2:47 `git checkout teammatesbranch`? What pull and fetch have to do with that? More over, to update his branch locally you could pull and still get intact commits since we haven't made changes in that branch? Kind of bad example
Great explaination, however, could you go on to the next step. You would CHECKOUT the Teamate Branch, correct, saving your changes in Your Branch. Then when you are done you would use checkout again to Your Branch.. correct. How when your Teamate merges to main and gets rid of his branch, the next fetch, does that then remove your local copy of Teamate Branch?
Great video Kevin! Is there a command that pulls the updated files from the remote branch and replaces your local files with the updated files? I'm asking because I don't want a bunch of new folders with the same data cramming my work space
In the documentation it says: ", git pull runs git fetch [..] and then [..] will call either git rebase or git merge to reconcile diverging branches." That means, that git pull is just a use of git fetch with another command afterwards, which means, that git push will also get the branch of the teammate.. .. and your statement about the main difference is just wrong. Pls correct me, if I missed something :)
`git fetch` fetches all the changes from the remote repository and keep them isolated (doesn't merge) (`man git fetch` - Fetch branches and/or tags (collectively, "refs") from one or more other repositories, along with the objects necessary to complete their histories. Remote-tracking branches are updated) Whereas `git pull` fetches the changes and merges them immediately. (`man git pull` - Incorporates changes from a remote repository into the current branch. In its default mode, git pull is shorthand for git fetch followed by git merge FETCH_HEAD.)
The graph makes it so easy to understand. Thanks so much. Your video deserves more comments. Good job, Kevin!
i agree - the graphics is a great help!
2:47 `git checkout teammatesbranch`? What pull and fetch have to do with that? More over, to update his branch locally you could pull and still get intact commits since we haven't made changes in that branch? Kind of bad example
Kane Williamson discussing GIT :)
😂😂😂
short, clear and concise
Understood the concept completely.
the graph help so much to understand the difference between pull and fetch . thnks
Nicely explained mate. Good Job!
Great explaination, however, could you go on to the next step. You would CHECKOUT the Teamate Branch, correct, saving your changes in Your Branch. Then when you are done you would use checkout again to Your Branch.. correct. How when your Teamate merges to main and gets rid of his branch, the next fetch, does that then remove your local copy of Teamate Branch?
Great video Kevin! Is there a command that pulls the updated files from the remote branch and replaces your local files with the updated files? I'm asking because I don't want a bunch of new folders with the same data cramming my work space
Não encontrei uma explicação tão simples em português. Essa foi simples e direta. Obrigado!
what shall I do after fetched Teammate's Branch? Switch Teammate's Branch and then ? thanks . I don't under what does git fetch do
not surprised you didn't understand... I've been struggling with Git for a year. it's a stupid system
In the documentation it says:
", git pull runs git fetch [..] and then [..] will call either git rebase or git merge to reconcile diverging branches."
That means, that git pull is just a use of git fetch with another command afterwards, which means, that git push will also get the branch of the teammate..
.. and your statement about the main difference is just wrong.
Pls correct me, if I missed something :)
I was confused by the documents too. from my real life git experience, this video is right.
`git fetch` fetches all the changes from the remote repository and keep them isolated (doesn't merge) (`man git fetch` - Fetch branches and/or tags (collectively, "refs") from one or more other repositories, along with the objects necessary to complete their histories. Remote-tracking branches are updated)
Whereas `git pull` fetches the changes and merges them immediately. (`man git pull` - Incorporates changes from a remote repository into the current branch. In its default mode, git pull is shorthand for git fetch followed by git merge FETCH_HEAD.)
Good tutorial, clear and precise explanation.
Thanks a lot for the video!
Thank you kevin . The graph made really easy to understand.
congratulations fam!!!
awesome dude nice explaination ,more clear with diagram
Ok and do you got a video for how to load a plugin in to the software ?
best explanation ever for this topic ! thanks so much!
Thanks, understood git pull & git fetch
cool video and makes it easy to understand by using the graphics for a total git noob...keep on the great job!
Nice explanation
is git pull = git fetch and git merge in same time?
yes
Thank you, man!
Great explanation. Keep it up!
want more videos on all Git commands like this
This was really helpful, thanks!
works perfectly, thank you
Perfect!
Thanks alot, great job
17 minutes than i've seen in years.
simply explained !! Thanks
thank you!
Nice
Thank you
I understand better now. thanks
oh those fast teammates )
Thanks !
👍
ONE WORD: SUCCINCT - Thank You
you are way more handsome than an average people.
explanation of tNice tutorialngs and how they work 11/10 video
+sub, workis
Git is just way too complex to be productive with. Been using SVN for 10 years without issue but Git is destroying my brain.
instead.... soday I’ll manage to export sotNice tutorialng decent on soft... one day lol
I hope it didn't explode
yup Hogwarts dropout Harry lost his magic wand
👍