I helped Joseph Newman build a motor. A long one similar but different than yours. I couldn't turn the shift with my bare hands, when he applied the voltage to it, I couldn't slow it down with both hands. It had the current of one battery going through it.
After looking at Joseph Newman’s video, it does look like you are on the right track. I believe that Joseph Newman uses a flywheel to store mechanical energy (like a battery) on the rotor. Whether what Joseph Newman is producing is free energy or not, it’s at minimum a very high-efficiency motor. Check out his ‘Big Eureka’ concept for the heavy flywheel. Great video!
For sure ;-) It would have been nice if I had created a new source of free energy, but I've found it can also be highly rewarding to find out what doesn't work as well.
I am just amazed at the distance of the magnetic field you showed Grant. Maybe using more shielding would force more efficiency from this idea ?? What do you think fella ??
I'm not convinced more shielding would help, but it's an interesting idea. It seems that most every so called free energy idea I find turns out to be a scam. Here's free energy claim that sounds intriguing, but it sounds to good to be true. ua-cam.com/video/JU2JyE9h5o8/v-deo.html
@@GrantsPassTVRepair You are correct, every free energy idea I have seen so far is a SCAM. But there is something Dave that would work. Here goes, when you take a magnet the shape of a doenut and put N fracking N they will never touch when placed on a dowel pole. Using this idea, you can take the same magnets and place them onto a fixture. The one is placed fixed, the other one you have attached to a connecting rod just like a gasoline engine. You will have to use Mumetal to short out the magnetic fields when the piston is going back up to have both magnets next to each other. The the mu metal shield has to instantly be removed. This will force the engine to cycle again and again. This has to work, as it does work when one uses his hand to move the metal in and out. Does that make sense ??? Peace vf
Thanks!!! The secret to the Newman motor which everyone seems to leave out of their projects is heavy flywheel spinning which does the actual work , which equals horse power. And a capacitor bank parallel with batteries to absorb the backspike to feed actual amperage to the run batteries along with the voltage. Do not use a power supply, batteries only. The caps are storage also. Your speed will increase along with effencie. Please try this, I would like to see an update of this, by the way, I would love to have that machine!!!
I think that calling them free energy generators throws people off. It would be more accurate to call them converters. We are surrounded by energy all the time, these machines just convert it into a form we can use. It can be unlimited, however its not generating anything. Keep up the good work!
It depends highly on the used commutator materials... If you use Graphite and copper you get these nice huge Backspikes Newman described in his book...if you are using other materials or just transistors the effect does not occur...it it some kind of battery effect you produce, when Dissimular Metals like copper and graphite touch and generate a voltage... The Spark is then just the "conductive electrolyte"... Regards Stefan.
Hi Stefan, I believe we spoke many years ago when I was part of the Newman news group. From what I recall you spent a lot of time experimenting with Joes ideas, and I remember someone saying the extra energy was related to the spark. If the extra power effect goe away using transistors that would seem to confirm what you are saying. As you can see my coil here is to small relative to what Joe taught, I tried a larger coil using a 12 gauge wire, but still far from anything Joe built. ua-cam.com/video/DKxCPJKRM9Q/v-deo.html
You build lots but I'd love to see you tune some of your designs. You can easily make your latest Newman motor way more efficient buy using transitors or mosfet to eliminate the spark ont the commutator.That will make it much more efficient and reliable
May I ask if you have tried tipping the Newman motor on end? I have seen somewhere that the higher you get in elevation above the ground that the amperage will increase. I haven’t tried it myself.
I have not tried tipping the motor up on its end, but when you speak about the amperage increasing are you talking about the amperage the motor consumes as a motor, or the amperage it can produce as a generator? From a physics point of view I can't see why tipping the motor up would help, but I'd be curious as to who is making such a claim and why.
@@GrantsPassTVRepair I will keep you in mind if I come across that article again. Also I was wondering if you could utilize the following information for your experiments. The information came to me by way of my friend Pamela Aaralyn around 2016. She channeled Nikola Tesla and she asked me if I wanted to share it. I did but it but none in my circles at that time utilized it. This is only a small section of the four-page transcript: Does raising the frequency of a Tesla Coil increase its power? "You would need to utilize a Class E RF amplifier. I prefer one made by Nathan and Alan Sokal in 1975. The Class E amplifier makes use of a resonant circuit to get around the usual problems of switching power semiconductors at high frequencies. This topology is now finding commercial success in high power radio transmitters and RF generators for plasma generation and induction heating. High voltage MOSFETs are the usual choice of switching device. Advantages of the Class E power amplifier: 1. Simple design uses only one switching device. 2. Eliminates turn-on losses due to stored energy in the devices output capacitance. 3. Eliminates turn-on losses due to overlap of voltage and current when device turns on. 4. Zero-voltage at turn-on eliminates Miller effect due to drain-gate capacitance. 5. Minimizes turn-off losses by limiting rate of rise of voltage when device turns on. 6. Circuit makes use of stray capacitance and inductance that would normally be hindrance. 7. Very high efficiency (90 - 95%) so very little power to be dissipated as heat. 8. Low EMI and harmonic output because of the smooth drain voltage and soft switching. Perhaps the main disadvantage of the Class E arrangement is that it is relatively intolerant of incorrect matching into its load. Whilst load matching is usually a good radio transmitter, this intolerance to mismatching may cause problems when put to service as a Tesla Coil driver." What are we missing in terms of how to harness energy, today? "Copper, quartz and magnets, that simple. The pull of the magnet catalyzes the copper to affect the quartz. The energy within the quartz then is harnessed like a centrifuge - it disperses and then returns to its’ center. If my vision in my human time had prevailed, you would be now tapping into solar energy from space.” Here is a power source that utilizes radio waves to produce power: Goodbye Global Warming - Maxwell Chikumbutso New Green Energy - Saith Power - Greener Power Machine: ua-cam.com/video/EZfPvjURcm8/v-deo.html This should hold your interest for a while. Have a lovely weekend and enjoy your family.
@@donparkinson9561 At the very least this information is not complete, but to me this information sounds like someone is trying to sound intelligent about electronics without saying anything of value. It's as if they copied a few sentences from a book on class E power amplifiers, and added their own words to try and impress others. I'd be cautious with anyone who claims they can channel someone who has passed on..
