont care, heres the fact
“Up to 3,000 Ukraine troops killed since Russia invaded, says Zelenskiy, as battle rages in Mariupol | Ukraine | The Guardian.”
This will be excellent target for Ukraine troops
Witch troops hand full of Ukrops Nazi,s 🤣
its hard to target anything when u r POW
@@galean87 something more stupid to add??
@@stickwelder9920 right, it's more stupid!
small-caliber artillery is a smart thing, cheap and angry, tank armor and the rate of fire of Tunguska is a good combination against helicopters and infantry in the bushes.
Are the tow hooks in the front or rear asking for a friend?
Not an exact equivalent, but in April, Germany authorized Krauss-Maffei to transfer 50 Flakpanzer Gepard anti-aircraft vehicles to Ukraine. Which would be just as devastating in an urban environment... And there are other former operators of the Flakpanzer that could provide mothballed stocks too. I wonder who will run out of kit first?
Firs its wouod be idiot to use them in such way as they are anti air, second the ukrainains will need months of training ammo, spare parts and mechanics for thsoe vechicles not to mention place to repair them.
Those won't be available until july unfortunately.
I'm German and I know the Gepard a little bit.
Basically, the idea to use the Gepard in urbarn warfare is absolutely nice. High rate of fire, stunning caliber, good protection, due to the Leopard chassis. But there is a huge problem. The amount of ammo which will be delivered. It's only about 60.000 rounds, something about that. For AA it's ok, because you fire in precise bursts. But for ground fighting, even in urban environment, the 60k is not enough! It's for 15 Gepard, so you only have 4.000 rounds for each tank.
And, that's the next problem, the 35mm caliber ammo is very rare. 😕
Urban warfare is not what the Gepard was built for. Its ground combat capabilities are more of a makeshift self-defense option that would quickly deplete its resources.
What it was build for is turning every aircraft attack against a battle tank group into certain Kamikaze. Even if it is running out of ammo quickly, it's still an effective deterrent by asking any approaching fighter bomber pilots: "Who wants to be the first to die for glorious Fatherland?"
High velocity 35 mm bullets don't give a damn about your radar and IR countermeasures and good luck escaping its tracking computer once it has locked onto you.
@@pfefferle74
It doesn't matter, how something is built for. What matters is, is it cappable?
The famous 8.8cm flak was not build to be a anti-tank weapon, but it excels in that role.
There is NO protection on top for the weapons.
They can put an umbrella up, that would be about the same as any other armor they have.
why is the barrel vibrating?
But does it have a hyper alloy combat chassis.
its literally a heavy IFV, but without dismounts... so go figure.
pretty sure that some of the modern IFV's that are out there with ABM(airburst ammo) are much better doing the job what the Terminator supposed to do.
btw. the Terminator has no ABM.
but the Terminator fits the russian style of war, sending vehicles and tanks into urban and forest areas to fight by it own, i gues :)
What does "without dismounts" mean? Does that mean it isn't a personnel carrier (personnel dismounts)?
@@misterguts yes, troops in the back
Because western doctrine uses mechanized infantry to protect its armor where as the Russians just die and send more because their doctrine is reatrded and hasn't really evolved since WW2
The important question everyone wants answered is how high the turret goes when this thing is blessed by Saint Javelin
I am sure it will tear tens of nazis bodies in pieces before that happens... Lol
Keep on dreaming
Not that high as the ammo is lower level so will not cook so effectively.
Impressive, love it 👍🇬🇧
Beautiful footage
Hard to believe that two handful of these vehicles will make a real difference. They will probably be taken out by Ukrainian forces one after the other. My cause some local harm at first, but in the end will be great trophies for the Ukrainians.
There are over 300 built
@@gabbot141 There's no reliable source for that number. Just because it's on Wikipedia doesn't mean it's true.
Absolutely nuts prediction.
@@BravoCheesecake So if there is no reliable source why believe there are only a few when there could be more?
I haven't seen more than four of them.
Russia hasn't lacked firepower in this war, it's lacked the skill and experience to use what it already has. And the morale and discipline to function as a coherent force on the battle field. These "Terminators" are going to make very little difference if Russians still are unable to work as combined arms teams against Ukrainians who can. And even then Russia lacks the dismounted infantry to support its armor.
One Ukrainian soldier with even an old RPG-7 could take one of these out from the right quadrant. And Ukraine has systems that are far more capable like Stugna-P and Javelin. Or Switchblades and even highly accurate artillery.
Russia is still treating this war as mainly a psychological warfare conflict where all it has to do is scare Ukrainians enough they surrender. That has been highly ineffective from the start.
Thanks for a concise explanation. The last two paragraphs are spot on!
@Ricardo Alcaraz Ukraine rotated over 400,000 troops through the battle zone in the Donbass over the last eight years and has spent extensive time training their personnel, much of it with western trainers.
They have obviously mastered the skills they need to be effective against Russian forces.
Russia has reduced conscription from two years to one and has reduced funding for training across the board. Plus serious issues with poorly maintained and often missing equipment especially secure comms.
Sure some Russians lack the will to fight in Ukraine, but even those who have it lack the training, experience and often equipment to do so effectively. They are making the same mistakes they did in the first days of the war while Ukrainian units have gained a great deal of experience.
Furthermore they lack the logistic legs for their army to stand on, having a much lower number of support units per combat unit. This manifests in tanks being abandoned due to lack of fuel, ammo, food, etc etc as we have seen across Ukraine
Guys you are not wrong nor right...This is hybrid warfare on conventional scale for the first time in history.... first of all the first force constisted of the basics and old equipment then step by step learning the enemies tactics and all else whilst also supressing morale in the final stage of the operation we will see what Russia will have to offer because nobody will put their best cards out until the final.
