Conjugate Prior for Variance of Normal Distribution with known mean

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 вер 2015
  • This is a demonstration of how to show that an Inverse Gamma distribution is the conjugate prior for the variance of a normal distribution with known mean.
    These short videos work through mathematical details used in the Multivariate Statistical Modelling module at UWE.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 15

  • @garikco
    @garikco 2 роки тому +1

    This is super helpful. Much clearer than my graduate econometrics course

  • @TuNguyen-ox5lt
    @TuNguyen-ox5lt 6 років тому

    it really helps me a lot . I stucked when i got to find posterior distribution for mu with unknown mu and variance . I just figured out when i saw your video . Thanks

  • @nshmr1
    @nshmr1 3 роки тому

    This is great!

  • @jinsillee21
    @jinsillee21 7 років тому

    Thank you so much!

  • @nikky2609
    @nikky2609 3 роки тому

    Thanks this is great

  • @josephsantarcangelo9310
    @josephsantarcangelo9310 7 років тому

    Thanks !

  • @lemyul
    @lemyul 4 роки тому

    thank you

  • @viperz301
    @viperz301 3 роки тому

    THANK YOU

  • @thyenchen2765
    @thyenchen2765 2 роки тому

    really useful

  • @uhaankuku
    @uhaankuku 5 років тому

    how can we show that the wishart distribution is a conjugate prior of the multi variate normal distribution

  • @rolfjohansen5376
    @rolfjohansen5376 3 роки тому

    I am able to do the likelihood, but I am looking for the formula calculating the prior distribution for the gaussian mean parameter .....!!

    • @deetoher
      @deetoher  3 роки тому +1

      Is this the one you are looking for?
      It works on the basis of a known variance.
      ua-cam.com/video/c-d05z0_5mw/v-deo.html

    • @rolfjohansen5376
      @rolfjohansen5376 3 роки тому

      @@deetoher your reply is chockingly fast, I will take a look at and try to grasp how the prior was constructed ... thanks

    • @rolfjohansen5376
      @rolfjohansen5376 3 роки тому

      @@deetoher saw your vid, from my beginning perspective I understand now that the prior is a distribution without data , but shall combined with a likelihood to be able to manipulate data. I was a little confused at first as priors are something you choose and they got types and properties (example: conjugate priors are good for updating information, proper/improper priors). I did not get a clear picture why you did choose exactly "that" prior , or why you preferred it in this setting based on certain needs you might have. Thanks! (now a subscriber)