I'll tell ya Dave, if you could get that huge magnet perfectly balanced it would be substantially more efficient..... I still think there is a way of magnets opposing and being able to generate a small amount of current with just the opposing forces.....however, I digress because if it were entirely possible then it would be in patent... Anyway, stay safe and how is the TV service end of the business going. I still get calls for repairs but I just don't pursue them now that I'm working full time. When I retire, I'm going start rebuilding/restoring old radios and possibly TVs from the 60s 70s 80's if possible. Be well.😀
Hi Frank, Even though it violates the laws of physics, and most of the people who claim to have produced free energy are con men, I like to keep an open mind about this. On the business side of things it's been a little slower than usual, but I'm enjoying the slow down, and as you see my mind never stops dreaming about other possibilities.
That's nothing but great, wow what a build. Please try the circuit "self Sustaining Pulse motor", a simple oscillator circuit. Work with almost any bipolar coil setup. I would like to see the results. Very good
I watched one video under this title, but I didn't see any proof it was self sustaining. Not to write the idea off, but I have a clock that can operate over a year on a single battery. To me this only proves it's energy efficient, but not self sustaining.
@@GrantsPassTVRepair It has run over a year and the battery voltage has stayed the same, time will tell, will make an update video in June. Look at the self sustaining pulse motor circuit using one Darlington array. I would want to see what your very long device would do as an oscillator and how much the cap charge. You have the expertise, I just try it and fry it and look for positive results. This one you built is stupindous, as for as I'm concerned, it's over the top. That's a bunch of big magnets and wire.
*I saw him when he was on the Jonny Carson show that they filmed in his garage with all the patent office people there. It was a 5000 lb magnet and after he got it spinning fast, he went inside and turned everything on and went back to the garage. The scientists said "your batteries are getting low'' to which he replied, ''I know'' and proceeded to unplug the motor from the batteries, plugged it into the wall and then plugged the battery charger in and went back inside, sat down and started watching tv with the AC on! He was selling electricity back to the electric co. Jonny stood on stage with him and they begged the people to write their ''representatives'' asking them to allow him to get a patent. He was never invited back...*
I've seen the video clip with Joseph Newman on the Johnny Carson show, but I've never heard anything about him selling electricity to the power company, and the magnet I remember was 650 pounds.
I think you may have missed part of the movie about Joe! the part where he says it converts "MASS" TO ENERGY ON A ONE TO ONE PROCESS! The mass of the coil and rotor are key to the operation of the machine.
No, I must have heard Joe talk about converting mass to energy dozens of times. I was a big fan of Joe at one time. I spoke with him on the phone, bought his books, and did dozens of experiments with his ideas. Here is my last one. ua-cam.com/video/DKxCPJKRM9Q/v-deo.html
Although it is technically impossible to make free energy, there is no hope without trying, and nothing to be learned without doing some kind of experiment. :)
Not accurate. The laws of physics that no matter is created or destroyed, and that no energy is created, only transformed are flawed laws. Their premise is correct but limited by “space”. In a ideal vacuum where all parameters could be controlled, they laws may be accurate but it’s ideal and not realistic. The sun and globe spiral in a space that we cannot define. Centrifugal, gravitational, solar rays may all be finite sources of energy, but if their source energy source is greater than our life time they are sources worth harnessing. Magnetism and electromagnetism are power sources that can be harnessed. They output forces greater than the ones introduced. Perpetual motion is possible. Or a perpetual generator that feeds on energy sources that are not consumable in a lifetime are possible. In my humble opinion. I know that is over simplified but... I don’t think we need to over complicate things either.
@@INSIDEHARDWARE acording to Wikipedia planetary orbit is Not Perpetual. Well it's Gonna last for billions of years. Who cares if "Perpetual motion is impossible"? That phrase is More like an excuse to not research and experiment
Newmand had two things for efficiency that were important, lots of copper and a flywheel for inertia ...... I'm still figuring out how to make the commutator fully elektronic ......
Self synchronized running generators it works ... You need two or three or four different motors in one unit ... It's been done long time a go ..🙄 👌🏼👌🏼👌🏼
I don't think he got his York from the magnets and the coil, as much as he used the kinetic energy from the flywheel and use the back EMF to charge the AC capacitor that provided the kick every 180 degrees, I have a motor on my Channel that I built, it ran until the battery too good to run in the morning
Design is more important than powerful magnets also a cylindrical shape is more efficient the idea of Newman motor is to create torque with voltage so magnets has to create a cylindrical shape to create torque considering weight. To fix that issue u should separate your magnets suggest see Newman motor design because that's his secret. Building a big magnet with small one is the secret
The amount of wire in the coil is paramount to the success of Joe's motor , The principle behind the motor is the high resistance in the coil , It's very important . . The more the better . Joe Newman used 4000lbs of wire in his motor he named Big Eureka .. Fast and frequent switching is also paramount. . . The "ON" cycle of the coil is pulsed through the commutator . . It has serrated contacts. . The high resistance requires high voltage , which causes large sparks at the commutator . . The way to calculate the power output requires measuring shaft Torq/power , not just electrical power , Total energy.. That's where most people make mistakes in power output calculations .
@@GrantsPassTVRepair , The underlying principle of Joe's Motor has to do with Electron motion spinning around an atom's nucleolus in the copper wire . It has gyroscopic forces . . Joe has written several books . Still available online . Every atom we know of , has the same action .. All materials have different amounts of electrons than the others on the Periodic table of elements . . Conductive materials have "loose" electrons that move from atom to atom , that's what we call Electricity . Perpetual motion : It's been proven before , back in the 1930's A " *PERPETUAL MOTION HOLDER* " can prove the endless motion of electrons . ua-cam.com/video/Oa4oBUBSEzs/v-deo.html Magnetism and Electricity are one and the same thing . . Joe's motor can be built in many different styles , it's the Gyroscopic principle that makes it produce more than it uses . I spent years trying to come to my own understand of how "Free Energy" is possible . . Joe's theory is one of the simplest to understand .