You must be an American. Ukrainians are trained by Americans. And the Americans are helpless against a strong enemy. Therefore, when you say that one can hit a tank, you don’t even understand what nonsense you are talking about. Revealing a position is guaranteed suicide. There were few kamikazes among the Afghans, and even fewer among the Ukrainians are trained by Americans.
Whats the New tank feature ?
2 canons
On a T72 chassis makes it just as vunerable as the other kit - A Stugna- P would have no difficulty before its guns were in range
the "BMPT Terminator-1" column that was filmed in Ukraine is actually in the T-90A chassis, I don't know why these "experts" in the video said that it is in the T-72 chassis, and has only 3 crew members when it has a crew of 5 which consists of: a vehicle commander, a driver, a gunner, and two grenade launcher operators. I think these "experts" confused "Terminator-1" with "BMPT-72 Terminator 2" which is on the T-72 chassis and has only 3 crew. "BMPT-72 Terminator 2" is just a concept of modernazation T-72 and Russian army at the moment only have "Terminator-1" in T-90A chassis
@@amaximoff4559 makes little difference - an Nlaw can cut through 500 mm of armor - now Russian troops are being issued with T62 - just about any anti tank missile can kill - you wouldn't waste a Javelin on one
True, but this thing is supposed to make AT crews keep their heads down.
@@andersbjrnsen7203 As there are only 10 maybe a Brimstone volley
"a vehicle with a protection of a main battle tank"
Russian tanks protecting its world record of longest distance a tank turret has traveled through the air when hit🤣🤣🤣
Any comment that references "flying turrets" is just silly internet trend posting. Based on those silly comments, Mariupol should be under Ukranian control.
@@theorncampbell4432 no no no
Its bast on the long history of russian tanks sending their turrets airborne iver and over again duo to how they make the tank and store ammo
As cheap aa possibke with literally no regard for crew safty. .if you think this reputation came from the war in ukraine??? My guy...what rock you been under since the 60s'🤣🤣
@@SJstackinbodys God damn your English is atrocious.
this isn't a tool of war, this is a parade decoration. They only made 10 of these, just enough for a parade. it is the same as their T-90 tanks... enough for a parade.
Special military parade
It`s Funny how you tells us a lie !
do they blow up as well as a regular T-72?
That turret got look tempting to the eye of a Javelin! 🤣🤣🤣
I mean, yeah, it seems like a nice piece of hardware. But at best it is as durable as a T-72, and those get blown up all the time. Dont see why Javelin, NLAW and Panzerfaust should have any bigger problems with it.
its a tank ment for urban combat, it will do beter against infantry atleast, but yeah, being a tank against atgm are a free death these days
the only reason they would have a hard time is if the tank saw the AT position before they fired at the tank
@@dalejrjunior1298 Yeah but thats true for any military vehical.
@@blablubb8615 true this one would be alot better of disposing of AT positons tho i think its a 30mm cannon right? looked to be decent fire rate too
It attacks but can't defend and if it has no fuel or caterpillars or driver it's going nowhere! Besides there's only so much ammo it can carry so if these things are targeted how do you supply them ?
Did I see this Russian terminator vehicle in the movie Terminator 3 rise of the machine? Maybe they got the ideal from there?
Did the Brit said "to finally claim a small victory"?? lol What about kherson, Mariupol and the massive surrendering? what about the total eradication of Azov army? what about the 80% of Ukraines coastline now underfull control of Russia and the fact that they got their land bridge? lol This Brits military analysts are the best at sugar coating for Zelensky lol
@@ibrahimmoncada7214 you're best at being a shill for Putin.
@@ibrahimmoncada7214 what if it was an acquired accent from abroad..?
freudian slips sounds like you harbour some isms buddy
Nice 👍
Ngl, this one looks pretty cool. Like a Decepticon's vehicle form or something.
The crew may have an enhanced survivability as there appears to be an 'airgap' between the active turret and the hull (the most vulnerable part of a T72). The weapon may be destroyed, but the crew may survive. Thoughts?
Seems like it, it also uses much smaller less violently combusting ammunition so a cookoff should be much less violent. in addition the turret is unmanned and part of the 30mm ammunition seems to be stored in it making it safer for the crew.
Lastly the ATGM system is mounted on the outside so no risk of cookoff there either, should be much more survivable for the crew.
How many minutes of training will the Terminator crew have? And was the Schwartnegger movie dubbed properly? 😊
I think javelin and n-law will mean they expire
If it's based on the T-72 that means munitions are still stored under the loader guy. It's just lipstick on a pig.
you make a good point i never thought of that.
this thing looks like a more modern version from the old flak tank Guepard that Germany did send to Ukraine...
GEPARD,
Cose it kinda is based on this idea. During the war in Chechnya Russian find out that self-propelled AA vechicles (or "flak tanks") was very usefull on urban environment - ZSU-23-4 Shilka, armed with quad 23mm autocanon with high elevation can reach oponents on higher flors and torn them to peaces/suppres them quite effectivly. Terminator is a based on this discovery - 2 30mm autocanons with high elevation + tank armor + bunch of termal sensor to detect infantry instead of AA radar.
That thank is regrettably to good , it hits infatery, suppress fire, on tree lines, you can't get close to the thanks to get them with the javelin. A new strategy would have to be developed to get them.
Javelins, NLAWs, and bears, oh my!!🙀
They will probably have as much luck with this as they did with the T72 ie be terminated.
Hahahahaha, Russia hasnt learnt anything. Tanks are redundant. Airpower is everything.
Nice catchy name. Will it be as good as the T90?
It sure looks cool!