Continental TerrainContact A/T - 55,000 Mile Review
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 вер 2024
- Forgot to mention road noise is minimal. More than your average all season but less than most AT tires. A solid option for 3 season use. (Wet, Gravel, Dirt, Pavement, Light Mud)
Not a tire I would go with for 4 season use as winter performance is poor.
I also recommend you do not go with any A/T tire for winter (snowflake rated or not), even the most budget-friendly winter tires outperform the highest end A/T tires.
Were they smooth at very high speed? (No vibration or balancing issues?)
Yes, no issues at 95mph
Hey bro you got your money's worth already
what are you going to replace the Continential's with?
Likely a Load range C or E tires in the same size. Options are limited in C, Grabber ATX or BFG K02s, but would be a more comfy ride while being sturdier than these SL rated tires. If i do go with Load range E, I think itll be too rough of a ride. Well also see what sales are going on in the spring.
@@rippinrogers ... agree, Load E would be to stiff. But, if you don't need anything more than the SL, then stick with those. It's not like you can (or should) overload ur vehicle anyway.
@@biz4twobiz463 Thats the thing thats a little odd when using the SL XL C D E F rating to compare. I've seen load Range C tires with a 113 load rating. And then these tires in the video are SL rated and have a 115 load rating. So while both are above the stock 108 load rating, the C range tire, which I would assume is capable of carrying more weight than the SL tires, is rated to carry less.
If I were to gt a Load Range E tire the load rating will likley be 118/121, all these load ratings are at max tire pressure and i doubt ill ever run any tire over 40-50 psi.
@@rippinrogers ... yes, it's very confusing and weird how they rate the tires. Maybe the unicorn tire for you should be a Load D. haha Well, good luck either way.