@@THOMASTHESAILOR I have Two of Joes books. One of them is the 7th edition of the energy machine of Joseph Newman, and the 2nd book I have is called "The Last Judgment" .The second book is has prophecies by Joe that never took place,
@@GrantsPassTVRepair , LOL, a lot prophecies never take place . We all have our doomsday visions and hopes for a glorious miracle . . Ya gotta give the guy credit for being up front about his . . He's an open hearted Man of God. . Most people don't talk about their visions .. Joe Newman was an inventor , A Thinker . . He invented the Plastic/concrete Barbell weights. . He started a successful company and sold them . . . Eventually he sold the business and created Big Eureka ..
I read the comments,man people can be Di%ks. Don't pay them any mind. Most of these people just look for a video to tear down,guess they are sharing their own misery. keep the videos coming and all my best.
Judging by that compass, your wasting about 4 feet out of flipping magnetic field! Try replacing that much void with copper wire and see what kind of spike you get! And learn about the back spike! Its quite important.
I liked your video, but a couple of points. First, you have a serious balance issue with your initially presented motor. Even if you discovered something from your configuration (like a gradual increase in acceleration) you may not notice. Second, you demonstrate the effect on your compass yet have all those magnetic motors sitting in close proximity to the experiment. Opposing fields will corrupt you data or outcome. Dont give up!
The iron core doesn't increase efficiency of DC permanent magnet motor. MAXIM. Efficiencies and the Power of electric motor are two different things. Minutes 2:57. I my self have tested coreless DC motor with 75% EFF and the motor that you show at 2:51 has no more then that.
Seems that you don't have enough windings on your stator... those magnets have weight to them, and if you used their mass for you instead of against you, you'd have a better outcome...
Without the back emf there is no more energy, it is only transformed from one phase to another, look more into it and understand the concept, imagine that the current flowing is the river and capturing the back electromotive force is the waterwheel
I know a guy that knew Joe Newman. This guy built a machine. I listened to the theory and thought it was crap. But something was happening. I call it a magnetic reactor and it really doesn't need any moving parts. They say there are 4 known forces in nature. Everyone knows the strong and weak forces. We have fusion and we're working on fusion. I call quasars gravitational reactors. They turn matter into energy through gravity. One left. Magnetism. And Newman stumbled upon a magnetic reactor.
If you can build a free energy device that actually works you can change the world for the better, and become wealthy in the process. I look forward to hearing of your success should you build such a device.
please forgive the copy + paste Grant, and grants viewers :) , - but i gave a reply too my favorite famous hacker about 30 mins ago, and the answer is well suited too your work. - in terms of addressing the "more in than out" problem @Gary McKinnon thanks for trying Gary. i have posted videos on my other channel of 3 working FE machines, and they are. my newman machine (20kgs),, my milkovitch two stage oscillator pendulm (100kgs) and my linear motor are my main 3 achievements. other than disproving countless other devices. but sadly my 3, despite being REAL OU, all have an ROI of around 10 - 20 years. based on current electricity prices. if you are interested in the linear motor, i will paste you my videos too watch, in order too paint the operational picture and some development . the best COP of this machine is around 10. - but i believe 20 is easily achievable (at 1watt input). however by the time the input power reaches 30watts or so, the efficiency will drop following a curve, down too COP1 part 7 : ua-cam.com/video/uavoK5VQQNQ/v-deo.html part 8 : ua-cam.com/video/eP1MM9hOvEc/v-deo.html part 9 : ua-cam.com/video/7bhDG0YE6KA/v-deo.html part 11 : ua-cam.com/video/vjxzKuikg5Y/v-deo.html part 12 : ua-cam.com/video/rtE0NPCHwQQ/v-deo.html basically. imagine you have 2 magnets placed 1 meter apart that are repelling eachother. and an 1watt electromagnet inbetween, - now you can increase the Gauss of the magnets too infinity, and the force of the electromagnet follows.
It's nice to see someone else experimenting, I find your videos difficult to follow due to back ground noise and an abundance of unrelated ideas, but I think I understand what your trying to do.
pancake on pancake layers connected in parallel and you will be surprised. It is essentially what creative science and research sells in their SP500 plans
I have great respect for your work and time doing these experimets, yet I disagree with your conclusion regarding Newmans motor. Just because you failed to achieve his result, does not mean your conclusion is true. Newmans motor also work as flywheel that stores kinetic energy.
Yes perhaps Joe was on to something as all those engineers claimed, but his public demonstrations sure looked suspicious in the later part of his life. Did you happen to see this wonderful documentary about his life? ua-cam.com/video/CrJIzrmX1mI/v-deo.html
I always find it interesting that it is claimed to be impossible, but the theory of thermodynamics was 1850's -- before modern bearings, and concepts of electricity and magnetism. One thing people like to point to is the patent office refuses to patent any such device; however, that same group rejects patents for paragraph and line numbering mistakes, grammatical errors, and having too many words in the abstract... and let Marconi steal Tesla's work, Bell steal Gray's work, and many others. Engineering should be based on mathematical formulas, so where are the numbers for thermodynamics (bearing friction, atmospheric resistance, and other factors)? I have to think someone has done this work, and wish to see it. Thanks.
There is no breaking of the law of thermodynamics in a working Overunity concept. There are a lot of energy fields we do Not see with our eyes that such a generator Would tap into. Such as an antenna for atmospheric electricity. (wich is the closest concept of free energy that i can comfirms is real). (without the use of water or sun light) Read a book called "shape power". You May find some useful insight in the quest for free energy. It is all about the science of shapes and how they can be appllied to produce some satisfying results. The same author has also written a book on free energy.
The biggest problem with perpetual motion machines is the friction. It's the friction what eventually slow down the machine untill is stops. Another fun projects are the socalled "Joule thief" circuits, where a single AA battery can power a LED for a week and pull the AA battery almost completely empty (till 0,3a0,4V). Those "Joule thiefs" can sometimes be found in LED torches, where they use the popular HH004F LED Driver. This LED driver looks like a transistor, and needs only a single inductor for powering multiple LED's with 1 AA battery. With such a LED driver i have already powered 20 White power LED's with 1 AA battery. The basic schematic of such a LED driver can be found here : www.circuitsdiy.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/HH004F_LED_driver_Circuit.png The maximum operating voltage of this LED driver is 6V , and it will produce a clean squarewave pattern of more then 200Khz (depending on the supplied voltage).
I'm not sure I understand the criticisms in some of the comments. Sure, there are no white lab coats and no clipboards with a slew of numbers and measurements. But this is still a bare-bones version of the scientific process at work here. Someone says: "I achieved X" (in this case free energy, but it doesn't really matter). And then you're supposed to say: "I don't believe you. Let me see if I can replicate your results." As long as you don't bend your experiment to fit your own preconceptions (which he didn't), I don't see anything wrong with it. You could perhaps make the argument that even looking for free energy is a waste of resources. But they're his resources to waste, and he seems to be having fun. So what exactly is the issue?
It is human curiosity.... so I develop a small one. What I found is that there is different movement when negative path go's through shaft and 🧲 and separate negative path. I did numbers of experiments on it and got surprising effects. When I thought again I realized that over unit effect is possible only when any system go into resonating mode 🤔😇🤩. 😠😡🤬 but what we, at list I had teach Resonance mens distraction and you should avoide it....
@@GrantsPassTVRepair ok You are wasting magnetic power. Just try with 2 magnet and stuck on metal ( magnet should electrically connected ). Make two coils which will cover up the rotations. The spicks should travels to shaft. The moter you're showing at 6.00 minutes is the correct one
If free energy existed I would buy a supersonic military jet airplane and I would fly all over the world at full speed, moving continuosly from one place to another, and I would come to the US to buy many things that are cheaper over there.
This isn’t a knock on you just the overall language used in alternative energy circles. But I believe that wide spread use of the term perpetual motion, in reference to any of a huge array of technologies, only serves to keep wider society from taking any of it seriously. When the average person hears perpetual motion, their brain automatically shuts down to anything you have to say. It completely poisons the well and serves to ensure lack of interest, and most importantly funding from the wider scientific community. Take any number of the most important tech innovations over the past 20 years and before showing them publicly, call it perpetual motion. Odds are it would still just be great idea that lost out to a different tech with better press.
I understand your point, but I think the greater obstacle most people have to any device that is believed to put out more energy than it uses, is most of them are scams.
Us mere mortals here on earth will probably never be able to make a free energy machine. But no harm in trying. And while free energy violates the laws of thermodynamics, the universe is expanding faster and faster all the time which technically violates the 3rd law of thermodynamics. The driving force behind the expansion of the universe is vacuum energy which is the result of the uncertainty principle. Whether that vacuum energy could ever be harness is questionable. But it most likely would involve black holes (Look up Hawking radiation). In science friction, there was even a Star Gate episode where the ancients attempted to use vacuum energy but had given up on the idea.
He either forgot to carry a 1 or misplaced a decimal point 🤣🤣🤣. We don’t have the right type of metal on this planet to make perpetual motion a reality
Is there someone that can help me to fix this Newman motor with his original made commutator? ua-cam.com/video/OPKXCErZAMI/v-deo.html here is my version of the model. In some way the polarity don't change when the comm rotate. I try also with the shaft next to the coil.
Many years ago someone who worked with Joe told me they concluded the commutator with the short out segments was not necessary. It appears he didn't use that complex commutator on all of his motors. If you listen carefully to this part of his video I have linked to he says his motor is operating at Two pulses per revolution. I suspect the Two pulses are for the polarity reversal which occurs every 180 degrees of rotation. ua-cam.com/video/CrJIzrmX1mI/v-deo.html
You're having problems replicating his motor, because you are still bound by the laws of physics. Just read some Tesla, and find the line about taking 10W of energy stored in a capacitor, and turning into millions of HORSEPOWER.---ask yourself, why he didn't say millions of Watts. Then find the Tibor Kemeny patent. You might figure it out then. Before you ask, two answers. 1) Yes it's hidden in plain site. 2) No you can't get rich off of it.
I think the secret to the Neumann machine is that there was a secondary component where an electromagnet was made from the motion of permanent magnets, which acted like a lock of sorts extending the power generated. I'm not saying it right but a video from the Lasersaber youtube channel a few years ago made me think that had to of been the answer to the Neumann machine. Mind you, even Neumann said it wasn't perpetual motion because it would eventually run down. Anyways, keep up the videos. Jesus Christ Almighty God bless you and Jesus Christ Almighty God bless your family 😊
This video has a part 2 which demonstrates the effect of Counter Electromotive Force ua-cam.com/video/qmkzfZ8b4rs/v-deo.html
Back spick will charge an AC capacitor because the AC capacitor don't care which direction it's going
I helped Joseph Newman build a motor. A long one similar but different than yours. I couldn't turn the shift with my bare hands, when he applied the voltage to it, I couldn't slow it down with both hands. It had the current of one battery going through it.
Cd u recommend any channels which shows a better application or building of his motors
Trying to stop the shaft of a motor from turning by hand may seem impressive, but it can be very misleading.
After looking at Joseph Newman’s video, it does look like you are on the right track. I believe that Joseph Newman uses a flywheel to store mechanical energy (like a battery) on the rotor. Whether what Joseph Newman is producing is free energy or not, it’s at minimum a very high-efficiency motor. Check out his ‘Big Eureka’ concept for the heavy flywheel. Great video!
It's easy to see you're doing what you love, you look so happy and contented.
Stay safe.
For sure ;-) It would have been nice if I had created a new source of free energy, but I've found it can also be highly rewarding to find out what doesn't work as well.
Dave, I understand very little of what you demonstrated, but I enjoy watching a guy do experiments for the pure joy of discovery. Carry on!
Thanks Pat. I look forward to seeing your channel grow.
glad to see you inventing and having fun doing it. Liked,shared. All my best.
I am just amazed at the distance of the magnetic field you showed Grant. Maybe using more shielding would force more efficiency from this idea ?? What do you think fella ??
I'm not convinced more shielding would help, but it's an interesting idea. It seems that most every so called free energy idea I find turns out to be a scam. Here's free energy claim that sounds intriguing, but it sounds to good to be true. ua-cam.com/video/JU2JyE9h5o8/v-deo.html
@@GrantsPassTVRepair You are correct, every free energy idea I have seen so far is a SCAM. But there is something Dave that would work.
Here goes, when you take a magnet the shape of a doenut and put N fracking N they will never touch when placed on a dowel pole. Using this idea, you can take the same magnets and place them onto a fixture. The one is placed fixed, the other one you have attached to a connecting rod just like a gasoline engine. You will have to use Mumetal to short out the magnetic fields when the piston is going back up to have both magnets next to each other. The the mu metal shield has to instantly be removed. This will force the engine to cycle again and again. This has to work, as it does work when one uses his hand to move the metal in and out.
Does that make sense ??? Peace vf
Thanks!!! The secret to the Newman motor which everyone seems to leave out of their projects is heavy flywheel spinning which does the actual work , which equals horse power. And a capacitor bank parallel with batteries to absorb the backspike to feed actual amperage to the run batteries along with the voltage. Do not use a power supply, batteries only. The caps are storage also. Your speed will increase along with effencie. Please try this, I would like to see an update of this, by the way, I would love to have that machine!!!
You might enjoy my last video on Joe Newman ua-cam.com/video/DKxCPJKRM9Q/v-deo.html
I think that calling them free energy generators throws people off. It would be more accurate to call them converters. We are surrounded by energy all the time, these machines just convert it into a form we can use. It can be unlimited, however its not generating anything.
Keep up the good work!
Interesting project. 👍
It depends highly on the used commutator materials... If you use Graphite and copper you get these nice huge Backspikes Newman described in his book...if you are using other materials or just transistors the effect does not occur...it it some kind of battery effect you produce, when Dissimular Metals like copper and graphite touch and generate a voltage... The Spark is then just the "conductive electrolyte"... Regards Stefan.
Hi Stefan, I believe we spoke many years ago when I was part of the Newman news group. From what I recall you spent a lot of time experimenting with Joes ideas, and I remember someone saying the extra energy was related to the spark. If the extra power effect goe away using transistors that would seem to confirm what you are saying. As you can see my coil here is to small relative to what Joe taught, I tried a larger coil using a 12 gauge wire, but still far from anything Joe built. ua-cam.com/video/DKxCPJKRM9Q/v-deo.html
@@GrantsPassTVRepair yes, I even visited Newman in 1987 in Lucedale Mississippi... Have a look at my video about it on my channel.
No free energy, but all that looked like tons of fun!
You're probably right, but I don't think I've ever found anything so entertaining.
All energy is free
What a fun hobby!
some cool motor designs there. Love the videos. Take care.
You build lots but I'd love to see you tune some of your designs. You can easily make your latest Newman motor way more efficient buy using transitors or mosfet to eliminate the spark ont the commutator.That will make it much more efficient and reliable
May I ask if you have tried tipping the Newman motor on end? I have seen somewhere that the higher you get in elevation above the ground that the amperage will increase. I haven’t tried it myself.
I have not tried tipping the motor up on its end, but when you speak about the amperage increasing are you talking about the amperage the motor consumes as a motor, or the amperage it can produce as a generator? From a physics point of view I can't see why tipping the motor up would help, but I'd be curious as to who is making such a claim and why.
@@GrantsPassTVRepair I will keep you in mind if I come across that article again. Also I was wondering if you could utilize the following information for your experiments. The information came to me by way of my friend Pamela Aaralyn around 2016. She channeled Nikola Tesla and she asked me if I wanted to share it. I did but it but none in my circles at that time utilized it. This is only a small section of the four-page transcript: Does raising the frequency of a Tesla Coil increase its power?
"You would need to utilize a Class E RF amplifier. I prefer one made by Nathan and Alan Sokal in 1975. The Class E amplifier makes use of a resonant circuit to get around the usual problems of switching power semiconductors at high frequencies. This topology is now finding commercial success in high power radio transmitters and RF generators for plasma generation and induction heating. High voltage MOSFETs are the usual choice of switching device.
Advantages of the Class E power amplifier:
1. Simple design uses only one switching device.
2. Eliminates turn-on losses due to stored energy in the devices output capacitance.
3. Eliminates turn-on losses due to overlap of voltage and current when device turns on.
4. Zero-voltage at turn-on eliminates Miller effect due to drain-gate capacitance.
5. Minimizes turn-off losses by limiting rate of rise of voltage when device turns on.
6. Circuit makes use of stray capacitance and inductance that would normally be hindrance.
7. Very high efficiency (90 - 95%) so very little power to be dissipated as heat.
8. Low EMI and harmonic output because of the smooth drain voltage and soft switching.
Perhaps the main disadvantage of the Class E arrangement is that it is relatively intolerant of incorrect matching into its load. Whilst load matching is usually a good radio transmitter, this intolerance to mismatching may cause problems when put to service as a Tesla Coil driver."
What are we missing in terms of how to harness energy, today? "Copper, quartz and magnets, that simple. The pull of the magnet catalyzes the copper to affect the quartz. The energy within the quartz then is harnessed like a centrifuge - it disperses and then returns to its’ center. If my vision in my human time had prevailed, you would be now tapping into solar energy from space.”
Here is a power source that utilizes radio waves to produce power: Goodbye Global Warming - Maxwell Chikumbutso New Green Energy - Saith Power - Greener Power Machine: ua-cam.com/video/EZfPvjURcm8/v-deo.html
This should hold your interest for a while. Have a lovely weekend and enjoy your family.
@@donparkinson9561 At the very least this information is not complete, but to me this information sounds like someone is trying to sound intelligent about electronics without saying anything of value. It's as if they copied a few sentences from a book on class E power amplifiers, and added their own words to try and impress others. I'd be cautious with anyone who claims they can channel someone who has passed on..
I'll tell ya Dave, if you could get that huge magnet perfectly balanced it would be substantially more efficient.....
I still think there is a way of magnets opposing and being able to generate a small amount of current with just the opposing forces.....however, I digress because if it were entirely possible then it would be in patent...
Anyway, stay safe and how is the TV service end of the business going.
I still get calls for repairs but I just don't pursue them now that I'm working full time.
When I retire, I'm going start rebuilding/restoring old radios and possibly TVs from the 60s 70s 80's if possible.
Be well.😀
Hi Frank, Even though it violates the laws of physics, and most of the people who claim to have produced free energy are con men, I like to keep an open mind about this. On the business side of things it's been a little slower than usual, but I'm enjoying the slow down, and as you see my mind never stops dreaming about other possibilities.
@@GrantsPassTVRepair ..I agree, I've seen too many videos on UA-cam about free energy and yes, they are usually scams.
That's nothing but great, wow what a build. Please try the circuit "self Sustaining Pulse motor", a simple oscillator circuit. Work with almost any bipolar coil setup. I would like to see the results. Very good
I watched one video under this title, but I didn't see any proof it was self sustaining. Not to write the idea off, but I have a clock that can operate over a year on a single battery. To me this only proves it's energy efficient, but not self sustaining.
@@GrantsPassTVRepair It has run over a year and the battery voltage has stayed the same, time will tell, will make an update video in June. Look at the self sustaining pulse motor circuit using one Darlington array. I would want to see what your very long device would do as an oscillator and how much the cap charge. You have the expertise, I just try it and fry it and look for positive results. This one you built is stupindous, as for as I'm concerned, it's over the top. That's a bunch of big magnets and wire.
*I saw him when he was on the Jonny Carson show that they filmed in his garage with all the patent office people there. It was a 5000 lb magnet and after he got it spinning fast, he went inside and turned everything on and went back to the garage. The scientists said "your batteries are getting low'' to which he replied, ''I know'' and proceeded to unplug the motor from the batteries, plugged it into the wall and then plugged the battery charger in and went back inside, sat down and started watching tv with the AC on! He was selling electricity back to the electric co. Jonny stood on stage with him and they begged the people to write their ''representatives'' asking them to allow him to get a patent. He was never invited back...*
I've seen the video clip with Joseph Newman on the Johnny Carson show, but I've never heard anything about him selling electricity to the power company, and the magnet I remember was 650 pounds.
I think you may have missed part of the movie about Joe! the part where he says it converts "MASS" TO ENERGY ON A ONE TO ONE PROCESS! The mass of the coil and rotor are key to the operation of the machine.
No, I must have heard Joe talk about converting mass to energy dozens of times. I was a big fan of Joe at one time. I spoke with him on the phone, bought his books, and did dozens of experiments with his ideas. Here is my last one. ua-cam.com/video/DKxCPJKRM9Q/v-deo.html
like your work keep it up...
Although it is technically impossible to make free energy, there is no hope without trying, and nothing to be learned without doing some kind of experiment. :)
There's no substitute for hands on experiments.
Not accurate.
The laws of physics that no matter is created or destroyed, and that no energy is created, only transformed are flawed laws.
Their premise is correct but limited by “space”. In a ideal vacuum where all parameters could be controlled, they laws may be accurate but it’s ideal and not realistic.
The sun and globe spiral in a space that we cannot define. Centrifugal, gravitational, solar rays may all be finite sources of energy, but if their source energy source is greater than our life time they are sources worth harnessing.
Magnetism and electromagnetism are power sources that can be harnessed. They output forces greater than the ones introduced.
Perpetual motion is possible. Or a perpetual generator that feeds on energy sources that are not consumable in a lifetime are possible.
In my humble opinion. I know that is over simplified but... I don’t think we need to over complicate things either.
@@INSIDEHARDWARE acording to Wikipedia planetary orbit is Not Perpetual. Well it's Gonna last for billions of years.
Who cares if "Perpetual motion is impossible"? That phrase is More like an excuse to not research and experiment
@@DrWakeWalker the atmospheric clocks have been running for 100's of years, but are still called "experiments".
Newmand had two things for efficiency that were important, lots of copper and a flywheel for inertia ...... I'm still figuring out how to make the commutator fully elektronic ......
Self synchronized running generators it works ... You need two or three or four different motors in one unit ... It's been done long time a go ..🙄 👌🏼👌🏼👌🏼
It would be cool to check out your shop again. We do very similar things.
I don't think he got his York from the magnets and the coil, as much as he used the kinetic energy from the flywheel and use the back EMF to charge the AC capacitor that provided the kick every 180 degrees, I have a motor on my Channel that I built, it ran until the battery too good to run in the morning
What if the magnets were rotated, say 15 degrees clockwise one from another?
I don't believe you would gain anything if you did this.
Design is more important than powerful magnets also a cylindrical shape is more efficient the idea of Newman motor is to create torque with voltage so magnets has to create a cylindrical shape to create torque considering weight. To fix that issue u should separate your magnets suggest see Newman motor design because that's his secret. Building a big magnet with small one is the secret
Are they laws or suggestions? 🤔
The amount of wire in the coil is paramount to the success of Joe's motor , The principle behind the motor is the high resistance in the coil , It's very important . . The more the better . Joe Newman used 4000lbs of wire in his motor he named Big Eureka .. Fast and frequent switching is also paramount. . . The "ON" cycle of the coil is pulsed through the commutator . . It has serrated contacts. . The high resistance requires high voltage , which causes large sparks at the commutator . .
The way to calculate the power output requires measuring shaft Torq/power , not just electrical power , Total energy.. That's where most people make mistakes in power output calculations .
Yes I understand the importance of having a larger coil. Perhaps one day I'll try it again on a larger scale.
@@GrantsPassTVRepair , The underlying principle of Joe's Motor has to do with Electron motion spinning around an atom's nucleolus in the copper wire . It has gyroscopic forces . . Joe has written several books . Still available online .
Every atom we know of , has the same action .. All materials have different amounts of electrons than the others on the Periodic table of elements . . Conductive materials have "loose" electrons that move from atom to atom , that's what we call Electricity .
Perpetual motion :
It's been proven before , back in the 1930's
A " *PERPETUAL MOTION HOLDER* " can prove the endless motion of electrons .
ua-cam.com/video/Oa4oBUBSEzs/v-deo.html
Magnetism and Electricity are one and the same thing . .
Joe's motor can be built in many different styles , it's the Gyroscopic principle that makes it produce more than it uses .
I spent years trying to come to my own understand of how "Free Energy" is possible . . Joe's theory is one of the simplest to understand .
@@THOMASTHESAILOR I have Two of Joes books. One of them is the 7th edition of the energy machine of Joseph Newman, and the 2nd book I have is called "The Last Judgment" .The second book is has prophecies by Joe that never took place,
@@GrantsPassTVRepair , LOL, a lot prophecies never take place .
We all have our doomsday visions and hopes for a glorious miracle . . Ya gotta give the guy credit for being up front about his . . He's an open hearted Man of God. . Most people don't talk about their visions ..
Joe Newman was an inventor , A Thinker . . He invented the Plastic/concrete Barbell weights. . He started a successful company and sold them . . . Eventually he sold the business and created Big Eureka ..
@@THOMASTHESAILOR For sure. Joe inspired me to experiment and test ideas I would not have otherwise attempted,
I read the comments,man people can be Di%ks. Don't pay them any mind. Most of these people just look for a video to tear down,guess they are sharing their own misery. keep the videos coming and all my best.
Thanks Bobby, I've had some unusual feedback considering I never made any claims of producing free energy.
What keeps that long gadget going?
The term I'm more familiar with is reversed biased.
Judging by that compass, your wasting about 4 feet out of flipping magnetic field! Try replacing that much void with copper wire and see what kind of spike you get! And learn about the back spike! Its quite important.
Here is one with a little more wire. ua-cam.com/video/DKxCPJKRM9Q/v-deo.html
I liked your video, but a couple of points. First, you have a serious balance issue with your initially presented motor. Even if you discovered something from your configuration (like a gradual increase in acceleration) you may not notice. Second, you demonstrate the effect on your compass yet have all those magnetic motors sitting in close proximity to the experiment. Opposing fields will corrupt you data or outcome. Dont give up!
keep it coming, your very interesting,, I have a motor from a tredmill works good as a generator
Sounds like a project waiting to happen,
The best design too over come 100% efficiency is the DC pancakes motor with rotor coil between two stator magnets.
I'd like to see one in operation.
@@GrantsPassTVRepair You can find a vid in this youtube chann ,Electric Experiments Roobert 33. Name of video , Electric motor pancake high speed.
The iron core doesn't increase efficiency of DC permanent magnet motor. MAXIM. Efficiencies and the Power of electric motor are two different things. Minutes 2:57. I my self have tested coreless DC motor with 75% EFF and the motor that you show at 2:51 has no more then that.
Seems that you don't have enough windings on your stator... those magnets have weight to them, and if you used their mass for you instead of against you, you'd have a better outcome...
Here is an additional video on this experiment. ua-cam.com/video/DKxCPJKRM9Q/v-deo.html
Without the back emf there is no more energy, it is only transformed from one phase to another, look more into it and understand the concept, imagine that the current flowing is the river and capturing the back electromotive force is the waterwheel
Cut the Flux of a ring magnet and rotate it fast. Wow the pick up coil lot of electric energy.
Do you have an example?
It is an idea of a simple generator
@@dragon72tube If you have any pictures or video links it would help to understand this concept.
@@GrantsPassTVRepair Send me your email and I will send you the new idea
Didn't produce the device. Will work by cutting the Flux. Maybe good idea. It takes a 3d printer to make the Gen.
I know a guy that knew Joe Newman. This guy built a machine. I listened to the theory and thought it was crap. But something was happening. I call it a magnetic reactor and it really doesn't need any moving parts. They say there are 4 known forces in nature. Everyone knows the strong and weak forces. We have fusion and we're working on fusion. I call quasars gravitational reactors. They turn matter into energy through gravity. One left. Magnetism. And Newman stumbled upon a magnetic reactor.
to make free energy from magnets you have to have another force interven the north and south poles, this force is gravity force, otherwise will fail
If you can build a free energy device that actually works you can change the world for the better, and become wealthy in the process. I look forward to hearing of your success should you build such a device.
@@GrantsPassTVRepair oh yes I did built many and i used to cancel one pole to reach one pole greater than other by means of aluminium fins
please forgive the copy + paste Grant, and grants viewers :) , - but i gave a reply too my favorite famous hacker about 30 mins ago, and the answer is well suited too your work. - in terms of addressing the "more in than out" problem
@Gary McKinnon thanks for trying Gary. i have posted videos on my other channel of 3 working FE machines, and they are. my newman machine (20kgs),, my milkovitch two stage oscillator pendulm (100kgs) and my linear motor are my main 3 achievements. other than disproving countless other devices. but sadly my 3, despite being REAL OU, all have an ROI of around 10 - 20 years. based on current electricity prices.
if you are interested in the linear motor, i will paste you my videos too watch, in order too paint the operational picture and some development . the best COP of this machine is around 10. - but i believe 20 is easily achievable (at 1watt input). however by the time the input power reaches 30watts or so, the efficiency will drop following a curve, down too COP1
part 7 : ua-cam.com/video/uavoK5VQQNQ/v-deo.html
part 8 : ua-cam.com/video/eP1MM9hOvEc/v-deo.html
part 9 : ua-cam.com/video/7bhDG0YE6KA/v-deo.html
part 11 : ua-cam.com/video/vjxzKuikg5Y/v-deo.html
part 12 : ua-cam.com/video/rtE0NPCHwQQ/v-deo.html
basically. imagine you have 2 magnets placed 1 meter apart that are repelling eachother. and an 1watt electromagnet inbetween, - now you can increase the Gauss of the magnets too infinity, and the force of the electromagnet follows.
It's nice to see someone else experimenting, I find your videos difficult to follow due to back ground noise and an abundance of unrelated ideas, but I think I understand what your trying to do.
what if....you wrapped the copper wire around the wood in a spiral from one end to the other instead of wrapping it on the the side
just a thought
I'm not sure what might happen. Interesting idea though.
pancake on pancake layers connected in parallel and you will be surprised.
It is essentially what creative science and research sells in their SP500 plans
I have great respect for your work and time doing these experimets, yet I disagree with your conclusion regarding Newmans motor. Just because you failed to achieve his result, does not mean your conclusion is true. Newmans motor also work as flywheel that stores kinetic energy.
Yes perhaps Joe was on to something as all those engineers claimed, but his public demonstrations sure looked suspicious in the later part of his life. Did you happen to see this wonderful documentary about his life? ua-cam.com/video/CrJIzrmX1mI/v-deo.html
I always find it interesting that it is claimed to be impossible, but the theory of thermodynamics was 1850's -- before modern bearings, and concepts of electricity and magnetism. One thing people like to point to is the patent office refuses to patent any such device; however, that same group rejects patents for paragraph and line numbering mistakes, grammatical errors, and having too many words in the abstract... and let Marconi steal Tesla's work, Bell steal Gray's work, and many others. Engineering should be based on mathematical formulas, so where are the numbers for thermodynamics (bearing friction, atmospheric resistance, and other factors)? I have to think someone has done this work, and wish to see it. Thanks.
You might enjoy seeing this documentary about Mr Newman. ua-cam.com/video/CrJIzrmX1mI/v-deo.html
There is no breaking of the law of thermodynamics in a working Overunity concept. There are a lot of energy fields we do Not see with our eyes that such a generator Would tap into. Such as an antenna for atmospheric electricity. (wich is the closest concept of free energy that i can comfirms is real). (without the use of water or sun light)
Read a book called "shape power".
You May find some useful insight in the quest for free energy. It is all about the science of shapes and how they can be appllied to produce some satisfying results. The same author has also written a book on free energy.
The biggest problem with perpetual motion machines is the friction. It's the friction what eventually slow down the machine untill is stops.
Another fun projects are the socalled "Joule thief" circuits, where a single AA battery can power a LED for a week and pull the AA battery almost completely empty (till 0,3a0,4V). Those "Joule thiefs" can sometimes be found in LED torches, where they use the popular HH004F LED Driver. This LED driver looks like a transistor, and needs only a single inductor for powering multiple LED's with 1 AA battery.
With such a LED driver i have already powered 20 White power LED's with 1 AA battery.
The basic schematic of such a LED driver can be found here :
www.circuitsdiy.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/HH004F_LED_driver_Circuit.png
The maximum operating voltage of this LED driver is 6V , and it will produce a clean squarewave pattern of more then 200Khz (depending on the supplied voltage).
There is a reason for multiple windings
Yes. My coil should be much larger according to Newmans theories.
نعم
I'm not sure I understand the criticisms in some of the comments. Sure, there are no white lab coats and no clipboards with a slew of numbers and measurements. But this is still a bare-bones version of the scientific process at work here. Someone says: "I achieved X" (in this case free energy, but it doesn't really matter). And then you're supposed to say: "I don't believe you. Let me see if I can replicate your results." As long as you don't bend your experiment to fit your own preconceptions (which he didn't), I don't see anything wrong with it.
You could perhaps make the argument that even looking for free energy is a waste of resources. But they're his resources to waste, and he seems to be having fun.
So what exactly is the issue?
It is human curiosity.... so I develop a small one. What I found is that there is different movement when negative path go's through shaft and 🧲 and separate negative path.
I did numbers of experiments on it and got surprising effects.
When I thought again I realized that over unit effect is possible only when any system go into resonating mode 🤔😇🤩.
😠😡🤬 but what we, at list I had teach Resonance mens distraction and you should avoide it....
I can't folllow what you are saying.
@@GrantsPassTVRepair ok
You are wasting magnetic power.
Just try with 2 magnet and stuck on metal ( magnet should electrically connected ). Make two coils which will cover up the rotations.
The spicks should travels to shaft.
The moter you're showing at 6.00 minutes is the correct one
I still don't understand what you are saying.
If free energy existed I would buy a supersonic military jet airplane and I would fly all over the world at full speed, moving continuosly from one place to another, and I would come to the US to buy many things that are cheaper over there.
This isn’t a knock on you just the overall language used in alternative energy circles. But I believe that wide spread use of the term perpetual motion, in reference to any of a huge array of technologies, only serves to keep wider society from taking any of it seriously. When the average person hears perpetual motion, their brain automatically shuts down to anything you have to say. It completely poisons the well and serves to ensure lack of interest, and most importantly funding from the wider scientific community. Take any number of the most important tech innovations over the past 20 years and before showing them publicly, call it perpetual motion. Odds are it would still just be great idea that lost out to a different tech with better press.
I understand your point, but I think the greater obstacle most people have to any device that is believed to put out more energy than it uses, is most of them are scams.
Us mere mortals here on earth will probably never be able to make a free energy machine. But no harm in trying. And while free energy violates the laws of thermodynamics, the universe is expanding faster and faster all the time which technically violates the 3rd law of thermodynamics. The driving force behind the expansion of the universe is vacuum energy which is the result of the uncertainty principle. Whether that vacuum energy could ever be harness is questionable. But it most likely would involve black holes (Look up Hawking radiation). In science friction, there was even a Star Gate episode where the ancients attempted to use vacuum energy but had given up on the idea.
1 word ... leverage
He either forgot to carry a 1 or misplaced a decimal point 🤣🤣🤣. We don’t have the right type of metal on this planet to make perpetual motion a reality
Humans turning generator is free power, build gyms so they make power not consume it
Poor replication of the device. Also where is the computation? That is key.
Is there someone that can help me to fix this Newman motor with his original made commutator? ua-cam.com/video/OPKXCErZAMI/v-deo.html here is my version of the model. In some way the polarity don't change when the comm rotate. I try also with the shaft next to the coil.
Many years ago someone who worked with Joe told me they concluded the commutator with the short out segments was not necessary. It appears he didn't use that complex commutator on all of his motors. If you listen carefully to this part of his video I have linked to he says his motor is operating at Two pulses per revolution. I suspect the Two pulses are for the polarity reversal which occurs every 180 degrees of rotation. ua-cam.com/video/CrJIzrmX1mI/v-deo.html
@@GrantsPassTVRepair I will try, thanks
Find a channel called inventor 3.
If you can replicate what he is doing then you probably gonna get some good results
Thanks. Solar panels are the closest thing to free energy I've found so far, and they don't cost much.
You're having problems replicating his motor, because you are still bound by the laws of physics. Just read some Tesla, and find the line about taking 10W of energy stored in a capacitor, and turning into millions of HORSEPOWER.---ask yourself, why he didn't say millions of Watts. Then find the Tibor Kemeny patent. You might figure it out then. Before you ask, two answers. 1) Yes it's hidden in plain site. 2) No you can't get rich off of it.
Interesting video, but the seek for free energy is a waste of time, if it existed the universe would not be the same.
FulvioGa I think the video very well demonstrates that it’s not a waste of time. Your not likely to succeed but you will learn a ton on the way.
I suspect your right, but it's so fun to try.
Unsubbed.
I'll try not to shed a tear.
I think the secret to the Neumann machine is that there was a secondary component where an electromagnet was made from the motion of permanent magnets, which acted like a lock of sorts extending the power generated.
I'm not saying it right but a video from the Lasersaber youtube channel a few years ago made me think that had to of been the answer to the Neumann machine.
Mind you, even Neumann said it wasn't perpetual motion because it would eventually run down. Anyways, keep up the videos.
Jesus Christ Almighty God bless you and Jesus Christ Almighty God bless your family 😊